Jump to content

Wikifunctions:Requests for deletions

From Wikifunctions
Latest comment: 1 hour ago by Feeglgeef in topic First true (Z19602)

Functions or implementations or tests which do not work properly, do not meet notability criteria or are duplicates of another object can be deleted. Please nominate items for deletions under the "Requests for deletion" section below.

If it is obvious vandalism, just report it in Wikifunctions:Report vandalism, or ping an administrator. Contact can also be made with an administrator on Telegram or IRC #wikipedia-abstract.

If it is a predefined object (it's ZID is less than 10000), please see Wikifunctions:Report a technical problem.

SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 1 day.
Archive
Archives

English -ed form (Z13284)

Duplicate of English -ed form (regular) (Z13177) --Ameisenigel (talk) 15:47, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@JosefAnthony and GrounderUK: FYI --Ameisenigel (talk) 16:53, 27 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yes, it looks like that never progressed. It would be a shame to lose its Hausa label, assuming that’s valid for Z13177. I wouldn’t ordinarily enter a label in an unfamiliar language but this might be a justifiable exception (if @JosefAnthony doesn’t respond). GrounderUK (talk) 12:33, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Z18905

Duplicate of regular expression match (Z10196), it being older. Jummit (talk) 16:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@99of9: FYI --Ameisenigel (talk) 08:15, 20 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
My bad. Thanks for the proposal. It might help to migrate bits of the new one, or links to it. Feel free to start doing this. I support eventual deletion. 99of9 (talk) 11:29, 20 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
I think everything has been migrated now. --Ameisenigel (talk) 16:52, 27 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Done 99of9 (talk) 01:30, 7 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Ameisenigel (talk) 16:20, 9 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

(!) ones' complement (Z12012)

Does not work, its sole implementation cannot work (~"1001" results in an error, not "0110"). If this took an integer, it would be a duplicate of signed bitwise not (Z17794). —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:27, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Lectrician1: FYI --Ameisenigel (talk) 16:24, 9 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
you're ok to delete Lectrician1 (talk) 00:09, 10 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Z19450 and Z19452

Per Wikifunctions:Determinism.

Pinging @Feeglgeef and @Oqwd3892 (they said on my talk page that they use two accounts). Jdforrester (WMF) (talk) 20:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

First one is not deterministic, second one is determinisic. Not sure what made you think the second one isn't, but it is. Oqwd3892 (talk) 20:24, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
The intent for the second one was for input of the current time, which is what Wikifunctions:Determinism recommends. I'm in support of the first one being deleted. Also, if Wikifunctions:Determinism is a policy, please remove the Essays category from it. Oqwd3892 (talk) 20:27, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Done --Ameisenigel (talk) 16:31, 9 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Z19452 was deterministic and worked exactly as intended, see my comments above. I will recreate my function. Feeglgeef (talk) 20:14, 9 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Ameisenigel: @Jdforrester (WMF): I've recreated both functions. Please read the policy you are using before deleting functions :-). Thanks! Feeglgeef (talk) 03:47, 10 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Z19551

Either a bug or my wifi caused Interlace typed lists (Z19550) to be created twice at the exact same time. Feeglgeef (talk) 17:14, 5 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

We might want to keep both of them for the bug report I made. Feeglgeef (talk) 17:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Done 99of9 (talk) 01:30, 7 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Ameisenigel (talk) 16:21, 9 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

First true (Z19602)

Effective duplicate of index of first listing (1...N) (Z13708) Feeglgeef (talk) 06:20, 8 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Additionally Triple if (Z19565), given existence of N-ifs (Z19601). Feeglgeef (talk) 06:22, 8 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
No, I support these functions. In particular Triple if (Z19565) will be used a lot, and the format is easier and better Type-controlled than making lists. I'll edit First true (Z19602) to match our usual indexing pattern. 99of9 (talk) 06:25, 8 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Alright, fine. Feeglgeef (talk) 06:27, 8 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Not done WF:Broad is an essay and cannot be used as a reason for deletion. --Ameisenigel (talk) 16:24, 9 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
WF:BROAD is not the reason for deletion. It being a duplicate is the reason for deletion. Feeglgeef (talk) 05:19, 10 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Ameisenigel (talk) 16:24, 9 November 2024 (UTC)Reply