Task A04

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8

TUGAS MATA KULIAH BERPIKIR SISTEM

A04 Assignment: CLD Cases for Mid-term Test Score


FISH BANKS MODEL

Below you find a description of a very simple fisheries model, also known as the basic Fish Banks
model. The two main variables in a fisheries model are fish and ships.

Suppose the number of fish only increases through the fish hatch rate and decreases both through the
fish death rate and the total catch per year. Suppose that the fish hatch rate equals the fish times the
hatch fraction.

The fish death rate is equal to the death fraction times the fish. The death fraction is a function of the
carrying capacity and the number of Fish. The total catch per year depends on the number of ships
and the annual catch per ship which is a function of the fish density.

The density is defined as the amounts of fish in the fishing area divided by the area. Suppose that the
number of Ships increases via the ship building rate which is a function of the investment costs per
ship, annual profits and fraction reinvested.

The annual profits are calculated as the revenues minus the costs. Assume that the revenues equal
the total catch per year times the fish price and that the costs equal the unit ship operating costs times
the number of ships.

• Make a CLD of this model. What can be learned from it?

• In case of undesirable conclusions, change the diagrams to turn undesirable into desirable.

Konstanta :

• Carrying Capacity
• Fishing Area
• Investment Costs per Ship
• Fraction Reinvested

Variabel :

• Number of Fish
• Hatch Fraction
• Fish Hatch Rate
• Death Fraction
• Fish Death Rate
• Fish Density
• Annual Catch per Ship
• Total Catch per Year
• Fish Price
• Revenue
• Number of Ships
• Revenue
• Ship Building Rate
• Unit Ship Operating Cost
• Cost
• Annual Profit
HOUSING POLICIES

Real estate demand in densely populated urban areas with sufficient land to extend is often rather
price sensitive:

declining property prices for instance caused by relative oversupply, i.e. real supply exceeding real
estate demand, results in rapid demand rises.

Construction companies often initiate new projects based on the demand for properties.

Increased demand leads to new projects being initiated. Real estate construction projects are often
completed with relatively long delays of about 2-3 years.

Many construction companies tend to operate in these areas. And they are mostly unaware or do
not keep track of construction projects in

• 1. Make a CLD of this description.

• 2. What kind of dynamics would you expect to see in property prices?

• 3. What would be an adequate strategy of a smart construction company?


Konstanta :

• Area Available

Variabel :

• Real Estate Demand


• New Construction Projects
• Real Estate Supply
• Property Price
• Sufficient Land

- 2. Limit to Growth Archetype


Pada loop B1 dan B2 dimana variabel “Sufficient Land” menjadi variabel batasan jika lahan
menjadi semakin sedikit.
Property Price nilainya semakin tinggi jika Sufficient Land semakin sedikit yang dipengaruhi
oleh tingginya Real Estate Supply dan Real Estate Demand dimana awalnya disebabkan oleh
Property Price yang masih rendah karena Sufficient Land-nya masih tersedia banyak sebagai
titik awal.
- 3. Strategi yang bisa dilakukan : Melakukan monitoring pada projek yang sedang dilakukan
sehingga waktu penyelesaian projek sesuai target, Menyadari ketersediaan lahan sebagai
batasan, Mempelajari lokasi area-area baru yang tersedia untuk projek baru yang potensial,
Mendukung peraturan pemerintah terkait pembangunan yang berkelanjutan (sustainable).
A TRADITIONAL BANK RUN

A traditional bank run starts when (correct or incorrect) information about potential problems at a
bank leads to fear of a bank failure. More fear leads to a higher tendency to withdraw personal
savings. An increase of withdrawals leads to a decrease of the perceived solvency of the bank which
leads to more fear of a bank failure. An increase of withdrawals also leads to a decrease of liquid
bank reserves and hence to a lower liquidity of the bank. Banks then need to turn more and more
illiquid assets into liquid assets (money) to have sufficient liquid assets to pay for (future)
withdrawals. Due to the speed required to liquidate illiquid assets, huge losses are often made,
resulting in a reduction of the solvency of the bank. The lower the solvency of the bank, the lower
the perceived solvency of the bank, which leads to more fear of a bank failure. Weak or uncertain
economic conditions result in more fear and lower perceived solvency.

• 1. Make a causal loop diagram of this description. This causal loop diagram should be similar to the
ones described in (Richardson 1991; MacDonald 2002). How many feedback loops are there? What
is their polarity?

• 2. What are the possible systems behaviors suggested by this CLD?

Variabel :

• Fear of Bank Failure


• Tendency to Withdraw Personal Savings
• Liquid Bank Reserves
• The Solvency of The Bank
• The Perceived Solvency of The Bank
• Weak or Uncertain Economic Condition

2. Semakin lemah dan tidak tentunya kondisi ekonomi menyebakan semakin tinggi The Fear of Bank
Failure dan semakin tinggi Tendency to Withdraw Personal Savings. Semakin tingginya Tendency to
Withdraw Personal Savings, menyebabkan semakin rendahnya The Perceived Solvency of The Bank
dan juga mempengaruhi semakin rendahnya Liquid Bank Reserves dan rendahnya The Solvency of
The Bank. Semakin rendahnya The Perceived Solvency of The Bank akan secara berulang menaikkan
The Fear of Bank Failure.

The Shifting to Burden Archetype,

Pada sistem cenderung untuk menyelasaikan gejala-gejalanya saja namun bukan inti masalahnya.
Terutama ketika waktu kebijakan liquidity tetap diimplementasikan. Bank seharusnya berfokus pada
solusi masalah inti yang mampu menciptakan kondisi keuangan yang lebih stabil, seperti melalukan
prediksi (forecasting) dan menyiapkan safety net untuk menanggulangi kerugian.
ENERGY TRANSITIONS

Energy Transitions are dynamically complex: they are governed by many feedback effects and long
delays. Energy transitions are also deeply uncertain: major uncertainties –related to individuals,
particular technologies, the entire system, and hence for policy/decision makers in the energy field–
are omnipresent. Energy technologies face many uncertainties and need to overcome many hurdles,
even before becoming commercially viable and entering the energy technologies battlefield.

• One of these hurdles is the so-called ‘valley of death’. That is, quite often, entrepreneurs and
technology developers bring a new technology to the pre-commercial stage, but due to a lack of
investments, it does not survive the phase between (subsidized) entrepreneurial technology
development and large-scale commercial take-off in which subsidies are (often) forbidden. It is hard
to predict which promising technologies will actually make it, and hence, which might possibly
become the technologies of the future.

• Many self-reinforcing uncertainties influence perceived certainty related to each new technology.
The lower the perceived certainty, the higher the perceived risk and the lower the entrepreneurial
willingness to acquire knowledge/experiment/lobby/. . . in order to bring a technology to the point
where it would be considered a good investment. Resources for actions to reduce uncertainty may
actually help to take this hurdle and may lead to more perceived certainty and raise perceptions
about the potential success of the technology. This in turn reinforces (intrinsic) entrepreneurial
motivation, resulting in more willingness to act. A reduction of the perceived risk and an increase of
the entrepreneurial motivation are the preconditions to further the state of development and
increase the willingness to invest of entrepreneurs and risk-taking energy companies, which in turn
leads to more real investments, contributing to the success of the technology, reinforcing the
willingness to invest, etc.

• 1. Make a CLD of the pre-battlefield struggle. How many loops are there? What is their polarity?
What would be appropriate names?

• 2. What policy recommendations could be derived from this CLD?


Variabel :

• Company’s Will to Invest


• New Technology
• Real Investment
• Resources
• Perceived Certainty
• Perceived Risk
• Entrepreuner’s Will to Acquire Knowledge
• Success Perception
• Entrepreuner’s Motivation
• Entrepreuner’s Will To Act

Ada 5 Loop :

1. R1 (Reinforcing) : Investment in New Product Development Loop


2. R2 (Reinforcing) : Knowledge in New Product Development Loop
3. R3 (Reinforcing) : Investment by Risk Loop
4. R4 (Reinforcing) : Act to New Product Development Loop
5. R5 (Reinforcing) : Investment by Potential Loop

2. Policy Recommendation :

Sistem memiliki potensi untuk mengalami pertumbuhan di masa depan. Oleh karena itu, pihak
pemerintah perlu membuat regulasi untuk mempertahankan ketersediaan sumber daya (resources)
sehingga entrepreuner-entrepreuner mampu bersaing secara sehat dalam memanfaatkan sumber
daya yang sama.

You might also like