Pavel Bannikov’s Post

View profile for Pavel Bannikov, graphic

Fact-checker, OSINTer

Shitification of Google Henk van Ess recently used this term, which is the perfect definition of what happens with Google search. I'll cry a duet with Henk. In just the last 5 years Google has killed almost everything useful that was available to the user. In case you haven't noticed, for example, on 1 February links to cached pages disappeared from searches, and on 24 September Google Cache was finally killed. Reverse image search, gosh, how great it was! In its place is now Google Lens, a cheesy software that can identify a watch brand but is completely useless for verifying the validity of a photo. A crutch in the form of the half-closed Image Context Search — while useful, it's a poor substitute. 300 results in the search. Not more, or even less, even for those queries for which there are thousands and tens of thousands of pages on the Internet. I'm not talking about the geo-algorithm, which will give you three different results for the same query made from Kazakhstan, Montenegro or Germany. And you are lucky if the results will not contradict each other. And this is not only about Google, but more or less about all major search engines and in general products of techno-giants. Looks like everyone has adopted Zuckerberg's main principle, which he has been following since 2018 at least: ‘How else can we make your life harder?’. On the one hand, as a trainer, I can't complain, my Advanced Search course has become twice as popular (and three times as detailed). But on the other hand, I'm a practitioner, and the number of moves I need to make to find what I really need has multiplied. And it's going to get worse. So keep your eyes on the alternatives, and archive anything that might be useful, or you won't find it the day after tomorrow. *The picture shows the Shitification of Google according to the chatGPT.

  • No alternative text description for this image

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics