Lehrbrief 15 - Managing Change and Innovation PDF
Lehrbrief 15 - Managing Change and Innovation PDF
Lehrbrief 15 - Managing Change and Innovation PDF
15
Kthe-Kollwitz-Strae 15
68169 Mannheim, Germany
[email protected]
www.giz.de
ISBN 3-937235-74-4
Managing Change and Innovation:
A Challenge for Modern Organizations
Introduction
GIZ operates in more than 130 countries worldwide. In will be improved and adapted prior to publication with
Germany, we have offices in nearly all the federal states. a view to global learning, according to the recommen-
Our registered offices are in Bonn and Eschborn. GIZ dations of the partners or the results of the pilot events.
has more than 17,000 staff members across the globe.
We look forward to critical and constructive feedback
The section Human Capacity Development (HCD) for from all readers and users of this special series.
Vocational Education and Training is seated in Mannheim,
Germany and conducts competence development pro- This manual is part of a series of GIZ publications that
grammes under the banner of sustainable development. Its have been produced as a result of training seminars and
dialogue and training programmes are targeted at decision courses. At the end of this publication you will find an
makers from the public and private sectors, junior man- overview of all available titles in this series.
agers and multipliers from vocational training systems.
Our special thanks go to all the people who made
Since 2003, GIZ's Academy for International Coopera- invaluable contributions to these activities.
tion, Human Capacity Development (HCD) for Voca-
tional Education and Training section has been present-
ing a series on everyday practice in vocational training.
Academy for International Cooperation
The intention of this series is described in the title itself Human Capacity Development (HCD) for Vocational Education
(Beitrge aus der Praxis der beruflichen Bildung series and Training
on everyday practice in vocational training). The section
aims to support its international human capacity develop- Deutsche Gesellschaft fr
ment programmes in the above-mentioned areas with Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, Germany
technical documentation in both printed and electronic [email protected]
form.
4
Table of Contents
Imprint . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
8 Organizational Learning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
GIZ Profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Publications available . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
5
Introduction to the Topic
Change, innovation, quality, expertise and creativity are prerequisites such as a management policy which fosters
familiar concepts when it comes to organizational communication and dialog and a certain hierarchical
change. During the past decades numerous theories and structure at the individual levels. Ultimately, change or
concepts have been developed to face the challenges of transformation cannot be enforced from the top level
complex societies and to fundamentally improve organi- down, but need to be understood and adapted by all
zational structures. To give an example: as early as in the involved in order to minimize resistance against changes,
1950s a number of different models aimed at bringing preventing the obstruction of these types of processes.
about organizational change were proposed, e.g. Lewins We must not forget that to the individual, change and
Three-Step Change Model (1951), distinguishing three transition always pose a threat to his or her current status
individual phases for any process of change: Unfreezing- or even to his or her means of income. Let us not forget
Changing-Refreezing. that restructuring measures can result in the loss of jobs.
Above all, and this may seem contradictory, changes are
During the course of the last decades all industries, from slow processes that are crucial in order to meet unforeseen
the agricultural to the telecommunications sector, have and urgent needs.
felt the need to gradually introduce new organizational
concepts, exposing themselves to a plethora of changes in
order to meet the growing challenges posed by markets
and new competitors. Currently, in a phase defined by
learning organizations, the only viable solution to adapt
to increasingly competitive and globalized markets is
becoming ever more obvious; change management, the
driving force behind new economies and organizational
development, is on the rise, developing in step with
knowledge management. At present, managing change is
one of the major challenges confronting not only organi-
zations but also individuals who, on the one hand, have
to stay in stride with organizations as they undergo their
process of change or, on the other hand, are in charge of
enabling change by implementing and coordinating
processes of change and innovation within the organiza-
tional structures. At some point it becomes necessary to
develop and systemize the concept of change manage-
ment and to consider what prerequisites are necessary in
order to introduce a change management system to an
organization.
6
1 Framework Conditions for Change Management
and Innovation
As mentioned earlier, there are a number of variables This in itself requires the staff members of an organization
specific to the business, technical, environmental or labor to develop a completely new set of skills and competencies,
environment that, in one way or the other, can result in in order to adapt to these rapid and constant changes and
changes or transformations in the different activities of to successfully meet the challenges of the new and changing
organizations. infrastructure. This new environment specifically calls for:
Though it is impossible to anticipate when, how and an institution capable of learning, as new situations
where changes will take place, there are some variables and challenges require new approaches,
which, at a general level and given the significant impact
they have on day-to-day reality, represent changes to our an institution that allocates its human resources to the
societies as well as to the economy. (Refer to chart 1) core activities of the organization, as it is the people
Chart 1, although just an example, does describe a situation who are responsible for its success, development and
as it could occur in a real organization, demonstrating governance,
that a strategy to meet change must take the variables
determining changes into account. This enables the an institution that develops a system for change
organization to develop a strategy for change that allows management, specifically meaning a system that
it to adapt to technical innovations, specifically new enables the organization to meet the new challenges,
information and communication technologies, such as new variables and new demands as they arise.
e.g. local networks, interactive systems, graphic design,
improved allocation of resources to increase competi-
tiveness, (e.g. quality control, zero-stock, etc.), foster
intercultural cooperation to meet the challenges of glob-
alization (intercultural competence) and reduce expenses,
all the while operating in an increasingly complex and
interdependent environment.
7
2 Types of Change and the
Objectives of Change Management
Once the possible variables of change have been defined, Chart 2 shows that initiatives aimed at increasing the
taking the concept of innovation as the outset for further organizations ability to compete can do so by pursuing
deliberations, the next step is to determine which objec- structural changes such as mergers, reduction or relocation
tives we want to achieve when introducing changes and of operative units or the introduction of business systems,
innovations in an organization. e.g. the lean organization, in comparison to an approach
to change focused on the issue of human resources, which
In this context, the different objectives which may pro- revolves around questions of personal development, job
voke the introduction of changes can be sub-divided in efficiency and employee satisfaction.
two specific concepts: an economic approach, aimed at
the swift improvement of the organizations competitive
edge and an approach reforming the corporate culture,
focusing on the organizations human resources. In the
extreme, these two types of change are very differentiated
and respond or may respond to very distinct organiza-
tional and personal contexts and modes of conduct. Is the
objective to maximize the organizations economic value
or to develop and build the organizations capacities?
Mergers,
acquisitions and Personal development
joint ventures
8
Obviously, these are two very distinct focal points of Beyond doubt, the introduction of a new change man-
change, leaving it up to the individual company or agement concept is a challenge for any educational insti-
institution to choose one or, ideally, a combination of tution; on behalf of the institution it requires strong leader-
both approaches, based on the institutions specific ship, flexible structures, people who are used to change
objectives and options. According to Beer and Noria, and welcome it and, in an ideal case, a systematic approach
companies that efficiently combine both of these to processes of change. In this case, the institutions ability
approaches can expect remarkable results in both prof- to adapt to new environments, new variables and new
itability and productivity. challenges will be decisive in achieving the goals.
3) Change Management
Business Reengineering
Radical change, top down, new organizational structure
Lean Management
Combating inefficiency (e.g. reducing energy waste, delay in services,
personnel turnover, absenteeism, level of job involvement, etc.)
9
3 Labor Psychology Aspects of Change Management
Amongst other, initiatives to introduce change always have In this context, managing competencies as a way to
a number of social and personal implications that need to manage human resources play a crucial part: An organiza-
be taken into consideration. Involving an organization in tions success largely depends on the efficient implemen-
a process of change also means involving every person tation of a human resources strategy based on the genera-
working for the organization. Thus, before embarking on tion, structuring and transference of new organizational
any type of change process it is necessary to analyze a and personal knowledge, also known as competency
number of labor psychological factors as described below. management.
10
4 Phases of Change Management
There are a multitude of models and methodologies Phase 2: Developing a strategy aimed at innovation and
which can be applied to change strategies. But, generally change: Generally speaking, strategies can be divided in
speaking, most initiatives to introduce change develop two groups according to their main focus. A top down
along the lines of several basic phases as described in the approach has the organizations top management levels
following chapter: setting up the goals for employees at the lower levels. The
bottom up approach proceeds in opposite order to the
1. Defining the objectives of change as precisely and above mentioned approach. In this case the representatives
clearly as possible. of the lower levels define the targets and objectives to be
achieved by the upper levels.
2. Developing a strategy aimed at innovation and change
top down or bottom up. Phase 3: Engineering organizational change: implementing
an initiative for change will probably not be successful if
3. Engineering the organizations/companys change, the organization and its members are not prepared for
(impetus, feedback, change agents, set date, workshop, change. Change most severely affects the people involved;
further training courses, multipliers, intranet, informa- consequently it is necessary to develop human aspects
tion leaflets...). which help people to adapt to change. In order to mobilize
an institution and to obtain a successful implementation,
4. Uphold and strengthen the innovational process each and every person in the organization must be indi-
(resistance, crisis, overcoming difficult phases). vidually motivated. This means that the organization has
to encourage a culture based on feedback, meaning that
Progress along the lines of these four phases is sequential sufficient information concerning the results which are to
and, in general, changes are only introduced at the small be achieved through the applied strategies is made available
scale and, if successful, expanded to other units or to the organizations employees.
departments which were not affected by the changes that
took place in the initial program. In this context it is also crucial that a change agent, a
person responsible for coordinating the changes, is
Phase 1: Defining the objectives: this phase is aimed at involved in the process. Generally, this is a person from
setting up the objectives that are to be achieved via the outside of the organization (an external consultant) who
implementation of a strategy for change. The following can also assist in identifying change and setting the
aspects must be established for each objective in order to process in motion. There are a number of measures
ensure that it is clearly defined: which can help to facilitate the implementation phase,
such as workshops, courses on perfecting and tools such
A. Priority: Define the objectives level of importance. as intranet services, information leaflets, etc.
B. Measurement criteria: Established objectives, both Phase 4: Upholding and strengthening the process of
quantitative and qualitative, must always be measurable. change: once the desired changes have been achieved it is
important to ensure that they are permanent and to consol-
C. Level of success: Define the desired results to be idate them. This is achieved by strengthening the positive
achieved by setting up a number of standards or levels aspects in order to reach more and improved changes.
that benchmark the level of success achieved or, sim- Changes severely affect people and cause them to reject and
ply, if expectations were met or not. oppose change. That is why it is so important to work on
the human aspects which help people to adapt to change.
11
5 Developing a Strategy to React to Change
Every process of change tends to undergo different phases Denial: a fake sense of safety and security, exaggerated
linked directly to the reactions of the organizations perception of the procedures and behavioral competencies.
members. This is a process during which we slowly begin (During this phase people overestimate their capability to
to readjust our perception and our behavior to the new deal with the new situation);
situation and to the changed reality with which we are
confronted. Realizing the need for new procedures and approaches.
(At this point the idea of taking some risks becomes more
Obviously, we are referring to emotional processes or bearable and people begin to explore the pros and cons of
psychological phases and how these are related to the the changes at hand).
change process and its progress. Below you will find a
description of the individual phases that people go Accepting the new situation: rejecting the procedures and
through when dealing with a process of change: approaches from the previous phase (Entering into the phase
of acceptance requires the rejection of the old situation and
Shock: a huge discrepancy between our own expectations the ability to recognize the present requirements);
and outside expectations plus the new situation. (During
the shock phase people tend to feel threatened by the per- Experimenting and searching for new procedures and
ceived changes. They may be resistant to changes because approaches. Success failure, problems frustration.
their expectations strongly differ from the expectations (During this phase the institution can prove its ability to
posed by those promoting the changes). explore change).
Denial: fake sense of safety and security, exaggerated perception of procedures and competencies
Understanding why certain procedures and approaches are successful and why others result in failure
12
Understanding why certain procedures and approaches
are successful and why others fail. (People understand
that the quality standards serve as an indicator for the
institutions, as well as for the individuals success).
7. Integration
(demonstration of an evolution)
2. Denial 6. Recognition
Innovative
changes and
challenges
3.Realization 5. Experimentation
1. Shock
4. Acceptance
low
Initiation of change time
13
6 Organizational Culture and Change
The concept of organizational culture stems from the organizations culture is not adequate or because necessary
perception that organizations develop their own system changes to the culture cannot be achieved.
of values and beliefs shared by all members of the organi-
zation. Based on this perception we can state that every Obviously, there are a number of factors which can, at
organization has its own culture which distinguishes it least partially, influence and change the organizations
from all others. culture, thus bringing about a modification to the culture.
The organizational culture plays a vital part in every From our point of view, we can summarize the basic
process of change. Organizational cultures are not modi- principles of change to an organizations culture as follows:
fied easily and may become an obstacle or a facilitator to
the introduction of change. For many institutions orga- The organizational culture is directly linked to the
nizational change may signify leaving behind a traditional organizations productivity and profitability.
culture, based on bureaucratic structures and a climate of
conformity, and embracing a new culture that allows Basically, organizational culture can be defined as the
innovative ideas to flourish. Often, the introduced sum of all customs which distinguish a corporation
changes do not deliver the expected results because the from other businesses in the same industry.
Products/
services
Production
Ownership methods
Organizational
structure
culture
Geographic Personnel
situation structure
Companys size
Nationality
14
Managing change is a difficult task. It is only worth the Evidently, it is essential to understand the organizations
necessary effort if it results in a specific economic unique culture and to analyze to what extent it may become
benefit. an obstacle or a facilitator to change, before introducing
changes to the organization. An organizations culture can
Ideals, guiding principles and other moral deliberations only facilitate change if it enables and promotes dialogue,
are not efficient they only result in unnecessary in all other cases it becomes an obstacle.
feedback and repetitive evaluations!
Guiding questions
concerning
the organizational culture
15
9) Efficient Communication
Efficient communication requires the following elements:
Efficient
communication
Communication is a key element in accepting changes to Consequently, it is essential for companies to develop a
the organizational culture. An organizations culture may communication system, as a key element of the change
be governed, e.g. through the dynamics of the interactions management strategy that allows open and transparent
between all of its members which include the transfer of communication to take place between all members of an
values, knowledge, experience and skills in order to organization (employees, departments, management, etc.)
achieve common goals. as well as with the customers and suppliers. This calls for
a consistent establishment of capacity-building programs
Depending on the individual structure of the organization, based on innovative strategies which allow the organization
communication can either be formal, meaning that already to develop numerous communication channels and net-
existing communication channels are taken advantage of, works, both of a formal and informal nature in order to
or informal, when communication processes take place manage knowledge successfully.
on the outskirts of the defined channels.
16
7 From Knowledge Management
to a Learning Organization
Basically, we can define a learning organization as a new Currently, knowledge management is considered to be a
organizational concept based on the continual integration prerequisite for the creation and development of a learning
of the work processes with the process of learning. organization. This does not imply that, in the past,
knowledge was not an essential part of the development
Faced with a situation of perpetual change, organizations of an organization. Still, there is a difference in the way
see themselves forced to respond to a new variable: their that knowledge is presently generated and presented.
ability to learn, to acquire new skills and new approaches. Currently, knowledge acts on itself in an accelerated spiral
It is generally accepted that an organizations and its spinning off innovation and change.
members ability to learn is a significant competitive
advantage. Ultimately, the learning organizations objective is to
continually generate knowledge, gathering, communicating
Beyond this, innovation has also become a critical factor and transferring this knowledge via the structures of
when it comes to being competitive. To be innovative organizational learning. In summary, we can say that
one needs new skills and expertise or has to apply already knowledge management is focused on how to make
existing skills in a more efficient manner. In this context, knowledge visible and transferable in order to optimize
continual learning is required and skills and expertise need an organizations objectives, while organizational learning
to be transferred using new communication channels which concentrates on channeling the generation of knowledge.
play an increasingly crucial role in the process.
Organizational learning
Organizational expertise
17
11) Managing Knowledge and Skills
Presenting Communicating
knowledge knowledge
Generating Transferring
knowledge knowledge
Organizational Organizational
innovation practice
Knowledge management calls for the development of the Ultimately, it boils down to the interaction of the companys
four dimensions of knowledge as described below: creativity with the employees creativity.
18
Presenting Knowledge: viable practice it is necessary to break down organizational
A delicate task that comes with the management of and individual barriers and to create an infrastructure
knowledge is visualizing the available knowledge and (real and virtual) which promotes work and learning and
presenting it, so that it becomes accessible to all of the that enables the application of knowledge and skills. In
organizations members. The way in which knowledge is this context it is also important to develop a system
presented can open the door to a free flow of knowledge which provides incentives that maintain a high level of
throughout the organization. Instruments and tools which motivation.
can be used to present knowledge are knowledge maps,
databases, expert networks, etc. Identifying, preserving,
codifying, preparing, documenting and making implicit
knowledge accessible are part of this task. Communication
can turn a persons individual knowledge into collective
expertise.
Communicating Knowledge:
What do we communicate? Why do we communicate?
When do we communicate? With whom do we commu-
nicate? When answering each of these questions we become
aware of the crucial role that communication plays in
knowledge management. The culture of communication
and cooperation thus become two of the organizations
key, knowledge-based pillars. Communicating knowledge
also includes passing information and knowledge on,
transmitting knowledge, dividing and reconstructing
knowledge and knowledge-based cooperation. Internet and
intranet services, learning communities, multipliers, etc.
are some of the instruments and strategies at our disposal.
Applying Knowledge:
Knowledge can be generated, communicated, represented,
it can be used to certain ends or to establish indicators,
but the decisive factor is, how knowledge is utilized. The
utilization of knowledge extends to important processes
such as using knowledge in decision-making process or
when taking action, e.g. when translating knowledge into
products or services. In order to put this approach into
19
8 Organizational Learning
As mentioned earlier, organizational learning is a process From this angle, the innovative aspect is the importance
aimed at acquiring (creating) new knowledge and new that is given to latent knowledge (knowledge stemming
skills to set the course for improvement and innovation. from experience), to knowledge that is not codified and
in converting it into explicit knowledge. This entails
Above all, organizational learning means renewing the turning the knowledge of an individual or a team within
organizations knowledge base, a procedure which can be the organization into collective knowledge. In this case
developed along several different guidelines: through learning via the internet or intranet makes knowledge
individual learning, by learning in teams, by gathering and skills transparent and accessible exactly when it is
and sharing knowledge within an organization or through needed. This process is elucidated in the subsequent chart:
institutionalizing it and applying it to specific products.
Still, a crucial prerequisite for the learning process of an
entire organization is that the employees can learn and
that experience and knowledge are continuously shared
and exchanged.
Within groups
Between groups
Between organizations
20
From this point of view, organizational learning fosters In this context, it is worth noting the important part
which organizations are starting to give to informal learn-
a participative management model ing as a possibility to generate new knowledge and to
developing personnel skills. By establishing an effective
adaptation to change link between formal and informal learning that allows for
coordination and interaction between the two, organizations
an expansion of the individual and departmental can take advantage of the synergetic effects of learning
areas of activity and can make better use of the staff's potential and
expertise. According to Leonard Mertens formal learning,
staff selection and promotion based on codified knowledge, is too limited in its objectives
and its scope when set in an economic context that calls
an intertwining of formal and informal learning for dynamic organizations. This does not mean that formal
learning is disappearing, but that the areas in which it
an increment of opportunities to interact and to can be applied are becoming limited. This means that
communicate organizations have to develop adequate mechanisms and
within groups tools that can be effectively applied to informal learning.
between groups
between organizations
21
9 Instruments for Organizational Diagnosis
Before setting a process of change in motion it is It is important to have a precise vision of the goals that
important to get a preliminary diagnosis of the organiza- are to be achieved through the change process. This
tion. Specifically, this means gaining insight into the requires the use of indicators and instruments that assist
organizations current situation and potential in order to us in finding information and in identifying the potential
spark an internal debate concerning the organizations benefits to be gained for each individual or group. They
strengths and weaknesses. The simple act of diagnosing can also help us in anticipating possible obstacles which
does not necessarily entail that the organization is ill. could occur during the implementation phase.
Every evaluation, how-ever, sets out to challenge the
norm, to search for ways to improve things, to see whether In order to proceed with the organizational diagnosis
or not the current situation equates the paradigm that is usually the organizational culture is best assessed through
being followed. interviews different approaches can be used, e.g.
interviews and workshops. Obviously, the choice of the
most suitable diagnostic instrument
depends on the type of change or on
the objectives that are to be achieved.
13) Instruments for Organizational Diagnosis The level of analysis may be determined
depending on the characteristics of the
individual case, the available time and
the logistic complexity involved.
Interviews with individuals
Group interviews
Hearings
Diagnostic workshop
Written questionnaire
Qualifications:
(mediating a conversation, group dynamics,
leading an interview, feed-back methods)
22
10 Options for Organizational Development
As mentioned earlier, a general definition of organizational With regard to the addressee (individual, group, organiza-
change covers every type of substantial modification to tion) there are a number of activities, programs, learning
any part of an organization. Naturally, theses changes may strategies, rewarding systems, etc. that enable and
impact everyone, starting with the employees working in strengthen the implementation of change initiatives.
the affected department to all of the organizations staff
members.
Individual person
A group
Type of Intervention
Weak spots
(knowledge and skills, attitudes and
approaches)
Strengths
(structures, processes and standards)
23
15) The Individual Addressee 16) The Group of Addressees
Capacity building
Quality circles
Social skills training
Team development
Coaching
Organizational development
Employee interviews
24
11 Resistance and the Change Process
Lewin pointed out that every type of intervention within an 18) Change Management Errors
organization will provoke forces that are opposed to change.
Proposing change may entail the need for people to adapt
their approaches in order to include changes; these people Trying to change everything at once
may have to face the challenge of having to learn something Talk about the changes in advance
new; they may have to leave behind past approaches; they
may have to accept a disadvantageous shift of power and/or Everything good comes from above
influence within the institution, etc. This is why resistance Participation
is to be expected and perfectly normal.
Wrong questions, wrong problems
Resistance can be subdivided into three types of forces Correct diagnosis
opposing change. They can be of an individual, an inter-
personal or of an organizational nature: Obvious and partial solutions
Take all departments into consideration
a) individual: e.g. uncertainty, the impression that the
job is at risk, Appealing for certain modes of conduct
Take real action
b) interpersonal: e.g. differing points of view among the
members of one department
Assumptions
Tell the truth even if it hurts
c) organizational: e.g. inert structures
Dramatization
Although there is no foolproof way to defeat resistance to
Do not give rise to fear
change, there are a number of basic rules which can be of
great help when trying to overcome this resistance:
Islands of credibility
Build confidence
1. Rule: Where there is change, there is resistance!
Regardless of the specifics of the change project, it is results are not achieved, immediate disappointment will
crucial to pursue certain normative standards in order to follow suite. Subsequently, before initiating the change
prevent a vicious circle that may be difficult, expensive and process, it is essential that all goals to be obtained are
time-consuming to break. The following recommendations analyzed carefully. Consider how and where within the
can serve as good practice guidelines for general use. organization, with which resources, with whom, how and
when this can be achieved and what results and benefits
Evidently, before implementing a change management are to be expected. It is definitively not about beginning
model, it is highly recommendable to undertake every with change management, but about finding out how to
precaution to ensure that the first encounters with change do it best, using the adequate methods and parameters
are positive. When considering these kinds of initiatives, and using the available resources most efficiently and
false hopes are easily given rise to, but, if the desired productively.
25
12 Key Factors in Change Management:
Organizational Culture
Successful companies realize that, on the one hand, the achieved by establishing an organizational culture which
key to their success lies in the high level of motivation, is defined by the exchange of knowledge and open
commitment and effort of their staff members and, on the communication within and between the different levels
other hand, in their capacity to generate new knowledge and departments of the organization. This creates an
and to incorporate it in their products and services. environment that promotes innovation and life-long
learning.
These institutions distinguish themselves by giving impetus
to an organizational culture that fosters innovation and
creativity thus creating an infrastructure that facilitates
change and helps overcome resistance. This can only be
Spirit of creativity
Communication
Overcoming
conflicts
Transmitting values
Cohesion
and organizational
identity
26
Bibliography
Anderson, D./Ackerman-Anderson, L. S. (2001): Senge, Peter (2000). The Dance of Change: The Chal-
Beyond change management. Advanced strategies for lenges of Sustaining Momentum in Learning Organiza-
todays transformational leaders. San Francisco. tions
Barnes, Stuart (2002). Knowledge Management Systems. A Fifth Discipline Resource)
Thomson Publishing Service Shelton, P. M./Waite, A. M./Makela, C. J. (2010): High-
Beer, Mike. (2003). Managing Change and Transition. ly Effective Teams: A Relational Analysis of Group
Harvard Business School Press Potency and Perceived Organizational Support. In:
Burnes, B. (2004): Kurt Lewin and the Planned Advances in Developing Human Resources, 12. Jg., H.
Approach to Change: A Re-appraisal. In: Journal of Man- 1, S. 93114.
agement Studies, 41. Jg., H. 6, S. 9771002. Sonntag, K./Michel, A. (2009): Organizational Change
Cascio WF/Aguinis H (2008): Research in industrial and and Occupational Health Towards a Resource-Based
organizational psychology from 1963 to 2007: changes, Change Management. In: Schlick, C. M. (Hg.): Indus-
choices, and trends. In: The Journal of applied psycholo- trial Engineering and Ergonomics. Visions, Concepts,
gy, 93. Jg., H. 5, S. 10621081. Methods and Tools. Berlin, Heidelberg, S. 221232.
Fisch, R./Mller, A./Beck, D. (Hg.) (2008): Vernderun- Sulaiman, S./Mitchell, F. (2005): Utilising a typology of
gen in Organisationen. Stand und Perspektiven. management accounting change: An empirical analysis.
Hasanbegovic, J./Seufert, S./Euler, D. (2007): Lernkultur In: Management Accounting Research, 16. Jg., H. 4, S.
als Ausgangspunkt fr die Implementierung von Bil- 422437.
dungsinnovationen. In: Organisationsentwicklung. Tramelan, S. (2005): Wirkungsvolles Change Manage-
Zeitschrift fr Unternehmensentwicklung und Change ment in Abhngigkeit von situativen Anforderungen.
Management, H. 2, S. 2230. Organisationale Vernderungsprozesse im Spannungsfeld
Kavanagh, M. H./Ashkanasy, N. M. (2006): The Impact von betrieblichen Voraussetzungen und Umweltan-
of Leadership and Change Management Strategy on forderungen unter Bercksichtigung der wirtschaftlichen,
Organizational Culture and Individual Acceptance of organisationsbezogenen und qualifikatorischen Erfol-
Change during a Merger. In: British Journal of Manage- gskriterien. Dissertation.
ment, 17. Jg., S1, S. S81. Winter, R./Mller, J./Gericke Anke (2008): Business
Kirkpatrick, D.L. (2001) Managing Change Effectively, Engineering. Der St. Galler Ansatz zum Vernderungs-
Butterworth Heinemann, Boston management. In: Organisationsentwicklung. Zeitschrift
Krejci, G. P. (2010): Team als Entwicklungsmotor der fr Unternehmensentwicklung und Change Manage-
Unternehmenskultur. Im Team Vernderung gestalten. ment, H. 2.
In: Organisationsentwicklung. Zeitschrift fr
Unternehmensentwicklung und Change Management,
H. 3, S. 411.
Mller, K./Liebig, C./Straatmann, T./Bungard, W.
(2010): Puls- und Change-Befragungen: Zeitgeme
Instrumente zur Steuerung und Evaluation von Organi-
sationsentwicklungs- und Vernderungsprozessen. In:
Organisationsentwicklung. Zeitschrift fr
Unternehmensentwicklung und Change Management,
H. 3.
Ogbonna, E./Harris, L. C. (1998): Managing Organiza-
tional Culture: Compliance or Genuine Change? In:
British Journal of Management, 9. Jg., H. 4, S. 273288.
Richter, A./Wendlandt, V. (2010): Inhouse Consulting
als Motor des Wandels. In: Organisationsentwicklung.
Zeitschrift fr Unternehmensentwicklung und Change
Management, H. 2, S. 1419.
27
For your Notes:
28
GIZ
The wide range of services offered by the Deutsche Gesellschaft fr Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH are
based on a wealth of regional and technical expertise and on tried and tested management know-how.
We are a German federal enterprise and offer workable, sustainable and effective solutions in political, economic and
social change processes.
Most of our work is commissioned by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development
(BMZ). However, GIZ also operates on behalf of other German ministries and public and private bodies in Germany
and abroad. These include governments of other countries, the European Commission, the United Nations and the
World Bank. We are equally committed to helping our clients in the private sector attain their goals.
GIZ operates throughout Germany and in more than 130 countries worldwide. Our registered offices are in Bonn and
Eschborn. We have more than 17,000 staff members around the globe, some 70% of whom are employed locally as
national personnel. GIZs business volume was about EUR 2 billion as at 31 December 2011.
29
Publications Available
30
Serial No. Title Language
15 Gestin del Cambio y la Innovacin: un Reto de las Spanish
Organizaciones Modernas
16 Financing Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) English
17 Corporate Human Resource Development I: English
From Organization to System
18 Corporate Human Resource Development II: From Competence English
Development to Organizational Learning
19 E-learning in Vocational Education and Training (VET) Arabic
Basics, Problems and Perspectives
20 The Training and Qualification of Target Groups in the Informal Sector English
21 Ecological sustainability in TVET - Planning aid to initiate and English
implement environmentally relevant topics in selected programmes
and offerings of the development cooperation (DC)
22 E-learning in Vocational Education and Training (VET) English, Arabic
Didactic Design of E-learning Measures
23 Desarrollo de competencias sistmico Una estrategia del Desarrollo Spanish
de Capacidades (Capacity Building)
31
Deutsche Gesellschaft fur
Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH
Kthe-Kollwitz-Str. 15
68169 Mannheim
Germany