Syllabus-Logic CriticalThinking
Syllabus-Logic CriticalThinking
Syllabus-Logic CriticalThinking
VISION
The First City Providential College shall be a world-class university for lifelong learning.
MISSION
First City Providential College shall:
1. Offer relevant and multidisciplinary academic programs to produce lifelong learners who are
globally competitive and socially responsible professionals.
2. Produce viable researches for local and international publication and utilization.
3. Implement collaborative and sustainable community extension services.
MISSION
PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES
1. Course Code :
2. Course Title : LOGIC AND CRITICAL THINKING
3. Pre-requisite : none
4. No. of units for lec & lab : 3 units
5. No. of contact hrs.per wk. : 3 units lecture
6. Program Outcomes : a-I, d-I, e-P, j-P, k-P
7. Course Description : This course aims to introduce students to practices of argumentation, critical
analysis, and evaluation. Such skills in critical thinking are integral to the discipline of philosophy, which will give a
distinctive edge in a wide variety of careers and courses of study. This will also be useful in other academic
domains, in the workplace, and in everyday life. Thus, it aims to help students to understand and develop the skills
required for critical thinking, and to encourage them to explore the ways in which these skills can further their
academic and non-academic pursuits.
BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN NURSING
8. Program Outcomes and Relationship to Program Educational Objectives
Program Educational Objectives
Program Outcomes 1 2 3
Apply knowledge of physical, social, natural and health
(a) √ √
sciences, and humanities in the practice of nursing. √
Provide safe, appropriate and holistic care to individuals,
(b √ √
families, population groups and community utilizing nursing √
)
process.
Apply guidelines and principles of evidence-based practice in the
delivery of care.
(c) √ √ √
(m) Adopt the nursing core values in the practice of the profession.
√ √ √
11. Textbook/References:
Textbook:
Tubo, Dennis. Logic for Right Living. Manila. Unlimited Books Library Services and Publishing Inc., 2017.
Other References:
Maano, Ricky. In Defense of Logic. Malabon City: Mutya Publishing House, Inc., 2016
Grading System:
The final grades will correspond to the weighted average scores shown below:
1.00 100-98
1.25 97-94
1.50 93-90
1.75 89-86
2.00 85-83
2.25 82-79
2.50 78-75
2.75 74-70
4.00 Failure
INC Incomplete
No Grade (Due to absences
NG
more than 20% of class days)
IP In Progress
D. Submission of Assessments/Outputs
1. All subject assessments and outputs must be submitted on time. Considerations could only be
given if there had been proper communication between the instructor and the student prior to
the dates of submission.
C. During assessment
I:
1. observe honesty in answering all exercises, formative assessments and other written
examinations.
2. take major examinations on the scheduled date and time.
3. work collaboratively with my classmates and teachers in doing performance-based
assessments.
4. communicate with all my subject teachers in improving my academic and behavioral
performance.
II. Offline/ Modular Distance Learning
I:
1. follow the required number of learning modules to be accomplished per week.
2. interact with the teachers and classmates through text, call or other free messaging apps.
3. accomplish my tasks and assignments diligently.
4. respect the intellectual property rights of the school. I refrain from prohibited reproduction and
sharing of learning resources.
5. ask assistance from my parents/guardians in doing laboratory/hands-on activities.
6. submit the accomplished learning modules on time.
7. observe honesty in answering all exercises, formative assessments and other written
examinations.
8. take major examinations on the scheduled date and time.
9. work collaboratively with my classmates and teachers in doing performance-based
assessments.
10. communicate with all my subject teachers in improving my academic and behavioral
performance.
Other Rules of Conduct:
1. The profile picture to be used in the NEO LMS should be the student’s own photo. He/she
should be wearing a decent look and proper attire. The photo should be posted in the upright
position.
2. Students should use only one definite email address to be used for the entire school year.
3. Students should use the NEO LMS in sending messages and concerns to the subject teachers.
4. Students have the right to express themselves and participate freely in an online class.
However, they are expected to treat each other and the teacher with courtesy and respect.
Offensive or inappropriate language is not to be used in any form of communication e.g.,
emails, discussion postings, group projects, submitted assignments.
5. The discussion area of the course is reserved for postings related to course work only. Postings
of a personal or nonacademic nature are not permitted and may be removed by the instructor
should they appear. Grades and personal issues should be handled by private email to the
teacher.
6. Emails to the teacher that are considered offensive or inappropriate will be sent back to the
writer with a request to rewrite and resubmit. If the emails continue to be unacceptable, the
student will be referred to the Program Head and denied access to the course until the Dean
contacts the student. If students receive inappropriate emails from others in the class they
should notify the teacher and appropriate action will be taken.
7. Students are expected to submit work which is their own. Plagiarism or cheating will not be
tolerated.
F. Consultation Schedule
Consultation schedules with the instructors are posted outside the consultation room. Students
must first set an appointment to confirm the instructor’s availability.
Prepared by:
Committee Members:
Course Cluster Chair: John S. Flores, RN, MAN
CQI Cluster Chair: John S. Flores, RN, MAN
Members: Jev C. Domalaon, Ph. D.
Mary Aretha Rocha, RN, RM, MAN