Navarro V Executive Secretary Digest

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Law Creating Dinagat Province Valid?

(2011 update)
The National Statistics Office certified that Dinagat Islands’ population is 120,813. Its land area is 802.12
square kilometers and its average annual income is P82,696,433.23, as certified by the Bureau of Local
Government Finance. On October 2, 2006, the President approved into law R.A. 9355 creating the Province of
Dinagat Islands. On December 3, 2006, the COMELEC conducted the mandatory plebiscite for the ratification
of the creation of the province under the LGC which yielded 69,943 affirmative votes and 63,502 negative
votes. With the approval of the people from both the mother province of Surigao del Norte and the Province
of Dinagat Islands (Dinagat), the President appointed the interim set of provincial officials who took their oath
of office on January 26, 2007. Later, during the May 14, 2007 synchronized elections, the Dinagatnons
elected their new set of provincial officials who assumed office on July 1, 2007.

Meanwhile, on November 10, 2006, petitioners Rodolfo G. Navarro and other former political leaders of Surigao
del Norte, filed before the SC a petition for certiorari and prohibition (G.R. No. 175158) challenging the constitutionality
of R.A. No. 9355 alleging that that the creation of Dinagat as a new province, if uncorrected, would perpetuate an illegal
act of Congress, and would unjustly deprive the people of Surigao del Norte of a large chunk of the provincial territory,
Internal Revenue Allocation (IRA), and rich resources from the area. Is R.A. No. 9355 constitutional?

Suggested Answer:

February 10, 2010 Ruling

No. The SC ruled that the population of 120,813 is below the Local Government Code (LGC) minimum
population requirement of 250,000 inhabitants. Neither did Dinagat Islands, with an approximate land area of
802.12 square kilometers meet the LGC minimum land area requirement of 2,000 square kilometers.  The Court
reiterated its ruling that paragraph 2 of Article 9 of the  Rules and Regulations Implementing the Local
Government Code, which exempts proposed provinces composed of one or more islands from the land area
requirement, was null and void as the said exemption is not found in Sec. 461 of the LGC. “There is no dispute that
in case of discrepancy between the basic law and the rules and regulations implementing the said law, the basic
law prevails, because the rules and regulations cannot go beyond the terms and provisions of the basic law,” held
the Court. (GR No. 180050, Navarro v. Ermita, May 12, 2010)

The Republic, represented by the Office of the Solicitor General, and Dinagat filed their respective
motions for reconsideration of the Decision. In its Resolution dated May 12, 2010, the Supreme Court denied
the said motions.

April 12, 2011 Ruling

Yes. In Navarro vs. Executive Secretary (G.R. no. 180050, April 12, 2011), the Honorable Supreme Court ruled that Republic
Act No. 9355 is as VALID and CONSTITUTIONAL, and the proclamation of the Province of Dinagat Islands and the election of
the officials thereof are declared VALID.

The SC also ruled that the provision in Article 9(2) of the Rules and Regulations Implementing the Local Government Code of
1991 stating, “The land area requirement shall not apply where the proposed province is composed of one (1) or more islands,” is
declared VALID.

According to the SC, “with respect to the creation of barangays, land area is not a requisite indicator of
viability. However, with respect to the creation of municipalities, component cities, and provinces, the three (3) indicators of
viability and projected capacity to provide services, i.e., income, population, and land area, are provided for.”

“But it must be pointed out that when the local government unit to be created consists of one (1) or more islands, it is exempt
from the land area requirement as expressly provided in Section 442 and Section 450 of the LGC if the local government unit to
be created is a municipality or a component city, respectively. This exemption is absent in the enumeration of the requisites for
the creation of a province under Section 461 of the LGC, although it is expressly stated under Article 9(2) of the LGC-IRR.”

xxx “There appears neither rhyme nor reason why this exemption should apply to cities and municipalities, but not to
provinces. In fact, considering the physical configuration of the Philippine archipelago, there is a greater likelihood that islands or
group of islands would form part of the land area of a newly-created province than in most cities or municipalities.  It is,
therefore, logical to infer that the genuine legislative policy decision was expressed in Section 442 (for municipalities) and
Section 450 (for component cities) of the LGC, but fellester.blogspot.com was inadvertently omitted in Section 461 (for
provinces). Thus, when the exemption was expressly provided in Article 9(2) of the LGC-IRR, the inclusion was intended to
correct the congressional oversight in Section 461 of the LGC – and to reflect the true legislative intent. It would, then, be in
order for the Court to uphold the validity of Article 9(2) of the LGC-IRR.”

xxx“Consistent with the declared policy to provide local government units genuine and meaningful local autonomy,
contiguity and minimum land area requirements for prospective local government units should be liberally construed in order to
achieve the desired results. The strict interpretation adopted by the February 10, 2010 Decision could prove to be counter-
productive, if not outright absurd, awkward, and impractical. Picture an intended province that consists of several municipalities
and component cities which, in themselves, also consist of islands. The component cities and municipalities which consist of
islands are exempt from the minimum land area requirement, pursuant to Sections 450 and 442, respectively, of the LGC. Yet,
the province would be made to comply with the minimum land area criterion of 2,000 square kilometers, even if it consists of
several islands. fellester.blogspot.com This would mean that Congress has opted to assign a distinctive preference to create a
province with contiguous land area over one composed of islands — and negate the greater imperative of development of self-
reliant communities, rural progress, and the delivery of basic services to the constituency. This preferential option would prove
more difficult and burdensome if the 2,000-square-kilometer territory of a province is scattered because the islands are separated
by bodies of water, as compared to one with a contiguous land mass.”

xxx “What is more, the land area, while considered as an indicator of viability of a local government unit, is not conclusive in
showing that Dinagat cannot become a province, taking into account its average annual income of P82,696,433.23 at the time
fellester.blogspot.com of its creation, as certified by the Bureau of Local Government Finance, which is four times more than the
minimum requirement of P20,000,000.00 for the creation of a province. The delivery of basic services to its constituents has been
proven possible and sustainable. Rather than looking at the results of the plebiscite and the May 10, 2010 elections as mere  fait
accompli circumstances which cannot operate in favor of Dinagat’s existence as a province, they must be seen from the
perspective that Dinagat is ready and capable of becoming a province.” (Navarro vs. Executive Secretary (G.R. no. 180050,
April 12, 2011)

You might also like