Key Application Utility Poles/Telecommunication Masts/Airport Fences

Introduction
This key application provides a comprehensive overview of a group of
products, centred on utility poles, where composites have in many cases
proved to be the ideal material to fulfil the technical, environmental and
economic requirements of the application. Along with utility poles, other
structural components are considered such as telecommunication masts and
airport fencing structures, applications where the exclusive benefits of
composites have been exploited. By far the largest market for utility structures
is in the US and Canada, and therefore much of the information in this
summary stems from products and research from these countries. Smaller
markets exist in Scandinavian Countries and other parts of Europe.
Background
Telecommunication or Utility poles are responsible for
supporting thousands of miles of electricity and
communication cables above ground. Under this general
description come products such as electricity line
carriers, telecommunication masts, radar masts and
antenna. Airport fencing marks the perimeter of
controlled airport authority land and has specific security
and safety requirements.
Although all of these products perform different functions,
they exploit many of the same inherent benefits of
polymer composite materials and are frequently
discussed in general throughout this report.
Development History/Why Composites?
Technology to produce composite poles and mast sections has been
available for probably forty years. Until recently however, there have been two
major factors prohibiting the uptake of composites in these application areas.
These were susceptibility to the ultraviolet radiation (present in sunlight) and
cost of production.
Advances in polymer chemistry have seen the advent of specific UV stabilised
resins. Cost issues have been alleviated with the development of high-speed
manufacturing processes and the stabilisation of raw material prices. These
developments have addressed initial reservations and paved a route to
market for these products.
Utility pole supporting
electricity cables
(Shakespeare)
The major factors now encouraging the uptake of polymer composites are
their inherent corrosion resistance, environmental safety and low installation
costs.
Concerns over current materials are also causing authorities to investigate
alternatives. In the US and Canada, who account for the majority of the
worldwide utility pole market, many existing poles are constructed from wood.
The decay of wood over time is an inevitable problem that minimises the
service life to an average 30 years. Wood pole re-treatment programmes can
cost utility companies $35 a pole on a five year rotational cycle. Furthermore,
once decay begins, it is likely to continue until the pole strength is insufficient
and the structure has to be condemned. When this is the case, the end
disposal of wood poles is now also causing major environmental concern.
Nearly all wood poles are treated with preservatives, such as creosote, which
is now deeming the material hazardous waste, making disposal difficult and
expensive. Depending on the complexity of the system, the replacement cost
for just one pole has been stated as being as much as US $10,000. Steel
products also suffer from similar corrosion problems, again reducing effective
service life and increasing life cycle costs with required maintenance.
Increasing installation costs of wood and steel poles
are also promoting the uptake of composite poles.
Access to remote areas is usually limited and does
not have the capacity for large vehicles carrying
heavy steel or timber poles. It is usually the case
that specialist access roads need to be constructed
solely to transport the poles to their installation site,
incurring massive costs. Their low weight implies
composite poles can be transported by helicopter to
remote locations, therefore relieving road
construction costs. The lightweight also means
installation is faster and achievable with less
manpower.
Passive safety and radar transparency have
influenced uptake in the case of airport fences and
radar masts. The additional benefits of composites
are also advantageous in these applications.
Initial uptake has been across Europe
where passive safety is being recognised
and addressed. New standards state that
perimeter structures must be fangible, i.e
stiff and strong during operation, but fragile
when hit by an aircraft in the case of an
emergency. These features significantly
improve passenger safety and protection
of the surrounding area. Frangibility is
also therefore a major advantage for utility
poles situated on the roadside, although
this benefit is not yet widely recognised.
Composite Airport Fencing
(Bekeart)
Remote installation of a
composite pole
(Powertrusion)
Engineering and Design Principles
Structural design with composite materials is more complex than with
conventional materials such as steel and timber. This is mainly due to the fact
that composites are neither homogenous nor isotropic. That is, they do not
exhibit the same material structure throughout the bulk of the material and
they do not have the same properties in different axes. This implies that in-
depth design calculations and analysis is required to account for the varying
material properties and direction of loading.
In summary, there are four main properties that must be considered when
designing a composite structural member such as a utility pole:
Deflection
Strength
Shear
Fatigue
Deflection is controlled with preferential
orientation and volume of fibre reinforcement.
The strength must be sufficient to resist loading
and compressive buckling, and is benefited by
off-angle reinforcement, as is shear.
Resistance to fatigue is increased by balancing
the laminate structure to minimise internal
stresses and fibre interactions.
In general, the selection of a compatible resin
and reinforcement system, with the service
conditions in mind, is essential to obtain a
quality product.
From a structural viewpoint, it is not the
material strength that determines the load
carrying capacity of a utility pole or mast, but
its structural stiffness. The reinforcement angle
also affects the stiffness and flexibility of a
pole. When considering a column structure, it
is beneficial to have a highly uni-directional
(UD) fibre reinforcement arrangement. In many
cases, up to 80% of the reinforcement is
aligned along the main axis to provide
maximum stiffness.
Moreover, structural attachments such as
crossarms, transformers and support guys
increase loading and exert compressive forces
on the pole. Therefore a certain proportion of
the fibre must be wound at an angle off the
Main U.D.
Reinforcement
Off-axis
Reinforcement
Typical arrangement of fibre
Reinforcement in a utility pole
main axis (commonly 15
o
or 45
o
) to provide
resistance to compressive buckling.
Other scenarios, such as the build up of snow
on electricity lines, can also significantly amplify
forces acting on the structure and must be
accounted for at the design stage, irrespective
of the likelihood of occurrence. For a product to
be cost competitive, the design needs to
accurate so dimensions are sufficient enough
to meet structural requirements, but not
excessive in order to maximise the efficiency of
material usage.
It is also common practice to apply a suitable
safety factor (overload design factor) during the
design stage. At present, the (or safety factor)
is 2.5 for steel and pre-stressed concrete,
whereas it is 4 for composites and wood. However, it is believed that the
numerous successful examples of FRP poles now in the field will lead to the
reduction of this factor to 2.5, in line with steel. This safety factor reduction
would have large implications on the cost effectiveness of composite
structures. Designers could specify thinner wall sections and pole diameters,
meaning less material is used in the structure and it becomes less expensive
to manufacture.
An additional design consideration is Fatigue. Wind poses a significant fatigue
load of varying frequency to poles and masts, which must be accounted for.
Fortunately, fatigue performance is an area where composites have been
shown to far outperform steel components. Manufactures Shakespeare claim
they have not been able to induce any type of fatigue failure in a fibreglass
laminate.
UV damage, whereby the structure surface is eroded, exposing the
reinforcement fibres, is a common concern, or now misconception, over new
FRP products. This phenomenon is dependent on the ultraviolet energy levels
in the atmosphere and can be apparent after as little as three years service in
the field.
Certain measures are now taken to ensure UV damage is avoided. Ensuring a
resin rich surface with UV inhibitors in the resin system before coating, use of
UV inhibited resin throughout the whole part thickness or application of a resin
rich surface veil are all suitable methods of preventing UV damage.
Combined, these can give the structure an 80 year service life before any kind
of degradation is observed.
Pole deflections at various
wind angles
(Shakespeare)
Filament Winding
(Scott Bader)
Manufacturing Processes
The filament winding process is the most common for the manufacture of
utility poles and masts. Other processes are applicable, such as Vacuum
Infusion (VI) and resin Transfer Moulding (RTM), but these are far less
commonplace due to economic factors.
The filament winding process involves
impregnating reinforcing fibres with catalysed
resin, then winding them onto a solid, rotating
mandrel. Successive layers of reinforcement are
built up on the mandrel until the required
thickness is achieved.
Winding of the reinforcement can be adjusted to
vary the strength of the tube between the axial
and circumferential directions according to the
loading requirements and other specifications of
the application. Void free winding is possible to
maximise the electrical properties i.e eliminate
the air content, of the component for high
voltage or radar sensitive applications.
Airport fences and similar structures are
usual l y assembl ed from pul truded
composite profiles. Uniform cross-sections
with exceptional longitudinal strength and
rigidity can be manufactured by the
pultrusion technique. Continuous length
fibre reinforcements, impregnated with an
activated resin, are pulled through a heated
forming die which shapes the material. The
catalyst is activated by the heat and the
resin then cures. The solid cured profile is
then automatically cut to length in-line, as
part of a continuous process.
Status of Research in the Field
When composites initially entered the construction industry, research was
focused on structural design for this type of application as the materials
required a new design philosophy and the performance of the material
needed to be understood. Research on composites within the construction
industry has been slower than in the aerospace industry for example, where
higher performance applications justify larger research budgets.
Pultrusion
(Liberty Pultrusions)
At present, research is still lagging behind that of other industries as the
construction industry has shown a reluctance to accept new materials. It is
anticipated that exceptional performance of composite materials will help
promote research into them. Now that the materials are better understood,
current research now encapsulates the through life performance of composite
structures and comparative studies with conventional materials, both from a
performance and economic viewpoint.
Research into the environmental impact of the use of composites is an area of
increasing industrial and academic interest. Environmental issues have
become an important topic due to the heightened public awareness, and
many companies are willing to fund research to show they are active in this
area. Increasingly the full life cycle environmental effects are now considered,
right through from energy usage and pollution during production to the
consequences of end disposal. The recycling of composites is also a subject
on the agenda. As many structures are far from the end of their useful life, this
research remains in its infancy.
Standards
Applicable standards depend very much on the country, and to some extents
the area, in which the end products are to be situated and operated.
Composite utility poles are far more prominent in countries such as the USA
and Canada. However, these areas of the world can experience very different
climates to that of say the UK, and therefore it follows that different standards
will be applicable.
Design standards are usually complex, the main criteria being a limit placed
on the allowable horizontal deflection under the worst case loading conditions.
Prototype structures are normally tested for static deflection, a test in which
the pole is supported as a cantilever and weights hung from it at various
points along the length. The deflection at the top end is measured to verify or
correct the design methodology. Test methods are also defined in the
appropriate standards.
Poles are designed according to their loading classification. In the US and
Canada, wood pole classes range from class 1 to class 5. Class 1 poles must
be designed to resist the highest loading factors and would be situated in the
worst of environmental conditions (eg high winds and snow). Class 5 is the
least onerous and is assigned to poles being situated in the mildest of
locations. Links to Standards Agencies are provided in the Further
Information section at the end of this report.
Market Status
The largest markets for utility poles in general are in Canada and the US,
where there are millions of poles of differing materials currently in service. The
market in Canada has been estimated to be worth $ 9 billion per year, closely
followed by the US at $ 8 billion. The composite utility pole market therefore
has the potential for large-scale development.
The vast share of these markets presently belong to timber and steel
products. However, the growing number of successful installations and
heightening awareness of the performance and financial benefits of composite
products is helping them to penetrate this market. If composites managed to
claim just 10% of the present market then this in itself represents a huge
market for composite materials in the construction industry and would be
instrumental in raising their status as construction materials.
The market in Europe is smaller, but still estimated to be worth $2 billion
annually. Many services in the UK are now being placed underground as
traditional steel structures begin to fail due to corrosion and the market
potential is therefore smaller.
Composite airport fences are relatively new but have already been installed at
European airports such as Brussels and Barcelona. Unfortunately, at present
there remain a limited number of companies offering these products, thus
limiting exposure of the product. However, as fence schemes become due for
renewal and passive safety standards are enforced, it is envisaged that more
companies will introduce these products to their standard range.
Specific Issues Preventing Market Development
Early high cost and susceptibility to UV degradation have inhibited uptake in
the past. This is now not the case due to advances in manufacturing and
materials technology. However, misconceptions over these issues remain
commonplace, inhibiting their widespread uptake until they are addressed and
construction industries view in general is changed. The uptake of steel utility
poles, because of their low initial cost and consumer confidence in the
material, is also preventing market penetration for composites.
Many authorities are still neglecting a full life cycle viewpoint when making
purchasing decisions. Although the initial cost of composite structures is
higher than conventional materials, their longer, low maintenance, service
lives and lower installation costs significantly reduce the total cost of
composite alternatives. It is often the case that authorities are perturbed by
high costs when specifying for large installations.
The table below provides a comparison of costs between common and
alternative utility pole materials. As can be seen, polymer composites are by
far the most expensive initial cost options. However, when the annual cost is
considered, calculated from and average expected life and incorporating
probable maintenance costs, it becomes clear that composites are patently
more cost effective.
Information:
- Costs are based on a 40ft, Class 4 pole.
- Maintenance costs apportioned at US $35 per pole per 5 year maintenance cycle.
- These calculations do not include transportation, installation or disposal costs (which can be
up to $10,000 for one wood pole), which would further amplify the life cycle costs of all
competitors to composites.
Competing/Alternative Solutions
The vast majority of existing utility structures, situated in the US, are made
from wood. Growing environmental concerns over the use and disposal of
wood is leading to the uptake of several alternative materials.
Steel is a popular alternative to timber and is the material that is experiencing
the largest uptake for new structures. It offers large initial cost advantages
over other alternatives and is readily available with established manufacturing
routes. Other, less common forms of steel are now also considered for this
type of application:
Uncoated weathering steel is now being used as a lower life cycle cost
alternative to steel and timber. It claims the same benefits as steel, but
negates the need for application of protective coating to prevent corrosion.
Authorities may see this as a viable alternative as the same design systems,
already in operation, with skilled staff, can be utilised an the need for re-
training and the adoption of new design systems are avoided.
Recycled Steel for utility poles is made with electric arc
furnace. According to the steel industry, when one tonne of
steel is recycled, the following is conserved: 2,500 pounds
of iron ore, 1,400 pounds of coal and 120 pounds of
limestone. Some of the initial cost can also be recouped
through salvage at the end of the poles useful life.
However, with the selection of steel, authorities are still
neglecting a full life cycle view. The material remains prone
to corrosion and is extremely expensive to transport,
especially to remote locations. Steel utility poles are either
galvanised or coated with a sealant, increasing initial and
through life maintenance costs. While steel production has
MATERIAL INITIAL COST AVERAGE LIFE MAINTENACE COSTS COST/YEAR
($) (Years) (Total $) ($)
Wood 250 30 210 15
Steel 260 35 245 14
Concrete 350 35 245 17
COMPOSITE 900 80 0 11
Cost comparison of alternative utility pole materials
Corrosion of
Steel Pole
(A & M)
been cleaned up over recent years, air and water pollution associated with the
processing phase remains the focus of environmental concern. Studies have
also found that airborne dioxin emissions are associated with steel production
in iron sintering plants.
Reinforced Concrete (RC) is also an alternative material to treated wood.
Concrete poles are preferential to wood from the viewpoint that they do not
require treatment with hazardous preservatives. However, current practice in
the US of producing cement through the burning of hazardous waste raises
other environmental pollution problems. Furthermore, concrete construction
material is normally not recycled, although techniques for reuse exist. The
excessive weight of concrete poles implies that transportation and installation
costs are higher than for other alternatives.
Glass reinforced concrete (GFRC) poles possess the same non-conductive
and non-corrosive benefits as composite poles. An advantage of this
alternative is that it can be produced more economically with the filament
winding process used to make composite poles. However, current structural
applications of this material are limited and its performance in the field is
unknown, leading to caution.
Future Developments Pending
It is anticipated that the market for composite structures of this type will
develop significantly in the coming years. As the market grows, continual
materials and process development will help reduce the weight and cost of
composite products. Fewer raw materials will be utilised, whilst maintaining
performance characteristics, thus minimising raw material usage and
associated environmental effects.
The performance monitoring of composite structures is a subject of ongoing
research. Otherwise known as smart monitoring, it involves the incorporation
of fibre optic transducers within the normal material to monitor the structural
integrity or health of the component. The structure can thus be analysed for
operating data such as stress, strain or undetected voids and provide an early
warning to the owner.
In recent years carbon fibre (CF) composites have been employed extensively
in post-strengthening applications. Their potential for new structures is still not
widely recognised, but CF is a material that could be exploited in these
products. Their massive strength to weight advantage (1kg of carbon
compares to 30kg of steel in strength) could override the additional cost with
lower material requirements and reduced handling costs.
Research into the use of thermoplastic composites has also commenced.
Although relatively unknown in the construction industry, if proved viable,
these materials could enhance environmental benefits from their recyclability.
Overview of Impact and Significance of the Technology
A summary of the major significance of this technology is provided below.
Specific Engineering, Financial, Environmental and Social impacts on the
construction industry are subsequently outlined.
Significance of the Technology
Massive through life financial savings potential.
These products are less damaging to the environment than current
products.
Airport fencing and radar masts are inherently translucent to
electromagnetic radiation they do not interfere with Instrument Landing
Systems (ILS)
These materials involve more complex design than conventional materials.
Impact of the Technology
Engineering:
Design flexibility allows selection of strength, stiffness and fatigue
characteristics
Electricity lines can be placed in a closer proximity without the risk of
electrical arcing.
Advanced manufacturing processes allow economic material placement to
maximise the strength to weight ratio.
Composites exhibit good fatigue resistance, which includes thermal cycling,
meaning they can be installed in environments which experience large
fluctuations in temperature, such as Canada.
Composite poles can be drilled and machined as conventional materials.
Financial:
Transportation costs to remote sites are dramatically reduced. General
transportation is more cost effective.
Lower maintenance and ownership costs. Longer service lives increase
replacement intervals and associated costs.
Higher density of corridor population brings savings to distribution
companies.
Environmental:
Reduction in the use of toxic pesticides and wood preservatives necessary
with timber products.
No leaching of chemicals into the surrounding earth where they are
installed.
Reduced impact on the environment arising from the construction of
specialist access roads.
Some forms of composite pole are now recyclable.
Social:
The poles are safer and easier to install on site.
Less disruption to local communities during large-scale installations.
The 'passive safe' nature of composite poles improves vehicle passenger
safety where utility poles are installed at the roadside.
Further Information and References
Key Players in the Industry
Shakespeare www.shakespeare-ce.com
Kazak Composites www.kazakcompsites.com
Topglass Composites www.topglass.it
Powertrusion International Inc. www.powertrusion.com
North Pacific Inc. www.north-pacific.com
Bekeart Composites www.bekeart.com
Exel Compsites www.exel.net/industry
IsoTruss Structures Inc. www.isotruss.com
References
Analysis of the North American Wood Pole Coalition Technical Bulletin
http://www.steel.org/infrastructure/pdfs/UP-030210.pdf
(Environmental hazards of wood poles)
University of Manitoba Utility Pole research
http://www.ce.umanitoba.ca/~polyzoi/Research/Utility%20Poles/utility_poles.html
Alternatives to Wood Poles
http://www.ncamp.org/poisonpoles/alt.html
"Structural Alternatives for Utilities"
A report by the MDA Market development Alliance of the Composites Industry
www.mdacomposites.org
"Lightweight Composites Hold Energy Lines"
A report by the MDA
Experimental Results on Centrifugated GFRP Poles for Electric Lifelines
Carlo Castiglioni and Maura Imbimbo
Journal of Composites for Construction -- August 1999 -- Volume 3, Issue 3 pp. 125-133
Composite Utility Poles may eliminate toxic waste"
In: Reinforced Plastics, Vol 42, No.6. June 1998. PP 6
Low Cost, High Speed Fiber Optic Grating Demodulation System for Monitoring Composite
Structures
Seim, J. et al, Blue Road Research
www.bluerr.com
Civil Engineers Can Make Better Use of the Strength of Advanced Fibrous Materials
U. Meier & I. Stcklin, EMPA, Dbendorf, Switzerland
G. P. Terrasi, SACAC Schleuderbetonwerk AG, Lenzburg, Switzerland
Inorganic Composites: A Brief History and Applications
Yeagley, H. 2002, Composites Fabricators Association
Uncoated Weathering Steel in Structures
FWHA Technical Advisory,
www.safety.fwha.dot.gov/fourthlevel/hardware/breakaway/pdf/ls30.pdf
KCIs Patented, Composite Pole Saves Lives in Accidents by Energy-Absorbing Collapse
www.kazakcomposites.com/util_pole.pdf
Pole Position
Ashbury, D., Northern News Services, 24
th
Nov 1999.
www.nnsl.com/frames/newspapers/1999-11/nov24_99pole2.html
Poisoned Utility Poles
Californians for Alternatives to Toxics (CATs)
www.alternatives2toxics.com
Utility Poles Cited as a Chemical Danger
February 5, 1997: New York Times national edition
Local fiberglass utility poles replace heavier wood ones
December 10, 1996: The State newspaper, Columbia, SC
Organisations
American Iron and Steel Institute www.steel.org
(Information on steel utility poles and wood pole toxicity)
FHWA - US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration
www.fwha.dot.gov
MDA The Market Development Alliance of the FRP Composites Industry
www.mdacomposites.org
Standards Agencies
British Standards Institute www.bsi-global.com
BS 16: 1974 Specification for telegraph pole materials
BS 607 Part 2 Specification for concrete poles for electrical transmission
ANSI American National Standards Institute www.ansi.org
AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
www.aashto.org
References to Figures
Shakespeare www.shakespeare-ce.com
Powertrusion International Inc. www.powertrusion.com
Bekeart Composites www.bekeart.com
Liberty Pultusions Inc. www.libertypultrusions.com
A&M Protective Coatings Ltd. www.amprotective.co.uk