Awwww, sheesh, now you've done it, Edwin. Be prepared for a Coach Mel rant. I've been on LinkedIn for over 19 years. Here's my summary of what is and isn't "cesspool'ish." I don't want to discount the genuine and authentic posts and connections I've made addressing some of the most challenging topics, just the LinkedIn Swamp side of things.
- Genuine connections can be made, but they're crippled by "Demi Moore" and "friend" requests from bots polluting the ecosystem:
https://lnkd.in/gXWrBubi
- Bots, scripts, and sales pitches just kill the vibe. Hence my "Mel Rico" experiment, where I changed my first name to "Mel Rico," and ignored any request that addressed me as such. I still get those requests well after changing it back
- In the 19 years, I've applied to over a hundred, maybe even over two hundred jobs with maybe a handful of engagements, can't remember an interview that advanced based on fit (salary, etc), and have never been hired. I get that I may not be a fit but why should I bother applying? I just relied on the power of my contacts and landed almost all my roles...
- Working the "influencer" algos! I want to highlight two posts. One was an inspirational video post I found and reshared (luckily, I saved the video...). It had gotten insane traction, but I guess because the video had Sia's Unstoppable playing in the background, boom, my only 40k+ viewed reshare was taken down. I get the copyright infringement, but the video was insanely inspiring; DM me for a private viewing... I'm tempted to post it here again...
The only other post that received as much traction was in genuine form. I hopped on the "beat up cybersecurity hiring practices train," and the universe answered. Not my most proudest moment, but again, the LinkedIn algos elevated that sh*t up. How about you rank my other content high, too https://lnkd.in/gG9XXYPA
- I've followed the best practices but have yet to see any benefit of paying so much more for the next level account; I'm already spending too damned much, and the upsell isn't going to help me any better. My content, format, style, and engagement aren't a full-time job; help a brother out and stop playing the influencer game LinkedIn; we're just people looking to get ahead, not rule the social media world.
- "Top Influencer" is a cute concept, but let's be real; you can game that system
- For the love of humanity, get off the old code base & enhance your inbox messaging the 90's called, and they want to retire... My inbox is jammed with DMs from salespeople, so I block and ignore them completely! I will not support any automated sales funnel BS. I've installed Stylish and customized my screen to leverage the vastness of space; screenshots in comments.
Rant is brought to you by Coach Mel. #StayAwesome
I've been hearing quite a bit of negativity around #cybersecurity #jobopportunities on LinkedIn lately. A recent article on SFGATE even went as far as calling it a 'cesspool' with a billion users. Intriguing, right? So, what improvements would we as part of those billion users make to LinkedIn's job search function?
Check out the article here: https://lnkd.in/ghpR7nF8
Tagging some insightful individuals to kickstart the conversation.
Mel Reyes Malia Mason, MBA Manny Khan CISM CISA ITIL PMP MBA Cybersecurity Arlene Yetnikoff Frank Modruson IV Kavi Patel Jeff Farinich Quincey Collins Tiziano Devescovi, PMP Jennifer Campbell Kris Thomas Chris Taylor Paul Tartaglione Gavin S. Adam Mason Usman Tahir Brian Whyte Chris Ancharski, Tyler J. Stafford and Patrice Drake #andgo !
SFGATE: San Francisco Bay Area News, Sports, Culture, Travel, Food and Drink
sfgate.com
Spot on Wendy Nather the status quo has failed to stop hackers from committing crime and inflicting pain: "A. I think the main takeaway is that we are often making things harder by sticking with conventional approaches to problems that are clearly not working, and that means we should question our underlying assumptions and try something else. Why do we still believe that the main solution for phishing attacks is to deploy ever-changing blocklists in the heads of our users, all in the name of “awareness training”? We already know blocklists aren’t the best way to defend a dynamic attack surface, and we already know what happens when we rely on the fallible organic matter between our ears. If this hasn’t been working for decades, it’s time to re-examine everything." It's time to re-examine everything! AND apply more holistic "Cyber Risk Management" thinking and practices to achieve success.