2010 Navarro - v. - Ermita20180920 5466 Ta5meu PDF
2010 Navarro - v. - Ermita20180920 5466 Ta5meu PDF
2010 Navarro - v. - Ermita20180920 5466 Ta5meu PDF
RESOLUTION
PERALTA , J : p
Before us are two Motions for Reconsideration of the Decision dated February
10, 2010 — one led by the O ce of the Solicitor General (OSG) in behalf of public
respondents, and the other led by respondent Governor Geraldine Ecleo Villaroman,
representing the Province of Dinagat Islands. The dispositive portion of the Decision
reads:
W HE R E F O R E , the petition is G R A N T E D . Republic Act No. 9355,
otherwise known as An Act Creating the Province of Dinagat Islands, is hereby
declared unconstitutional. The proclamation of the Province of Dinagat Islands
and the election of the o cials thereof are declared N U L L a n d V O I D . The
provision in Article 9 (2) of the Rules and Regulations Implementing the Local
Government Code of 1991 stating, "The land area requirement shall not apply
where the proposed province is composed of one (1) or more islands," is declared
NULL and VOID.
The arguments of the movants are similar. The grounds for reconsideration of
Governor Villaroman can be subsumed under the grounds for reconsideration of the
OSG, which are as follows:
I.
II.
The power to create a local government unit is vested with the Legislature.
The acts of the Legislature and Executive in enacting into law RA 9355 should be
respected as petitioners failed to overcome the presumption of validity or
constitutionality.
As regards the rst ground, the movants reiterate the same arguments in their
respective Comments that aside from the undisputed compliance with the income
requirement, Republic Act (R.A.) No. 9355, creating the Province of Dinagat Islands, has
also complied with the population and land area requirements. acAIES
The arguments are unmeritorious and have already been passed upon by the
Court in its Decision, ruling that R.A. No. 9355 is unconstitutional, since it failed to
comply with either the territorial or population requirement contained in Section 461 of
R.A. No. 7160, otherwise known as the Local Government Code of 1991.
When the Dinagat Islands was proclaimed a new province on December 3, 2006,
it had an o cial population of only 106 ,9 5 1 based on the 2000 Census of Population
conducted by the National Statistics O ce (NSO), which population is short of the
statutory requirement of 250,000 inhabitants.
Although the Provincial Government of Surigao del Norte conducted a special
census of population in Dinagat Islands in 2003, which yielded a population count of
371,000, the result was not certi ed by the NSO as required by the Local Government
Cod e. 1 Moreover, respondents failed to prove that with the population count of
371,000, the population of the original unit (mother Province of Surigao del Norte)
would not be reduced to less than the minimum requirement prescribed by law at the
time of the creation of the new province. 2
Less than a year after the proclamation of the new province, the NSO conducted
the 2 0 0 7 Census of Population. The NSO certi ed that as of August 1, 2007, Dinagat
Islands had a total population of only 120,813, 3 which was still below the minimum
requirement of 250,000 inhabitants.
Based on the foregoing, R.A. No. 9355 failed to comply with the population
requirement of 250,000 inhabitants as certified by the NSO.
Moreover, the land area of the province failed to comply with the statutory
requirement of 2,000 square kilometers. R.A. No. 9355 speci cally states that the
Province of Dinagat Islands contains an approximate land area of 802.12 square
kilometers. This was not disputed by the respondent Governor of the Province of
Dinagat Islands in her Comment. She and the other respondents instead asserted that
the province, which is composed of more than one island, is exempted from the land
area requirement based on the provision in the Rules and Regulations Implementing the
Local Government Code of 1991 (IRR), speci cally paragraph 2 of Article 9 which
states that "[t]he land area requirement shall not apply where the proposed province is
composed of one (1) or more islands." The certi cate of compliance issued by the
Lands Management Bureau was also based on the exemption under paragraph 2,
Article 9 of the IRR.
However, the Court held that paragraph 2 of Article 9 of the IRR is null and void,
because the exemption is not found in Section 461 of the Local Government Code. 4
There is no dispute that in case of discrepancy between the basic law and the rules and
regulations implementing the said law, the basic law prevails, because the rules and
regulations cannot go beyond the terms and provisions of the basic law. 5
Provided, That, the creation thereof shall not reduce the land area,
population, and income of the original unit or units at the time of said
creation to less than the minimum requirements prescribed herein.
Justice Nachura contends that the stipulation in paragraph (b) quali es not
merely the word "contiguous" in paragraph (a) (i) in the same provision, but rather the
entirety of paragraph (a) (i) that reads:
(i) a contiguous territory of at least two thousand (2,000) square
kilometers, as certified by the Lands Management Bureau[.]7
He argues that the whole paragraph on contiguity and land area in paragraph (a)
(i) above is the one being referred to in the exemption from the territorial requirement in
paragraph (b). Thus, he contends that if the province to be created is composed of
islands, like the one in this case, then, its territory need not be contiguous and need not
have an area of at least 2,000 square kilometers. He asserts that this is because as the
law is worded, contiguity and land area are not two distinct and separate requirements,
but they qualify each other. An exemption from one of the two component
requirements in paragraph (a) (i) allegedly necessitates an exemption from the other
component requirement, because the non-attendance of one results in the absence of a
reason for the other component requirement to effect a qualification.
Similarly, the OSG contends that when paragraph (b) of Section 461 of the Local
Government Code provides that the "territory need not be contiguous if it comprises
two (2) or more islands," it necessarily dispenses the 2,000-sq.-km. land area
CD Technologies Asia, Inc. © 2018 cdasiaonline.com
requirement, lest such exemption would not make sense. The OSG argues that in
stating that a "territory need not be contiguous if it comprises two (2) or more islands,"
the law could not have meant to de ne the obvious. The land mass of two or more
islands will never be contiguous as it is covered by bodies of water. It is then but logical
that the territory of a proposed province that is composed of one or more islands need
not be contiguous or be at least 2,000 sq. kms.
The Court is not persuaded.
Section 7, Chapter 2 (entitled General Powers and Attributes of Local
Government Units) of the Local Government Code provides:
SEC. 7. Creation and Conversion. — As a general rule, the creation of a local
government unit or its conversion from one level to another level shall be based
o n veri able indicators of viability and projected capacity to provide
services , to wit:
It must be emphasized that Section 7 above, which provides for the general rule
in the creation of a local government unit, states in paragraph (c) thereof that the land
area must be contiguous and su cient to provide for such basic services and facilities
to meet the requirements of its populace.
Therefore, there are two requirements for land area: (1) the land area must be
contiguous; and (2) the land area must be su cient to provide for such basic services
and facilities to meet the requirements of its populace. A su cient land area in the
creation of a province is at least 2,000 square kilometers, as provided by Section 461
of the Local Government Code.
Thus, Section 461 of the Local Government Code, providing the requisites for the
creation of a province, speci cally states the requirement of "a contiguous territory
of at least two thousand (2,000) square kilometers . "
Hence, contrary to the arguments of both movants, the requirement of a
contiguous territory and the requirement of a land area of at least 2,000 square
kilometers are distinct and separate requirements for land area under paragraph (a) (i)
of Section 461 and Section 7 (c) of the Local Government Code.
Contrary to the contention of the movants, the exemption above pertains only to
the requirement of territorial contiguity. It clearly states that the requirement of
territorial contiguity may be dispensed with in the case of a province comprising two or
more islands, or is separated by a chartered city or cities which do not contribute to the
income of the province.
Nowhere in paragraph (b) is it expressly stated or may it be implied
that when a province is composed of two or more islands, or when the
territory of a province is separated by a chartered city or cities, such
province need not comply with the land area requirement of at least 2,000
square kilometers or the requirement in paragraph (a) (i) of Section 461 of
the Local Government Code. TIADCc
Where the law is free from ambiguity, the court may not introduce exceptions or
conditions where none is provided from considerations of convenience, public welfare,
or for any laudable purpose; 1 0 neither may it engraft into the law quali cations not
contemplated, 1 1 nor construe its provisions by taking into account questions of
expediency, good faith, practical utility and other similar reasons so as to relax non-
compliance therewith. 1 2 Where the law speaks in clear and categorical language, there
is no room for interpretation, but only for application. 1 3
Moreover, the OSG contends that since the power to create a local government
unit is vested with the Legislature, the acts of the Legislature and the Executive branch
in enacting into law R.A. No. 9355 should be respected as petitioners failed to
overcome the presumption of validity or constitutionality.
The contention lacks merit.
Section 10, Article X of the Constitution states:
"SEC. 10. No province , city, municipality, or barangay may be created ,
divided, merged, abolished, or its boundary substantially altered, except in
accordance with the criteria established in the local government code
and subject to approval by a majority of the votes cast in a plebiscite in the
political units directly affected." 1 4
As the law-making branch of the government, indeed, it was the Legislature that
imposed the criteria for the creation of a province as contained in Section 461 of the
Local Government Code. No law has yet been passed amending Section 461 of the
Local Government Code, so only the criteria stated therein are the bases for the
creation of a province. The Constitution clearly mandates that the criteria in the Local
Government Code must be followed in the creation of a province; hence, any derogation
of or deviation from the criteria prescribed in the Local Government Code violates
Section 10, Article X of the Constitution.
Contrary to the contention of the movants, the evidence on record proved that
R.A. No. 9355 failed to comply with either the population or territorial requirement
prescribed in Section 461 of the Local Government Code for the creation of the
Province of Dinagat Islands; hence, the Court declared R.A. No. 9355 unconstitutional.
CD Technologies Asia, Inc. © 2018 cdasiaonline.com
In Fariñas v. The Executive Secretary, 1 5 the Court held:
Every statute is presumed valid. The presumption is that the legislature
intended to enact a valid, sensible and just law and one which operates no further
than may be necessary to effectuate the specific purpose of the law.
It is equally well-established, however, that the courts, as guardians of the
Constitution, have the inherent authority to determine whether a statute enacted
by the legislature transcends the limit imposed by the fundamental law. And
where the acts of the other branches of government run afoul of the Constitution,
it is the judiciary's solemn and sacred duty to nullify the same.
. . . [T]he fact that such plebiscite had been held and a new province
proclaimed and its o cials appointed, the case before Us cannot truly be viewed
as already moot and academic. Continuation of the existence of this newly
proclaimed province, which petitioners strongly profess to have been illegally
born, deserves to be inquired into by this Tribunal so that, if indeed, illegality
attaches to its creation, the commission of that error should not provide the very
excuse for perpetuation of such wrong. For this court to yield to the respondents'
urging that, as there has been fait accompli then this Court should passively
accept and accede to the prevailing situation, is an unacceptable suggestion.
Dismissal of the instant petition, as respondents so propose, is a proposition
fraught with mischief. Respondents' submission will create a dangerous
precedent. Should this Court decline now to perform its duty of interpreting and
CD Technologies Asia, Inc. © 2018 cdasiaonline.com
indicating what the law is and should be, this might tempt again those who strut
about in the corridors of power to recklessly and with ulterior motives, create,
merge, divide and/or alter the boundaries of political subdivisions, either brazenly
or stealthily, con dent that this Court will abstain from entertaining future
challenges to their acts if they manage to bring about a fait accompli.
Separate Opinions
PEREZ , J., dissenting :
(b) The territory need not be contiguous if it comprises two (2) or more
islands or is separated by a chartered city or cities which do not contribute to the
income of the province.
(c) The average annual income shall include the income accruing to the
general fund, exclusive of special funds, trust funds, transfers, and non-recurring
income.
Considered the most important factor insofar as the creation of a new province
is concerned, the income requirement under the Local Government Code has been
more than four-fold complied with, as may be gleaned from the Bureau of Local
Government Finance Certi cation that, based on the 1991 constant prices, the average
annual income of the Province of Dinagat Islands is P82,696,433.23. Despite its
aggregate land area of 802.12 square kilometers only, the new province has also
measured up to the territorial requirement since, being comprised of two or more
islands, it is exempted from the contiguous 2,000 square-kilometer land mass
prescribed under Section 461 (a) [i]. Although the exemption in paragraph (b) appears
to extend only to the requirement of contiguity, I am convinced by Mr. Justice Antonio
Eduardo B. Nachura's opinion that, from the tenor of the same provision, the contiguity
and land area requirements cannot be considered separate and distinct from each
other. As eloquently stated in his dissent: cSEDTC
By rough analogy, the two components are like dicephalic conjoined twins
— two heads are attached to a single body. If one head is separated from the
other, then the twins die. In the same manner, the law, by providing in paragraph
(b) of Section 461 that the territory need not be contiguous if the same is
comprised of islands, must be interpreted as intended to exempt such territory
from the land area component of 2,000 sq. km. Because the two component
requirements are inseparable, the elimination of contiguity from the territorial
criterion has the effect of a co-existent eradication of the land area component.
The territory of the province of Dinagat Islands, therefore, comprising the major
islands of Dinagat and Hibuson, and approximately 47 islets, need not be
contiguous and need not have an area of at least 2,000 sq. km. following Section
461 of the LGC.
It will result in super uity, if not absurdity, if paragraph (b) of the provision
is interpreted as referring only to the component requirement of contiguity and not
to both component requirements of contiguity and land area. This is because
contiguity does not always mean contact by land. Thus, insofar as islands are
concerned, they are deemed contiguous although separated by wide spans of
navigable deep waters, with the exception of the high seas, because all lands
separated by water touch one another, in a sense, beneath the water. The
provision, then, as worded, only means that the exemption in paragraph (b) refers
to both the components of territory, that is, contiguity and land area, and not
merely the rst, standing alone. For, indeed, why will the law still exempt the
islands from the requirement of contiguity when they are already legally
contiguous?
CD Technologies Asia, Inc. © 2018 cdasiaonline.com
Compliance with the land area requirement by the Province of Dinagat Islands is
cast in even relief when gauged from the clear and unambiguous language of the IRR
which was formulated in accordance with Section 533 of the Local Government Code,
by the Oversight Committee chaired by the Executive Secretary and composed of
representatives from the Senate, 3 the House of Representatives, 4 the Cabinet 5 and
the leagues of local government units. 6 Partaking the nature of executive construction
and, for said reason, deserving of great weight and respect, 7 Article 9 of the IRR
distinctly provides as follows:
ART. 9. Provinces. –— (a) Requisites for creation. — A province shall not be
created unless the following requisites on income and either population or land
area are present:
(1) Income — An average annual income of not less than Twenty Million
Pesos (P20,000,000.00) for the immediately preceding two (2)
consecutive years based on 1991 constant prices, as certi ed by
DOF. The average annual income shall include the income accruing
to the general fund, exclusive of special funds, special accounts,
transfers, and nonrecurring income; and
(2) Population or land area — Population which shall not be less than two
hundred fty thousand (250,000) inhabitants, as certi ed by NSO;
or land area which must be contiguous with an area of at least two
thousand (2,000) square kilometers, as certi ed by LMB. The
territory need not be contiguous if it comprises two (2) or more
islands or is separated by a chartered city or cities which do not
contribute to the income of the province. The land area requirement
shall not apply where the proposed province is composed of one (1)
or more islands. The territorial jurisdiction of a province sought to
be created shall be properly identified by metes and bounds.
The creation of a new province shall not reduce the land area, population,
and income of the original LGU or LGUs at the time of said creation to less than
the prescribed minimum requirements. All expenses incidental to the creation
shall be borne by the petitioners.
When viewed in the light of the legislative intent underlying Section 461 of the
Local Government Code, I respectfully submit that Article 9 of the IRR is not in con ict
with the criteria for the creation of provinces ensconced in said provision of the basic
law. Unlike Section 197 9 of Batas Pambansa Blg. 337, its counterpart provision in the
predecessor of the present Local Government Code, Section 461 does not give equal
premium to the income, land area and population requirements for the creation of new
provinces. This is readily evident from the fact that, after prescribing the
P20,000,000.00 income requirement, Section 461 simply mandates compliance with
either the requirement of a contiguous territory of 2,000 square kilometers o r a
population of not less than 250,000. Already quoted in Justice Nachura's dissent to the
ponencia, the following transcript of the congressional deliberations on the house bill
from which the present Local Government Code originated is particularly enlightening
regarding the legislative intent for said new requirements, viz.:
HON. ALFELOR:
HON. LAGUADA:
The reason why we are willing to increase the income, double than the
House version, because we also believe that economic viability is really a
CD Technologies Asia, Inc. © 2018 cdasiaonline.com
minimum. Land area and population are functions really of the viability of
the area, because where you have an income level which would be the
trigger point for economic development, population will naturally increase
because there will be an immigration. However, if you disallow the
particular area from being converted into a province because of population
problems in the beginning, it will never be able to reach the point where it
could become a province simply because it will never have the economic
take off for it to trigger off that economic development.
Now, we are saying that maybe Fourteen Million Pesos is a oor area
where it could pay for overhead, and provide a minimum of basic services
to the population. Over and above that, the provincial o cials should be
able to trigger off economic development which will attract new
investments from the private sector. This is now the concern of their local
o cials. But if we are going to tie the hands of the proponents, simply by
telling them, 'Sorry, you are now at 150 thousand or 200,000 thousand,'
you will never be able to become a province because nobody wants to go
to that place. Why? Because you never have any reason for economic
viability.
xxx xxx xxx
CHAIRMAN PIMENTEL:
Okay, what about land area?
HON. LUMAUIG:
Walang problema yon, that's not very critical, 'yong land area because . . .
CHAIRMAN PIMENTEL:
Okay, ya, our, the Senate version is 3.5, 3,500 square meters, ah, square
kilometers.
HON. LAGUADA:
CHAIRMAN PIMENTEL:
Right.
HON. LAGUADA:
Actually, when you come down to it, when government was instituted, there
is only one central government and then everybody falls under that. But it
was later on subdivided into provinces for purposes of administrative
efficiency.
CHAIRMAN PIMENTEL:
Okay.
Yeah, that's correct, but on the assumption that the province is able to do it
without being a burden to the national government. That's the assumption.
HON. LAGUADA:
That's why we're going into the minimum income level. As we said, if we
go on a minimum income level, then we say, "this is the trigger point at
which this administration can take place." HcTIDC
Footnotes
1. SEC. 7. Creation and conversion. — As a general rule, the creation of a local government unit
or its conversion from one level to another shall be based on veri able indicators of
viability and projected capacity to provide services, to wit:
(a) Income. — It must be su cient, based on acceptable standards, to provide for all
essential government facilities and services and special functions commensurate with
the size of its population, as expected of the local government unit concerned;
(b) Population. — It shall be determined as the total number of inhabitants within the
territorial jurisdiction of the local government unit concerned; and
(c) Land area. — It must be contiguous, unless it comprises two (2) or more islands, or is
separated by a local government unit independent of the others; properly identi ed by
metes and bounds with technical descriptions and su cient to provide for such basic
services and facilities to meet the requirements of its populace.
(ii) a population of not less than two hundred fty thousand (250,000)
inhabitants as certified by the National Statistics Office:
Provided, That, the creation thereof shall not reduce the land area, population,
and income of the original unit or units at the time of said creation to less
than the minimum requirements prescribed herein. (Emphasis supplied.)
2. Id.
3. Annex "AA," rollo, p. 498. (Emphasis supplied.)
4. For comparison, Sec. 461 of the Local Government Code of 1991 and Art. 9 of the Rules and
Regulations Implementing the Local Government Code of 1991 are reproduced:
The Local Government Code
SEC. 461. Requisites for Creation. — (a) A province may be created if it has an average
annual income, as certi ed by the Department of Finance, of not less than Twenty
million pesos (P20,000,000.00) based on 1991 constant prices a n d either of the
following requisites :
(1) Income — An average annual income of not less than Twenty Million Pesos
(P20,000,000.00) for the immediately preceding two (2) consecutive years based on
1991 constant prices, as certi ed by the DOF. The average annual income shall include
the income accruing to the general fund, exclusive of special funds, special accounts,
transfers, and non-recurring income; and
(2) Population or land area — Population which shall not be less than two hundred fty
thousand (250,000) inhabitants, as certi ed by the National Statistics O ce; or land
area which must be contiguous with an area of at least two thousand (2,000)
square kilometers, as certi ed by the LMB. The territory need not be
contiguous if it comprises two (2) or more islands, or is separated by a
chartered city or cities which do not contribute to the income of the province.
The land area requirement shall not apply where the proposed province is
composed of one (1) or more islands. The territorial jurisdiction of a province
sought to be created shall be properly identi ed by metes and bounds. (Emphasis
supplied.)
5. Hijo Plantation, Inc. v. Central Bank, G.R. No. L-34526, August 9, 1988, 164 SCRA 192, 199.
6. Emphasis supplied.
7. Emphasis supplied.
8. Emphasis supplied.
9. Emphasis supplied.
10. University of the Philippines Board of Regents v. Auditor General, G.R. No. L-19617, October
31, 1969, 30 SCRA 5, 17.
11. Ramos v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. L-53766, October 30, 1981, 108 SCRA 728.
12. Republic v. Go. Ban Lee, 111 Phil. 805 (1961).
13. Cebu Portland Cement Company v. Municipality of Naga, Cebu, G.R. Nos. 24116-17, August
22, 1968, 24 SCRA 708, 712; Ruben E. Agpalo, Statutory Construction (1986), p. 47.
14. Emphasis supplied.
16. G.R. Nos. 176951, 177499 & 178056, December 21, 2009.
CD Technologies Asia, Inc. © 2018 cdasiaonline.com
17. Fariñas v. The Executive Secretary, supra note 15.
4. The Congressmen appointed by the Speaker, to include the Chairman of the Committee on
Local Government.
5. Secretary of Interior and Local Government, Secretary of Finance, Secretary of Budget and
Management.
6. One representative each from the League of Provinces, League of Cities, League of
Municipalities and Liga ng mga Barangay.
The average estimated annual income shall include the income allotted for both the
general and infrastructure funds, exclusive of trust funds, transfers and nonrecurring
income.
10. Peñera v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 181613, November 25, 2009.
11. Mariano v. COMELEC, G.R. Nos. 118577 and 118627, March 7, 1995.
12. Supra.