HGDG PIMME FIMME (hEALTH AND nUTRITION PROGRAM 2021)

HEALTH AND NUTRITION PROGRAM
Box 16. GAD checklist for project management and implementation

Response Score
(col. 2) for the
Element and guide question Partly item or
(col. 1) No Yes Yes element
(2a) (2b) (2c) (col. 3)
1.0 Supportive project management (max score: 2; for each item, 1.0) 2.0
1.1 Is the project leadership (project steering/advisory committee or management)
supportive of GAD or gender equality goals? For instance, has it mobilized
adequate resources to support strategies that address gender issues or / 1.0
constraints to women's and men's participation during project implementation?
(possible scored: 0,0.5,1.0)
1.2 Has adequate gender expertise been made available throughout the project?
For example, are gender issues adequately addressed in the project / 1.0
management contract and scope of services? (possible scored: 0,0.5,1.0)
2.0 Technically competent staff of consultants (max score: 2; for each item, 0.67) 1.67
2.1 Are the project staff member technically prepared to promote gender equality
or integrate GAD in their respective positions/locations? OR, is there an
individual or group responsible for promoting gender equality in the project?
/ 0.67
OR, has the project tapped local gender experts to assist its staff/partners in
integrating gender equality in their activities or in project operations?
(possible scores: 0,0.33,0.67)
2.2 Does the project require the presence of women and men in the project
/ 0.67
implementation team? (possible scores: 0,0.33,0.67)
2.3 Does project require its monitoring and evaluation team (personnel or
consultants) to have technical competence for GAD evaluation? (possible / 0.33
scores: 0,0.33,0.67)
3.0 Committed Philippine government agency (max score: 2; for each item, 1) 1.0
3.1 Are regular agency personnel involved in implementing project GAD
initiatives? OR, are agency officials or personnel participating in GAD / 0.5
training sponsored by the project? (possible socres: 0,0.5,1.0)
3.2 Has the agency included the project's GAD efforts in its GAD plans?
/ 0.5
4.0 GAD implementation processes and procedures (max score: 2,
1.75
for each item, 0.5)
4.1 Do project implementation documents incorporate a discussion of GAD
concerns? IF APPLICABLE: Are subproject proposals required to have
/ 0.50
explicit GAD objectives and to have been supported by gender analysis?
4.2 Does the project have an operation GAD strategy? Alternately, has the
project been effective in intergrating GAD into the development activity? / 0.25
4.3 Does the project have a budget for activities that will build capcities for
doing GAD tasks (gender analysis, monitoring, etc.) (possible scores: 0, / 0.50
0.25,0.50)
4.4 Does the project involve women and men in various phases of subprojects?
/ 0.50
TOTAL GAD SCORE - PROJECT MANAGEMENT 6.42
GAD Checklist for Project Management, and Monitoring and Evaluation 4

Box 17. GAD checklist for project monitoring and implementation
Response Score
(col. 2) for the
(2a) (2b) (2c) (col. 3)
1.0 Project monitoring system being used by the project includes indicators
that measure gender differences in outputs, resultys, and outcomes. 2.00
(max score: 2, for each item, 1)
1.1 Does the project require gender0sensitive outputs and outcomes?

/ 1.0
1.2 Does the project monitor its activities, inputs, outputs, and results using
/ 1.0
GAD or gender equality indicators? (possible scores: 0,0.5,1.0)
2.0 Project database includes sex-disaggregated and gender-related information.

1.75
(max score: 2, for each item, 1)
2.1 Does the project support studies to assess gender issues and impacts? OR,
have sex-disaggregated data been collected on the project's impact on women
and men in connection with welfare, access to resources and benefits, / 0.50
awareness or conscousness raising, participation, and control?
(possible scores: 0.0.25,0.50)
2.2 Have sex-disaggregated data been collected on the distribution of project

resources to women and men, and on the participation of women and men in
project activities and in decision making? IF APPLICABLE: Does the project / 0.50
require its subprojects to include sex-disaggregated data in their reports?
(possible scores: 0.0.25,0.50)
2.3 Do project and subproject reports include sex-disaggregated data or cover

gender rquality of GAD concerns, initiatives, and resultys (that is, information 0.25
on gender issues and how these are addressed)? (possible scores: 0,0.25,0.50)
/
2.4 Are sex-disaggregated data being "rolled up" from the field to the national / 0.50
level? (possible scored: 0,0.25,0.50)
3.0 Gender equality and women's empowerment targets are being met. 3.0
(max score: 4)
3.1 Has women's welfare and status been improves as a result of the project?
1.0
Examples of indicators:
• The project has helped in raising the education levels and health status of disadvantages groups of women.
• Women's access to productive resources, employment opportunities, and political and legal status has improved.
• The project has created new opportunities or roles for women and men.
• Men and women have been sensitized to gender issues and women's human rights.
• The project has supported or instituted strategies to overcome any adverse effects on women.

Box 17. GAD checklist for project monitoring and implementation
Response Score
(col. 2) for the
(2a) (2b) (2c) (col. 3)
• The project has introduces follow-up activities to promote the sustainability of its gender equality results.
• There are project initiatives to ensure that improvements in the status of women and girls will be sustained and
supported after project completion.
3.2 Has the project helped in developing the capacity of the implementing
agency for implementing gender-sensitive projects? / 2.0
4.0 Project addresses gender issues arising from or during its implementation.
Has the project responded to gender issues that were identified during / 2.0
project implementation or M&E? OR: Has the project addressed gender
issues arising from its implementation?
Examples of gender issues:
• Negative effects on the gender relationship as a result of new roles or resources created for women.
• Additional workloads for women and men
• Displacement of women by men
• Loss of access to resources because of project rules
5.0 Patricipatory monitoring and evaluation processes (max score: 2;

1.5
for each item, 1)
5.1 Does the project involve or consult woman and man implementators during
project monitoring and evaluation? Does it involve woman and man / 1.0
beneficiaries? (possible scores: 0,0.5,1.0)
5.2 Have women and men been involved in or consulted on the assessment of
0.50
the gender impacts of the project (possible scores: 0,0.5,1.0)
/
TOTAL GAD SCORE - MONITORING AND EVALUATION (from box 17) 10.25
TOTAL GAD SCORE - PROJECT MANAGEMENT (from box 16) 6.42
TOTAL GAD SCORE - PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION 16.5

HGDG PIMME FIMME (hEALTH AND nUTRITION PROGRAM 2021)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

HGDG PIMME FIMME (hEALTH AND nUTRITION PROGRAM 2021)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

HGDG PIMME FIMME (hEALTH AND nUTRITION PROGRAM 2021)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

HEALTH AND NUTRITION PROGRAM

Box 16. GAD checklist for project management and implementation

GAD Checklist for Project Management, and Monitoring and Evaluation 4

1.1 Does the project require gender0sensitive outputs and outcomes?

2.0 Project database includes sex-disaggregated and gender-related information.

2.2 Have sex-disaggregated data been collected on the distribution of project

2.3 Do project and subproject reports include sex-disaggregated data or cover

GAD Checklist for Project Management, and Monitoring and Evaluation 6

5.0 Patricipatory monitoring and evaluation processes (max score: 2;

TOTAL GAD SCORE - PROJECT MANAGEMENT (from box 16) 6.42

TOTAL GAD SCORE - PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION 16.5

GAD Checklist for Project Management, and Monitoring and Evaluation 7

You might also like