BOS Entertainment v. Wonderfilm

Case 2:23-cv-07574-TJH-JPR Document 29 Filed 10/10/23 Page 1 of 43 Page ID #:137
1 STEVEN A. VELKEI (SBN 160561)

[email protected]
2
CHRISTOPHER G. WILSON (SBN 264779)
3 [email protected]
VELKEI LAW P.A.
4
6430 Sunset Blvd, Suite 702
5 Los Angeles, CA 90028
Telephone: (310) 601-4626
6
Facsimile: (310) 596-3312
7
Attorneys for Defendant
8
BOS Entertainment, Inc. dba The Exchange
9
10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION
Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312
12
6430 Sunset Blvd., Suite 702
GRIDIRON PRODUCTIONS LLC, a Case No: 2:23-cv-07574-TJH-JPR

Los Angeles, CA 90028
VELKEI LAW, P.A.
13 Georgia Limited Liability Company,
14
Plaintiff, ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF’S
15 COMPLAINT AND CROSSCLAIMS
vs. FOR INDEMNIFICATION,
16 DECLARATORY RELIEF AND
BRET MERRICK SAXON, an BREACH OF CONTRACT BY
17 individual; JEFF BOWLER aka DEFENDANT BOS
JEFFREY BOWLER, an individual; ENTERTAINMENT, INC. DBA THE
18 AMY SAXON, an individual; NINA EXCHANGE
PODOLSKA, an individual; RICHARD
19 DAVIS, an individual; RICHARD
SALVATORE, an individual;
20 WONDERFILM LLC aka Complaint Filed: September 12, 2023
WONDERFILM aka THE
21 WONDERFILM MEDIA
CORPORATION, a California Limited
22 Liability Company, WONDER
CAPITAL LLC, a Delaware Limited
23 Liability Company; WF HARD
MATTER, LLC, a Louisiana Limited
24 Liability Company; WF GROUP, LLC,
a Delaware Limited Liability et al.,
25 Company; LUCKY OWL FILMS INC.,
a California Corporation; EPIC
26 JOURNEY PRODUCTIONS, LLC aka
EPIC JOURNEY FILMS, LLC, a
27 California Limited Liability Company;
28
PICKLE WAGON HOLDINGS INC., a
1
THE EXCHANGE’S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT AND CROSSCLAIMS
1 California Corporation; MARCH ON

PRODUCTIONS INC., a California
2 Corporation; and BOS
ENTERTAINMENT INC. dba THE
3 EXCHANGE, a California Corporation,
4 Defendants.
5
BOS ENTERTAINMENT, INC. dba
6 THE EXCHANGE
7 Cross-Claimant,
8
vs.
9
BRET MERRICK SAXON; JEFFREY
10 BOWLER; WONDERFILM LLC;
WONDER CAPITAL LLC; WF HARD
11 MATTER, LLC; WF GROUP, LLC;
and ROES 1-10.
Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312
12
Cross-Defendants.
VELKEI LAW, P.A.
13
14
15
16 Defendant BOS Entertainment, Inc. dba The Exchange (“The Exchange”),
17 through its undersigned attorneys, for themselves and for no other defendants, hereby
18 answers the Complaint filed by plaintiff Gridiron Productions, LLC (“Plaintiff”):
19 NATURE OF THE ACTION
20 1. The Exchange denies each and every allegation made in Paragraph 1 of
21 Plaintiff’s Complaint which relate to, pertain to, or otherwise are directed at The
22 Exchange. With respect to those allegations not relating to, pertaining to, or otherwise
23 directed at The Exchange, The Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to
24 form a belief as to the truth of such allegations, and on that basis The Exchange denies
25 each and every one of the remaining allegations of Paragraph 1.
26 JURISDICTION AND VENUE
27 2. Paragraph 2 of Plaintiff’s Complaint states legal conclusions to which no
28 response is required. The Exchange avers that it is domiciled in the state of

2
1 California. Except as otherwise admitted or averred, The Exchange lacks sufficient
2 knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations
3 set forth in Paragraph 2, and on that basis The Exchange denies each and every one of
4 the remaining allegations of Paragraph 2.
5 3. Paragraph 3 of Plaintiff’s Complaint states legal conclusions to which no

6 response is required. The Exchange avers that it does business in this District. Except
7 as otherwise admitted or averred, The Exchange denies each and every allegation
8 made in Paragraph 3 of Plaintiff’s Complaint which relate to, pertain to, or otherwise
9 are directed at The Exchange. With respect to those allegations not relating to,
10 pertaining to, or otherwise directed at The Exchange, The Exchange lacks sufficient
11 knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of such allegations, and on

Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312
12 that basis The Exchange denies each and every one of the remaining allegations of
VELKEI LAW, P.A.
13 Paragraph 3.
14 PARTIES
15 4. The Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief
16 as to the truth of the allegations set forth in Paragraph 4 of Plaintiff’s Complaint, and
17 on that basis The Exchange denies each and every one of the allegations of Paragraph
18 4.

22 5.

26 6.

3
1 Exchange, and avers that defendants Bret Saxon and/or Jeffrey Bowler have never
2 been principals in, owners, officers, or controllers of or otherwise direct (indirectly or
3 directly) defendant BOS Entertainment, Inc. dba The Exchange. With respect to those
4 allegations not relating to, pertaining to, or otherwise directed at The Exchange, The
5 Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of
6 such allegations, and on that basis The Exchange denies each and every one of the
7 remaining allegations of Paragraph 7.

11 8.
Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312

VELKEI LAW, P.A.
15 9.

19 10.

23 11.

27 12.

4
3 13.

7 14.

11 15.
Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312

VELKEI LAW, P.A.
15 16.

19 17.

23 18.

27 19.
28 20. The Exchange admits that BOS Entertainment, Inc., dba The Exchange is
5
1 a California corporation that did and does business in California and that it operates as
2 a movie production company. Except as otherwise admitted or averred, The
3 Exchange denies each and every remaining allegation made in Paragraph 20 of
4 Plaintiff’s Complaint.
7 Exchange. To those allegations not relating to, pertaining to, or otherwise directed at
8 The Exchange, The Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a

9 belief as to the truth of such allegations, and on that basis The Exchange denies each
10 and every one of the remaining allegations of Paragraph 21.
11 GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312
VELKEI LAW, P.A.

27 24.

6
3 25.

7 26.

10 on that basis The Exchange denies each and every one of the remaining allegations of
11 Paragraph 27.
Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312
VELKEI LAW, P.A.
7

11 Paragraph 32.
Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312
VELKEI LAW, P.A.
8

Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312
VELKEI LAW, P.A.
14 38. The Exchange denies each and every allegation made in Paragraph 38,
15 including subparts a through f, of Plaintiff’s Complaint which relate to, pertain to, or
16 otherwise are directed at The Exchange. With respect to those allegations not relating
17 to, pertaining to, or otherwise directed at The Exchange, The Exchange lacks
18 sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of such allegations,
19 and on that basis The Exchange denies each and every one of the remaining
20 allegations of Paragraph 38.
9
5 41. The Exchange admits that it entered into that certain Sale Term Sheet,
6 dated October 13, 2021 attached as Exhibit 4 to Plaintiff’s complaint, and except as
7 otherwise admitted herein, denies each and every allegation of Paragraph 41.
8 42. The Exchange admits that it entered into that certain Sale Term Sheet,
9 dated October 13, 2021 attached as Exhibit 4 to Plaintiff’s complaint, and except as
10 otherwise admitted herein, denies each and every allegation of Paragraph 42.
11 43. The Exchange denies each and every allegation made in Paragraph 43
Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312
12 which relate to, pertain to, or otherwise are directed at The Exchange. With respect to
VELKEI LAW, P.A.
13 those allegations not relating to, pertaining to, or otherwise directed at The Exchange,
14 The Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the
15 truth of such allegations, and on that basis The Exchange denies each and every one of

19 on that basis The Exchange denies each and every allegation of Paragraph 44.
10



Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312
VELKEI LAW, P.A.


11

Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312

VELKEI LAW, P.A.



12



Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312
VELKEI LAW, P.A.

13
Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312

VELKEI LAW, P.A.
19 69. The Exchange denies each and every allegation made in Paragraph 69,
20 including subparts a through j, of Plaintiff’s Complaint which relate to, pertain to, or
21 otherwise are directed at The Exchange. With respect to those allegations not relating
22 to, pertaining to, or otherwise directed at The Exchange, The Exchange lacks
14
3 each and every remaining allegation of Paragraph 70.
Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312
VELKEI LAW, P.A.

27 Exchange, and avers that no promotional materials were made available to The
28 Exchange, but that The Exchange nevertheless included the Film in its brochure for
15
1 AFM and prepared the associated artwork. With respect to those allegations not
2 relating to, pertaining to, or otherwise directed at The Exchange, The Exchange lacks
8 Exchange, and aver that The Exchange marketed the Film at the Berlin Film Festival
9 and secured deals for the Film in four territories (with the knowledge and approval of
10 Plaintiff) and also later communicated an offer for domestic theatrical rights from
11 Lionsgate. With respect to those allegations not relating to, pertaining to, or otherwise
Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312

VELKEI LAW, P.A.
27 79. The Exchange admits that it was asked by the producers to tender
28 payment of the approximately $34,000 balance due to Tunnel Post upon approval by
16
1 Plaintiff, and avers that The Exchange was willing to tender payment, though no
2 agreement was ever reached with regard to The Exchange paying that amount, and
3 Plaintiff affirmatively instructed The Exchange not to pay it. Except as otherwise
4 admitted or averred, The Exchange denies each and every allegation made in
5 Paragraph 79 of Plaintiff’s Complaint which relate to, pertain to, or otherwise are
6 directed at The Exchange. With respect to those allegations not relating to, pertaining
7 to, or otherwise directed at The Exchange, The Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge
8 or information to form a belief as to the truth of such allegations, and on that basis The
9 Exchange denies each and every one of the remaining allegations of Paragraph 79.
Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312
VELKEI LAW, P.A.
17
6 FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION

7 [Deceit/Fraud as against all Defendants]
8 84. The Exchange repeats and realleges its answers to the allegations in
9 Paragraphs 1 through 83 above as though fully set forth here.
10 85. Paragraph 85 of Plaintiff’s Complaint states legal conclusions to which

11 no response is required. The Exchange denies each and every remaining allegation
Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312
12 made in Paragraph 85 which relate to, pertain to, or otherwise are directed at The
VELKEI LAW, P.A.



18


Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312
VELKEI LAW, P.A.



19
3 SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION

4 [Suppression of Facts against all Defendants]
7 93. Paragraph 93 states legal conclusions to which no response is required.

8 The Exchange denies each and every remaining allegation made in Paragraph 93
9 which relate to, pertain to, or otherwise are directed at The Exchange. With respect to
10 those allegations not relating to, pertaining to, or otherwise directed at The Exchange,
11 The Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the

Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312
12 truth of such allegations, and on that basis The Exchange denies each and every one of
VELKEI LAW, P.A.

15 no response is required. The Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to
16 form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations set forth in Paragraph 94, and
18 Paragraph 94.


28 form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations set forth in Paragraph 96, and
20
2 Paragraph 96.

10 THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION

11 [Violation of Penal Code § 496 as against all Defendants]
Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312
VELKEI LAW, P.A.

15 no response is required. Paragraph 99 further purports to characterize Cal. Penal Code
16 § 496, to which no response is required. The statute speaks for itself. The Exchange
17 denies any allegations that are inconsistent with § 496 and denies each and every one
18 of the remaining allegations of Paragraph 99.

20 no response is required. Paragraph 100 further purports to characterize Cal. Penal
21 Code § 496 and Siry Investment, L.P. v. Farkhondehpour, 13 Cal. 5th 333, 347-348
22 (2022), to which no response is required. The statute and case speak for themselves.
23 The Exchange denies any allegations that are inconsistent with this statute and case,
24 and denies each and every one of the remaining allegations of Paragraph 100.

21


11 FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION

Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312
12 [Breach of Contract as against Defendant WC]

VELKEI LAW, P.A.

17 form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations set forth in Paragraph 104,

21 as to the truth of the allegations set forth in Paragraph 105 of Plaintiff’s Complaint,
22 and on that basis The Exchange denies each and every one of the allegations of
23 Paragraph 105.


22
1 107. Paragraph 107 of Plaintiff’s Complaint, including subparts a through d,

2 states legal conclusions to which no response is required. The Exchange lacks
3 sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining
4 allegations set forth in Paragraph 107, and on that basis The Exchange denies each


Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312

VELKEI LAW, P.A.
16 FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION

17 [Count I]
18 [Conversion as Against the Wonderfilm Defendants]


23


Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312
VELKEI LAW, P.A.


28
24

2 [Count II]
3 [Conversion as Against Defendants Amy Saxon, WF Group, and WFHM]


Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312

VELKEI LAW, P.A.



25

4 [Count III]
5 [Conversion as Against Defendants Podolska and Lucky Owl]

Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312

VELKEI LAW, P.A.




26

6 [Count IV]
7 [Conversion as Against Defendants Davis and Epic Journey]

Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312
VELKEI LAW, P.A.



27


8 [Count V]
9 [Conversion as Against Defendants Salvatore and March on Productions]
Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312

VELKEI LAW, P.A.



28


9 SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION
10 [Restitution, Money Lent, or Received as against all Defendants]
Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312

VELKEI LAW, P.A.



29

Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312

VELKEI LAW, P.A.

20 THE EXCHANGE’S AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

21 The Exchange sets forth below its affirmative defenses. Unless otherwise
22 stated, each affirmative defense is asserted as to all claims for relief against The
23 Exchange. By setting forth these affirmative defenses, The Exchange does not assume
24 the burden of proving any fact, issue, or element of a claim for relief where such
25 burden properly belongs to Plaintiffs. Moreover, nothing stated herein is intended to
26 be construed as an acknowledgement that any particular issue or subject matter is
27 relevant to Plaintiff’s allegations. Nor shall anything stated or unstated constitute an
28 admission of any kind.

30
1 FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

2 (Lack of Privity)
3 146. Plaintiff’s Complaint and purported causes of action therein are barred
4 because there is no contractual relationship or agreement between Plaintiff and The
5 Exchange.
6 SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

7 (Failure to State a Claim for Relief)
8 147. The Exchange alleges that Plaintiff’s Complaint, and each and every
9 cause of action and prayer for relief therein, fail to state a claim upon which relief can
10 be granted pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 12(b)(6).
11 THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312
12 (Consent/Ratification)
VELKEI LAW, P.A.
13 148. Plaintiff was fully advised concerning the conduct, events and matters
14 alleged in the Complaint. Plaintiff consented to and/or ratified the actions of The
15 Exchange concerning such conduct, events and matters. As a result, Plaintiff is barred
16 from recovering damages, if any. Plaintiff, through his conduct, approved, authorized
17 and/or ratified The Exchange’s conduct.
18 FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

19 (Indemnification)
20 149. To the extent that The Exchange has any liability, it should be
21 indemnified by Plaintiff or third parties, whether they be named or unnamed in the
22 within action.
23 FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

24 (Comparative or Contributory Fault of Plaintiff)
25 150. Plaintiff is barred from any recovery on the basis that Plaintiff own acts,
26 omissions, negligence, fraud and/or breach of obligations was the sole and proximate
27 cause of the incident and any injuries it sustained; but in the event a finding is made
28 that The Exchange proximately contributed to Plaintiff’s injuries and/or damages, The
31
1 Exchange’s amount of recovery, if any, shall be reduced on the basis of Plaintiff’s
2 own comparative negligence which contributed to the injuries and/or damages upon
3 which recovery is sought by Plaintiff against The Exchange.
4 SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

5 (Comparative Fault of Third Parties)
6 151. At all times mentioned in the Complaint, any injury, damage, or loss
7 allegedly suffered by Plaintiff was directly and proximately caused and contributed to
8 by the fault of persons separate and apart from The Exchange, whether they be named
9 or unnamed in the within action. In the event a finding is made that The Exchange
10 proximately contributed to Plaintiff’s injuries and/or damages, Plaintiff’s amount of
11 recovery from The Exchange, if any, shall be reduced on the basis of the comparative
Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312
12 negligence of such other person. The Exchange will seek from the Court appropriate
VELKEI LAW, P.A.
13 instructions to the trier of fact apportioning the fault attributable to any such other
14 person, whether named or unnamed, for any injury, damages or loss suffered by
15 Plaintiff herein.
16 SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

17 (Superseding and Intervening Acts of Others)
18 152. The damages sustained by Plaintiff, if any, were legally caused by the
19 acts, omissions, negligence, fraud and/or breach of obligations by persons other than
20 The Exchange. As such, The Exchange is informed, believes, and thereupon alleges
21 that Plaintiff’s damages, if any, were proximately caused by the intentional acts of
22 persons or entities other than The Exchange, which was not reasonably foreseeable.
23 As a result, those reasonably unforeseeable intentional acts of others constitute a
24 superseding, intervening act that operates to break the chain of causation of any acts
25 or omissions attributable to The Exchange, thereby relieving The Exchange of any
26 liability to Plaintiff.
27
28
32
1 EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

2 (Failure to Name and Join Necessary Parties)
3 153. The causes of action in Plaintiff’s Complaint are barred, in whole or in
4 part in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 12(b)(7) insofar as
5 Plaintiff has failed to join necessary and indispensable parties.
6 NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

7 (Statute of Limitations)
8 154. The Exchange alleges that Plaintiff’s Complaint, and each and every
9 cause of action and prayer for relief therein, are barred to the extent that Plaintiff’s
10 claims are time-barred pursuant to applicable statutory and/or contractual limitations
11 periods.
Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312
12 TENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

VELKEI LAW, P.A.
13 (Privilege/Justification)
14 155. The Complaint, and each of the purported causes of action contained in it
15 are barred in whole or in part because each and every act or omission complained of
16 which was engaged in by The Exchange and/or its authorized agent(s) was a good-
17 faith exercise of The Exchange’s rights and, therefore, privileged. The Exchange
18 exercised its legal rights in a permissible way entirely consistent with and within the
19 scope of one or more valid privileges and The Exchange’s actions and/or inactions
20 with regard to The Exchange were privileged and justified. At all times, The
21 Exchange’s actions were privileged and justified, and were taken for lawful and
22 reasonable business reasons.
23 ELEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

24 (Reasonable and Good Faith Conduct)
25 156. Any and all actions taken by The Exchange were fair and reasonable and
26 were performed in good faith based on all relevant facts known to them at the time.
27
28
33
1 TWELFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

2 (Release or Waiver)
3 157. Plaintiff is barred from seeking any of the requested relief or recovering
4 thereon because of the doctrines of express or implied release or waiver.
5 THIRTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

6 (Estoppel)
7 158. Plaintiff is estopped from asserting the claims and relief in the Complaint
8 by reason of its own actions and conduct.
9 FOURTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
10 (Laches)
Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312
12 thereon because of the equitable doctrine of laches.

VELKEI LAW, P.A.
13 FIFTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

14 (Unclean Hands)
16 thereon because of the doctrine of unclean.
17 SIXTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

18 (Unjust Enrichment)
19 161. The Plaintiff’s Complaint, and each of the purported causes of action
20 contained in it are barred because any recovery by the Plaintiff would be unjust and
21 inequitable under the circumstances of the case.
22 SEVENTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

23 (Interest of Defendant)
25 thereon because The Exchange has and/or had a legitimate ownership interest in the
26 property.
27
28
34
1 EIGHTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

2 (Abandonment of Property)
4 thereon because of the doctrine of abandonment of property.
5 NINETEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

6 (Assumption of Risk)
7 164. Plaintiff knew about the risk and voluntarily took the risk that led to
8 Plaintiff’s alleged injuries and damages, if any.
9 TWENTIETH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
10 (Failure to Mitigate)
11 165. The Exchange alleges that Plaintiff has failed to undertake reasonable
Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312
12 efforts to mitigate its damages, if any, and that its recovery of damages, if any, must
VELKEI LAW, P.A.
13 be reduced thereby.
14 TWENTY-FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

15 (Offset)
16 166. The Exchange is entitled to an offset against any liability for the greater
17 of a) any amounts actually paid by any person for any of the costs and/or damages
18 alleged in Plaintiff’s Complaint, or b) the equitable share of the liability of any person
19 or entity that has received or hereafter receives a release from liability or a covenant
20 not to sue with respect to any of the injuries, costs and damages alleged in the
21 Complaint.
22 TWENTY-SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

23 (Adequate Remedy at Law)
24 167. Plaintiff’s equitable claims should be barred in whole or in part because it
25 has an adequate remedy at law.
26
27 The Exchange is informed and believes and thereupon alleges that it may have
28 other separate and additional defenses of which it is presently unaware. Thus, The
35
1 Exchange reserves the right to allege other separate and additional defenses upon the
2 discovery of additional facts during the course of discovery.
4 WHEREFORE, The Exchange prays:

5 1. That Plaintiff take nothing by way of the Complaint;
6 2. That The Exchange be dismissed with costs of suit;
7 3. That The Exchange be awarded its attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses
8 incurred in defense of this matter, including expert assistance and
9 testimony;
10 4. And for such other and further relief as the Court may deem just.
11 / / /
Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312
12 / / /
VELKEI LAW, P.A.
13 / / /
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
36
1 CROSSCLAIMS
2 Pursuant to Rule 13 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant BOS
3 Entertainment, Inc. dba The Exchange (“The Exchange”) brings the following
4 Crossclaims for Indemnification, Declaratory Relief, and Breach of Contract against
5 Defendants and Cross-Defendants Bret Merrick Saxon, Jeffrey Bowler, Wonderfilm
6 LLC, Wonder Capital LLC, WF Hard Matter, LLC, WF Group, LLC, and ROES 1-10
7 (collectively, “Cross-Defendants”):
8 JURISDICTION AND VENUE

9 168. These Crossclaims are brought under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 13
10 in that they arise out of the same transaction and occurrences that are the subject
11 matter of Plaintiff’s Complaint. Jurisdiction of these Crossclaims is appropriate as

Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312
12 subject to this Court’s supplemental jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367.

VELKEI LAW, P.A.
13 169. Venue is proper because the events giving rise to the matters alleged in
14 Plaintiff’s Complaint and to these Crossclaims occurred in this District.
15 PARTIES
16 170. Cross-Claimant BOS Entertainment, Inc. dba The Exchange, is a
17 corporation organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of California with
18 a principal place of business in Los Angeles, CA. The Exchange is a leading
19 worldwide sales, finance and film production company.
20 171. Cross-Defendant Bret Merrick Saxon (“Saxon”) is, upon information and
21 belief, an individual that resides in and is a citizen of the State of California.
22 172. Cross-Defendant Jeffrey Bowler (“Bowler”) is, upon information and

23 belief, an individual that resides in and is a citizen of the State of California.
24 173. Upon information and belief, Saxon and Bowler, separately or

25 collectively, are partners, members, managers, executives, owners or otherwise direct
26 or control Cross-Defendants Wonderfilm LLC, aka The Wonderfilm Media
27 Corporation, a California limited liability company, Wonder Capital LLC (“Wonder
28 Capital”), a Delaware limited liability company, WF Hard Matter, LLC, a Louisiana

37
1 limited liability company, and WF Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.
2 174. The Exchange is unaware of the true names and capacities of Cross-
3 Defendants sued herein as ROES 1 through 10 inclusive, and therefore sues those
4 Cross-Defendants by such fictitious names. The Exchange will seek leave to amend
5 these Crossclaims to show the true names and capacities of such ROES when the same
6 have been ascertained.
7 175. At all relevant times, Cross-Defendants, upon information and belief,

8 have been agents, servants, employees, co-conspirators, alter-egos and/or joint
9 venturers of each other, and in doing the things alleged herein, have acted within the
10 course and scope of such agency, employment, alter ego and/or in furtherance of the
11 joint venture. Upon further information and belief, there has been such a unity of
Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312
12 interest and ownership between Cross-Defendants that, for purposes of the allegations
VELKEI LAW, P.A.
13 herein, any individuality or separateness between them has ceased to exist and an
14 inequitable result will occur if the acts articulated in these Crossclaims are treated as
15 those of any individual Cross-Defendant alone.
16 GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
17 176. The Exchange hereby incorporates by reference its Answer and
18 Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff’s Complaint as though fully set forth herein. By
19 virtue of their acts and omissions as alleged in the Complaint, Cross-Defendants are
20 responsible for any damages alleged in the above-captioned action. The Exchange’s
21 role with respect to the Film was limited to marketing the Film for sale pursuant to a
22 standard Sales Term Sheet, executed on or about October 13, 2021, with Cross-
23 Defendant Wonder Capital. The Exchange had no formal relationship with the
24 Plaintiff and limited communications with it.
25 FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION

26 (Equitable Indemnification and Recovery of Attorneys’ Fees under C.C.P. § 1021.6 –
27 Against all Cross-Defendants)
28 177. The Exchange repeats and realleges its answers, defenses and allegations
38
1 in Paragraphs 1 through 176 above as though fully set forth here.
2 178. Plaintiff in the underlying Complaint alleges acts on the part of Cross-
3 Defendants, which if found to be true, were unknown to The Exchange at the time
4 Cross-Defendants took those actions and that were not authorized or ratified by The
5 Exchange. The Exchange’s involvement was limited to marketing the film for sale
6 pursuant to a standard written agreement.
7 179. By virtue of the alleged acts of others, The Exchange, has been required
8 to defend an action by the Plaintiff, including incurring the expense of attorney’s fees
9 and costs. Damages, if any, to Plaintiff are the responsibility of Cross-Defendants.
10 Thereby, the Exchange is entitled to indemnity from Cross-Defendants, including
11 attorney fees pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure (“C.C.P.”) Section

Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312
12 1021.6.
VELKEI LAW, P.A.
13 180. The Exchange has notified (and intends this crossclaim to be additional
14 notification) of Cross-Defendants by tendering to Cross-Defendants the obligation to
15 defend and The Exchange from alleged injuries arising by Plaintiff pursuant to C.C.P.
16 § 1021.6. As a result of Cross-Defendants’ conduct and failure to defend, The
17 Exchange has been required to defend against Plaintiff’s claims. The Exchange again
18 hereby demands defense and indemnity from Cross-Defendants. The Exchange is
19 informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that Cross-Defendants refused, and
20 continue to refuse, said tender of defense by The Exchange.
21 SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION

22 (Declaratory Relief - Against All Cross-Defendants)
25 182. An actual controversy has arisen and now exists between The Exchange
26 and Cross-Defendants in that The Exchange contends, and Cross-Defendants deny, the
27 following:
28 a. That to the extent that Plaintiff can prove the allegations of the
39
1 Complaint and that wrongful acts were committed in association

2 with the operation of Cross-Defendants’ business, then these
3 wrongful acts were committed solely by Cross-Defendants who
4 were neither authorized nor directed by The Exchange to perform
5 such wrongful acts.
6 b. That, as between The Exchange and Cross-Defendants,
7 responsibility, if any, for the damages claimed by Plaintiff herein
8 rests with Cross-Defendants; and
9 c. That, as a result, Cross-Defendants are obligated to indemnify The
10 Exchange for any sums that The Exchange may be compelled to
11 pay, including without limitation all costs incurred to protect The
Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312
12 Exchange’s interests by defending against Plaintiff’s Complaint

VELKEI LAW, P.A.
13 and in bringing this Crossclaim, including attorneys’ fees pursuant

14 to C.C.P. § 1021.6.
15 183. The Exchange desires a judicial determination of the respective rights
16 and duties of The Exchange and Cross-Defendant with respect to the allegations of
17 wrongful conduct alleged in the Complaint and the damages claimed in the Complaint
18 by Plaintiff.
19 184. Such a declaration is necessary and appropriate at this time in order that
20 The Exchange may ascertain their rights and duties with respect to Plaintiff’s claim
21 for damages. Furthermore, the claim of Plaintiff and the claim of The Exchange arise
22 out of the same transaction, and the determination of both in one proceeding is
23 necessary and appropriate in order to avoid the multiplicity of actions that would
24 result if The Exchange is required now to defend against the claim of Plaintiff and
25 then bring a separate action against Cross-Defendants for indemnification of sums that
26 The Exchange may be compelled to pay as a result of any damages, judgment, or
27 other awards by Plaintiff against The Exchange.
28
40
1 THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION

2 (Breach of Contract – Against All Cross-Defendants)
5 186. In or around October 13, 2021, The Exchange entered into an agreement
6 with Cross-Defendants, by and through their agent Wonder Capital LLC, titled “Sales
7 Term Sheet” regarding Hard Matter (the “Film”).
8 187. By its terms, The Sales Term Sheet agreement required Cross-Defendants
9 to procure Errors & Omissions insurance for the Film.
10 188. The Exchange has performed under the Sales Term Sheet agreement.
11 189. Upon initiation of the present action, The Exchange sought to tender
Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312
12 defense of Plaintiff’s claims and requested from Cross-Defendants a copy of the

VELKEI LAW, P.A.
13 Errors & Omissions policy required under the Sales Term Sheet agreement. Cross-
14 Defendants breached the agreement by failing to procure the required Errors &
15 Omissions insurance, and by failing and refusing to assume the defense of The
16 Exchange pursuant to an Errors & Omissions insurance policy.
17 190. As a direct and proximate result of Cross-Defendants’ breach of contract,

18 The Exchange has suffered damages in an amount to be proven at trial.
19 191. Cross-Defendants’ breach of contract was, and is, a substantial factor in

20 causing The Exchange’s damages.
21 PRAYER FOR RELIEF

22 WHEREFORE, The Exchange prays judgment against Cross-Defendants, and
23 each of them, as follow:
24 1. For a declaration of the amount that Cross-Defendants are obligated to

25 indemnify The Exchange if The Exchange is compelled to pay any sum
26 in connection with this action;
27 2. For any award of damages, in an amount according to proof at trial,
28 consisting of the costs, fees, and other expenses authorized under
41
1 California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.6; and

2 3. For such other relief as this court may deem just and proper.
3
4 Dated: October 10, 2023 VELKEI LAW P.A.

5
7 By:
Steven A. Velkei
8
Attorney for Defendant
9 BOS Entertainment, Inc. dba The Exchange
10
11
Tel (310) 601-4626 • Fax (310) 596-3312
12
VELKEI LAW, P.A.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
42
1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2 GRIDIRON PRODUCTIONS LLC v. BRET MERRICK SAXON, ET AL.
Case No. 2:23-cv-07574-TJH-JPR
3
At the time of service, I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this action.
4 I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. My business
address is 6430 Sunset Blvd., Suite 702, Los Angeles, California 90028.
5
On October 10, 2023, I caused to be served true copies of the following
6 document described as:
7 ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT AND CROSSCLAIMS FOR
INDEMNIFICATION, DECLARATORY RELIEF AND BREACH OF
8 CONTRACT BY DEFENDANT BOS ENTERTAINMENT, INC. DBA
9 THE EXCHANGE
10 on the interested parties in this action as

follows:
11 Attorneys for Plaintiff
LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH M. KAR, PC GRIDIRON PRODUCTIONS,
12 Joseph M. Kar LLC
15250 Ventura Blvd., Suite PH-1220
13 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
Telephone: (818) 501-6930
14 Facsimile: (818) 501-6935
[email protected]
15 BLANK ROME LLP
16 Gregory M. Bordo
Craig N. Haring
17 2029 Century Park East, 6th Floor
18 Telephone: (424) 239-3400
Facsimile: (424) 239-3434
19 [email protected]
[email protected]
20
 BY CM/ECF: I caused the document(s) to be sent electronically by
21 transmission to an electronic filing service provider for service through the
22 Court’s CM/ECF system to all parties.
23 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on October 10, 2023, at Los Angeles,
24 California.
25
26 _____________________________________
Christopher Wilson [[email protected]]
27
28
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

BOS Entertainment v. Wonderfilm

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

BOS Entertainment v. Wonderfilm

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

BOS Entertainment v. Wonderfilm

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Case 2:23-cv-07574-TJH-JPR Document 29 Filed 10/10/23 Page 1 of 43 Page ID #:137

1 STEVEN A. VELKEI (SBN 160561)

10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

GRIDIRON PRODUCTIONS LLC, a Case No: 2:23-cv-07574-TJH-JPR

13 Georgia Limited Liability Company,

1 California Corporation; MARCH ON

16 Defendant BOS Entertainment, Inc. dba The Exchange (“The Exchange”),

18 answers the Complaint filed by plaintiff Gridiron Productions, LLC (“Plaintiff”):

19 NATURE OF THE ACTION

20 1. The Exchange denies each and every allegation made in Paragraph 1 of

23 directed at The Exchange, The Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to

25 each and every one of the remaining allegations of Paragraph 1.

26 JURISDICTION AND VENUE

27 2. Paragraph 2 of Plaintiff’s Complaint states legal conclusions to which no

28 response is required. The Exchange avers that it is domiciled in the state of

1 California. Except as otherwise admitted or averred, The Exchange lacks sufficient

2 knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations

4 the remaining allegations of Paragraph 2.

5 3. Paragraph 3 of Plaintiff’s Complaint states legal conclusions to which no

11 knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of such allegations, and on

19 5. The Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief

23 6. The Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief

27 7. The Exchange denies each and every allegation made in Paragraph 7 of

2 been principals in, owners, officers, or controllers of or otherwise direct (indirectly or

5 Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of

7 remaining allegations of Paragraph 7.

8 8. The Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief

12 9. The Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief

16 10. The Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief

20 11. The Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief

24 12. The Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief

28 13. The Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief

4 14. The Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief

8 15. The Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief

12 16. The Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief

16 17. The Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief

20 18. The Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief

24 19. The Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief

2 a movie production company. Except as otherwise admitted or averred, The

3 Exchange denies each and every remaining allegation made in Paragraph 20 of

8 The Exchange, The Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a

10 and every one of the remaining allegations of Paragraph 21.

15 directed at The Exchange, The Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to

17 each and every one of the remaining allegations of Paragraph 22.

21 The Exchange, The Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a

23 and every one of the remaining allegations of Paragraph 23.

24 24. The Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief

28 25. The Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief

4 26. The Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief

8 27. The Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief

15 directed at The Exchange, The Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to

17 each and every one of the remaining allegations of Paragraph 28.

21 directed at The Exchange, The Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to

23 each and every one of the remaining allegations of Paragraph 29.

27 directed at The Exchange, The Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to

1 each and every one of the remaining allegations of Paragraph 30.

5 directed at The Exchange, The Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to

7 each and every one of the remaining allegations of Paragraph 31.

8 32. The Exchange lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief