Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 40 views

    CCC C C CCC C C C CCC C C C C CCCCCC C CCCCCCCCCCC CCCC R C

    Uploaded by

    Nnaer Ortiz Nasupmilac
    The document discusses amplitude modulation (AM) and demodulation using sine waves and square waves as the modulating signal. It compares the theoretical modulated and demodulated signals to those obtained through simulation. Some key findings are: 1) The theoretical and simulated signals are mostly similar, with small differences likely due to approximations in the theoretical model. 2) Increasing the cutoff frequency in demodulation results in a demodulated signal that more closely resembles the modulating signal. 3) The DC offset affects the peak amplitude of both the modulated and demodulated signals.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    CCC C C CCC C C C CCC C C C C CCCCCC C CCCCCCCCCCC CCCC R C

    Uploaded by

    Nnaer Ortiz Nasupmilac
    40 views31 pages
    The document discusses amplitude modulation (AM) and demodulation using sine waves and square waves as the modulating signal. It compares the theoretical modulated and demodulated signals to those obtained through simulation. Some key findings are: 1) The theoretical and simulated signals are mostly similar, with small differences likely due to approximations in the theoretical model. 2) Increasing the cutoff frequency in demodulation results in a demodulated signal that more closely resembles the modulating signal. 3) The DC offset affects the peak amplitude of both the modulated and demodulated signals.

    Original Title

    Lab 2

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document discusses amplitude modulation (AM) and demodulation using sine waves and square waves as the modulating signal. It compares the theoretical modulated and demodulated signals to those obtained through simulation. Some key findings are: 1) The theoretical and simulated signals are mostly similar, with small differences likely due to approximations in the theoretical model. 2) Increasing the cutoff frequency in demodulation results in a demodulated signal that more closely resembles the modulating signal. 3) The DC offset affects the peak amplitude of both the modulated and demodulated signals.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    40 views31 pages

    CCC C C CCC C C C CCC C C C C CCCCCC C CCCCCCCCCCC CCCC R C

    Uploaded by

    Nnaer Ortiz Nasupmilac
    The document discusses amplitude modulation (AM) and demodulation using sine waves and square waves as the modulating signal. It compares the theoretical modulated and demodulated signals to those obtained through simulation. Some key findings are: 1) The theoretical and simulated signals are mostly similar, with small differences likely due to approximations in the theoretical model. 2) Increasing the cutoff frequency in demodulation results in a demodulated signal that more closely resembles the modulating signal. 3) The DC offset affects the peak amplitude of both the modulated and demodulated signals.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 31

    mlor a uS8SC Lhe modulaLlng slgnal ls [usL mulLlplled Lo Lhe carrler slgnal Lo obLaln Lhe modulaLed

    slgnal Slnce lL ls glven LhaL m(L) cos 20nL and Lhe carrler slgnal c(L) cos 200nL we obLaln
    s
    AM-BSBSC
    () = (cos n) (cos t) =

    |cos(( +)t) +cos( ( -)t)]


    l
    usb
    100 + 10 110 Pz l
    lsb
    100 10 90 Pz
    lrequency uomaln loL


    lor Lhe modulaLlng slgnal m(L)




    lor s
    AM-BSBSC
    ()



    uemodulaLed slgnal







    Changlng from slne wave Lo a square wave



    lor s
    AM-BSBSC
    ()


    lor demodulaLed slgnal


    DS8 AM
    Y

    (t) = (
    C
    +

    (cos n))(cos t)
    C
    =

    = 1
    l
    usb
    100 + 10 110 Pz l
    lsb
    100 10 90 Pz

    C
    =

    C
    2


    lor a uC off seL 1


    lor modulaLed slgnal





    lor demodulaLed slgnal


    Square wave
    ModulaLed slgnal




    uemodulaLed slgnal



    DC offset 0

    S|ne wave
    ModulaLed slgnal



    uemodulaLed slgnal






    Square Wave

    lor modulaLed slgnal




    lor demodulaLed slgnal








    DC offset 1S

    S|ne Wave
    ModulaLed slgnal



    uemodulaLed slgnal


    Square wave
    ModulaLed slgnal



    uemodulaLed slgnal



    9rob31
















    Ze ro -0 rde r
    lo| d
    Fre q
    v ec l or
    3 co pe
    3 | g r a |
    0e r e ra lo r
    3 co pe 1
    3 co pe
    P er| o d o g ra r
    P er| o d o g ra r
    038 3C A V
    038 3C A V
    V o d u| a l o r
    P assoa r d
    038 3C A V
    038 3C A V
    0er o d u | a l or
    P assoa r d
    8 ul l e r
    S|ne Wave DS8SC







    Square wave |nput









    Cutoff frequency S0 nz






    Cutoff 2S0nz









    9rob32

    DS8 S|ne wave
    S|ne Wave

    Ze ro -0 rde r
    lo| d
    Fre q
    v ec l or
    3 co pe
    3 | g r a |
    0e r e ra lo r
    3 co pe 1
    3 co pe
    P er| o d o g ra r
    P er| o d o g ra r
    038 A V
    038 A V
    V o d u| a l o r
    P assoa r d
    038 A V
    038 A V
    0er o d u | a l or
    P assoa r d
    8 ul l e r








    ffset zero (0)





    ffset 1S


    Autosca|e







    Square wave
    ffset1




    ffset 0









    ffset 1S

    AuLoscale










    ;uesLlons
    DSCSC
    1 Comparlng Lhe Llme waveforms Lo Lhe LheoreLlcal ones we flnd LhaL Lhey are almosL Lhe
    same 1he dlfference maybe caused Lhe LheoreLlcal ls only an approxlmaLlon When waves
    pass Lhrough Lhe passbands Lhe demodulaLed slgnal ls expecLed Lo be noL exacLly Lhe same
    as Lhe modulaLlng slgnal AnoLher dlfference ls beLween Lhe modulaLed slgnals 1hey may be
    dlfferenL ln wave form buL Lhe envelope ls almosL Lhe same havlng Lhe same maxlmum and
    mlnlmum and so on
    2 Comparlng Lhe LheoreLlcal and acLual Su we wlll observe LhaL Lhe behavlor of Lhe pulse ls
    almosL Lhe same AlLhough Lhere are smaller pulses presenL on Lhe Su of Lhe square wave
    ln Lhe slmullnk 1hls was L be expecLed slnce square wave ls Lhe sum of slne waves We wlll
    also see LhaL ln Lhe Su of Lhe slmullnk Lhe Lwo hlgher pulses are noL exacLly Lhe same As
    for Lhe LheoreLlcal lL ls expecLed LhaL Lhe power ln Lhe LSl and uSl are equal
    3 When Lhe cuLoff frequency was decreased Lhe demodulaLed wave becomes less accuraLe
    lL seems llke Lhe lesser Lhe cuLoff frequency Lhe rlpples are wlder alLhough lesser ln
    number lncreaslng Lhe cuLoff frequency does Lhe opposlLe maklng Lhe demodulaLed wave
    more accuraLe and shaped more llke a square wave 1he rlpples are greaLer ln number buL
    have a much smaller wavelengLh Also when we lncrease Lhe cuLoff Lhe square wave
    becomes less ouLofphase
    DS8C
    1he same as Lhe uS8SC Lhe Llme waveforms are of Lhe same behavlor Comparlng Lhe
    LheoreLlcal and of Lhe Llme waveforms ln Lhe slmullnk Lhey are almosL Lhe same alLhough
    Lhere ls a phase shlfL ln Lhe Llme waveforms ln Lhe slmullnk Also Lhere are rlpples presenL ln
    Lhe demodulaLed slgnal ln Lhe slmullnk as for Lhe LheoreLlcal Lhere are none
    3 As for Lhe Su we observe Lhe same dlfferences ln Lhe uS8SC 1he ampllLudes of Lhe pulses
    are approxlmaLely of Lhe same percenL dlfferences lor offseLs 1 and 13 we wlll see LhaL
    Lhe carrler power are Lhe same buL Lhe LSl and uSl powers are dlfferenL Lhls ls because of
    Lhe percenL modulaLlon We wlll observe LhaL Lhe Su ln Lhe slmullnk have almosL Lhe same
    properLles Agaln we also see LhaL for Lhe square waves Lhere are smaller pulses ln Lhe Su
    of Lhe slmullnk 1hese smaller pulses are neglecLed ln Lhe LheoreLlcal Su noLe LhaL aL
    offseL 0 Lhe carrler power ls zero on boLh LheoreLlcal and ln slmullnk also Lhe same Su of
    Lhe uS8SC
    6 A) uemodulaLed slgnal 1he effecL of Lhe uC offseL ln Lhe demodulaLed slgnal ls clearly
    seen lL acLually seLs Lhe maxlmum ampllLude or Lhe peak ampllLude of Lhe demodulaLed
    slgnal AL uC offseL 1 Lhe peak volLage of Lhe slgnal ls equal Lo 1 As for uC offseL0 eak
    volLage 0 and so on
    8) ModulaLed slgnal 1he uC offseL ls added Lo Lhe ampllLude of Lhe modulaLlng slgnal and
    resulLs Lo Lhe peak ampllLude of Lhe modulaLed slgnal lor an offseL of 13 Lhe peak
    ampllLude of Lhe modulaLed slgnal ls (1+13 ) 23 v as for offseL of 1 Lhe peak ampllLude ls
    20 v
    C) Su of modulaLed slgnal 1he uC offseL greaLly affecLs Lhe power of Lhe slgnal When we
    use a uC offseL lL changes Lhe peak ampllLude of Lhe modulaLed slgnal Lhus changlng m
    (percenL modulaLlon) whlch affecLs Lhe power of our modulaLed slgnal

    , r
    C
    s por o corrr sno 1he greaLer Lhe uC offseL
    Lhe lesser Lhe power of Lhe modulaLed slgnal
    m

    7
    uC CffseL 0


    uC CffseL 1


    uC CffseL 13


    noncoherenL deLecLors baslcally [usL Lrace Lhe AM envelope So Lhls means LhaL Lhe
    demodulaLed slgnal as shown above alLhough Lhose are [usL very rough skeLches geLs Lhe maxlmum
    values of Lhe modulaLed slgnal 1he effecL of Lhe uC offseL ln Lhe demodulaLed slgnal ls lL adds Lhe
    offseL Lo Lhe maxlmum value of Lhe modulaLlng slgnal lf orlglnally Lhe maxlmum ampllLude of Lhe
    modulaLlng slgnal ls 1 Lhen wlLh a uC offseL of 13 Lhe maxlmum ampllLude of Lhe demodulaLed slgnal
    ls (1 + 13) whlch ls equal Lo 23
    now overmodulaLlon happens when Lhere ls an overlap ln Lhe envelope of Lhe modulaLed
    slgnal ln Lhls case overmodulaLlon occurs ln uC offseL 0 (zero) where Lhere ls overlap of Lhe poslLlve
    and negaLlve envelopes 1hus resulLlng Lo dlsLorLed demodulaLed slgnal whlch ls noL slmllar or
    equlvalenL Lo our modulaLlng slgnal

    You might also like