This article explains why, as the Labor Commissioner is impinging on the contractual rights of personal managers for being unlicensed talent agents, without the legislative authority to do so, the TAA is being enforced in a draconian, unfair, unconstitutional manner. The question is: will the Labor Commissioner do anything about it, or will a judge in a current case make the difference?
This article explains why, as the Labor Commissioner is impinging on the contractual rights of personal managers for being unlicensed talent agents, without the legislative authority to do so, the TAA is being enforced in a draconian, unfair, unconstitutional manner. The question is: will the Labor Commissioner do anything about it, or will a judge in a current case make the difference?
Original Title
Ladj 2022: The Year CA's TAA will be enforced as written?
This article explains why, as the Labor Commissioner is impinging on the contractual rights of personal managers for being unlicensed talent agents, without the legislative authority to do so, the TAA is being enforced in a draconian, unfair, unconstitutional manner. The question is: will the Labor Commissioner do anything about it, or will a judge in a current case make the difference?
This article explains why, as the Labor Commissioner is impinging on the contractual rights of personal managers for being unlicensed talent agents, without the legislative authority to do so, the TAA is being enforced in a draconian, unfair, unconstitutional manner. The question is: will the Labor Commissioner do anything about it, or will a judge in a current case make the difference?
will be enforced as written? At any time, empowered by the Legislature’s giving the administrative agency the power to “adopt, amend, and repeal such rules and regulations as are reasonably necessary for the purpose of enforcing and administering” the Talent Agencies Act to remain consistent with how the act has been codified, the enforcement can be corrected.
In 1967, the California Court of Appeal controversies. Last year, California-
found that Jefferson Airplane's personal licensed sports agency Independent manager had worked to get the band gigs Sports & Entertainment simply walked without first applying for and receiving a away from a seven-figure breach-of- talent agency license, as required by the contract suit after NBA star Jimmy state's Talent Agencies Act (Labor Code Butler made a claim that that the Section 1700 et seq.). As a penalty for agency's procuring of an endorsement the unlicensed procurement, the court deal without also having a talent agency voided the manager's contractual license was a TAA violation. rights. See Buchwald v. Superior Court, 254 Cal. App. 2d 347. These losses have compromised businesses, caused personal Ever since, with courts relying bankruptcies, broken marriages, and in a on Buchwald to void all or some of an few cases, shortened lives. They have unlicensed procurer's contractual rights - also been the continuation of a judicial - along with some abandoning owed error of immeasurable proportion. commissions versus filing suit, and others settling for cents on the dollar In her 2008 opinion in Marathon instead of going through the full judicial Entertainment v. Rosa Blasi, 42 Cal. 4th process -- personal managers have 974, California Supreme Court Justice forfeited an estimated half-billion dollars Kathryn Werdegar twice noted how the of otherwise-owed compensation. TAA, "provides no remedy for its violation." "The Act is silent -- Professionals in related fields have been completely silent -- on the subject of the similarly entwined in TAA proper remedy for illegal procurement." When the California Legislature does not The California Supreme Court has made codify a remedy, neither an clear that while the Legislature has the administrative agency (the labor power to delegate the administration, commissioner in TAA cases) nor a judge interpretation and be the original has the right to mete an uncodified one. adjudicator of relevant controversies, it does not delegate the duty of creating a Violations of law are "made up of two remedy: "An administrative agency parts, forbidden conduct and a prescribed cannot by its own regulations create a penalty. The former without the latter is remedy which the Legislature has no [violation]." U.S. v. Evans, 333 U.S. withheld. 'Administrative regulations 483, 486 (1948). Assigning a penalty that alter or amend the statute or enlarge without statutory guideposts "is a task or impair its scope are void and courts outside the bounds of judicial not only may, but it is their obligation to interpretation," reserved only for and by strike down such regulations.'" Dyna- legislative action. Id. at 495. Med Inc. v. Fair Empl. & Housing Comm., 43 Cal. 3d 1385 (1987). "It is "Engrained in our concept of due process fundamental an administrative agency is the requirement of notice. Notice is may not usurp the legislative sometimes essential so that the citizen function." Id. quoting Agricultural Lab. has the chance to defend charges. Notice Relations Bd. v. Sup. Court, 16 Cal. 3d is required before property interests are 392, 419 (1976). disturbed, before assessments are made, before penalties are assessed." Lambert The Dyna-Med court limited its review v. California, 355 U.S. 225, 228 (1957). and thus prohibition to creating a remedy for punitive damages. In Peralta v. Fair "Where a statute fails to provide a Empl. & Housing Comm., 52 Cal. 3d 40, penalty it has been uniformly held that it 60 (1990), the Supreme Court similarly is beyond the power of the court to held that without statutory authority, prescribe a penalty." New Jersey v. Fair administrative agencies are barred from Lawn Service Center, Inc., 120 A.2d creating compensatory remedies. 233, 236 (N.J. 1956). In 2013, the Daily Journal published my "[I]n order for a consequence to be column, "A generation of incorrect implied from a statute there must be Talent Agencies Act rulings," explaining greater justification for its inclusion than how Buchwald got it wrong -- by consistency or compatibility with the act misinterpreting all four of the California from which it is implied. A necessary Supreme Court holdings it cited for its implication within the meaning of the authority to void a found violator's law is one that is so strong in its contractual rights: Wood v. Krepps, 168 probability that the contrary thereof Cal. 382, 386 (1914); Smith v. Bach, 183 cannot reasonably be supposed." Grubb Cal. 259, 262 (1920); Loving & Evans v. & Ellis Co. v. Bello, 19 Cal. App. 4th Blick, 33 Cal. 2d 603, 608-09 (1945); 231 (1993). and Severance v. Knight- Counihan Co., 29 Cal. 2d 561, 568 (1947). Yet nine 21VECP00262, where the lack of a years later, personal managers and now penalty provision and the related producers, licensed attorneys and sports consequences has been raised and agents are still being compromised by assumptively will be ruled upon. The end the findings in Buchwald. of this draconian, unfair, unconstitutional enforcement cannot come soon enough. This may change soon. At any time, empowered by the Legislature's giving For those wanting more detail about the administrative agency the power to these issues, on February 25 Professor "adopt, amend, and repeal such rules and Kevin J. Greene, the John Schumacher regulations as are reasonably necessary chair of Southwestern Law School, is for the purpose of enforcing and producing, and the Biederman Institute administering" the TAA to remain of Southwestern Law School is consistent with how the act has been presenting, a forum on the implications codified, the enforcement can be of the most recent TAA decisions and corrected. the potential of changes because of litigation using the above-mentioned There is also a case in Los Angeles arguments. Information is available on County Superior Court, Echo Lake the Biederman Institute website. Management LLC v. Meg Deloach,