R.T. Cooper PDF
R.T. Cooper PDF
R.T. Cooper PDF
his Work
by Ian Watson
An introduction to the work of Dr. Robert Thomas Cooper (1844-1903), with
particular reference to the treatment of deafness and diseases of the ear.
The Cooper Club
In the preface to his Dictionary of Practical Materia Medica the author, John Henry
Clarke, M.D., gives due acknowledgement to some of the authorities he consulted in
the compilation of his work - Allen, Hering, Lippe & Guernsey being among them. He
goes on to mention sources inaccessible to the general reader, being scattered up
and down the periodical literature of Homoeopathy, and throughout the writings of
original workers, among whom I may name Dr. James Compton Burnett and Dr.
Robert T. Cooper as pre-eminent, each in a line of his own.
Burnett needs little introduction today - his quaint little booklets having introduced
many new remedies (and new uses for old remedies) into every day use - Bacillinum
, Urtica urens , Chelidonium majus , Ceanothus , to name but a few. Cooper on the
other hand, for the most part remains buried in numerous journal articles, a few
published booklets long since out of print, and scattered throughout the text of
Clarke's Dictionary. A cursory browse through the latter will reveal the initials R.T.C.
countless times, and a fair number of remedies are listed as having been introduced
into homopathy by the same Dr. Cooper, among them being Agraphis nutans ,
Arbutus andrachne and Lemna minor. Polycrests none of them, but clinically useful
remedies none the less.
Clarke certainly had great respect for Cooper, such that when he formed a materia
medica study group in 1905 - two years after Cooper's death - he named it The
Cooper Club. At the opening meeting Clarke recalled how Cooper, Burnett and
himself had dined together regularly once a month between 1893 to 1901 to share
their experiences, and how he (Clarke) would record the proceedings on a menu card
to be written up later that night. The result, to a large extent, was Clarke's
Dictionary of Materia Medica . Be it understood, said Clarke, it was Robert Thomas
Cooper who began the movement, and who was the life and soul of the movement all
the time. That is why this association, so long as I have anything to do with it, must
bear Cooper's name.
Coopers work
In his day, Cooper found himself unpopular among many of his professional brethren,
and took great pains in his articles, letters and speeches to defend his methods and
to emphasise the results of his treatment. To his credit he was as willing to publish
his failures as he was his successes. That some were jealous of his success seems
probable, especially outside the homopathic fraternity, but many of his fellow
homopaths took issue with him also, mostly over his use of unproven remedies and
arborivital tinctures. Be that as it may, he was certainly an observer of the highest
1
is probably too hot! Having thus found the optimum temperature, he would proceed
to pour the remainder gently into the meatus. He writes of this formula: Over and
over again patients have testified to immediate and positive relief given by these
drops......... I do not remember to have once found it fail to give relief.
Viola odorata
Cooper considered this remedy to act specifically upon the middle ear, retina, lateral
sinus and the inferior cerebellar veins. He found it especially suitable for darkhaired, anaemic or neuralgic (or both) patients, and credited it with the peculiar
property of restoring an otorrha which has been suppressed by cold, fever, or
other morbid condition.
Case: Deafness of both ears, left the worst, of six years' duration, dating from
influenza, in a pale, young woman of twenty. Roaring in both ears, frequent
headache through temples and behind the eyes, anaemic, tympanic membranes.
Watch-hearing right 1in, left on contact. After seven doses of Viol-o. A, given
between May 21st and December 3rd, 1892, the conversation-hearing became good
and the watch-hearing improved to right 9in, left 4in.
Conclusion
By its very nature, chronic deafness presents a difficult challenge to any therapy, the
absence of adequate prescribing symptoms and modalities being a prominent feature
of many cases. Cooper was none the less adamant that they are as curable by
homoeopathy as anything else, and it was only after having tried and failed many
times with the polychrests that he turned to lesser-known and in some cases obscure
remedies, some of which are outlined above. Quite from where he obtained his
original prescribing indications is often unclear, but the results speak for themselves
and the indications he has left us appear to be well-verified and reliable. Cooper
himself was happy to claim the highest authority in support of his methods..............
I believe that in giving single doses of our common plants, often with no proving
whatever to guide me, I am in the main acting in accordance with Hahnemann
himself in the early days of investigation.
References
Dictionary of Practical Materia Medica
J.H. Clarke
Calendula Officinalis: Its action, especially in cases of obstinate deafness - R.T.C.
H.W. Dec 1 1890 pp 535-538
H.W. Feb 2 1891 pp 63-67
H.W. March 2 1891 pp 105-108
H.W. June 1 1891 pp 258-265
Materia Medica - Calendula - R.T.C.
H.W. March 1 1892 pp 109-114; April 1 1892 pp 162-168
Deaf-mutism and the earaches of childhood - R.T.C.
H.W. March 1 1895 pp 107-117
Original Communications - What can be done for the treatment of chronic deafness? R.T.C.
4