ICICIdirect Model Portfolio Product
ICICIdirect Model Portfolio Product
ICICIdirect Model Portfolio Product
Index
Portfolio investing philosophy .......................................... 2 Approach towards portfolio creation................................ 3 Mode of deployment ....................................................... 4 Model portfolio................................................................. 5
Large cap....................................................................................5 Mid cap ......................................................................................5 Diversified ..................................................................................5
Sector outlook ............................................................................6 Portfolio stocks ........................................................................17 Portfolio review and Risk parameters............................. 52 FAQs .............................................................................. 53
Nifty
Sensex (RHS)
FII flow
150000 100000 (| Crore) 50000 0 FII Investment Sensex (RHS) 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 CY00 CY01 CY02 CY03 CY04 CY05 CY06 CY07 CY08 CY09 CY10
-50000 -100000
Index performance
(%) BSE Sensex Nifty CNX Midcap BSE 100 BSE 200 3m -1.9 -2.0 2.0 -1.4 -1.2 6m -12.0 -11.6 -10.4 -11.3 -11.4 12m -2.1 -1.8 -4.3 -3.0 -3.3 24m 12.9 11.7 23.8 13.3 14.4
Test for self appraisal for an individual for equity portfolio creation:
What are the returns expected over a time frame with the degree of risk tolerance? How much of the spare investment corpus should be committed so that the capital is not disturbed to meet other personal commitments? How does it depend on the risk tolerance and level of understanding of equities? How will one decide the mode of investments, whether into direct equity or the mutual fund route? If direct equities, then whether the portfolio should be concentrated or diversified? What should be the optimal allocation strategy between large caps and midcaps; at the same time, one should be cognizant of the fact that risk is attached to them? How should one devise a strategy for portfolio monitoring and effective churning
Hence, keeping the above tenets in mind, ICICIdirect.com is introducing a comprehensive equity indicative model portfolio. The model portfolio contains a well balanced taste of large cap and quality midcap stocks, which, in our view, have the ability to deliver superior returns over a three to five year time frame.
Page 2
Liquidity
Return
Spare corpus for a longer time frame with a resonable appetite for risk If liqudity is required from time to time in order to meet commitments
High
Low
Risk
Keeping in mind the attributes of the above matrix, we at ICICIdirect.com have built a direct equity indicative model portfolio as a guiding tool for investments in direct equities. The indicative model portfolio has been constructed on the premise that the clients understand the risks associated with investments in equity markets and are comfortable remaining invested in sound businesses over a long period of time.
Varied performance of large caps, midcaps, and small caps
1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Oct-03 Oct-04 Oct-05 Oct-06 Oct-07 Oct-08 Oct-09 Oct-10 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-09 Jan-08 Jan-07 Jan-06 Apr-07 Apr-08 Apr-09 Apr-10 Jan-05 Apr-06 Apr-05 Jan-04 Apr-04 Apr-03 Apr-11 Jul-03 Jul-04 Jul-05 Jul-06 Jul-07 Jul-08 Jul-09 Jul-10 Large caps should always form a significant part of the portfolio as they are less voltile and posses high liquidity in times of crisis, which generally midcaps and small caps are devoid of during difficult times The vulenrability in terms of volatility for small caps and midcaps is high can cause severe losses if an investor is not aware of the nitty gritty of the same.These category are mainly for aggressive investors. Midcaps and Smallcaps are highly prpone to roller coatser rides in times of voltility
Sensex
Midcap Index
Smallcap Index
Page 3
Portfolio allocation: Bet on large caps for longevity and midcaps for alpha
A portfolio should always be allocated in an optimal form in terms of choosing the number of stocks from the large cap and the midcap space. The allocation ratio is again a function of the risk tolerance and return expectations of individual investors. If one is willing to take higher degree of risk given he understands the volatility that persists during difficult market conditions, then an overweight stance on midcaps does make sense. On the other hand, beginners or nave investors should go overweight on large caps and be less dependent on midcaps as the former provides better safety of capital with a reasonable rate of return
SIP delivering more return in volatile periods
12 10 (| Lakh) 8 6 4 2 0 3 Year Corpus SIP 5 Year Corpus Lumpsum 4.3 3.9 7.2 10.4
Mode of deployment: Timing is tricky, lump sum or SIP route is individual investor preference
After deciding on the allocation in terms of exposure to large caps or midcaps, the next important attribute is to decide on the mode of deployment. In order to ascertain this, it is very vital that the investor has a knack to foresee whether the markets ahead will be trending or not. Then, the lump sum deployment strategy would yield better results. In case, the investors do not want to take directional bets but are willing to commit their capital in equities for a reasonable period of time, then the SIP route would be the most preferred route We have run an exercise so as to compare the results between lump sum vs. SIP deployment on three years, five years and 10 years. Results based on different time horizons are different. Hence, the mode of deployment depends totally on the risk appetite and understanding of the equity markets At this juncture, we would favour an SIP mode of deployment given the market conditions and volatility attached with it
The indicative model portfolio has been constructed using a balanced approach wherein the major part of the portfolio is concentrated on large cap stocks, managed conservatively and midcap stocks, relatively with higher risks. We advise that these stocks be invested for periods of three to five years. Thus, they will be able to ride through market volatility and in the end generate relatively superior returns adjusted for the risk attached to them.
Page 4
Page 5
Auto
The domestic automotive industry has touched 17.0 million units in CY10 doubling in the last five years .We believe the India auto-story has just started and has all the makings of a China like J-curve growth even if it is a slightly milder one As per industry estimates population in the Seekers, Strivers* class (| 2-10 lakh income) would double in this decade. The rising disposable incomes in the hands of a demographically rich India would lead to a consumption outburst. We believe that among others, the automotive industry would be a key beneficiary of the same as penetration levels still remain relatively low at ~10 in 1000 people. The industry would enter a hyper growth phase as aspiration purchases of PVs would grow exponentially with rising affordability The real per capita incomes have multiplied ~1.8x in the last five years with average GDP growth of ~8.5%. World Bank even on a conservative basis has estimated the per capita income will multiply ~1.3-1.4x in CY15E even on a higher base from CY11 at an average GDP growth rate of ~8% We estimate the automotive industry would grow to ~27-28 million by CY15E (1.6x-1.7x from CY10). On the PV front specifically, we expect demand to jump multi-fold ~2.5x from present levels in CY10. In the CV segment, as per Daimler global estimates, one in every six CVs globally would be for Indian demand created by the mammoth infrastructure gap expected to be completed in the next decade. These pointers are reflective of the huge opportunity pie for of all players The rise in pricing power for OEMs is a significant change from the previous decades, which makes us believe that the industry is going to ride any intermittent challenges with ease and reap multi-fold rewards in coming years as the demand-pull would continue to grow stronger In OEMs, we prefer market leaders in the PV and CV space are as they are expected to be the biggest beneficiaries of the Indiaauto story on a four to five year time horizon. Also, OEMs that have a strong global portfolio provide geographical diversifications and are also our preference. On the ancillary side, we prefer companies that have strong market dominance to tap both the OEM and replacement market sales and enjoy strongest operating leverage
Aviation
Air travel in India is the third largest in Asia with 54 million passenger round trips in FY11 while market penetration in India is 46/1000 people, which is the third lowest thereby leaving huge scope for growth in this region Strong growth in penetration of air travel is expected to be driven by sustained growth of per capita income and a favourable demographic trend Based on our long-term average GDP growth forecast of 8% and average population growth of 1.2%, we expect passenger traffic at the industry level to double from 54 million in FY11 to
Page 6
Page 7
Cement
Over the past five years, from FY06-11, the all-India cement demand has grown at a CAGR of 8.9%, which has been highly correlated with the GDP growth (cement demand in the country has grown at 1.2x the GDP growth in the last decade). Going ahead also, cement demand is expected to grow at a robust CAGR of ~9% in FY11-15E led by infrastructure spending, particularly in urban areas and independent housing The Indian cement industry is the second largest industry after China, with the total effective capacity of about 280 million tonnes (MT). Over FY06-11, ~118 million tonnes per annum (MTPA) of effective capacity has been added in the industry at a CAGR of ~11%. Going forward, ~80 MTPA of cement capacity will get commissioned from FY11-15E As a significant proportion (~55% of the total capacity of ~118 MTPA) was effectively added during the last two years and also demand took a slight breath and grew by ~4% YoY in FY11 due to a slowdown in construction activities and prolonged monsoon, capacity utilisation rate is expected to have bottomed out at ~77% in FY11. However, we expect the utilisation rate to improve, going forward, as the pace of capacity addition is expected to taper off in subsequent years coupled with robust demand expectation at CAGR of ~9% during FY11-15E. This would help in improving utilisation rates, going forward The long-term demand outlook for the industry continues to be bright given the high growth trajectory of the Indian economy. Strong demand from the housing and infrastructure sector, which consumes ~60% and ~30% of total cement produced in India, respectively, will be the main drivers of growth. We believe that demand for cement will be primarily driven by increasing focus on infrastructure investments where the planned spend between FY12-17E is over US$1 trillion. Higher spending on roads is likely to drive demand for cement from this segment, going forward According to Crisil, urban housing stock is expected to add 2 million units per year and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 2.6% during FY11-15. Rural housing stock is expected to add 4.3 million units per year and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 2.3% in FY11-15 Despite the fact that the Indian cement industry added around 118 MTPA capacity in the last five years, the per capita consumption remains poor at 171 kg when compared to the world average and is almost six times lower than that of China. This indicates a tremendous scope for growth in the Indian cement industry in the long-term
Page 8
Page 9
The increase in the middle class population to ~40% by 2025 from only 5% in 2007 and rising urbanisation would be the drivers for exposure of consumers to a portfolio of modern products and brands and shift to branded & packaged products. Also, these would serve as a conduit for information and goods to their families that are still in rural India According to a McKinsey report, rural income growth is expected to be ~3.6% for 2005-25, higher from the 2.8% growth from 1985-2005. We believe this higher growth in recent years is visibly driving the rising rural consumption for consumer goods. The increase in rural demand for quality & branded products and concomitant increase in rural penetration by providing affordability in prices and required product portfolio to meet their needs will continue to drive the earnings from these fast growing and under penetrated markets In the FMCG space, categories such as hair care (| 7000 crore), skin care (| 3200 crore), mens grooming (| 2000 crore), deodorants (| 500 crore) and culinary (| 6600 crore) are expected to increase by more than 1.5x their current (FY09) market size until 2015. The largest category, food & beverages, is expected to grow by ~1.6x (| 11,49,700 crore) by 2014 over 2008 (| 7,29,200) and the per capita food consumption is expected to increase by 1.3x to | 8193 in 2014. As these categories also have a lower penetration level at ~20-30%, we believe the companies present in these segments have a greater opportunity market, going ahead With the consumption story (rising income leading to higher consumption leading to higher economic growth and greater employment opportunities) for the country remaining positive, higher dividend yields from stocks and improving return ratios of the companies justify the premium valuation. However, we believe that companies that enjoy market leadership and pricing power are a safer haven compared to their peers
Page 10
Page 11
Pharma
We expect major pharma players to clock ~15-18% kind of growth in the domestic formulations for at least four or five years down the line, driven by strong growth in chronic therapies Strong growth will also be driven by improvement in penetration of healthcare services from the current level of just 35% and also increase in healthcare coverage from the current level of just 10% of population.
Page 12
Power
In the XIth and XIIth Five Year Plans, we expect capacity addition to be ~ 47,000 MW and ~ 75,000 MW, respectively. So far, equipment worth 70,000 MW is already being ordered by utilities (state & centre & private) In terms of target vs. actual installed capacity percentage, this would imply 60% growth in the XIth Plan and 75% in the XIIth Plan. Historically, it was 47% and 51% in IXth and Xth Five Year Plan. In terms of private vs. PSUs capacity addition, we expect private players to add ~ 50% and 53% of incremental capacity in XIth and XIIth Five Plan, respectively We expect demand for power to grow at 1.1x GDP growth implying 8-9% growth till FY17 (assuming Indias GDP grows at 7-8% till FY17). On account of capacity addition, we expect the base deficit to be sub 5% by FY17E from the current 8.4% The recent coal acquisition by private players can create near term balance sheet pressures. However, in the long run, it will enhance the fuel security of players acquiring such assets Funding will not be a constraint as the government through power sector lending institutions IIFCL, REC and PFC apart from banks will ensure adequate funding (for the debt portion). On the equity front, PE funding gives us confidence that funding at the project level will happen (no constraint for private developers). However, in the interim, consolidation may take place i.e. inefficient players may sell their stake to more established players We believe that merchant power rates will remain under pressure (below | 4/kwhr). However, in the long run, it should align with incremental cost of production of power SEBs increasing their financial losses is a cause for worry. However, gradual actions (tariff hike) are being taken by certain
Page 13
Retail
The Indian retail sector is on the cusp of aggressive growth in terms of space addition and revenue growth over the next four or five years. The Indian retail sector is expected to grow at a CAGR of 11.4% from $353 billion in FY10 to $543 billion in FY14E. The sector is undergoing a transition from unorganised retail to organised retail with organised retail expected to grow at a CAGR of 35.3% over FY10-FY14E to $67 billion while unorganised retail is expected to grow at a CAGR of 9.3% The current Indian demographic profile lends credence to the Indian consumption growth story. Favourable demographics like four fold increase in middle class population to 148 million and a 5% CAGR in household disposable income to | 3,19,518 in 2010-2025E with increased urbanisation and ~28% of the population in median age group is expected to fuel discretionary spending, the share of which is expected to move up from 52% in 2005 to 70% in 2025 To capitalise on the India consumption story, organised retailers space addition has picked up pace with most organised players announcing aggressive expansion plans. With respect to operating margins, the sector is likely to experience more stability and is less likely to be susceptible to sudden downsides due to efficient cost management strategies like revenue sharing with realtors, better inventory management owing to improved backend infrastructure, etc Organised retailers are expected to continue their profit growth momentum over the next three to four years backed by robust revenue growth and relatively more stable operating margins. However, companies with higher leverage are likely to witness some bottomline pressure due to higher interest costs Although in the near term, we may see a marginal slowdown in consumer demand in the current calendar year on the back of increasing interest rates, economic slowdown and rising food inflation, which could cut down discretionary spends, the longer term picture remains positive. The Indian organised retail sector is still at a nascent stage with a 5.7% share of the total Indian retail market compared to developed countries where organised retail penetration is to the extent of 60-80%. Countries like China, South Korea and Vietnam have organised retail share in the range of 18-23%. Driven by consumption growth, organised retail penetration in India is expected to double to 12.4% by 2014E On the government policy front related to organised retail in India, the key thing to watch out will be any news on opening up of the sector to FDI. While this issue has been under discussion for the past one year, it has gained momentum in the
Page 14
Real Estate
The growth in the real GDP, changing income demographics, shortage of housing units and increased corporate spending supports long term outlook for the real estate sector. According to industry estimates, the number of households are expected to grow at a CAGR of 1.9% to 252 million units during CY11-CY15 driven by the population growth rate (1.4% during the same period) and sizeable increase in the working age population (the proportion of 20-59 yrs age group is expected to increase to 53% in CY15 from 50% in CY05). The Urban housing units to grow at a faster CAGR of 2.7% to 79 million units during CY11-CY15 as the Urbanisation is expected to 32.3% in CY21 from 27.8% in CY01. On the commercial real estate side, the anticipated healthy project pipeline in the key property market such as Mumbai (DTZ anticipates new supply of 40 mn sq ft over the next three years v/s annual absorption of 8-9 mn sq ft) & NCR region (DTZ anticipates new supply of ~30 Mn sq ft over the next three years v/s annual absorption of 8-9 mn sq ft) has kept stable pricing scenario. Nonetheless, delay in the project execution would restrict new supply. Furthermore, key development such as listing of REITS in the Indian market would provide capital appreciation opportunities to the developers as the cap rate are relatively higher in India vis a vis other countries. A lot of regulatory reforms are anticipated such as uniform stamp duty on the property, regulatory framework towards REIT listing and initiatives towards Real Estate Regulatory Bills (streamlining of development of clearance processes and protecting the interest of property purchaser), & transition towards IFRS would act as key catalyst for improved transparency & corporate governance. The improved transparency & corporate governance should bring investors confidence back in the sector.
Technology
Indian IT-BPO exports constitute a modest ~6% of the total worldwide spending on software products, IT & BPO services. IT sector revenues have grown from 1.2% as a proportion of national GDP in FY98 to 6.4% in FY11 and its share of total Indian exports (merchandise plus services) increased from <4% in FY98 to 26% in FY11 The industry directly employs nearly 2.5 million people with indirect job creation estimated at 8.3 million In the long run IT budgets could grow 1.5-2% annually leading to a ~12-15% growth for the overall IT industry. This suggests exports of Indian IT industry could reach $165 billion in FY2020 from $59 billion in FY2011
Page 15
Telecom
After flood of negative news and regulatory concerns since mid 2009, the regulatory environment has turned positive in the last 3 months for most of the incumbent players with the ongoing 2G probe. Companies with clean image and good management have seen expansion in multiples, while others have deteriorated further. Department of Telecom (DoT) would take a balanced approach in formulating the new telecom policy, thus benefiting the incumbents in the long run. Traffic on network of incumbent players expected to increase with reducing competitive pressures. TRAI data suggests that more than half the subscribers of new operators are inactive, resulting in reduced dual SIM phenomena and MoU cannibalization. This trend to get further pronounced in years ahead. Higher traffic growth for incumbents to lead revenue growth with stabilizing ARPM. Competitive intensity has started to soften which is reflected in declining rate of decline in KPIs. With imminent consolidation in the industry, we expect pricing to become more rational, thus aiding revenue and profitability growth. With only three to four 3G players in each circle 3G tariffs would not see 2G like price war and would remain profitable. 3G ARPU expected to be about 2-2.5x 2G ARPU. Introduction of under 100 USD 3G phones to lead to 18-20% of subscribers on 3G by 2016. Rising data consumption on 3G would ensure higher ARPU and profitability for telecom operators. Telecom industry adding about 20 million subscribers monthly with more than 55% addition in B and C circles indicating increasing usage in under-penetrated rural India. Rural penetration would fuel the next phase of growth. Industry is already passed peak capex cycle indicating improvement in return ratios going forward.
Page 16
ACC (ACC)
| 938
Key ratios
EPS (|) PE (x) EV/EBITDA (x) P/BV (x) RoNW (%) RoCE (%) CY07 65.3 12.2 8.5 4.2 34.6 36.2 CY08 61.9 14.5 9.5 3.6 24.6 26.6 CY09 83.3 11.3 6.6 3.0 26.2 32.0 CY10 59.6 15.7 9.9 2.7 17.4 16.7
3m -8 -5 -9 -9
12m 9 6 -2 -16
24m 25 39 41 43
Price movement
6500 6000 5500 5000 4500 4000 3500 Jun-09 Jul-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 Jun-11 Nifty ACC (RHS) 1050 700 350 0
Valuation
Being a large player with strong brand equity, better return ratios and strong balance sheet, ACC has always traded at premium valuations to its peers except Ambuja. Also, during the previous cyclical upturn of FY0608, it was trading above $180/tonne, ~80% premium to the replacement cost of $100/tonne that time. Currently, it is trading at $110/tonne at CY12E capacity which is ~15% discount to the current replacement cost of $130/tonne. We believe in the long-term potential of the stock, considering the robust scenario for the Indian cement industry. Exhibit 1: Financial Performance
(| crore) Net sales EBITDA EBITDA Margins (%) Net Profit
Source: Company, ICICIdirect.com Research
Analysts name
Vijay Goel [email protected] Rashesh Shah [email protected] Hitesh Taunk [email protected]
CAGR (%) 3 -7 -8
Page 17
Key ratio
EPS (|) PE (x) EV/EBITDA (x) P/BV (x) RoNW (%) RoCE (%) FY08 42.7 75.3 51.1 30.4 59.4 58.9 FY09 41.5 71.1 42.3 24.5 46.6 43.9 FY10 87.1 33.8 23.1 16.5 70.1 68.9 FY11 87.9 33.5 21.6 12.9 57.6 54.5
Defensive multiplier
Sustainable volume growth In the last 10 years, Asian Paints market capitalisation has increased 14x with average 2.4% dividend yield every year Asian Paints is the largest paint company in India with more than 50% market share in decorative paints In the last 10 years, the company has grown 2.3x to the real GDP of 8.5%. Revenues have grown 5x with ~20% CAGR and bottomline growing @26% CAGR With volume growth at ~15% CAGR in the last 10 years and 4.5% calibrated price hikes, the company has witnessed such high topline growth Asian Paints has witnessed robust international business growth over the last five years by increasing its presence in various markets specifically in the Caribbean and Middle Eastern region The company has continuously improved its margins over the years from 16.2% in FY02 to 18.1% in FY11. It also commands higher margins compared to its peers due to backward integration of its crude-based derivatives like PAN and Penta Going ahead We believe it would continue to grow at 20%+ in the next three to five years as demand for decorative paints, specifically repainting, continues to increase in Tier-II and Tier-III cities Considering the economy continues to grow at 8%, strong repainting demand and the companys leadership position in decorative paints, we believe the company will continue to witness 13-15% volume growth in the next three to five years The company has pricing power. Hence, it can pass on any cost inflations through sustained price hikes in the decorative segment. However, in industries paints, it does not command similar pricing power
3m 19 20 11 119
6m 12 -2 -4 108
12m 28 38 8 56
Price movement
6500 6000 5500 5000 4500 4000 3500 Jun-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Nov-09 Dec-09 Feb-10 Mar-10 May-10 Jun-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 Jun-11 Nifty ASPN (RHS) 3300 2500 1700 900
Valuation
Asian Paints would continue to register robust volume growth and would maintain its leadership position by enjoying the maximum chunk of the increasing pie. With more than 40% consistent dividend payout over the last 10 years, the company has improved its RoEs from ~30% in FY02 to ~43% in FY11 and RoCEs from ~39% in FY02 to ~57% in FY11. Considering strong cash flows, higher returns ratios and lighter balance sheet, Asian Paints would command higher multiples compared to its peers. Exhibit 2: Financial Performance
(| crore) Net sales EBITDA EBITDA Margins (%) Net Profit
Source: Company, ICICIdirect.com Research
Analysts name
Sanjay Manyal [email protected] Parineeta Poddar [email protected]
CAGR (%) 21 26 27
Page 18
Key ratio
EPS (|) PE (x) EV/EBITDA (x) P/BV (x) RoNW (%) RoCE (%) FY08 17.7 22.0 13.3 6.8 30.9 23.7 FY09 22.3 17.4 10.2 4.9 27.9 24.0 FY10 24.0 16.2 9.1 3.6 22.0 19.7 FY11 15.9 24.4 10.0 3.0 12.4 9.3
3m 22 -16 30 15
6m 16 -31 19 -10
Price movement
6500 6000 5500 5000 4500 4000 3500 Jun-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 Jun-11 500 400 300 200 100 0
Nifty
Airtel (RHS)
18 7 8
17 9
(%)
Valuation
Airtel has commanded a premium to its peers on account of industry dominance, clean image and good management, and has appreciated the most in the last 12 months. We believe the premium would further expand with healthy regulatory environment, uptick in 3G services, exponential growth and subsequent turnaround in African operations. We recommend the stock to be accumulated. Exhibit 3: Financial Performance
(| crore) Net sales EBITDA EBITDA Margins (%) Net Profit FY08 27025 11372 42.1 6701 FY09 36962 15168 41.0 8470 FY10 39615 16027 40.5 9102 FY11 59467 19961 33.6 6047 CAGR (%) 30 21 -3
FY08
FY09
FY10
FII
DII
Analysts name
Karan Mittal [email protected]
FY11
Page 19
Key ratio
FY08* FY09* FY10* EPS (|) 6.8 6.4 15.6 PE (x) NA NA NA EV/EBITDA (x) NA NA NA P/BV (x) NA NA NA RoNW (%) 43.7 27.9 50.5 RoCE (%) 24.9 21.4 38.0 valuations not a comparable ground hence NA FY11 17.2 22.9 13.6 7.4 32.6 28.3
Black Gold
Size does matter Coal India (CIL) is the largest coal producing company in the world, based on raw coal production of 431.3 million tons in FY11. As of April 1, 2010 the company has total reserves of ~18.9 billion tonnes comprising ~10.6 billion tonnes of proved reserve and 8.3 MT of probable reserves. CIL also has huge resources of ~64.2 billion tonnes, which constitutes 51.3 billion tonnes, 9.9 billion tonnes and ~3 billion tonnes measured, indicated and inferred resources, respectively As of March 31, 2010, CIL operated 471 mines in 21 major coalfields across eight states in India. Out of the total mines operated, the number of open cast mines, underground mines and mixed mines remained 163, 273 and 35, respectively. Going ahead Over the next few years there is massive capacity addition anticipated in the power sector, majority of which is expected in the Thermal segment. As the power capacities come on stream demand for coal is expected to increase considerably. On the similar lines CIL has plans to ramp up its capacity in order to cater to the incremental demand. CIL is planning to set up 20 coal washeries, with a capacity of 111.1 mtpa (million tonnes per annum) over the next few years. Furthermore CIL is also planning to ramp up production from its existing washeries. As washed coal commands higher realisation, the average realisation of CIL is expected to improve. Going forward on the back of better product mix & higher realisation the margins are expected to expand from current levels. The overall profitability of the company has doubled during the last 3 years from ~|5200 crore to ~|10800 crore registering a CAGR of 27 %(FY08 to FY11).
Price movement
6500 6000 5500 5000 4500 4000 3500 Nov-10 Dec-10 Mar-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jan-11 Feb-11 Apr-11 450 375 300 225 150 75 0
Nifty
Coal (RHS)
Analysts name
Dewang Sanghavi [email protected] Shraddha Shroff [email protected]
Valuation
CIL enjoys monopoly status in the domestic market and contributes ~80% of the countrys total coal output. With the rising demand for coal in India the company is very well placed as the sole supplier of coal to industries like power, steel, cement, etc. Going forward the company is planning to increase its beneficiated coal capacity which would lead to margin expansion. Exhibit 4: Financial Performance
(| crore) Net sales EBITDA EBITDA Margins (%) Net Profit FY08 34608 6258 18% 5243 FY09 40811 2615 6% 2079 FY10 46684 10453 22% 9622 FY11 50234 11551 23% 10867 CAGR (%) 13.2 22.7 27.5
Page 20
Key ratio
EPS (|) PE (x) EV/EBITDA (x) P/BV (x) RoNW (%) RoCE (%) FY08 22.0 12.1 7.7 2.7 21.9 17.2 FY09 22.3 12.7 7.0 2.0 19.5 15.9 FY10 26.1 17.7 9.7 2.9 20.0 16.7 FY11 31.7 14.2 9.6 2.8 20.6 16.3
Steady performer
Strong expansion plans GAIL (India) Limited is India's flagship natural gas company, integrating all aspects of the natural gas value chain. This includes business segments like exploration & production, LPG production, petrochemicals, transmission, distribution and marketing of natural gas GAIL owns ~8,000 km of natural gas pipelines with a capacity to carry 170 mmscmd across the country The company had petrochemicals capacity of 4,50,000 TPA at the end of FY11 and has retail gas presence across 15 cities in India Going ahead GAIL plans to add 6,000 km of pipelines and increase its gas transmission capacity to 300 mmscmd in the next three years. The company also plans to double its petrochemicals capacity to 9,00,000 TPA in the next few years. Going forward, the gas business will contribute towards major part of companys profitability. The petrochemical segment would follow in terms of profitability. GAIL has formed a wholly subsidiary, GAIL Gas Ltd, to aggressively expand its operations in City Gas Distribution projects. It plans to cover ~ 50 cities by FY14. GAIL also plans to diversify its revenue stream by adding ~550 MW of power plants by the end of FY14.
3m -6 22 19 -4
6m -21 8 9 -15
12m -2 37 79 -9
Price movement
6500 6000 5500 5000 4500 4000 3500 Jun-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 Jun-11 Nifty GAIL (RHS) 600 525 450 375 300 225 150
Valuation
Strong financials, a dominant position in transmission and relatively newer asset base provides good growth prospects for the company. GAIL is also expected to be the key beneficiary of the increase in demand for natural gas in India. With the current capital expenditure plans in place, GAIL offers a lot of safety and visibility of earnings growth to investors over the next few years. Exhibit 5: Financial Performance
(| crore) Net sales EBITDA EBITDA Margins (%) Net Profit FY08 18129 4558 25.1 2783 FY09 24063 4463 18.5 2826 FY10 25678 5479 21.3 3314 FY11 35106 6620 18.9 4021 CAGR (%) 25 13 -9 13
Analysts name
Mayur Matani [email protected] Nishit Zota [email protected]
Page 21
HDFC (HDFC)
|630
Key ratio
Net Profit (|Bn) EPS (Rs) Growth (%) BV (|) P/E (x) Price / Book (x) GNPA (%) NNPA (%) RoNA (%) RoE (%) FY08 2436.3 13.0 7.8 84 48.5 7.5 0.8 0.2 2.7 27.8 FY09 2282.5 16.0 23.1 92 39.4 6.8 0.8 0.1 2.6 18.2 FY10 2826.5 20.0 25.0 106 31.5 5.9 0.8 0.25 2.6 19.6 FY11 3535.0 24.0 20.0 118 26.3 5.3 0.8 0 3.0 22.9
Price movement
800 600 400 200 0 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 Jan-10 Feb-10 Apr-10 May-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Apr-11 May-11 HDFC Nifty (RHS) 3000 1000 7000 5000
(%)
26
27
29
Valuation
HDFC has always traded at rich multiples of over 3.5x one year forward ABV because of its strong management and consistent return ratios with RoA of 2% plus and 18-20% RoE. Going forward, subsidiaries like HDFC Standard Life are expected to get listed leading to value unlocking for investors. We remain bullish on the stock. Exhibit 6: Financial Performance
(| crore) NII Other Income PPP Net Profit
Source: Company, ICICIdirect.com Research
FY08
FY09
FY10
FII
DII
Analysts name
Kajal Gandhi [email protected] Viraj Gandhi [email protected] Mani.Arora [email protected]
FY11
CAGR (%) 19 36 20 13
Page 22
Key ratio
Net Profit (| Cr) EPS (|) Growth (%) ABV (|) P/E (x) Price / Book (x) Price / ABV (x) GNPA (%) NNPA (%) RoNA (%) RoE (%) FY08 1590.2 44.9 25.5 316.0 51.2 7.0 7.3 1.4 0.5 1.4 17.7 FY09 2244.9 52.8 17.6 329.6 43.6 6.5 7.0 2.0 0.6 1.4 17.2 FY10 2948.7 64.4 22.1 461.6 35.7 4.8 5.0 1.4 0.3 1.5 16.3 FY11 3926.4 84.4 31.0 520.0 27.2 4.3 4.4 1.1 0.2 1.5 16.4
Price movement
3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 Jan-10 Feb-10 Apr-10 May-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Apr-11 May-11 HDFC Bank Nifty (RHS) 7000 5000 3000 1000
(%)
12
12
Valuation
FII DII
Analysts name
Kajal Gandhi [email protected] Viraj Gandhi [email protected] Mani.Arora [email protected]
The bank is expected to trade at premium valuations due to its ability to protect NIM, a fine mix of growth and profitability, best in class services offered and proven capabilities of the management. We, therefore, recommend HDFC Bank as one of our top picks in our model portfolio. Exhibit 7: Financial Performance
(| crore) NII Other Income PPP Net Profit
Source: Company, ICICIdirect.com Research CBOP- Centurion Bank of Punjab
FY08
FY09
FY10
FY11
CAGR (%) 26 24 27 35
Page 23
Hindalco (HINDAL)
| 176
Key ratio
EPS (|) PE (x) EV/EBITDA (x) P/BV (x) RoNW (x) RoCE (x) FY08 11.5 15.3 14.7 1.9 12.7 8.7 FY09 2.5 69.2 16.2 2.1 3.1 1.3 FY10 20.5 8.5 14.9 1.6 18.2 14.2 FY11 12.8 13.6 13.6 1.2 8.5 9.1
3m -15 -25 2 4
6m -21 -5 -3 12
12m 23 -16 2 37
24m 84 -2 0 113
Price movement
6500 6000 5500 5000 4500 4000 3500 Jun-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Nov-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 Jun-11 Nifty Hindalco (RHS) 300 250 200 150 100 50 0
(%)
13
Valuation
FII DII
Analysts name
Dewang Sanghavi [email protected] Shraddha Shroff [email protected]
Hindalcos business will grow notably as expanded capacities (overall) come on stream. Improved sales mix with higher focus on sale of value added products will lead to strong revenue growth. Revenue of Novelis is largely driven from its two segments, viz., cans and auto sector. Demand from can is repetitive in nature while the automobile sector is expected to post strong growth. Thus performance of Novelis is expected to be robust on the back of strong demand, technological edge and cost efficiency. Exhibit 8: Financial Performance
(| crore) Net sales EBITDA EBITDA Margins (%) Net Profit FY08 60013 6635 11.1 2193 FY09 65963 2970 17.2 484 FY10 60722 9746 20.7 3925 FY11 72078 8433 20.9 2456 CAGR (%) 6 8 4
FY08
FY09
FY10
FY11
Page 24
Key ratio
EPS (|) PE (x) EV/EBITDA (x) P/BV (x) RoNW (%) RoCE (%) FY08 81.4 33.3 26.4 11.8 33.8 38.7 FY09 104.6 25.9 19.2 8.9 32.8 37.9 FY10 109.5 24.7 17.6 7.0 22.9 30.2 FY11 119.5 22.7 15.4 6.1 21.6 31.0
Negatives priced in
Expectations have likely tempered Infosys is the second largest IT company in India Revenue and net profit have grown at a CAGR of 28.1% & 27.6% during FY04-FY11 period FY12E initial US$ revenue growth guidance of 18-20% was ahead of consensus estimate Clients in core verticals such as banking financial services & insurance (36% of FY11 revenues), retail (14.5%), & manufacturing (20%) continue to spend Application development services grew 18.5% YoY & 4.3% QoQ in Q4FY11 and stood at 16.1% of revenues. Suggests momentum in discretionary spending Utilisation including trainees stands at a modest 68.4%, lower compared to its two year historical average of 70.1% With reorganisation complete we believe focus disruption would likely subside Going ahead Total Indian IT exports could reach $165 billion in FY2020 from $59 billion in FY2011. Infosys should be a key beneficiary of market share gains lead by brand value, scale efficiencies, client base in excess of 500 and client diversification across geographies This should help the company to report robust US$ revenue growth during the same period Pricing improvement led by cost-of-living allowances (COLA) adjustments & portfolio shift could help offset wage inflation Infosys continues to enjoy industry leading operating margins
3m -7 3 -31 2
6m -18 -5 -17 2
12m -3 40 -3 19
Price movement
6500 6000 5500 5000 4500 4000 3500 Jun-09 Jul-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 Jun-11 4000 3375 2750 2125 1500
Nifty
Infosys (RHS)
Valuation
Demand environment continues to be robust led by discretionary spending across verticals and service lines. Recent sharp correction in the stock price was driven by heightened street expectation and provides attractive entry points. Exhibit 9: Financial Performance
(| crore) Net sales EBITDA EBITDA Margins (%) Net Profit FY08 16692 5238 31.3 4659 FY09 21693 7195 33.2 5988 FY10 22742 7852 34.5 6219 FY11 27501 8964 32.6 6823 CAGR (%) 18 20 14
Analysts name
Abhishek Shindadkar [email protected] Aishwariya KPL [email protected]
Page 25
ITC (ITC)
Strong cash flows
| 187
Key ratio
EPS (|) PE (x) EV/EBITDA (x) P/BV (x) RoNW (%) RoCE (%) FY08 4.1 45.1 31.4 11.7 26.0 32.4 FY09 4.3 43.4 28.1 10.3 23.7 31.3 FY10 5.4 34.6 22.5 10.0 28.8 38.7 FY11 6.5 28.8 19.1 8.8 30.5 40.1
3m 16 24 19 12
6m 14 15 9 11
12m 49 28 27 37
Price movement
6500 6000 5500 5000 4500 4000 3500 Jun-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Nov-09 Dec-09 Feb-10 Mar-10 May-10 Jun-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 Jun-11 200 180 160 140 120 100
Nifty
ITC (RHS)
Sustainable revenue growth ITC is the largest cigarette and paperboard manufacturer and second largest hotel company in India with ~70% market share in cigarettes With the FMCG industry likely triple by growing at ~13.0% CAGR by 2020 to | 4.0 lakh crore (source: CII), we believe ITC would continue to grow at ~17% (grown 1.3x of industry in the last 10 years) with moderate volume growth and steady prices hikes We have seen sharp excise duty hikes on cigarettes in the past that has not gone well to increase revenues for the government as price hikes have taken a toll on volumes. Hence, the government has gone soft on hikes. This would result in higher volume growth compared to the last two or three years Cigarettes account for only 15% of the total tobacco consumption in India. With the low per capita consumption of 99 sticks per annum compared to other regional countries like Pakistan (~391), Nepal (~274) and developed countries like US (~1196), Japan (~2028). This presents a big opportunity for Indian companies. As ITC is the largest play would garner the biggest chunk of the pie With 51.1% CAGR revenue growth in non-cigarette FMCG in the last five years, losses have reduced substantially (| 331.5 crore in FY11) after peaking to | 484 crore in FY09 Going ahead With the GDP growing at 8% per annum and per capital income increasing to 1.3-1.4x in FY15 compared to FY11, volume growth in cigarettes would continue to grow at 3-5% while EBIT would grow at ~10-12% in the next five years With rising disposable incomes and increasing penetration for branded food products (ITC largely present), the FMCG business would continue to register double digit growth and start contributing to EBITDA in the next two or three years. This would augur well for the company Considering ITCs lower susceptibility to raw material prices, backward integration through agri-business and pricing power in cigarettes would continue to help it maintain such high margins
Valuation
The stock has got re-rated gradually over the years compared to its closest peer. With strong cash flows from the cigarette business, the company has increased its dividend payout from ~28% in FY02 to ~80% in FY11. With the expected break-even of the FMCG business, we believe the stock would continue to command a premium compared to its peers. Exhibit 10: Financial Performance
(| crore) Net sales EBITDA EBITDA Margins (%) Net Profit FY08 14659 4568 31.2 3158 FY09 16556 5072 30.6 3325 FY10 19136 6324 33.0 4168 FY11 22274 7408 33.3 5018 CAGR (%) 15 17 17
Analysts name
Sanjay Manyal [email protected] Parineeta Poddar [email protected]
Page 26
Key ratio
EPS (|) PE (x) EV/EBITDA (x) P/BV (x) RoNW (x) RoCE (x) FY08 75.6 22.7 39.4 11.2 27.5 24.9 FY09 59.5 28.8 30.3 8.4 24.1 22.0 FY10 73.8 23.2 24.7 5.8 21.2 15.0 FY11 65.3 26.3 18.8 4.9 19.0 14.0
3m 13 1 15 1
6m -14 -17 9 12
12m 0 -20 -1 21
24m 11 -10 77 10
Price movement
6500 6000 5500 5000 4500 4000 3500 Jun-09 Jul-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 Jun-11 Nifty L&T (RHS) 2400 2200 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200
12
14
15
Analysts name
Chirag J Shah [email protected]
Valuation
L&T is the best way to play the infrastructure story in the next five years. It has a diversified business model in terms of different verticals of the sector, good mix of domestic and international business, better execution capability & technology tie ups and healthy balance sheet to capitalise on opportunities that will come across in next five years. Exhibit 11: Financial Performance
(| crore) Net sales EBITDA EBITDA Margins (%) Net Profit FY08 24855 2902 11.7 2173 FY09 33926 3857 11.4 3482 FY10 37035 5890 15.9 4376 FY11 43905 5885 13.4 3958 CAGR (%) 21 27 22
Page 27
Lupin (Lupin)
| 431
Key ratio
EPS (|) PE (x) EV/EBITDA (x) P/BV (x) RoNW (%) RoCE (%) FY08 9.9 43.3 42.7 13.8 31.9 22.2 FY09 12.1 35.6 29.3 12.5 35.6 23.6 FY10 15.3 28.2 20.5 7.5 27.3 22.4 FY11 19.3 22.3 16.7 5.8 26.5 22.7
3m 12 19 14 16
6m -6 17 6 -3
12m 16 47 43 23
Price movement
6500 5500 4500 3500 Jun-09 Jul-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 Jun-11 Nifty Lupin (RHS) 700 500 300 100
(%)
FY08
FY09
FY10
FII
DII
FY11
Analysts name
Siddhant Khandekar [email protected] Krishna Kiran Konduri [email protected]
Valuation
Lupin is growing in all major geographies to reduce its reliance on a particular geography. Taking into account the good show in a tough environment and robust product pipeline along with legacy strongholds such as a strong balance sheet, working capital efficiency and trustworthy management, we remain bullish on the stock. Exhibit 12: Financial Performance
(| crore) Net sales EBITDA EBITDA Margins (%) Net Profit
Source: Company, ICICIdirect.com Research
CAGR (%) 28 39 28
Page 28
Key ratio
EPS (|) PE (x) EV/EBITDA (x) P/BV (x) RoNW (%) RoCE (%) FY08 59.9 19.3 10.8 4.0 22.7 30.5 FY09 42.2 27.4 16.5 12.8 13.7 18.4 FY10 86.4 13.4 8.7 7.6 23.6 31.7 FY11 79.0 14.6 8.5 5.9 17.8 23.9
3m -17 0 0
12m 16 -14 2
24m 172 10 73
Price movement
6500 6000 5500 5000 4500 4000 3500 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600
Jun-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Nov-09 Dec-09 Feb-10 Mar-10 May-10 Jun-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 Jun-11
Nifty Maruti Suzuki (RHS)
Analysts name
Karan Mittal [email protected] Nishant Vass [email protected]
Valuation
We expect MSIL to retain its market leadership position in the PV space. MSIL at present has witnessed multiples contraction due to the overplaying of concerns. We believe these concerns are at best short term, and MSIL is a good pick to accumulate with long term horizon. Exhibit 13: Financial Performance
(| crore) Net sales EBITDA EBITDA Margins (%) Net Profit FY08 18773 2700 14.4 1731 FY09 20358 1952 9.6 1219 FY10 28959 3928 13.6 2498 FY11 36129 3660 10.1 2284 CAGR (%) 24 11 10
Page 29
NTPC (NTPC)
| 175q
Key ratio
EPS (|) PE (x) EV/EBITDA (x) P/BV (x) RoNW (%) RoCE (%) FY08 9.1 19.3 14.6 2.1 13.7 18.5 FY09 12.6 14.0 13.7 2.3 18.5 15.3 FY10 10.6 16.5 13.8 2.3 14.0 12.4 FY11 11.0 15.9 12.1 2.1 13.4 12.6
Return matrix
(%) NTPC Neyveli Lignite Tata Power Reliance Power JSW Energy Lanco Infratech Adani Power
Price as on 20 June 2011
Price movement
6500 6000 5500 5000 4500 4000 3500 240 216 192 168 144 120
Jun-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Nov-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 Jun-11
Nifty NTPC (RHS)
Valuation
We believe the company is a defensive play (with reasonable valuation) in the power sector on account of the regulated nature of the business at the time when the sector is plagued by rising interest rates, declining merchant power rates, backing down by SEBs (on account of losses) and falling gas output from the KG D6 basin. Key risks (for the stock not to outperform) would be a delay in capacity addition, lesser coal availability for newly commissioned capacity and backing down by SEBs (leading to loss of revenues). Exhibit 14: Financial Performance
(| crore) Net sales EBITDA EBITDA Margins (%) Net Profit FY08 38635 11735 30.4 7470 FY09 44245 12639 28.6 10427 FY10 46323 12420 26.8 8728 FY11 54874 14151 25.8 9103 CAGR (%) 12 6 7
Analysts name
Chirag Shah [email protected] Darshan Dodhia [email protected]
Page 30
Key ratio
EPS (|) PE (x) EV/EBITDA (x) P/BV (x) RoNW (%) RoCE (%) FY08 23.5 9.0 5.7 2.7 22.7 22.9 FY09 23.1 12.1 4.5 1.8 13.3 20.3 FY10 22.7 13.2 6.6 2.3 20.0 17.8 FY11 26.3 10.3 4.8 2.0 19.9 24.1
3m -11 0 -5 -16
6m -6 -9 -22 -21
Price movement
6500 6000 5500 5000 4500 4000 3500 450 375 300 225 150
Jun-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 Jun-11
Nifty ONGC (RHS)
Valuation
Any reforms in the pricing of sensitive petroleum products would reduce ONGCs subsidy burden and improve its profitability. We believe low valuations and further reforms in subsidy sharing mechanism would be triggers for the stock, going forward. Also, ONGCs large reserve base and new discoveries would create value for investors. Exhibit 15: Financial Performance
(| crore) Net sales EBITDA EBITDA Margins (%) Net Profit FY08 96782 36586 37.8 20076 FY09 104588 36907 35.3 19795 FY10 101754 35436 34.8 19404 FY11 117610 51811 44.1 22456 CAGR (%) 7 12 5 4
Analysts name
Mayur Matani [email protected] Nishit Zota [email protected]
Page 31
Key ratio
EPS (|) PE (x) EV/EBITDA (x) P/BV (x) RoNW (%) RoCE (%) FY08 67.3 13.4 16.8 3.9 25.5 17.1 FY09 54.1 16.6 12.4 2.1 14.5 9.7 FY10 53.4 16.9 12.0 2.3 18.7 13.2 FY11 64.8 13.9 9.4 2.0 13.1 11.0
3m -11 0 -5 -16
6m -6 -9 -22 -21
Price movement
6500 6000 5500 5000 4500 4000 3500 1200 900 600 300 0
Jun-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 Jun-11
Nifty RIL (RHS)
10
11
Valuation
RIL valuations will be led by its traditional businesses, refining and petrochemicals. Global refining margin will likely be robust (RIL US$11/bl in FY13E) as product demand from Asia surges and European and the US stabilize. New discoveries in the KG basin, development of shale gas blocks and successful diversification in new business could provide upside to the stock, going forward. E&P will also chip in as key concerns have been addressed through the British Petroleum (BP) deal, indicating a strong bottom for its E&P valuations at US$24bn Exhibit 16: Financial Performance
(| crore) Net sales EBITDA EBITDA Margins (%) Net Profit FY08 137147 22270 16.2 19568 FY09 151224 24217 16.0 14971 FY10 203740 30333 14.9 15897 FY11 265811 38072 14.3 19294 CAGR (%) 25 20 -4 0
Analysts name
Mayur Matani [email protected] Nishit Zota [email protected]
Page 32
Key ratio
Net Profit (|Bn) EPS (Rs) Growth (%) ABV (|) P/E (x) Price / Book (x) Price / Adj Book (x GNPA (%) NNPA (%) RoNA (%) RoE (%) FY08 67.3 106.6 23.5 693.3 20.5 3.3 3.1 3.1 1.8 1.0 16.8 FY09 91.2 143.7 34.8 795.8 15.2 2.9 2.7 2.9 1.8 1.1 17.1 FY10 91.7 144.4 0.5 886.3 15.1 2.5 2.5 3.1 1.7 0.9 14.8 FY11 81.1 127.7 -11.5 831.0 17.1 2.2 2.6 3.4 1.6 0.7 12.5
Price movement
4000 3000 2000 1000 0 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 Jan-10 Feb-10 Apr-10 May-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Apr-11 May-11 SBI Nifty (RHS)
Valuation
SBI with its return ratios of 0.8-1% RoA and 14-16% RoE is expected to trade at a premium to other public sector banks due to its scale. All major subsidiaries including SBI Life are profitable. Associate banks expected to be merged over the next 12-24 months, have also generated RoA of 0.81%, which will keep consolidated return ratios healthy. There is a rights issue of | 20,000 crore that is expected in H2FY11, which should further strengthen the bank with much needed capital. With strong economic growth, the financial services sector should outperform and SBI will be a significant contributor in the same. Exhibit 17: Financial Performance
(| crore) NII Other Income PPP Net Profit FY08 17021 8695 13108 6729 FY09 20873 12691 17915 9121 FY10 23671 14968 18321 9166 FY11 32325 15823 25178 8109 CAGR (%) 24 22 24 6
Analysts name
Kajal Gandhi [email protected] Viraj Gandhi [email protected] Mani.Arora [email protected]
Page 33
Key ratio
EPS (|) PE (x) EV/EBITDA (x) P/BV (x) RoNW (%) RoCE (%) FY08 56.2 16.6 20.5 4.1 23.9 21.3 FY09 -49.2 NA 34.8 8.2 5.3 3.0 FY10 45.1 20.7 9.6 6.5 25.0 18.3 FY11 145.3 6.4 5.1 2.9 44.0 32.0
3m -17 0 0
12m 16 -14 2
24m 172 10 73
Price movement
6500 6000 5500 5000 4500 4000 3500 Jun-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Nov-09 Dec-09 Feb-10 Mar-10 May-10 Jun-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 Jun-11 Nifty Tata Motors (RHS) 1400 1100 800 500 200
Analysts name
Karan Mittal [email protected] Nishant Vass [email protected]
Valuation
TML witnessed a turnaround in earnings. However, valuations in terms of multiples still remain docile and have not seen any re-rating till now. We believe this is on the cards as the strong domestic CV, PV segment presence along with a luxury play of JLRs calibre in the price inelastic segment provides a unique geographical, business diversification. Exhibit 18: Financial Performance
(| crore) Net sales EBITDA EBITDA Margins (%) Net Profit FY08 32361 4023 12.4 319 FY09 70881 2995 4.2 -2465 FY10 92519 10407 11.2 2517 FY11 123133 17780 14.4 9221 CAGR (%) 56 64 207
Page 34
Key ratio
EPS (|) PE (x) EV/EBITDA (x) P/BV (x) RoNW (%) RoCE (%) FY08 177.0 0.0 4.9 1.1 35.9 15.6 FY09 67.8 0.0 4.6 1.4 17.4 15.0 FY10 NA NA 11.3 1.8 -7.1 4.2 FY11 99.6 0.0 6.1 1.4 24.0 11.4
3m -6 -14 -6 -5
24m 36 -10 29 48
Price movement
7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 Jun-09 Jul-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 Jun-11 Nifty Tata Steel (RHS)
19
Valuation
FII
DII
Analysts name
Dewang Sanghavi [email protected] Shraddha Shroff [email protected]
Tata Steels Indian operations has a robust business model, higher margin & domestic demand advantage. The upcoming new capacity is expected to add to revenue & profitability along with increasing the contribution from higher margin domestic business. The groups strategy to restructure long products business of European operations & target high value markets is expected to yield benefits in long run. Going forward this would help the company to have flexibility in its operations so as to focus on segments having higher growth rate & keep the costs under check. Exhibit 19: Financial Performance
(| crore) Net sales EBITDA EBITDA Margins (%) Net Profit FY08 131536 18567 14.1 12350 FY09 145686 18128 12.4 4951 FY10 101758 8043 7.9 -2009 FY11 117150 15996 13.7 8983 CAGR (%) -4 -5 -10
(%)
FY08
FY09
FY10
FY11
Page 35
Key ratio
EPS (|) PE (x) EV/EBITDA (x) P/BV (x) RoNW (%) RoCE (%) FY08 26.0 41.2 34.4 11.2 41.7 41.1 FY09 26.4 40.5 28.3 8.5 33.2 39.6 FY10 35.1 30.5 23.4 6.7 37.4 42.2 FY11 44.4 24.1 18.2 5.8 35.7 41.6
3m 3 -7 -31 2
6m -5 -18 -17 2
12m 40 -3 -3 19
Price movement
6500 6000 5500 5000 4500 4000 3500 Jun-09 Jul-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 Jun-11 Nifty TCS (RHS) 1500 1200 900 600 300
Valuation
Demand environment continues to be robust led by discretionary spending across verticals and service lines. TCS was the key beneficiary of market and mind share gain post FY09 and continues to outperform its peers driven by scale and efficiency. Exhibit 20: Financial Performance
(| crore) Net sales EBITDA EBITDA Margins (%) Net Profit FY08 22863 5950 26.0 5082 FY09 27813 7178 25.8 5172 FY10 30028 8679 28.9 6873 FY11 37321 11189 30.0 8683 CAGR (%) 18 23 20
(%)
FY08
FY09
FY10
FII
DII
Analysts name
Abhishek Shindadkar [email protected] Aishwariya K P L [email protected]
FY11
Page 36
Biocon (Biocon)
| 340
Key ratio
EPS (|) PE (x) EV/EBITDA (x) P/BV (x) RoNW (%) RoCE (%) FY08 21.8 15.6 11.5 2.3 30.8 13.8 FY09 12.0 28.2 22.6 4.5 6.2 13.2 FY10 14.7 23.2 15.2 3.9 16.7 15.6 FY11 18.4 18.5 11.5 3.3 18.0 19.2
3m 4 10 10 22
6m -15 -13 -4 15
12m 10 11 15 42
Price movement
6500 6000 5500 5000 4500 4000 3500 Jun-09 Jul-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 Jun-11 Nifty Biocon (RHS) 450 375 300 225 150
Valuation
The Pfizer deal has vindicated Biocons capabilities in biotechnology in general and the insulin space of diabetology in particular. Biosimilars normally get less price erosion post patent launch on account of their complex nature. Divesting the low margin business (Axicorp) is a good move for the company to concentrate more on its core bio-pharma business. We see good traction from its research services business also. The cash which it received from Pfizer will take care of incremental R&D expenses. We remain positive on the stock. Exhibit 21: Financial Performance
(| crore) Net sales EBITDA EBITDA Margins (%) Net Profit
Source: Company, ICICIdirect.com Research
(%)
FY08
FY09
FY10
FII
DII
Analysts name
Siddhant Khandekar [email protected] Krishna Kiran Konduri [email protected]
FY11
CAGR (%) 35 23 -7
Page 37
Dabur (DABIND)
| 114
Key ratio
EPS (|) PE (x) EV/EBITDA (x) P/BV (x) RoNW (%) RoCE (%) FY08 1.9 59.5 49.3 16.0 60.8 56.6 FY09 2.3 50.8 42.8 12.1 54.4 51.7 FY10 2.9 39.5 31.8 10.6 57.0 56.0 FY11 3.3 34.9 25.2 14.3 48.9 41.1
3m 23 16 19 7
6m 18 13 9 16
12m 25 22 27 23
Price movement
6500 5750 5000 4250 3500 Jun-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Nov-09 Dec-09 Feb-10 Mar-10 May-10 Jun-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 Jun-11 Nifty Dabur (RHS) 130 100 70 40
Valuation
With the companys ability to almost triple its revenues in the past seven years, increase its earnings almost four fold from FY05 to FY11, maintain strong cash flows, improve return ratios and a constant dividend payout of ~40%, we believe that the companys performance is the best among its peers in the industry. Exhibit 22: Financial Performance
(| crore) Net sales EBITDA EBITDA Margins (%) Net Profit FY08 2361 404 17.1 334 FY09 2805 466 16.6 391 FY10 3391 624 18.4 500 FY11 4077 788 19.3 569 CAGR (%) 20 25 19
Analysts name
Sanjay Manyal [email protected] Parineeta Poddar [email protected]
Source: Company, ICICIdirect.com Research * refers to market share by value as on 31st March, 2011
Page 38
Dish TV (DISTHV)
| 79
Key ratio
EPS (|) PE (x) EV/EBITDA (x) P/BV (x) RoNW (%) RoCE (%) FY08 -9.7 NA 86.0 -967.1 -62.3 FY09 -7.0 NA 17.0 -138.1 -23.5 FY10 -2.5 NA 85.2 5.6 -16.0 -8.2 FY11 -1.8 NA 40.8 5.6 -11.6 -4.7
Return matrix
(%) Dish TV
Price as on 20 June 2011
3m 28
6m 20
12m 84
24m 103
Price movement
6500 6000 5500 5000 4500 4000 3500 Jun-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 Jun-11 Nifty Dish TV (RHS) 100 80 60 40 20 0
Valuation
Being the market leader in a booming industry the stock has fared well appreciating over 94% in the last 12 months. The company is well capitalised to fund the next phase of growth. The governments renewed thrust on digitisation and positive PAT would be next triggers. We recommend Dish TV as our top pick in the sector. Exhibit 23: Financial Performance
(| crore) Net sales EBITDA EBITDA Margins (%) Net Profit
Source: Company, ICICIdirect.com Research
Analysts name
Karan Mittal [email protected]
CAGR (%) 52 NA NA
Page 39
Key ratio
EPS (|) PE (x) EV/EBITDA (x) P/BV (x) RoNW (%) RoCE (%) FY08 3.1 47.9 27.9 11.7 29.5 34.2 FY09 3.6 42.2 23.9 9.6 25.0 32.4 FY10 6.3 23.7 14.4 5.8 31.0 41.7 FY11 7.8 19.1 14.1 4.7 26.9 32.4
3m 15 21 -14
6m -6 20 -34
12m 17 24 -46
Price movement
6500 6000 5500 5000 4500 4000 3500 Dec-09 Dec-10 Jun-09 Jun-10 Sep-09 Mar-10 Sep-10 Mar-11 Jun-11
15 16 FY11
Nifty
Exide (RHS)
Valuation
Analysts name
Karan Mittal [email protected] Nishant Vass [email protected]
The stock has always commanded a valuation premium in comparison to its competitors due to its dominant market share with higher than industry margins and return ratios. The backward integration also insulates EIL to a certain extent from commodity price vagaries. We recommend the stock be accumulated as the structural growth story of the automotive industry is expected to continue in the long-term. Exhibit 24: Financial Performance
(| crore) Net sales EBITDA EBITDA Margins (%) Net Profit FY08 2845 469 16.5 250 FY09 3393 545 16.1 284 FY10 3794 889 23.4 537 FY11 4576 901 19.7 633 CAGR (%) 17 24 36
Page 40
Key ratio
Net Profit (| Cr) EPS (|) Growth (%) ABV (|) P/E (x) Price / Book (x) Price / Adj Book (x GNPA (%) NNPA (%) RoNA (%) RoE (%)
RoE expansion- A turnaround story Federal Bank is a turnaround story of optimum financial leverage bolstered by operational restructuring under way leading to improvement in RoE from 13.5% currently to over 17% It is a leader among south based old private sector banks (across all parameters like branch network, NIM, efficiency and size) serving through 743 branches. The bank is shedding the regional tag and aiming at a pan-India presence The bank is in the process of successfully implementing the business transformation roadmap suggested by the Boston Consultancy Group (BCG). This is expected to help the bank in cementing its position as a new generation private sector bank One of the leanest cost structures among peers (CI ratio of 36%) Going ahead The banks credit disbursal policy and improving loan monitoring system will moderate asset quality concern ahead. We, therefore, see lower provisioning cost enabling healthy PAT growth RoE deteriorated during FY10 (@10%) due to low business growth and unutilised funds raised through rights issue in FY0809. Healthy business growth (above industry average) is expected to help the bank retain its position among top five private players in the country The story will revolve around the leadership of CEO Shyam Srinivasan. This is expected to take the bank to the next level of high growth, which would improve the RoE The kicker to the NII growth would come from healthy loan growth of 20% and controlled cost structure. PAT growth would remain healthy in the backdrop of restrained credit cost NIM, which is healthy at 4%, is expected to stay within a range of 3.5-4% on account of low cost deposit franchise of 35-40% (CASA and NRI deposits) and asset growth focused towards SME and retail segment where margins are better
Price movement
500 400 300 200 100 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 Jan-10 Feb-10 Apr-10 May-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Apr-11 May-11 Federal Bank Nifty (RHS) 3000 1000 7000 5000
Valuation
We believe the banks return ratios are set to improve (RoE of 17%+) supported by healthy business growth of 20-25% CAGR over the coming years. Management capability and higher capital adequacy ratio at 16.7% will be key triggers, going ahead. Exhibit 25: Financial Performance
(| crore) NII Other Income PPP Net Profit
Source: Company, ICICIdirect.com Research
FII
DII
Analysts name
Kajal Gandhi [email protected] Viraj Gandhi [email protected] Mani.Arora [email protected]
CAGR (%) 26 9 22 17
Page 41
Key ratio
EPS (|) PE (x) EV/EBITDA (x) P/BV (x) RoNW (%) RoCE (%) FY08 25.4 11.7 10.3 4.9 41.6 34.2 FY09 7.7 39.0 22.1 4.7 19.4 16.4 FY10 12.2 24.3 15.8 3.4 14.1 14.8 FY11 16.9 17.6 16.7 4.0 22.5 16.7
3M 10 10 22 10
6M -13 8 15 -4
12M 11 39 42 15
Price movement
6500 5500 4500 3500 Jun-09 Jul-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 Jun-11 Nifty Glenmark (RHS) 450 375 300 225 150
(%)
4 FY08
3 FY09
FY10
FY11
FII
DII
Valuation
Analysts name
Siddhant Khandekar [email protected] Krishna Kiran Konduri [email protected]
Glenmark is building a niche pipeline for the US market. We believe recently launched products and FTFs (to start from FY12) will drive growth in sales. It is also building a healthy pipeline for the domestic market. The recent deal with Sanofi for out-licensing biological molecule augurs well as it will generate steady cash flows for debt reduction besides milking the R&D pipeline. We remain positive on the stock. Exhibit 26: Financial Performance
(| crore) Net sales EBITDA EBITDA Margins (%) Net Profit
Source: Company, ICICIdirect.com Research
Page 42
Key ratio
EPS (|) PE (x) EV/EBITDA (x) P/BV (x) RoNW (%) RoCE (%) FY08 1.8 54.6 17.6 4.8 9.0 10.0 FY09 2.2 44.2 15.6 4.5 10.0 11.0 FY10 7.4 13.2 7.1 3.5 26.0 25.0 FY11 9.0 10.8 7.2 2.7 25.0 24.0
3m -6 22 19 -4
6m -21 8 9 -15
12m -2 37 79 -9
Price movement
6500 6000 5500 5000 4500 4000 3500 Jun-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 Jun-11 Nifty GSPL (RHS)
13
Valuation
We believe that steady growth in volumes and profitability, an extensive pipeline network in Gujarat and ambitious expansion plans in and outside the state bolster our bullish view on the stock. A new pipeline would also add value to the stock, going forward. Exhibit 27: Financial Performance
(| crore) Net sales EBITDA EBITDA Margins (%) Net Profit
Source: Company, ICICIdirect.com Research
Analysts name
Mayur Matani [email protected] Nishit Zota [email protected]
CAGR (%) 36 39 2 72
Page 43
Key ratio
EPS (|) PE (x) EV/Sales (x) EV/EBITDA (x) P/BV (x) RoNW (%) RoCE (%) FY08 -75.7 NA 1.5 NA 1.2 -20.5 -7.8 FY09 -111.4 NA 1.4 NA 0.7 -30.3 -10.0 FY10 -48.7 NA 1.4 16.1 2.4 -21.4 0.5 FY11 -10.0 NA 1.1 10.5 2.2 -5.1 4.0
3m -3 -7 -23
Price movement
7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 Jun-09 Jul-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 Jun-11 900 700 500 300 100
Nifty
JetAirways (RHS)
(%)
Valuations
We believe the company should command a premium over its peer group on account of its presence across all matrices, its best services and focused management team. The stock is currently trading near 52 week low levels due to the concern on rising jet fuel prices. This, in turn, resulted from the recent disruption in production of sweet crude in Libya. With demand continuing to remain healthy, we believe any potential fall in oil prices will improve the companys profitability significantly. The stock is currently available at 1.1x FY11 EV/sales (i.e. at a 25% discount to its comparable peer matrix). We, therefore, recommend Jet Airways as one of our top picks in our model portfolio. Exhibit 28: Financial Performance
(| crore) Net sales EBITDA EBITDA Margins (%) Net Profit FY08 10246 -163 -1.6 -654 FY09 13078 -859 -6.6 -961 FY10 11876 1062 8.9 -420 FY11 14529 1576 10.8 -86 CAGR (%) 12 NA NA NA
FY08
FY09
FY10
FII
DII
Analysts name
Rashesh Shah [email protected] Vijay Goel [email protected] Hitesh Taunk [email protected]
FY11
Page 44
JP Associates (JAIASS)
| 79
Key ratio
EPS (|) PE (x) P/BV(x) EV/EBITDA (x) RoCE (%) RoNW (%) FY08 2.8 29.5 3.8 22.0 8.4 16.3 FY09 4.2 18.8 2.5 15.8 8.6 15.9 FY10 4.2 18.8 2.0 13.3 8.0 11.7 FY11 3.6 22.2 1.7 10.8 8.0 12.7
3m -4 -8 -5
12m -39 9 6
24m -41 25 39
Price movement
6600 6000 5400 4800 4200 3600 3000 Jun-09 Jul-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 Jun-11 300 250 200 150 100 50 0
Nifty
JAL (R.H.S)
(%)
FY08
FY09
FY10
FY11
FII
DII
Valuation
At the CMP, the stock is trading at 22.2x FY11 earning estimates and 1.7x FY11 P/BV. With the significant expansion in the power, cement and real estate development, we expect JALs earnings to grow exponentially over the next five years. Furthermore, JAL is the only player that provides exposure in infrastructure across the value chain (material, developers and EPC capabilities). Exhibit 29: Financial Performance
| crore Net sales EBITDA EBITDA margin (%) Net profit FY08 3984.8 1096.9 27.5 597.2 FY09 5792.6 1704.5 29.4 892.7 FY10 10088.9 2311.4 22.9 893.9 FY11 12966.5 2888.7 22.3 755.2 CAGR(%) 48.2 38.1 8.1
Analysts name
Deepak Purswani [email protected] Bhupendra Tiwary [email protected]
Page 45
Key ratio
EPS (|) PE (x) EV/EBITDA (x) P/BV (x) RoNW (%) RoCE (%)
NM- Not Meaningful
3m 23 -5 2 -28
6m 20 -3 2 -33
12m -4 -7 19 -39
Revenues and EBIT margins stabilise Subsequent to its takeover of Mahindra Satyam and having faced several headwinds during the initial 12-18 months, the new management has laid the foundation for rebuilding the company Two of the three year transformation strategy has elapsed wherein the management arrested revenue decline and employee attrition. Further, it increased its efforts to improve customer confidence In Q4FY11, the company reported a sequential revenue growth of 7.5%, one of the highest in the industry and EBIT margins of 9.7% vs. 2.5% in Q2FY11 The company has settled most of the legal issues Merger with Tech Mahindra could be a positive trigger The company plans to add ~17,000 employees in the next three years. This suggests demand traction
Price movement
6500 6000 5500 5000 4500 4000 3500 Jun-09 Jul-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 Jun-11 140 120 100 80 60 40
Nifty
Satyam (RHS)
Going ahead Expect revenues to grow in-line with industry average (~18% YoY) helped in part by volume growth Business mix improvement and cost rationalisation led by flattening of the employee pyramid could aid EBIT margin improvement, going forward The company is likely to file US GAAP numbers by OctoberNovember 2011. This could be a positive development Indian GAAP financials have been reinstated. Revenue and net profit have stabilised Improvement in revenue and operating performance would be a key trigger for valuation re-rating
Valuation
9 5 9 4
The demand environment continues to be robust led by discretionary spending across verticals and service lines. Mahindra Satyam continues to add new clients. We believe the restructuring exercise is on track and could yield meaningful results from here. From a valuation perspective, the company is available at 1.9x sales vs. ~6x for Tier I IT companies. Exhibit 30: Financial Performance
(| crore) Net sales EBITDA EBITDA Margins (%) Net Profit
Source: Company, ICICIdirect.com Research
Analysts name
Abhishek Shindadkar [email protected] Aishwariya K P L [email protected]
Page 46
Key ratio
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 EPS (|) 9.0 7.7 13.9 15.8 PE (x) 26.1 30.6 16.9 14.9 P/BV(x) 6.3 5.3 4.1 2.3 EV/EBITDA (x) 30.3 30.5 15.7 10.9 RoCE (%) 19.6 17.0 27.6 21.2 RoNW (%) 29.7 20.0 28.5 20.1 *ratios are calculated on post IPO fully diluted equity base
Price movement
6600 6000 5400 4800 4200 3600 3000 Nov-10 May-11 Mar-11 Dec-10 Jun-11 Feb-11 Jan-11 Apr-11 320 256 192 128 64 0
Nifty
Oberoi (R.H.S)
Analysts name
Deepak Purswani [email protected]
Valuation
At the CMP, the stock is trading at 2.3x FY11 P/BV. Oberoi with a strong launch pipeline, excellent corporate governance and comfortable debt free balance sheet position and strong return ratios is set to command a premium over its peers. Exhibit 31: Financial Performance
| crore Net Sales EBITDA EBITDA Margin (%) Reported PAT
Source: Company , ICICIdirect.com Research
Page 47
Key ratio
Net Profit (| cr) EPS (|) Growth (%) ABV (|) P/E (x) Price / Book (x) Price / Adj Book (x GNPA% NNPA% RoNA (%) RoE (%) FY08 841.0 33.6 1.7 209.0 9.3 1.5 1.5 2.3 1.0 1.0 14.8 FY09 890.4 35.5 5.9 239.9 8.8 1.3 1.3 1.5 0.6 0.9 13.5 FY10 1134.7 45.3 27.4 263.3 6.9 1.2 1.2 1.7 0.9 0.9 14.5 FY11 1502.9 51.5 13.7 317.6 6.1 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 17.9
Price movement
600 400 200 0 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 Jan-10 Feb-10 Apr-10 May-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Apr-11 May-11 OBC Nifty (RHS) 7000 5000 3000 1000
Valuation
22
FII
DII
OBC has a favourable risk reward ratio as it is available at an attractive 1x FY11 ABV. We believe that, going forward, a pick up in business growth and maintained margins would lead to stronger core business performance. With a slowdown in incremental slippages, lower credit costs would boost the bottomline. This would lead to a long term RoA of ~1% and RoE of ~18%. Hence, we recommend the stock as a top pick among peers. Exhibit 32: Financial Performance
(| crore) NII Other Income PPP Net Profit
Source: Company, ICICIdirect.com Research
(%)
FY08
FY09
FY10
Analysts name
Kajal Gandhi [email protected] Viraj Gandhi [email protected] Mani Arora [email protected]
FY11
CAGR (%) 35 16 39 62
Page 48
Key ratio
EPS (|) PE (x) EV/EBITDA (x) P/BV (x) RoNW (%) RoCE (%)
Robust Operationally
Scaling up the trading business via leadership status PTC India is promoted by NTPC, PowerGrid, PFC and NHPC with the primary objective of trading power, facilitating development of power projects & power market and promoting a power trading exchange PTC is the largest player in the short-term power trading market and maintains market share in excess of 35%. The short-term market constitutes 12-13% of the overall electricity generated PTC has tied up for power tolling arrangements (PTA), which should play a crucial role in driving the future growth. Under the arrangement, PTC will purchase coal and route it to the power plant for generation in return for a fixed consideration. The power generated will then be owned by PTC, which it will offer for sale The trading volumes for PTC have grown 2.5x over FY08-FY11. Trading margins have also improved to ~4 paisa in FY09 to over 5 paisa in FY11 Going ahead Going ahead, we believe there will be a marked change in the mix of volumes traded as significant quantum of long term PPA (PTC as of now FY11 has signed 15220 MW worth of PPAs) will get traded as the tied power projects get commissioned from FY12 onwards with trading margins of at least at 5 paisa per unit Going ahead, we expect volumes to increase to at a higher rate as we expect electricity demand to grow by 1.1x of GDP growth and accelerated capacity addition over FY12-FY17. We expect the share of long-term PPA to rise by 11% in FY11 to over 40-45% till FY15-FY16, given long-term PPAs that are signed by the company will get commissioned. This will provide good visibility over revenue growth and stability in trading margins. We expect it to be at 5-5.5 paisa per unit over next couple of years Also, commissioning of projects where PTC has participated in the equity capital will also enhance the valuation of its strategic investments on its balance sheet
3M -2 1 2 -16
Price movement
6500 6000 5500 5000 4500 4000 3500
Jun-09 Jul-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 Jun-11
Nifty
PTC (RHS)
(%)
FY08
FY09
FY10
FY11
Valuation
Macro headwinds have put pressure on the performance of the power sector and PTC. Despite attractive valuations and robust balance sheet, PTC is trading P/BV 1.1x on FY11. Also, huge cash balance (| 650 crore or | 22 per share as on FY11) and strategic investment in various power assets provide huge cushion to the valuations at current levels. Though the stock can languish in the medium-term, it can be bought on a staggered basis as we believe the stock is a potential compounder from a three to five year perspective. Exhibit 33: Financial Performance
(| crore) Net sales EBITDA EBITDA Margins (%) Net Profit
Source: Company, ICICIdirect.com Research
FII
DII
Analysts name
Chirag J Shah [email protected] Darshan Dodhia [email protected]
Page 49
Key ratio
EPS (|) PE (x) EV/EBITDA (x) P/BV (x) RoNW (%) RoCE (%) FY08 0.8 562.7 30.6 5.3 -0.2 2.5 FY09 -18.3 NA 90.7 6.8 NA NA FY10 10.3 41.6 16.0 5.3 14.3 13.8 FY11 5.2 81.7 11.3 6.4 7.2 11.3
Price movement
6500 6000 5500 5000 4500 4000 3500
Jun-09 Jul-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 Jun-11
Nifty
15 8 10 8 5 11
13 6
10 5 0
FY08
FY09
FY10
FY11
FII
DII
Valuation
The robust space addition plans, improved operational efficiency and focus on profitable growth augur well for SSL. We remain positive on the long-term prospects of SSL bearing in mind healthy balance sheet, experienced management and niche positioning of the brand. Exhibit 34: Financial Performance
(| crore) Net sales EBITDA EBITDA Margins (%) Net Profit
Source: Company, ICICIdirect.com Research
Analysts name
Bharat Chhoda [email protected] Dhvani Modi [email protected]
Page 50
Key ratio
Net Profit (| Cr) EPS (|) Growth (%) ABV (|) P/E (x) Price / Book (x) Price / Adj Book (x GNPA (%) NNPA (%) RoNA (%) RoE (%) FY08 200.0 6.8 100.7 44.3 43.0 6.6 6.6 0.1 0.1 1.4 19.0 FY09 305.7 10.3 52.2 53.3 28.2 5.4 5.5 0.7 0.3 1.5 20.8 FY10 477.7 14.1 36.6 90.6 20.7 3.2 3.2 0.3 0.1 1.6 20.3 FY11 727.1 20.9 48.9 109.0 13.9 2.7 2.7 0.3 0.0 1.5 20.9
Price movement
450 350 250 150 50
Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 Jan-10 Feb-10 Apr-10 May-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Apr-11 May-11
Yes Bank
Nifty (RHS)
Valuation
10
1 FY08
3 FY09
4 FY10
FII
DII
FY11
Yes Bank has consistently delivered superior return ratios with RoA above 1.5% and RoE above 20% for the past three years despite incurring equity dilution every year. We expect robust business growth and healthy margins to continue, leading to return ratios being maintained with RoA above 1.3% and RoE over 20% going ahead. Exhibit 35: Financial Performance
(| crore) NII Other Income PPP Net Profit
Source: Company, ICICIdirect.com Research
(%)
Analysts name
Kajal Gandhi [email protected] Viraj Gandhi [email protected] Mani.Arora [email protected]
CAGR (%) 55 21 50 54
Page 51
Midcap portfolio
Growth oriented business with the potential to outgrow its peers Bottom up stock picking approach with an investment horizon of three to five years Universe: CNX Midcap index Benchmark: CNX Midcap Index No. of stocks: 15 Single stock limit: 5%; Sector limit 20% Downside protection through trying to exit the stock if it is down by more than 40% from the recommendation price
Page 52
we have a solution
Investing in FPOs is not denied but these are one-offs. Investment in equities should be a continuous process. Hence, SIPs in these stocks can be considered. One has to ensure that the overall weightage of individual stocks and sectors in the portfolio needs to be maintained as recommended. Portfolio creation is for long term investments (three to five years). Hence, a clear demarcation between short-term and long-term funds is needed. One should remain invested in the portfolio despite short-term market volatilities For a shorter tenure, various other products like technical, derivative calls, Pick of the week, etc. should be used for trading A model portfolio is a distinct product and stocks entered under the same have a different investment horizon and risk-return parameters. Whereas individual stock recommendations like Pick of the Week, daily calls, etc. are short-term recommendations having a stop loss also. Both funds need to be separated and allocations made accordingly You can continue to hold a stock, which is in the portfolio even if the target has been achieved or profit booking recommendation is given in some other independent product like company updates, Pick of the Week, etc In case, the portfolio stock is also a Pick of the Week or part of any other buy call, additional allocation to the same can be made. However, the same should not be mixed with the longterm portfolio holding. For the additional amount allocated based on other products, action as recommended for the same needs to be adhered to on exits also.
How should I use other recommendations like Pick of the Week or other buy calls and yet have a portfolio?
The portfolio is formed taking into consideration the equity allocation only. One may consider holding cash or any other asset class depending upon the overall investible corpus. Once the decision on the amount of investment in equity market is made, one can enter the stock according to the allocation recommended in the portfolio Research is a continuous activity and based on near or medium term concerns or positives, a stock may become Hold Sell or Buy from a rating perspective. Hence, as the portfolio horizon is much longer, the stay invested approach has to be used. If there is an exit or entry in a portfolio, the same will be intimated via portfolio document to be released at an appropriate frequency The answer remains the same as for the previous question. The medium target prices should not change the investment view of a longer term portfolio stock Timing the market is neither possible nor advisable. However, an individual can invest in lump sum, depending on the risk appetite, in the suggested portfolio. The portfolio is built and monitored on a continuous basis. In case of regular inflows, you may allocate the same to the portfolio on a continuous/systematic basis without bothering to time the market The portfolio should be reviewed and rebalanced periodically. Our model portfolio will review and rebalance the portfolios every quarter depending on market development. Therefore, it will automatically take care of the rebalancing. However, in case of sharp market movements, portfolio review/rebalance can be undertaken even before the end of the quarter Existing stock holdings should be reviewed with respect to the objective with which the investments have been made initially. One can continue to hold them if the conviction in these stocks still remains. In case, it is the same as portfolio stock then you can allocate that to model portfolio directly The portfolio, as mentioned, is distributed in two categories of large cap and midcap stocks. Investment advice is given considering the best possible option available Investors may enter or exit at various points of time as per their own liquidity and risk parameters. Hence, providing exit purely from a profit booking perspective is not the portfolio approach and we will always remain fully invested. Portfolio exits may be carried out on extreme changes in fundamentals or index constituent changes. The investment approach and horizon to take profits will depend on the individual investor as we would remain invested to achieve maximum profits It may not be possible to enter the stock at the exact bottom. Hence, a continuous approach via SIP in these stocks or a strategy to accumulate at every dip in the markets may be adopted to enter these stocks
ICICIdirect.com has a Hold or Sell rating on XYZ stock. Should I exit that stock from the portfolio also?
If the research report target price for XYZ is achieved, should I exit the stock completely from my portfolio? I have regular inflows, should I wait and invest lump sum?
How long should I buy and keep the stock in the portfolio?
Page 53
Pankaj Pandey
Head Research ICICIdirect.com Research Desk, ICICI Securities Limited, 7th Floor, Akruti Centre Point, MIDC Main Road, Marol Naka Andheri (East) Mumbai 400 093 [email protected]
Disclaimer
The report and information contained herein is strictly confidential and meant solely for the selected recipient and may not be altered in any way, transmitted to, copied or distributed, in part or in whole, to any other person or to the media or reproduced in any form, without prior written consent of ICICI Securities Ltd (I-Sec). The author of the report does not hold any investment in any of the companies mentioned in this report. ISec may be holding a small number of shares/position in the above-referred companies as on date of release of this report. This report is based on information obtained from public sources and sources believed to be reliable, but no independent verification has been made nor is its accuracy or completeness guaranteed. This report and information herein is solely for informational purpose and may not be used or considered as an offer document or solicitation of offer to buy or sell or subscribe for securities or other financial instruments. Nothing in this report constitutes investment, legal, accounting and tax advice or a representation that any investment or strategy is suitable or appropriate to your specific circumstances. The securities discussed and opinions expressed in this report may not be suitable for all investors, who must make their own investment decisions, based on their own investment objectives, financial positions and needs of specific recipient. This report may not be taken in substitution for the exercise of independent judgment by any recipient. The recipient should independently evaluate the investment risks. I-Sec and affiliates accept no liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of the use of this report. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. Actual results may differ materially from those set forth in projections. I-Sec may have issued other reports that are inconsistent with and reach different conclusion from the information presented in this report. This report is not directed or intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of or located in any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction, where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law, regulation or which would subject I-Sec and affiliates to any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction. The securities described herein may or may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to certain category of investors. Persons in whose possession this document may come are required to inform themselves of and to observe such restriction. ICICI Securities Limited has been mandated to act as one of the Book Running Lead Managers to manage the IPO of the group company of Gujarat State Petronet Limited, viz., Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation Limited. This report is prepared on the basis of publicly available information.