Alkaloid Synthesis
Alkaloid Synthesis
Alkaloid Synthesis
Editorial Board:
K.N. Houk C.A. Hunter M.J. Krische J.-M. Lehn
l l l
With Contributions by
Editorial Board
Prof. Dr. Kendall N. Houk Prof. Dr. Steven V. Ley
University of California University Chemical Laboratory
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry Lensfield Road
405 Hilgard Avenue Cambridge CB2 1EW
Los Angeles, CA 90024-1589, USA Great Britain
[email protected] [email protected]
The series Topics in Current Chemistry presents critical reviews of the present and
future trends in modern chemical research. The scope includes all areas of chemical
science, including the interfaces with related disciplines such as biology, medicine,
and materials science.
The objective of each thematic volume is to give the non-specialist reader, whether
at the university or in industry, a comprehensive overview of an area where new
insights of interest to a larger scientific audience are emerging.
vii
viii Topics in Current Chemistry Also Available Electronically
Thus each review within the volume critically surveys one aspect of that topic
and places it within the context of the volume as a whole. The most significant
developments of the last 5–10 years are presented, using selected examples to illus-
trate the principles discussed. A description of the laboratory procedures involved
is often useful to the reader. The coverage is not exhaustive in data, but rather
conceptual, concentrating on the methodological thinking that will allow the non-
specialist reader to understand the information presented.
Discussion of possible future research directions in the area is welcome.
Review articles for the individual volumes are invited by the volume editors.
In references Topics in Current Chemistry is abbreviated Top Curr Chem and is
cited as a journal.
Impact Factor 2010: 2.067; Section “Chemistry, Multidisciplinary”: Rank 44 of 144
Preface
Natural product chemistry very often stimulates the development of novel pharma-
ceutical drugs. In fact, the vast majority of new lead structures in medicinal
chemistry are derived from frameworks of naturally occurring compounds. In this
respect alkaloids lead the way and consequently a breathtaking progress in the
chemistry of alkaloids has taken place over the last century. Especially over the past
decades, we can follow the evolution of numerous novel synthetic methodologies
for the total synthesis of biologically active alkaloids. Due to space limitation, of
course only a few aspects of some recent developments in “Alkaloid Synthesis”
could be highlighted in the present volume of Topics in Current Chemistry. In six
contributions, different research teams from Austria, Australia, Canada, Japan and
Germany have summarized important achievements of the past decade.
In the first chapter, Mariko Kitajima and Hiromitsu Takayama from the Gradu-
ate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences at Chiba University in Japan describe the
isolation and asymmetric synthesis of Lycopodium alkaloids. The following chapter
is a joint contribution by Uwe Rinner from the Institute of Organic Chemistry at the
University of Vienna in Austria and Tomas Hudlicky from the Department of
Chemistry and Centre of Biotechnology at Brock University in St. Catharines,
Canada. They discuss recent developments in the synthesis of morphine alkaloids
and derivatives. Thomas Lindel, Nils Marsch and Santosh Kumar Adla from the
Institute of Organic Chemistry at the Technical University of Braunschweig de-
scribe important aspects of indole prenylation in alkaloid synthesis. Yasuyuki Kita
from the College of Pharmaceutical Sciences at Ritsumeikan University in Shiga,
Japan, and Hiromichi Fujioka from the Graduate School of Pharmaceutical
Sciences at Osaka University in Japan compiled in their joint chapter the synthesis
of marine pyrroloiminoquinone alkaloids. The penultimate chapter by Martin G.
Banwell, Nadia Gao, Brett D. Schwarz and Lorenzo V. White from the Research
School of Chemistry and Institute of Advanced Studies at The Australian National
University in Canberra, Australia, report on Amaryllidaceae and other terrestrially-
derived alkaloids. Finally, an article with Ingmar Bauer as co-author from our own
laboratories of the Department of Chemistry at the Technical University of Dresden
ix
x Preface
Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 255
xi
Top Curr Chem (2012) 309: 1–32
DOI: 10.1007/128_2011_126
# Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011
Published online: 31 March 2011
Contents
1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2 Fawcettimine-Type Alkaloids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.1 Lycoposerramine-A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.2 Lycoposerramine-B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.3 Lycoposerramine-C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3 Phlegmarine-Type Alkaloids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.1 Lycoposerramine-V . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.2 Lycoposerramine-W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
3.3 Lycoposerramines-X and -Z . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
4 Cernuine and Related Alkaloids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
4.1 Establishment of an Efficient Route to a Common Synthetic Intermediate . . . . . . . . . . 21
4.2 Quinolizidine-Type Alkaloids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
4.3 Cernuane-Type Alkaloids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
5 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
Abbreviations
1 Introduction
H COOH
–CO2
Me
O O
CO2H CO2H
O –CO2
H N Me N
N H H H
O
NH Pelletierine (8) 7
–CO2 7
Pelletierine (8) Me Me
Me
OH OH OH
7 H H
O N HO N N
13
12 4
N H N NH
9 10
acetoacetic acid (7) and the successive oxidation would afford intermediate 9
having two enamine functions in the molecule. Intramolecular tandem cyclization
would produce plausible biosynthetic intermediate 10 having a tetracyclic basic
skeleton. From this key intermediate, more than 250 Lycopodium alkaloids would
be derived by further re-cyclization, oxidation, and/or rearrangement. Huperzine A
(2) mentioned above belongs to the lycodine-type alkaloids.
The highly diverse and unique skeletal characteristics of Lycopodium alkaloids
have inspired many groups to design total syntheses of these alkaloids. However,
there are very few reports of their biological activities. Recently, we have initiated a
chemical investigation of Lycopodium plants, including structure elucidation and
total syntheses, to find seed and lead molecules for drug development. In this
review we describe the results of our chemical investigation of some new alkaloids
isolated from L. serratum Thunb. and Lycopodium cernuum L., both of which were
collected in Japan.
4 M. Kitajima and H. Takayama
2 Fawcettimine-Type Alkaloids
2.1 Lycoposerramine-A
New alkaloid 12, named lycoposerramine-A [19], was found to have the molecular
formula C18H29N3O2. In its 13C NMR spectra, the chemical shift of the carbonyl
carbon signal (dC 157.0) indicated the existence of a novel urethane function in the
molecule. Furthermore, the characteristic signal at dC 88.6 implied the presence
of an sp3 carbon that had an aminoacetal function. 1H-1H COSY, HMQC, and
HMBC spectral data (Fig. 1) enabled us to construct the basic skeleton of 12, which
consists of a fused tricyclic ring system with five- and six-membered cycloalkanes
and 1-azacyclononane, retaining the fundamental backbone of the known alkaloid,
fawcettimine (11) with the keto-amine form, as shown in Scheme 2. To construct
the final structure of 12 by incorporating the remaining elements, i.e., one carbonyl,
two nitrogens, and one oxygen atom, several candidates having the spectroscopic
data mentioned above could be nominated. Finally, X-ray crystallographic analysis
of 12 showed that lycoposerramine-A (12) is the first example of a natural product
that contains a novel 1,2,4-oxadiazolidin-5-one residue in the molecule.
Me Me
O H2 O O
Lysine (3) H H
X 13 X 12 4
(see Scheme 1) N O
H
H
lycopodine-type skeleton N
H
H O
H H O 5
15 O 7 H H
8 Me
16 H H 13 12 4
Me 3 O
14 13 12 4
N
1 2
9 N
10 H
Fawcettimine (11) Fawcettimine
carbinolamine form keto-amine form
OH
H 6 5
N N H N
O H 15 8 7
Me 16 H H
HN Me
O X 14 13 12 4 3
O
11 1 2
N N 10
Me Me 9 N
Me
1H-1H
Lycoposerramine-A (12) COSY Lycoposerramine-B (13)
HMBC
2.2 Lycoposerramine-B
The new alkaloid 13, named lycoposerramine-B [20], was deduced from NMR and
MS data to have a fundamental skeleton of the fawcettimine keto-amine form with a
ketone and an oxime function. The stereochemistry at C-7, C-12, and C-15 was
assumed to be the same as those in fawcettimine (11) based on biogenetic specula-
tion. The configuration at C-4 was inferred from J-resolved HMBC spectral data; an
anti relationship between H-4 and C-7 and a gauche relationship between H-4 and
C-13. To confirm the structure of 13 that was inferred by spectroscopic analysis, we
attempted its synthesis from serratinine (14) [21–24], the structure and absolute
configuration of which had been proven by X-ray analysis. Initially, according to
the procedure reported in the literature [21–24], monoacetate 15 was prepared from
serratinine (14) (Scheme 3). Then the free secondary hydroxyl group in 15 was
removed according to Barton’s procedure. Xanthate derivative 16 was exposed to
radical conditions by using n-Bu3SnH in the presence of AIBN to afford deoxy
derivative 17. Quaternary ammonium derivative 18, which was prepared from 17,
was treated with Zn powder in AcOH to give ring-opening product 19 in high
yield. The structure of 19 was established by X-ray crystallographic analysis,
revealing that the stereochemistry at C-4 was (S), which was opposite to that of
lycoposerramine-B (13). The epimerization at C-4 in 19 did not occur under basic
conditions. On the other hand, 19 was converted into alcohol 21 by oximation and
this was followed by deacetylation of resulting oxime 20. The conversion of the
hydroxy group at C-13 into the ketone failed in 21 due to a labile oxime function
under the attempted oxidation conditions.
Therefore, we adopted an alternative strategy that featured regioselective oxima-
tion (Scheme 4). Initially, diketone derivative 22 was prepared from 8-deoxy
compound 17 via removal of the acetyl group followed by oxidation of the resulting
secondary alcohol, and then 22 was subjected to the reductive ring-opening reaction
developed above. The conversion of 22 into a quaternary ammonium intermediate
and the subsequent treatment with Zn powder in AcOH afforded two C-4 epimeric
ring-opening compounds 23 and 24. More polar compound 23 showed the desired
6 M. Kitajima and H. Takayama
H O Ac O
H O 1) Ac2O H O NaH, HMPA, THF;
8 pyridine, 98%
H H CS2
Me Me
13
N 2) 10% HCl N MeI, rt
OH OH
reflux, 84% 91% (brsm)
Serratinine (14) 15
H Ac O H Ac O
O MeOTf O
8
H H Zn, AcOH, rt
Me Me
N MeCN, rt N 99% (2 steps)
R
TfO Me
16: R=OC(=S)SMe n-Bu3SnH,AIBN 18
17: R=H toluene, reflux, 77%
Ac R NOH
H O H O
O
H H
H H
Me
4
NH2OH•HCl, AcONa Me 13
No epimerization at C-4
C-13 keto derivative
H 5 O H 5 O
H H H H
Me NH2OH•HCl, AcONa Me
13 4 13
O N
EtOH, reflux, 70% HO
N N
Me 25 Me
23: H-4 (X-ray)
t-BuOK, t-BuOH, rt
24: H-4
H 2.20, 2.54
H 2.12, 2.40
C 28.7
C 31.3
OH Z
6 E 6
H N 3.18 H N
Et2NH, EtOH H OH
23 H H H H
Me Me H 3.59
H-4 then 4 42.9 4
NH2OH•HCl O C O C 39.6
+
N N
Me Me
Lycoposerramine-B (13): 46% 26: 19%
2.3 Lycoposerramine-C
The structure of the new alkaloid 27, named lycoposerramine-C [25], was deduced
to be a fawcettimine-type alkaloid possessing a double bond at the C-6 and C-7
positions of fawcettimine (11), and was finally established by X-ray crystallographic
analysis (Fig. 2). Although our preliminary biological screening indicated that 27
possesses potent AChE inhibitory activity, further examination of the activity has
been restricted by its limited availability in nature. In order to develop an efficient
synthetic route to 27 for further examination, we planned the asymmetric total
synthesis of 27.
(S)-(+)-4-Phenyloxazolidinone (28) was acylated with crotonoyl chloride to give
crotonamide 29 (Scheme 5). Diastereoselective Hosomi–Sakurai allylation of
29 with allyltrimethylsilane in the presence of TiCl4 afforded compound 30 in a
sufficient yield with a diastereomeric ratio of ca. 8:1. Next, the direct conversion of
the oxazolidinone 30 into the Weinreb amide 31 was achieved using N,O-dimethyl-
hydroxylamine.
The absolute configuration of the stereogenic center in Weinreb amide 31
([a]D22 13.1 (c 0.23, CHCl3)) was confirmed to be (R) by direct comparison
with 31 ([a]D22 16.3 (c 0.08, CHCl3)) prepared from (R)-(+)-citronellic acid (32)
in six steps (Scheme 6).
8 M. Kitajima and H. Takayama
H 6
HO O
Me 7
Lycoposerramine-C (27)
O TMS
O O O
n-BuLi TiCl4
O NH + Cl O N Me
THF, –78 °C CH2Cl2, –78 °C
Ph Me 97% Ph
(S)-(+)-4-Phenyl-
29
oxazolidinone (28)
O AlMe3 O Me
O Me
NH(OMe)Me•HCl
MeO
O N N
THF, rt
93% (2 steps) Me
Ph 31
30 [ ]D22 –13.1 (c 0.23, CHCl3)
1) CDI
O Me Me NH(OMe)Me•HCl O Me
CH2Cl2, rt, 90% MeO
HO Me N CHO
2) RuCl3, NaIO4 Me
(R)-(+)-Citronellic acid (32) H2O, (CH2Cl)2 33
rt, 91%
O Me
O Me OTBDPS 1) (S)-CBS,BH3•SMe2
34 THF, – 40°C, 97%
MeO
N
i-PrMgCl, THF, rt 2) TIPSOTf
Me 31 quant OTBDPS 2,6-lutidine, CH2Cl2
35 rt, 99%
NOE
TIPSO Me H
H
Co2(CO)8,CH2Cl2
15 O 7 Si(i-Pr)3
rt under Ar Me H
13 15
14 13 12 O
then
H H
OTBDPS NMO, CH2Cl2
2.4 Hz
rt under CO
36 87% TBDPSO 37
H H
TIPSO BH3•THF DMP TIPSO O
Me THF, rt CH2 Cl2 Me 4
then rt
3N NaOH aq 84%
44 NBoc 30% H2O2 45 NBoc
H2O, rt, quant (X-ray)
1) LDA, TMSCl
TIPSO O O
Et3N, THF 1) TBAF, AcOH
0 °C Me THF, rt, quant Me 4
O
2) Pd(OAc)2 2) DMP, CH2Cl2
CH3CN, rt 46 rt, 99% 47
NBoc NBoc
73% (2 steps)
H O H O
ZnBr2 HO t-BuOK
Me 12 Me
EtOH, rt 13 4 THF, 0 °C
N O N
91% 95%
3 Phlegmarine-Type Alkaloids
3.1 Lycoposerramine-V
3
2 4
5S 1 5R
N N 6
11
H H H H 12
7 8 7 10
15 15
16 9
Me N Me 14
13 N
50 51
1) LDA, PhSSPh
THF, –78 °C to rt
2) m-CPBA, CH2Cl2
I
–78 °C I2, pyridine
Me O 3) CaCO3, CCl4 Me O CCl4, 0 °C to rt Me O
52 65 °C 53 85% 54
49% (3 steps)
OTBDPS
1) 9-BBN, 55
THF, 0 °C to reflux OTBDPS NaBH4, CeCl3
OHC
HO
(COCl)2, DMSO, Et3N
CH2Cl2, –78 °C to rt
Me N 98% Me N
62 63
TBDPS group by TBAF and subsequent Swern oxidation of the resulting diol gave
keto-aldehyde 60. Next, 60 was subjected to Knoevenagel conditions with slight
modification using NH2OMelHCl to afford 5,6,7,8-tetrahydroquinoline 61. Reduc-
tion of the ester group in 61 with LiAlH4 and subsequent oxidation under Swern
conditions gave aldehyde 63.
Next, we employed Brown’s asymmetric allylation with B-allyldiisopino-
campheylborane [39, 40] to construct the C-5 stereogenic center (Scheme 12).
Treatment of aldehyde 63 with B-allyldiisopinocampheylborane prepared from
(+)-B-chlorodiisopinocampheylborane and allylmagnesium bromide furnished
homoallylic alcohol 64 in 97% yield with good diastereoselectivity (92% de).
The absolute configuration of the newly generated stereogenic center was assigned
as (R) based on a well-established reaction mechanism and confirmed later by X-ray
crystallographic analysis. The alcohol thus obtained was converted into azide 65
in 79% yield in two steps accompanying the stereoinversion at C-5 position via an
O-mesylated derivative. Using the Staudinger reaction, azide 65 was transformed
into primary amine, which, in turn, was directly acylated with acryloyl chloride to
give substrate 66 for RCM in 65% yield in two steps. X-ray crystallographic
analysis of 66 enabled the unambiguous assignment of all stereogenic centers as
(5S),(7R),(15R) configuration. RCM of 66 using first-generation Grubbs’ ruthenium
catalyst proceeded smoothly to generate unsaturated lactam 67 in 96% yield.
OHC
5
1) MsCl, Et3N
(+)-Ipc2BCl, allylMgBr CH2Cl2, 0 °C
HO
H
Et2O, THF, –100 °C 2) NaN3, DMF
Me N 80 °C
97%, 92% de
63 79% (2 steps)
Me N
64
5S
O N 1) H2, Pd/C, AcOEt, rt N
H H
2) BH3•THF, THF, reflux 7
15
76% (2 steps)
Me N Me N
67 Lycoposerramine-V (50)
Finally, reduction of the double bond with H2/Pd/C and subsequent reduction
of lactam with BH3lTHF to construct the piperidine ring afforded the desired
compound 50 with the (5S),(7R),(15R) configuration.
Starting from common intermediate 52, we achieved the asymmetric synthesis
of compound 51 possessing the (5R),(7R),(15R) configuration in 22% yield in seven
steps by using a sequence similar to that described above via a homoallyl alcohol
having the (5S) configuration, which was prepared by the asymmetric allylation
reaction of 63 using ()-B-chlorodiisopinocampheylborane.
Having both target compounds (50 and 51) in hand, we compared their physico-
chemical data with those of the natural product. As a result, compound 50 was
completely identical in all respects with natural lycoposerramine-V. Therefore,
the structure, including the absolute configuration of the stereogenic center, was
established to be 50 possessing the (5S),(7R),(15R) configuration [36].
3.2 Lycoposerramine-W
H OH H 4.08
3S 3 H (J = 4.9, 4.9, 3.7, 3.7)
5R N 5 equatorial
N Me HO H
Me H 7
N
15R
7R axial
H 15
Me N
Me
Lycoposerramine-W (68)
Cl Cl CHO
Me N Me 15 N
73 Lycoposerramine-W (68)
to yield amide 71. Oxidative cleavage of the terminal double bond in 71 under
Johnson–Lemieux conditions produced b-chloroacetamide-aldehyde 72. Next, the
samarium(II)-promoted stereoselective intramolecular Reformatsky reaction was
investigated. As far as we know, this reaction has been applied only to b-halo
acetoxy carbonyl substrates [41, 42], forming a lactone ring. None of the studies
that employed the intramolecular Reformatsky reaction used a b-haloacetamide-
carbonyl compound. After several attempts, we found that the use of samarium(II)
iodide freshly prepared from samarium metal and diiodomethane in THF gave the
best result, producing lactam 73 in 40% yield as the major product with good
diastereoselectivity (79% de). Careful analysis of the coupling constants of H-2
to H-5 demonstrated that H-3 was in an equatorial orientation and the relative
stereochemistry between C-3 and C-5 was trans. Having considered the reaction
mechanism [42], the stereochemistry of C-3 in 73 was determined to be (S), as
expected. Finally, the construction of a 4-hydroxy-2-substituted piperidine ring by
the reduction of lactam 73 with BH3lTHF afforded target compound 68 having the
(3S),(5R),(7R),(15R) configuration. Synthetic 68 was completely identical in all
respects, including the optical rotation, with natural lycoposerramine-W {synthetic
[a]D25 +21.5 (c 0.07, CHCl3)/natural [a]D25 +22.4 (c 0.14, CHCl3)}, thereby
establishing the absolute configuration of the natural compound as (3S),(5R),(7R),
(15R) [36].
Lycopodium Alkaloids: Isolation and Asymmetric Synthesis 17
EtO2C
12 H 12
DTAD, PPh3 H
14
N Ns
THF, rt 6 13
Me 13 N 15 H CO2Et
quant Me H
Ns
NOE
77
4.18 (ddd, J = 12.2, 4.6, 4.6)
EtO2C
1) PhSH, K2CO3 HO
DMF, rt IBX
Me N 2) Teoc-carbonate Me N DMSO, rt
DMAP, toluene 98%
Ns Teoc
rt, 80% (2 steps)
77 78
3) LiAlH4, THF
0 °C, 90%
5 OH
OHC OH
3-butyn-1-ol, n-BuLi MnO2
O
OH
1) MsCl, Et3N, CH2Cl2 MsO O
0 °C, 92%
in the presence of 0.5 equiv. of K2CO3 in EtOH/H2O (1:1) to yield the expected
cyclic nitrone in 68% yield. Finally, removal of the Teoc group with tris(dimethy-
lamino)sulfonium difluorotrimethylsilicate (TASF) in THF afforded lycoposerra-
mine-Z (75) in 78% yield. Synthetic 75 was identical in all respects with natural
lycoposerramine-Z, thereby establishing its structure as well as its absolute config-
uration as (7R),(12R),(13S),(15R) [44].
Next, we examined the construction of a trans-decahydroquinoline ring to
accomplish the synthesis of lycoposerramine-X (74) (Scheme 16). A nitrogen
function was introduced at C-13a in secondary alcohol 59 utilizing the Mitsunobu
reaction twice. After removal of the TBDPS group on the side chain, the resulting
primary alcohol was mesylated to yield substrate 84 for cyclization. Reduction
of the azide group in 84 led to the spontaneous cyclization. This was followed
by protection of the resulting secondary amine by the Teoc group to give trans-
decahydroquinoline 85 in 89% yield (two steps). According to the method for the
synthesis of 75 described above, trans-decahydroquinoline 85 was converted into
74. Synthetic 74 was identical in all respects with natural lycoposerramine-X,
thereby establishing its absolute configuration as (7R),(12R),(13R),(15R) [44].
Fig. 7 Common intermediate 59 for the syntheses of lycoposerramines-V, -W, -X, and -Z
20 M. Kitajima and H. Takayama
16 Cernuane-type Quinolizidine-type H
15
14 H 12 Me
Me 11
13 N
H
8 NH 10 1
7 10
H 9 Me
6 N O Cermizine C (87)
5 1 H
4 2
C-1 & C-10 Me Reduction - Oxidation
3 H H
functionalization N 1 sequence Me
Cernuine (86)
N
10 O
H 12 HO
Me 15 Me O
13 Key intermediate Cermizine C
H
8 N 91 N-oxide (88)
HH 7 9
N H
1 5 Me
N
Cermizine D (90) 10
1
Me
Senepodine G (89)
Fig. 8 Divergent strategy for the total syntheses of cernuane-type and quinolizidine-type
Lycopodium alkaloids
Lycopodium Alkaloids: Isolation and Asymmetric Synthesis 21
The aldehyde in (+)-citronellal (92) was protected as an acetal function, and this
was followed by the Ru-catalyzed oxidative cleavage of the residual olefin function
to give aldehyde 93 (Scheme 17). Next, the organocatalytic a-amination of alde-
hyde 93 was investigated [48–50]. First we carried out the amination of 93 with
dibenzyl azodicarboxylate in the presence of a catalytic amount of an (S)-proline
derivative as organocatalyst. This was followed by in situ reduction to produce
oxazolidinone 94 under anhydrous conditions using K2CO3 in 94% yield with 84%
de. Next, reductive N–N bond cleavage in 94 was attempted. Sequential reduction
involving removal of the Cbz group under mild conditions (H2/Pd/C), followed by
hydrogenation of the resulting hydrazine with Raney Ni, gave cyclic carbamate 95
in good yield. Upon treatment of 95 with a catalytic amount of p-TsOH in refluxing
MeOH, cyclization occurred to give aminoacetal 96 as an allylation precursor.
Treatment of aminoacetal 96 with allyltrimethylsilane in the presence of TiCl4 at
low temperature gave 97 as the sole isomer at C-13, which would be formed by
stereoselective allylation of the acyliminium intermediate. The NOE correlation
between H-7 and the proton of the allyl group in 97 revealed that the allyl group was
introduced in an axial orientation. The stereoselectivity would be interpreted by the
axial attack of a nucleophile on the acyliminium intermediate that had a rigid
conformation defined by oxazolidinone. Hydrolysis of oxazolidinone in 97 under
basic conditions and subsequent acryloylation of resulting secondary amine 98 gave
acrylamide 99. The synthesis of key intermediate 91 was accomplished by RCM
with first-generation Grubbs catalyst, followed by hydrogenation of olefin. At
this stage, it was found that the conversion of hydrazine 94 into acrylamide 99
proceeded smoothly without purification, that is, the desired diastereomer of 99 was
obtained in pure form from 94 in six steps after a single chromatographic separation
from a concomitant diastereomer derived from the organocatalytic reaction of
aldehyde 93. Furthermore, it was found that the RCM reaction of 99 proceeded in
the presence of 1 mol% of catalyst to give 91. It is noteworthy that the present
procedure for the preparation of 91 required only two purification steps throughout
the eight-step conversion from 94 to 91 in 56% total yield. As described above, we
succeeded in the development of an efficient and practical synthetic route to pivotal
intermediate 91 in our divergent synthesis.
22 M. Kitajima and H. Takayama
Ph Cbz
1) CbzN=NCbz, N Ph
H
HN
O Me CH2Cl2, rt
OTMS
O Me N Cbz
10 mol%
O OH
O then NaBH4 O
93 MeOH
Cbz
2) K2CO3 HN O H2N O
toluene O Me N 1) H2, 10% Pd/C O Me N
O O
reflux O EtOH, rt O
94% (2 steps) 94
84% de
O Me OMe
2) H2, Raney Ni p-TsOH TMS
O Me HN N
O O
EtOH 60 °C O MeOH TiCl4, CH2Cl2
reflux O
–78 to 0 °C
95 96
H 12.2 Hz
7 , Me Me H
N 15 13 15 14
O Me H
N N H
HO O H 13
Nu 7 O
O H7 O
97 NOE
H acryloyl chloride H
8M NaOH aq Me Et3N Me
H H
MeOH, reflux NH CH2Cl2, –78 oC N
56% (6 steps) O
HO HO
98 99
single diastereomer
1) 1st Grubbs cat. H
CH2Cl2 Me
H
2) H2, Pd/C N
EtOH, rt O
99% (2 steps) HO
91
Having developed an efficient route to the common intermediate 91, we next turned
our attention to the further transformation of 91 into quinolizidine-type alkaloids
(Scheme 18). The amido group in 91 was reduced with BH3lTHF in THF under
reflux to give amine 100. Without purification, 100 was treated with SOCl2 to yield
chloride 101, which was subjected to the next reaction without purification because
of instability on SiO2 gel. Reductive dehalogenation of chloride 101 with LiAlH4
afforded cermizine C (87) [51].
Next, cermizine C (87) was converted into cermizine C N-oxide (88) by
m-CPBA oxidation of 87. Synthetic 88 was identical in all respects with the new
alkaloid isolated from L. cernuum by us, thereby establishing its structure [51].
To synthesize senepodine G (89) [47], regioselective oxidation at C-9 position in
cermizine C (87) was required. We anticipated that cermizine C (87) and cermizine
C N-oxide (88) having a cis-quinolizidine skeleton would be suitable for the
regioselective oxidation to senepodine G (89). This is because among the protons
on C-1, C-5, and C-9, only the proton H-9 is situated at an anti-position to the N–O
bond in the activated intermediate that was prepared from cermizine C N-oxide (88)
in the Polonovski–Potier reaction. In fact, N-oxide 88 was treated with TFAA
in CH2Cl2 to give regioselectively senepodine G (89) in quantitative yield
H H H
Me Me Me
H BH3•THF H SOCl2 H
N N N
THF CHCl3
O reflux reflux
HO HO Cl
91 100 101
H H
Me Me
LiAlH4 m-CPBA 5
N N9
THF, reflux CH2Cl2, 0 °C 1
52% (3 steps) Me Me O
89%
(+)-Cermizine C (87) 88
O H
Me
TFAA Me O CF3
5 N
CH2Cl2, 0 °C Me N H
9 1 10
quant H Me CF3CO2
(Scheme 18). In the 1H NMR spectra of synthetic 89, the signal for methyl protons
on C-10 was observed at d 2.45 (3H, s), confirming that the desired oxidation at C-9
position occurred. All of the spectroscopic data of synthetic 89 were identical with
the reported data of natural senepodine G in all respects [51].
H H
Me 1) IBX, DMSO Me
H rt H 3M HCl
N N
2) Ph3PCH2(OMe)Cl THF
O KHMDS, THF MeO O rt
HO 62%
0 °C to rt
91 102 (3 steps)
t-Bu NH2
H S H
Me Me
H O H
N N
CuSO4, CH2Cl2, rt
O 93% t-Bu N O
OHC S 5
5
103 O H 104
1) MgBr
CH2Cl2, –78 °C
2) 3M HCl
MeOH, rt
54% (2 steps)
up to 60% de
H
NH2 Me
H
O N
106
H
H2N O
camphorsulfonic acid 5
(CH2Cl)2, rt 105
then NH2OH-AcOH
92%, 94% de
H Me H Me
N N
N 5 N
HO H HO H
O O
hydrolysis of the enol ether in 102 using 3M aq. HCl in THF gave carbon-elongated
aldehyde 103. To install allyl and amino groups onto aldehyde 103, we initially
adopted the Ellman protocol using a chiral sulfinimine [52]. Condensation of
aldehyde 103 and (R)-tert-butanesulfinamide in the presence of CuSO4 in CH2Cl2
afforded sulfinimine 104 in high yield. The addition of allylmagnesium bromide,
followed by the removal of the sulfinyl auxiliary, furnished desired homoallylamine
105 in good yield but with poor stereoselectivity (up to 60% de). In order
to improve the stereoselectivity, the transfer aminoallylation via the aza-Cope
rearrangement developed by Kobayashi and coworkers [53] was adopted for the
synthesis of homoallylamine 105. Treatment of aldehyde 103 with reagent 106
derived from (1R)-camphorquinone in the presence of a catalytic amount of CSA in
(CH2Cl)2, followed by treatment with NH2OH to liberate amine group, resulted in
the simultaneous and highly stereoselective installation of allyl and amine functions
onto C-5 in 103 to provide homoallylamine 105 in 92% yield and 94% de. The de
value of 105 was determined by HPLC analysis of its benzoylated products.
After examination of the conditions required to construct the aminal ring system,
amidine 107 was obtained by treating amine 105 with TiCl4 in refluxing xylene
(Scheme 20). The absolute configuration at C-5, which was constructed by the
transfer aminoallylation described above, was determined to be (S) from the NOE
correlation between H-7 and H-5. Amidine 107 was treated with 1 equiv. of AcOH
in EtOH and then the imine moiety in the resulting acetate was stereoselectively
reduced with NaBH4 to give aminal 108. Obtained aminal 108 was directly acylated
with acryloyl chloride and Et3N to provide acrylamide 109. The stereochemistry at
C-9 was confirmed by NOE experiment in which significant NOE between H-9 and
H-13 was observed. This stereoselectivity can be expected from the attack of
hydride from the convex face of 107. Thus, the characteristic cyclic aminal moiety
H H H H H NOE
Me Me NaBH4 Me acryloyl chloride Me
TiCl4 Et3N H13 H
H H AcOH H H
N N N N
H xylene 7
H EtOH H CH2Cl2 H 9
H2N O reflux NOE N rt NH –78 °C N O
5 5
80% 62% (2 steps)
H H 1) LiAlH4 H H
Me 1) 1st Grubbs cat. Me THF, reflux Me Me
H CH2Cl2, rt H 60% H H H
N N N N
HH 2) H2, Pd/C HH 2) TFA HH H
O N O EtOH, rt O N O N TFA N O
95% (2 steps)
The spectroscopic data of synthetic 86 were in agreement with those of the natural
product in all respects. Therefore, the structure of cernuine (86), including the
absolute configuration, was confirmed [54].
Next, we investigated the synthesis of cermizine D (90) from homoallylamine
105. According to the synthesis of cernuine (86) described above, 105 was acylated
with acryloyl chloride to give acrylamide 110. RCM with first-generation Grubbs
catalyst and subsequent hydrogenation afforded bisamide 111. Reduction of bisa-
mide 111 with LiAlH4 in THF completed the synthesis of cermizine D (90).
As described above, the divergent asymmetric total syntheses of cernuane- and
quinolizidine-type Lycopodium alkaloids were accomplished. The first asymmetric
total synthesis of cernuine (86) was achieved starting from the easily available
(+)-citronellal in 9.6% overall yield in 21 steps. Furthermore, we have succeeded in
the syntheses of cermizine D (90), cermizine C (87), cermizine C N-oxide (88), and
senepodine G (89) from common key intermediate 91, and have established an
efficient synthetic route to cernuane- and quinolizidine-type Lycopodium alkaloids.
5 Conclusion
Lycopodium alkaloids have attracted the attention of many natural product chemists
and synthetic organic chemists due to their important biological activities and
unique skeletal characteristics. A number of elegant total syntheses of many
kinds of Lycopodium alkaloids have been reported in recent years (Fig. 9) (selected
reports on the total synthesis of Lycopodium alkaloids by other researchers in
recent years [28, 55–78]). In this review, we have shown that asymmetric total
synthesis played a key role in elucidating the structures of these complex natural
products.
References
1. B€odeker K (1881) Lycopodin, das erste alkaloid der gef€afskryptogamen. Ligbigs Ann
208:363–367
2. Manske RHF (1955) The Lycopodium alkaloids. In: Manske RHF (ed) The alkaloids, vol 5.
Academic, New York, pp 295–300, Chapter 47
3. Manske RHF (1960) The Lycopodium alkaloids. In: Manske RHF (ed) The alkaloids.
Academic, New York, pp 505–507, Chapter 23
4. MacLean DB (1968) The Lycopodium alkaloids. In: Manske RHF (ed) The alkaloids, vol 10.
Academic, New York, pp 305–382, Chapter 4
5. MacLean DB (1973) The Lycopodium alkaloids. In: Manske RHF (ed) The alkaloids, vol 14.
Academic, New York, pp 348–405, Chapter 9
6. MacLean DB (1985) Lycopodium alkaloids. In: Brossi A (ed) The alkaloids, vol 26.
Academic, Orlando, pp 241–298, Chapter 5
7. Ayer WA, Trifonov LS (1994) Lycopodium alkaloids. In: Cordell GA, Brossi A (eds) The
alkaloids, vol 45. Academic, San Diego, pp 233–266, Chapter 3
28 M. Kitajima and H. Takayama
51. Nishikawa Y, Kitajima M, Kogure N, Takayama H (2009) A divergent approach for the total
syntheses of cernuane-type and quinolizidine-type Lycopodium alkaloids. Tetrahedron
65:1608–1617
52. Liu G, Cogan DA, Owens TD, Tang TP, Ellman JA (1999) Synthesis of enantiomerically
pure N-tert-butanesulfinyl imines (tert-butanesulfinimines) by the direct condensation of
tert-butanesulfinamide with aldehydes and ketones. J Org Chem 64:1278–1284
53. Sugiura M, Mori C, Kobayashi S (2006) Enantioselective transfer aminoallylation: synthesis
of optically active homoallylic primary amines. J Am Chem Soc 128:11038–11039
54. Nishikawa Y, Kitajima M, Takayama H (2008) First asymmetric total syntheses of cernuane-
type Lycopodium alkaloids, cernuine, and cermizine D. Org Lett 10:1987–1990
55. Ramharter J, Weinstabl H, Mulzer J (2010) Synthesis of the Lycopodium alkaloid
(+)-lycoflexine. J Am Chem Soc 132:14338–14339
56. De Lorbe JE, Lotz MD, Martin SF (2010) Concise total synthesis of ()-lycopladine A. Org
Lett 12:1576–1579
57. Yang Y-R, Lai Z-W, Shen L, Huang J-Z, Wu X-D, Yin J-L, Wei K (2010) Total synthesis of
(–)-8-deoxyserratinine via an efficient Helquist annulation and double N-alkylation reaction.
Org Lett 12:3430–3433
58. Canham SM, France DJ, Overman LE (2010) Total synthesis of (+)-sieboldine A. J Am Chem
Soc 132:7876–7877
59. Kozak JA, Dake GR (2008) Total synthesis of (+)-fawcettidine. Angew Chem Int Ed
47:4221–4223
60. Linghu X, Kennedy-Smith JJ, Toste FD (2007) Total synthesis of (+)-fawcettimine. Angew
Chem Int Ed 46:7671–7673
61. Tsukano C, Zhao L, Takemoto Y, Hirama M (2010) Concise total synthesis of ()-lycodine.
Eur J Org Chem 2010:4198–4200
62. Fischer DF, Sarpong R (2010) Total synthesis of (+)-complanadine A using an iridium-
catalyzed pyridine C-H functionalization. J Am Chem Soc 132:5926–5927
63. Yuan C, Chang C-T, Axelrod A, Siegel D (2010) Synthesis of (+)-complanadine A, an inducer
of neurotrophic factor excretion. J Am Chem Soc 132:5924–5925
64. Koshiba T, Yokoshima S, Fukuyama T (2009) Total synthesis of (–)-huperzine A. Org Lett
11:5354–5356
65. Yang H, Carter RG (2010) Development of an enantioselective route toward the Lycopodium
alkaloids: total synthesis of lycopodine. J Org Chem 75:4929–4938
66. Yang H, Carter RG, Zakharov LN (2008) Enantioselective total synthesis of lycopodine. J Am
Chem Soc 130:9238–9239
67. Liau BB, Shair MD (2010) Total synthesis of (+)-fastigiatine. J Am Chem Soc 132:9594–9595
68. Bisai V, Sarpong R (2010) Methoxypyridines in the synthesis of Lycopodium alkaloids: total
synthesis of ()-lycoposerramine R. Org Lett 12:2551–2553
69. Chandra A, Pigza JA, Han J, Mutnick D, Johnston JN (2009) Total synthesis of the Lycopo-
dium alkaloid (+)-serratezomine A. J Am Chem Soc 131:3470–3471
70. Nishimura T, Unni AK, Yokoshima S, Fukuyama T (2011) Concise total synthesis of (+)-
lyconadin A. J Am Chem Soc 133:418–419
71. Beshore DC, Smith AB III (2007) Total syntheses of (+)-lyconadin A and (–)-lyconadin B.
J Am Chem Soc 129:4148–4149
72. Bisai A, West SP, Sarpong R (2008) Unified strategy for the synthesis of the “miscellaneous”
Lycopodium alkaloids: total synthesis of ()-lyconadin A. J Am Chem Soc 130:7222–7223
73. Altman RA, Nilsson BL, Overman LE, Read de Alaniz J, Rohde JM, Taupin V (2010) Total
synthesis of (+)-nankakurines A and B and ()-5-epi-nankakurine A. J Org Chem 75:7519–7534
74. Nilsson BL, Overman LE, Read de Alaniz J, Rohde JM (2008) Enantioselective total
syntheses of nankakurines A and B: confirmation of structure and establishment of absolute
configuration. J Am Chem Soc 130:11297–11299
75. Cheng X, Waters SP (2010) Concise total syntheses of the Lycopodium alkaloids
()-nankakurines A and B via luciduline. Org Lett 12:205–207
Lycopodium Alkaloids: Isolation and Asymmetric Synthesis 31
Contents
1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
2 Early Syntheses of Morphine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
2.1 Gates (1952) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
2.2 Rice (1980) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
3 Recent Syntheses of Morphine and/or Codeine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
3.1 Fukuyama (2006) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
3.2 Hudlicky (2007) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
3.3 Iorga and Guillou (2008) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
3.4 Chida (2008) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
3.5 Hudlicky (2009) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
3.6 Magnus (2009) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
U. Rinner (*)
Institute of Organic Chemistry, University of Vienna, W€ahringer Straße 38, 1090 Vienna, Austria
e-mail: [email protected]
T. Hudlicky (*)
Department of Chemistry and Centre for Biotechnology, Brock University, 500 Glenridge Ave.,
St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada
e-mail: [email protected]
34 U. Rinner and T. Hudlicky
Abbreviations
2,4-DNPH 2,4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine
BHT Butylated hydroxytoluene
CSA Camphorsulfonic acid
DDQ Dichloro dicyano benzoquinone
DEAD Diethyl azodicarboxylate
DIAD Diisopropyl azodicarboxylate
DMAP 4-Dimethylaminopyridine
DNsCl 2,4-Dinitrobenzene-sulfonyl chloride
dpa Dibenzylidenacetone
dppf 1,10 -Bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene
dppp 1,3-Bis(diphenylphosphino)propane
EDCI 1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimetylaminopropyl)carbodiimide
IBX 2-Iodoxybenzoic acid
KHMDS Potassium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide
LiHMDS Lithium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide
MCPBA 3-Chloroperbenzoic acid
NaHMDS Sodium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide
NBS N-Bromosuccinimide
PAD Potassium azodicarboxylate
PPTS Pyridinium p-toluenesulfonate
TBAF tetra-n-Butylammonium fluoride
TCDI Imidazole 1,10 -thiocarbonyldiimidazole
TFA Trifluoroacetic acid
1 Introduction
Morphine (1) and its congeners, codeine (2), thebaine (3), and oripavine (4), Fig. 1,
as well as other minor constituents of the opium poppy latex, continue to garner
interest of the chemical community for a number of reasons. The focus on the total
synthesis of these alkaloids in the academic sector has not waned and now spans
almost 60 years since the seminal disclosure of the first synthesis by Gates in 1952
[1, 2].
Synthesis of Morphine Alkaloids and Derivatives 35
RO RO
1
A 3
B 12 10
O E D O 13 9
NMe 5 14 NMe
C
6
HO 8
MeO 7
morphine (1), R = H thebaine (3), R = Me
codeine (2), R = Me oripavine (4),R = H
AcO MeO HO
O O O
NMe NMe N
R OH
AcO O O
heroin (5) oxycodone (6), R = OH naltrexone (8)
hydrocodone (7), R = H
HO HO HO
O O O
N N N
OH OH
O MeO HO
buprenorphine (10)
Fig. 2 Opiate-derived agonists and antagonists for legal and illicit (i.e., heroin) use
The medical community requires a constant supply of morphine and other analge-
sic agents for pain control. The unnatural derivatives of morphine, whether agonists or
antagonists, are all derived by semisynthesis from the naturally occurring alkaloids
harvested primarily in Asia and Tasmania for legal consumption. The extent of illicit
use of morphine and other derivatives, such as heroin (5), Fig. 2, can only be estimated
but likely exceeds $800 billion annually. Some opiate-derived products, such as the
analgesics oxycodone (6) and hydrocodone (7), enjoy a widespread legal as well as
illicit use. The antagonists and mixed agonists, all derived by semisynthesis, include
naltrexone (8) for treatment of alcohol addiction [3], naloxone (9) for treatment of
opiate overdose [4], buprenorphine (10), and nalbuphine (11), Fig. 2.
Naltrexone is an opioid receptor antagonist used primarily in the management
of alcohol and/or opioid dependence. It is marketed in generic form as its
hydrochloride salt, naltrexone hydrochloride, and sold under the trade names
Revia™ and Depade™. Naltrexone and its active metabolite 6-b-naltrexol are
competitive antagonists at m- and k-opioid receptors, and to a lesser extent at
d-opioid receptors [5]. Naloxone is a drug used to counter the effects of opioid
36 U. Rinner and T. Hudlicky
1
http://www.incb.org/pdf/technical-reports/narcotic-drugs/2008/tables_of_reported_statistics.pdf.
2
The authors thank Dr. Phil Cox, Noramco, Inc. for providing the information in Tables 1 and 2.
Synthesis of Morphine Alkaloids and Derivatives 37
a –
b + +
– HO
HO
+ + – –
– – + +
+ + – –
–O + – –O – +
– – + + + –
+ + NMe – – NMe
– – + +
HO + HO –
3
Reprinted with permission from: Zezula J, Hudlicky T (2005) Synlett, 388–405. Copyright 2005
Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart, New York.
4
Hudlicky T, Reed, JW: the Way of Synthesis. Evolution of Design and Methods. Page 732.
Publication year 2007. Copyright Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. Reproduced with
permission.
38 U. Rinner and T. Hudlicky
pointed out on several occasions [18, 19]. Starting from either the phenolic oxygen (a)
or the tertiary amine (b), it is not possible to draw a polarization assignment in which
all electronegative atoms avoid an incorrect positive charge or in which alternating
charges match. Because of this fact almost any strategy applied to the construction of
morphine skeleton will, sooner or later, require major tactical maneuvers leading to an
increase in the step-count and hence a decrease in practicality.
These issues have been addressed in detail in many previous reviews [18, 21–26].
Since our update on morphine synthesis was published 5 years ago in Synlett [18],
several new approaches have appeared in the literature. This review summarizes the
recent accomplishments and also provides for an update in methods used to
approach some of the semisynthetic opiates.
The summary of accomplishments in the total synthesis of morphine alkaloids is
depicted in Table 3. Most authors target codeine as the ultimate synthetic target;
its attainment represents a formal total synthesis of morphine as Rice demonstrated
its conversion to morphine by O-demethylation with BBr3 [55]. Such a strategy has
a historical basis as, in the early days of structure elucidation, chemists found
it easier to perform degradation on codeine because it was air stable. Morphine
is more difficult to handle for several reasons. First, it has the properties of an
amino acid, and, second, it is easily oxidized by air (hence the dark color of raw
opium). Once it was established that morphine and codeine differ only by the
absence or presence of the O-methyl group, all subsequent work was carried out
with codeine.
Modern approaches no doubt subscribe to a similar strategy for the same reasons
and thus most published syntheses stop at the stage of codeine. The syntheses are
listed chronologically, with the yields “as reported.” It is impossible to validate the
claimed yields, especially overall yields, in cases where the reactions are performed
on very small scales. Claims of reaction product yields above 94% are clearly
erroneous in nature and should be viewed with suspicion. Similarly, the credibility
of overall yields above 2 or 3% is questionable, as explained in a recent treatise on
accuracy in reporting isolated product yields [56]. An exception to this statement
are the yields reported in the synthesis of Rice [16], which was performed on a
multigram scale.
HO HO O
1. PhCOCl, py 3. H2, Pd / C
A 2. NaNO2, AcOH 4. FeCl3
65 % N 88 % O
B
O
OH OBz OBz
12 13 14
SO2
50 %
Δ
18 20
19
1. dibenzoyl Br
MeO MeO MeO 1
tartaricacid
(resolution)
MeO 2 . H2SO4, H2O HO Br2, HOAc HO
3. N2H4, KOH 13
NMe 4. tBuOK, Ph CO 9 NMe NMe
2 14
H 36 % H H
O O
Br
20 21 22
2,4-DNPH 41 %
(2 steps)
O O ArNHN
25 24 23
1. Br2 (2 equiv.)
26 %
2. 2, 4-DNPH
MeO Br MeO Br HO
1. LiAlH4, THF
aq. HCl, acetone 2. py, HCl
O O O
27 % 22 %
5 NMe NMe NMe
ArNHN O HO
26 27 morphine (1)
by direct comparison with degradation products obtained from natural codeine, thus
confirming the structure of the morphinan skeleton as postulated by Robinson [57].
Furthermore, the remaining steps in the forward synthesis were facilitated by access to
larger amounts of material from natural sources. Regioselective hydration and selec-
tive monodemethylation with hydrazine and KOH in ethylene glycol were followed
by a modified Oppenauer oxidation and ketone 21 was obtained. a-Bromination
(along with bromination of the aromatic ring) afforded 22, which, upon reaction
with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (2,4-DNPH), gave 23 with concomitant epimeriza-
tion at C14 to the thermodynamically more favored natural configuration. Hydrolysis
of the hydrazone and hydration gave 25, which was brominated and treated
with 2,4-DNPH, resulting in the closure of the dihydrofuran ring (26). Hydrolysis of
the hydrazone delivered the a,b-unsaturated ketone 27, which was converted into
codeine via hydrogenation and reduction of the ketone and the aryl bromide. The use
of the unsaturated hydrazone for both epimerization and a-bromination of the C5
position was indeed ingenious and attests to the level of thought that Gates had given
to this protocol. Demethylation with hydrochloric acid in pyridine as described by
Rapoport [59] concluded the first total synthesis and the final structure proof of
morphine (1).
42 U. Rinner and T. Hudlicky
Rice achieved the shortest and the most efficient formal synthesis of morphine via
a biomimetic approach with a Grewe cyclization as the key step (Scheme 3).
Condensation of amine 28 and acid 29 is followed by a Bischler–Napieralski
reaction and sodium cyanoborohydride reduction to establish the C,D-ring of the
alkaloid (30). Birch reduction and subsequent N-formylation with phenyl formate
gave the methyl enol ether 31. Ketalization and bromination of the aromatic ring,
to protect the para position, afforded 32 as the precursor for the key electrophilic
cyclization reaction as described previously by Grewe [29]. This reaction
was achieved via treatment of 32 with formic acid to release the b,g-unsaturated
ketone and subsequent exposure to NH4F · HF in TfOH. Morphinan 33 was defor-
mylated and converted into 25 by reductive amination before the dihydrofuran
ring was established via bromination of the a-position of the ketone and deprotona-
tion of the phenol. The aryl bromide was removed by hydrogenation in the presence
MeO
MeO MeO
C 1. 200 °C, 2 h 1. Li, NH3,
NH2 2. POCl , MeCN D
3 NH THF, tBuOH NCHO
28 3. NaCNBH3, MeOH 2. PhOCHO, EtOAc, Δ
+ 85 %
82 %
COH2
A
MeO MeO
MeO
29 OH
OH OH
30 31
1. (CH2OH)2, THF,
MeSO3H
2. CH3CONHBr, 0 °C
O
MeO Br MeO Br
O C D
1. HCO2H, H2O A NCHO
HO 2. NH4F . HF, CF3SO3H HO Br
=
54 % from 31 D
NCHO NCHO
O C A
O MeO
O
33 32 OH
MeO Br MeO HO
1. Br2, HOAc
2. NaOH, CHCl3 5 steps
HO 3. H2, HOAc, HCHO see refs. 55, 60
O O
79 % 36 %
NMe NMe NMe
O O HO
25 dihydrocodeinone (34) morphine (1)
This section summarizes all syntheses of morphine and codeine published since the
last major review in this area was published in 2005 [18]. A general overview of the
key strategic elements in all syntheses discussed within this section is provided in
Schemes 4 and 5.
Fukuyama (2006)
Heck
MeO
HO MeO MeO OMe
OMe
OMe
OMe
O O O O I NHCO2Me
NMe NR NHCO2Me
HO O Mannich reaction O
OTBS
morphine (1)
Hudlicky (2007)
MeO MeO MeO MeO
Br
CHO
O O O O Br
NMe NMeBoc NMeBoc
H H NMeBoc
C
HO TBSO Heck TBSO TBSO
amino- C-ring prepared
ent-codeine mercuration
(ent-2) by biocatalysis
O O
O O
NMe NMeBn NMeBn O
NMe2 Michael
HO O
O addition
codeine (2) hydro- Claisen OH
amination rearrangement
Chida (2008)
Claisen rearrange- MeO
HO MeO MeO
Friedel- ment cascade
Crafts Suzuki
MeO MeO
O O CHO CO2Et
HO
NMe CO2Et
C
HO TBSO HO
morphine (1) C-ring sugar derived
via Ferrier rearrangement
Hudlicky (2009)
MeO MeO
Magnus (2009)
O O CHO
O O EtO
NMe NCO2Et NO2
EtO
Br Suzuki
HO SN2¢ o, p-phenol
codeine (2) Michael
oxidation O OTBS
Stork (2009)
OMe
CO2Me O
O O O O
NMe O OTES I O
Diels-
Alder MeO MeO
HO
codeine (2) O OMe
Fukuyama (2010)
MeO MeO
HO MeO OMe
OMe
OMe OMe
O O O O I NHCbz
NMe NMeDNs NMeDNs
OMs Heck
1, 6-addition O O Mitsunobu
HO
AcO
morphine (1) aldol
MeO
OTBS OMe
COOH 1. Na, NH3, EtOH, -78 °C CO2Me 1. DIBAL-H A
13 2. AcCl, MeOH; NaOMe
OH 2. NaOMe, MeOH OMe
3. NBS, H2O, DMSO 3. TBSCl, imidazole
C O O I
62 % 45 %
Br OTBS
39 40 41
C
OH
38
MeO MeO
OMe OMe
1. p-nitrobenzoic 1. LiBH4 A
acid,DEAD, Ph3P 2. TBSCl, imidazole
OMe 3. DIBAL-H OMe
2. CSA, MeOH
38 O O I NHCO2Me
3. DEAD, Ph3P I 4. NaBH4, MeOH
HO CN CN 5. ClCO2Me, K2CO3
C
73 % (from 38)
O OTBS
43
42
O Ar 1. [Pd2(dba)3],
P(o-tolyl)3,
87 %
NEt3,MeCN
2. TBAF
MeO MeO HO
1. Dess-Martin
2. LiAlH4, THF, BBr3,
reflux CH2Cl2
O O O
78 % 74 %
NR NMe NMe
HO HO HO
opening and formation of allylic alcohol 47. The synthesis of codeine (2) was
accomplished after inversion of the alcohol via the known oxidation/reduction
sequence [46, 60]. Morphine (1) was obtained after cleavage of the methyl ether
following a procedure published by Rice in 1977 [55].
n-Bu3P, DIAD,
THF, 48, 0 °C 55 %
MeO
MeO MeO
Br
PPh3CH2Br2, Pd(OAc)2, Ag2CO3, CHO
t-BuOK, THF, -60 °C CHO dppf, toluene, 110 °C
O O O Br
49 % 13 82 %
NMeBoc NMeBoc NMeBoc
44 % Pd(OAc)2, Ag2CO3,
dppp, toluene, 110 °C
the B-ring with concomitant shift of the double bond into the position present in the
natural product and final closure of the D-ring.
Whole cell oxidation of b-bromoethylbenzene with recombinant Escherichia
coli JM109 (pDTG601A) [63] afforded cyclohexadiene-cis-diol 49, which was
selectively reduced with potassium azodicarboxylate (PAD) before the hydroxy
functionalities were protected as acetate 50. The bis-acetate was reacted with
methylamine and the corresponding secondary amine was obtained with concom-
itant cleavage of the acetate functionalities. N-Boc-protection and silylation of
the distal hydroxy functionality resulted in allylic alcohol 51, which served
as coupling partner in a Mitsunobu reaction with phenol 48. Intramolecular
Heck cyclization of aryl bromide 52 afforded aldehyde 53 in excellent yield as
a single isomer. A Wittig reaction was then used to introduce a vinyl bromide
moiety and served to prepare the substrate for the second Heck cyclization
reaction to close the B-ring and simultaneously shift the double bond in the
position present in the natural product. The configuration of the C6 hydroxy
group in 55 was corrected via the known oxidation/reduction sequence [46, 60]
after the cleavage of the silyl ether and 56 was isolated. The closure of the
48 U. Rinner and T. Hudlicky
D-ring concluded the synthesis of ent-codeine. All attempts to repeat the hydro-
amination protocol published by Trost for the same synthetic intermediate
[47, 48] failed and a different strategy for this operation had to be devised.
The D-ring was established by removal of the Boc-protecting group followed
by aminomercuration of the benzylic double bond and intramolecular trapping
of the resulting organomercurial species by the ethylamino sidechain. The final
steps required the reduction (LiAlH4) of the organomercury compounds formed
during the aminomercuration protocol.
Two years after the publication of ent-codeine, Hudlicky also presented a route
towards codeine (natural series) employing the same enzymatically derived starting
material (49) [15]. The synthesis of the natural isomer is outlined in Sect. 3.5.
Iorga and Guillou presented a route to racemic codeine with a lactone opening/
Michael addition sequence and an Eschenmoser–Claisen rearrangement as key
steps (Scheme 9) [51]. Acid 58, accessible by Birch reduction of p-methoxyphe-
nylacetic acid and subsequent ketalization with ethylene glycol, was esterified with
2-iodo-6-methoxyphenol (57). Subsequent Heck cyclization of ester 59 delivered
spirocyclic lactone 60. Hydrolysis of the ketal and oxidation of the corresponding
a,b-unsaturated ketone delivered lactone 61, which was allowed to react with
N-methylbenzylamine, resulting in lactone opening and amide formation. Upon
reduction with LiAlH4 in refluxing THF, the amine 62 was obtained. During
the course of this reaction the deprotonated phenol acted as the nucleophile in
a Michael-type addition with concomitant formation of the E-ring. Thus, the
exocyclic two-carbon chain in 58 served a dual purpose: it was used as a convenient
tether for the intramolecular Heck cyclization of 59 and later provided the ethyla-
mino bridge to complete ring D of morphine.
The allylic alcohol was subjected to an Eschenmoser–Claisen rearrangement
with dimethylacetamide dimethylacetal to introduce the C14 substituent in a stereo-
selective manner. Reduction of the amide to the corresponding aldehyde with
phenyl silane in the presence of Ti(OiPr)4 was followed by an acid-promoted
closure of the C-ring of codeine. In order to prevent N-oxidation, the amine
was converted to the corresponding tosylamide, via debenzylation and treatment
with tosyl chloride, before the allylic alcohol was introduced by the reaction of
the alkene with selenium dioxide (65). The stereochemistry of the C6 hydroxy
functionality was corrected by applying the well-known oxidation/reduction
protocol [46, 60] before the benzylic double bond was reductively removed under
Birch conditions. Codeine (2) was obtained in 17 steps with an overall yield of
approximately 0.6%.
Synthesis of Morphine Alkaloids and Derivatives 49
MeO
MeO
A
HO MeO
57 O [Pd2(dba)3], NEt3,
I EDCl, DMAP DMF, 140 °C
+ I O
HO2C 80 % O
O O
C O
O O 60
O O 58 59
1. Ph3CBF4
2. (PhSeO)2O, 60 %
Na2CO3, 60 °C
HO 6 HO
64 65
codeine (2)
OTf O 1. Hg(OCOCF3)2,
13
L-Selectride, -78 °C; PMBO acetone, buffer PMBO
PMBO
Comins’ reagent 2. MsCl, NEt3, DMAP O
5 C
89 % 91 %
TBSO 6 TBSO TBSO OMe
71 70 69
MeO
A
1. MeNH2, MeNH3Cl,
MS 3A, 0 °C; then LiBH
86 % 2. TsCl, DMAP, py, 80 °C 4
3. Bu4NF, THF
MeO MeO HO
Li, tBuOH,
NH3,THF, -78 °C ref. 38
O O O
92 %
NMe NMe NMe
Ts
HO HO 6 HO
78 dihydroisocodeine (79) morphine (1)
Two years after the synthesis of ent-codeine [50], Hudlicky published a route to the
natural enantiomer of the alkaloid [15]. With biocatalytically-derived cyclohexa-
diene-cis-diol 49 (Scheme 8), the same starting material in the synthesis of the
enantiomer of the natural product was utilized. The strategic difference between the
two syntheses is based on the preparation of epoxide 82 obtained via a Mitsunobu
inversion/elimination protocol of the diol 80 (Scheme 12).
The cyclohexadiene-cis-diol 49, derived enzymatically from b-bromoethylben-
zene, was converted into Boc-protected amine 80 as described previously and
52 U. Rinner and T. Hudlicky
MeO
MeO
Ar
B
O O MeO MeO
B B ethyl vinyl ether,
MeO Ar O Ar
HO CHO Br2, iPr2NEt, 0 °C O
85 CHO
A EtO
[Pd2(dba)3], PCy3, 99 %
HO CHO BHT, K2CO3, 80 °C
Br dioxane, H2O,
Br
99 %
OTBS OTBS
48 86 87
CsF, DMF, 96 %
Ar = C OTBS 130 °C
O O O
narwedine (90) 89 88
O OH
91 92 93
1. 96
91 %
2. KOH
1. HO(CH2)3OH, MeO
pTSA MeO
2. methyl propiolate, Pd(OAc)2, Ph3P, NaOAc,
MeO O
NEt3, THF O nBu4NCl, DMF, 125 °C O
A
72 % I O 84 % O E
HO 13 13 O
I O CO2Me
O OMe 99
97 98
1. HCl, THF
OMe 2. Ph3PCH2OCH3Cl, 93 %
105 KHMDS
MeO MeO
OTES MeO
1. ZrCp2(H)Cl, 105
2. TESCl, imidazole
O CO2Me = O 95 % O
O
14 OTES CO2Me
6 CO2Me
MeO OMe
101 101 100
decalin, NEt ,
69 % 240 °C, 24 h 3
The closure of the D-ring succeeded under basic conditions via an SN2 displace-
ment of the mesylate by the secondary amine (Scheme 16). Morphinan 106 was
then successfully converted into thebaine (3) via manganese dioxide mediated
oxidation following a procedure by Rapoport [67].
Direct cleavage of the allylic methyl ether in 106 with boron tribromide afforded
codeine in only minor amounts. Better yields were obtained when 106 was con-
verted to the corresponding carbamate before a selenium dioxide mediated oxida-
tion delivered ketone 107. Stereoselective reduction of the ketone and concomitant
generation of the N-methyl group concluded the synthesis of codeine [60, 68]. This
synthesis reported by Stork and co-workers provided a closure to several years of
research, some of which has been reported in Ph.D. dissertations [69].
In 2006, Fukuyama reported his first synthesis of morphine [49], followed 4 years
later by an improved route [54]. As shown in Scheme 17, cyclohexenone (108) was
56 U. Rinner and T. Hudlicky
MeO MeO
LiAlH4
O O
82 %
NCO2Me NMe
O HO
1. Pb(OAc)4, 1. TBSOTf,
toluene,rf I lipase AK, I 2, 6-lutidine I
2. I2, DMAP, O 13 THF, phosphate O 2. NaBH4,
O HO
py, CCl4 buffer (pH 7.41) CeCl3, MeOH
C
70 %
AcO HO TBSO
108 109 110 111
[PdCl2(dppf)], 119
aq. NaOH, THF 84 %
MeO
MeO OMe
OMe [Pd2(dba)3], A NHCbz
P(o-tolyl)3,NEt3, n-Bu3P,DEAD
OMe HO
OMe MeCN, rf THF, 37
O O I
97 % 13 NHCbz 99%
NHCbz TBSO
5
C
TBSO
114 TBSO 113 112
1. LiAlH4, THF, rf
2. aq. NaOH, DNsCl
60 %
3. CSA, MeOH
4. Dess-Martin
MeO 1. aq. TFA, MeO MeO
OMe toluene, 50 °C
2. MsCl, HSCH2CO2H,
OMe iPr2NEt, 0 °C i Pr2NEt, 0 °C
O O O
14 71 %
NMeDNs 14 NMeDNs NMe
OMs
O O O
115 11 6 neopinone (8,14-dehydro; 117)
codeinone (7,8-dehydro; 118)
B 1. HCl, dioxane,
NHCbz 73 %
CH2Cl2
from 116
2. NaBH4, MeOH
HO MeO
119
BBr3,
MeO CH2Cl2
OMe O O
A 63 %
HO NMe NMe
OMe
I HO HO
37
for preparation see Scheme 6 morphine (1) codeine (2)
reduction to yield codeine. Morphine was obtained by reaction with boron tribro-
mide following the procedure first reported by Rice [55].
Fukuyama also presented an alternative route to the advanced intermediate 114
as shown in Scheme 18 with an early introduction of the protected amino function-
ality. Reaction of g-butyrolactone with the Grignard reagent derived from 1,4-
dibromobutane (120) afforded diol 121. Mesylation of the primary hydroxyl func-
tionality with concomitant elimination of the tertiary one was followed by reaction
with methylamine and protection of the resulting secondary amine to give alkene
122. Ozonolysis of the double bond in 122 and subsequent intramolecular aldol
condensation of the resulting ketoaldehyde afforded cycohexenone 123. Rubottom
oxidation and acetylation gave 124, which served as substrate in the lipase-
58 U. Rinner and T. Hudlicky
1. MsCl, NEt3
OH 2. MeNH2, MeOH, rf
Br Mg, THF, rf 3. DNsCl, aq. NaHCO3 DNs
Br HO N
61 %
O Me
120 121 122
O
79 % 1. O3, toluene;
Ph3P
2. aq. TFA
1. lipase AK,
NMeDNs THF, buffer NMeDNs 1.TMSOTf, NEt3; NMeDNs
2. TBSOTf, MCPBA
O O O
2,6-lutidine 2. Ac2O, py
5
C
42 % 89 %
TBSO AcO 6
125 124 123
NaBH4, THF
97 %
CeCl3.7H2O
Scheme 18 Fukuyama’s synthesis of codeine and morphine – alternative route to intermediate 114
O 2 steps
O O O
NMeAc NMeAc NMe
H
O O O
127 128 ent-codeinone
(ent-116)
9 steps from diol 49
2 steps form 53
RO RO
C14-oxidation
O O
14 NMe 14 NMe
OH
MeO O
oxycodone (6), R = Me
thebaine (3), R = Me oxymorphone (129), R = H
oripavine (4), R = H
1. N-demethylation
2. alkylation
HO
HO HO HO
O O N O
N N N
OH OH MeO OH
O O HO
HO
MeO
O
N+ Me
O–
O
O
N Ac
O
(132)
Eight total syntheses of morphine or congeners have been reported in the last
5 years, attesting to no shortage of new ideas or strategies. The interest in this
fascinating molecule will no doubt continue, yet a truly practical synthesis of the
title alkaloid still remains a distant dream. In order even to approach the current
price per kilogram, a synthesis would have to be five to six steps long starting with
commodity chemicals. A potential for a practical synthesis may exist in the realm of
fermentation provided the biosynthetic pathway could be coded into a single
plasmid and used to over-express the required enzymes in a robust bacterial carrier.
A proof of principle has been attained through the work of Kutchan with the cloning
and expression of codeinone reductase in E. coli [101].
Another possibility for practical synthesis could come from the combination of
fermentation for attaining specific steps with semisynthesis to complete the prepa-
ration. Currently, we are fully dependent on natural sources of morphine and
all medicinally useful derivatives are made by semisynthesis. Perhaps more impor-
tant goals for the future generations of chemists would be to focus on the de novo
total synthesis of the derivatives themselves rather than morphine or codeine.
Perhaps we will see some effort devoted to this most worthwhile task in the near
future.
Addition
After the manuscript has been accepted for publication, a synthesis of codeine
was published featuring a Claisen-rearrangement and a 1,3-dipoloar nitrone cyclo-
addition as key steps: Erhard T, Ehrlich G, Metz, P (2011) A Total Synthesis of
(þ/)-codeine by 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition. Angew Chem Int Ed doi: 10.1002/
anie.201007448.
Acknowledgments The authors are grateful to the following agencies for financial support:
Hudlicky group: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC; Idea
to Innovation and Discovery Grants), Canada Research Chair Program, Canada Foundation for
Innovation (CFI), Research Corporation, Noramco, Inc., TDC Research, Inc., TDC Research
Foundation, and Brock University. In addition, the authors are most grateful to the co-workers
who participated in the various projects connected with the topic of this review between 2005 and
present; their names appear in the cited references. Rinner group: The Austrian Science Fund
(Fonds zur Förderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung, FWF) is gratefully acknowledged for
financial support.
62 U. Rinner and T. Hudlicky
References
25. Waldmann H (1995) Synthesis of calicheamicin. In: Waldmann H (ed) Organic synthesis
highlights II. VCH, Weinheim
26. Maier M (1995) Syntheses of morphine. In: Waldmann H (ed) Organic synthesis highlights
II. VCH, Weinheim
27. Elad D, Ginsburg D (1954) Syntheses in the morphine series 6. The synthesis of morphine.
J Chem Soc 3052–3056
28. Elad D, Ginsburg D (1954) The synthesis of morphine. J Am Chem Soc 76:312–313
29. Grewe R, Friedriccsen W (1967) Die cyclisierung von octahydro-isochinolinderivaten durch
morphinan-ringschluss. Synthese Der Dihydrothebainons. Chem Ber Recl 100:1550
30. Grewe R, Fischer H, Friedric W (1967) Die Partielle Birch-Reduktion Von 1-Benzyl-
Isochinolin-Derivaten. Chem Ber Recl 100:1
31. Evans DA, Mitch CH (1982) Studies directed towards the total synthesis of morphine
alkaloids. Tetrahedron Lett 23:285–288
32. White JD, Caravatti G, Kline TB, Edstrom E, Rice KC, Brossi A (1983) Biomimetic total
synthesis of ()-codeine. Tetrahedron 39:2393–2397
33. Moos WH, Gless RD, Rapoport H (1983) Codeine analogs – synthesis of 4a-aryldecahy-
droisoquinolines containing nitrogen ring functionality and of octahydro-1 h-indeno[1,2,3-
ef]isoquinolines – a total synthesis of codeine. J Org Chem 48:227–238
34. Toth JE, Fuchs PL (1987) Syntheses via vinyl sulfones. 21. Total synthesis of dl-morphine.
J Org Chem 52:473–475
35. Toth JE, Hamann PR, Fuchs PL (1988) Synthesis via vinyl sulfones. 29. Studies culminating
in the total synthesis of (dl)-morphine. J Org Chem 53:4694–4708
36. Tius MA, Kerr MA (1992) A novel-approach to the synthesis of morphine alkaloids – the
synthesis of (D, L)-thebainone-A. J Am Chem Soc 114:5959–5966
37. Parker KA, Fokas D (1992) Convergent synthesis of (þ/)-dihydroisocodeine in 11 steps by
the tandem radical cyclization strategy – a formal total synthesis of (þ/)-morphine. J Am
Chem Soc 114:9688–9689
38. Parker KA, Fokas D (2006) Enantioselective synthesis of ()-dihydrocodeinone: a short
formal synthesis of ()-morphine. J Org Chem 71:449–455
39. Hong CY, Kado N, Overman LE (1993) Asymmetric-synthesis of either enantiomer
of opium-alkaloids and morphinans – total synthesis of ()-dihydrocodeinone and (þ)-
dihydrocodeinone and ()-morphine and (þ)-morphine. J Am Chem Soc 115:11028–11029
40. Mulzer J, Durner G, Trauner D (1996) Formal total synthesis of ()-morphine by cuprate
conjugate addition. Angew Chem Int Ed 35:2830–2832
41. Parsons PJ, Penkett CS, Shell AJ (1996) Tandem reactions in organic synthesis: novel
strategies for natural product elaboration and the development of new synthetic methodology.
Chem Rev 96:195–206
42. White JD, Hrnciar P, Stappenbeck F (1997) Asymmetric synthesis of (þ)-morphine. The
phenanthrene route revisited. J Org Chem 62:5250–5251
43. Mulzer J, Bats JW, List B, Opatz T, Trauner D (1997) The phenanthrenone approach to opium
alkaloids: formal total synthesis of morphine by sigmatropic rearrangement. Synlett 441–444
44. Nagata H, Miyazawa N, Ogasawara K (2001) A concise route to ()-morphine. Chem
Commun 1094–1095
45. Nagata H, Miyazawa N, Ogasawara K (2001) Tandem single-step construction of chiral
hexahydrophenanthrenes: a concise route to (þ)-ferruginol. Org Lett 3:1737–1740
46. Taber DF, Neubert TD, Rheingold AL (2002) Synthesis of ()-morphine. J Am Chem Soc
124:12416–12417
47. Trost BM, Tang WP (2002) Enantioselective synthesis of ()-codeine and ()-morphine.
J Am Chem Soc 124:14542–14543
48. Trost BM, Tang WP, Toste FD (2005) Divergent enantioselective synthesis of ()-galantha-
mine and ()-morphine. J Am Chem Soc 127:14785–14803
49. Uchida K, Yokoshima S, Kan T, Fukuyama T (2006) Total synthesis of (þ/)-morphine.
Org Lett 8:5311–5313
64 U. Rinner and T. Hudlicky
50. Omori AT, Finn KJ, Leisch H, Carroll RJ, Hudlicky T (2007) Chemoenzymatic total
synthesis of (þ)-codeine by sequential intramolecular Heck cyclizations via C-B-D ring
construction. Synlett 2859–2862
51. Varin M, Barre E, Iorga B, Guillou C (2008) Diastereoselective total synthesis of
(þ/)-codeine. Chem Eur J 14:6606–6608
52. Tanimoto H, Saito R, Chida N (2008) Formal synthesis of ()-morphine from D-glucal
based on the cascade Claisen rearrangement. Tetrahedron Lett 49:358–362
53. Stork G, Yamashita A, Adams J, Schulte GR, Chesworth R, Miyazaki Y, Farmer JJ (2009)
Regiospecific and stereoselective syntheses of (þ/) morphine, codeine, and thebaine via
a highly stereocontrolled intramolecular 4þ2 cycloaddition leading to a phenanthrofuran
system. J Am Chem Soc 131:11402–11406
54. Koizumi H, Yokoshima S, Fukuyama T (2010) Total synthesis of ()-morphine. Chem
Asian J 5:2192–2198
55. Rice KC (1977) Rapid, high-yield conversion of codeine to morphine. J Med Chem 20:
164–165
56. Wernerova M, Hudlicky T (2010) On the practical limits of determining isolated product
yields and ratios of stereoisomers: reflections, analysis, and redemption. Synlett 2701–2707
57. Gulland JM, Robinson R (1925) Mem Proc Manchester Lit Phil Soc 69:79
58. Gates M (1950) The synthesis of ring systems related to morphine. 3. 5,6-Dimethoxy-
4-cyanomethyl-1,2-naphthoquinone and its condensation with dienes. J Am Chem Soc 72:
228–234
59. Rapoport H, Lovell CH, Tolbert BM (1951) The preparation of morphine-N-methyl-C-14.
J Am Chem Soc 73:5900
60. Iijima I, Rice KC, Silverton JV (1977) Studies in (þ)-morphinan series. 1. Alternate
conversion of (þ)-dihydrocodeinone into (þ)-codeine. Heterocycles 6:1157–1165
61. Uchida K, Yokoshima S, Kan T, Fukuyama T (2009) Total synthesis of (þ/)-morphine.
Heterocycles 77:1219–1234
62. Kaburagi Y, Tokuyama H, Fukuyama T (2004) Total synthesis of ()-strychnine. J Am
Chem Soc 126:10246–10247
63. Zylstra GJ, Gibson DT (1989) Toluene degradation by pseudomonas-putida f1 – nucleotide-
sequence of the Todc1c2bade genes and their expression in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem
264:14940–14946
64. Tanimoto H, Kato T, Chida N (2007) Total synthesis of (þ)-galanthamine starting from
D-glucose. Tetrahedron Lett 48:6267–6270
65. Bolitt V, Mioskowski C, Lee SG, Falck JR (1990) Direct preparation of 2-deoxy-D-gluco-
pyranosides from glucals without Ferrier rearrangement. J Org Chem 55:5812–5813
66. Shieh WC, Carlson JA (1994) Asymmetric transformation of either enantiomer of narwedine
via total spontaneous resolution process, a concise solution to the synthesis of ()-galantha-
mine. J Org Chem 59:5463–5465
67. Barber RB, Rapoport H (1975) Synthesis of thebaine and oripavine from codeine and
morphine. J Med Chem 18:1074–1077
68. Schwartz MA, Pham PTK (1988) Oxidative coupling of cis-3, N-bis(methoxycarbonyl)-
N-norreticuline – an approach to the asymmetric-synthesis of morphine alkaloids. J Org
Chem 53:2318–2322
69. Wu C (1991) Intramolecular Diels–Alder cyclizations in an approach to the morphine
skeleton. Diss Abstr Int B 53:2044
70. Hudlicky T, Duchek J, Piercy TG (2011) Can J Chem, in press
71. Piercy TG, Duchek J, Ilceski D, Hudlicky T (2010) Diverse approaches to chemoenzymatic
synthesis of (þ)-codeine. 93rd Canadian Chemistry Conference, Toronto, May 29 – June 2
72. Berenyi S, Csutoras C, Sipos A (2009) Recent developments in the chemistry of thebaine and
its transformation products as pharmacological targets. Curr Med Chem 16:3215–3242
73. Thavaneswaran S, McCamley K, Scammells PJ (2006) N-Demethylation of alkaloids. Nat
Prod Commun 1:885–897
Synthesis of Morphine Alkaloids and Derivatives 65
74. McCawley EL, Hart ER, Marsh DF (1941) The preparation of N-allylmorphine. J Am Chem
Soc 63:314
75. Lewenstein MJ (1964) Br. Patent 955493
76. Blumberg H, Pachter IJ, Matossian Z (1967) U.S. Patent 3332950
77. Bentley KW (1968) Br. Patent 1136214
78. Lopez D, Quinoa E, Riguera R (1994) Photooxidation of thebaine – a route to 14-hydroxy-
morphinones and hydrodibenzofuran analogs of methadone. Tetrahedron Lett 35:5727–5730
79. Lopez D, Quinoa E, Riguera R (2000) The [4þ2] addition of singlet oxygen to thebaine:
new access to highly functionalized morphine derivatives via opioid endoperoxides. J Org
Chem 65:4671–4678
80. Krassnig R, Hederer C, Schmidhammer H (1996) Optimization of the synthesis of oxyco-
done and 5-methyloxycodone. Arch Pharm 329:325–326
81. Gindelberger DE (2010) Ruthenium catalysts for the production of hydrocodone, hydro-
morphone or a derivative thereof: PCT Int. Appl. 32 pp. CODEN: PIXXD2 WO 2010118273
A1 20101014 CAN 153:530729 AN 2010:1283630
82. Wang PX, Moser FW, Cantrell GL, Magparangalan DP, Bao J (2006) Method for the
catalytic production of hydrocodone, hydromorphone, and derivatives thereof: U.S. Pat.
Appl. Publ. 9 pp, Cont.-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 973,031. CODEN: USXXCO US
2006155130 A1 20060713 CAN 145:124776 AN 2006:681645
83. Wang PX, White CR (2005) Process for the catalytic conversion of codeine and morphine
into hydrocodone and hydromorphone: U.S. Pat. Appl. Publ. 8 pp., Cont.-in-part of U.S. Ser.
No. 495,503. CODEN: USXXCO US 2005124811 A1 20050609 CAN 143:26767 AN 2005:
497544
84. Leisch H, Carroll RJ, Hudlicky T, Cox DP (2007) Studies on regioselective hydrogenation of
thebaine and its conversion to hydrocodone. Tetrahedron Lett 48:3979–3981
85. Kotick MP, Leland DL, Polazzi JO, Schut RN (1980) Analgesic narcotic-antagonists.
1. 8-beta-Alkyl, 8-beta-acyl, and 8-beta (tertiary alcohol) dihydrocodeinones and dihydro-
morphinones. J Med Chem 23:166–174
86. Yu H, Prisinzano T, Dersch CM, Marcus J, Rothman RB, Jacobson AE, Rice KC (2002)
Synthesis and biological activity of 8 beta-substituted hydrocodone indole and hydromor-
phone indole derivatives. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 12:165–168
87. Cooley JH, Evain EJ (1989) Amine dealkylations with acyl chlorides. Synthesis-Stuttgart
1–7
88. Hobson JD, McCluske JG (1967) Cleavage of tertiary boses with phenyl chloroformate –
reconversion of 21-deoxyajmaline into ajmaline. J Chem Soc C 2015–2017
89. Rice KC (1975) Improved procedure for N-demethylation of 6,7-benzomorphans, morphine,
and codeine. J Org Chem 40:1850–1851
90. Greiner E, Spetea M, Krassnig R, Schullner F, Aceto M, Harris LS, Traynor JR, Woods JH,
Coop A, Schmidhammer H (2003) Synthesis and biological evaluation of 14-alkoxymorphinans.
18. N-Substituted 14-phenylpropyloxymorphinan-6-ones with unanticipated agonist properties:
extending the scope of common structure-activity relationships. J Med Chem 46:1758–1763
91. Hamilton GL, Backes BJ (2006) Dealkylative functionalization of tertiary amines with
electron deficient heteroaryl chlorides. Tetrahedron Lett 47:2229–2231
92. Ripper JA, Tiekink ERT, Scammells PJ (2001) Photochemical N-demethylation of alkaloids.
Bioorg Med Chem Lett 11:443–445
93. Carroll RJ, Leisch H, Scocchera E, Hudlicky T, Cox DP (2008) Palladium-catalyzed
N-demethylation/N-acylation of some morphine and tropane alkaloids. Adv Synth Catal
350:2984–2992
94. Carroll RJ, Leisch H, Hudlicky T (2009) Conversion of thebaine to morphine derivatives:
U.S. Pat. Appl. Publ. 9 pp. Chemical Indexing Equivalent to 150:77839 (WO). CODEN:
USXXCO US 2009005563 A1 20090101 CAN 150:77838 AN 2009:1904, US patent #
7,928,234
66 U. Rinner and T. Hudlicky
95. McCamley K, Ripper JA, Singer RD, Scammells PJ (2003) Efficient N-demethylation of opiate
alkaloids using a modified nonclassical Polonovski reaction. J Org Chem 68:9847–9850
96. Kok GB, Pye CC, Singer RD, Scammells PJ (2010) Two-step iron(0)-mediated
N-demethylation of N-methyl alkaloids. J Org Chem 75:4806–4811
97. Kok G, Ashton TD, Scammells PJ (2009) An improved process for the N-demethylation of
opiate alkaloids using an iron(II) catalyst in acetate buffer. Adv Synth Catal 351:283–286
98. Kok GB, Scammells PJ (2010) N-Demethylation of N-methyl alkaloids with ferrocene.
Bioorg Med Chem Lett 20:4499–4502
99. Chaudhary V, Leisch H, Moudra A, Allen B, De Luca V, Cox DP, Hudlicky T (2009)
Biotransformations of morphine alkaloids by fungi: N-demethylations, oxidations, and
reductions. Collect Czech Chem Commun 74:1179–1193
100. Hailes AM, French CE, Bruce NC (1994) Morphinone reductase for the preparation of
hydromorphone and hydrocodone: PCT Int. Appl. 23 pp. CODEN: PIXXD2 WO 9400565
A1 19940106 CAN 120:128514 AN 1994:128514
101. Unterlinner B, Lenz R, Kutchan TM (1999) Molecular cloning and functional expression of
codeinone reductase: the penultimate enzyme in morphine biosynthesis in the opium poppy
Papaver somniferum. Plant J 18:465–475
Top Curr Chem (2012) 309: 67–130
DOI: 10.1007/128_2011_204
# Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011
Published online: 14 September 2011
Abstract Important biologically active indole alkaloids are decorated with prenyl
(3,3-dimethylallyl) and tert-prenyl (1,1-dimethylallyl) groups. Covering the litera-
ture until the end of 2010, this review article comprehensively summarises and
discusses the currently available technologies of prenylation and tert-prenylation
of indoles, which have been applied in natural products total syntheses or could
be applied there in the near future. We focus on those procedures which
introduce the C5 units in one step, organised according to the indole position to
be functionalised. Key strategies include electrophilic and nucleophilic prenylation
and tert-prenylation, prenyl and tert-prenyl rearrangements, transition metal-
mediated reactions and enzymatic methods.
Contents
1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
2 N-Prenylation and N-tert-Prenylation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
2.1 N-Prenylation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
2.2 N-tert-Prenylation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
3 Prenylation and tert-Prenylation at C2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
3.1 Prenylation at C2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
3.2 tert-Prenylation at C2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
4 Prenylation and tert-Prenylation at C3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
4.1 Prenylation at C3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
4.2 tert-Prenylation at C3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
5 Prenylation and tert-Prenylation in the Benzene Section of Indole . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114
5.1 4- and 5-Prenylindoles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114
1 Introduction
chemoenzymatic
electrophilic prenylation after 2-
Ni- or Pd-mediated lithiation of N-protected indoles
Pictet-Spengler condensation
4
3
Ni- or Pd- 5 chemoenzymatic
mediated 2 acid-catalyzed prenyl shift from N1
6 N 1
H acid-catalyzed prenyl shift from C3
Ni-mediated 7 of pyrrolo[2,3-b]indolines
Claisen rearrangement of 6-
tert-prenyloxyindole electrophilic prenylation after N-
deprotonation, if C3 substituted
aza-Claisen rearrangement of
N-tert-prenylindole chemoenzymatic
chemoenzymatic
4
3 nucleophilic attack of prenylborane
not established 5 at 3-chloroindolenine and -indole
2
Claisen rearrangement of 3-
6 N1 prenyloxy- or -thioindole
not established H
7
metal-catalysed substitution
Claisen propargylation of indoline
rearrangement of 6-
prenyloxyindole chemoenzymatic
2.1 N-Prenylation
bromide or chloride. Yields normally reach more than 80%. Alkali hydroxides in the
presence of crown ethers, phase transfer catalysts [8, 20–23] or K2CO3 [24, 25] have
also been used as bases, if electron withdrawing groups (Ac, CHO) were present at C3.
N-Unsubstituted diketopiperazines and phthalimide-protected tryptophan derivatives
underwent partial epimerisation when working with NaH/DMF. As an alternative, it
was possible to N-prenylate unprotected tryptophan selectively by treatment with
prenyl bromide/Na in liquid ammonia via the disodium salt of tryptophan [16, 26].
N-Prenylation of 3-alkylindole can be combined in situ with Vilsmeier formylation of
the 2-position [27]. However, if the indole is not deprotonated prior to prenylation, e.g.
by working in slightly acidic buffer systems instead of using NaH/DMF, other
positions than the indole nitrogen are prenylated (see below).
Electrophilic N-prenylation of indole has, for instance, been employed in the synthe-
sis of N-prenylindolactam-V (3, Scheme 1) [18], where the yield is only moderate,
probably due to the simultaneous presence of the amide moiety. The natural product
()-indolactam V (1) is a potent inhibitor of protein kinase C isozymes [28]. Other
examples include the total syntheses of deformylflustrabromine B [11], of derivatives of
physostigmine and debromoflustramine B [22], or of vulcanine and borrerine [24]. The
key step of the synthesis of N-prenyltryprostatin B features N-prenylation with concom-
itant 3-prenylation (see Sect. 3.1) [29]. As a side reaction, prenylation of diketopi-
perazines, a frequent structural motif in prenylated indole alkaloids, was observed.
There are only a few cases in which the standard procedure did not work. One of
them concerns the behaviour of pyrroloindole 4 on treatment with NaH and then
prenyl bromide (Scheme 2). Prabhakar, Lobo and co-workers obtained mostly the
3-prenylated products 5 (30%) and 6 (28%) with minor amounts of 7 (10%)
[30, 31]. Perhaps in this special case Na+ is chelated by the deprotonated indole
nitrogen and the oxygen of the acetyl side chain, forming a six-membered ring,
thereby shielding N1 and paving the way for C3a to attack at prenylbromide.
As the other important exception to the applicability of the standard procedure,
N-prenylation is only the minor reaction if an alkylmercapto group is located at C2.
Via S-prenylation, a thia-Claisen rearrangement to the 3-position becomes the
major reaction, affording 3-tert-prenylindoles [4, 32], as exploited in the total
synthesis of amauromine [33–35] (see Chap. 4.2).
Chemoenzymatic synthesis. The synthesis of the Aspergillus fumigatus myco-
toxin fumitremorgin B (10) from 12,13-dihydroxyfumitremorgin C (9) is one of the
early, still recent, applications of enzyme-catalysed N-prenylation (Scheme 3).
H
H 1) Ac2O, pyridine N
N N
OH
N 2) i) NaH, THF, 0°C, 30min) O
OH
O
ii)
2 N
N Br
H
iii) 2 N KOH, rt, 3 h
36%
1:(−)-indolactam-V 3
HO HO O 8 HO HO O
O O
N OP2O6(NH4)3 N
N N N
N prenyl transferase FtmzPT2
H O O
R3
R1 R2
Cl Na, allylic alcohol,
THF, rt, 18 h O
N
N N
N
11 12
O
R1 R2
O
THF, rf, 2.5 h R 3 N
10b
+
N
N R2 R1
N
R3
13 14
R1 R2 R3 13 14
H H H 89% 0%
H H Me 40% 16%
H Me Me 0% 88%
Me H H 83% 0%
O O O
PhMe, rf,
4 d, 93%
N N N
N N N
15 16 17
15, which is N-methylated at the indole instead of the quinoline moiety. Allylation
of the benzene section of the indole system was observed only as a very minor
reaction. By calculation, Westwood was able to confirm that when starting from 12
the barrier of the initial Claisen rearrangement is about 18 kJ/mol higher than that of
the subsequent aza-Claisen rearrangement, making it impossible to stop at the 10b-
allylated intermediate. In the case of 15, the second barrier is about 7 kJ/mol higher
than the first.
Indole Prenylation in Alkaloid Synthesis 73
2.2 N-tert-Prenylation
O 8, CdpNPT (0.0016 O
OH equiv.), Tris-HCl (50 OH
mM, pH 7.5), CaCl2 (10
NH2 mM), water, 37 °C, 16 h NH2
N 38% N
H
18 19
O 21 O
OMe OMe
Pd(OAc) 2 (0.1 equiv.),
NHX AgOCOCF3 (2 equiv.), NHX
Cu(OAc)2 (2 equiv.),
N air, MeCN, 35 °C, 24 h N
H 61%
20 22
X = Fmoc
(i) DDQ
X = Boc NaBH3CN, HOAc (ii) H2 , Pd-C,
quinoline
O O
OAc
OMe 24 OMe
NHBoc NHBoc
CuCl, iPr NEt,
N 2 N
THF, rf
H
70%
23 25
O O
Br
HO 27 HO
NH NH
N N
N H CuCl, iPr2NEt, N H
H O rt, 4 d O
NH 70% NH
26 28
O
HO NH
H2, Lindlar,
N
MeOH-pyridine (99:1)
29: okaramine C
N H
95% O
NH
approach has also been used in the Corey synthesis of okaramine N (see Sect. 3.2)
[51] and in the Ganesan synthesis of okaramine J (see Sect. 5.2) [52].
Except for 3-bromoindole, it is necessary to proceed via the indoline, because
treatment of indole with 1,1-dimethylpropargyl chloride (31) in the presence of
base leads to product mixtures resulting from reaction of in situ formed dimethyl-
vinylidene carbene. Sheu and co-workers isolated the three products 32, 33 and 34
on reaction of indole-3-carbaldehyde (30) (Scheme 7) [53]. In the main reaction,
indole C3 attacks at dimethylvinylidene carbene forming a vinyl anion, which
is protonated to give the 3-allenylindolenine. Hydroxide then attacks the carbal-
dehyde moiety with loss of formic acid and formation of a 3-allenylindole. Addition
of a second equivalent of indole-3-carbaldehyde (30) affords 32 and 33.
After treatment of Boc-protected tryptophan methyl ester (20) with 1,1-
dimethylpropargyl chloride (31) / NaH in DMF, we isolated the five products 35,
36, 37, 38 and 39 (Scheme 8) [54]. Both the indole nitrogen and C3 had reacted as
nucleophiles towards C1 and C3 of the intermediate dimethylvinylidene carbene,
followed by cyclisation to the pyrrolo[2,3-b]indoles. Earlier, Hino and co-workers
had obtained a similar result when starting from achiral Nb-methoxycarbonyl-
tryptamin [55]. With 3-unsubstituted indoles, Wenkert and co-workers observed
formation of quinolines as side products, presumably via cyclopropanation of the
indole 2,3-double bond by dimethylvinylidenecarbene [56].
Pirrung and co-workers found that direct 1,1-dimethylpropargylation of
3-bromoindole at the indole nitrogen is possible in about 50% yield without
prior reduction to the indoline, simply by treatment of 3-bromoindole and
1,1-dimethylpropargyl chloride with NaH in DMF [57]. Joullié and co-workers
found that N-propargylation of indoline in boiling THF affords 40, followed by
cyclisation to tricycle 41, which can be prevented by carefully monitoring the
reaction (Scheme 9) [58]. It was also possible to fully convert 40 to 41 at higher
31
Cl
O O
KOH, cat. 18-c-6,
H2O, THF, rf
+
N N
H
N
H
30 32: 44%
O
N +
N
N H
H
33: 6% 34: 8%
Cl
20 35: 9% 36: 8%
Scheme 9 Behaviour of
N-(1,1-dimethylpropargyl) 160 °C, 30 min
indoline (40) on heating [58] N N
40 41
sequence [63, 64]. Indole assembly was also used by Karchava and co-workers who
condensed methyl a-formyl-(o-bromophenyl)acetate with 1,1-dimethyl propargy-
lamine, followed by Cu(I)-catalysed cyclisation to N-tert-prenylindole [65].
3.1 Prenylation at C2
O i)
43
OMe O CO2Me
DCM
NH 2 NH
ii) TFA (excess),
N CHCl3, −40 °C, 10 h N
H 58% H
42 44 (de 50%)
O
COCl CO 2Me
N
N
N piperidine,
Fmoc 45 N DMF, 40 °C N
N O O
Fmoc N
53% from 44
H H
R3 R3 R2 R3
TFA, rt, 48 h
R1 R1
N N N R2
R 2 R1
H H
48 49 50
Me Me Me - 50 50 50 : 50
Me Me Pr 3 52 45 56 : 44
N 2H 4-H2 O
CO2 Me BF3-Et2 O (excess), CO 2Me (3.5 equiv.),
DCM (0.024 M), MeOH-DCM,
NPhth -4 °C, 18 h NPhth 24 h
61% (95% ee)
82%
N N
H
O
51 52
F
CO2 Me NBoc
MeO 2C
54 (1.5 equiv.), NBoc
NH 2 DCM, NaHCO 3, H2 O
HN H
94% O
N
H N
H
53 55
O
N
H
i) TMSI, MeCN, 0 °C R
H
ii) NH 3/MeOH, 20 h N
H O
N
67%
N BF3
H
56: tryprostatin B 57
Scheme 12 Total synthesis of tryprostatin B (56) via BF3-mediated prenyl shift by Prabhakar,
Lobo and co-workers [16]
80 T. Lindel et al.
NHAc
NAc TFA-DCM (3:2), rt, 4 h
N H N
89%
58 59
O
O
OEt OEt O
N
O 61 OEt
N
DCM, 20 °C, 24 h O + NOH
N N H
H H N
93%
60 62 2:1 63
O O
OEt OEt
TFA (5 equiv.),
DCM, 20 °C, 1 h NOH NOH
62 +
97%
N N
H H
64 1:9 65
O O
OEt OEt
N TFA (5 NOH
O equiv.),
N 61 , DCM, N H DCM, 20 °C, N
20 °C, 24 h 1h
87% 88%
66 67 68
Scheme 13 Studies on prenyl migration from the indole-3- to the -2-position by the Nakagawa
[79] and Ottenheijm [80] groups
Indole Prenylation in Alkaloid Synthesis 81
O Mg(NO3 )2 (5 equiv.),
N
prenyl bromide O
(6 equiv.),
N HOAc-NaOAc- N
H O buffer, rt, 20 h N
N 22% (1:1) N H
H H O TFA (8.7
69 + byproducts equiv.),
70 DCM, rt, 20 h
+ 96%
monoprenylated byproduct: O
N
O
N
N H O
N
N
N H H
H O
i) Si I
72
O
N
(1equiv.), NEt3 (1 equiv.),
69 N
DCM, 60 °C, 6 h O
TMS
N
H
73
O O
ii) LHMDS (1.5 equiv.),
prenyl bromide N N
(2.5 equiv.), THF, N N
−78 °C to rt,15h
N H + N H
O O
77%
74 (66%) 75(11%)
O
O N
Yb (OTf)3
N N
(0.1equiv.), O
N H
CH3NO2, rf, 43 h 70%
N N
O
Yb(OTf) 3
76 77 : N-prenyltryprostatin B
CO2Me CO2 Me R
R 1 = H, R 2 = Et
1 R1 = Me, R2 = H R1
N R 1 = H, R 2 = H R 5 N N
H H
90% quant.
83 82 84
(i) tBuOCl,
CO2 Me CO2 Me
NEt 3, DCM-CCl4 ,
0 °C, then −78 °C
NPhth NPhth
(ii) 86
N SnBu3 N
H H
BCl3 , DCM
85 87
83%
via
Cl R
Cl2B
89
N
88 Cl2 B
3.2 tert-Prenylation at C2
NHBoc
O H
O O N
O
NH HO
NH N
HN HN N
OH
acetone, DCM,
-78 to 0 °C N
O H O
40%
+ other isomers
93 94: gypsetin
H
H H N
(i) tBuOCl, DCM, -78 °C, 12 min
N
H C (ii) prenyl-9-BBN, -78 °C, 60 min Cl
60% N
N B
H
95: (-)-hapalindole U 96
H H
H N hn, NEt 3, PhH, 5 h N
H C
Cl 63%
based on recovered
N N
starting material
B H
O
Cl Br OMe
prenyl-9-BBN, NEt3,
THF, rt, 12 h 101
MeO Br
N 72% N
H H O
99 100 LHMDS, THF,
–78 °C to rt, 3 h
1) sBuLi, THF, 61%
–78 °C to rt, 2 h
OMe
O
N O NH
Br H
Br MeO
O 103
OMe
N 2) NaOH, MeOH, HN O
H rt, 4 h
51%
102 104: asterriquinone B1
O i)
43 O
OMe O OMe
DCM
NH2 HN
ii) NaBH4, MeOH,
N 0 °C, 30 min N
H H
42 105, not isolated
O
OMe
NHFmoc N
N
FmocHN O2, Pd(OAc)2 (1 equiv.),
22 MeO2C HOAc, dioxane, H2O,
25 °C, 16 h
N O
BOP-Cl, iPr2NEt, 0 °C, 3 h 38%
N
H 106 (70% from 42)
N N
N N
H 107 H 108
109
O N
O , DCM, N
i) iii) 110 °C,
–5 °C OH
N N H 30 min
N O
ii) O2, sunlamp, 7.5 h, O O N
35%
MeOH, methylene blue, HN N
−28 °C; Me2S N O
110 N
H OH
O N
N O
111: okaramine N
N
H
116
Cl
O K 2 CO 3, acetone, O
Br rf, 8 h Br
CO 2Me CO 2Me
N 113: 22% N
H 114 : 31% H
Br 115: 28% Br
112 113
AlCl3, cyclohexane,
cyclohexane, quant. rf, 24 h
rf, 24 h
O O
Br Br
+
N CO 2Me N CO 2Me
H H
Br Br
114 115
O 117 O
HO
CSA, MgSO 4,
N N
130 °C, 3 h
Ac Ac
120: 62%, 121: 11%
116 118
O O
119
HO
+
CSA, MgSO 4, N N
130 °C, 8 h Ac Ac
120: 27%, 121: 23% 120 121
of 121 to 120. The prenylated compound 121 appears to be formed from 118 by [1,3]
sigmatropic rearrangement. When tert-prenol (119) was used instead, the
same products 120 and 121 were obtained in almost equal yields. Ireland–Claisen
2-tert-prenylation has been achieved by Dunkerton and co-workers starting from
N-protected indoline 2-prenylcarboxylates on treatment with LDA in THF at 78 C
[106].
Plieninger also found that 3-mercaptoindoles (122) can be 2-tert-prenylated
(124) via thia-Claisen rearrangement after S-prenylation to 123 at 0 C [107].
90 T. Lindel et al.
SH S S
prenyl-Br, NaOAc, FSO3 Me, PhH,
acetone, 0 °C K 2CO3 , 2 h
N 88% N 53% N
H H H
4.1 Prenylation at C3
N
H
TFA, petrol HN
125
ether, rt,1 h HN +
+
N N
H H
N
H
corresponding tertiary alcohol in the presence of HCl, which was exploited by Ohta
and co-workers in their synthesis of annonidine A (126) [114].
Pictet-Spengler condensation of C2-blocked indoles. Several syntheses of the
spirotryprostatins from the fungus Aspergillus fumigatus have been published. For a
review covering the literature until 2003, see [115]. ()-Spirotryprostatin B (133)
inhibits the G2/M phase of the mammalian cell cycle at micromolar concentrations.
Similar to a Pictet-Spengler condensation, but at C3 instead of C2, von Nussbaum
and Danishefsky utilised the condensation of prenal (43) and the tryptophan-
derived oxindole 128 (Scheme 26) [116]. This was possible due to the blocking
oxo substituent at C2, which at the same time enhances electron density at C3. The
spiro system 129 was obtained and elaborated further to ()-spirotryprostatin B
(133), although with the necessity to separate four diastereomers of peptide cou-
pling product 131. The double bond of the pyrroline unit of ()-spirotryprostatin B
(133) was introduced by phenylselenation of 131, oxidation with DMDO and
immediate elimination.
Horne and co-workers showed in their synthesis of spirotryprostatin A
that indole-2-chlorinated or -brominated tryptophan derivatives also undergo a
“spiro-Pictet-Spengler condensation” with participation of the indole 3-position
[117, 118]. Imine formation with prenal proceeded quantitatively. However, acid-
induced spirocyclisation afforded, as in the other syntheses of spirotryprostatins, a
mixture of diastereomeric spiro products in only moderate yield.
The Danishefsky group also developed a pathway to the spirotryprostatins via
ring contracting rearrangement of 2-dihydroprenylated indoles obtained by regular
Pictet-Spengler condensation [71, 72]. This approach was also chosen by Wang and
Ganesan who utilised a ring contracting prenyl rearrangement of compound 136,
which was constructed by the low yielding Pictet-Spengler condensation of
L-tryptophan methyl ester 42 and prenal 43 via imine 134 (Scheme 27) [119].
The oxidative ring contraction is, as in the case of the notoamides (see below),
biomimetic and was induced by treatment of b-carboline 136 with NBS in
92 T. Lindel et al.
CO2Me CO 2 Me
DMSO (1 equiv.), 12 N HCl,
NH 2 NH 2
HOAc, PhOH (5 mol%), rt, 4 h
O
N N
H H
42 128
43
O OH
H CO2CH3
NEt3, 3 Å MS, N N 130
pyridine, rt, 9h Boc O
Boc
N 1) LHMDS (2.2 equiv.), N Boc
THF, 0 °C, 30 min
O O
PhSeCl (2.2 equiv.),
CO2CH3 THF, 0 °C, 2 h CO2CH3
N N
2) DMDO (4 equiv.),
THF, 0 °C, 4 h
O 3) separation of O
N diastereomers 38% N
H H
131 132
1) TFA/DCM O N
rt, 30 min
N O
133: (−)-spirotryprostatin B
2) NEt3, DCM
rt, 4 h
O
86% N
H
THF-HOAc-H2O. Spiro compound 137 had been obtained as the Boc analogue by
Danishefsky who devised the further pathway to spirotryprostatin B (133).
Transition metal-mediated prenylation. Use of transition metals allows
prenylation of indole in the 3-position starting from tert-prenol. In a stoichiometric
application, Nicholas and co-workers prenylated 2-methylindole at C3 with isolable
[(3-prenyl)Fe(CO)4]BF4 (in MeNO2), which had been obtained from tert-prenol
and Fe2(CO)9/CO in Et2O [120]. 3-Prenylindole was obtained in 70% yield,
accompanied by only traces of 3-tert-prenylindole. In a Mo(VI)-catalysed reaction,
a 4:1 mixture of 3-prenyl- and 3-tert-prenylindoles was obtained by Zhu and
Indole Prenylation in Alkaloid Synthesis 93
Cl O
CO2 CH 3 CO 2CH3
135
N Fmoc O
N N
, pyridine
N N Fmoc
H H N
DCM, rt, 8 h
32 %
134 136
separation of
diastereomers
N Fmoc
NBS, THF/HOAc/
H 2O, rt, 12 h O
N CO 2CH3 137
68%
N O
H
N N
H
138 140
O
O N 139 85%, ee 84%
N H
H Ph P
2
PPh2
The key step of the synthesis of spirotryprostatin B (133) by Trost and Stiles is
an enantioselective Pd-catalysed decarboxylation-allylation reaction starting from
the prenyl b-oxoester 145, which serves as a pre-nucleophile (Scheme 29) [124].
79% 145
O O
CsOAc
NH HN (7 equiv.),
146
O O SePhBr
PPh2 Ph2P HN (2 equiv.),
N HOAc, 2h
HN
Pd2(dba)3,CHCl3 (10 mol%), 146 (24 94%
mol%), PhMe, 5 min, then addition to a H
O
solution of 145 in PhMe (0.07 M)
81% 147
O O O
O
HN AlMe3 (0.5 M in DCE, HN N
N 2.2 equiv.), DCE, 75 min N
HN
45% H
H O
O
AcO
148 133: spirotryprostatin B
Originally, this reaction type was carried out under thermal conditions (Carroll
rearrangement). Saegusa [125] and Tsuji [126] discovered the possibility of using
Pd catalysts, Williams [127], Pfaltz and Helmchen [128] developed chiral Pd
ligands for that reaction. The Trost synthesis is the first example of submitting
prenyl groups to the key reaction and employed the C2-symmetrical bisphosphane
ligand 146. Initially, a b-oxocarboxylate is formed, subsequently undergoing
decarboxylation to the enolate, which nucleophilically attacks the chiral 3-Pd
complex of the prenyl group. The starting material 143 was synthesised from
diketopiperazine 141 (Scheme 29), which was transesterified with prenol (117)
employing Otera’s tin catalyst (142) [129]. After enolisation of 143, tosylated
oxindole 144 was added as electrophile affording 145. The endgame of the synthe-
sis converts the prenyl group of 147 to the allylic acetate 148 by treatment with in
situ-produced PhSeOAc. Allylic acetate 148 underwent cyclisation to 133 after the
rare conversion to the aluminium amide on treatment with AlMe3.
There are also excellent total syntheses of spirotryprostatins which do not apply
intermolecular functionalisation of the indole 3-position with a C5 prenyl-type
precursor and are, therefore, not discussed in detail. Carreira and co-workers started
from 3-diazo-2-oxindole, which was used in a Rh(I)-catalysed cyclopropanation of
1,3-pentadiene. The resulting cyclopropane was subjected to MgI2-catalysed
ring expansion and added to an imine affording the spiro[5.5] partial structure
[130, 131]. Overman and Rosen built up the indole system by intramolecular
Heck reaction of a functionalised iodoaniline [132, 133]. In a model study building
up the indole system, Cacchi and co-workers synthesised 3-prenylindoles via Pd-
catalysed cyclisation of ortho-alkynyltrifluoroacetanilides with prenyl esters [134].
Use of enamine or iminium electrophiles. In their synthesis of spirotryprostatin B
(133), Fuji and co-workers started from rac-3-prenyl-2-oxindole (149) with an
interesting enantioconvergent nitroolefination affording the C3-quaternised product
151 (ee 78%, Scheme 30). The proline-derived nitroenamine 150 was used with the
pyrrolidine section functioning as auxiliary [135, 136].
Iminium organocatalysis was key to the enantioselective total synthesis of
()-flustramine B (157) from the marine bryozoan Flustra foliacea by MacMillan
and co-workers (Scheme 31) [137], which is discussed here despite not incor-
porating the entire C5 unit in one step. On treatment of the Boc-protected
NO2
(i) BuLi, THF
(ii) ZnCl2 (1 equiv.)
O O
Ph
N Ph N
H N H
(iii) 150
OMe
149 151, ee 78%
NO2 88%
1) O , OH
NHBoc O N
tBu
Br Ph N 153 Br N
H
N N
(0.2 equiv.), TFA. H Boc
DCM, -84 °C, 72 h
2) NaBH 4, MeOH,
152 78% 154, ee 90%
0 °C, 15 min
O CO 2Et O
CO2Et
O 4 Å MS, O
PhMe, rt HN
HN N
HN O Ph O Ph
O 82 %
Ph Ph
158 160
OCH3
OCH3
161
159
CO2Et O 1) H 2, PdCl2, THF/EtOH,
O
60 psi, 36 h
HN O HN
163
N 2) BnO
Ph , BOP, Et3 N,
Ph O MeCN
3) H2, Pd-C, EtOH
OCH3 4) BOP, Et3N, MeCN
162 70%
CO2Et O
O CO2 Et
O O
HN N
pTsOH (1 equiv.) HN
N N
PhMe, rf
N
O 85%
O
OCH 3
164 165
O O
1) LiI, pyridine, D HN N
2) DCC, DMAP, BrCCl3, D, N NaOMe, MeOH
133:
O separation of spirotryprostatin B
HO N diastereomers
25%
S 65%
166
Scheme 32 Three component condensation of the spirocyclic core structure of the spirotry-
prostatins by Williams and co-workers [138]
Elimination of methanol generated the double bond of the prenyl unit. As in the other
syntheses, introduction of the double bond of the pyrroline system proved to be
difficult and gave only moderate yields. Diastereomers of 133 had to be separated.
4.2 tert-Prenylation at C3
Transition metal catalysed coupling with tert-prenol. Recently, several Pd- and
Ru-catalysed 3-tert-prenylations of indole have been published, all of which start
98 T. Lindel et al.
from 3-unsubstituted indole and thereby do not generate a stereogenic centre at C3.
In every case (Scheme 33), yields between 70% and 80% of 3-tert-prenylindole
(168) were obtained and 3-prenylindole (169) was formed as minor side product,
whereas N-prenylated products have not been observed. Tamaru and co-workers
reported a Pd-catalysed reaction employing Et3B as an in situ auxiliary, which did
not prenylate N-methylindole, pointing to the necessity of forming an N–B bond
[141]. In the case of allylation, Tamaru was also able to convert tryptophan methyl
ester to the corresponding 3a-allyl pyrrolo[2,3-b]indole. Breit and co-workers
utilise pyridone-containing, self-assembling Pd-catalysts. Ligand 170 proved
to be very effective for 3-tert-prenylation of indole [142]. A p-allylpalladium
intermediate was suggested. Pregosin and co-workers [143] and Bruneau and
Indole Prenylation in Alkaloid Synthesis 99
O 2 2 NH4
O
H OP2O6H H
NH NH
HN AnaPT (0.25 mM, CaCl2 (10
N
mM), Tris-HCl (50 mM), pH
N 7.5, glycerol, 37 °C, 24 h N H
H O H O
N SePh
SePh
CO2Me 175 (1.5 equiv.)
O
CO2Me
N NHBoc N N
p-TsOH (0.1 equiv.),
Boc Na 2SO 4, DCM Boc H Boc
174 78% 176
F
i)
N N (4 equiv.)
179 i) TMSI (3 equiv.), MeCN,
F N F 0 °C
pyridine, DCM, −15 °C H O
ii) NH 3-MeOH, DMAP
ii) 76%
(1 equiv.) N N NH
Cl H N
3 CO2Me Boc H Boc
MeO2C
NaHCO3 (2 equiv.),
H2O, DCM 180
71%
N3
(2.4 equiv.) N3
H H
O ClOC O
182
N N N N N
H H NH KHMDS (1.1 equiv.), H H
O
THF, −78 °C
O O
80% 183
181
H N
PBu 3 (1.2 equiv.), PhH
184: ardeemin
N N N
72% H H
O
O
Scheme 35 Synthesis of ardeemin (184) via nucleophilic tert-prenylation by Danishefsky and co-
workers [148]
Indole Prenylation in Alkaloid Synthesis 101
Ns Ns
N N 86
t
NBS, BuOH, Br
THF, H2 O SnBu 3
Br Br
O Cs 2CO3 , DCM, rt
N N
H 83% H 74%
185 186
Ns
N 1) NaH, prenyl-Br,
THF
Br N
2) Cs 2CO3 , PhSH, N
Br H
O DMF, rt, 12 h
N
H 3) AlH 3, THF, rf , 2 h
45%
NC prenyl-MgBr,
CN CN
Et2O, THF,
CO2Me
-78 °C, 2 h O O
+
Br Br Br
OH O O
N N H N H
CO2Me CO2Me CO2Me
189 190: 40% 191: 35%
R=H
RuHCl(CO)(PPh3) 3
(2.5 mol%), 194 (5 mol%) OH
HCO2 H (1 equiv.), THF, rf
N O
t
Bu2 P H
O
195: 74%
N O
194: JohnPhos
R
192
[Ir(cod)Cl] 2 (2.5 mol%)
+ OH
196 (5 mol%)
i
PrOH (2 equiv.), O
N
Cs 2CO3 (7.5 mol%), Bn
193 3-nitrobenzoic acid (7.5 mol%),
PhMe, 60 °C, 40 h 197: 90% (96% ee)
R=Bn
Ph2 P
N
MeO OMe
N
PPh2 196
O O N OH
N oxidations
N
Diels-Alder reaction O
HN tert.-prenyl migration
2
O O 3
N
N O
H
H
198 199: paraherquamide A
The 2-tert-prenyl group itself stems from the mevalonate pathway and is introduced
in a non-stereospecific manner, as shown by isotope labelling studies [164].
The order of oxidations, of Diels–Alder reactions and of the tert-prenyl migration
is still a subject of research on the individual alkaloids.
Williams and co-workers reported the non-enantioselective total syntheses
of the heptacyclic indole alkaloids notoamide B (227) and stephacidin A (225)
(Scheme 43) [168], and of their probable biogenetic precursor, notoamide C (213)
(Scheme 41) [169]. The notoamides are fungal indole alkaloids from Aspergillus
species collected from the common mussel Mytilus edulis off Noto Island in the Sea
of Japan [170, 171]. There is also a synthesis of the closely related notoamide J
(217) (Scheme 42) [172].
As advanced precursors in all syntheses, racemic 2-tert-prenylated tryptophan
derivatives were synthesised, which had to be oxygenated at C6 of the indole ring.
Batcho–Leimgruber synthesis afforded 6-OBoc-indole 200 in four steps from
4-methyl-3-nitrophenol employing the Danishefsky tert-prenylation (Scheme 40)
[88]. This procedure did not work for indoles substituted by electron donating
Cl
1) TFA, 97% Cl
2 N
BocO 6 N O
H 2) O H Δ, 17 h
95%
O O
201
200 202
, CuCl Ph
81%
1) EtO C N Ph
2
N 205 (1 equiv.),
HCHO, PBu3 (0.5 equiv.),
HNMe 2 MeCN, rf, 24 h
O N N 2) 1 N HCl, CH 2Cl2,
H 95% O
H
rt, 24 h
75%
203 204
CO2Et CO 2H
H2N FmocHN
1) FmocCl (1.1 equiv.), 1,4-dioxane,
10% aq. Na2CO 3, 0 °C to rt, 16 h
alkoxy or silyloxy groups [174]. Towards notoamides B (227), C (213) and D (215),
the 6-oxy substituent was transformed further to the anellated pyran ring.
Deprotection and O-propargylation of the N-unsubstituted indole 200 with
1,1-dimethylpropargyl carbonate 201 in the presence of CuCl afforded aryl pro-
pargyl ether 202 [173], which underwent thermal Claisen rearrangement in dichlo-
robenzene under reflux [100, 175]. It can be assumed that initial allene formation is
followed by hydrogen shift and 6p electrocyclisation. For the installation of the
racemic amino acid functionality, a method developed by Somei and Kametani
[176, 177] was modified, which proceeds by coupling of the gramine 204 with
the benzophenone imine 205 of glycine ethyl ester in the presence of tributyl-
phosphane, followed by hydrolysis under acidic conditions. Amino acid ethyl ester
206 was Fmoc-protected and hydrolysed to the free acid 207 in high yield
by treatment with trimethyltin hydroxide, following a mild procedure developed
by the Mascaretti [178] and Nicolaou [179] groups.
The racemic tryptophan derivative 207 was condensed with optically pure proline
derivatives following the BOP-Cl protocol. For the synthesis of notoamides C (213)
and D (215), proline ethyl ester was used as coupling partner (Scheme 41), whereas
the synthesis of stephacidin A (225) and notoamide B (227) employed hydroxyproline
ethyl ester 219 (Scheme 43). Towards notoamides C (213) and D (215), the diaste-
reomeric diketopiperazines 210 and 211 had to be separated by chromatography. The
Fmoc can be replaced by a Boc protecting group and BOP-Cl by HATU [172].
The biomimetic key step of the synthesis of notoamides C (213) and J (217)
treats 2-tert-prenylated indoles with Davis’ oxaziridine (212) [180], which induces
oxidative rearrangement of the tert-prenyl group from the indole-2- to the -3-
position (Schemes 41 and 42). Formation of notoamides C (213) and J (217) was
accompanied by the corresponding 3-epi-compounds 214 (48%) and 218 (15%),
respectively, because the Davis’ reagent epoxidised the indole C2¼C3 double bond
with low facial selectivity. Epoxide opening appears to occur preferably at C3,
setting the stage for a [1,5] sigmatropic rearrangement of the tert-prenyl group and
thereby generating the oxo group at C2. The electron donating substituent at C6
probably stabilises the intermediate benzylic cation.
Formation of notoamide D (215), which was also formed together with its
3-epimer (10% combined yield), can be explained by cyclisation via nucleophilic
attack of the neighbouring diketopiperazine nitrogen at the intermediate indole
epoxide, retaining oxygenation of C3 and preventing migration of the 2-tert-prenyl
group. Williams and co-workers were able to selectively synthesise notoamide D
analogues starting from 6-OBoc-indoles by irradiation in the presence of molecular
oxygen and methylene blue [169].
It should be noted that ring contracting migration of the C5 unit is not restricted
to inverse prenyl systems, but also works if the double bond of the tert-prenyl group
has been removed. For the synthesis of the more complex natural products
notoamide B (227) and stephacidin A (225), the 2-tert-prenyl group underwent
intramolecular [4þ2]-cycloaddition to a dehydrogenated diketopiperazine unit,
before its rearrangement to the 3-tert-prenylated oxindole was induced by treatment
with Davis’ reagent (Scheme 43). Hydroxyproline-derived diketopiperazine 221
Indole Prenylation in Alkaloid Synthesis 105
CO 2Et EtO 2C
N HCl
H O
(1.5 equiv.), N
208
iPr FmocHN
2NEt (3.9 equiv.),
BOP-Cl (1.5 equiv.), rt,
overnight
207 N
61% O
H
209
nBu
O O
H N N
S O
N O
H O
212 (2 equiv.),
morpholine, THF, rt,
5 h, then 60 °C, 1 h O N DCM, rt, 24 h
H
O O O
N N
HO N
N N N
H O H O +
O + O N
O O
O N N
O H
H H
nBu
O
O N 212 O N
N S O
H H H
H O
N N O
(2 equiv.), rt, 13 h H
H O 3
O
HO N HO N
H H
217: notoamide J (31%)
216 + 218: 3-epi-notoamide J (15%)
OH EtO 2C
EtO2C OH
O
HCl HN N
O N OH
O N
H H i. DEAD (2.5 equiv.),
PBu3 (2.5 equiv.) H
N O
H DCM, rt, 3h N OMe
74%
221 222
O Me OMe
O O
N N N N
225: stephacidin A
O O
O O
HN N HN N
[1,5] O
O
O N N
H H O
Bu O
O N
N 212 OH
H
S O N
3 H O
O
221 O
(2 equiv.), DCM, O N
H
rt, 18 h
O
N
DEAD (2.5 equiv.),
PBu 3 (2.5 equiv.) 20% aq. KOH,
N MeOH, 0 °C to rt, 12 h
DCM, rt, 3 h H O
O
71% O N
H
229
O
O O
N HN N
N 19
O
OH
O H
O N N
H H O
Scheme 44 Synthesis of (+)-versicolamide B (231) carrying out the Diels–Alder reaction after the
tert-prenyl migration by Williams and co-workers [181]
108 T. Lindel et al.
are avoided and the total synthesis can be conducted enantioselectively, although
separation of diastereomers is still necessary on two occasions. Moreover, a lactim
ether such as 222 was not required for the intramolecular Diels–Alder reaction,
which also runs starting from the amide 229, which is obtained from 228 via
Mitsunobu dehydration. Treatment of 229 with aqueous KOH apparently forms
the azadiene intermediate 230 followed by cycloaddition of the double bond of the
tert-prenyl group. Versicolamide B (231) is a diastereomer of notoamide B (227)
and occurs in both enantiomeric forms in Aspergillus species.
The discovery of 2-tert-prenylated deformylflustrabromine (235) as a major
metabolite of Flustra foliacea collected near Helgoland [182–184] prompted us to
investigate its presumably biomimetic conversion to the pyrrolo[2,3-b]indole
flustramine C (236) [185], which is tert-prenylated at the bridgehead C3a (Scheme 45).
For the synthesis of deformylflustrabromine (235), Nb-methyltryptamine (232)
was converted to Nb-formyl-Nb-methyltryptamine which cleanly underwent
NH
NBS (1 equiv.),
THF, 0 °C, 20 min
63% N
N N
Br
238 239
N N
(i) NBS (1 equiv.), Br Br
acetone, 0 °C,
30 min (ii) NaOH
N N N
H H
d N 30 d N 105 N Cl
NH
tBuOCl (1 equiv.),
Br Br
N N
d N 127 NEt3, THF, -78 °C to rt d N 127
H H
235 243
H
N
Cl
Br
N - Cl
H
CDCl3 244 Br N H
N
- Cl
N 246
Br
N
H
245
[1,5] NaOH
Br N Br N d N 90
N N
d N 217
H
Scheme 47 Possible mechanisms of the tert-BuOCl-induced tert-prenyl shift. 15N NMR shifts are
referenced to ammonia [185]
of C3 at the chlorinated side chain nitrogen, since the polarity of an N–Cl bond is
not pronounced. Ring expansion of 245 would afford pyrroloindole 246 which
would then undergo [1,5] sigmatropic tert-prenyl rearrangement to form protonated
flustramine C (247), which was observed in the NMR spectrum.
Claisen rearrangement of 2-prenyloxy- or -thioindole. A viable strategy to
synthesise 3-tert-prenylindoles employs Claisen rearrangement starting from
2-prenyloxyindoles. The Sakamoto group published a total synthesis of rac-
flustramine C (236) featuring a domino olefination-isomerisation-Claisen rear-
rangement as the key step (Scheme 48) [189, 190]. Starting from 6-bromoindole
(248), 6-bromoindolin-3-one 249 was obtained in three steps by N-acetylation,
oxidation to the 2-methoxy-3-hydroxyindoline with MoO5-HMPA and elimination
of methanol on treatment with SnCl4. The prenyloxy group was introduced at C2
Indole Prenylation in Alkaloid Synthesis 111
1) Red-Al (5 equiv.),
0 °C, PhMe
CN
N N
O
2) MeI, Na2CO3, Br N
Br N Br N
acetone, rf
H
252 236: rac-flustramine C (34%) 253 (26%)
a:
prenyl-Br, K2 CO3
S S + S
N N N
H
254 255 256
b:
CO2 Et CO 2Et
i) BnBr, DME, rt, 4 h
NOH ii) prenyl-Br, K2 CO 3, NOBn
acetone, 14 d
S S
N N
H H
Br
257 258
CO2 Et
S + NOBn + NOBn
N S S
N N
H
MeS N
O prenyl-Br (8 equiv.), K2CO3 (4
NH equiv.), dioxane, rt, 7 d
HN
N SMe O
H
262
MeS N
O
NH
Br
HN
H
N SMe O
O MeS N
NH 264 (15%)
+
HN N
O MeS
N SMe O
NH
H
Br
HN
N SMe O
263 265 (18%)
15%
265, TiCl4 ,
LiAlH 4, THF, rf
O H
H N
N
N 266 : amauromine
N H
H O
indole 2-positions and was reacted with prenyl bromide in the presence of base,
which probably leads to formation of the bis-sulfonium salt 263 as intermediate.
A [3,3] sigmatropic rearrangement of the prenyl groups results in the installation
of tert-prenyl groups in the indole 3-positions. Takase isolated diastereomers 264
(15%) and 265 (18%) in relatively low yields, of which 265 was reduced and
cyclised to amauromine (266) employing TiCl4/LiAlH4 in THF [196], again in
low yield (15%).
Other approaches. The construction of a tert-prenyl group at C3 may also
proceed stepwise and finish with the introduction of the terminal carbon by
methylenation of an aldehyde. Kawasaki and co-workers followed that strategy in
their total synthesis of ()-flustramine A (188) [197], and Sabahi and Rainier in
their synthesis of debromodihydroflustramine C [198]. Qin and co-workers assem-
bled ()-ardeemin (184) in the same manner, after having installed an acetic acid
114 T. Lindel et al.
CO2Et
S S
N Rh2 (OAc)4 , DCM , rt N
H H
81% EtO2 C
267 269
CO2 Et
EtO 2C
NHBoc NHBoc
HgCl2 , H 2O, MeCN
85%
S S
N N
H
270 271
Scheme 51 Sequential sulphur ylide Claisen and Cope rearrangements leading to C4-prenylation
of indole [201]
Indole Prenylation in Alkaloid Synthesis 115
60 C accomplishing 4-prenylation in 67% yield. In the same manner and similar
yields 5- and 6-prenylindoles were synthesised [202].
In an in situ version of that reaction, Kn€ olker and co-workers prenylated
bromocarbazoles by treatment with excess prenyl bromide and Ni(cod)2, obtaining
the natural products glycomaurrol and micromeline [203]. Utilising Ni-based
prenylation methodology, Kn€ olker also synthesised the carbazole alkaloid rac-
neocarazostatin B (277) from Streptomyces sp. carrying a prenyl group in the indole
5-position (Scheme 52) [204]. The carbazole system itself had been assembled by
Kn€olker’s iron-mediated CC and CN bond formation affording iron complex 274,
which was demetalated and regioselectively brominated to 275. Treatment of 275
with [prenylNiBr]2 (2 equiv.) provided 276 which was reduced to the natural
product 277. The synthesis of carbazole alkaloids has been comprehensively
reviewed in an excellent article by Kn€ olker and Reddy [205].
Very recently, She and co-workers reported the total synthesis of the
5-prenylated indole alkaloids tardioxopiperazine A, isoechinulin A and variecolorin
C, via Pd-catalysed coupling of an in situ-produced prenylindium reagent with a
5-triflyloxytryptophan derivative in DMF at 100 C [206].
Yokoyama and co-workers installed a 4-prenyl group by Heck reaction of
tert-prenol (119) with 4-bromotryptophan (280), which was synthesised from
4-bromoindole (278) by reaction with rac-serine/Ac2O in HOAc (Scheme 53).
An Aspergillus acylase was employed for kinetic resolution of the racemic mixture
Ac 2O (2 equiv.),
N N
H HOAc, 80 °C, 90 min H
278 58% 279
i)
H2 N CO2 H OH
119 H CO2H
Br N
Pd(OAc)2 , K 2CO3 ,
H 2O, 130 °C, 2 h
N
H ii) HOAc, 60 °C, 2 h N
H
91%
280: 49%, ee 99% 281: clavicipitic acid
Bn
BnHN i)
N Pd-C, HCO2 NH 4
43
O (4 equiv.), MeOH,
HO TfO
(3 equiv.) rt, 30 min
H H
N N
+
TfO
N 284 N
H H
43%
285: rac-aurantioclavine
PdCl2 (PPh3 )2 , dppp, NEt 3,
HCO 2H, DMF, 100 °C, 2 h
Ishikura and co-workers achieved the same without having to brominate the
indole 4-position because of the presence of a 5-hydroxy group in their starting
indole 282 and of the tryptamine side chain which probably participates via imine
formation (Scheme 53) [208]. Pictet–Spengler-type condensation of 282 with
prenal (43) afforded the azepinoindole 283 which was N-debenzylated with
HCO2NH4/Pd-C leading to the ergot alkaloid rac-aurantioclavine (285) from Peni-
cillium aurantiovirens, together with the oxygenated compound 284. Side product
284 could be converted to further amounts of the natural product 285.
Chemoenzymatic synthesis. As for other indole positions, enzymatic prenylation
appears to become competitive. Li employed the 4-dimethylallyltryptophan
synthase FgaPT2 [211] and the 7-dimethylallyltryptophan synthase DMATS
[212] (both from Aspergillus fumigatus) to prenylate tryptophan derivatives (286)
on the 100 nanomolar scale. In all cases shown in Scheme 54, yields >90% were
obtained overnight, based on recovered starting material. As coupling partner,
ammonium prenylpyrophosphate (8) was used as always.
> 90%
O
8, FgaPT2 (0.001 OH
X
equiv.), Tris-HCl (50 4
m M, pH 7.5), CaCl2 (5 NHR 1
m M), water, 37 °C
N
R2 287
1 2
O R =H, R =H, X=H
X OH R 1=Me, R2 =H, X=H
R 1=H, R2 =Me, X=H
NHR 1 OP 2 O6 (NH4 )3 R 1=H, R2 =H, X=O H
8
N O
R2 286 X OH
R 1 =H, R 2=H, X=H
R 1 =Me, R 2=H, X=H NHR 1
R 1 =H, R 2=Me, X=H 8, His 6 -7-DMATS 7 N
R 1 =H, R 2=H, X=OH (0.0006 equiv.), Tris- R2
HCl (50 mM, p H 7.5), 288
CaCl2 (10 mM), water,
37 °C R1 =H, R 2 =H, X=H
R1 =M e, R 2=H, X=H
> 90% R1 =H, R 2 =Me, X=H
R1 =H, R 2 =H, X=OH
H 289
H
N N
OP2O6(NH4)3
N OH N OH
O O
tert-geranyltransferase L txB,
Tris buffer, pH 8, 30 °C,4 h
N N
H H
N3 CO 2Me CO2Me
O
PhMe, rf, 3 h
N3
O O
NaOMe, MeOH, 53%
-15 °C to rt, 6 h
86%
291 292
OH
40%
2) BF3-MeOH, O 13% N O
O N O
MeOH, rt, 17 h H H
39%
Cl
(1.2 equiv.) H 2, Lindlar,
MeOH, rt, 30 min
N CuCl (0.1 equiv.), N 86%
H NEt3 (1.2 equiv.),
THF, 0 °C to rt, 12 h
297 91% 298
In 2003, Ganesan and co-workers reported the total synthesis of the fungal
natural product okaramine J (309, Scheme 58) from Penicillium simplicissimum
and Aspergillus aculeatus, which for the first time featured an N1 to C7 aza-Claisen
rearrangement of a tert-prenyl group with regioinversion [52]. Following a route
developed by Danishefsky and co-workers [227], treatment of the protected trypto-
phan derivative 301 with NBS afforded the unstable dihydropyrroloindole 302,
which was converted to the hydroxylated pyrroloindole 303 by DMDO oxidation
and subsequent NaBH4 reduction. The anthracene sulfonyl protecting group was
chosen because it was to be removed later under reductive conditions without
dehydrating the hydroxyindolenine 308.
Installation of the N-tert-prenyl group was accomplished via CuCl2-catalysed
propargylation of the indoline 303 in moderate yield (55%), followed by Lindlar
hydrogenation of 304. The key aza-Claisen rearrangement proceeded in the high
yield of 84% simply by treating the N-tert-prenylindoline 305 with TFA in DCM,
leading to the presumably charge-accelerated [3,3] sigmatropic rearrangement of
the tert-prenyl group affording 7-prenylindoline 306. Ganesan and co-workers
propose that the required conformation of the N–C bond is preferred only in the
case of 306 because of steric interaction with the bulky anthracenesulfonyl group
(Thorpe–Ingold effect).
The endgame of the synthesis features the intermolecular amide coupling
with 2-tert-prenyltryptophan methyl ester (307) employing PyBOP/NEt3 and the
cyclisation to the diketopiperazine 309 employing HBTU/iPr2NEt. Building block
307 was synthesised by Danishefsky and co-workers in course of their total
syntheses of gypsetin (94) and brevianamide E.
Other approaches. Treatment of an analogue of ()-indolactam V (1) with
prenyl bromide in HOAc/NaOAc afforded 7-prenylated, 7-tert-prenylated and
2-prenylated products [228]. It was also possible to build up the indole ring of
Indole Prenylation in Alkaloid Synthesis 121
CO 2tBu O
1) DMDO, DCM,
NBS, OtBu -78 °C
O NEt3, DCM
HN O 2) NaBH 4, MeOH
S O N
S O 75% from 301
N N
H H Anth
301 302
O O
HO O tBu Br HO O tBu H 2 , Pd-Al2 O3 ,
O N O EtOAc
N
S O S O
N H CuCl2 (0.2 equiv.), N H 99%
H Anth iPr NEt, THF Anth
2
O
O
HO O tBu
HO OtBu TFA (5 equiv.), O
DCM, rt, 16 h N
N O S O
S O N H
84% Anth
N H H
Anth
305 306
1) Al-Hg, THF-H 2 O O
2) KOH, MeOH, dioxane HO
NH
3) HBTU, iPr 2NEt (3 equiv.), NH
DCM, 7 d N
N H
H O
36%
309: okaramine J
Scheme 58 Synthesis of the fungal natural product okaramine J (309) by aza-Claisen rearrange-
ment by Ganesan and co-workers [52]
122 T. Lindel et al.
O O
NH 2 312
ZnCl2 (2 equiv.), Br
O
xylene, rf
N
23%
310 311
O
O OH
LiAlH4
N N
H H
313 314
1) Ac 2 O, DMSO N
2) Wittig
3) HNMe2 , H 2CO
N O
H
EtO2 C
NH
316
HN
315 O
O H O H
N N
EtO 2C H
N 1) 0.1 N NaOH, N
H O H2 O-dioxane H O
N 2) rf N
H H
[231, 232]. The rearrangement is achieved in 23% yield in boiling xylene in the
presence of zinc chloride and probably proceeds by aza-Claisen–Cope sequences
for both prenyl groups. Tert-Prenylated intermediates have not been identified.
Prior to that work, only one publication on aromatic aza-Claisen rearrangements
starting from N-allylanilines had been published by Hurd and Jenkins [233]. The
synthesis of echinulin (318) continues with the assembly of the indole ring of
313 by condensation with bromoketone 312, followed by LiAlH4 reduction to
alcohol 314. Oxidation to the aldehyde was carried out by Ac2O-DMSO. Wittig
methylenation and Mannich reaction afforded the gramine 315, which was con-
densed with diketopiperazine 316. Decarboxylation became possible after saponi-
fication of 317 affording a mixture of epimeric echinulins with the correct absolute
configuration in the L-alanine-derived portion.
6 Conclusion
A major development in the past 5 years has been the identification and biotechno-
logical production of fungal enzymes catalysing prenylations and tert-prenylations
of tryptophan derivatives, including diketopiperazines, with ammonium prenylpyr-
ophosphate. Currently, conversions of milligram amounts of substrates are possible,
addressing all indole positions except C5, C6 and the bridgeheads. Substantial
progress has also been made in the field of transition-metal catalysed tert-
prenylation of indole N1 and C3. A third important sector is defined by prenyl or
tert-prenyl shifts around the indole nucleus. This field has been worked on for about
four decades, but still delivers most competitive, often biomimetic strategies.
Still, there remain many open problems. It would be efficient to be able to
prenylate or tert-prenylate indole regioselectively at the benzene positions 4, 5
and 6 without having to rely on pre-functionalisation such as halogenation or
hydroxylation. Here, deeper investigation of prenyl shifts and of CH functiona-
lisation on indole is required. Enantioselective catalysis has to be explored further
towards the synthesis of optically pure 3-prenylated or -tert-prenylated alkaloids.
A chiral version of NBS would be helpful. In the case of conformationally flexible
starting materials, the diastereoselectivity of oxidative cyclisations of tryptophan-
derived diketopiperazines is still not convincing. In the area of chemoenzymatic
synthesis, the number and availability of enzymes has to be enhanced and their
substrate tolerance has to be elucidated in more detail.
References
4. Baird KJ, Grundon MF, Harrison DM, Magee MG (1981) Heterocycles 15:713–717
5. Wei W, Cai C, Kota S, Takahashi V, Ni F, Strosberg AD, Snyder JK (2009) Bioorg Med
Chem Lett 19:6926–6930
6. Jain HD, Zhang C, Zhou S, Zhou H, Ma J, Liu X, Liao X, Devequ AM, Dieckhaus CM,
Johnson MA, Smith KS, Macdonald TL, Kakeya H, Osada H, Cook JM (2008) Bioorg Med
Chem 16:4626–4651
7. Kawashima Y, Amanuma F, Sato M, Okuyama S, Nakashima Y, Sota K, Moriguchi I (1986)
J Med Chem 29:2284–2290
8. Kodato S, Nakagawa M, Hongu M, Kawate T, Hino T (1988) Tetrahedron 44:359–377
9. Nakagawa M, Fukushima H, Kawate T, Hongu M, Une T, Kodato S, Taniguchi M, Hino T
(1989) Chem Pharm Bull 37:23–32
10. Sanz-Cervera JF, Stocking EM, Usui T, Osada H, Williams RM (2000) Bioorg Med Chem
8:2407–2415
11. Kim JS, Padnya A, Weltzin M, Edmonds BW, Schulte MK, Glennon RA (2007) Bioorg Med
Chem Lett 17:4855–4860
12. Manian RDRS, Jayashankaran J, Raghunathan R (2007) Tetrahedron Lett 48:1385–1389
13. Jones GB, Moody CJ (1989) J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 1:2449–2454
14. Jones GB, Moody CJ (1988) J Chem Soc Chem Commun 166–167
15. Issa S, Walchshofer N, Kassab I, Termoss H, Chamat S, Geahchan A, Bouaziz Z (2010) Eur J
Med Chem 45:2567–2577
16. Cardoso ASP, Marques MMB, Srinivasan N, Prabhakar S, Lobo AM, Rzepa HS (2006) Org
Biomol Chem 4:3966–3972
17. Go ML, Leow JL, Gorla SK, Sch€ uller AP, Wang M, Casey PJ (2010) J Med Chem
53:6838–6850
18. Endo Y, Shudo K, Itai A, Hasegawa M, Sakai S (1986) Tetrahedron 42:5905–5924
19. Chen J, Lou J, Liu T, Wu R, Dong X, He Q, Yang B, Hu Y (2009) Arch Pharm 342:165–172
20. Simon G, Couthon-Gourves H, Haelters JP, Corbel B, Kervarec N, Michaud F, Meijer L
(2007) J Heterocycl Chem 44:793–801
21. Nakagawa M, Kodato S, Hongu M, Kawate T, Hino T (1986) Tetrahedron Lett
27:6217–6220
22. Morales-Rı́os MS, Santos-Sánchez NF, Mora-Pérez Y, Joseph-Nathan P (2004) Heterocycles
63:1131–1142
23. Manian RDRS, Jayashankaran J, Raghunathan R (2007) Synlett 874–880
24. Somei M, Sayama S, Naka K, Shinmoto K, Yamada F (2007) Heterocycles 73:537–554
25. Nakatsuka S, Miyazaki H, Teranishi K, Goto T (1986) Tetrahedron Lett 27:2391–2394
26. Grundon MF, Hamblin MR, Harrison DM, Logue JND, Maguire M, McGrath JA (1980)
J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 1 1294–1298
27. Prajapati D, Gadhwal S (2004) Tetrahedron 60:4909–4913
28. Huynh MU, Elston MC, Hernandez NM, Ball DB, Kajiyama S, Irie K, Gerwick WH,
Edwards DJ (2010) J Nat Prod 73:71–74
29. López-Alvarado P, Caballero E, Avendaño C, Menéndez JC (2006) Org Lett 8:4303–4306
30. Cardoso AS, Srinivasan N, Lobo AM, Prabhakar S (2001) Tetrahedron Lett 42:6663–6666
31. Cardoso ASP, Marques MMB, Srinivasan N, Prabhakar AC, Lobo AM (2007) Tetrahedron
63:10211–10225
32. Plate R, Theunisse AWG, Ottenheijm HCJ (1987) J Org Chem 52:370–375
33. Takase S, Itoh Y, Uchida I (1985) Tetrahedron Lett 26:847–850
34. Takase S, Uchida I, Tanaka H, Aoki H (1986) Tetrahedron 42:5879–5886
35. Takase S, Itoh Y, Uchida I, Tanaka H, Aoki H (1986) Tetrahedron 42:5887–5894
36. Grundmann A, Kuznetsova T, Afiyatullov SS, Li SM (2008) ChemBioChem 9:2059–2063
37. Voûte N, Philp D, Slawin AMZ, Westwood NJ (2010) Org Biomol Chem 8:442–450
38. Curran DP, Suh YG (1984) J Am Chem Soc 106:5002–5004
39. McMichael KD, Korver GL (1979) J Am Chem Soc 101:2746–2747
40. Gajewski JJ, Conrad ND (1979) J Am Chem Soc 101:2747–2748
Indole Prenylation in Alkaloid Synthesis 125
86. Padwa A, Akiba M, Cohen LA, MacDonald JG (1983) J Org Chem 48:695–703
87. Depew KM, Danishefsky SJ, Rosen N, Sepp-Lorenzino L (1996) J Am Chem Soc 118:
12463–12464
88. Schkeryantz JM, Woo JCG, Siliphaivanh P, Depew KM, Danishefsky SJ (1999) J Am Chem
Soc 121:11964–11975
89. Yamada F, Fukui Y, Shinmyo D, Somei M (1993) Heterocycles 35:99–104
90. Korakas P, Chaffee S, Shotwell JB, Duque P, Wood JL (2004) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
101:12054–12057
91. Shinohara C, Hasumi K, Takei Y, Endo A (1994) J Antibiot 47:163–167
92. Nuber B, Hansske F (1994) J Antibiot 47:168–172
93. Schkeryantz JM, Woo JCG, Danishefsky SJ (1995) J Am Chem Soc 117:7025–7026
94. Baran PS, Maimone TJ, Richter JM (2007) Nature 446:404–408
95. Zhun IV, Ignatenko AV (2004) Russ Chem Bull 53:2221–2223
96. Tatsuta K, Mukai H, Mitsumoto K (2001) J Antibiot 54:105–108
97. Miller KA, Welch TR, Greshock TJ, Ding Y, Sherman DH, Williams RM (2008) J Org Chem
73:3116–3119
98. Wagger J, Grošelj U, Svete J, Stanovnik B (2010) Synlett 1197–1200
99. Pirrung MC, Liu Y, Deng L, Halstead DK, Li Z, May JF, Wedel M, Austin DA, Webster NJG
(2005) J Am Chem Soc 127:4609–4624
100. Cox RJ, Williams RM (2002) Tetrahedron Lett 43:2149–2152
101. Liu K, Wood HB, Jones AB (1999) Tetrahedron Lett 40:5119–5122
102. Russell RA (1975) Aust J Chem 28:2535–2538
103. Baran PS, Corey EJ (2002) J Am Chem Soc 124:7904–7905
104. Plieninger H, Sirowej H, Raum D (1971) Chem Ber 104:1863–1868
105. Kawasaki T, Masuda K, Baba Y, Takada K, Sakamoto M (1994) Chem Pharm Bull
42:1974–1976
106. Dunkerton LV, Chen H, McKillican BP (1988) Tetrahedron Lett 29:2539–2542
107. Plieninger H, Kraemer HP, Sirowej H (1974) Chem Ber 107:3915–3921
108. Achenbach H, Franke D, Renner C (1985) Arch Pharm 318:1147–1150
109. Araki S, Manabe S, Butsugan Y (1984) Bull Chem Soc Jpn 57:1433–1444
110. Yadav JS, Reddy BVS, Reddy PM, Srinivas C (2002) Tetrahedron Lett 43:5185–5187
111. Zhu X, Ganesan A (2002) J Org Chem 67:2705–2708
112. Amat M, Hadida S, Sathyanarayana S, Bosch J (1994) J Org Chem 59:10–11
113. Achenbach H, Franke D (1987) Arch Pharm 320:91–92
114. Somei M, Funamoto T, Ohta T (1987) Heterocycles 26:1783–1784
115. Lindel T (2003) In: Schmalz HG, Wirth T (eds) Organic synthesis highlights V. Wiley VCH,
Weinheim, Germany, pp 360–367
116. von Nussbaum F, Danishefsky SJ (2000) Angew Chem Int Ed 39:2175–2178
117. Miyake FY, Yakushijin K, Horne DA (2004) Angew Chem Int Ed 43:5357–5360
118. Miyake FY, Yakushijin K, Horne DA (2004) Org Lett 6:4249–4251
119. Wang H, Ganesan A (2000) J Org Chem 65:4685–4693
120. Dieter JW, Li Z, Nicholas KM (1987) Tetrahedron Lett 28:5415–5418
121. Yang H, Fang L, Zhang M, Zhu C (2009) Eur J Org Chem 666–672
122. Trost BM, Quancard J (2006) J Am Chem Soc 128:6314–6315
123. Amijs CHM, López-Carrillo V, Echavarren AM (2007) Org Lett 9:4021–4024
124. Trost BM, Stiles DT (2007) Org Lett 9:2763–2766
125. Tsuda T, Chujo Y, Nishi SL, Tawara K, Saegusa T (1980) J Am Chem Soc 102:6381–6384
126. Tsuji J, Yamada T, Minami I, Yuhara M, Nisar M, Shimizu I (1987) J Org Chem
52:2988–2995
127. Williams JM (1996) Synlett 705–710
128. Helmchen G, Pfaltz A (2000) Acc Chem Res 33:336–345
129. Otera J (1993) Chem Rev 93:1449–1470
130. Meyers C, Carreira EM (2003) Angew Chem Int Ed 42:694–696
Indole Prenylation in Alkaloid Synthesis 127
174. Grubbs AW, Artman GD III, Williams RM (2005) Tetrahedron Lett 46:9013–9016
175. Elomri A, Michel S, Tillequin F, Koch M (1992) Heterocycles 34:799–806
176. Somei M, Karasawa Y, Kaneko C (1981) Heterocycles 16:941–949
177. Kametani T, Kanaya N, Ihara M (1981) J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 1 959–963
178. Furlán RLE, Mata EG, Mascaretti OA, Peña C, Coba MP (1998) Tetrahedron 54:
13023–13034
179. Nicolaou KC, Estrada AA, Zak M, Lee SH, Safina BS (2005) Angew Chem Int Ed 44:
1378–1382
180. Davis FA, Townson JC, Vashi DB, ThimmaReddy T, McCauley JP, Harakal ME, Gosciniak
D (1990) J Org Chem 55:1254–1261
181. Miller KA, Tsukamoto S, Williams RM (2009) Nat Chem 1:63–68
182. Lysek N, Rachor E, Lindel T (2002) Z Naturforsch C: Biosci 57c:1056–1061
183. Peters L, K€onig GM, Terlau H, Wright AD (2002) J Nat Prod 65:1633–1637
184. Peters L, Wright AD, Krick A, K€ onig GM (2004) J Chem Ecol 30:1165–1181
185. Lindel T, Br€auchle L, Golz G, B€
ohrer P (2007) Org Lett 9:283–286
186. Kramer GW, Brown HC (1977) J Organomet Chem 132:9–27
187. Miyake FY, Yakushijin K, Horne DA (2004) Org Lett 6:711–713
188. Adla SK, Golz G, Jones PG, Lindel T (2010) Synthesis 2161–2170
189. Kawasaki T, Terashima R, Sakaguchi K, Sekiguchi H, Sakamoto M (1996) Tetrahedron Lett
37:7525–7528
190. Kawasaki T, Ogawa A, Terashima R, Saheki T, Ban N, Sekiguchi H, Sakaguchi K, Sakamoto
M (2005) J Org Chem 70:2957–2966
191. Kawasaki T, Shinada M, Ohzono M, Ogawa A, Terashima R, Sakamoto M (2008) J Org
Chem 73:5959–5964
192. Kawasaki T, Nagaoka M, Satoh T, Okamoto A, Ukon R, Ogawa A (2004) Tetrahedron
60:3493–3503
193. Malapel-Andrieu B, Piroëlle S, Mérour JY (1998) J Chem Res 594–595
194. Booker-Milburn KI, Fedouloff M, Paknoham SJ, Strachan JB, Melville JL, Voyle M (2000)
Tetrahedron Lett 41:4657–4661
195. Bycroft BW, Landon W (1970) J Chem Soc D Chem Commun 967–968
196. Mukaiyama T, Hayashi M, Narasaka K (1973) Chem Lett 291–294
197. Kawasaki T, Shinada M, Kamimura D, Ohzono M, Ogawa A (2006) Chem Commun
420–422
198. Sabahi A, Rainier JD (2010) ARKIVOC 8:116–125
199. He B, Song H, Du Y, Qin Y (2009) J Org Chem 74:298–304
200. Ignatenko VA, Deligonul N, Viswanathan R (2010) Org Lett 12:3594–3597
201. Nyong AM, Rainier JD (2005) J Org Chem 70:746–748
202. Plieninger H, Sirowej H (1971) Chem Ber 104:2027–2029
203. Forke R, Krahl MP, Krause T, Schlechtingen G, Kn€ olker HJ (2007) Synlett 268–272
204. Kn€olker HJ, Fr€
ohner W, Wagner A (1998) Tetrahedron Lett 39:2947–2950
205. Kn€olker HJ, Reddy KR (2002) Chem Rev 102:4304–4428
206. Dai Y, Xie X, Xu S, Ma D, Tang S, She X (2011) Org Lett 13:2302–2305
207. Yokoyama Y, Hikawa H, Mitsuhashi M, Uyama A, Hiroki Y, Murakami Y (2004) Eur J Org
Chem 1244–1253
208. Yamada K, Namerikawa Y, Haruyama T, Miwa Y, Yanada R, Ishikura M (2009) Eur J Org
Chem 5752–5759
209. Yokoyama Y, Hikawa H, Mitsuhashi M, Uyama A, Murakami Y (1999) Tetrahedron Lett
40:7803–7806
210. Xu Z, Hu W, Liu Q, Zhang L, Jia Y (2010) J Org Chem 7626–7635
211. Steffan N, Uns€old IA, Li SM (2007) ChemBioChem 8:1298–1307
212. Kremer A, Li SM (2008) Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 79:951–961
213. Luk LYP, Tanner ME (2009) J Am Chem Soc 131:13932–13933
214. Lee SL, Floss HG, Heinstein P (1976) Arch Biochem Biophys 177:84–94
Indole Prenylation in Alkaloid Synthesis 129
215. Tsai HF, Wang H, Gebler JC, Poulter CD, Schardl CL (1995) Biochem Biophys Res
Commun 216:119–125
216. Liu X, Walsh CT (2009) Biochemistry 48:11032–11044
217. Gallagher RT, Clardy J, Wilson BJ (1980) Tetrahedron Lett 21:239–242
218. Laakso JA, Gloer JB, Wicklow DT, Dowd PF (1992) J Org Chem 57:2066–2071
219. Ruan HL, Stec E, Li SM (2009) Arch Microbiol 191:791–795
220. Moody CJ (1983) J Chem Soc Chem Commun 1129–1131
221. Moody CJ (1984) J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 1 1333–1337
222. El-Araby ME, Bernacki RJ, Makara GM, Pera PJ, Anderson WK (2004) Bioorg Med Chem
12:2867–2879
223. Martin T, Moody CJ (1988) J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 1 241–245
224. Martin T, Moody CJ (1985) J Chem Soc Chem Commun 1391–1392
225. Ramesh K, Kapil RS (1986) Indian J Chem 25B:462–465
226. Xiong X, Pirrung MC (2007) J Org Chem 72:5832–5834
227. Kamenecka TM, Danishefsky SJ (2001) Chem Eur J 7:41–63
228. Irie K, Isaka T, Iwata Y, Yanai Y, Nakamura Y, Koizumi F, Ohigashi H, Wender PA,
Satomi Y, Nishino S (1996) J Am Chem Soc 118:10733–10743
229. Okabe K, Muratake H, Natsume M (1990) Tetrahedron 46:5113–5120
230. Okabe K, Natsume M (1991) Tetrahedron 47:7615–7624
231. Takamatsu N, Inoue S, Kishi Y (1971) Tetrahedron Lett 12:4665–4668
232. Takamatsu N, Inoue S, Kishi Y (1971) Tetrahedron Lett 12:4661–4664
233. Hurd CD, Jenkins WW (1957) J Org Chem 22:1418–1423
Top Curr Chem (2012) 309: 131–162
DOI: 10.1007/128_2011_134
# Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011
Published online: 3 May 2011
Contents
1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132
2 Construction of the Pyrroloiminoquinone Skeleton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
3 Synthetic Works by Other Groups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
3.1 Makaluvamines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
3.2 Isobatzellines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142
3.3 Bispyrroloiminoquinones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
3.4 Discorhabdins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
4 Our Synthetic Studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147
4.1 Discorhabdin C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147
4.2 Development of Methods for the Synthesis of Complex
Pyrroloiminoquinone Alkaloids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
4.3 Makaluvamine F . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151
4.4 Total Synthesis of Discorhabdin A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152
4.5 Prianosin B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155
4.6 Discorhabdin A Analogs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156
5 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158
Y. Kita (*)
College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ritsumeikan University, 1-1-1 Nojihigashi, Kusatsu, Shiga
525-8577, Japan
e-mail: [email protected]
H. Fujioka
Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Osaka University, 1-6 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka
565-0871, Japan
e-mail: [email protected]
132 Y. Kita and H. Fujioka
1 Introduction
Marine organisms contain various compounds which are useful for their life and
relation with other organisms, and are getting much attention because the natural
products isolated from them hopefully have potential as new medicinally valuable
agents, agricultural chemicals, cosmetics, and health foods [1–5]. Among them,
the marine sponges of the genera Latrunculia, Batzella, Prianos, and Zyzzya are
a rich source of alkaloid metabolites containing either the tetra-, hexa-, or octa-
hydrogenated variants of pyrrolo[4,3,2-de]quinoline 1, pyrrolo[4,3,2-de]pyrrolo
[2,3-h]quinoline 2, pyrido[2,3-h]pyrrolo[4,3,2-de]quinoline 3, and pyrroloimino-
quinone 4 skeletons.
N N N N
N N NH N N N
H
O
1 2 3 4
R5HN N R2 N N R2 N N R2
R1 R H
O O R1 O R1
makaluvamines discorhabdins tsitsikammamines
isobatzellines (prianosins, epinardins) wakayin
R4 + R1O R3 +
N 3 N
R1
10
R2 N N N
H
O R3 O R2
R1 R2 R3 R4 R1 R2 R3
makaluvamine A H NH2 Me H makaluvamine D H H H
makaluvamine B H H Me H, Δ3 makaluvamine E H Me H, Δ10
makaluvamine C H NH2 H Me makaluvamine G H Me Me, Δ10
makaluvamine H H H Me Me makaluvamine J H H Me
makaluvamine I H NH2 H H makaluvamine K H Me H
makaluvamine N Br NH2 H H makaluvamine L H H Me, Δ10
makaluvamine M H H H, Δ10
makaluvamine P H Me Me
makaluvamine V OMe H H
OH N
Br
N
HO
S N NH2
O
O
N N
H H
O HO OH
makaluvamine F N-1-β-D-ribofuranosylmakaluvamine I
R1 R2
N 3
isobatzelline A SMe Cl
R2
isobatzelline B SMe H
isobatzelline C H H
H2N N R1
isobatzelline D SMe Cl, Δ3
Fig. 2 Isobatzelline O Me isobatzelline E H Cl, Δ3
alkaloids
H HO HO 18
N + HO +
N HN N
N N N N N N
H H H H
O O R1 O R
wakayin tsitsikammamine A R1 = H N -18 oxime analogue of
tsitsikammamine B R1 = Me tsitsikammamine A R = H
N -18 oxime analogue of
tsitsikammamine B R = Me
O
O
H
3 R 17 discorhabdin A R = Br +
4
2 16 prianosin B R = Br, Δ 16 R N
5
N
6
discorhabdin B R = Br, Δ4 S
S
15
discorhabdin I R = H, Δ 4
8
11 14 discorhabdin Q R = Br, Δ4, Δ16 H N N
H N N H H
H H debromodiscorhabdin A R = H O
O
discorhabdin D R = H
discorhabdin L R = OH
OH OH OH
H H
Br
+ 4 +
HO N N R N
S S S
H N N H N N H N N
H H H H H H
O O O
discorhabdin X dihydrodiscorhabdin A dihydrodiscorhabdin D R = H
dihydrodiscorhabdin B Δ4 dihydrodiscorhabdin L R = OH
O
O O
Br 17
16
Br Br
N
N N
MeS
7 S S
N N
H N N N N
O Me H H H H
O O
discorhabdin S Δ16
discorhabdin T Δ7, Δ16 discorhabdin W
discorhabdin U Δ7
O O OH
H
R1 Br 17 Br
+ +
16 HO
N HN N
O
R2 N N N N HO N N
H H H H H H
O O O
R1 R2
discorhabdin Y discorhabdin Z
discorhabdin C Br H
discorhabdin E H H
discorhabdin F H H, Δ16
discorhabdin O H OMe
+ + 3 3
NH3 R R +
NH3 N
O + N
4
HN R4 R4
[O] [O] [O]
7
N N Path A O N R2 H2N N R2
H H N
O H
O R1 O R1
tryptamine O
HO makaluvamines A-C, H, I, N
isobatzellines A-E
Path B NH2
then [O]
OH HO
7
R7 R +
+ N
N
N N R6
ox. phenol- N N R6 H
H H
coupling 5 O
O R
tsitsikammamines
O makaluvamines D, E, G, J-M, P
R8 Br OH
early sulfur Br
N introduction
N
late sulfur S
9 N introduction
R N
H H N N
O
H H
ox. phenol- O
discorhabdins C, E, F, O coupling makaluvamine F
O O O
Br R H
+
N N R N
MeS S S
N N H N N H N N
H H H H H H
O O O
discorhabdins S, T, U discorhabdins A, B, I, Q discorhabdins D, L
ring system. The other is the route via discorhabdins C, E, F, and O, which were
obtained by the preliminary phenol coupling. Further sulfur introduction then gives
discorhabdins S, T, U, A, B, I, Q, D, and L.
Most of the pyrroloiminoquinone alkaloids described above exhibit a strong
cytotoxicity towards human tumor cell lines, they are recognized to be the lead
compounds for developing new anticancer drugs, and they have attracted the
synthetic interest of many groups.
Our group accomplished the total syntheses of discorhabdin C in 1992 [38],
makaluvamine F in 1999 [39, 40], and discorhabdin A in 2002 [41, 42]. We also
accomplished the first total synthesis of prianosin B in 2009 [43]. We now report the
progress towards the synthesis of pyrroloiminoquinone alkaloids, mainly since
2000 including our studies, in this chapter.
Marine Pyrroloiminoquinone Alkaloids 137
Y a
X N HN
route a route b CHO
R3 R3 R3
N N NHR1
b
OR2 R1 O R1 OR2
NHPG NHPG
O
oxidation
1)
(KSO3)2NO
MeO N (Fremy′s salt) MeO N
HO CAN etc. deprotection
R1 O R1
N3
N
HN
cyclization oxidation
2)
(KSO3)2NO
(Fremy′s salt) MeO N
MeO N MeO N CAN etc.
1 1 O R1
(MeO) R (MeO) R
N3
N3
PhI(OCOCF3)2
3) +
TMSOTf
MeO N
MeO N (CF3)2CHOH
1 H2O MeO R1
MeO R
N HN N
oxidation
CHO CAN
MeO NO2
MeO N MeO N
(OMe) (MeO) R1 O R1
Scheme 4 General methods for the formation of the pyrroloiminoquinone skeleton by route b
3.1 Makaluvamines
Makaluvamines A [44–48], B [44, 48], C [44, 48, 49], D [44, 47, 48, 50–52],
E [44, 46], I [47, 52], and K [47], and N-1-b-D-ribofuranosylmakaluvamine I [52]
have already been synthesized. Most of these syntheses were reported before 2000.
Since 2000, there have been few synthetic works of natural products, while the
studies of the synthesis of their analogs and their biological activity are receiving
much attention.
For the synthesis of the makaluvamine family, most of the synthetic studies have
been done through route a in Schemes 2 and 3 for the construction of the pyrroloi-
minoquinone skeleton. As an example of the synthesis of the makaluvamines by
route a, Yamamura and Nishiyama’s synthesis is shown in Scheme 5. Thus,
Yamamura et al. reported the total synthesis of makaluvamines A–E (Scheme 5).
They started from the indole 5, which was converted to the lactam 6. Makaluva-
mines A, B, and E were synthesized from pyrroloiminoquinone 7, obtained from 6
(R1¼Me, R2¼H) by reduction and oxidation, and by the attack of the proper amino
functions. Makaluvamine C was synthesized from 6 (R1¼H, R2¼Me). Makaluva-
mine D was synthesized from the iminoquinone 8, obtained from 5 (R¼Bn) [44].
The total synthesis of veiutamine [53], which has a carbon side chain and a
structure similar to makaluvamine D, has also been achieved via route a (Scheme 6).
The 6-methoxyindole derivative 9 was converted to the Boc compound 11. Regio-
selective ortholithiation at 6-position using the Boc group as a directing group and
coupling with an aldehyde followed by intramolecular cyclization afforded the
tetracyclic compound 12, which was converted to veiutamine [54].
On the other hand, the synthesis of the makaluvamine family by route b shown in
Schemes 2 and 4 has rarely been reported. Kraus et al. reported the total synthesis of
makaluvamine C (Scheme 7). In their synthesis, the 6,6-bicyclic compound 14 was
formed first. The reduction of 14 then gave the indole 15, which was converted to
makaluvamine C by demethylation and in situ oxidation with Fremy’s salt [49].
We have discovered the inter- and intramolecular nucleophilic addition of
aromatic compounds mediated by hypervalent iodine reagent in CF3CH2OH or
Marine Pyrroloiminoquinone Alkaloids 139
O
R2 +
N HN
TeocHN CO2Et N
1) BH3 • SMe2 NH4Cl
2) CAN / 60 % 90 %
aq.HClO4 MeO N H2N N
MeO N MeO N
60 % O Me O Me
OMe R OMe R1 7
6 makaluvamine A
5 (R = Me, Bn) OH
1) BH3 • SMe2 NH2
2) CAN 97 % 10 % Pd / C
3) NH4OH AcO Δ
HO +
Me + N HN
N N
OH
N N
MeO N H2N N
H2N N H Me
H H 26 % O O
O 8 Me
O
tyramine BF3 • OEt2
92 % makaluvamine C 60 % makaluvamine B
hydrochloride
OH OH
+ +
HN HN
N N N N
H H
O Me OMe
makaluvamine D makaluvamine E
O 1) H2, Pd / C (93 %)
1) s-BuLi 2) TBAF (99 %)
p-MOMOC6H4CHO 3) Fremy’s salt +
O N HN
(72 %) (33 %)
MOMO HO
2) NaH (86 %) 4) NH4Cl then HCl
(89 %)
MeO N H2N N
H
TIPS O
12
veiutamine
(CF3)2CHOH in 1994 (For details, see Scheme 23). In 2006, Nishiyama et al. also
used the hypervalent iodine reagent prepared from iodobenzene under electrolytic
conditions and developed a new method for the synthesis of tetrahydroquinolines
(Scheme 8). Thus, the reaction of the methoxyamide 16 with the active species
140 Y. Kita and H. Fujioka
Me
O N O N Me Me +
N N
CHO H2, Pd / C TMSCl, NaI
76 % Fremy′s salt
BocHN NO2
BocHN N 73 % H2N N
OMe OMe H H
OMe O
13 14 15 makaluvamine C
O O
O PhI
CCE, LiClO4 +
N N
HN CF3CH2OH OMe OMe
OMe
MeO MeO
MeO
16 17
(CCE: Constant Current Electrolysis)
NO2 CO2Me
NO2 CO2Me
BnO PhI BnO
CONHOMe
CCE at 10 mA
LiClO4, CF3CH2OH 62 % N O
20
21 OMe
Ts
NO2 CHO 1) Zn, AcOH 51 % N
BnO 2) TsCl, NaH 85 % HO Fremy′s salt
21 3) H2, Pd / C, EtOAc THF / pH 7 phosphate
N 99 % N buffer 99 %
Boc Boc
22 23
HN
O
Ts
N HN known
1) TFA +
O quant. O H2N N
H
2) KOH makaluvamine I
O N MeOH O N
Boc 83% H HN
24 damirone C HO O
+
N N
H H
makaluvamine D
TBSO
O NBoc TBSO
Cl O O
TBSO N O
HN O O
N O
O O O O
KOH O
24 +
68 % NaH, 18-crown-6,
NBoc
O N DMF 50 % (β : α = 23 : 2) O O 26-β 26-α
25 Boc
NBoc N
HO OH 27 HO OH
N-1–b-D-ribofuranosylmakaluvamine I
CF3CO2– +
HN N HN
CAN 1) RNH2
2) TFA
MeO N MeO N RHN N
H H H
OMe O O
28 8 29
H3C O
X N N
N N or N
O CH3 R2HN
H 3C N H2N N R1 N
O O O 32
30 O 31
1
R = H or CH2OCH3 R2 = PhCH2CH2, HOCH2CH2
X = NH2+, imino APBI
PhCH2, 4-HOC6H4CH2CH2
X = O, APBI OMs
MeO
HN
1) Fuming HNO3 HN 1) Fremy′s salt N
O2 N NO2 1) H2, Pd / C pH 7
2) ethanolamine 2) HCO2H or
N 2
N
3) MsCl, Py. (MeOCH2CO)2O 2) R NH3Cl
3) 4N HCl X N Y N R1
X R1 (X = OMe)
33 X 34 35 O 36
X = OMe X = OMe X = OMe
Y = NH2, NHR2
NAc2 NHAc NH2
3.2 Isobatzellines
Isobatzellines A [64], B [64], and C [48, 65] have already been synthesized. Most of
the syntheses of the isobatzellines were reported before 2000. After 2000, few
synthetic studies of the natural products have been carried out.
Marine Pyrroloiminoquinone Alkaloids 143
CF3CO2- CF3CO2-
+ +
HN HN
R = 4-CH3, 4-OCH3, 3,4-Di-OCH3
R R 3,4,5-Tris-OCH3, 3,4-OCH2O
N N 4-Cl, 4-F etc.
N N
H H H H
O O
37 38
OHC OHC
N N N
1) MeI, NaH (99 %)
2) (MeS)2, SO2Cl2 (98 %)
CHO
3.3 Bispyrroloiminoquinones
There have been few synthetic studies of the wakayin and tsitsikammamine alka-
loids. Model synthetic studies of them were reported by Cave [66] and Barret [67]
more than 10 years ago and, recently, several new synthetic studies have appeared.
Velu et al. reported the regioselective synthesis of the bispyrroloquinone and
bispyrroloiminoquinone ring system found in the wakayin and tsitsikammamine
alkaloids. First, they accomplished the synthetic route to the bispyrroloquinone
system (Scheme 13). The treatment of N-tosyl-6-(benzylamino)-1H-indole-4,7-
dione 42 with ethyl acetoacetate or 1-phenylbutane-1,3-dione in the presence of
ceric ammonium nitrate (CAN) in MeOH/CH2Cl2 resulted in the formation of the
144 Y. Kita and H. Fujioka
O O O O O
CH3COCH2COR R R
(R = OEt, Ph) NaOEt
Bn CAN EtOH
N N Me N N Me N N
H MeOH / CH2Cl2
O Ts Bn O Ts Bn O H
42 43 44
R = OEt (58 %) R = OEt (71 %)
R = Ph (67 %) R = Ph (86 %)
O O
Pd black R
R = OEt (75 %)
HCOONH4
Me R = Ph (74 %)
EtOH N N
H O H
45
N O N
EtO
CH3COCH2COOEt
Bn CAN Me
N N N N
H MeOH / CH2Cl2
O R Bn O R
Scheme 14 Synthesis of 46 47
bispyrroloiminoquinone ring R = Ts R = Ts (38 %)
system R=H R = H (41 %)
1) EtOH,NaHCO3, H N
N
4 A°molecular
N
sieve, reflux +
2) 1 N NaOH, N N
dioxane, rt N N N
H O H O H
52 (70 : 30) 53
OMe
NHBoc MeO NHBoc NHBoc
O
O O
H
OH N
+ +
OH N
N N OH N
NH2 O Ts H
O Ts O Ts
54 55 MeO
56 (19 %) 57 (57 %)
MeO HO
N N
1) TFA 1) 1 N NaOH
56
2) MnO2 2) BBr3
3) abs . EtOH N N N N
4 A° molecular H H H
O Ts O
sieve, reflux 29 %, 2 steps
22 %, 3 steps 58 tsitsikammamine A
N N
H H
N N
1) TFA 1) 1N NaOH
57
2) MnO2 N 2) BBr3 N
3) abs . EtOH H
O Ts O
4 A° molecular 28 %, 2 steps
sieve, reflux 59 HO
MeO isomer of tsitsikammamine A
16 %, 3 steps
removed by 1 N NaOH treatment, and demethylation using BBr3 afforded the free
base of tsitsikammamine A. A similar procedure gave the nonnatural regioisomer
from compound 57 (Scheme 16).
146 Y. Kita and H. Fujioka
3.4 Discorhabdins
OTMS
Kita et al. Br Br
1) MeCH=C(OMe)OTMS,CH2Cl2 N
2) PIFA, CF3CH2OH (42 %)
R=H N N
(PIFA: PhI(OCOCF3)2) H H
I O
Ph
OH OCOCF3 O
Br Br Br Br
Yamamura et al.
N N
LiClO4, CCE at 3 mA (24 %)
R=H
N N N N
H R H H
O O
R = Ts
NHBoc OH
Br
O N
NaHCO3, EtOH N
TFA o -bromotyramine . HCl
CH2Cl2 2 steps 46 %
MeO N MeO N N N
O Ts O Ts H
O Ts
61 62 63
O O
Br Br
CuCl2, Et3N, O2 N N
NaOMe, MeOH
CH3CN 67 %
84 %
N N N N
H H H
O Ts O
64 (±)-discorhabdin E
O O O
Br Br Br
HS
N N reduction N
S S N S
H 65
N N N N N N
H H H H sun light H
O O H
O
uncharacterized
discorhabdin W discorhabdin B
degradation
products
4.1 Discorhabdin C
O – O
CF3CO2
Br Br Br Br
+
HN N
MeI, K2CO3
acetone
N N 90 °C, 4 h
N N
H H 54 % H
O O Me
discorhabdin C
discorhabdin P
O O O
–
Br CF3CO2 Br Br
+ +
HN HN HN
MeI, K2CO3 MeS
S MeS
acetone
80 °C, 3 h +
N N N N N N
H H H
H H H
O O Me O
discorhabdin B discorhabdin U (39 %) 66 (22 %)
O O OH
NHR
Br Br Br Br Br Br
O N N
route a route b
N N N N N N
H H H H H H
O O O
67 discorhabdin C 68
formation as the final step of the synthesis (route a). Another approach involves the
oxidative coupling of the indoloquinone imine as the final step (route b).
Unfortunately, all attempts to effect the final imine formation between the trypt-
amine nitrogen and the indoloquinone carbonyl in these types of intermediates failed
(route a in Scheme 21). We then studied an alternative approach (route b), in which
the phenolic coupling of the previously produced aminoindoloquinone imine is
employed in the final step, to accomplish the first total synthesis of discorhabdin C.
The benzaldehyde derivative 69 was converted to the indoloquinone 70. The direct
imine formation from the indoloquinone was achieved by protection of the indolo-
quinone nitrogen of 70 with the tosyl group followed by an acidic dehydrative
treatment to yield an unstable indoloquinone imine 72, which was subjected to the
following one-pot transformation without further purification.
The reaction of the indoloquinone imine 72 with 3,5-dibromotyramine hydro-
bromide caused a facile substitution reaction and subsequent detosylation to give the
Marine Pyrroloiminoquinone Alkaloids 149
O NHTEOC
OH O NHTEOC
CHO p-TsOH
TsCl
MeO N t-BuOK CH3CN
H MeO N
MeO O 92 % Ts
69 O
70 (TEOC = CO2 (CH2)2SiMe3) 71
OH
O
Br Br
N Br Br
3, 5-dibromo- N N
tyramine 1) silylation
Et3N, EtOH 2) PIFA
MeO N 51 % CF3CH2OH
N N
Ts H N N
O H 42 % H
O H
72 68 O
discorhabdin C
OH O
Br Br
N N
S S
N N H N N
H H H H
Fig. 6 Makaluvamine F and O O
discorhabdin A makaluvamine F discorhabdin A
The new methods (Schemes 23–25) valuable for the synthesis of complex
pyrroloiminoquinone alkaloids are based on the hypervalent iodine-induced nucle-
ophilic substitution of p-substituted phenol ethers via reactive cation radical inter-
mediates. Thus, we found a novel hypervalent iodine induced nucleophilic
substitution of p-substituted phenol ethers in the presence of a variety of nucleo-
philes, such as TMSN3, TMSOAc, and b-diketones, etc., in 1994. For this reaction
the reaction solvent was quite important, and CF3CH2OH and (CF3)2CHOH worked
very well (Scheme 23) [76].
–
OCOCF3
OMe OMe
Ph OCOCF3
PhI(OCOCF3)2 I
Nu
(PIFA) SET Nu–
MeO R MeO + R
(CF3)2CHOH
R CT-complex cation radical PhI R
74
73
Nu = N3, OAc, O O
etc.
R1
RO
RO
R2
(MeO)n N
76 R3
R1 R1
OR = OMe, OEt, Oi-Pr
MeO PIFA, TMSOTf MeO O(CH2)2O (51-94 %)
R2 + R2
CF3CH2OH / ROH – R1
N3 R3 N R3
(MeO)n (MeO)n O
75 N2+
R2
(MeO)n N
R3
77
(57-89 %)
R1 S R 3 CH2Cl2 R1 S R3 R 1 S R3
R2 -78 °C R2
Bn Bn R2
78 n = 1-3
79 (53-98 %)
Scheme 25 Intramolecular cyclization of phenyl ethers bearing an alkyl sulfide side chain
Marine Pyrroloiminoquinone Alkaloids 151
R1 PhI = O R1 R1 R1
TMSN3
+ +
R2 S MeCN R2 S H R2 N3
S R2 S
R3 3
R I R3 –
R3
Ph N3
80 OTMS 81 82
4.3 Makaluvamine F
N3 N
PIFA
TMSOTf
(±)-makaluvamine F
(CF3)2CHOH / 86 %
MeO N MeO N
H2O (50:1) H
MeO O Br
Ac
51% 8
83
+
HO
(quant.) S NH3
87 CF3CO2–
10 % Pd / C,
EtOH / CF3CO2H
Br 1) PIFA 1) BF3 • Et2O, EtSH
BF3•Et2O 2) Ac2O Br
In 1987, prianosin A [22] was isolated from the Okinawan sponge Prianos melanos
by Kobayashi et al. and, in 1988, discorhabdin A [23] was isolated from New
Zealand sponges of the genus Latrunculia by Munro et al. Some years later, it was
found that prianosin A and discorhabdin A were the same compound. Discorhabdin
A (prianosin A) has a strong cytotoxicity (IC50 values of 37, 14, 40, and 13 ng/mL
against L1210, L5178Y, P388, and xrs-6 in vitro, respectively, and ED50 values of
50 ng/mL against P388) and shows antimicrobial activity. Discorhabdin A has a
unique sulfur-containing fused ring system incorporating azacarbocyclic spirocy-
clohexanone and pyrroloiminoquinone systems, and shows the most powerful
cytotoxic activity among the isolated discorhabdins.
First, on the basis of the hypothesis by Munro and co-workers shown in
Scheme 1, we examined the biosynthetically plausible route from makaluvamine
F using our previously developed oxidative spirocyclization reaction with PIFA. As
a result, the oxidative cyclization of makaluvamine F as well as the trimethylsily-
lated makaluvamine F using PIFA under various conditions yielded a complex
mixture, probably due to the high reactivity of the iodine(III) reagent toward the
sulfide (Scheme 28).
We then altered the synthetic strategy. The new strategy included the precon-
struction of the spirodienone system using the hypervalent iodine(III) reagent and
the final introduction of the sulfur group to the cross-linked system. Scheme 29
shows the synthesis of the spirodienone in discorhabdin A. The tritylation of the
Marine Pyrroloiminoquinone Alkaloids 153
OH O
Br Br
N N
spiro-
S S
cyclization
N N H N N
H H H H
O O
makaluvamine F discorhabdin A
OH OTBS
OH
Br 1) DIBAH Br
1) TrCl, Et3N 1) 0.1 N HCl / MeOH
2) TBSCl, DBU
2) NBS, DMF 2 steps 84 % N
2)
NHTr NHTr
NH2 . HCl 2 steps 65 %
CO2Me MeO N
89 67 %
88 CO2Me OTBS O
90 Ts
91
OH O O
Br Br Br
N PIFA N N
MK10 +
CF3CH2OH 6S
49 %
N N N N N N
H H H
TBSO O Ts TBSO O Ts TBSO O Ts
92 93 94
4.8 : 1
L-tyrosine methyl ester hydrochloride 88 with TrCl and Et3N followed by mono-
bromination with NBS yielded 89 (two steps, 65% yield). The reduction of 89
with DIBAH followed by silylation of the resulting alcohol with TBSCl gave the
bis-silylated compound 90, and a coupling reaction with pyrroloiminoquinone 91,
which was prepared by our previously developed PIFA-induced pyrroloiminoqui-
none formation (see Scheme 27), yielded 92. The spirodienone formation of 92
using PIFA effectively proceeded in the presence of montmorillonite K10 (MK10)
to give a diastereomeric mixture of 93 and 94. Both diastereomers were readily
separated by column chromatography on silica gel. The major isomer 93 has the
same absolute stereochemistry (S configuration) of the spirocenter (C-6) as that of
the natural discorhabdin A (Scheme 29).
In our total synthesis of discorhabdin A, the N,O-acetal compound 96 acted as a
key compound for the construction of the N,S-acetal compound (see Scheme 31),
and was prepared by the oxidative fragmentation reaction of an a-amino alcohol 95
initially using the highly toxic lead tetraacetate. We then developed a new method
using the low toxic hypervalent iodine(III) reagent. Thus, the reaction of the
154 Y. Kita and H. Fujioka
a-amino alcohol 95, obtained from 93 by desilylation (see Scheme 31) and bis-
(trifluoroacetoxy)iodo(III) pentafluorobenzene (C6F5I(OCOCF3)2) in the presence
of NaHCO3, afforded the N,O-acetal compound 96 in 79% yield, maybe through the
five-membered ring intermediate (Scheme 30) [81].
Desilylation of 93 followed by an oxidative fragmentation reaction with C6F5I
(OCOCF3)2 and MeOH gave the N,O-acetal intermediate 96. The p-methoxyben-
zylthio group was efficiently introduced in the presence of BF3·Et2O to give the
unstable N,S-acetal 97 as a diastereomeric mixture. The treatment of 97 with 30%
HBr–AcOH followed by aqueous work up with MeNH2 produced the N-tosylated
discorhabdin A 98. Ultimately, we developed an efficient one-pot transformation
procedure yielding 98 from 96. Finally, removal of the tosyl group of 98 with
NaOMe in THF gave discorhabdin A in the optically pure form. The synthetic
product as its HCl salt was identical in all respects with the natural discorhabdin A
including its optical rotation (Scheme 31).
O O
Br C6F5I(OCOCF3)2 Br
N NaHCO3 N
CH3CN/MeOH
N
N N O I MeO N N
H C6F5 H
HO O Ts O Ts
95 79 %
96
O O
Br Br
N 1) BF3 • Et2O N p-MeOBnSH
6S 2) C6F5I (OCOCF3)2 CH2Cl2
NaH CO3, MS3A –78 ~ 4 °C
8S N N CH3CN/MeOH MeO N N
H 2 steps 70% H
TBSO O Ts O Ts
93
96
O O
O
Br Br
Br
N N
HBr / AcOH NaOMe
S S
then THF / MeOH
aq. MeNH2 61 %
p-MeOBnS H N N H N N
N 22 % H H
H H O
O Ts
97 98 (+)-discorhabdin A
OTBS O O
Br PIFA Br Br
N MK10 N
(D)-88 • HCl R
CF3CH2OH S
N N N N N
H
H H H H
TBSO O Ts TBSO O
ent-93
ent-92 diastereomeric mixture (–)-discorhabdin A
(R : S = 4.8 : 1) [α]D-390
4.5 Prianosin B
O
Br N N
N + –
NaN3 (cat.) 15 N N N Ts
S
DMF
N
70 °C, 1 h TsN3 N
N –
H N 48 % O Ts
H O
–
O Ts I
N3
98
H
H O
N – N
16 NTs Br
N N * N
S
N N
-N3–
O O N N
II III H
H H
O
prianosin B
*
H O O
– +
N N N Ts –
N N N S C6H4CH3 N3– + S
H OH
–O A
(see Scheme 31) with NaN3 in DMF at 70 C caused detosylation and dehydrogena-
tion to produce prianosin B in 48% yield. The reaction mechanism for the dehydro-
genation reaction of pyrroloiminoquinone using NaN3 may be as follows. The
nucleophilic attack of N3 on the tosyl residue followed by the addition of metallated
enamine to TsN3 produces the intermediate II. Dehydrogenation would proceed by
the intramolecular elimination via a six-membered transition state to produce the
intermediate III and isomerization to produce prianosin B. Regeneration of the
azide anion during the reaction makes possible the use of catalytic amount of
NaN3. The reproduction of the azide anion was deduced from the presence of the
toluenesulfinic acid observed in the 1H-NMR spectrum [43].
However, Velu et al. reported that treatment of the pyrroloiminoquinone under
the same reaction conditions except for the reaction temperature gave only the
detosylated product. This shows that the reaction temperature is very important for
the dehydrogenation (Scheme 34) [82].
N N
NaN3 (1.2 eq.)
DMF or MeOH
R N 25 °C, 4 h R N
53-84 % H
O Ts O
99 100
R = OMe or
NH(CH2)1–2Ar
Scheme 34 Detosylation by N3
N N N N
H * H
H H R3
O O
Oxa analogues of
Discrhabdin A discorhabdin A
S atom O atom
5-membered ring 6-membered ring
O O O
X X
N N N
O O O
N N N N N N
H H H
O Ts O Ts O Ts
101 102a-c 103a-c
(a X = Br; b X = Cl; c X = I)
5 Conclusion
References
24. Perry NB, Blunt JW, Munro MHG (1988) Discorhabdin D, an antitumor alkaloid from the
sponges Latrunculia brevis and Prianos sp. J Org Chem 53:4127–4128
25. Reyes F, Martin R, Rueda A, Fernandez R, Montalvo D, Gomez C, Sanchez-Puelles JM
(2004) Discorhabdins I and L, cytotoxic alkaloids from the sponge Latrunculia brevis. J Nat
Prod 67:463–465
26. Dijoux MG, Gamble WR, Hallock YF, Cardellina JH II, Soest R, Boyd MRA (1999)
New discorhabdin from two sponge Genera. J Nat Prod 62:636–637
27. Ford J, Capon RJ (2000) Discorhabdin R: a new antibacterial pyrroloiminoquinone from two
Latrunculiid marine sponges, Latrunculia sp. and Negombata sp. J Nat Prod 63:1527–1528
28. El-Naggar M, Capon RJ (2009) Discorhabdins revisited: cytotoxic alkaloids from Southern
Australian marine sponges of the genera Higginsia and Spongosorites. J Nat Prod 72:
460–464
29. Cheng J, Ohizumi Y, W€alchli MR, Nakamura H, Hirata Y, Sasaki T, Kobayashi J (1988)
Prianosins B, C, and D, novel sulfur-containing alkaloids with potent antineoplastic activity
from the Okinawan marine sponge Prianos melanos. J Org Chem 53:4621–4624
30. Gunasekera SP, Zuleta IA, Longley RE, Wright AE, Pomponi SA (2003) Discorhabdins S, T,
and U, new cytotoxic pyrroloiminoquinones from a deep-water caribbean sponge of the genus
Batzella. J Nat Prod 66:1615–1617
31. Lang G, Pinkert A, Blunt JW, Munro MHG (2005) Discorhabdin W, the first dimeric
discorhabdin. J Nat Prod 68:1796–1798
32. Blunt JW, Munro MHG, Battershill CN, Copp BR, McCombs JD, Perry NB, Prinsep M,
Thompson AM (1990) From the Antarctic to the antipodes: 45 of marine chemistry. New J
Chem 14:761–775
33. Grkovic T, Ding Y, Li X-C, Webb VL, Ferreira D, Copp BR (2008) Enantiomeric discorhab-
din alkaloids and establishment of their absolute configurations using theoretical calculations
of electronic circular dichroism spectra. J Org Chem 73:9133–9136
34. Grkovic T, Pearce AN, Munro MH, Blunt JW, Davies-Coleman MT, Copp BR (2010)
Isolation and characterization of diastereomers of discorhabdins H and K and assignment of
absolute configuration to discorhabdins D, N, Q, S, T, and U. J Nat Prod 73:1686–1693
35. Jeon J, Na Z, Jung M, Lee H-S, Sim CJ, Nahm K, Oh K-B, Shin J (2010) Discorhabdins from
the Korean marine sponge Sceptrella sp. J Nat Prod 73:258–262
36. Na M, Ding Y, Wang B, Tekwani BL, Schinazi RF, Franzblau S, Kelly M, Stone R, Li X-C,
Ferreira D, Hamann MT (2010) Anti-infective discorhabdins from a deep-water Alaskan
sponge of the genus Latrunculia. J Nat Prod 73:383–387
37. Lill RE, Major DA, Blunt JW, Munro MHG, Battershill CN, Mclean MG, Baxter RL (1995)
Studies on the biosynthesis of discorhabdin B in the New Zealand sponge Latrunculia sp.
J Nat Prod 58:306–311
38. Kita Y, Tohma H, Inagaki M, Hatanaka K, Yakura T (1992) Total synthesis of discorhabdin C:
a general aza spiro dienone formation from O-silylated phenol derivatives using a hypervalent
iodine reagent. J Am Chem Soc 114:2175–2180
39. Kita Y, Egi M, Tohma (1999) Total synthesis of sulfur-containing pyrroloiminoquinone
marine product, ()-makaluvamine F using hypervalent iodine(III)-induced reactions.
Chem Commun 143–144
40. Kita Y, Egi M, Takada T, Tohma H (1999) Development of novel reactions using hypervalent
iodine(III) reagents. Total synthesis of sulfur-containing pyrroloiminoquinone marine
product, ()-makaluvamine F. Synthesis 885–897
41. Tohma H, Harayama Y, Hashizume M, Iwata M, Egi M, Kita Y (2002) Synthetic studies on
the sulfur-cross-linked core of antitumor marine alkaloid, discorhabdins: total synthesis of
discorhabdin A. Angew Chem Int Ed 41:348–350
42. Tohma H, Harayama Y, Hashizume M, Iwata M, Kiyono Y, Egi M, Kita Y (2003) The first
total synthesis of discorhabdin A. J Am Chem Soc 125:11235–11240
43. Wada Y, Otani K, Endo N, Harayama Y, Kamimura D, Yoshida M, Fujioka H, Kita Y (2009)
The first total synthesis of prianosin B. Tetrahedron 65:1059–1062
160 Y. Kita and H. Fujioka
63. Passarella D, Belinghieri F, Scarpellini M, Pratesi G, Zunino F, Gia OM, Via LD, Santoroa G,
Danielia B (2008) Synthesis and biological evaluation of pyrroloiminoquinone derivatives.
Bioorg Med Chem 16:2431–2438
64. Alvarez M, Bros MA, Gras G, Ajana W, Joule JA (1999) Syntheses of batzelline A, batzeline
B, isobatzelline A, and isobatzelline B. Eur J Org Chem 1173–1183
65. Tao XL, Nishiyama S, Yamamura S (1991) Total syntheses of batzelline C and isobatzelline
C, the novel pyrroloquinoline alkaloids isolated from the marine sponge Batzella sp. Chem
Lett 1785–1786
66. Zhang L, Cava MP, Rogers RD, Rogers LM (1998) Synthesis of a wakayin model compound:
oxidative formation of a new pyrrole ring in the indol-3-ylindoloquinone system. Tetrahedron
Lett 39:7677–7678
67. Barret R, Roue N (1999) Synthesis of a bispyrroloquinone structure analogue to wakayin.
Tetrahedron Lett 40:3889–3890
68. Murugesan S, Nadkarni DH, Velu SE (2009) A facile synthesis of bispyrroloquinone and
bispyrroloiminoquinone ring system of marine alkaloids. Tetrahedron Lett 50:3074–3076
69. Legentil L, Lesur B, Delfourne E (2006) Aza-analogues of the marine pyrroloquinoline
alkaloids wakayin and tsitsikammamines: synthesis and topoisomerase inhibition. Bioorg
Med Chem Lett 16:427–429
70. Legentil L, Benel L, Bertrand V, Lesur B, Delfourne E (2006) Synthesis and antitumor
characterization of pyrazolic analogues of the marine pyrroloquinoline alkaloids: wakayin
and tsitsikammamines. J Med Chem 49:2979–2988
71. Rives A, Delaine T, Legentil L, Delfourne E (2009) Total synthesis of the marine pyrroloi-
minoquinone alkaloid tsitsikammamine A. Tetrahedron Lett 50:1128–1130
72. Nishiyama S, Cheng JF, Tao XL, Yamamura S (1991) Synthetic studies on novel sulfur-
containing alkaloids, prianosins and discorhabdins: total synthesis of discorhabdin C.
Tetrahedron Lett 32:4151–4154
73. Tao XL, Cheng JF, Nishiyama S, Yamamura S (1994) Synthetic studies on tetrahydropyr-
roloquinoline-containing natural products: syntheses of discorhabdin C, batzelline C and
isobatzelline C. Tetrahedron 50:2017–2028
74. Aubart KM, Heathcock CH (1999) A biomimetic approach to the discorhabdin alkaloids: total
syntheses of discorhabdins C and E and dethiadiscorhabdin D. J Org Chem 64:16–22
75. Grkovic T, Kaur B, Webbb VL, Copp BR (2006) Semi-synthetic preparation of the rare,
cytotoxic, deep-sea sourced sponge metabolites discorhabdins P and U. Bioorg Med Chem
Lett 16:1944–1946
76. Kita Y, Tohma H, Hatanaka K, Takada T, Fujita S, Mitoh S, Sakurai H, Oka S (1994)
Hypervalent iodine-induced nucleophilic substitution of para-substituted phenol ethers.
Generation of cation radicals as reactive intermediates. J Am Chem Soc 116:3684–3691
77. Kita Y, Egi M, Ohtsubo M, Saiki T, Okajima A, Takada T, Tohma H (1999) Hypervalent
iodine(III)-induced intramolecular cyclization reaction of substituted phenol ethers with an
alkyl azido side-chain: a novel and efficient synthesis of quinone imine derivatives. Chem
Pharm Bull 47:241–245
78. Kita Y, Egi M, Okajima A, Ohtsubo M, Takada T, Tohma H (1996) Hypervalent iodine(III)
induced intramolecular cyclization of substituted phenol ethers bearing an alkyl azido side-
chain – a novel synthesis of quinone imine ketals. Chem Commun 1491–1492
79. Kita Y, Egi M, Ohtsubo M, Saiki T, Takada T, Tohma H (1996) Novel and efficient synthesis
of sulfur-containing heterocycles using a hypervalent iodine(III) reagent. Chem Commun
2225–2226
80. Tohma H, Egi M, Ohtsubo M, Watanabe H, Takizawa S, Kita Y (1998) A novel and direct
a-azidation of cyclic sulfides using a hypervalent iodine(III) reagent. Chem Commun
173–174
81. Harayama Y, Yoshida M, Kamimura D, Kita Y (2005) The novel and efficient direct synthesis
of N,O-acetal compounds using a hypervalent iodine(III) reagent: an improved synthetic
method for a key intermediate of discorhabdins, Chem Commun 1764–1766
162 Y. Kita and H. Fujioka
82. Patel SP, Nadkarni DH, Murugesan S, King JR, Velu SE (2008) Azide-mediated detosylation
of N-tosylpyrroloiminoquinones and N-tosylindole-4,7-quinones. Synlett 2864–2868
83. Wada Y, Otani K, Endo N, Harayama Y, Kamimura D, Yoshida M, Fujioka H, Kita Y (2009)
Synthesis of antitumor marine alkaloid discorhabdin A oxa analogues. Org Lett 11:
4048–4050
Top Curr Chem (2012) 309: 163–202
DOI: 10.1007/128_2011_217
# Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011
Published online: 5 October 2011
M.G. Banwell (*), N.(Y.) Gao, B.D. Schwartz, and L.V. White
Research School of Chemistry, Institute of Advanced Studies, The Australian National University,
Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
e-mail: [email protected]
164 M.G. Banwell et al.
Contents
1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164
2 Colchicine, Imerubrine, Grandirubrine, Salimine and Jerusalemine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165
2.1 Colchicine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165
2.2 Imerubrine and Grandirubrine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167
2.3 Salimine and Jerusalemine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168
3 The Amaryllidaceae Alkaloids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170
3.1 Rhazinilam and Rhazinal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170
3.2 Lycorane and Lycorinine-Type Alkaloids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172
3.3 The Montanine Alkaloids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179
3.4 The Crinine Alkaloids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183
3.5 Galanthamine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188
3.6 The Narcissus Alkaloids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191
4 The Erythrina Alkaloids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193
5 Aspidospermidine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197
6 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199
7 Notes Added in Proof . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200
1 Introduction
In 1819 the German chemist Carl F.W. Meissner introduced the term alkaloid (or
“alkali-like”) but its widespread application as a descriptor of natural products
containing a basic nitrogen only occurred in the 1880s and after the publication of a
review article by O. Jacobsen in Albert Ladenburg’s Chemical Dictionary (see [1]).
Alkaloids, many of which are heterocyclic in nature and the by-products of amino
acid metabolism, occur most commonly in the peripheral parts of plants such as the
leaves, roots, bark and/or fruit and less so in the wood. Interestingly, significantly
reduced concentrations of alkaloids are encountered in terpene- and resin-rich
plants. In addition, because many alkaloids are neurotoxic they are not normally
encountered in large quantities in the terrestrially based animal kingdom [2]. In
contrast, the marine environment appears to contain many alkaloid-producing
animals including sponges, tunicates and nudibranchs (for useful points-of-entry
into the literature on marine alkaloids see [3, 4]).
Alkaloids and their derivatives, especially those of the morphinan class, have a
long history of therapeutic use and remain some of the most heavily prescribed
drugs on the market today. Such features, together with issues of supply and the
broad range of remarkable structural variations encountered amongst the more than
15,000 alkaloids described thus far, have made them attractive targets for synthesis
[5]. Indeed, the development of the discipline of chemical synthesis has been
profoundly influenced by the manifold challenges that these natural products have
presented (and continue to present) to the practitioners in the field. There are some
key milestones in the area worth highlighting to the reader. In 1886 Landenburg
reported the first complete synthesis of an alkaloid, namely coniine [(R)-2-propylpi-
peridine] (see [6]). This involved condensing 2-methylpyridine with acetaldehyde
Synthetic Studies on Amaryllidaceae and Other Terrestrially Derived Alkaloids 165
2.1 Colchicine
Colchicine (1, see Scheme 1 – associated axis of chirality not shown), which
embodies a tropolone ring system, is a phenethyltetrahydroisoquinoline-derived
alkaloid that was originally isolated from the meadow saffron Colchicum
autumnale [24]. It is a highly potent anti-mitotic agent that is used in the treatment
of liver cirrhosis and gout while its N-deacetyl congener, demecolcine, is a clini-
cally effective antineoplastic agent [25]. Its novel structural features and potent
biological activities have prompted numerous synthetic studies. However, a fully
regiocontrolled synthesis remained elusive for some time. The first synthesis of the
alkaloid, described by Eschenmoser and Schreiber in 1959 [12], highlighted two
key problems that were not solved simultaneously within the one reaction sequence
until our report in 1992. Site-selective introduction of the C-7 acetamido group
associated with target 1 had proven somewhat problematic although Nakamura,
166 M.G. Banwell et al.
O O OH OMe
MeO HO O O
NHAc NHAc NHAc NHAc
C C
7 methylating methylating
agent agent
MeO MeO MeO MeO
1 2a 2b 3
Scheme 1 Formation of colchicine (1) and isocolchicine (3) via O-methylation of colchiceine (2)
Woodward and Evans [14, 17, 18] advanced solutions to this matter during the
course of their studies. The second difficulty stemmed from the rapid equilibrium
between the two tautomeric forms, 2a and 2b, of colchiceine (10-demethyl-
colchicine), the free tropolone that is the final intermediate in all pre-1992 syntheses
(Scheme 1). As a result of this equilibrium, O-methylation of colchiceine affords a
ca. 1:1 mixture of colchicine and isocolchicine (3), the latter product differing from
1 in that the positions of the methoxy and carbonyl moieties (as well as the
associated double-bonds) in ring-C are reversed.
Our solution to these longstanding problems involved implementing a synthetic
sequence ([26, 27]; for a summary of more recent syntheses of colchicine see [28])
that mimicked the proposed biogenesis [29] of the troponoid C-ring of colchicine
(Scheme 2). Thus, the aryl bromide 4 was converted into the corresponding lithio-
species 5 under standard conditions and this was then treated with the aldehyde 6 to
give the alcohol 7. Deprotection of this last compound with tetra-n-butylammonium
fluoride (TBAF) and subjection of the resulting phenol (61% yield from 4) to
a Wessely-type oxidation with lead(IV) acetate afforded a diastereoisomeric
mixture of the expected o-benzoquinone monoketals that upon treatment with
trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) engaged in a cyclization reaction to form the dibenzocy-
cloheptane 8 (42% overall yield from 7). Treatment of compound 8 with thallium
(III) nitrate in the presence of methanol afforded the o-benzoquinone monoketal 9
(97%) that was subjected to nucleophilic cyclopropanation using the
Corey–Chaykovsky ylide and thus affording, in a completely regioselective man-
ner, the ring-fused cyclopropane 10 (75%). In the pivotal and presumably biomi-
metic step of the reaction sequence, compound 10, a s-homo-o-benzoquinone
monoketal, was treated with TFA in dichloromethane at room temperature. This
induced fragmentation of the three-membered ring and accompanying loss of the
elements of methanol so as to generate the troponoid 11 in 89% yield (at 53%
conversion). Clearly compound 11 embodies the required regiochemical arrange-
ment of the methoxy and carbonyl moieties within the C-ring and all that remained
was to convert the C-7 alcohol into the corresponding acetamido group. This was
readily effected by the illustrated sequence wherein the alcohol was transformed
into the corresponding mesylate 12 (100%) which was displaced with sodium azide
to give the azide 13 (85%). Reduction of the latter with dihydrogen in the presence
of palladium on carbon then gave the corresponding amine 14 that was immediately
subjected to reaction with acetic anhydride and so affording the racemic modifica-
tion of colchicine (1) in 73% overall yield from the precursor azide.
Synthetic Studies on Amaryllidaceae and Other Terrestrially Derived Alkaloids 167
OTBS
MeO
4 X = Br OTBS OH
n-BuLi
5 X = Li MeO MeO
(i) TBAF;
OH (ii) Pb(OAc)4; OH
+
MeO (iii) TFA MeO
O
MeO MeO MeO
MeO MeO
MeO
7 8
MeO
6
Tl(NO3)3,
MeOH
MeO O O O
MeO MeO
MeO MeO
X OH OH
TFA H2CSOMe2
MeO MeO MeO
11 X = OH 10 9
MsCl, Et3N
12 X = OMs
NaN3
13 X = N3
H2, Pd on C
14 X = NH2
Ac2O
1 X = NHAc
The protocols detailed above have proven effective in the regiospecific construction
of other natural products incorporating a tropolone O-methyl ether unit. For exam-
ple, treatment of the s-homo-o-benzoquinone monoketal 15 with TFA gave the
tropoloisoquinoline natural product imerubrine (16) in 70% yield ([27, 30, 31]; for
more recent syntheses of these alkaloids see [32]). Furthermore, the a-diketone, 17,
arising from hydrolysis of compound 15 underwent thermal rearrangement to afford
the related natural product grandirubrine (18) (87% from 15). Interestingly, when
168 M.G. Banwell et al.
compounds 16 and 18 were tested as tubulin binding agents only the former showed
any activity and this was much weaker than that observed for colchicine [30–32].
OMe OH
OMe O O O
MeO O O
N N N N
MeO MeO MeO MeO
OMe OMe OMe OMe
15 16 17 18
In 1991 Abu Zarga et al. described the isolation of the alkaloids salimine,
jerusalemine and suhailamine from the Middle Eastern species Colchicum
decaisnei Boiss. (Liliaceae) [33]. On the basis of various spectroscopic studies
structures 19–21, respectively,1,2 were assigned to these compounds. Given the
resemblance of these structures to the intermediate 8 associated with our biomi-
metic synthesis of colchicine (Scheme 2) we sought to adapt this work so as to
prepare compounds 19 and 20, on the basis that these might display the same types
of anti-mitotic properties shown by allocolchicine (22) (see footnote 2), a com-
pound that is readily obtained by the methoxide ion-induced ring-contraction of the
C-ring of colchicine and which is also encountered in nature.
OMe OMe CO2Me
HO2C HO
NHAc NHMe NHAc
MeO MeO MeO
MeO HO MeO
19 20 21 / 22
1
Each of these compounds presumably possesses an axis of chirality but the configurations of
these were not reported.
2
Abu Zarga et al. [33] assigned structure 21 to the alkaloid suhailamine without recognising that
this is also the structure of the well known colchicine derivative allocolchicine. Since the spectral
data derived from suhailamine do not match those recorded for allocolchicine, the structure
proposed for the former compound is presumed to be incorrect.
Synthetic Studies on Amaryllidaceae and Other Terrestrially Derived Alkaloids 169
OBn
MeO
O OH OMe
(i) NaOH; MeO MeO
23 (ii) H2, OH (i) Pb(OAc)4; OH
5 % Pd on C; (ii) TFA;
+ MeO MeO
(iii) NaBH4 (iii) (MeO)2SO2
CHO
MeO MeO
MeO OMe 25 26
24
(±)-19 30 27 R=OH
Tf2O
28 R=OTf CO, MeOH,
29 R=CO2Me Pd[0]
Scheme 3 Total synthesis of the structure, 19, assigned to the alkaloid salimine
The title alkaloids are a structurally diverse class of natural products that display a
remarkable range of biological properties. As a consequence, enormous effort
has been devoted to the synthesis of such compounds and the work reported in
this area over the last three to four decades has served as something of an indicator
of the state-of-the-art of synthesis at any given time.
Our own interest in the synthesis of the Amaryllidaceae alkaloids arose when
we recognised that, in common with colchicine (1), ()-rhazinilam (31) and
()-rhazinal (32) are both spindle toxins although their mode of action is different
in that, like Taxol™, they exert their biological effects by inhibiting the
depolymerisation of microtubules. This prompted us to develop syntheses
of these compounds and certain biogenetically related ones such as
(+)-epi-leuconolam (33) and ()-leuconolam (34) ([35, 36]; for an excellent and
very recent review on all of the reported syntheses of rhazinilam see [37]).
O O
NH NH
C
R O
D N X
N
31 R=H 33 X=α-OH
32 R=CHO 34 R=β-OH
The pivotal step associated with our approach to compounds 31–34 was an
organocatalysed, enantioselective and intramolecular Michael addition reaction of
the nucleophilic C-2 carbon of a pyrrole to an N-tethered a,b-unsaturated
aldehyde residue and thereby establishing the required CD-ring system. Full details
of the reaction sequence are shown in Scheme 4 and this involves initial reaction of
the potassium salt, 35, of pyrrole with butyrolactone (36) to give, after acidic work-
up, compound 37 (60–90%). Conversion of this last species into the corresponding
Weinreb amide 38 (87%) followed by its reaction with ethylmagnesium
bromide then afforded the ethyl ketone 39 (95%) that was subjected to standard
Horner–Wadsworth–Emmons (HWE) conditions and thereby generating the
Synthetic Studies on Amaryllidaceae and Other Terrestrially Derived Alkaloids 171
N
K
HWE
N N
35 heat then reaction
+ O
H3O
+
X
R
O
Weinreb amide 37 X=OH 40 R=CO2Me
38 X=N(OMe)Me DIBAl-H
formation
EtMgBr 41 R=CH2OH
O 39 X=Et BaMnO4
42 R=CHO
36
MacMillan's
1st gen. catalyst
Y
(i) KOH then HCl;
MeO2C (ii) DCC, MeOH NaBH4
X X O
N N N
2-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3-2-
dioxaborolan-2-yl)benzenamine, Pd[0],
Na2CO3
NH2
(i) KOH then HCl;
(ii) EDCI, DMAP O PCC O
NH NH
MeO2C CHO
N R O
N N
X
50 32 R=CHO
(Ph3P)3RhCl 33 X=α-OH
31 R=H 34 X=β-OH
The lycorine alkaloids, of which lycorine (51) is the parent member [40], as well as
the biogenetically related lycorinine alkaloids, as represented by clividine (52) [41]
and narseronine (53) [42], constitute two further types of Amaryllidaceae alkaloids
that have attracted our attention. They display an extraordinary range of biological
effects including a pronounced capacity to selectively inhibit the growth of various
cancer cells, DNA binding properties, anti-viral activity, anti-fungal behaviour and
insect anti-feedant activity [42]. Despite this, there has been remarkably little effort
to develop syntheses of members of either of these two classes or analogues thereof.
Accordingly, we sought to establish practical routes to these systems and two
distinct approaches emerged from our studies in the area. The first of these is
highlighted in our syntheses of the ()-, ()-, and (+)-forms of the g-lycorane
[54 – representing (+)-form] [43], the latter two having been obtained
through degradation of lycorine as part of the work associated with establishing
its structure.
The details of our syntheses of these three forms of g-lycorane are presented in
Scheme 5. Thus, the known allylic acetate 55 was reacted with bromoform and sodium
Synthetic Studies on Amaryllidaceae and Other Terrestrially Derived Alkaloids 173
ring and intramolecular trapping of the ensuing p-allyl cation by the nitrogen of the
pendant carbamate. In this way the hexahydroindole 60 was obtained in 95% yield.
Compound 60 readily engaged in a Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling reaction with
arylboronic acid 61 and thereby affording the expected product 62 in 87% yield.
Catalytic hydrogenation of alkene 62 proceeded in a completely facially selective
manner to give the C7-arylated perhydroindole 63 (quant.) that was then subjected to
treatment with phosphorus oxytrichloride and so effecting a Bischler–Napieralski
cyclisation reaction to give the lactam 64 (81%). Upon reduction with lithium
aluminium hydride this lactam provided ()-g-lycorane [()-54] in 84% yield.
This reaction sequence was readily modified so as to allow for the synthesis of
the (+)- and ()-forms of g-lycorane. Thus, by reacting the amine arising from the
reduction of the a,b-unsaturated nitriles 58 with ()-menthyl chloroformate,
treating the resulting diastereoisomeric carbamates with silver acetate and cross-
coupling the ensuing mixture of hexahydroindoles with aryl boronic acid 61, the
chromatographically separable C7-arylated hexahydroindoles 65 and 66 could be
obtained. These were then readily elaborated, using the same protocols as specified
in Scheme 5, to the (+)- and ()-enantiomeric forms, respectively, of the target
compound 54.
Swern oxidation conditions, using an excess of DMSO and oxalyl chloride, the
keto-ester 96 was obtained in 48% yield. The formation of the methylthiomethyl
ester moiety in this reaction is presumably the result of the intervention of a
Pummerer-type rearrangement reaction. Treatment of compound 96 with Pd
(PPh3)4 and an excess of dimedone resulted in the removal of the Alloc protecting
group and formation of the secondary amine 97 which underwent a spontaneous
intramolecular hetero-Michael addition to the pendant enone moiety with the
ensuing enolate attacking the adjacent ester carbonyl and, after the usual addi-
tion/elimination reaction, delivering the unsaturated lactone 53 in 67% yield. The
spectral data obtained on compound 53 were in full accord with the assigned
structure that was eventually confirmed by a single-crystal X-ray analysis. Further-
more, there was excellent agreement between the spectral data recorded for com-
pound 53 and those reported for naturally-derived narseronine.
The route used in the conversion 100 ! ent-98 is shown in Scheme 10 and
begins with the conversion of the former compound into the acetal 101 under
standard conditions. Dihydroxylation of the non-chlorinated double-bond within
the latter compound using the Upjohn conditions [50] provided the diol 102
(66%) in a completely diastereoselective fashion and this was protected as the
corresponding di-MOM ether 103 (88%) using MOM chloride in the presence of
sodium hydride. Reductive cleavage of the acetal unit within compound 103 was
readily effected in a regioselective manner with DIBAl-H and the ensuing alcohol
180 M.G. Banwell et al.
104 (60%) was then converted into the corresponding (inverted) iodide 105 (66%)
using triiodoimidazole in the presence of triphenylphosphine. Reductive
deiodination of this last compound with tri-n-butyltin hydride (to give tris-ether
Synthetic Studies on Amaryllidaceae and Other Terrestrially Derived Alkaloids 181
106) followed by selective cleavage of the PMB ether with DDQ then gave alcohol
107 (83% from 105) that was converted into the epimeric azide 108 (75%) under
Mitsunobu conditions. Subjection of compound 108 to a Staudinger reaction
then gave the corresponding amine 109 (98%) which participated in a reductive
amination reaction with p-methoxybenzaldehyde in the presence of sodium
cyanoborohydride. The resulting secondary amine 110 (56%) was coupled with
the racemic modification of the readily prepared acid 111 and the diastereoisomeric
forms of amide 112 (74%) so produced were subjected to reaction with tri-n-
butyltin hydride. This resulted in homolytic cleavage of the PhS group and the
ensuing benzylic radical then added, in an intramolecular fashion, to the nearer
terminus of the chlorinated double bond, thereby generating a new radical that
“collapses” with ejection of a chlorine radical, so as to produce the annulated and
b,g-unsaturated lactam 113 in 60% yield. Compound 113 was accompanied by
smaller amounts (7%) of its C3-epimer. Treatment of lactam 113 with a combina-
tion of LiAlH4 and AlCl3 resulted in the reductive removal of the carbonyl group
and formation of tertiary amine 114 (94%), the MOM groups within which were
removed on treatment with acidic methanol. The ensuing diol 115 (73%) was
treated with triphosgene, resulting in the simultaneous generation of a cyclic
carbonate unit and cleavage of the PMB group, thus leading to the carbamoyl
chloride 116. Exposure of this last compound to aqueous acid then afforded the
secondary amine 117 (42% from 115) that readily engaged in a Pictet–Spengler
reaction on treatment with paraformaldehyde in formic acid, thereby generating
compound 118 (65%) that embodies the polycyclic framework associated with the
target alkaloid. Indeed, simply treating this cyclic carbonate with potassium
hydroxide in methanol gave ent-brunsvigine (ent-98) in 87% yield that, save for
the sign of the specific rotation, was spectroscopically identical, in all respects, with
the natural product.
We have extended the chemistry shown in Scheme 10 to the preparation of
ent-nangustine (ent-99) and to the synthesis of compound 119 that corresponds
to the structure assigned to montabuphine [51]. Montabuphine has attracted con-
siderable attention because its isolation suggested that both enantiomeric forms of
the montanine alkaloid framework occur in nature. In the event, and by employing a
reaction sequence similar to that shown above, we were able to prepare target 119
from cis-1,2-dihydrocatechol 100. However, a comparison of the physical and
spectral data recorded on the synthesised form of amine 119 with those reported
for (+)-montabuphine suggests that they are different compounds.
182 M.G. Banwell et al.
Scheme 11 Synthesis of the basic pentacyclic framework, 103, associated with the montanine
alkaloids
Synthetic Studies on Amaryllidaceae and Other Terrestrially Derived Alkaloids 183
The crinine alkaloids, which can embody either enantiomeric form of the 2,3,
4,4a-tetrahydro-1H-6H-5,10b-ethanophenanthridine framework, represent an
important sub-class within the Amaryllidaceae alkaloid family [53]. Many
members of this subclass display interesting biological properties including
immuno-stimulatory, cytotoxic and anti-malarial activities. As a consequence,
they have been the subject of numerous synthetic studies [53].
The key substructure associated with such systems is a C3a-arylpolyhydroindole
residue and, as shown in the three examples presented below, upon subjection of
such species to a Pictet–Spengler reaction the full tetracyclic framework of the
crinine alkaloids is established. Accordingly, this approach has been widely
adopted in establishing total syntheses of such natural products. Our syntheses of
the racemic modifications of maritinamine (132), epi-maritinamine (133) and
haemultine (134) as well as ent-amabiline (135) (Gao et al., unpublished work;
[54], [55]) serve to highlight three quite distinct approaches to the C3a-arylpolyhy-
droindole substructure. Two of these approaches exploit ring-fused gem-dihalogen-
ocyclopropanes as early or mid-stage intermediates.
The synthetic route used to access the alkaloids 132 and 133 is shown in
Scheme 12 [54] and begins with conversion of the readily available b-arylated
cyclopentenone 136 into the corresponding allylic acetate 137 (98%) that was
subjected to an Ireland–Claisen rearrangement reaction, thereby affording
the propionic acid derivative 138 (83%). Conversion of this last compound, via
dehydration of the derived primary amine, into the corresponding nitrile 139
provided the substrate for a dichlorocarbene addition reaction that delivered a ca.
1:1 diastereoisomeric mixture of the ring-fused cyclopropane 140 (38%). Reduc-
tion of the nitrile group within the last compound, protection of the resulting
184 M.G. Banwell et al.
primary amine as the corresponding tert-butyl carbamate 141 (75%) and treatment
of this with silver tetrafluoroborate resulted in electrocyclic ring-opening of the three-
membered ring followed by intramolecular trapping of the ensuing p-allyl cation by
the pendant nitrogen and thus generating the desired C3a-arylated hexahydroindole
142 (65–75%). Treatment of compound 142 under Bouveault–Blanc-type reduction
conditions and subjection of the ensuing dechlorinated olefin 143 (98%) to a regio- but
non-stereocontrolled oxymercuration/demercuration protocol provided a chromato-
graphically separable mixture of alcohols 144 (25%) and 145 (71%). Independent
subjection of each of compounds 144 and 145 to reaction with paraformaldehyde in
the presence of formic acid resulted in cleavage of the carbamate residues and a
subsequent Pictet–Spengler reaction gave, after work-up with potassium carbonate
(of the resulting secondary amine), the required pentacyclic species 146 (72%) and
147 (58%), respectively. Treatment of each of these with boron trichloride resulted
in selective cleavage of the isopropyl ether residues and the formation of the target
crinines 132 (70%) and 133 (70%), respectively.
Synthetic Studies on Amaryllidaceae and Other Terrestrially Derived Alkaloids 185
Scheme 13 Total synthesis of the racemic form of the structure assigned to haemultine (134)
(TBAF) gave the allylic alcohol 162 (94%). Subjection of compound 162 to an
Eschenmoser–Claisen rearrangement using N,N-dimethylacetamide dimethylacetal
in toluene afforded the expected amide 163 (95%) that upon treatment with lithium
triethylborohydride gave the primary alcohol 164 (94%) which was transformed, by
standard methods, into the corresponding azide 165 (85%). Conversion of the PMB
ether moiety within compound 165 into the corresponding mesylate 166 followed
by Staudinger reduction of the azide residue within this last compound presumably
Synthetic Studies on Amaryllidaceae and Other Terrestrially Derived Alkaloids 187
gave the corresponding primary amine but this immediately engaged in an intra-
molecular SN0 reaction and thereby affording the C3a-arylhexahydroindole 167
(64%). Treatment of the last compound treatment with paraformaldehyde in the
188 M.G. Banwell et al.
presence of formic acid effected a Pictet–Spengler reaction and thus forming the
(bis)-formate ester 168. The target 135 was finally generated, in 65% overall yield
from 167, by treating compound 168 with dihydrogen in the presence of palladium
on carbon and potassium carbonate, thereby effecting both ester hydrolysis and
hydrogenation of the D-ring double bond.
3.5 Galanthamine
The alkaloid galanthamine (169) has been obtained from various Amaryllidaceae
species including daffodils, the red spider lily (Lycoris radiata) and the Caucasian
snowdrop (Galanthus woronowii). Its effectiveness as a centrally acting, selective,
reversible and competitive inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase has resulted in
galanthamine being introduced into the clinic in both the USA and Europe for the
symptomatic treatment of mild to moderate forms of Alzheimer’s disease [57].
These and various other intriguing features of this alkaloid have prompted exten-
sive synthetic studies of it [57].
The outcomes of our own efforts in the area [58], which have led to a synthesis of
the non-natural enantiomeric form of galanthamine (i.e. ent-169), are shown in
Schemes 15 and 16. Once again, the reaction sequence starts with the versatile cis-
1,2-dihydrocatechol 67 which is converted, using the well-established two-step
protocol shown in the first part of Scheme 6, into epoxide 69. Treatment of the latter
compound with acetic acid in the presence of phosphoric acid gave a trans-diol
mono-acetate that upon treatment with MOM-Cl afforded the anticipated and fully
protected compound 170 (74% from 69). Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling of the
product of acetate hydrolysis, namely cyclohexenyl bromide 171, with the readily
prepared arylboronic acid 172 afforded the expected cross-coupling product 173
(94%) that was subjected to a Mitsunobu inversion process, thus delivering, after
hydrolysis of the intermediate a-chloroacetate, the epimeric alcohol 174 (93%).
The latter compound readily participated in the same type of Eschenmoser–Claisen
rearrangement reaction used in the conversion 162 ! 163 (Scheme 14), thereby
affording amide 175 (89%) incorporating the critical quaternary carbon-centre
associated with the target natural product. Treatment of compound 175 with
molecular bromine in a mixture of toluene and acetone afforded, via a bromonium
ion-mediated cyclisation, the furannulated compound 176 (93%) that was readily
debrominated upon exposure to dihydrogen in the presence of palladium on
carbon and potassium carbonate. Acetylation of the ensuing alcohol 177 (68%)
Synthetic Studies on Amaryllidaceae and Other Terrestrially Derived Alkaloids 189
under standard conditions afforded ester 178 (90%) that was subjected to acetonide
hydrolysis using aqueous acetic acid. The ensuing diol was converted into the
corresponding thiocarbonate 179 (94%) that was, in turn, subjected to a Corey–Winter
190 M.G. Banwell et al.
conditions used for the conversion 197 ! 198 then afforded the second targeted
analogue, namely the triacetate 202 (59%).
A distinctly different approach to the Narcissus alkaloids is shown in Scheme 19
[62, 63] and started with the ever-useful cis-1,2-dihydrocatechol 67 that was first
converted into the PMP-acetal 203 (85%) under standard conditions.
Dihydroxylation of diene 203 under the Upjohn [50] conditions afforded diol 204
that was then converted into the (bis)-MOM ether 205 (59% from 203). Reductive
cleavage of the acetal moiety within the last compound could be accomplished
using DIBAl-H and the alcohol 206 (84%) so formed was protected as the
corresponding MOM ether 207 (90%). DDQ-mediated cleavage of the PMB ether
unit within this last compound then gave the mono-ol 208 (95%) that was subjected
to an Overman rearrangement reaction and thereby giving the corresponding
acetamide (65%). This was then cleaved to the corresponding amine 209 (89%)
by treatment with DIBAl-H. Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling of this last compound
with the readily available arylboronic acid 210 afforded, after spontaneous
lactamisation of the intermediate amino-ester, the (tris)-MOM ether 211 (83%)
of the non-natural enantiomer of lycoricidine. Treatment of compound 211 with
Synthetic Studies on Amaryllidaceae and Other Terrestrially Derived Alkaloids 193
TMS-Br effected exhaustive cleavage of MOM ethers and thus afforded ent-
lycoricidine (ent-187) (62%) the structure of which was confirmed through a
single-crystal X-ray analysis of the derived triacetate.
A simple modification of the reaction sequence shown above has allowed
for the synthesis of ent-narciclasine (ent-188). Thus, as shown in Scheme 20,
Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling of the previously prepared 2-bromocyclohex-
2-enamine 209 with the readily synthesised aryl boronic acid 212 afforded the
expected lactam 213 (63%). Once again, treatment of the last compound with TMS-
Br resulted in exhaustive cleavage of the MOM ether residues and, this time, the
formation of the target compound ent-188 (48%).
Compounds ent-187 and ent-188, as well as several analogues available using
chemistry similar to that shown in Schemes 19 and 20, have been evaluated for their
cytotoxic effects in a 13-member human cancer cell-line panel and found to be only
weakly active [64]. In contrast, an authentic sample of the natural enantiomeric
form of narciclasine (188) was found to be highly active in the same screens.
The Erythrina alkaloids represent a group of natural products isolated from various
species of plants of the same name and found in tropical and sub-tropical regions of
the world. They are all spirocyclic isoquinoline alkaloids and found in all parts of
194 M.G. Banwell et al.
the source plants. Various substructural types are encountered within the class, the
most common of which are represented by erysodine (214) (an erythrinadiene) and
erythratine (215) (an erythrinene) that differ, inter alia, in the degrees and
arrangements of unsaturation within the five-membered and cyclohexane rings
[65]. These types of alkaloids exhibit a range of fascinating properties including
curare-like activities, as well as hypotensive, diuretic, laxative, sedative and CNS-
depressive properties. Not surprisingly, then, they have been the subjects of numer-
ous synthetic studies. Our own efforts in the area have focussed on the synthesis of
the non-natural enantiomer of erythramine (216) ([66]; for a summary of other
synthetic endeavours in this area see [67]). As with a number of the studies
described above, the underpinning technology used in obtaining ent-erythramine
is the electrocyclic ring-opening of a ring-fused gem-dihalocyclopropane and
trapping of the ensuing p-allyl cation by a pendant nucleophile.
with ethylene oxide and the resulting amino-alcohol, the structure of which was
confirmed by X-ray analysis, was treated with molecular iodine triphenyl-
phosphine and imidazole. The iodide 226 (44%) so formed was reacted with tri-
n-butyltin hydride and AIBN and thereby inducing a radical addition/elimination
sequence analogous to that involved during the conversion 112 ! 113
(Scheme 10) with the result that ent-erythramine (ent-216) was generated in
89% yield. The biological evaluation of this compound and related ones is
currently underway.
Synthetic Studies on Amaryllidaceae and Other Terrestrially Derived Alkaloids 197
5 Aspidospermidine
The Aspidosperma alkaloids are a group of more than 100 monomeric and dimeric
monoterpene indole alkaloids with aspidospermidine (228) representing a key
member of the class and sometimes considered to be the parent [68]. Numerous
total syntheses of this pentacyclic compound have been reported. Our own
contributions in the area were prompted by the discovery of a new method for
preparing indoles via a palladium-catalysed Ullmann cross-coupling reaction that
proceeds especially efficiently at close to room temperature [69] and which we felt
could serve as the centrepiece in developing a new synthesis of compound 228 and,
in the longer term, syntheses of dimeric members of the indole alkaloid class such
as the clinically significant alkaloids vinblastine and vincristine.
The early to middle stages of the route that we have used in synthesising target
228 are shown in Scheme 22 ([70]; for a summary of other synthetic endeavours
in this area see [71]) and involve the initial conversion of commercially available
3-ethoxycyclohexenone (229) into 3-ethylcyclohexenone (230) (89%) by standard
methods. Sodium borohydride-mediated reduction of the latter compound and
acetylation of the resulting allylic alcohol gave the allylic acetate 231 (96%) that
readily engaged in an Ireland–Claisen rearrangement to give the carboxylic acid 232
(62%) incorporating the quaternary carbon centre required in the final target. Chain
extension of compound 232 was achieved by first reducing the carboxylic acid
residue to the corresponding alcohol 233 (96%), oxidising this to the aldehyde
followed by engaging that in a Wittig reaction with (methoxymethylene)triphenyl-
phosphorane to give the enol ether 234 (92%). Compound 234 was then converted,
over two simple steps, into the alcohol 235 (84%) representing the higher homo-
logue of compound 233. Acetylation of compound 235 followed by an allylic
oxidation using a mixture of Cr(CO)6 and t-BuOOH gave the corresponding enone
(65%) that, in anticipation of the foreshadowed Pd[0]-catalysed Ullmann reaction,
was subjected to a Johnson-type a-iodination reaction using molecular iodine in
the presence of pyridine. The a-iodoenone 236 (quant.) so formed was subjected
to reaction with o-nitroiodobenzene (237) in the presence of copper powder and
Pd[0]. This afforded the cross-coupled product 238 (75%). The acetate residue
within compound 238 was converted, over three very conventional and reliable
steps, into the corresponding azide 239 (87%) and heating of this in refluxing
benzene resulted in the intramolecular 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of the azide residue
onto the pendant enone followed by extrusion of dinitrogen from the resulting
triazoline to give the ring-fused aziridine 240 (72%). Treatment of this last
198 M.G. Banwell et al.
compound with HCl then afforded the a-chloroenone 241 (as its hydrochloride salt).
Reaction of compound 241 with titanium trichloride (in the form of its THF solvate)
resulted in reductive dechlorination and reductive cyclisation reactions and thereby
generating indole 242 (46% from 240).
Synthetic Studies on Amaryllidaceae and Other Terrestrially Derived Alkaloids 199
6 Conclusion
References
Contents
1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204
2 Synthesis of Pyrrole Alkaloids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205
2.1 Silver-Catalyzed Cyclization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205
2.2 Gold-Catalyzed Cyclization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209
2.3 Copper-Catalyzed Cyclization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209
2.4 Cyclizations Catalyzed by Other Metals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210
3 Synthesis of Carbazole Alkaloids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211
3.1 Iron-Mediated Synthesis of Carbazoles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211
3.2 Palladium-Catalyzed Synthesis of Carbazoles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222
4 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 248
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 248
Abbreviations
1 Introduction
has been developed. The present chapter also summarizes recent progress and
applications from our laboratories as an update of previous reviews [19, 24, 25].
AgOAc
–
– AcOH
OAc
[Ag]+
R2 –
OAc
R2
N 3
R N+ R3
R1 H
H R1
H+ – [AgH]
[Ag] [Ag]
H
–OAc
H
R2 N R3
R2 N+ R3 Ag + 0.5 H2
–
R1 OAc
R1
BF3•OEt2 AgOAc
NH
N
SiMe3 N 77 %
N BrMg H
H SiMe3
68 %
4 5
N H2, Rh/C N
N 88 % N
H H
6 (±)-7 (±)-harmicine
1. BrMg
OMe OMe SiMe3
p-TsNH2 2. TBAF OMe cat. AgOAc
CHO
N
94 % 66 % NH 88 %
Ts
Ts
15 16 17
Br Br
HO
OMe 1. KOt-Bu OH Br
2. Na2S Py•HBr•Br2
N Br
N 73 % N 59 % H
H
Ts
Br
18 19 20 pentabromopseudilin
OMe Cl
OMe
1. NCS HO Cl
Cl CHO Cl Cl
5 steps 2. BBr3
N N Cl
H 64 % H
29 %
Cl Cl Cl
21 22 23 pentachloropseudilin
• cat. Ag(I)
NH or N
PG
cat. Au(I) PG
24 25
Gold has become very popular as catalyst in organic synthesis in recent years (for
reviews, see [10, 12, 15, 46]). Gold catalysis has also been investigated for construc-
tion of the pyrrole ring system. In analogy to the silver(I)-catalyzed process described
above, the hydroamination of a-aminoallenes 24 to substituted D3-pyrrolines 25 has
also been catalyzed by gold(I) salts (Scheme 7). The active catalyst in this process is
probably a gold(I) species, even when gold(III) salts are employed as precatalysts
[47]. The cycloisomerization of N-allyl-N-propargylamines, which can be achieved
with silver(I) catalysts (see above) [44], has also been studied using gold(I) catalysis.
This gold-catalyzed process provided 3-alkylidene-4-vinylpyrrolidines which can
potentially be transformed to pyrroles [48]. The gold(I)-catalyzed ring expansion
of 2-alkynyl-3-aryl-1-tosylaziridines afforded 2,5-disubstituted 1-tosylpyrroles
[49, 50]. Pale et al. carried out this reaction with cyclohexane-fused aziridines to
furnish 4,5,6,7-tetrahydroindoles [51]. 1-Aminopent-4-en-2-ynes undergo a gold(I)-
catalyzed cyclization to give 2-substituted 4-methylpyrroles [52]. Cyclization of
1-amino-3-alkyn-2-ols using a combination of (triphenylphosphane)gold(I) chloride
with either silver(I) bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide or silver(I) triflate as catalytic
system provided substituted pyrroles [53]. Toste et al. reported a gold(I)-catalyzed
cyclization of homopropargyl azides 26 to substituted pyrroles 27 (Scheme 8) [54].
R
R
cat. Au[I] (or Zn[II] or Pt[IV])
N
N3 H
26 27
X cat. Cu(I) R
R
H2N–Boc N
Boc
28 29
The same group has also developed an efficient Cu-catalyzed method for the
reaction of 1,4-dihalo-1,3-dienes with tert-butyl carbamate to afford N-Boc-pyrroles
[56]. A similar cyclizing amidation of 1,4-diiodo-1,3-dienes with primary amides
led to di- or trisubstituted N-acylpyrroles in good yields using copper(I) iodide as
catalyst [57]. A double copper(I)-catalyzed vinylation of N,N0 -bis-Boc-hydrazine
afforded N,N0 -bis-Boc-N,N0 -divinylhydrazines. Thermally induced [3,3] sigmatro-
pic rearrangement of these intermediates followed by cyclization provided unsym-
metrically substituted pyrroles [58]. 1,2,5-Triarylpyrroles have been obtained by
copper(I) chloride-catalyzed addition of arylamines to 1,4-diarylbuta-1,3-diynes
[59]. Oxidative cyclization of b-amino-a,b-enones or b-amino-a,b-enoates with
dialkyl acetylenedicarboxylates catalyzed by copper(I) iodide in the presence of
oxygen afforded a variety of persubstituted pyrroles [60]. Cu(II)-catalyzed 1,4-
addition of ethyl acetoacetate or acetylacetone to a-ethoxycarbonylvinyl azides
and subsequent cyclocondensation provided 2,3,4,5-tetrasubstituted pyrroles [61].
This section covers cyclizations to the pyrrole nucleus catalyzed by other metals
(Ti, Mn, Ru, Pd, Pt, Zn, In). Dembinski and co-workers used zinc(II) chloride as
ligand-free catalyst for the microwave-assisted cyclization of homopropargyl
azides 26 to afford substituted pyrroles 27 (Scheme 8) [62]. A similar methodology
for the synthesis of 2,4,5-trisubstituted pyrroles was described by Driver et al.
employing substituted 1-azidobuta-1,3-dienes in a cyclization reaction using cata-
lytic amounts of zinc(II) iodide [63]. A three-component zinc-catalyzed one-pot
cyclization of aromatic and aliphatic propargylic acetates, silyl enol ethers,
and primary amines to substituted pyrroles has been described by Zhan et al.
The reaction sequence includes propargylation of the silyl enol ether, amination,
5-exo-dig-cyclization, and isomerization [64]. Hiroya and co-workers have shown
Synthesis of Pyrrole and Carbazole Alkaloids 211
R R′
R R′
+ +
(OC)3Fe
− H2N N
BF4
H
30 (R = H) 31 32
Fe(CO)5 Ph3C+BF4–
+
(OC)3Fe (OC)3Fe
cat. 1-azadiene 98 %
99 % BF4–
33 34 30
+ OR
(OC)3Fe
+
−
BF4 H2N
30 35
electrophilic (R = alkyl)
substitution
(OC)3Fe
OR
H2N
36
H OR (OC)3Fe
(OC)3Fe O
oxidative oxidizing
cyclization agent, e.g.: H N HN
H 38
+ v.a. MnO2 oxidative
aromatization 37 v.a. MnO2
I2, pyridine cyclization
+ Cp2Fe+PF6–, Na2CO3
demetalation H O
oxidation 1. Me3NO (OC)3Fe
(aromatization) 2. Pd / C
+ or H N 39
demetalation NBS demetalation
+ Me3NO
aromatization
OR OR OH
N N N
H H H
40 40 41
Hyellazole (44) and 6-chlorohyellazole (46) were isolated from the blue-green alga
Hyella caespitosa [110]. They represent the first carbazole alkaloids obtained from
marine sources. Hyellazole (44) and 6-chlorohyellazole (46) were both synthesized
starting from the iron complex salt 30 and arylamine 42 (Scheme 13) [111]. The
arylamine 42 is available from 2,6-dimethoxytoluene in five steps and 76% overall
yield. Complex salt 30 and arylamine 42 react in an electrophilic substitution to
complex 43. Three different reagents have been found to accomplish the oxidative
cyclization of complex 43. The quinone imine cyclization of 43 by sequential
application of manganese dioxide, very active manganese dioxide, and trimethyla-
mine N-oxide followed by O-methylation provided hyellazole (44) in five steps and
57% yield based on 30 [97]. A more efficient oxidative cyclization of complex 43
was achieved with ferrocenium hexafluorophosphate in the presence of sodium
carbonate to give hyellazole (44) in 59% yield along with 29% of the corresponding
tricarbonyliron-complexed dihydrocarbazol-3-one. The latter could be transformed
to hyellazole (44) on treatment with trimethylamine N-oxide and subsequent
methylation to contribute to an overall yield of 83% based on 30 [97]. More
recently, a third strategy has been reported for the oxidative cyclization of 43
using N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) to give hyellazole (44) in 69% yield [111].
Electrophilic bromination with the same reagent in the presence of catalytic
amounts of hydrobromic acid provides 6-bromohyellazole (45) in 92% yield.
1. Cp2FePF6, Na2CO3
2. a) Me3NO
-
BF4 OMe (OC)3Fe b) MeI
MeOH OMe 84 %
(OC)3Fe + + or
H2N Me 82 °C
98 % H2N Me NBS, Na2CO3
C6H5 69 %
30 42 43 C6H5
1. NBS, Na2CO3
2. NBS, cat. HBr
69 %
OMe O
Ph3C+BF4– BF4– MeO H2O, Δ
MeO
+
(OC)3Fe + (OC)3Fe+ (OC)3Fe +
BF4– BF4–
51 52 52 53 Fe(CO)3
BF4– MeO
Me (OC)3Fe iodine, pyridine
(OC)3Fe +
+ MeCN, rt Me
H2N OMe 76 % 68 %
OMe H2N OMe
52 54 55
Me CHO CHO
DDQ BBr3
MeO OMe MeO OMe HO OH
N 67 % 68 % N
N
H H H
56 57 7-methoxy- 58 clausine O
MnO2, KCN, MeOH O-methylmukonal
100 %
COOMe COOH
KOH
MeO OMe MeO OMe
N EtOH N
H 53 % H
59 clausine H 60 clausine K
(clauszoline-C) (clauszoline-J)
[Fe]
CHO
[Fe(CO)3] Me
HO O + OEt
H2N O
N MeO
H OEt
61 furoclausine-A 48 62
BrCH2CH(OEt)2
Me
O2N OH
63
Me OEt MeO
BF4–
O (OC)3Fe
OEt MeCN Me
(OC)3Fe+ +
25 °C OEt
H2N O
OMe 87 %
NH2 OEt
52 62 64
Me Me
iodine, pyridine, Δ amberlyst 15
OEt
MeO O MeO O
71 % N C6H5Cl, Δ N
OEt 82 %
H H
65 66
CHO CHO
DDQ BBr3
MeO O HO O
43 % 41 %
N N
H H
67 61 furoclausine-A
O O
O
N
HN N H
OH HN H
OH
Me Me
N
H R N
H R
O
O
N
N H
HN H OH
OMe
[Fe(CO)3] O O
Me + + O2N
H2N Me N N N
N H H H
H R
R 69 33 70 71
[Fe]
Sonogashira–Hagihara
cat. Pd(0) OMe
+ H R′
H2N Me
OTf
72 73
OMe
BF4– (OC)3Fe
Me MeCN OMe Cp2FePF6, Na2CO3
+
(OC)3Fe +
R 82 °C H2N Me 63–96 %
89–100 %
NH2 R
30 70 74
H2N AcHN
OMe OMe
H2, Pd / C AcCl 180 °C
77 Me Me
92–100 % N 81–97 % 100 %
N
R R
Boc Boc
78 79
AcHN AcHN
OMe OH
BBr3
Me Me 68a antiostatin A1 R = (CH2)4CH3
N 65–94 % N 68b antiostatin A2 R = (CH2)2CH(CH3)CH2CH3
H R H R
68c antiostatin A3 R = (CH2)4CH(CH3)2
80 68 68d antiostatin A4 R = (CH2)6CH3
O O
O2N H2N O2N
OMe OMe N N N
180 °C H2, Pd / C H H H
77
100 % Me Me 83–91 %
82–100 %
N N
H R H R
81 82
O O
O O
N N
N H N H
HN H BBr3 HN H
OMe OH
74–94 %
Me Me 69a antiostatin B2 R = (CH2)5CH3
N N 69b antiostatin B3 R = (CH2)4CH(CH3)2
H R H R 69c antiostatin B4 R = (CH2)6CH3
83 69 69d antiostatin B5 R = (CH2)5CH(CH3)2
HO AcO
OMe Br OMe
[Ni]
+
Me Me Br
[Ni] N OH N OAc
H H
[Fe] 85 86
84
(R)-(–)-neocarazostatin B
[Fe(CO)3]
OAc
OAc
OMe
OMe
+ O
+
H2N Me
H2 N Me OAc
Br
87 88 89 33
transformed into carquinostatin A (93) [103]. Thus, we could prove our assumption
by comparison of the optical rotation value of our synthetic compound with that of
the natural product. The synthetic strategy is related to our previous syntheses
of carquinostatin A (93) [101, 102, 104] and lavanduquinocin [106]. We projected
to introduce the prenyl side chain at the carbazole framework by a nickel-mediated
prenylation (Scheme 22). The carbazole skeleton should derive from the arylamine
89 and cyclohexa-1,3-diene (33) by an iron-mediated oxidative coupling under air.
The 2-hydroxypropyl side chain should be attached to the aromatic amine 87 by
lithiation and subsequent reaction with (R)-propene oxide (88).
The arylamine 89 was obtained in eight steps and 65% overall yield starting from
guaiacol. This precursor enables one to differentiate between the oxy substituents at
C-3 and C-4 of the carbazole. The chiral side chain is introduced by regioselective
bromination, halogenmetal exchange, and subsequent reaction with (R)-propene
oxide (88). Reaction of the highly functionalized arylamine 89 with the iron
complex salt 30 in acetonitrile in air afforded complex 90 in 68% yield (Scheme 23)
[103]. This transformation combines electrophilic aromatic substitution and oxida-
tive cyclization (mode B in Scheme 12). The oxidative cyclization of similar
systems by air in acidic medium was reported by us previously for the synthesis
of the carbazole alkaloids mukonine and mukonidine [137, 138]. The one-pot
electrophilic substitution and oxidative cyclization was reported first in the course
of the synthesis of carbazoquinocin C [99]. In this case, the acidic conditions are
provided by tetrafluoroboric acid, which is released during the electrophilic substi-
tution. Aromatization and concomitant demetalation of 90 was achieved by treat-
ment with N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) under basic reaction conditions to furnish
222 I. Bauer and H.-J. Kn€
olker
OAc
AcO
OMe OMe
BF4– MeCN (OC)3Fe NBS
+ + H2N Me
(OC)3Fe Me Na2CO3
air, 25 °C N OAc
OAc H 100 %
68 %
30 89 90
HO OMe O
O
LiAlH4 CAN
Me Me
92 % 92 %
N OH N OH
H H
84 (R)-(–)-neocarazostatin B 93 carquinostatin A
R R′
R R′
cat. Pd(0) R R′ Pd(II)
+
N N
X NH2 H H
94 31 95 32
R R′
N
H Pd(II) Cu(I) O2 (air)
95
+ 2 H+
N
H
32
Åkermark–Knölker
cat. Pd(II) Negishi
HO cat. Zr(IV)
OH COOMe
OMe
cat. Pd
Me + + R
H2 N Me Bu3Sn
N OTf
HO H Br 99
R OMe
97 98 cat. Zr(IV)
Buchwald–Hartwig Stille
cat. Pd(0) cat. Pd(0)
Me3Al
96a carbazomadurin A R = Me + + R
96b carbazomadurin B R = Et Bu3SnCl
100
obtained from isovanillic acid in two steps and 91% overall yield. Arylamine 98 can
be prepared in five steps and 44% overall yield starting from commercially avail-
able 2-bromo-6-nitrotoluene. Buchwald–Hartwig coupling of the two components
using 5 mol% of palladium(II) acetate and 7.5 mol% of 2,20 -bis(diphenylpho-
sphino)-1,10 -binaphthyl (BINAP) in the presence of cesium carbonate afforded
the diarylamine 101 (Scheme 27). Subsequent oxidative cyclization provided the
COOMe COOMe
OMe
cat. Pd(OAc)2, cat. BINAP OMe Pd(OAc)2
+
H2N Me 43 %
OTf 62 % N Me
Br H
OMe OMe Br
97 98 101
COOMe COOMe
OMe 1. BBr3 OTPS
2. TPSCl cat. Pd(PPh3)4
Me Me
70 % 99a R = Me
N N
MeO H Br TPSO H Br Bu3Sn R 99b R = Et
102
103
COOMe HO HO
OTPS OTPS OH
DIBAL-H TBAF
Me
100 % Me Me
N
H N N
TPSO TPSO H HO H
R
R R
104a R = Me (95 %) 105a R = Me 96a R = Me (70 %) carbazomadurin A
104b R = Et (90 %) 105b R = Et 96b R = Et (88 %) carbazomadurin B
TPSCl
100 %
TPSO TPSO HO
OTPS OTPS OH
DMDO TBAF
Me
Me Me
53 % N
N N HO H
TPSO H TPSO H
O R
R O R
106a R = Me (±)-107a R = Me (±)-109a R = Me(24 %)
106b R = Et 107b / 108 R = Et (±)-epocarbazolin A
Scheme 27 Palladium-catalyzed synthesis of the carbazomadurins A (96a) and B (96b), and the
epocarbazolins A (109a) and B (109b)
226 I. Bauer and H.-J. Kn€
olker
Me Pd(OAc)2
Me cat. Pd(OAc)2 Cu(OAc)2
+
MeO NH2 rac-BINAP MeO N Table 1
Br H
113 100 %
114 115
Me
CHO MnO2 COOMe
DDQ KCN
MeO MeO MeO
N 79 % N MeOH N
H H 100 % H clausine C
116 117 clauszoline-K 118 (clauszoline-L)
BBr3 BBr3
KOH, EtOH
34 % 52 % 99 %
NBS HO MeO
HO
100 % N N
N
H H H
119 120 clausine M 121 clausine N
Br Me Me
Br Me Br
BBr3
86
MeO HO HO
N 100 % Ni(cod)2
N N
H H 47 % H
122 123 124 siamenol
clauszoline-K (117) in 79% yield. Ether cleavage of 117 with boron tribromide
provides the naturally occurring alkaloid 3-formyl-7-hydroxycarbazole (119).
Treatment of clauszoline-K (117) with manganese dioxide in the presence of
potassium cyanide in methanol converts the formyl group to a methyl ester function
and thus, affords clausine C (118). Clausine C (118) can be further transformed to
clausine M (120) or clausine N (121) by ether cleavage or saponification of the
methyl ester. Quantitative and regioselective electrophilic bromination of interme-
diate 116 at C-6 was achieved using N-bromosuccinimide (NBS). Ether cleavage
followed by coupling with a dimeric p-prenylnickel bromide complex, generated in
situ from prenyl bromide (86) and bis(1,5-cyclooctadiene)nickel(0), provided sia-
menol (124) [148].
A wide range of 6-oxygenated carbazole alkaloids has been isolated from natural
sources. Glycozoline (128) was originally isolated from the root bark of Glycosmis
pentaphylla [161, 162]. It shows antibiotic and antifungal properties [163]. The
related 3-methyl-6-hydroxycarbazole (131) was obtained first from G. pentaphylla
and named glycozolinine (131) [164]. Bhattacharyya isolated the same compound
one year later and named it glycozolinol (131) [165]. Glycomaurrol (135) was
found in the extract of the stem bark of Glycosmis mauritiana [166]. Franzblau
isolated 3-formyl-6-methoxycarbazole (129) and micromeline (130) from the stem
bark extract of Micromelum hirsutum [167]. Both compounds showed anti-TB
activity. The furo[2,3-c]carbazole alkaloid eustifoline-D (132) (Scheme 29) was
isolated from the root bark of M. euchrestifolia Hayata [168], a plant that has been
traditionally used in Chinese folk medicine.
Our palladium-catalyzed approach for the construction of the carbazole frame-
work led to the 6-oxygenated tricyclic carbazole alkaloids glycozoline (128),
methyl 6-methoxycarbazole-3-carboxylate (133), glycomaurrol (135) and micro-
meline (130), as well as to the furo[2,3-c]carbazole alkaloid eustifoline-D (132)
(Scheme 29) [149]. Palladium-catalyzed coupling of p-bromoanisole (125) and
p-toluidine (126) as the first step led almost quantitatively to the diarylamine 127.
Oxidative cyclization of intermediate 127 using 0.1 equiv. of palladium(II)
acetate in the presence of an excess of copper(II) acetate provided glycozoline
(128) in 60% yield, which corresponds to a turnover number of TON ¼ 6 for the
palladium(II) catalyst. Glycozoline (128) represents a central intermediate of this
approach. Oxidation of the 3-methyl group to a formyl moiety with 2,3-dichloro-
5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone (DDQ) provided 3-formyl-6-methoxycarbazole
(129). Further oxidation of the formyl group using Corey’s conditions by treat-
ment with manganese dioxide and potassium cyanide in methanol afforded
methyl 6-methoxycarbazole-3-carboxylate (133), which is a naturally occurring
carbazole alkaloid. Alternatively, compound 129 can be regioselectively bromi-
nated at the 5-position. Subsequent cleavage of the methyl ether and prenylation
at C-5 with the dimeric p-prenylnickel bromide complex afforded micromeline
(130). Ether cleavage of glycozoline (128) with boron tribromide provided the
6-hydroxycarbazole glycozolinine (131). Annulation of the furan ring by reaction
with 2-bromo-1,1-diethoxyethane and subsequent cyclization under acidic con-
ditions using catalytic amounts of amberlyst 15 led to eustifoline-D (132) and its
Synthesis of Pyrrole and Carbazole Alkaloids 229
MeO Me MeO Me
cat. Pd(OAc)2 cat. Pd(OAc)2
+
cat. BINAP N Cu(OAc)2
Br H 2N
97% H 60%
1. NBS,
MeO Me MeO CHO
2. BBr3 HO CHO
DDQ 3. prenylBr (86), Ni(cod)2
76% 21%
N N
H H N
H
128 glycozoline 129 130 micromeline
HO Me OEt COOMe
O Me MeO
Br
1. EtO
2. amberlyst 15
N 36% N N
H H H
glycozolinine
131 132 eustifoline-D 133
(glycozolinol)
NBS
45%
Br
HO Me HO Me
prenylBr (86)
Ni(cod)2
N 25% N
H H
134 135 glycomaurrol
1. DIBAL-H H2, Pd / C
2. MnO2 89 %
95 %
N
H OH
144 clausine Z
Me
Me Me
cat. Pd(OAc)2, cat. BINAP Pd(OAc)2
iodobenzene Table 2 OMe
H2N OMe N OMe N
72 %
H H
54 145 146
palladium(II) acetate and 2.5 equiv. of copper(II) acetate in pivalic acid under argon
atmosphere. The use of pivalic acid instead of acetic acid proved to be advanta-
geous [176]. However, the turnover number of 2.1 for this reaction was rather poor.
The product, 2-methoxy-3-methylcarbazole (146), represents a naturally occurring
carbazole alkaloid. Oxidation of the methyl group at C-3 with 2,3-dichloro-5,6-
dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone (DDQ) led to glycosinine (147). Further oxidation to the
methyl ester using manganese dioxide and potassium cyanide in methanol provided
clausine L (148). Finally, ether cleavage of 148 with boron tribromide afforded
mukonidine (149) [150].
Clausine V (151) was prepared in two steps (Scheme 32) [150]. Buchwald–
Hartwig coupling of m-anisidine (113) with 3-bromoanisole afforded the diaryla-
mine 150. Different reaction conditions have been tried for the subsequent
palladium(II)-catalyzed oxidative cyclization to clausine V (151) (Table 3). Appli-
cation of 0.1 equiv. of palladium(II) acetate and 0.1 equiv. of copper(II) acetate in
glacial acetic acid under an oxygen atmosphere gave the best result for the catalytic
process (49% yield). The turnover number of almost 5 confirmed that the system
works in a catalytic mode. However, in this case the best yield (67%) was obtained
using stoichiometric amounts of palladium(II) acetate in air without co-oxidant.
Pityriazole (152) represents an unusual example of a 2-oxygenated carbazole
alkaloid since it has an additional indol-3-yl substituent at C-1. This natural product
was isolated along with other tryptophan metabolites by Steglich and co-workers
from a culture of the human pathogenic yeast Malassezia furfur, which is believed
to be responsible for the skin disease pityriasis versicolor [177]. Due to the structural
similarity of pityriazole (152) to mukonidine (149) and clausine L (148), we
Pd(OAc)2
MeO OMe
Table 3 N
H
151 clausine V
envisaged a common synthetic strategy for all three natural products [178]. Our
synthetic strategy for pityriazole (152) involved construction of the central pyrrole
ring of the carbazole framework by palladium(0)-catalyzed Buchwald–Hartwig
amination and subsequent palladium(II)-catalyzed oxidative cyclization (Scheme 33).
The indol-3-yl group at C-1 should be introduced by palladium(0)-catalyzed
Suzuki–Miyaura coupling with the N-protected indol-3-ylboronic acid 155.
Palladium(0)-catalyzed coupling of iodobenzene (153) and the commercial
arylamine 154 afforded quantitatively the diarylamine 156 (Scheme 34) [178].
The oxidative cyclization of the diarylamine 156 to clausine L (148) is catalytic
in palladium(II) and copper(II) acetate (or manganese(III) acetate, respectively).
Thus, air is the actual oxidizing agent in this process. For example, employing only
0.05 equiv. of palladium(II) acetate and 0.1 equiv. of copper(II) acetate provided
Åkermark–Knölker Suzuki–Miyaura
cat. Pd(II) cat. Pd(0)
COOH (HO)2B
cat. Pd COOMe
OH + +
N I H2N OMe N
H PhO2S
152 153 154 155
N
H
Buchwald–Hartwig
cat. Pd(0)
154 156
COOMe COOH
(HO)2B cat. S-Phos OH OH
cat. Pd(OAc)2 KOH, EtOH
157 + N N
N 82 % H 86 % H
SO2Ph
N N
PhO2S H
155 158 152 pityriazole
Me Me Me
O OH
cat. Pd
O + +
N OCOCF3
H Br
O NH2 NO2
Buchwald–Hartwig Wacker
cat. Pd(0) cat. Pd(II)
OH
TFAA, DBU
Me Me Me
163
OH O O
OCOCF3 o-xylene Fe, AcOH
71% (two steps) 140°C 100%
98%
NO2 NO2 NO2
162 164 165
Me 0.1 eq Pd (OAc)2
Me Me
cat. BINAP 2.5 eq Cu (OAc)2
O
cat. Pd(OAc)2 AcOH / H2O
N O N O
c6H5 (160) 90°C, 5 h H
93% H 57%
NH2 O
161 166 167
0.1 eq Pd(OAc)2
0.1 eq Cu(OAc)2
AcOH / H2O
90 °C, 48 h
40 %
Me Me 0.1 eq Pd(OAc)2
0.1 eq Cu(OAc)2
1. LiAlH4 AcOH
O
O 2.HCl 90 °C, 24 h
N N
70% H 44%
H
O
168 girinimbine 159 euchrestifoline
(TON ¼ 4.4). Under optimized conditions compound 166 can be directly con-
verted to euchrestifoline (159) by reaction with 0.1 equiv. of palladium(II) acetate
and 0.1 equiv. of copper(II) acetate for 2 days. The turnover number for the one-pot
triple C–H bond activation (TON of 4.0) is in the same order of magnitude as for the
individual reactions (Wacker oxidation and oxidative cyclization). Euchrestifoline
(159) was further transformed into girinimbine (168) by reduction of the ketone
using lithium aluminum hydride followed by elimination under acidic conditions.
The 2,6-dioxygenated carbazole alkaloid glycozolidine (170) was isolated first
by Chakraborty et al. from the root bark of G. pentaphylla in 1966 [182]. Glyco-
zolidal (171) and glycozolidol (175) were obtained from the same natural source by
Bhattacharyya et al. [183, 184]. Carbalexin C (179) represents a stress-induced
phytoalexin generated in the leaves of G. pentaphylla and Glycosmis parviflora
[185]. Lansine (181) was isolated by Kapil et al. from the leaves of C. lansium
[186]. Glycozolidal (171) and lansine (181) were also isolated by Wu and co-
workers from the stem bark of the Chinese medicinal plant C. excavata [113].
Glycozolidine (170) was synthesized via a straightforward two-step reaction
sequence. Buchwald–Hartwig coupling of 4-bromoanisol (125) with 3-methoxy-
4-methylaniline (54) afforded the diarylamine 169 (Scheme 37) [152]. Oxidative
cyclization of 169 using 0.1 equiv. of palladium(II) acetate and 2.5 equiv. of
copper(II) acetate under microwave irradiation provided glycozolidine (170)
(TON ¼ 6.8). Oxidation of the methyl group of 170 using 2,3-dichloro-5,6-
dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone (DDQ) afforded glycozolidal (171).
The hydroxy-methoxycarbazoles glycozolidol (175), carbalexin C (179), and
lansine (181) were prepared using protecting groups for the hydroxy groups at the
2- or 6-position, respectively. Thus, the synthesis of glycozolidol (175) starts with
Buchwald–Hartwig amination of the benzyl-protected p-bromophenol 172 and
3-methoxy-4-methylaniline (54) (Scheme 38) [152]. The palladium(II)-catalyzed
oxidative cyclization provided the benzyl-protected glycozolidol 174 (TON ¼ 6.0)
under the same conditions as described above for the synthesis of glycozolidine
(170) (cf. Scheme 37). Finally, removal of the benzyl group led to glycozolidol
(175).
MeO Me MeO Me
cat. Pd(OAc)2, cat. BINAP
+
75% N OMe
Br H2N OMe
H
125 54 169
BnO Me BnO Me
cat. Pd(OAc)2, cat. BINAP
+
83% N OMe
Br H 2N OMe
H
172 54 173
MeO Me MeO Me
cat. Pd(OAc)2, cat. BINAP
+
86% N OTPS
Br H2N OTPS
H
125 176 177
For the synthesis of carbalexin C (179) and lansine (181) the protecting group
strategy was reversed. The TPS-protected 2-methyl-5-aminophenol 176 had to be
employed to enable a release of the free hydroxy group at C-2 in the final step of the
synthesis. Buchwald–Hartwig coupling of compound 176 with p-bromoanisole
(125) afforded the diarylamine 177 (Scheme 39) [152]. The palladium(II)-catalyzed
oxidative cyclization in the presence of copper(II) acetate as co-oxidant under
microwave irradiation gave the carbazole 178 (TON ¼ 7.6). Desilylation of
compound 178 led to carbalexin C (179). This first total synthesis provided
the phytoalexin carbalexin C (179) in five steps and 59% overall yield based
238 I. Bauer and H.-J. Kn€
olker
R R′
R R′
cat. Pd(OAc)2 R R′ O2 or air
+
P-ligand N AcOH N
OTf NH2 H H
182 31 95 32
R R'
R R'
R R'
cat. Cu(II) Pd(II)
+
N
H N
Pb(OAc)3 NH2 H
183 31 95 32
Me R1 Me
R1
cat. Cu(OAc)2
+
H2N R3 N R3
Pb(OAc)3 2 H
R R2
0.4 eq Pd(OAc)2 R1 Me
2.0 eq Cu(OAc)2 146 R1 = R2 = H, R3 = OMe (89 %)
R3 170 R1 = R3 = OMe, R2 = H (80 %) glycozolidine
N 188 R1 = R3 = H, R2 = OMe (88 %) murrayafoline A
H R2
In contrast to the synthetic approaches described in Sects. 3.2.1 and 3.2.2, the
N-arylation and C–C coupling steps can also be reversed. Suzuki–Miyaura coupling
of N-substituted 2-haloarylamines 189 with arylboronic acids 190 provides
N-substituted 2-aminobiaryls 191 (Scheme 43). A palladium(II)-catalyzed oxida-
tive cyclization of the latter forms the tricyclic carbazole framework. Different
from the first reaction step in Scheme 24, this is an oxidative C–N coupling which
requires N–H and C–H activation, whereas the C–C bond is formed in a cross-
coupling process.
Oxidative cyclization of 2-phenylacetanilides in the presence of catalytic
amounts of palladium(II) acetate and copper(II) acetate as co-oxidant in an oxygen
atmosphere affords N-acetylcarbazoles. Subsequent hydrolysis or reduction of
the N-acetylcarbazoles leads to the corresponding 9H-carbazoles [193]. For the
synthesis of mukonidine (149) and glycosinine (147) oxidative cyclization
of the N-acetylated 2-aminobiphenyl 193 afforded the N-acetylcarbazole 194
(Scheme 44) [194]. Demethylation of 194 and amide cleavage led to mukonidine
(149). Alternatively, reduction of compound 194 with lithium aluminum hydride
240 I. Bauer and H.-J. Kn€
olker
R3
R1 R3
X R3
R1
cat. Pd(0) H cat. Pd(II)
+ R1
NH N oxidizing
B(OH)2 R2 N
R2 agent
R2
189 190 191 192
COOMe
COOMe
cat.Pd(OAc)2
OMe
Cu(OAc)2
OMe
HN O2 N
94 % Ac
Ac
193 194
1. BBr3 1. LiAlH4
2. H2SO4 / MeOH 2. MnO2
85 % 74 %
COOMe CHO
OH OMe
N N
H H
149 mukonidine 147 glycosinine
R R′ R R′
H(X) (H)Y R R′
cat. Pd(0) cat. Pd(0)
+
N
X H2N N
(X)H H Y(H) H
195 196 197 32
Me Me
Cl cat. Pd(OAc)2, PCy3
+ H2N K3PO4, NMP
Cl N
OMe 72 %
H OMe
202 203 188 murrayafoline A
with the aryl triflate 198 led to the diarylamine 200. Subsequent Heck-type cycli-
zation afforded mukonine (201).
Chlorinated diarylamines have also been successfully cyclized using N-hetero-
cyclic carbene (NHC) palladium catalysts. It has been demonstrated that the
turnover number of the catalytic system is substantially improved by using imida-
zolium salt additives along with a mono-NHC–palladium(II) pre-catalyst [201].
A potential homo-coupling of the halogenated arylamines is avoided by having
the halogen leaving groups attached to the same arene. Guided by this idea,
Ackermann et al. reported a palladium-catalyzed domino synthesis of substituted
carbazoles with readily available anilines and 1,2-dihaloarenes (Scheme 47) [202].
The procedure has been applied to the synthesis of murrayafoline A (188) by
coupling of 1,2-dichlorobenzene (202) with the arylamine 203.
R1 R3 R1 R3
cat. Pd(0)
+ H2N–R2
N
X X
R2
204 205 192
Pd(0)
Suzuki–Miyaura coupling
Me
Me
Pd(0)
OH
Pd(0) O O-Arylation
N N
double O
N-Arylation Me Me Me
Me Me
207
(±)-206 Friedel–Crafts-type
(±)-murrayazoline Michael Addition
Me
Br Br
H2N O OH
OMOM + N
Me O
Me Me
Me Me
210 209 208
O
Me
S
+ OMOM O
Br S
B(OH)2 H2N
211 212
type Michael addition to give the pentacyclic carbazole 207. Conversion of the
hydroxy group into the triflate and diastereoselective methylation of the ketone led
to the carbinol 215. Finally, cyclization by O-arylation using stoichiometric
amounts of palladium(II) acetate, 2-di-tert-butylphosphinobiphenyl, and cesium
carbonate provided ()-murrayazoline [()-206].
Further applications of the double N-arylation to the synthesis of carbazoles
include the natural products ellipticine [207] and mukonine (201) [208], and
various non-natural 11-phenylbenzofuro[3,2-b]carbazoles [209].
244 I. Bauer and H.-J. Kn€
olker
Me
Me
cat. Pd2(dba)3 OMOM
H2N O
X-Phos, NaOt-Bu N
OMOM +
Me 59% Me
Me O
Br Br Me O
210 209 213 O
Me
Me
Sc(OTf)3 OH Tf2O
OH
N
73 % N O 94 %
Me
Me
Me
Me
O
208 207
Me Me Me
Pd(OAc)2
OTf MeMgBr OTf P-ligand
N O
N 77 % N OH Cs2CO3
O
Me Me 80 % Me
Me Me
Me Me Me
B(OR)2 EWG
EWG
X cat. Pd(0)
+
NH MW N
SO2R F SO2R
In a one-pot procedure, the reaction of o-iodoanilines 219 with silylaryl triflates 220
in the presence of cesium fluoride affords via an aryne intermediate the o-iododiar-
ylamines 221 which are subsequently cyclized to carbazoles 32 by an in situ
generated palladium(0) catalyst (Scheme 52) [211, 212].
This procedure has been applied to the synthesis of mukonine (201) (Scheme 53)
[212]. The o-iodoaniline 222 was prepared in two steps from commercially avail-
able 4-amino-3-methoxybenzoic acid. Reaction of compound 222 with the silylaryl
triflate 220a in the presence of cesium fluoride leads to an intermediate diarylamine,
which is cyclized in situ by addition of catalytic amounts of palladium(II) acetate
and tricyclohexylphosphane to afford mukonine (201) (three steps and 76% overall
yield).
R R′ I R R′
I TMS
CsF R R′ cat. Pd(0)
+
NH2 TfO N N
H H
219 220 221 32
COOMe
TMS I COOMe
CsF
+
then cat. Pd(OAc)2
OTf H2N N
cat. PCy3
OMe H OMe
95 %
220a 222 201 mukonine
R R
O R R′
R′
O 1. NaOH, EtOH Pd(II)
N 2. MeI N N
H H OMe
Ar OMe
223 224 225
OMe
O CHO
O
O O NEt3 CHO DDQ
+ 4-MeOC6H4 N O
O
dioxane BF3•Et2O N 70 %
40 % 93 % 4-MeOC6H4
NCO
226 227 228 229
This sequence has been used for the synthesis of 6-methoxymurrayanine (232)
(Scheme 55) [214]. Reaction of butane-2,3-dione (226) with 4-methoxyphenyl
isocyanate (227) to 4,5-dimethylene-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1,3-oxazolidin-2-one
(228) followed by regioselective boron trifluoride-catalyzed Diels–Alder reaction
with acrolein afforded the oxazolone 229. Only minor amounts of the undesired
regioisomer were formed. Aromatization using 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-
benzoquinone (DDQ) afforded the benzoxazol-2-one 230. Saponification of the
cyclic carbamate and subsequent O-methylation led to the diarylamine 231. Finally,
oxidative cyclization using stoichiometric amounts of palladium(II) acetate
provided 6-methoxymurrayanine (232).
This method has also been applied to the synthesis of murrayanine, murrayafo-
line A (188) [213], and clausenine [214] using stoichiometric amounts of palladium
(II) actetate for the oxidative cyclization of the intermediate diarylamines.
More recently, a variation of the method described above (cf. Scheme 54) has
been reported (Scheme 56) [215]. Hydrolytic cleavage of the 3-(2-bromophenyl)
Synthesis of Pyrrole and Carbazole Alkaloids 247
R
O
O Br R′ R
N 1. NaOH, EtOH R′ R cat. Pd(0)
2. MeI N
R′ Br N
H OMe H OMe
O O O
Bu3Sn R′ R′
I cat. Pd(0) R cat. Pd(0) R′
R
R + CO
O 2N N
O2N
H
235 236 237
238
R R′
1. Wolff–Kishner reduction
2. aromatization N
H
32
4 Conclusion
References
1. Sundberg RJ (1984) In: Katritzky AR, Rees CW (eds) Comprehensive heterocyclic chemis-
try, vol 4. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 313–376
2. Bean GP (1990) In: Jones RA (ed) Chemistry of heterocyclic compounds, pyrroles. Wiley,
New York, pp 105–294
3. Jones RA (1992) Chemistry of heterocyclic compounds, Part II, vol 48. Wiley, New York
4. Sundberg RJ (1996) In: Katritzky AR, Rees CW, Scriven EFV (eds) Comprehensive
heterocyclic chemistry II, vol 2. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 119–206
5. Gribble GW (1996) In: Katritzky AR, Rees CW, Scriven EFV (eds) Comprehensive hetero-
cyclic chemistry II, vol 2. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 207–257
6. O’Hagan D (2000) Nat Prod Rep 17:435–446
7. Bellina F, Rossi R (2006) Tetrahedron 62:7213–7256
8. Joule JA, Mills K (2010) Heterocyclic chemistry. Wiley-Blackwell, New York
9. Patil NT, Yamamoto Y (2007) Arkivoc (x) 121–141
10. Hashmi ASK (2007) Chem Rev 107:3180–3211
11. F€urstner A, Davies P (2007) Angew Chem Int Ed 46:3410–3449
12. Arcadi A (2008) Chem Rev 108:3266–3325
13. Patil NT, Yamamoto Y (2008) Chem Rev 108:3395–3442
Synthesis of Pyrrole and Carbazole Alkaloids 249
55. Martı́n R, Rodrı́guez Rivero MR, Buchwald SL (2006) Angew Chem Int Ed 45:7079–7082
56. Martı́n R, Larsen CH, Cuenca A, Buchwald SL (2007) Org Lett 9:3379–3382
57. Yuan X, Xu X, Zhou X, Yuan J, Mai L, Li Y (2007) J Org Chem 72:1510–1513
58. Rivero MR, Buchwald SL (2007) Org Lett 9:973–976
59. Zheng Q, Hua R (2010) Tetrahedron Lett 51:4512–4514
60. Yan R-L, Luo J, Wang C-X, Ma C-W, Huang G-S, Liang Y-M (2010) J Org Chem
75:5395–5397
61. Chiba S, Wang Y-F, Lapointe G, Narasaka K (2008) Org Lett 10:313–316
62. Wyrebek P, Sniady A, Bewick N, Li Y, Mikus A, Wheeler KA, Dembinski R (2009)
Tetrahedron 65:1268–1275
63. Dong H, Shen M, Redford JE, Stokes BJ, Pumphrey AL, Driver TG (2007) Org Lett
9:5191–5194
64. Liu X-t, Hao L, Lin M, Chen L, Zhan Z-p (2010) Org Biomol Chem 8:3064–3072
65. Hiroya K, Matsumoto S, Ashikawa M, Ogiwara K, Sakamoto T (2006) Org Lett
8:5349–5352
66. Yoshida M, Al-Amin M, Shishido K (2009) Synthesis 2454–2466
67. Liu X-t, Huang L, Zheng F-j, Zhan Z-p (2008) Adv Synth Catal 350:2778–2788
68. Pridmore SJ, Slatford PA, Taylor JE, Whittlesey MK, Williams JMJ (2009) Tetrahedron
65:8981–8986
69. Ackermann L, Sandmann R, Kaspar LT (2009) Org Lett 11:2031–2034
70. Merkul E, Boersch C, Frank W, M€ uller TJJ (2009) Org Lett 11:2269–2272
71. Wang Y-F, Toh KK, Chiba S, Narasaka K (2008) Org Lett 10:5019–5022
72. Kn€olker H-J, Bauermeister M, Bl€aser D, Boese R, Pannek J-B (1989) Angew Chem Int Ed
Engl 28:223–225
73. Kn€olker H-J (1992) Synlett 371–387
74. Birch AJ, Cross PE, Lewis J, White DA, Wild SB (1968) J Chem Soc A 332–340
75. Ireland RE, Brown GG, Stanford RH, McKenzie TC (1974) J Org Chem 39:51–59
76. Kn€olker H-J, Baum E, Gonser P, Rohde G, R€ ottele H (1998) Organometallics 17:3916–3925
77. Kn€olker H-J, Ahrens B, Gonser P, Heininger M, Jones PG (2000) Tetrahedron 56:2259–2271
78. Kn€olker H-J (2000) Chem Rev 100:2941–2962
79. Pearson AJ (1980) Acc Chem Res 13:463–469
80. Pearson AJ (1982) In: Wilkinson G, Stone FGA, Abel EW (eds) Comprehensive organome-
tallic chemistry, vol 8. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 939–1011
81. Pearson AJ (1985) Metallo-organic chemistry. Wiley, Chichester, pp 247–347
82. Kn€olker H-J (1998) In: Beller M, Bolm C (eds) Transition metals for organic synthesis:
building blocks and fine chemicals, vol 1. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp 534–549
83. Kn€olker H-J (1999) Chem Soc Rev 28:151–157
84. Kn€olker H-J, Braier A, Br€ ocher DJ, C€ammerer S, Fr€ ohner W, Gonser P, Hermann H,
Herzberg D, Reddy KR, Rohde G (2001) Pure Appl Chem 73:1075–1086
85. Stephenson GR, Perseghini M, Togni A (2001) In: Lautens M (ed) Science of synthesis, vol
1. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 745–796
86. Kn€olker H-J (2004) Curr Org Synth 1:309–331
87. Kn€olker H-J (2004) In: Beller M, Bolm C (eds) Transition metals for organic synthesis:
building blocks and fine chemicals, vol 1, 2nd edn. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp 585–599
88. Bauer I, Kn€olker H-J (2009) In: Rawal VH, Kozmin SA (eds) Science of synthesis, vol 46.
Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 637–668
89. Fischer EO, Fischer RD (1960) Angew Chem 72:919
90. Kn€olker H-J, Baum G, Foitzik N, Goesmann H, Gonser P, Jones PG, R€ ottele H (1998) Eur J
Inorg Chem 993–1007
91. Davies SG, Green MLH, Mingos DMP (1978) Tetrahedron 34:3047–3077
92. Kn€olker H-J, Bauermeister M, Pannek J-B, Bl€aser D, Boese R (1993) Tetrahedron
49:841–862
93. Kn€olker H-J, Bauermeister M (1993) Tetrahedron 49:11221–11236
Synthesis of Pyrrole and Carbazole Alkaloids 251
180. Chakraborty DP, Barman BK, Bose PK (1964) Sci Cult 30:445
181. Gruner KK, Kn€olker H-J (2008) Org Biomol Chem 6:3902–3904
182. Chakraborty DP, Das BP (1966) Sci Cult 32:181–182
183. Bhattacharyya P, Chowdhury BK (1985) J Nat Prod 48:465–466
184. Bhattacharyya P, Chakrabartty PK, Chowdhury BK (1985) Phytochemistry 24:882–883
185. Pacher T, Bacher M, Hofer O, Greger H (2001) Phytochemistry 58:129–135
186. Prakash D, Raj K, Kapil RS, Popli SP (1980) Indian J Chem 19B:1075–1076
187. Liegault B, Lee D, Huestis MP, Stuart DR, Fagnou K (2008) J Org Chem 73:5022–5028
188. Watanabe T, Ueda S, Inuki S, Oishi S, Fujii N, Ohno H (2007) Chem Commun 4516–4518
189. Watanabe T, Oishi S, Fujii N, Ohno H (2009) J Org Chem 74:4720–4726
190. Sridharan V, Martı́n MA, Menéndez JC (2006) Synlett 2375–2378
191. Sridharan V, Martı́n MA, Menéndez JC (2009) Eur J Org Chem 4614–4621
192. Barton DHR, Donnelly DMX, Finet J-P, Guiry PJ (1991) J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 1
2095–2102
193. Tsang WCP, Zheng N, Buchwald SL (2005) J Am Chem Soc 127:14560–14561
194. Tsang WCP, Munday RH, Brasche G, Zheng N, Buchwald SL (2008) J Org Chem
73:7603–7610
195. Jordan-Hore JA, Johansson CCC, Gulias M, Beck EM, Gaunt MJ (2008) J Am Chem Soc
130:16184–16186
196. Iwaki T, Yasuhara A, Sakamoto T (1999) J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 1 1505–1510
197. Bedford RB, Betham M (2006) J Org Chem 71:9403–9410
198. Bedford RB, Betham M, Charmant JPH, Weeks AL (2008) Tetrahedron 64:6038–6050
199. Ca ND, Sassi G, Catellani M (2008) Adv Synth Catal 350:2179–2182
200. Campeau L-C, Parisien M, Jean A, Fagnou K (2006) J Am Chem Soc 128:581–590
201. Campeau L-C, Thansandote P, Fagnou K (2005) Org Lett 7:1857–1860
202. Ackermann L, Althammer A (2007) Angew Chem Int Ed 46:1627–1629
203. Nozaki K, Takahashi K, Nakano K, Hiyama T, Tang H-Z, Fujiki M, Yamaguchi S, Tamo K
(2003) Angew Chem Int Ed 42:2051–2053
204. Kitawaki T, Hayashi Y, Chida N (2005) Heterocycles 65:1561–1567
205. Kitawaki T, Hayashi Y, Ueno A, Chida N (2006) Tetrahedron 62:6792–6801
206. Ueno A, Kitawaki T, Chida N (2008) Org Lett 10:1999–2002
207. Konakahara T, Kiran YB, Okuno Y, Ikeda R, Sakai N (2010) Tetrahedron Lett 51:
2335–2338
208. Kuwahara A, Nakano K, Nozaki K (2005) J Org Chem 70:413–419
209. Kawaguchi K, Nakano K, Nozaki K (2008) Org Lett 10:1199–1202
210. St.Jean DJ, Poon SF, Schwarzbach JL (2007) Org Lett 9:4893–4896
211. Liu Z, Larock RC (2004) Org Lett 6:3739–3741
212. Liu Z, Larock RC (2007) Tetrahedron 63:347–355
213. Benavides A, Peralta J, Delgado F, Tamariz J (2004) Synthesis 2499–2504
214. Bernal P, Benavides A, Bautista R, Tamariz J (2007) Synthesis 1943–1948
215. Bernal P, Tamariz J (2007) Helv Chim Acta 90:1449–1454
216. Scott TL, S€oderberg BCG (2003) Tetrahedron 59:6323–6332
217. Scott TL, Yu X, Gorugantula SP, Carrero-Martı́nez G, S€
oderberg BCG (2006) Tetrahedron
62:10835–10842
Index
A 3-Bromoindole, 75
Acetylcholine esterase (AChE), 2 6-Bromoindolin-3-one, 110
Actinomadura madurae, 224 Bromoisovanillin, 52
Actinophyllic acid, 165 Brunsvigine, 163, 179
Actinoplanes (ATCC 33002), 207 Buprenorphine, 35, 59
Alkaloids, cernuane-type, 24
fawcettimine-type, 4
lycoposerramines, 1 C
phlegmarine-type, 11 Cadaverine, 2
quinolizidine-type, 23 Carbalexins, 236, 237
spirocyclic isoquinoline, 193 Carbazoles, 203
2-Alkylmercaptoindoles, thia-Claisen iron(0)-mediated/palladium(0/II)-catalyzed
rearrangements, 112 cyclizations, 203
Allocolchicine, 168 iron-mediated synthesis, 211
Allyldiisopinocampheylborane, 14 palladium-catalyzed synthesis, 222
Alzheimer’s disease, 2, 188 Carbazomadurins, 224, 248
Amabiline, 163, 183, 185, 187 Carbazomycins, 211, 241
Amaryllidaceae, 52, 163 Carbazoquinocin C, 213
Amauromine, 70, 112 Carduus crispus, 206
Ambiguine H, 85 Carquinostatin, 213, 220
Analgesia, 33 Cermizines, 20, 24
Annonidine A, 90 Cernuine, 20, 24
Annonidinium manni, 90 Chlorodiisopinocampheylborane, 15
Antiostatins, 217 6-Chlorohyellazole, 214
Ardeemin, 100 Citronellal, 21, 27
Aspidosperma alkaloids, 197 Citronellic acid, 7
Aspidospermidine, 163, 197 Clausena excavata, 215, 226
Asterriquinone B1, 86 Clausena lansium, 229
Asymmetric synthesis, 1 Clausenine, 231, 238, 246
Aszonalenin, 99 Clausenol, 229
Azepinoindole, 117 Clausines, 215, 226, 229
Azidodihydrobenzothiophene, 151 Clauszoline, 216, 226
Clavicipitic acids, 116
Clividine, 172
B Codeine, 33, 55
Bispyrroloiminoquinones, 131, 143 Codeinone, 56
Blebbistatin, 208 Codonopsinine, 209
Brevianamides, 77, 120 Colchiceine, 166
255
256 Index
K
Kopsia griffithii, 206 N
Nalbuphine, 35, 59
Naloxone, 35, 59
L Naltrexone, 35, 59
Lansine, 236 Nangustine, 163, 179
Latrunculiida, 133 Narciclasine, 163, 191, 194
Lavanduquinocin, 213, 221 Narseronine, 172, 176, 178
Leuconolam, 170 Narwedine, 52
Lycodine, 12 Neocarazostatin, 115, 213, 220
Lycopodine, 2 Neopinone, 56
Lycopodium alkaloids, 1 Nerve growth factor (NFG), 2
Lycoposerramines, 1 Noroxymorphone, 60
γ-Lycorane, 163 Notoamides, 103
Lycoricidine, 163, 191, 194
Lycorine, 172
Lycoris radiata, 188 O
Lyngbyatoxin, 118 Okaramine C, 74, 86, 120
Lysergic acid, 165 Opiate alkaloids, 33
Oripavine, 34, 59
Overman rearrangement, 163
M Oxidative cyclization, 203
Makaluvamines, 131, 138, 149 Oxofuro[2,3-b]indoles, 101
Malassezia furfur, 232 Oxycodone, 35
Maritinamine, 163, 183
3-Mercaptoindoles, 89
7-Methoxy-3-methylcarbazole, 227 P
2-Methoxy-3-methylcarbazole, 238 Palladium, 203
1-Methoxycarbazoles, 247 Pancratistatin, 191
6-Methoxymurrayanine, 229, 246 Paraherquamide A, 102
7-Methoxy-O-methylmukonal, 215 Pelletierine, 2
Micromeline, 228 Pentabromopseudilin, 207
Micromelum euchrestifolia, 228, 234 Pentachloropseudilin, 207
Micromelum hirsutum, 228 Phenanthroline silver complexes, 208
Mitsunobu reaction, 163 2-Phenylacetanilides, 239
Montabuphine, 181 11-Phenylbenzofuro[3,2-b]carbazoles, 243
Montanine alkaloids, 179 Phenyloxazolidinone, 7
Morphinans, 43 Phlegmariurine, 11
Morphine, 165 Phytoalexins, 237
total synthesis, 33 Pictet-Spengler reaction, 163
Mukonidine, 221, 231, 232, 240 4-(2-Piperidyl)acetoacetic acid, 2
Mukonine, 221, 238, 245 Pityriasis versicolor, 232
Murraya euchrestifolia, 118 Pityriazole, 232
Murraya siamensis, 215, 226 Prenylation, indoles, 67
Murrayafoline, 238, 242, 246 3-tert-Prenylindol-2-one, 111
Murrayanine, 246 3-Prenyloxyindoles, 89
Murrayaquinone, 118, 247 Prenylstannane, 84
258 Index
N-Prenyltryprostatin B, 82 T
Prianosins, 131, 134, 155 Tardioxopiperazine, 115
Propargylic halides, indole, 75 Tetrahydro-1H-6H-5,10b-
Pseudilin, 208 ethanophenanthridine, 183
Pseudomonas bromoutilis, 207 Thebaine, 34, 55, 59
Pyrroles, 203, 205 Topoisomerase I, inhibition, 133, 144
silver(I)-catalyzed cyclization, 203 Tricarbonyl(η5-cyclohexadienylium)iron, 212
Pyrrolo[2,3-b]indole, 83 Tris(dimethylamino)sulfonium
Pyrroloiminoquinones, marine, 131 difluorotrimethylsilicate
(TASF), 19
Tropinone, 165
Q Tryprostatin B, 77, 79
Quinone imine dimethylacetals, 150 Tryptophan, N-tert-prenylation, 73
Tsitsikammamines, 132, 144
Tsuji–Trost coupling, 44
R
Radical cyclisation, 163
Regioselectivity, 67 U
Reserpine, 165 Ullmann reaction, 163
Rhazinal, 163, 170
Rhazinilam, 163, 170
Roquefortine, 102 V
Variecolorin, 115
Versicolamide, 107
S Vinblastine/vincristine, 165
Salimine, 168 3-Vinyl-3-pyrrolines, 209
Senepodine G, 23
Serratinine, tricyclic compounds, 5
Siamenol, 226 W
Silver, 203 Wakayin, 132, 144
Spirotryprostatins, 91, 97 Weinreb amide, 8
Stephacidins, 103, 104 Wittig reaction, 163
Strychnine, 165
Suhailamine, 168
Sulpinines, 118 Z
Suzuki-Miyaura reaction, 163 Zyzzya fuliginosa, 132