The Absurdity of Reality: Case Study in The Meaninglessness of All Views

The absurdity of
reality
(case study in the
meaninglessness of all
views)
By poet
colin leslie dean
The absurdity of
reality
(case study in the
meaninglessness of all
views)
By poet
colin leslie dean
List of free Erotic Poetry Books by
Gamahucher Press by colin leslie dean
Australias leading erotic poet free for
download
http://www.scribd.com/doc/35520015/List-ofErotic-Poetry-Books-by-Gamahucher-Press
gamahucher press Victoria Australia
geelong west 2016
free verse poem

The
absurdity
of
reality-via
Aristotelian logic
All thinking via Aristotelian
logic leads to the absurdity, or
the meaninglessness of all views
This case study is meant to give
weight to the demonstration that all
conceptualisations, all products of
thinking collapse into absurdity, or
meaninglessness if Aristotelian
logic is an epistemic condition of
truth which this thesis denies
Aristotelian logic contradicts the

real world. There are phenomena in
the real world which according to the
law of non-contradiction can not be
there-yet they are ie the wave-particle
nature of light. Here is another
phenomenon which is there, does
exist and contradicts the law of noncontradiction These phenomena show
the limits of Aristotelian logic
With
Kants
transcendental
idealism, according to Hegel, we get

the idea that the contradictions in the
world are put there by the categories

of the Understanding. In other
words it is thought or reason that
create the contradiction in the world not
the world itself. Hegel claimed instead
that the contradictions had their seat in
the
very
nature
of
the
Aristotelian logic would

contradiction can be true yet
world
say no
reality
contradicts that truth for In reality a

contradiction can be true. Is this glass
half full or is it half empty as the
Deans glass of the poet colin leslie
dean which no one has seen before he
points out this Deans glass is in
itself both half empty and half full

both
simultaneously but that does
contradict the law of non-contradiction

of Aristotelian logic which does say a
contradiction cant be true but the Dean
glass exists it is true
in reality a contradiction can exist

and be true thus Aristotelian logic
by reality is shown not to be true
this finding by colin leslie dean has a
number of consequences
1) Aristotelian
logic
does
not
mirror reality it infact creates a

reality
Aristotelian
logics
reality is a reality that does not

correspond
Aristotelian
to
our
logic
reality.
creates
particular ontology and reality

due to an inbuilt ontology in
Aristotelian logic
2) Aristotelian logic infact creates
a reality/ontology based on the
ontology of Aristotelian logic
namely the law of identity and
the law of non-contradiction ie

in Aristotelian logics reality
there
are
essences
and
contradictions leading to
structure
of
dualisms
reality/ontology
and essences
no
a
this
with dualisms
created
by
Aristotelian logic as Deans

glass shows is not the reality
we
live
in
-Just
as
Newtonian physics is not the

physics of the universe just as
Euclidean geometry is not the
10
geometry
of
the
universe
Aristotelian logic is not the logic

of the universe A Dilemma
physicists
logic
to
uses
Aristotelian
arrive
at
paradox/contradiction which they

say
exists
but
their
very
Aristotelian logic they use to get

that says the paradox/contradiction
cant exist -as with Deans glass either a) they abide by the rules of
Aristotelian logic and say the
paradox/contradiction
cant
exist
which would mean they are wrong
11
or have made a mistake in saying

paradox/contradiction exists or b)
they say the paradox/contradiction
does exist but then that makes
invalid the Aristotelian logic they
have used to get the result that the
paradox/contradiction does exists
thus if their reasonings are invalid
how can they logically know the
paradox/contradiction does exists
The
scientists
accept
their
paradox/contradiction conclusion to
be
true/exist
which
their
Aristotelian logic they use to
12
arrive at that paradox/contradiction

conclusion says is not true/exist ie
in Schrdingers cat
it is both
dead and alive at the same time

now the Aristotelian logic they
use
to
get
this
paradox/contradiction denies that

the paradox/contradiction can exist
Yet physicists say it does exist
thus we have the dilemma as above
The way out of the dilemma is
just to see that Aristotelian logic
is not the logic of the universewhich scientists assume it is
13
without proving it is In other

words scientists use Aristotelian
logic because they assume it is the
logic of the universe but they dont
prove Aristotelian logic is the
logic of the universe thus their
unproven belief that Aristotelian
logic is the logic of the universe is
just
faith
based-yet
some
scientists will criticize religions

for being faith based
3) If Aristotelian logic as it did

for
the
nihilists
and
existentialists leads you to see
14
the
universe/reality
meaningless
Aristotelian
as
just
logic
drop
for
as
Deans glass shows logic does

not mirror our universe/reality
for this logic has no epistemic
value in making claims about
our reality-which is different to
the
reality
created
by
Aristotelian logic
4) Aristotelian logic is not an

epistemic condition of truth as -
15
reality can show that logic is

wrongas Deans glass shows
5) if
Aristotelian
logic
says
something cant exist this does

not mean that it does not exist
as Deans glass shows
6) Science believes the universe is
logical
ie
Aristotelian
logic
[without proof]- Deans glass

shows
they
are
wrong
in
assuming this
7) Philosophers
and
scientists
believe that if something ends in
16
contradiction or is contradictory
then it cant be true- Deans
glass shows they are wrong in
assuming this
8) Deans
glass
shows
the
universe can be contradictory

Thus all those philosophical
and scientific arguments that
dismiss systems that end in
contradiction as not being true
become untenable Thus we have
then that all those systems
dismissed
for
being
in
17
contradiction may be in fact be

true nevertheless
9) The
fact
of
Deans
glass
means that universe becomes a

much
more
interesting
thing
where in terms of logic it can

be totally or partially illogical
irrational made up of things etc
that in terms of Aristotelian
logic are a contradiction
10) The
means
fact
of
that
Deans
the
illogical can be true
glass
irrational
18
11) The
fact
means
of
that
Deans
glass
science
and
philosophy lose their right to

tell us what the universe is as
in their systems the universe is
assumed
to
be
logical
ie
Aristotelian logic where in fact
we see it can be illogical ending

in contradiction
12) The
fact
of
Deans
glass
means we have to drop the belief

philosophy and science are the
only true adjudicators of what
19
the universe is we have to drop

the
belief
in
the
universal
of
the
scientific
applicability
method and approach, and the

view
that
empirical
constitutes
the
science
most
"authoritative" worldview or the

most valuable part of human
learningto the exclusion of
other viewpoints. -As these
beliefs
are
based
upon
Aristotelian logic and its laws
ie
exist
that a contradiction cant

since
the
universe
is
20
logical ie contradiction free-but

Deans
glass
shows
these
beliefs are wrong

13) Deans glass shows we must
face the universe with no help
from logic- perhaps even to face
the
universe
by
dropping
Aristotelian logic and its laws-
which can contradict reality

14) \It makes one wonder what
Aristotle would have done if
he was aware of Deans glass
when he was working it his law
21
of non-contradiction-as Deans
glass proves his
law of non-
contradiction is not true-perhaps

perhaps
Western philosophy
and science would have gone in

other directions
Now the real interesting thing

about deans glass is why no one has
seen
the
consequence
contradiction-and
before .This half/full
glass has been around for decades

perhaps
centuries-
with
people
22
asking is it half full or is it half

empty
Now
philosophy
Phd
Professors
student
of
post
doctoral the so called brightest minds

in the land etc not one of them has
seen what colin leslie dean has seenthe deans glass- and the question is
why not? perhaps some tentative
answers might be for the sociology
of knowledge social psychology etc
1) they are all sheep just going along

with old patterns of thinking
23
2)
they
dont
really
have
critical/analytic mind
3) they cant think simply and see
simple
solutions
and
simple
consequences they are just to much

of sophisticated thinkers that they
cant see real simple problems or
simple consequences
For those who want to see simple
contradictions-and
there
consequences that no one has seen

before
24
more to follow
for those interested in more works

pointing out the meaninglessness of
all products of human thinking then
read the following
other
case
studies
in
the
meaninglessness of all view

The meaninglessness of mathematics
http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wpcontent/uploads/MATHEMATICS.pdf
The meaninglessness of all the

products of human thinking
25
http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.co
m/books/philosophy/contentlessthoug
ht.pdf
the meaninglessness of science +
mathematics
http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/books/phi
losophy/Absurd_math_science4.pdf
Absurdity of logic
m/books/philosophy/logiccentrismboo
k.pdf
Absurdity of natural selection
26
m/books/philosophy/Natural_selecti
on.pdf
Godels
theorem
ends
in
meaninglessness
m/books/philosophy/GODEL5.pdf
Godels
theorem
ends
in
meaninglessness
m/books/philosophy/GODEL5.pdf

The Absurdity of Reality: Case Study in The Meaninglessness of All Views

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Absurdity of Reality: Case Study in The Meaninglessness of All Views

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Absurdity of Reality: Case Study in The Meaninglessness of All Views

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

The absurdity of

free verse poem

Aristotelian logic contradicts the

idealism, according to Hegel, we get

world are put there by the categories

Aristotelian logic would

contradicts that truth for In reality a

points out this Deans glass is in

itself both half empty and half full

simultaneously but that does

contradict the law of non-contradiction

in reality a contradiction can exist

mirror reality it infact creates a

reality is a reality that does not

particular ontology and reality

the law of non-contradiction ie

Aristotelian logic as Deans

Newtonian physics is not the

Aristotelian logic is not the logic

paradox/contradiction which they

Aristotelian logic they use to get

which would mean they are wrong

or have made a mistake in saying

Aristotelian logic they use to

arrive at that paradox/contradiction

dead and alive at the same time

paradox/contradiction denies that

without proving it is In other

scientists will criticize religions

3) If Aristotelian logic as it did

existentialists leads you to see

Deans glass shows logic does

4) Aristotelian logic is not an

reality can show that logic is

something cant exist this does

[without proof]- Deans glass

believe that if something ends in

universe can be contradictory

contradiction may be in fact be

means that universe becomes a

where in terms of logic it can

illogical can be true

philosophy lose their right to

Aristotelian logic where in fact

we see it can be illogical ending

means we have to drop the belief

the universe is we have to drop

method and approach, and the

"authoritative" worldview or the

Aristotelian logic and its laws

that a contradiction cant

logical ie contradiction free-but

beliefs are wrong

Aristotelian logic and its laws-

which can contradict reality

contradiction is not true-perhaps

and science would have gone in

Now the real interesting thing