HGDG Table 1 and 2
HGDG Table 1 and 2
HGDG Table 1 and 2
Element (col. 2)
and Score for Gender
an item/ issues
item/ques
element* identified
tion No Partly Yes (col. 3) (col. 4)
(col.1) (2a) (2b) (2c)
1.0
Involve
ment of
women
and
men
(max
score: 2;
for each
item, 1)
/ 2
1.1
Participat
ion of
women
and men
in
beneficia
ry groups
in
identifica
tion of
the
problem
(possible
scores: 0,
0.5,
1.0)
/ 1
1.2
Participat
ion of
women
and men
in
beneficia
ry groups
in project
design
(possible
scores: 0,
0.5, 1.0)
/ 1
2.0
Collecti
on of
sex-
disaggr
egated
data
and
gender-
related
informa
tion
(possibl
e scores:
0, 1.0,
2.0)
/ 2
3.0
Conduc
t of
gender
analysis
and
identific
ation of
gender
issues
(max
score: 2;
for each
item, 1)
/ 1
3.1
Analysis
of gender
gaps and
inequaliti
es related
to gender
roles,
perspecti
ves and
needs, or
access to
and
control of
resources
(possible
scores: 0,
0.5, 1.0)
/ 1
3.2
Analysis
of
constrain
ts and
opportuni
ties
related to
women
and
men’s
participat
ion in the
project
(possible
scores:
0, 0.5,
1.0)
/ 1
4.0
Gender
equality
goals,
outcom
es, and
outputs
(possibl
e scores:
0, 1.0,
2.0)
Does
the
project
have
clearly-
stated
gender
equality
goals,
objectiv
es,
outcom
es or
outputs
?
/ 1
Microsoft Word - Expanded box 7 _combined Boxes 5-6 Generic_.doc
Done?
(col. 2)
1
5.0
Matchin
g of
strategi
es with
gender
issues
(possibl
e scores:
0, 1.0,
2.0)
Do the
strategi
es and
activitie
s match
the
gender
issues
and
gender
equality
goals
identifie
d?
6.0 / 0.67
Gender
analysis
of
likely
impacts
of the
project
(max
score: 2;
for each
item,
0.67)
6.1 Are
women
and girl
children
among
the direct
or
indirect
beneficia
ries?
(possible
scores: 0,
0.33,
0.67)
/ 0.33
6.2 Has / 0.67
the
project
considere
d its
long-
term
impact
on
women’s
socioeco
nomic
status
and
empower
ment?
(possible
scores: 0,
0.33,
0.67)
6.3 Has / 0.33
the
project
included
strategies
for
avoiding
or
minimizi
ng
negative
impacts
on
women’s
status
and
welfare?
(possible
scores: 0,
0.33,
0.67)
7.0
Monitor
ing
targets
and
indicato
rs
(possibl
e scores:
0, 1.0,
2.0)
Does
the
project
include
gender
equality
targets
and
indicato
rs to
measure
gender
equality
outputs
and
outcom
es?
8.0 Sex- / 1
disaggr
egated
databas
e
require
ment
(possibl
e scores:
0, 1.0,
2.0)
Does
the
project
M&E
system
require
the
collectio
n of sex-
disaggr
egated
data?
9.0
Resourc
es (max
score: 2;
for each
questio
n, 1)
/ 1
9.1 Is the / 0.5
budget
allotted
by the
project
sufficient
for
gender
equality
promotio
n or
integrati
on? OR,
will the
project
tap
counterp
art funds
from
LGUs/par
tners for
its GAD
efforts?
(possible
scores: 0,
0.5, 1.0)
9.2 Does / 0.5
the
project
have the
expertise
to
promote
gender
equality
and
women’s
empower
ment?
OR, is the
project
committi
ng itself
to invest
project
staff time
in
building
capacitie
s within
the
project to
integrate
GAD or
promote
gender
equality?
(possible
scores: 0,
0.5, 1.0)
10
Relatio
nship
with the
agency’
s
GAD
efforts
(max
score: 2;
for each
questio
n or
item,
0.67)
/ 0.67
10.1 Will / 0.67
the
project
build on
or
strengthe
n the
agency/N
CRFW/
governm
ent’s
commitm
ent to the
empower
ment of
women?
(possible
scores: 0,
0.33,
0.67)
IF THE
AGENCY
HAS NO
GAD
PLAN:
Will the
project
help
towards
the
formulati
on of the
impleme
nting
agency’s
GAD
plan?
10.2 Will
it build
on the
initiative
s or
actions of
other
organizat
ions in
the area?
(possible
scores: 0,
0.33,
0.67)
/ 0.33
10.3 / 0.33
Does the
project
have an
exit plan
that will
ensure
the
sustainab
ility of
GAD
efforts
and
benefits?
(possible
scores: 0,
0.33,
0.67)