Achieving and Improving Level & Attenuation Uncertainties in RF Calibration
Achieving and Improving Level & Attenuation Uncertainties in RF Calibration
Achieving and Improving Level & Attenuation Uncertainties in RF Calibration
Paul C. A. Roberts
Fluke Calibration
are needed?
Presentation outline:
• Introduction – traditional methods
• Purpose-designed RF Reference source design architecture
• RF Reference Source calibration & traceabilityy
• Application example
– Attenuator calibration 2
Traditional precision level methods
Output to UUT
Signal Generator
Use p
power meter & splitter
p to improve
p level accuracy...
y
3
Traditional precision level methods
Power Sensor
Remember to consider cable loss and
Power Meter
6dB splitter loss when considering
signal generator maximum output
level specs and required signal level
at UUT!
Output signals delivered direct to the load or Unit Under Test (UUT)
input minimize performance degradation due to cabling and
i t
interconnections.
ti Si
Signals
l generated
t d in
i the
th mainframe
i f are fed
f d to
t the
th
leveling head containing the level detector and attenuator circuits.
70dB of attenuation
10MHz in 10dB steps
OCXO
Frequency
Level O/P Level
Synthesis & Amplifiers Filters Attenuators
Control Atten Sensing
Division
Leveling Head
Floating
PSU
Mainframe (Base Unit) Additional attenuation for
lower level outputs,
Level
Head O/P Attenuators
Sensing Signal & levelling
Leveling Head connections to
mainframe
Level control with splitter/sensor equivalent to “perfect” 50Ω resistor in series with zero impedance source
Specified level
Additional 60dB
delivered direct to
attenuation & similar
UUT from low
splitter/sensor in
VSWR output:
mainframe for lower
-130 to +24 dBm,
level outputs
1mHz to 4GHz,
1 1:1 to 500MHz
1.1:1 500MHz,
1.4:1 at 4GHz Levelling head with internal power splitter/diode sensor
and step attenuators (70dB)
6
RF Reference – architecture features
Space grade hermetically sealed relays
Leading RF switch repeatability, validated at every Calibration
Annual usage monitored, typically 100k operations.
0–70dB attenuator in the Head Rated 107 operations
p (preventative replacement
(p p at 5 million)).
Small signal only in N-Connector
Excellent interference and CM noise rejection
Output match defined close to load Power splitter and diode sensor in the Head
Output match defined close to load
Can typically neglect match errors out to 300MHz
Cable, flexing and connector to Head are sensed out
8
Detailed Level Accuracies
10V p p-p
p
3.5V rms
250mW ±0.7% (W) ±1.2% (W)
II ±0.35% (V) ±0.6% (V)
II
II
II
II
200nV p-p
70nV rms
0.1fW rms
50Ω
20dB 10dB 20dB 20dB
+24dBm
Thermal power
+13dBm
sensor for levels
down to -7dBm.
-85dBm
Step 1:
With UUT attenuator in circuit,,
set 9640A output to +16 dBm,
Power Meter note power meter reading
9640A (approx +6dBm for 10dB UUT)
F/F UUT
Power Sensor
Adapter Attenuator
Step 2:
With UUT attenuator
removed, reduce 9640A
Power Meter output* to reproduce the same
9640A power meter reading.
• Very quick & convenient for fixed and step attenuator calibration
18
Achievable uncertainty example
Using an example DUT of 10dB at a match of 1.05 : 1, at 99% confidence we have:
(converting to and combining as power uncertainty and converting back to dB)
19
Optimising match
Adding a ‘masking pad’ (attenuator) can improve source match contribution
….Pad inserted at point of most benefit i.e. worst/most variable match
Step 1:
With UUT attenuator in
circuit, set 9640A output
to +16 dBm, note power
Power Meter meter reading (approx
9640A +6dBm for 10dB UUT))
Step 2:
St 2
With UUT attenuator
Pad ‘masks’ adapter removed, reduce 9640A
and source match output to reproduce the
same power meter
Power Meter
reading.
9640A
Reduction in 9640A
output gives actual
F/F Masking attenuator value.)
Power Sensor
Adapter Pad 20
Uncertainty improvement
DUT of 10dB at a match of 1.05 : 1, with 3dB masking pad Without masking pad:
(also 1.05:1), at 99% CL:
• In this application, a masking pad could improve poor sensor/detector match if placed at the
sensor/detector input.
21
Conclusions
• The design architecture and calibration of a purpose-designed RF
Reference has been explained
– Enabling precision level and attenuation without the need for additional
equipment
– distinguishing it from general purpose signal generators
• The application example described illustrates how the RF Reference
simplifies and streamlines the calibration of attenuators
– Achieved measurement are uncertainties equal to or better than those
obtained with traditional measurements techniques
• Optimizing matching conditions with masking pads can improve
attenuation measurement uncertainties
• Additional techniques and considerations relevant to attenuation
measurements are discussed in more detail in the written paper
– Coping with large value attenuators and detector choice
– Test signal
g spectral
p content
– Danger of using high input power
©2011 Fluke Corporation. 22
References
• Rhode & Schwarz application note “RF Level Test System +20dBm to -130dBm” .
• P. C. A. Roberts “Measuring Output VSWR For An Active Leveled Source”,
Measurement Science Conference, 2008.
• P. C. A. Roberts “The Verification and Calibration of an RF and Microwave
Calibration Source”, NCSL Conference & Symposium, 2006.
• P. C. A. Roberts “The Challenges of Precision Analog Modulation Measurement”,
Measurement Science Conference, 2007.
• P. C. A. Roberts “Implementing and validating state-of-the-art phase noise
measurement.”, NCSL Conference & Symposium, 2010.
• Fluke 9640A/9640A-LPNX RF Reference Source Instruction Manual,, Chapter
p 5
“Calibration”, available from www.flukecal.com.
• Fluke Application Note “Calibrating attenuators using the 9640A RF Reference”,
document 4015975A A-EN-N, available from www.flukecal.com.