Michelle Young's Letter To Cressida Dick
Michelle Young's Letter To Cressida Dick
Michelle Young's Letter To Cressida Dick
I refer to the front page news report in the Sunday Times newspaper last weekend and follow-up
article on Page 7 of the same edition, in which it is reported the Metropolitan Police will, at last, be
investigating the circumstances surrounding my late husband Scot's horrific death.
As you will know, I am the victim of fraudulent insolvency proceedings. This is supported by clear
evidence of substantial fraud. The court has traced substantial assets running into millions of
pounds and further assets, running into further millions, confirmed by details on a forensically-
recovered hard disk drive, resulting in many millions more being located. There is still much more
involved and these monies must not be allowed to be fraudulently laundered away from the rightful
beneficiary and owner, this being my family estate.
What is of considerable concern is the absence of forensic investigation of Scot's death. Even
retired police officers have voiced concerns about this.
• the flat whose window it is claimed he fell from, resulting in him becoming impaled on
railings at street level, was not treated as a crime scene and sealed and access restricted to
police officers and forensic scene examiners;
• Scot's then girlfriend, Noelle Reno, was allowed access to the flat the day following his
death and was found shredding documents which may have provided valuable information
as to what was happening in the days or weeks leading up to Scot's death and who may have
information which may lead to the identification of a person or persons with knowledge of
events on the day of Scot's death or those responsible for his death;
• police officers who allegedly investigated Scot's death concluded he had committed suicide,
but H.M. Coroner for the City of Westminster found this to be doubtful and recorded a
verdict which reflected the Coroner's findings;
• a man of considerable wealth and assets and no known worries or concerns should allegedly
throw himself out of an upper floor window and just happen to become impaled on railings
at street level, resulting in his death;
• a man with a family should not have some sort of safety net in place which, in the event of
his death, would provide for his family;
• a man with considerable wealth and assets should not have some sort of safety net in place
which, in the event of catastrophic failure of business interests would provide for his family;
• given the extent of Scot's investments, wealth, assets and business interests, running into
many billions of pounds, should suddenly plummet to zero;
• given the extent of Scot's investments, wealth, assets and business interests, running into
many billions of pounds, which his family would inherit by succession and under probate,
why claim should be laid to this fortune by insolvency practitioners claming Scot was
bankrupt, but not providing any evidence to substantiate their claims.
There are many questions about Scot's death and alleged bankruptcy which remained unanswered.
The post-mortem examination and toxicology reports need to be reviewed as a matter of urgency to
glean any information as to what caused Scot's sudden and violent death and, most importantly, who
was responsible for his death. Not only this, the insolvency practitioners and solicitors who claim he
is bankrupt need to be investigated as a matter of urgency in order to prevent Scot's wealth and
assets disappearing and my assets and wealth suffering the same fate.
Where is the evidence to substantiate the insolvency practitioners and solicitor's claims of
insolvency on Scot's part and, also, on my part? Given Scot's and my own individual wealth and
assets the claims being made by the insolvency practitioners and solitictors defy logic,
commonsense and any reasonable person will be asking serious questions of them and the members
of the judiciary who have, effectively, rubber-stamped the Bankruptcy Petitions and Orders without
subjecting the claims of insolvency to rigorous and robust examination and strict proof. This has not
been done.
Commissioner Dick, I welcome your announcement to initiate an investigation into Scot's death,
especially in the light of new evidence which has become available. Can I also ask that you link the
investigation into Scot's death with an investigation into the suspicious and fraudulent bankruptcy
involving Scot's wealth, assets and business interests, as well as my own, as it would not surprise
me in the least if these are linked.
I thank you for taking the time and trouble to read this letter.
Yours sincerely,
Michelle Young