The Difference Between Information & Knowledge: Confidential-For Kagashin Clients Only May, 2014
The Difference Between Information & Knowledge: Confidential-For Kagashin Clients Only May, 2014
The Difference Between Information & Knowledge: Confidential-For Kagashin Clients Only May, 2014
Forestry&Logging
2% Fishing
Community Agriculture 1%
15% 12%
Mining
2%
Financing, Insurance Manufacturing
18% 14%
Electricity
2%
Transport Construction
7% Trade, Hotels& 8%
Restaurant
19%
1200.00 11.6%
12.0%
12.3%
1000.00 12.3%
13.4%
14.3%
800.00 15.5% 14.7%
16.0%
600.00
400.00
200.00
0.00
2004- 2005- 2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 2011- 2012-
05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13
% Share 16.0% 15.5% 14.7% 14.3% 13.4% 12.3% 12.3% 12.0% 11.6%
Agriculture 79.44 83.83 87.29 92.83 92.57 92.95 101.14 105.09 106.89
Total GDP 495.24 542.18 594.06 649.44 693.11 752.68 822.83 873.93 917.57
151.8
155 147.7
CAGR:3.3%
150
145 138
136.5 136.6
140
135 129
130
125
120
115
FY'07 FY'08 FY'09 FY'10 FY'11 FY'12
GDP by value added
May, 2014 Confidential- For Kagashin clients only
Source: Ministry of Agriculture
Budget FY14: Agriculture remains priority
• Allocation of USD 145.8 billion for agriculture credit, an increase of USD 26.04 billion over last year
• Total plan outlay for agriculture in FY 14 raised to USD 3.56 billion from USD 2.87 billion in FY 2013
• Allocation of USD 208.3 million under scheme of Bringing Green Revolution to Eastern India (BGREI)
• National Food Security Mission, a scheme to bridge yields gap of major crops provided USD 468.7
million
• Funds for the Integrated Watershed Programme FY14 increased from USD 0.6 billion to USD 1.12
billion in FY13
Rice 1.66 5.95 1.55 0.13 4.10 1.42 0.84 5.43 3.32 2.82 4 1.24 3.77 1.9 2.54 0.21 40.88
Wheat 4.89 9.73 2.94 0.01 0.23 1.35 0.32 2.14 3.53 2.52 0.05 0.36 0.37 28.44
Total Pulses 5.19 2.42 3.27 4.36 1.93 2.3 0.96 0.16 0.52 0.83 0.18 0.81 0.67 23.60
Cotton 0.71 4.13 0.47 1.88 0.55 2.96 0.56 0.64 11.90
Soybean 5.67 3.01 0.9 0.13 0.19 9.90
Bajra 0.18 0.89 0.84 5.02 0.07 0.29 0.87 0.58 0.05 8.79
Gram 3.04 0.58 1.05 1.43 0.57 0.8 0.24 0.02 0.06 0.24 8.03
Maize 0.86 0.79 0.88 1.05 0.86 1.35 0.52 0.10 0.68 0.13 0.22 0.28 0.29 8.01
Jowar 0.39 0.19 3.38 0.55 0.28 1.14 0.12 0.07 0.2 6.32
Groundnut 0.21 0.3 0.42 1.31 0.68 1.69 0.07 0.39 5.07
Rapeseed & 4.61
Mustard 0.79 2.5 0.42 0.09 0.03 0.54 0.24
Arhar(TUR) 0.53 1.23 0.48 0.77 0.24 0.03 0.14 3.42
Sugarcane 1.02 0.20 0.43 0.22 0.08 0.35 0.03 0.11 2.44
Sesamum 0.36 0.36 0.11 0.55 0.12 0.09 0.19 0.30 0.02 0.05 0.01 2.16
Potato 0.08 0.52 0.03 0.04 0.39 0.15 0.06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.09 1.39
Mangoes 0.25 0.17 0.38 0.14 0.07 0.16 0.14 0.01 1.33
Jute 0.6 0.13 0.07 0.80
Chillies 0.05 0.01 0.10 0.20 0.11 0.06 0.08 0.01 0.05 0.02 0.69
Masoor 0.59 0.59
Onion 0.06 0.18 0.05 0.04 0.16 0.01 0.03 0.54
Sunflower 0.38 0.02 0.40
Tobacco 0.12 0.15 0.27
Garlic 0.06 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.14
Ragi 0.04 0.04
Pome Fruits 0.02 0.02 0.04
Grapes 0.04 0.04
Total 25.31 21.73 21.31 20.40 12.60 11.21 9.94 7.68 7.43 7.21 5.82 5.78 4.86 4.12 3.06 0.65 0.21 0.48 169.82
Major Crops Production
Production: Million tonnes
• Favorable demographics
Growth Drivers
• Growing
• Hybrid &
institutional credit
genetically
modified seeds
• Increasing MSP’s
• Mechanization
Supply-side • Introduction of new
Policy Support
drivers schemes
• Irrigation facilities
• Opening up of
• Green Revolution
exports of wheat
in Eastern India Confidential- For Kagashin clients only and rice
Why India..?
Advantage India
Competitive advantages Policy Support
• Increasing MSP
• High proportion of agricultural land • Schemes to incentivize states to
increase private investment in
• Leading producer of jute, pulses; agriculture and allied sectors
second largest producer of wheat, • Launched National Food Security
paddy, fruits and vegetables Mission (NFSM) to increase food
production
• Average size of the holdings declined from 2.28 hectares in 1970-71 to 1.16 hectares in
2010-11
Water Management
Climate Change
•Impact due to climate changes is expected to cause a drop between 4.5 and 9
percent by 2039 and by 25 percent by 2099
Rural Credit
•Over- regulation has led to increased costs, price risks and uncertainty
Fertilizer Overuse
Industry Structure
Formulator
Weeds
33%
Diseases
26%
Sugarcane Others
2% 1%
Paddy
18%
Plantation &
Crops
Source: Industry reports, Analysis by Tata Strategic
Maharashtr
Gujrat, 0.08
Tamil a
Nadu Gujrat Punjab 13%
5% 7% 11%
Maharashtra,
0.32 MP&
Uttar Chhattisgar
Pradesh, h
0.10 8% Karnataka
7%
Andhra Chattisgarh,
Pradesh, 0.37 0.06 Rajasthan,
0.08
CAGR of 14.7% expected during FY'2014-FY'2018 in the Indian crop protection business
COUNTRY WISE PESTICIDE CONSUMPTION No. OF PRODUCT REGISTERED INDIAN CROP YEILDS
Pulses 40-88 1: 4
Thailand 1.37 USA 755
Sugarcane 8-23 1 : 13
Indonesia 0.58 Vegetables 30-60 1: 7
INDIA 210
INDIA 0.38 Fruits 20-35 1: 4
Support for Integrated Pest Management (IPM) & rising demand for
organic farming
•More demand for agrochemicals for kharif crops (~70% of annual consumption of
Pesticides)
•In India, registration of new products takes 3-5 years which discourages domestic
manufacturers
Growth Drivers
• Increase in Wages & Scarcity along with consistent increased farmer’s awareness driving Herbicide
demand
• Growing demand of Fruits & Vegetables due to change in dietary pattern leading to more
demand for Fungicides & Plant Nutrition Products
Production of 37.6 Mn tonnes (9% rise yoy) of fertilizer in the year 2012-13
Capital Investment
•Has more than USD 95 Billion investment
Corporate Development
Regional development
•States having fertilizers plants have a positive impact on their economy
Employment
•Support given to 3.5 lakh families during the last three decades
284
204.9 188.3
156.1
122.1 114 101
30
25
20
N
15
P2O5
10
K2O
5
0 Total
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
Million MT
25
20
15
Urea
10 DAP
Complex
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
May, 2014 Confidential- For Kagashin clients only
Imports
million MT
Year N P K Total Major product imports
2011-’12
2005-06 1.39 1.145 2.764 5.299
2006-07 2.704 1.373 2.076 6.153 Urea 7.80
2007-08 3.708 1.391 2.668 7.767 DAP 6.90
2008-09 3.756 3.067 3.417 10.239
NP/NPK 4.41
2009-10 3.488 2.85 3.19 9.528
MoP 4.00
2010-11 4.57 3.739 3.896 12.205
5
4
3 N
P
2
K
1
0
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
• Setting up JV projects in countries having abundant and cheaper raw material resources
• Exploring the use of alternative energy sources like liquefied natural gas, coal gasification,
etc. to overcome the constraints in the availability of conventional energy sources
• Looking at possibilities of revival of some of the closed units by setting up Brownfield units
subject to availability of gas
Current status
Production
• New JV’s
• Manufacturing expertise
May, 2014 Confidential- For Kagashin clients only
Challenges
• Efficiency
Decreasing efficiency of fertilizers due to lack of R&D , wastage and improper handling
• Investment
This sector is characterized by low investment
• Capacity
Insufficient capacity to meet growing demand
• Competition
Indian production cost (high) and quality (low) compared to international standards
- Availability of right mix of nutrients according to soil and crop needs at reasonable prices
Impact of NBS
2010-2011
- Low benchmark prices in the beginning led to delay in import decisions resulting in availability constraints
during initial Kharif, 2011
- Revised benchmark prices enabled improved availability from September 2011 onwards
- Mopping of subsidy on closing stocks of previous FY created uncertainty about stability of the policy
- Better urea pricing, reduce the government’s subsidy bill and Balanced Fertilization
Potential Impact
- Shift from “fixed price- floating subsidy” to “fixed subsidy- floating price”
- Improved pricing flexibility for the industry, reduced Government’s fertilizer subsidy bill
- Shall address the issue of gas availability and it’s pricing
- Encourage investments in Green-field projects which may become viable and attractive
- Incentivize plans to enhance indigenous urea capacities by about 8 million tonnes/year, including
self sufficiency in coming years
USD Billion
2.50 2.25
0.50
0.00
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Vegetables
other 18%
1%
Cotton
Sunflower 34%
2%
Sorghum&
Millets
3% Maize
12%
Wheat Paddy
12% 18%
Total Indian Seed market (6th position in world) – 1.83 USD Bn as of FY’2013.
India cotton seed sales in 2012 - $658 Mn (66.4% of Asia & 34.8 % of global consumption)
Source-Industry & Primary Source, Ken Research
SRR in hybrids crops like Cotton, Sunflower, Bajra, and Jowar is 100%
•Due to PPV & FR Act, the private sector’s participation has increased in R & D of Open
Pollinated varieties, particularly in Rice and wheat
•Govt. FDI allowance in selected agri- sectors including seed production attracts investment
Current Status
accounts for 80%
turnover in seed
• Indian seed sector has grown @ 12% compared to <5% growth of global seed market
• Private sector investing in self pollinated crops to develop and promote new varieties
• Seed replacement ratio continues to be low
– Large acres of self pollinated crops – rice, wheat, legumes, etc.
– Low hybrid adoption rates in most crops due to marginal growing conditions and/or
subsistence farming
• Medium and small sized companies are making investments in research and seed processing infrastructure
Cotton 14 23 65% 30
Corn 45 65 45% 80
Rice 9 19 110% 40
Tomato
Regular 22 26 35
TLCV Rest Oval 2 5 20
TLCV Rest Acidic 0 17 7
BWR Rest 0.50 2 3
Watermelon 40 70 85
Melon 7 12 15
Chilli Pepper 20 35 55
Okra 250 900 1300
Cabbage 30 50 60
Cauliflower 20 40 50
Brinjal 15 25 35
Ridgegourd 7 27 42
Bittergourd 15 50 70
Bottlegourd 25 50 70
Bell Pepper 0.50 1.50 2
Carrot 12 25
Cucumber 25 50
Impact of new technology on Cotton
• More than 150 Bt cotton hybrids are now available for the farmer to choose from
• More than 80% of the country’s cotton growing area is under Bt cotton
• Cotton production has increased from 12.5 million bales in 2002-03 to 31 million bales in 2007-08
• India has become the second largest producer and second largest exporter of cotton in the world
– Destructive Insects and Pests Act, 1914 – Plants, Fruits and Seeds (Regulation of import in India) Order 1989
– Cotton Seed Acts in some states
• Self certification through registration of seed producers and accreditation of seed testing labs
- Registration after 2 years of VCU testing
- No provisional registration of transgenic hybrids/varieties
- Duplication of agronomic testing of transgenic hybrids/varieties under EPA and New Seed
Bill
- Performance label and compensation
- Price Control
- Complete exemption of farmers form the operation of the Seed Bill
- Security of the material during field testing for DUS still to be established
– Restricting exchange of germplasm even of those crops which are covered in the ITPGR
– Lead to cost cutting even in critical processes – could affect seed quality adversely
Export/Import regulations
– Inconsistent and politically motivated for commercial seed
• Last mile gap (in remote areas) in the delivery / distribution channels
• Abiotic stresses
– Drought
• Low or erratic rainfall in rainfed situations
• Light soils with poor water holding capacity
• Inability to irrigate enough or on time
– Water logging
• Poor drainage
• Excessive rainfall
– Sub optimal temperatures
– Saline soils
– Nutrient deficiencies
• Biotic stresses
• Success achieved
• Use of Molecular markers
– Bollworm resistance in cotton
– Stacking of traits
• Other traits of importance
– Increasing breeding gains
– Weed management
– Accelerating product development cycles
– Insect resistance in other crops
– Quality assurance
– Nutritional enhancement
– Protection of IP
– Disease resistance
– Product fit
– Economic benefit
– Freedom to choose
– Harmonization of various laws and Uniform enactment of central laws across all states
• Indian seed industry needs policy support to make even bigger contributions in the future:
• Robust PPP models are needed to better serve the farmers by removing the various productivity constraints