The document describes a study on training flight engineers for the Army Air Forces during World War 2. It discusses the development and challenges of creating selection tests and training programs for this new role given the urgent need for flight engineers and changing demands of the B-29 bomber program.
The document describes a study on training flight engineers for the Army Air Forces during World War 2. It discusses the development and challenges of creating selection tests and training programs for this new role given the urgent need for flight engineers and changing demands of the B-29 bomber program.
The document describes a study on training flight engineers for the Army Air Forces during World War 2. It discusses the development and challenges of creating selection tests and training programs for this new role given the urgent need for flight engineers and changing demands of the B-29 bomber program.
The document describes a study on training flight engineers for the Army Air Forces during World War 2. It discusses the development and challenges of creating selection tests and training programs for this new role given the urgent need for flight engineers and changing demands of the B-29 bomber program.
tion procedure than to complete significant studies. The insurmount-
able variation in performance contributed by the complex factors in aircraft operation attenuated the reliability of the radar bombing error scores, just as it did in other attempts to obtain criteria of aerial per- formance. The complexities of validating selection tests are thoroughly dis- cussed in a penultimate chapter describing the results of two studies employing three batteries of selection tests validated against training course grades, against an air-crew classification "radar stanine," and, in part, against radar bombing error calculated from camera records obtained during aerial training flights. In spite of the besetting difficul- ties, a number of significant correlations were obtained. Since the results of these studies were available too late for application in the wartime selection program, their greatest value will lie in indicating to the uninitiated the practical problems which will be present in develop- ing and evaluating tests of this sort. A final chapter summarizes the principal points of the text and in addition discusses several areas in which training research was planned, including the fields of selecting and training instructors, and of organiz- ing the training curriculum. C. S. BRIDGMAN. Navy Special Devices Center. DAILEY, J. T. (Eo.) Psychological research on flight engineer training. AAF Aviation Psychology Program Research Reports, Report No. 13. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1947. Pp. iii + 227. $1.25. When the Pearl Harbor debacle gave rise to the immediate necessity of replacing heavy bombardment aircraft in the Pacific, the Army Air Forces decided, because civilian aircraft had handled the route successfully, to fly in the replacements from San Francisco. So many of the planes, however, crash landed at sea from fuel shortages that the Army Air Forces called in civilian companies for consultation. From their experience with long overseas flights, Pan American Airways had found it necessary to add a new crew member whose task it was to plan the flight from the standpoint of thorough knowledge of the mechanics of the craft. Fuel consumption, for example, was found to vary tre- mendously with the power setting, and one of the major duties of the new position, flight engineer, was to compute the optimal power setting. It took Pan American two and one-half years to train a flight en- gineer, but the Air Forces in 1942 did not have two and one-half years. The designs of the B-29 had been on the drawing board since the be- ginning of the war and were to be in production in 1943, so the Air Forces set in a training program immediately at various schools in the south- 520 ARMY AIR FORCES AVIATION PSYCHOLOGY PROGRAM west. In 1944 some officers of the Psychological Research Unit No. 2 were assigned the task of preliminary investigation of the requirements and special characteristics desirable for B-29 crew members, and in 1945 the Psychological Research Project (Flight Engineer) was ac- tivated with specific directives for the selection and training of flight engineers. The present report is a history (ch. 1) and description of the work of this project. It is notable for its account of work completed (chs. 4 & 5) in the face of what can only be called major difficulties. Con- sider, for example, the problem of establishing evaluative and selective criteria (ch. 2) for a new and complex position (1) when the student personnel varied from enlisted men with air mechanic experience to officer graduates of the Yale Technical Training Command Engineer's Officer Candiate School with B-29 training from the Boeing Factory School; (2) when the curriculum was under constant revision of load, content, and geographical locus; (3) when there were long delays and sometimes failures in procurement of mock B-29 equipment; and, finally, (4) the fact that urgent need for flight engineers resulted in extremely few failures and wash-backs, thus vitiating even the simple evaluative aid of grading systems. It is no wonder that many of the research cri- teria proved to be subjective; and the authors point out the need in this respect of long-time research studies. An appendix to the report in- cludes copies of developed check lists, rating scales, and samples of items from the Flight Engineer Proficiency test. The job analysis of flight engineer (ch. 3) indicated a responsible and key job in the airplane although the position in the command hierarchy was never specifically established. The flight engineer's duties involved the preparation of the flight plan, pre-flight craft inspection, starting procedures, proper operation of the power plant throughout flight, keep- ing flight log, post-flight inspection, and writing a post-flight summary report for the ground maintenance crew. His flight station was in the forward pressurized compartment and his instrument panel contained 36 dials, and a control stand fitted with 28 toggle-switches and 14 levers. He had primary authority in emergencies which endangered the loss of the plane. The sixth and final chapter evaluates the research. Compromises between theory and practice resulted in only moderate successes, but valuables ones nevertheless for clearing the beginning ground of what will certainly be important research of the future. There is a straight- faced inclusion among the factors listed as influencing the trend of re- search: cessation of hostilities. The word "temporary" can almost be heard. G. RAYMOND STONE. University of Oklahoma.