Salisbury Museum,

The King’s House

Test Pit Excavation 2018

September 2018

wessexarchaeology
© Wessex Archaeology Ltd 2018, all rights reserved.

Portway House
Old Sarum Park
Salisbury
Wiltshire
SP4 6EB

www.wessexarch.co.uk

Wessex Archaeology Ltd is a Registered Charity no. 287786 (England & Wales) and SC042630 (Scotland)
Disclaimer
The material contained in this report was designed as an integral part of a report to an individual client and was
prepared solely for the benefit of that client. The material contained in this report does not necessarily stand on its own
and is not intended to nor should it be relied upon by any third party. To the fullest extent permitted by law Wessex
Archaeology will not be liable by reason of breach of contract negligence or otherwise for any loss or damage (whether
direct indirect or consequential) occasioned to any person acting or omitting to act or refraining from acting in reliance
upon the material contained in this report arising from or connected with any error or omission in the material contained
in the report. Loss or damage as referred to above shall be deemed to include, but is not limited to, any loss of profits or
anticipated profits damage to reputation or goodwill loss of business or anticipated business damages costs expenses
incurred or payable to any third party (in all cases whether direct indirect or consequential) or any other direct indirect or
consequential loss or damage.
Document Information
Document title Salisbury Museum, The King’s House, Salisbury, Wiltshire
Document subtitle Test-pit excavation for the 2018 Festival of Archaeology
Document reference SMU18.1

Client name Salisbury Museum

Address The King’s House, 65 The Close, Salisbury, Wilts SP1 2EN

Site location The King’s House, Salisbury

County Wiltshire
National grid reference 414129 129495
Museum name Salisbury Museum
Museum accession code TBC

Date of fieldwork 21–22 July 2018

Fieldwork directed by Phil Harding
Project management by Lorraine Mepham (Senior Archives Manager)
Document compiled by Phil Harding
Contributions from Lorraine Mepham (finds)
Graphics by Rob Goller

Quality Assurance
Issue and date Status Author Approved by
1 05/09/18 Draft issued to client PAH
 Salisbury Museum, The King’s House, Salisbury, Wiltshire
Test-pit excavation for the 2018 Festival of Archaeology

Contents
SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................II
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................II
1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................1
1.1 Project background .........................................................................................................1
1.2 The site ............................................................................................................................1
1.3 Archaeological background .............................................................................................1
Recent archaeological investigations in the area ...............................................................................2
2 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................2
3 METHODOLOGY .....................................................................................................................3
3.1 Fieldwork methodology ...................................................................................................3
4 ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESULTS..............................................................................................3
4.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................3
4.2 Stratigraphy .....................................................................................................................3
5 FINDS .......................................................................................................................................4
5.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................4
5.2 Pottery .............................................................................................................................5
5.3 Ceramic Building Material ...............................................................................................5
5.4 Glass ...............................................................................................................................6
5.5 Copper Alloy and Worked Bone ......................................................................................6
5.6 Animal Bone ....................................................................................................................6
5.7 Other Finds ......................................................................................................................6
6 DISCUSSION ...........................................................................................................................7
7 STORAGE AND CURATION ...................................................................................................8
7.1 Museum ...........................................................................................................................8
7.2 Preparation of the archive ...............................................................................................8
7.3 Selection policy ...............................................................................................................8
7.4 Security copy ...................................................................................................................9
7.5 Copyright .........................................................................................................................9
REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................10
APPENDICES ..................................................................................................................................11
Appendix 1: Context descriptions ...........................................................................................11
Appendix 2: Quantification of finds by context ........................................................................12

List of Figures
Figure 1 Site location, GPR results, test pit plan, section and photograph

List of Plates
Front cover Excavation of the Test Pit and interaction with the public
Plate 1 Section viewed from the west (on Figure 1)

i
Doc ref. SMU18.1
 Salisbury Museum, The King’s House, Salisbury, Wiltshire
Test-pit excavation for the 2018 Festival of Archaeology

SUMMARY

The Festival of Archaeology test pit of 2018 continued a phase of work which aimed to
communicate the processes of archaeology to the public in conjunction with genuine research into
the story of the King’s House. The 2018 project aimed to relocate the wall foundations of an
extension to the extant north range. This extension was depicted by John Buckler in 1804 but
absent from a subsequent illustration in 1807. The excavation successfully relocated the
foundation, which was constructed of flint in the 16th–17th centuries, but failed to confirm the 15th-
century construction date of the extant range. Significantly reinterpretation of geophysical data
indicated that the former range probably extended to the frontage of the Close.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The 2018 project to search for the extension of the former north wing was initiated by Adrian
Green, Director of Salisbury and South Wilts Museum. Thanks are also extended to Owain
Hughes, Learning Officer at the museum for his continued support and enthusiasm.

The test pit was excavated by Phil Harding with the finds processed and presented by Lorraine
Mepham. Thanks are also due to Sue Martin and Sasha Cobby for site photography and general
support during the test pit exercise.

The text of this report was compiled by Phil Harding with the finds report compiled by Lorraine
Mepham. The graphics were prepared by Rob Goller. The project was managed at Wessex
Archaeology by Lorraine Mepham, Senior Project Manager.

ii
Doc ref. SMU18.1
 Salisbury Museum, The King’s House, Salisbury, Wiltshire
Test-pit excavation for the 2018 Festival of Archaeology

Salisbury Museum, The King’s House, Salisbury, Wiltshire

Test pit excavation for the 2018 Festival of Archaeology

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Project background

1.1.1 The Festival of Archaeology provides a mechanism by which archaeology can be
promoted to the general public, allowing them to be informed about what the discipline
involves. ‘Digging’ epitomises archaeology to many people, although most remain
blissfully unaware of the processes of excavation, observation, recording and
interpretation during an excavation as a means of ‘telling the story’ of the site. The test pit
methodology, within an area 1 m sq and begun as part of the Festival at Salisbury in
2016, has attempted to communicate the ‘process’ of archaeology; the textures, colours,
sounds and character of layers, the information that they contain and the way in which this
information is analysed to ‘tell the story’.

1.1.2 In the last three years excavation, recording, and interpretation have been presented to
the public and the finds used to show that even mundane objects can be interesting. This
approach, to bring archaeology to the people as it happens, the use of test pit excavations
to demonstrate archaeology and the idea that interesting archaeology is contained within
most back gardens borrows much from ideas that were championed by the late Mick
Aston and trialled by Channel 4’s Time Team.

1.1.3 The success of the 2016 project prompted a proposal for subsequent work in 2017 to
relocate a ‘long-lost’ gate house at the front of the King’s House. This genuine piece of
excavation within a 1 m test pit also offered opportunity to develop the project into a
structured research programme to investigate the archaeology of the King’s House.

1.1.4 The results presented below describe work in 2018.

1.2 The site

1.2.1 The King’s House forms the premises of the Salisbury and South Wilts Museum which is
located less than 100 m west of Salisbury Cathedral, in the city of Salisbury, Wiltshire.
The west range fronts directly on to the Cathedral Close at 45 m above Ordnance Datum
(aOD) and overlooks an area that is currently covered by a gravel courtyard with lawns,
flower beds and paved areas.

1.2.2 The 2018 test pit abutted the east gable of the north range of the King’s House, which
now houses the museum café (NGR 414129 129495) (Figure 1).

1.2.3 The solid geology is mapped as Chalk, Marl and Flint of the Newhaven Chalk Formation
with overlying Alluvial deposits of clay, sand, and gravel (BGS 2017).

1.3 Archaeological background

1.3.1 The King’s House is a Grade 1 Listed Building and acquired its name following visits by
King James I of England in 1610 and 1613. The initial construction, which was erected in
the 13th or 14th century, formed the Prebendal residence of the Abbot of Sherborne,

1
Doc ref. SMU18.1
 Salisbury Museum, The King’s House, Salisbury, Wiltshire
Test-pit excavation for the 2018 Festival of Archaeology

although the current building dates from the 15th century. Following the Reformation the
property passed to a number of wealthy tenants including Thomas Sadler, Registrar to
Bishops of Sarum, who entertained James I. Sadler added a range of brick with stone
windows to the north end of the west range to coincide with the visits of the monarch
(RCHM 1993).The tenancy passed to Sadler’s son, also Thomas Sadler, in 1634, who
occupied the premises until his death in 1658.

1.3.2 The east elevation of the west range, the main building, comprises two storeys with an
attic. It is built partly of rubble stone and flint with stone dressings, which includes the use
of Hamstone. This distinctive well-cemented, honey-coloured, medium to coarse grained,
strongly bedded Jurassic limestone originates from Ham Hill, Somerset, within the diocese
of Sherborne. The south gable is partly blocked by a modern southern range. Some early
elements remain, including the early 15th-century moulded porch arch.

1.3.3 The north range was originally constructed as a separate single storey building, but is now
of two stories. The lower parts of the façade also contain Hamstone suggesting initial
construction in the 15th century, contemporary with the west range.

1.3.4 An Illustration by John Buckler in 1804 shows that the north range had been extended
further to the east, beyond the gable of the 15th-century structure. A further watercolour of
1807 indicates that in the intervening period this supplementary range had been
demolished. Despite the relatively accurate dating for its demolition nothing survived to
indicate when it was constructed or who commissioned the work.

Recent archaeological investigations in the area

1.3.5 Wessex Archaeology monitored building work at The King’s House in 2013, which
included compiling a photographic record of two interior walls prior to their removal.
Excavations in the back garden by the Avon Valley Archaeological Group (AVAS 2010) as
part of the Festival of Archaeology 2010 recorded a sequence of garden soils dating from
the 17th century and a garden path. Natural gravel was not encountered. The subsequent
Festival of Archaeology Test Pit 2016 (Wessex Archaeology 2018) extended this
sequence to the natural terrace gravel, recovering basal deposits that included 13th-/14th-
century make-up layers, above which the succession of 17th- and 18th-century garden
soils was repeated and overlain by more recent landscaping.

1.3.6 Supplementary work in 2017 provided an opportunity to expand public engagement with
genuine research into the archaeology of the King’s House and rediscover a ‘lost’ gate
house, which fronted onto the cathedral close.

1.3.7 This phase was preceded by a magnetic survey (Wessex Archaeology 2016) and a
supplementary ground penetrating survey (GPS) (Wessex Archaeology 2017) across an
area of 0.08 ha. The latter survey covered 0.05 ha to the rear of the museum (Area 1) and
0.03 ha at the front of the building (Area 2).

1.3.8 The results of the GPR survey, which covered most of the available land at the front of the
King’s House, revealed a series of anomalies which determined the position of a test pit, 1
m sq, (Wessex Archaeology 2018). The results confirmed the location and appearance of
the gate house as well as indicating that it was constructed in the mid-17th century.

2 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

2.1.1 The Festival of Archaeology test pit of 2018 aimed to relocate the wall foundations of the
extended range depicted by Buckler in 1804 and demolished by 1807. Most importantly it
was hoped to date its construction, using artefacts, and confirm the chronological
2
Doc ref. SMU18.1
 Salisbury Museum, The King’s House, Salisbury, Wiltshire
Test-pit excavation for the 2018 Festival of Archaeology

relationships with the presumed earlier 15th-century range. Successful relocation of the
foundations would offer an opportunity to assess the condition, survival and construction
of the structure.

3 METHODOLOGY

3.1 Fieldwork methodology

3.1.1 The 2018 test pit was positioned over the presumed wall line of the range shown by
Buckler in 1804 at the intersection with the east gable of the present north range. The
location was scanned for any obvious drains or live services prior to excavation. The
excavated area was determined by the removal of two paving slabs, which provided an
area 1.24 m N-S and 0.80 m E-W. This was considered to be of sufficient size to relocate
the wall foundation, sample any foundation trench that might contain artefacts related to
construction and identify earlier deposits.

3.1.2 All excavation was undertaken by hand. Spoil was stored separately at the side of the test
pit for reinstatement at the conclusion of the work. All records were compiled using
Wessex Archaeology’s standard pro forma recording system with plans and sections
drawn at scales appropriate for the work. A digital archive of photographs was also
maintained. The test pit was located relative to existing standing buildings and levelled at
the completion of the work.

3.1.3 The work was recorded using the site code SMU18, and carried out over two days, 21–22
July 2018.

4 ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESULTS

4.1 Introduction
4.1.1 Figure 1 shows the location and plan of the test pit with the west-facing section. Context
numbers were allocated from 200 to avoid confusion with 2016 numbers, which were
listed from 100 or 2017 numbers which were sequenced from zero. Full descriptions of the
excavated contexts are given in Appendix 1.

4.2 Stratigraphy
4.2.1 The test pit was located within a paved area comprising square limestone flags. Two flags
(201) were lifted by staff at Salisbury and South Wilts Museum prior to excavation and
were reinstated at the completion of the work.

4.2.2 The flags were laid on a bed of dark grey furnace waste (202), up to 0.10 m thick,
containing clinker, which served as a foundation layer for the paving. The bed increased
to 0.20 m thick against the gable wall of the extant building, possibly to assist drainage.

4.2.3 Removal of this foundation material revealed a deposit of grey brown silty clay, (203) on
the north side and (205) on the south, which was bisected by an obsolete rain-water
culvert (204). Layers 203 and 205, which were 0.23 m thick, contained flecks of mortar
and chalk with redeposited fragments of CBM (tile). This deposit probably represents a
19th century garden soil.

4.2.4 The culvert (204) was aligned NE-SW and extended 0.70m from the east edge of the test
pit. It was constructed using cast, ceramic concave-sectioned gully pipes that were
flanked by two courses of hand-made, unfrogged bricks and capped by reused grey roof
slates or limestone slabs. The use of grey slate as a roofing material is not common in
3
Doc ref. SMU18.1
 Salisbury Museum, The King’s House, Salisbury, Wiltshire
Test-pit excavation for the 2018 Festival of Archaeology

Salisbury until the middle or later part of the 19th century, which provided a broad
construction date for the culvert.

4.2.5 The culvert was constructed within a shallow foundation trench the north side of which
could not be defined where it was cut through layer 203 and backfilled with the same silty
clay. The profile was most clearly visible on the south side where it cut through the upper
courses of the underlying wall foundation (206). Definition of the upper edge was again
indistinct but could be inferred by the presence of fragments of grey roofing slate within
the backfill (205).

4.2.6 Deposits 203 and 205 could both be traced to the surface of the wall foundation (206),
which measured approximately 0.58 m wide at the top. The south face was almost vertical
however the north side splayed out towards the base, increasing the width to 0.70 m. The
foundation was constructed of coursed flint nodules set in yellow, gritty, sandy mortar. The
insertion of culvert (204) had reduced the surviving depth of foundations to five courses,
approximately 0.25 m deep, however in the extreme SE corner of the trench seven
courses were visible, increasing the depth of surviving masonry to 0.40 m.

4.2.7 The foundation was constructed using relatively small, generally 0.10 m long, sub rounded
flint nodules many of which were covered by a developed yellow stain, indicating a source
from fluvial gravel. The north face of the foundation also included fragments of pitched
reused roof tile.

4.2.8 It was possible to insert the blade of a trowel beneath the lowest course of flints to confirm
the base of the foundation; however, the construction clearly extended beneath the
existing gable façade making it impossible to confirm the chronological relationships with,
or construction of, the assumed earlier part of the range. This suggests that the present
gable, which features brick within its construction, was totally rebuilt following the
demolition of the range after 1804.

4.2.9 The north edge of the foundation trench [209] for wall foundation (206) was identified
where it was cut through a make-up deposit of grey brown silty clay (207). This deposit
contained large quantities of medieval roof tiles, which were all laid horizontally. Identical
tiles were also found in the backfill of foundation trench [209] but were vertical and clearly
defining the edge. Three conjoining sherds of pottery of probable 16th-/17th-century date
were recovered from the fill of the foundation trench [209].

4.2.10 No comparable evidence was identified on the south side of the wall foundation where
similar grey brown silty clay (208) contained no roof tile. This made it impossible to
establish whether the edge of the foundation trench lay beyond the limits of the test pit or
at the face of the wall foundation.

5 FINDS

5.1 Introduction
5.1.1 The test pit produced a small assemblage of finds, ranging in date from medieval to post-
medieval. The finds belong to types which occur commonly across the city, but this
assemblage is overwhelmingly dominated by building materials, almost to the exclusion of
domestic refuse or any other category of finds.

5.1.2 All finds have been quantified by material type within each context, and the results are
presented in Appendix 2. Note that some finds have been recorded as belonging either to
layer 207 (make-up layer) or to layer 210 (backfill of wall foundation cut [209]) – the line of

4
Doc ref. SMU18.1
 Salisbury Museum, The King’s House, Salisbury, Wiltshire
Test-pit excavation for the 2018 Festival of Archaeology

the putative cut could not be discerned at an upper level, and finds from the two layers
may have been mixed.

5.2 Pottery
5.2.1 Pottery was restricted to 11 sherds (weighing 159 g). One is medieval, the remainder
post-medieval/modern.

5.2.2 The medieval sherd is in Coarse Border ware, a white-firing coarseware from the
Surrey/Hampshire border industry (Pearce and Vince 1988). This ware appears in
Salisbury from around the middle of the 14th century, but never forms more than a very
minor component of the pottery assemblage.

5.2.3 There are eight sherds of earthenware. One is in the distinctive pale-firing fabric of the
Verwood industry of east Dorset; this is an unglazed body sherd that probably dates prior
to the 18th century. Other sherds are all redwares. Three conjoining sherds form part of
the base of a partially glazed vessel of uncertain form, possibly a jar. These sherds, which
are provisionally dated as 16th-/17th-century provide the closest dating evidence for the
construction of wall 206, occurring in the fill of construction trench 209.

5.2.4 The remaining two sherds are from a creamware plate in ‘Royal’ pattern, dating to the
later 18th or 19th century. These two sherds came from culvert backfill 205.

5.3 Ceramic Building Material

5.3.1 Ceramic building material (CBM) dominated the assemblage (94 fragments, weighing
18,317 g). This total included four complete or almost complete bricks. Three of these
formed part of the construction of culvert 204, and the fourth, from backfill 205, almost
certainly also derived from the culvert. The bricks are not all of the same type, and two are
damaged; they appear to have been selected on a random basis, perhaps reusing bricks
from elsewhere. One is a shallow brick (thickness 50 mm), possibly a paviour, in a yellow
fabric. The others are fired to an orange-red colour; one is overfired dark red. One is an
arch brick or voussoir, and the other two are standard handmade, unfrogged bricks, but of
slightly different sizes (225–30 x 110–10 x 65 mm).

5.3.2 One other small brick fragment was recovered, but otherwise the CBM is made up of
fragments of flat roof (peg) tile. Apart from one fragment from foundation layer 202, which
is in an evenly coloured and regularly made orange-red fabric of post-medieval date, all of
the roof tile is medieval, and can be so dated from the use of coarse, poorly wedged and
pale-firing fabrics with prominent iron oxides. A few examples are partially glazed. Where
present, peg holes are round, and are relatively closely-spaced in pairs, sometimes off-
centre. Surviving widths range from 65 mm to 75 mm (there are no surviving lengths).
Peg-tiles were almost certainly made locally; one source is documented at Alderbury from
the mid-14th to the late 15th century (Hare 1991), but either this or some other local
source must have been supplying the city from its foundation, as roof tile fragments
appear from the earliest levels. The peg tiles occurred in most of the layers excavated, but
were concentrated in make-up layer 207 (58 fragments). Four larger fragments from the
fill of wall foundation cut 209 were found resting vertically, and were thought thus to
represent the edge of the cut – they were almost certainly derived from the make-up layer
through which the foundation was cut. The tiles from 210, and some of the fragments from
207, appear to have suffered firing faults, with surfaces spalled off and laminating,
although some of these have also been used in some manner, as shown by mortar traces.
It is possible that these ‘substandard’ and/or reused tiles were dumped in layer 207 as
consolidation, perhaps prior to construction of the northern wing. A similar hypothesis was

5
Doc ref. SMU18.1
 Salisbury Museum, The King’s House, Salisbury, Wiltshire
Test-pit excavation for the 2018 Festival of Archaeology

proposed for the lowest excavated layer in the 2017 test pit, which also contained some
possible tile ‘seconds’ (Wessex Archaeology 2018).

5.4 Glass
5.4.1 One fragment from a hand-blown or mould-blown green wine bottle came from culvert
backfill 2095. This is of 18th- or early 19th-century date.

5.4.2 Of particular interest, from layer 207/210 (deriving either from the make-up layer, or from
the putative foundation trench that cut through it), were two small fragments of vessel
glass. These are heavily degraded, almost to a state of devitrification, and are completely
opaque with pitted surfaces; the condition suggests that the vessel was made of unstable
potash glass. The fragments appear to belong to the basal angle of a small, thin-walled
drinking vessel, probably the bowl of a stemmed goblet, with mould-blown vertical ribs or
‘fins’ extending around the basal angle. This could be a rare survival of a medieval vessel:
comparable examples are known from the late 13th to 14th century (Tyson 2000, fig. 5,
g1–g3).

5.5 Copper Alloy and Worked Bone

5.5.1 A group of four small objects (three of copper alloy and one of bone) were recovered very
close together towards the northern edge of the test pit, deriving either from make-up
layer 205, or the fill of foundation cut 209. It is possible that they were all deposited
together.

5.5.2 The three copper alloy objects comprise two pins and one toilet implement. One of the
pins has a wire-wound head (Margeson 1993, 11, type 3); the second is missing its head
(lengths 102 mm and 110 mm respectively). Drawn wire pins such as these were
originally thought to have been introduced to England in the mid-16th century, but were
subsequently shown to have been available three centuries earlier, based on evidence
from Winchester (Biddle and Barclay 1990, 560–1). Pins were used to fasten clothing (in
lieu of buttons) and for women’s head-dress. These pins cannot be particularly closely
datable, but as the size of pins decreased significantly from the 16th century, so these
examples are likely to be medieval, somewhere between 13th and 15th century.

5.5.3 The toilet implement combines an ear-scoop at one end with a nail-cleaner or tooth-pick at
the other (Margeson 1993, cat nos 398–9); the shaft is made from a length of wire. In
Norwich, implements of this sort made from wire were dated to the 15th/early 16th century
(earlier examples were made from metal strips).

5.5.4 The worked bone object is a short length of a thin shank, pointed at one end, probably
from another pin.

5.6 Animal Bone

5.6.1 Eleven fragments of animal bone were recovered. These include cattle, sheep and bird
(probably domestic fowl).

5.7 Other Finds

5.7.1 Other finds comprise very small quantities of slag (probably clinker), roofing slate, iron
(small collar or ferrule of unknown function) and shell (one oyster shell)

6
Doc ref. SMU18.1
 Salisbury Museum, The King’s House, Salisbury, Wiltshire
Test-pit excavation for the 2018 Festival of Archaeology

6 DISCUSSION

6.1.1 The 2018 test pit at The King’s House was designed to relocate the wall line of the
extension to the north range that was depicted by John Buckler in 1804, but was
demolished by 1807. The challenge offered an opportunity to confirm the presence of the
foundations, document the construction techniques, assess the chronological
relationships with the extant building and establish the construction date of the former
range.

6.1.2 The wall foundation was relocated successfully, confirming Buckler’s record. Significantly
when the wall line, as revealed, is projected to the east it can be seen to coincide with a
feature that was tentatively identified by GPR as a probable drain (Wessex Archaeology
2017). Re-evaluation of the geophysical data suggests that this probable drain represents
the wall of the former range (Fig. 1), including its internal subdivisions. This revision
makes it possible to trace the footprint of the range to the east boundary of the property,
fronting onto the Close.

6.1.3 The extension to the east range was apparently constructed within an area that had been
consolidated in the medieval period. Large slabs of broken roof tiles together with the
absence of post medieval finds reinforce this evidence. Activity of similar date and content
characterised the primary layers in the 2017 test pit.

6.1.4 These repeating pattern contrasts with the scarcity of made-up ground to the rear of the
King’ House, as revealed in the 2016 test pit, where deposits were characterised by
garden soil containing domestic waste. This simple observation provides a model for land
use at the King’s House, displaying the public aspect of the front façade while the rear
apparently remained relatively undeveloped or private.

6.1.5 Pottery from the backfill of the construction trench suggests that the ‘lost’ range was
probably erected in the 16th-17th century. The results of the excavation also demonstrated
that the wall foundation was constructed entirely of flint and tile, with no evidence of brick.
It is suggestive, but not indicative, that the absence of brick, which was used extensively
by Thomas Sadler I in the early 17th century, may hint at a construction date in the 16th
century.

6.1.6 The King’s House was occupied during this period by Hugh Powell and Thomas Sadler I.
Both occupants are known to have altered the premises; in 1572 documents relating to
subletting the tenancy record repairs and new buildings by Powell, while Sadler
constructed the brick cross wing to accommodate King James I. He was also responsible
for the addition of a large stable with hayloft in the east part of the site adjoining the road.
Survey by RCHM (1993) considered that the upper storey of the extant building may also
have been added in the late 16th century and conjectured (ibid. Fig. 151) that the
extension was also in place by 1600.

6.1.7 While Powell or Sadler can be credited with construction of the extended range the
function is less certain. The Parliamentary Survey of 1649 catalogues a number of
domestic chambers and stables, any one of which might apply to those on the north side
of the site.

6.1.8 The excavation failed to confirm that the extant north range predated the now demolished
range. The foundations of the latter continued beneath the present gable, which was
apparently reconstructed on a shallow plinth.

7
Doc ref. SMU18.1
 Salisbury Museum, The King’s House, Salisbury, Wiltshire
Test-pit excavation for the 2018 Festival of Archaeology

6.1.9 The precise date at which these modifications to the gable took place is uncertain but may
have coincided with the demolition of the gate house in 1805. This redevelopment
undoubtedly required major alterations to the remaining parts of the north range. The
present gable is of stone and flint but also includes relatively large quantities of brick. The
window which now fills the upper storey of the east gable near the former roof line may
also have been inserted. Further modifications have undoubtedly been undertaken
subsequently; Bucklers illustration of 1807 shows the north range with a hipped roof
whereas the range now has a straight gable.

6.1.10 This most recent episode in the Festival of Archaeology Test Pit story set out with a
simple research agenda which was met, in part, successfully. The results of this work are
of sufficient value to be viewed in isolation; nevertheless they have benefitted
immeasurably from results and knowledge gleaned from the previous years’ work.
Additional investigations are required to examine the foundations of the extant north
range.

7 STORAGE AND CURATION

7.1 Museum
7.1.1 The project archive, which is currently held at the offices of Wessex Archaeology in
Salisbury, will be deposited in due course with the Salisbury Museum, under the site code
SMU18, and in combination with the archives from the test pits excavated in 2016 and
2017.

7.2 Preparation of the archive

7.2.1 The archive, which includes paper records, graphics, artefacts and digital data, will be
prepared following the standard conditions for the acceptance of excavated
archaeological material by Salisbury Museum, and in general following nationally
recommended guidelines (SMA 1995; CIfA 2014; Brown 2011; ADS 2013).

7.2.2 All archive elements are marked with the site code, and a full index will be prepared. The
physical archive currently comprises the following:

 1 small airtight plastic tub of artefacts, ordered by material type

 1 file of paper records and A4 graphics

7.3 Selection policy

7.3.1 Wessex Archaeology follows the guidelines set out in Selection, Retention and Dispersal
of Archaeological Collections (Society of Museum Archaeologists 1993), which allows for
the discard of selected artefact and ecofact categories that are not considered to warrant
any future analysis.

7.3.2 In this instance, the finds belong to types already well represented and well documented
within the city, and earlier excavations have provided good datasets of this material, in
particular pottery, animal bone, ceramic building material, glass and clay tobacco pipes.
This small assemblage adds little that is new to the known material culture of Salisbury,
and as such, most of it does not warrant retention for long-term curation. Selected items,
however, will be deposited (copper alloy and worked bone objects, possible medieval
vessel glass, pottery used for dating evidence).

8
Doc ref. SMU18.1
 Salisbury Museum, The King’s House, Salisbury, Wiltshire
Test-pit excavation for the 2018 Festival of Archaeology

7.4 Security copy

7.4.1 In line with current best practice (e.g. Brown 2011), on completion of the project a security
copy of the written records will be prepared, in the form of a digital PDF/A file. PDF/A is an
ISO-standardised version of the Portable Document Format (PDF) designed for the digital
preservation of electronic documents through omission of features ill-suited to long-term
archiving.

7.5 Copyright
Archive and report copyright
7.5.1 The full copyright of the written/illustrative/digital archive relating to the project will be
retained by Wessex Archaeology under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 with
all rights reserved. The client will be licenced to use each report for the purposes that it
was produced in relation to the project as described in the specification. The museum,
however, will be granted an exclusive licence for the use of the archive for educational
purposes, including academic research, providing that such use shall be non-profitmaking,
and conforms to the Copyright and Related Rights Regulations 2003. In some instances,
certain regional museums may require absolute transfer of copyright, rather than a
licence.

7.5.2 Information relating to the project will be deposited with the HER where it can be freely
copied without reference to Wessex Archaeology for the purposes of archaeological
research or Development Control within the planning process.

Third party data copyright

7.5.3 This document and the project archive may contain material that is non-Wessex
Archaeology copyright (eg, Ordnance Survey, British Geological Survey, Crown
Copyright), or the intellectual property of third parties, which Wessex Archaeology are
able to provide for limited reproduction under the terms of our own copyright licences, but
for which copyright itself is non-transferable by Wessex Archaeology. Users remain bound
by the conditions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 with regard to multiple
copying and electronic dissemination of such material.

9
Doc ref. SMU18.1
 Salisbury Museum, The King’s House, Salisbury, Wiltshire
Test-pit excavation for the 2018 Festival of Archaeology

REFERENCES

ADS 2013, Caring for Digital Data in Archaeology: a guide to good practice, Archaeology Data
Service & Digital Antiquity Guides to Good Practice

AVAS 2010 Report on the excavation at the rear of Salisbury and South Wiltshire Museum, July
2010: an investigation by the Avon Valley Archaeological Society. Unpublished archive
report Avon Valley Archaeological Society

Biddle, M and Barclay, K 1990 ‘Sewing pins’ and wire, in M. Biddle (ed.), Artefacts from Medieval
Winchester Parts I and ii: Object and Economy in Medieval Winchester, Oxford:
Winchester Studies 7, 560–71

British Geological Survey [BGS 2017], Geology of Britain online viewer

http://mapapps.bgs.ac.uk/geologyof britain/home.html [accessed 31 May 2017]

Brown, D H 2011 Archaeological Archives: a guide to best practice in creation, compilation,

transfer and curation. Archaeological Archives Forum (revised edition)

CIfA 2014 Standard and Guidance for the Creation, Compilation, Transfer and Deposition of
Archaeological Archives. Chartered Institute for Archaeologists

Hare, J N 1991 The growth of the roof-tile industry in later medieval Wessex, Medieval Archaeol 3,
86–103

Margeson, S 1993 Norwich Households: medieval and post-medieval finds from Norwich Survey
excavations 1971–78, East Anglian Archaeol 58

RCHM 1993 Salisbury. The Houses of the Close. London, HMSO

SMA 1995 Towards an Accessible Archaeological Archive, Society of Museum Archaeologists

Tyson, R 2002 Medieval Glass Vessels Found in England c AD 1200–1500, Counc Brit Archaeol
Res Rep 121

Wessex Archaeology 2016 The Salisbury Museum, Salisbury, Wiltshire. Detailed Gradiometer
Survey Report. Unpublished Wessex Archaeology Client Report Ref. 15009.02

Wessex Archaeology 2017 Salisbury Museum, Salisbury, Wiltshire. Ground Penetrating Radar
Survey Report. Unpublished Wessex Archaeology Client Report Ref. 15009.01

Wessex Archaeology 2018 Salisbury Museum, The King’s House, Salisbury, Wiltshire. Test-pit
excavation for the Festival of Archaeology. Unpublished Wessex Archaeology Client Report
Ref. 17039

10
Doc ref. SMU18.1
 Salisbury Museum, The King’s House, Salisbury, Wiltshire
Test-pit excavation for the 2018 Festival of Archaeology

APPENDICES

Appendix 1: Context descriptions

Context Context Type Description Depth (m)

201 Layer Paving slabs 0.05
202 Layer Foundation/formation layer. Dark grey furnace waste with clinker 0.10
203 Layer Soil accumulation. Grey-brown silty clay with mortar and chalk flecks . 0.23
Finds predominantly roof tile
204 Structure Brick built culvert, cut through 203 0.20
205 Layer Grey brown silty clay, as 203, probably includes backfill for construction
of culvert 204; Finds include grey roof slate
206 Fill Wall foundation. Predominantly five courses of flint nodules in yellow 0.46
sandy mortar. 0.58 m wide
207 Layer Grey brown silty clay with plentiful chalk flecks. Near complete 0.30
horizontal medieval roof tiles
208 Layer Make-up layer or backfill of wall foundation trench. Grey brown silty clay 0.29
south of 206 with plentiful chalk flecks
209 Cut Wall foundation trench. Filled with 206 and 208
210 Fill Backfill of wall foundation trench on north side. Grey brown silty clay 0.25
with chalk pellets. Vertical medieval roof tiles.

11
Doc ref. SMU18.1
 Salisbury Museum, The King’s House, Salisbury, Wiltshire
Test-pit excavation for the 2018 Festival of Archaeology

Appendix 2: Quantification of finds by context

Context Material type No. Wt. (g) Comments
202 slag 4 467 fuel ash slag/clinker
202 pottery 5 67 3 conjoining sherds from cylindrical mug
202 CBM 1 86 post-med roof tile
202 copper alloy 1 25 rectangular buckle with end of belt attached
medieval roof tile, 1 glazed; 1 width (65mm), worn &
203 CBM 11 1204 mortared all over (including edges)
203 pottery 2 42 post-med redware, 1 glazed
204 pottery 1 26 Verwood-type earthenware
204 animal bone 4 136 Bird (prob domestic fowl); cattle
almost complete brick (edge broken; 240 x 110 x
204 CBM 1 2246 50mm); ?paviour; yellow fabric
complete brick (230 x 100 x 65mm); dark orange-red,
204 CBM 1 3107 handmade; creased edges
almost complete brick (edge & corner damaged; 225 x
204 CBM 1 2912 110 x 65mm); orange-red, handmade
205 CBM 4 326 medieval roof tile
205 CBM 1 100 brick fragment
205 stone 5 198 roofing slate frags
205 glass 1 26 green wine bottle glass, body fragment, C18/early C19
205 pottery 2 14 creamware plate, scalloped edge ('Royal' pattern)
complete brick, voussoir (240 x 105 x 60-70mm); dark
205 CBM 1 2999 red (overfired), poorly wedged fabric
207 pottery 1 10 Coarse Border ware
medieval roof tile, 3 glazed; 1 width 75mm),
207 CBM 58 3385 substandard
208 CBM 11 339 medieval roof tile, 1 glazed
208 Iron 1 17 small collar or ferrule
medieval roof tile, 4 widths (65mm, 65mm, 75mm), all
substandard; group of tiles up against ?edge of
210 CBM 4 1613 foundation cut
207/210 animal bone 7 21 Sheep; bird (prob domestic fowl)
207/210 shell 1 4 oyster (R valve)
207/210 copper alloy 1 1 toilet implement
207/210 copper alloy 1 1 pin with wire-wound head, shaft in 2 frags
207/210 copper alloy 1 1 pin shaft (head missing)
207/210 animal bone 1 1 very thin shaft of pin/needle
very degraded vessel glass, from ribbed base of ?wine
207/210 glass 2 1 goblet bowl, ?C13/C14

12
Doc ref. SMU18.1
 Test Pit

Ground penetrating radar

survey area

Archaeological feature
St. Mary’s 129600 Possible archaeological
Cathedral
Test feature
pit
Probable service
King’s House

129400
The Close
Riv
e
rA
414000

416000

King’s House
von

0 200 m 0 10 m

207
Cut 209
Drain 204
210

Wall 206
Plate
n
f sectio

208
205
Line o

S N
45.26 mOD

202 201

Drain 204 Flint

205 Brick or tile
203 Slate
210
207 Wall 206 208
0 0.5 m

Cut 209

Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2018
This material is for client report only © Wessex Archaeology. No unauthorised reproduction.

Date: 30/08/2018 Revision Number: 0

Scale: @ A4 Illustrator: RG

Path: Y:\Users\Rob Goller\For_phil\Salisbury_museum\Festival_2018\Salisbury_museum03.ai

Test pit location with GPR results, and plan, section and photograph of the test pit Figure 1
 wessex
archaeology
Wessex Archaeology Ltd registered office Portway House, Old Sarum Park, Salisbury, Wiltshire SP4 6EB
Tel: 01722 326867 Fax: 01722 337562 [email protected] www. wessexarch.co.uk
FS 606559

Wessex Archaeology Ltd is a company limited by guarantee registered in England, No. 1712772 and is a Registered Charity in England and Wales, No. 287786;
and in Scotland, Scottish Charity No. SC042630. Registered Office: Portway House, Old Sarum Park, Salisbury, Wilts SP4 6EB