University of Manitoba

Req #

ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND

SYSTEMS COMMISSIONING

Section 16995
Page 1

1.1

SCOPE
.1
The Physical Plant Department at the University of Manitoba has implemented a Quality
Commissioning Program (QCP) that involves the review and verification of construction and
renovation projects to ensure all aspects meet the quality standards set by the University.
.2
The Quality Commissioning Program is a comprehensive process that starts at the pre-design
phase and continues through the post construction phase. Re-commissioning of the
commissioned installations is performed every 5 years. For this reason, the initial commissioning
process and the resulting documentation is critical to ensure that complete and accurate recommissioning can take place in the following years.
.3
Under this contract all electrical systems shall be fully commissioned for compliance to the design
documentation and specified performance. Documentation forms shall be prepared and be
completed for each system and piece of equipment. Satisfactory equipment verification and
performance forms shall be submitted when work is complete and they will be signed off by the
University of Manitoba when accepted. Sample data sheets are attached which provide
representative information sheets for electrical items.
.4
A Commissioning Schedule shall be prepared and be submitted for approval within 90 calendar
days of contract award. This schedule shall cover all commissioning phases and provide a
timeline, milestones, and define points of responsibility.
.5
All equipment supplied to this project will be checked prior to installation to ensure that the
delivered product is as specified before it can be released for installation. An Equipment Form
shall be prepared, completed, and be submitted for each piece of equipment when found to be
satisfactory. See attached sample Equipment Forms at the end of this Section.
.6
All equipment and system installations shall be examined and functionally tested for compliance
with design intent. An Installation Form shall be prepared, completed, and be submitted for each
piece of equipment when found to be satisfactory. See attached sample Installation Forms at the
end of this Section.
.7
Once the supplied equipment has been verified to be in compliance with the design intent, and
the equipment has been properly installed and operation verified, the Commissioning program
moves on to verify equipment and system performance for compliance with design. This portion
of the work requires the submittal of Performance Form when satisfactory performance has
been achieved. See attached sample Performance Forms at the end of this section.

1.2

RESPONSIBILITIES
.1
The Contractor shall:
.1
Provide all coordination required to schedule and coordinate all commissioning activities.
Due to interdependency of the various systems and items of equipment, significant
coordination will be required to facilitate commissioning.
.2
Prepare and implement a Commissioning Plan:
.3
Prepare all commissioning forms based on the examples provided and modified to suit
the actual equipment involved on this project.
.4
The Contractor will be responsible for the participation of the mechanical and electrical
sub-trades and their respective specialists in providing the services described in the
commissioning documents delivered to the schedule in the commissioning plan.
.5
The Contractor shall prepare a commissioning plan which includes equipment
performance verification forms and a schedule that includes activities and times lines for
all parties involved in the commissioning process.
.6
The commissioning plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Consultant and the
University of Manitoba Commissioning Advocate prior to starting and amended as
required.
.7
Chair a pre-construction meeting with the purpose of defining, scheduling, implementing,
and coordinating the commissioning plan.
.8
Discuss implementation of the commissioning plan of various disciplines.
.9
Distribute copies of the schedule, checklists, and equipment tags to be used during the
inspection, verification, and commissioning phases of the project.
.10
Complete Forms and sign off when each Form is satisfactorily completed.
Date revised November 30, 2012

University of Manitoba

ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND

SYSTEMS COMMISSIONING

Section 16995

Req #

Page 2

.2

The Consultant shall:

.1
Verify installed equipment meets design requirements.
.2
Provide input where needed to assist in completing the Commissioning process.
.3
Sign off Forms when satisfactorily completed by Contractor.

.3

The Commissioning Advocate shall:

.1
Maintain oversight of the commissioning process
.2
Provide guidance and technical input where required.
.3
Review submissions for compliance to the contract documents and make
recommendations to ensure completeness of the Commissioning Process.
.4
Perform or arrange for periodic construction reviews by University personnel.
.5
Witness selected commissioning performance testing by the Mechanical Contractor.
.6
Review project closeout documentation including as-constructed drawings, O&M
Manuals, commissioning documentation.
.7
Review project prior to contract closeout and check that deficiencies have been
remedied.
.8
Confirm systems acceptance has been received from the consultant prior to the start of
commissioning process.
.9
Accept or reject tests for cause; each rejected test shall be repeated by the contractor
until satisfactory to the Commissioning Advocate at no additional cost.
.10
Submit information on any deficiencies to the Project Coordinator for inclusion into the
Master Deficiency List.
.11
Complete related forms where University of Manitoba technical evaluation is required.

.4

The Project Coordinator shall:

.1
Ensure that all forms have been signed off by the responsible parties.
.2
Receive all forms and distribute them for completion.
.3
Receive deficiency lists and maintain a Master Deficiency List.
.4
Sign off completed Forms and return to Contractor.

1.3

DESCRIPTION
.1
Commissioning activities to include the following:
.1
Verification that all equipment has been supplied to the project in accordance with the
specification. Every piece of equipment requires the satisfactory completion of an
Equipment Form.
.2
Verification that all equipment has been installed as required by the contract documents
and functions correctly. Each piece of equipment requires the satisfactory completion of
an Installation Form.
.3
The functionality and performance of each piece of equipment and every system shall be
verified as operating in accordance with the contract documents. This portion of the
commissioning process requires that all items undergo trial performance testing, and final
operating adjustments to verify acceptable performance. Each piece of equipment and
every system requires the satisfactory completion of a Performance Form.
.4
All discrepancies are to be noted and a signed letter of acceptance from the Manager of
Engineering Services attached for each item.
.5
Demonstration of satisfactory performance of mechanical, electrical, and control systems
to the Consultant and the University of Manitoba required.
.6
Completion of all commissioning test reports, procedures, verification, acceptance, and
Forms.

1.4

COMMISSIONING SCHEDULE
.1
Provide a detailed schedule for all commissioning phases to the Consultant and Owner within 90
calendar days of contract award. The schedule shall include the equipment, installation, and
performance commissioning.
Date revised November 30, 2012

University of Manitoba
Req #

ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND

SYSTEMS COMMISSIONING

Section 16995
Page 3

.2
.3

.3
.4
.5
.6
.7
.8
.9
.10

The Commissioning Plan shall be specific to the project, identifying all items to be commissioned
along with a schedule for the commissioning.
The Commissioning Plan shall include but is not limited to:
.1
Objectives of Commissioning Plan
.2
A listing of all items to be commissioned indicating trade responsible for required
testing.
.3
Typical commissioning check sheets for each type of equipment.
.4
Commissioning schedule
.5
List of individuals / companies performing each test.
.6
Reports required resulting from testing.
The proposed commissioning schedule shall be submitted to the Project Coordinator who will
distribute it to the Consultant and the Review Team.
The Consultant and Owner will review the submitted information and provide the Project
Coordinator comments on any required changes within 10 working days of submission of the
schedule.
The Project Coordinator shall assemble the returned comments and forward this information to
the Contractor.
The Contractor shall modify the schedule as required by the returned comments.
Ensure that commissioning schedule satisfies overall contract obligations with respect to project
scope and completion timeline.
The Contractor shall submit a final schedule to the Project Coordinator.
The Project Coordinator shall distribute the revised commissioning schedule to all parties.
Any changes required as the project proceeds shall follow this same submittal process.

1.5

EQUIPMENT FORMS
.1
This portion of the work requires the Contractor to verify that the specified equipment has been
supplied to this project.
.2
Commissioning forms shall be prepared for each piece of equipment supplied, installed, and/or
connected on this project. The forms shall include all relevant technical information required to
fully describe the equipment. Compile specified characteristics into individual Equipment Forms
which shall be developed for each piece of equipment.
.3
Complete the prepared Equipment Forms to verify that the specified equipment is present.
.4
Note that all information is to be typed into the individual forms and, with the exception of
signatures, not be hand written.
.5
Equal or Alternate equipment may have been supplied and this information needs to be shown on
the Equipment Forms.
.6
Where supplied equipment is not satisfactory, discuss remediation actions with Consultant and
resolve all deficiencies required to complete all Equipment Forms.
.7
All discrepancies are to be noted and a signed letter of acceptance from the Manager of
Engineering Services attached for each item.
.8
Submit signed Equipment Forms to Project Coordinator complete with a list of any outstanding
equipment issues and plans to rectify the situations.
.9
The Project Coordinator will distribute Contractor-signed Forms to the Consultant and
Commissioning Advocate for review. When accepted, the Consultant will sign off and return
Forms to the Project Coordinator.
.10
Project Coordinator will sign off returned Forms as complete and forward them to the Contractor
for inclusion in the Commissioning Manual.

1.6

INSTALLATION FORMS
.1
This portion of the work requires the Contractor to verify that the accepted equipment has been
installed in accordance with the specification and operates when activated. This is not a
performance check but is limited to verification of correct installation and operation only.
.2
Compile specified installation requirements and operating characteristics into individual
Installation Forms.
Date revised November 30, 2012

University of Manitoba
Req #

ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND

SYSTEMS COMMISSIONING

Section 16995
Page 4

.3
.4
.5
.6
.7
.8
.9
.10
.11
.12
.13

Use the Installation Forms to verify the proper installation.

Note that all information is to be typed into the individual forms and, with the exception of
signatures, be not hand written.
Where equipment has not been installed or is not operating in a satisfactory manner, discuss
remedial actions with Consultant and resolve all deficiencies required to complete all Installation
Forms.
All discrepancies are to be noted and a signed letter of acceptance from the Manager of
Engineering Services attached for each item.
Submit all satisfactory Equipment Forms along with a list of outstanding equipment installation
and Performance issues as well as proposed plans to rectify the problems.
Equipment cannot be put into operation until all installation concerns have been corrected.
The Contractor shall submit signed Installation Forms to Project Coordinator complete with a list
of any outstanding equipment issues and plans to rectify the situations.
The Project Coordinator will distribute Contractor-signed Forms to the Consultant for review.
When accepted, the Consultant will sign off and return Forms to the Project Coordinator.
Project Coordinator will then forward the Installation Forms to the Commissioning Advocate for
review and completion of Forms.
Commissioning Advocate to return signed Forms to the Project Coordinator.
The Project Coordinator shall sign off returned Forms as complete and forward them to the
Contractor for inclusion in the Commissioning Manual.

1.7

PERFORMANCE FORMS
.1
This phase of the commissioning process is to verify the performance of the installed equipment
and systems. The previous phases have verified that the proper equipment has been supplied to
the project, installed correctly, and is operating properly. This portion of the work requires the
testing and verification that all components operate as designed.
.2
Compile specified performance characteristics into individual Performance Forms.
.3
Test all equipment and systems and complete individual Performance Forms to verify the proper
performance of all systems installed on this project.
.4
Note that all information is to be typed into the individual forms and, with the exception of
signatures, not be hand written.
.5
Document performance of all dynamic systems and verify balancing report information noting
relevant system pressures and electrical characteristics of motors.
.6
Where performance characteristics are not satisfactory, repair all deficiencies required to
complete all Forms. Where equipment is not performing in a satisfactory manner, discuss
remedial actions with Consultant and resolve all deficiencies required to complete all Forms.
.7
All discrepancies are to be noted and a signed letter of acceptance from the Manager of
Engineering Services attached for each item.
.8
The commissioning process will not be accepted as complete until Performance Forms have
been satisfactorily completed for all equipment and systems.
.9
The Contractor shall submit signed Performance Forms to the Project Coordinator complete with
a list of any outstanding equipment issues and plans to rectify the situations.
.10
The Project Coordinator will distribute Contractor-signed Forms to the Consultant for review.
When accepted, the Consultant will sign off and return Forms to the Project Coordinator.
.11
Project Coordinator will then forward the Performance Forms to the Commissioning Advocate for
review and completion of Forms.
.12
Commissioning Advocate to return signed Forms to the Project Coordinator.
.13
The Project Coordinator shall sign off returned Forms as complete and forward them to the
Contractor for inclusion in the Commissioning Manual.

1.8

FINAL ADJUSTMENT
.1
Re-test any equipment or systems which did not meet the design performance or intent. If
necessary, the Consultant will issue corrective measures if an acceptable performance level
cannot be achieved. Re-testing will continue until acceptable performance is achieved.
.2
Document the system or equipment settings which meet the design intent.
Date revised November 30, 2012

University of Manitoba

ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND

SYSTEMS COMMISSIONING

Req #

Section 16995
Page 5

1.9

SEASONAL (DEFERRED) COMMISSIONING

.1
At the completion of construction, the Contractor will create a schedule for deferred
commissioning items.
.2
The schedule will identify performance testing which could not be undertaken due to the season,
lack of occupancy, or for any other reason.
.3
Submit report for seasonal commissioning, findings, and/or additional recommendations to the
Consultant and the University.
.4
The Project Coordinator will schedule seasonal commissioning with the building operating
personnel, the Contractor, the Consultant, and the Commissioning Advocate.

1.10

DOCUMENTATION
.1
Once the commissioning process is complete, provide three (3) set of commissioning manuals in
separate 3 D ring, loose leaf binders with spine and face pockets, with the project name clearly
indicated on the spline and face.
.2
The Commissioning Manuals shall be labelled as Tab 9 of the Operating and Maintenance Manuals.
Refer to 16050 for further information on O&M Manuals.
.3
In addition to all information providing in manuals, also provide a complete copy of all commissioning
information and Forms in MS Word format on CD.
.4
The final accepted copy of the commissioning program shall be provided to the Project Coordinator
and a signed receipt taken for delivery.

1.1

REVIEW TEAMS
.5
The University of Manitoba has assigned a dedicated Review Team to this project to review and
assist in the design, construction, and commissioning processes.
.6
The list of Review Team members is shown on the following page.

END OF SECTION 16995

Date revised November 30, 2012

University of Manitoba

ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND

SYSTEMS COMMISSIONING

Section 16995

Req #

Page 6

Project Review Team #1

Discipline
Air Filtration
Architecture/Facilitator
Building Envelope
Card Access/Keying
Caretaking/Flooring
Carpentry
Controls
Documentation
Elevators
Electrical
Energy Issues
Fire Alarms
Fire Dampers
Fire Extinguishers
Fire Safety & CPS
Grounds Maintenance/Garbage Pickup
Interior Design
Data
Voice
Audio Visual
Landscaping
Locksmith/Hardware
Mechanical HVAC
Millwork
Painting
Pipe Insulation
Plumbing
Powerhouse Engineers
Pump Maintenance
Refrigeration
Roofing
Signage/Wayfinding
Sprinkler System
Sustainability
Universal Access
Welding
Water Treatment

Team 1
Chris Horne
Dennis Kohut
Bill Schellenberg
Barb Blackner
Jasmin Ismailovic
Leo Gosselin
George Andrews
Ken Berman
Bruce Lowry
Bruce Hancock
Mike Ferley
Ed Matias
Paul Sutherland
Bob Mandziuk
Safety Office
Michele Rogalsky
Karen Brown
John Dunning
Judy Puhach
Irene Thain
Michele Rogalsky
Ray Prevost
Brian Hughes
Roger Lamontagne
Karen Brown
Tom Mirwaldt
Tom Mirwaldt
Bruce Alexander
Chris Horne
George Hall
Ken Berman and D K Bennett

Dennis Kohut
Ed Matias
Maire McDermott
Dennis Kohut/David Rapson

Tom Mirwaldt
Mark Rozmus

Date revised November 30, 2012

University of Manitoba
Req #

ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND

SYSTEMS COMMISSIONING

Section 16995
Page 7

Date revised November 30, 2012

University of Manitoba

ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND

SYSTEMS COMMISSIONING

Section 16995

Req #

Page 8

Project Review Team #2

Discipline
Air Filtration
Architecture/Facilitator
Building Envelope
Card Access/Keying
Caretaking/Flooring
Carpentry
Controls
Documentation
Elevators
Electrical
Energy Issues
Fire Alarms
Fire Dampers
Fire Extinguishers
Fire Safety & CPS
Grounds Maintenance/Garbage Pickup
Interior Design
Data
Voice
Audio Visual
Landscaping
Locksmith/Hardware
Mechanical HVAC
Millwork
Painting
Pipe Insulation
Plumbing
Powerhouse
Pump Maintenance
Refrigeration
Roofing
Signage/Wayfinding
Sprinkler System
Sustainability
Universal Access
Welding
Water Treatment

Team 2
Ron Holland
Paul Schaeffer
Bill Schellenberg
Barb Blackner
Al Mierke
Leo Gosselin
George Andrews
Mike Pratt
Bruce Lowry
Bruce Hancock
Mike Ferley
Ed Matias
Paul Sutherland
Bob Mandziuk
Safety Office
Michele Rogalsky
Karen Brown
John Dunning
Judy Puhach
Irene Thain
Lyle Morin
Ray Prevost
Greg Massey
Leo Gosselin
Karen Brown
Ray Aubin
Tom Mirwaldt
Greg Kowk
Jim Benzie
Dan Brandson
Ken Berman & D K Bennett
Dennis Kohut
Ed Matias
Maire McDermott
Paul Schaeffer/David Rapson
Ray Aubin
Mark Rozmus

Date revised November 30, 2012

University of Manitoba
Req #

ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND

SYSTEMS COMMISSIONING

Section 16995
Page 9

Date revised November 30, 2012

University of Manitoba

ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND

SYSTEMS COMMISSIONING

Section 16995

Req #

Page 10

Project Review Team #3

Discipline
Air Filtration
Architecture/Facilitator
Building Envelope
Card Access/Keying
Caretaking/Flooring
Carpentry
Controls
Documentation
Elevators
Electrical
Energy Issues
Fire Alarms
Fire Dampers
Fire Extinguishers
Fire Safety & CPS
Grounds Maintenance/Garbage Pickup
Interior Design
Data
Voice
Audio Visual
Landscaping
Locksmith/Hardware
Mechanical HVAC
Millwork
Painting
Pipe Insulation
Plumbing
Powerhouse Engineers
Pump Maintenance
Refrigeration
Roofing
Signage/Wayfinding
Sprinkler System
Sustainability
Universal Access
Welding
Water Treatment

Team 3
Ralph Newell
Bob Ramsay
Bill Schellenberg
Barb Blackner
Jasmin Ismailovic
Roger LaMontange
George Andrews
Ben Paul
Bruce Lowry
Bruce Hancock
Mike Ferley
Brian Bennett
Paul Sutherland
Bob Mandziuk
Safety Office
Michele Rogalsky
Karen Brown
John Dunning
Judy Puhach
Irene Thain
Dennis Kohut
Ray Prevost
Paul Sutherland
Tony Rizzuto
Karen Brown
Ray Aubin
Tom Mirwaldt
Dale Stiles
Jim Carewick
Ken Francey
Ken Berman & D K Bennett

Dennis Kohut
Ed Matias
Maire McDermott
Bob Ramsay/David Rapson

Ray Aubin
Mark Rozmus

Date revised November 30, 2012

University of Manitoba
Req #

ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND

SYSTEMS COMMISSIONING

Section 16995
Page 11

Date revised November 30, 2012

University of Manitoba

ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND

SYSTEMS COMMISSIONING

Section 16995

Req #

Page 12

Bannatyne Project Review Team

Discipline
Air Filtration
Architecture
Architectural/Planning
Architectural/Planning
Building Envelope
Card Access/Keying
Caretaking/Flooring
Carpentry
Controls
Documentation/Facilitator
Elevators
Electrical
Energy Issues
Fire Alarms
Fire Dampers
Fire Extinguishers
Fire Safety & CPS
Interior Design
Data
Voice
Audio Visual
Landscaping
Locksmith/Hardware
Mechanical HVAC
Millwork
Painting
Pipe Insulation
Plumbing
Powerhouse Engineers
Pump Maintenance
Refrigeration
Roofing
Signage/Wayfinding
Sprinkler System
Sustainability
Universal Access
Welding
Water Treatment

Bannatyne Team
Gerry Rossong
Allan Griffiths
Rejeanne Dupuis
Rob Froese
Allan Griffiths
Barb Blackner
Ben Domaradzki
Don Cianflone
Dave Johannason
Mike Starkey
Bruce Lowry
Len Zeleninsky
Mike Ferley
Ron Jackson
Paul Sutherland
Bob Mandziuk
Safety Office
Karen Brown
Gabrielle Bartsch-Smith
Judy Puhach
Gabrielle Bartsch-Smith
Ben Domaradzki
Ray Prevost
Mike Starkey
Lindsay Chung
Frank Wright
Tom Mirwaldt
Bob Milne
Ron Thomson
Mike Starkey
Jeff Modjeski
Mike Starkey
Dennis Kohut
Ed Matias
Maire McDermott
Allan Griffiths
Tom Mirwaldt
Gerry Rossong

Date revised November 30, 2012

University of Manitoba

ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND

SYSTEMS COMMISSIONING

Req #

Section 16995
Page 13

END OF SECTION 15995

Date revised November 30, 2012

University of Manitoba.

COMMISSIONING PLAN
EQUIPMENT FORM
PART 1 OF 3

Req #

Section 16995
Page 14

TRANSFORMER
Date:
Transformer Number:
Location:
Transformer Data

Specified

Shop Drawings

Manufacture
Model Number
KVA Size
Voltage Primary
Voltage Secondary
Phase
Neutral Primary Yes___No___
Neutral Primary Yes___No___
Impedance

U OF M PERSON REVIEWING SHOP DRAWING

Comments:

Contractor

Signed

Date

Consultant
Commissioning
Advocate

Signed

Date

Signed

Date

Project Coordinator

Signed

Date

Installed/OnSite/Ordered

TRANSFORMER
Date:
Transformer Number:
Location:
Manufacture:

Model Number:

Primary Voltage:

KVA Size:

Secondary Voltage:

Phase:

Neutral Yes____ No____

SPEC REFERENCE
YES

NO

N/A

YES

Pad Mounted

Unit Cleaned

Wall Mounted

Wiring Complete

Identification tags match spec.

Test sheets attached

Mfgrs test sheets complete

Comments:

NO

N/A

University of Manitoba.

COMMISSIONING PLAN
PERFORMANCE FORM
PART 3 OF 3

Req #

Section 16995
Page 16

TRANSFORMER
Date:
Transformer Number:
Location:
Manufacture:

Model Number:

Primary Voltage:

KVA Size:

Secondary Voltage:

Phase:

Fed From:

Neutral Yes____ No____

Feeder Breaker Size:

Test sheets provided as per spec section 16460

Feeder Size:
Feeder Ampacity:
Test Operation of Temperature & All Associated Alarms: Yes ___ No___ Remarks
Megger Tests:

Design:

Measured:

Remarks:

Design:

Measured:

Remarks:

Design:

Measured:

Remarks:

A-B
A-C
B-C
A-G
B-G
C-G
Primary Voltage:
A-B
A-C
B-C
Secondary Voltage:
A-B
A-C
B-C

Contractor

Signed

Date

Consultant
Commissioning
Advocate

Signed

Date

Signed

Date

Project Coordinator

Signed

Date

University of Manitoba.

COMMISSIONING PLAN
EQUIPMENT FORM
PART 1 OF 3

Req #

Section 16995
Page 17

MAIN DISTRIBUTION PANEL

Date:
Panel Name:
Location:
Panel Data

Specified

Shop Drawings

Manufacture:
Model Number:
Main Breaker Size:
Voltage:
Phase:
Neutral: Yes___No___
Isolated Ground: Yes___No___

U OF M PERSON REVIEWING SHOP DRAWING

Comments:

Contractor

Signed

Date

Consultant

Signed

Date

Commissioning Adv

Signed

Date

Project Coordinator

Signed

Date

Installed/OnSite/Ordered

MAIN DISTRIBUTION PANEL

Date:
Panel Name:
Location:
Manufacture:

Model Number:

Main Breaker Size:

Voltage:

Neutral Yes____ No____

Phase:

Neutral Size:
Isolated Ground: Yes____ No____
SPEC REFERENCE
YES

NO

N/A

YES

Mounted on Wall

Wiring Complete

Main Breaker Installed

Test sheets attached

Lamacoids Installed

Panel Cover Installed

Panel Nameplate match spec.

Mfgrs test sheets complete

Comments:

NO

N/A

University of Manitoba.

COMMISSIONING PLAN
PERFORMANCE FORM
PART 3 OF 3

Req #

Section 16995
Page 19

MAIN DISTRIBUTION PANEL

Date:
Panel Name:
Location:
Manufacture:

Model Number:

Voltage:

Neutral Yes____ No____

Phase:

Neutral Size:

Main Breaker:

Isolated Ground Yes____ No____

Fed From:

Panel Cleaned Yes____ No____

Feeder Breaker Size:

Feeder Size:
Feeder Ampacity:
Lamacoid Identification:
Panel Directory:
Megger Tests:

Design:

Measured:

Remarks:

Design:

Measured:

Remarks:

A-B
A-C
B-C
A-G
B-G
C-G
Voltage:
A-B
A-C
B-C
A-N
A-N
B-N

Contractor

Signed

Date

Consultant

Signed

Date

Commissioning Adv

Signed

Date

Project Coordinator

Signed

Date

University of Manitoba.

COMMISSIONING PLAN
EQUIPMENT FORM
PART 1 OF 3

Req #

Section 16995
Page 20

CDP PANEL
Date:
Panel Name:
Location:
Panel Data

Specified

Shop Drawings

Manufacture:
Model Number:
Voltage:
Phase:
Neutral: Yes___No___
Isolated Ground: Yes___No___

U OF M PERSON REVIEWING SHOP DRAWING

Comments:

Contractor

Signed

Date

Consultant

Signed

Date

Commissioning Adv

Signed

Date

Project Coordinator

Signed

Date

Installed/OnSite/Ordered

CDP PANEL
Date:
Panel Name:
Location:
Manufacture:

Model Number:

Voltage:

Phase:

Neutral Yes____ No____

Isolated Ground: Yes____ No____

Neutral Size:

SPEC REFERENCE
YES

NO

N/A

YES

Mounted on Wall

Wiring Complete

Breakers Installed

Test sheets attached

Lamacoid Installed

Panel Cover Installed

Panel Nameplate match spec.

Mfgrs test sheets complete

Comments:

NO

N/A

University of Manitoba.
Req #

COMMISSIONING PLAN
PERFORMANCE FORM
PART 3 OF 3

Section 16995
Page 22

CDP PANEL
Date:
Panel Name:
Location:
Manufacture:

Model Number:

Voltage:

Neutral Yes____ No____

Phase:

Neutral Size:

Fed From:

Isolated Ground Yes____ No____

Feeder Breaker Size:

Panel Cleaned Yes____ No____

Feeder Size:
Feeder Ampacity:
Lamacoid Identification:
Panel Directory:
Megger Tests:

Design:

Measured:

Remarks:

Design:

Measured:

Remarks:

A-B
A-C
B-C
A-G
B-G
C-G
Voltage:
A-B
A-C
B-C
A-N
A-N
B-N

University of Manitoba.

COMMISSIONING PLAN
EQUIPMENT FORM
PART 1 OF 3

Req #

Section 16995
Page 23

PANEL
Date:
Panel Name:
Location:
Panel Data

Specified

Shop Drawings

Manufacture:
Model Number:
Voltage:
Phase:
Neutral: Yes___No___
Isolated Ground: Yes___No___

U OF M PERSON REVIEWING SHOP DRAWING

Comments:

Contractor

Signed

Date

Consultant

Signed

Date

Commissioning Adv

Signed

Date

Project Coordinator

Signed

Date

Installed/OnSite/Ordered

University of Manitoba.

COMMISSIONING PLAN
INSTALLATION FORM
PART 2 OF 3

Req #

Section 16995
Page 24

PANEL
Date:
Panel Name:
Location:
Manufacture:

Model Number:

Voltage:

Phase:

Neutral Yes____ No____

Isolated Ground: Yes____ No____

Neutral Size:

YES

NO

N/A

YES

Mounted on Wall

Wiring Complete

Breakers Installed

Test sheets attached

Lamacoid Installed

Panel Cover Installed

Panel Nameplate match spec.

Mfgrs test sheets complete

Comments:

Contractor

Signed

Date

Consultant

Signed

Date

Commissioning Adv

Signed

Date

Project Coordinator

Signed

Date

NO

N/A

University of Manitoba.

COMMISSIONING PLAN
PERFORMANCE FORM
PART 3 OF 3

Req #

Section 16995
Page 25

PANEL
Date:
Panel Name:
Location:
Manufacture:

Model Number:

Voltage:

Neutral Yes____ No____

Phase:

Neutral Size:

Fed From:

Isolated Ground Yes____ No____

Feeder Breaker Size:

Panel Cleaned Yes____ No____

Feeder Size:
Feeder Ampacity:
Lamacoid Identification:
Panel Directory:

Megger Tests:

Design:

Measured:

Remarks:

Design:

Measured:

Remarks:

A-B
A-C
B-C
A-G
B-G
C-G
Voltage:
A-B
A-C
B-C
A-N
A-N
B-N

Contractor

Signed

Date

Consultant

Signed

Date

Commissioning Adv

Signed

Date

Project Coordinator

Signed

Date

University of Manitoba.

COMMISSIONING PLAN
EQUIPMENT FORM
PART 1 OF 3

Req #

Section 16995
Page 26

MOTOR CONTROL CENTRE

Date:
MCC Number:
Location:
Panel Data

Specified

Shop Drawings

Manufacture:
Model Number:
Voltage:
Phase:
Neutral: Yes___No___

U OF M PERSON REVIEWING SHOP DRAWING

Comments:

Contractor

Signed

Date

Consultant

Signed

Date

Commissioning Adv

Signed

Date

Project Coordinator

Signed

Date

Installed/OnSite/Ordered

University of Manitoba.

COMMISSIONING PLAN
EQUIPMENT FORM
PART 1 OF 3

Req #

Section 16995
Page 27

MOTOR CONTROL CENTRE

Date:
MCC Number:
Location:
Manufacture:

Model Number:

Voltage:

Phase:

Neutral Yes____ No____

Neutral Size:

SPEC REFERENCE
YES

NO

N/A

YES

Mounted on Wall

Wiring Complete

Pad Mounted

Test sheets attached

Lamacoid Installed

Panel Cover Installed

Panel Nameplate match spec.

Starters Installed

Mfgrs test sheets complete

Comments:

Contractor

Signed

Date

Consultant

Signed

Date

Commissioning Adv

Signed

Date

Project Coordinator

Signed

Date

NO

N/A

University of Manitoba.

COMMISSIONING PLAN
PERFORMANCE FORM
PART 3 OF 3

Req #

Section 16995
Page 28

MOTOR CONTROL CENTRE

Date:
MCC Number:
Location:
Manufacture:

Model Number:

Voltage:

Neutral Yes____ No____

Phase:

Neutral Size:

Fed From:

MCC Cleaned Yes____ No____

Feeder Breaker Size:

Feeder Size:
Feeder Ampacity:
Lamacoid Identification:
Panel Directory:

Megger Tests:

Design:

Measured:

Remarks:

Design:

Measured:

Remarks:

A-B
A-C
B-C
A-G
B-G
C-G
Voltage:
A-B
A-C
B-C
A-N
A-N
B-N

Contractor

Signed

Date

Consultant

Signed

Date

Commissioning Adv

Signed

Date

Project Coordinator

Signed

Date

University of Manitoba.

COMMISSIONING PLAN
EQUIPMENT FORM
PART 1 OF 3

Req #

Section 16995
Page 29

EMERGENCY BATTERY BANK & REMOTE LIGHT HEAD

Date:
Emergency Battery Bank Number:
Location:
EBB Data

Specified

Shop Drawings

Installed/OnSite/Ordered

Specified

Shop Drawings

Installed/OnSite/Ordered

Manufacture:
Model Number:
AC Voltage:
DC Voltage:
Capacity Size:
Lamp Heads: Yes___No___
Disconnect Device

Light Head Data

Manufacture:
Model Number:
DC Voltage:
Lamp Wattage:
Color:

U OF M PERSON REVIEWING SHOP DRAWING

Comments:

Contractor

Signed

Date

Consultant

Signed

Date

Commissioning Adv

Signed

Date

Project Coordinator

Signed

Date

EMERGENCY BATTERY BANK & REMOTE LIGHT HEAD

Date:
Emergency Battery Bank Number:
Location:
Manufacture:

Model Number:

AC Voltage:

DC Voltage:

Capacity Size:

Lamp Heads: Yes____ No____

Remote Light Head:

Manufacture:

Model Number:

Lamp Wattage:

DC Voltage:

Color:

YES

NO

N/A

YES

Wall Mounted

Wiring Complete

Shelf Mounted

Test sheets attached

Disconnect Device Installed

Lamacoid Installed

Panel Nameplate match spec.

Mfgrs test sheets complete

Comments:

NO

N/A

University of Manitoba.

COMMISSIONING PLAN
PERFORMANCE FORM
PART 3 OF 3

Req #

Section 16995
Page 31

EMERGENCY BATTERY BANK & REMOTE LIGHT HEAD

Date:
Emergency Battery Bank:
Location:
Manufacture:
Model Number:
AC Voltage:
DC Voltage:
Capacity Size:
Lamp Heads Yes____ No____
Lamp Head Manufacture:
Lamp Head Model Number:
Lamp Head Wattage:
Fed From:
Disconnect Device: Cord and Plug____ Key Switch____

Remote Light Head:

Manufacture:
Model Number:
DC Voltage:
Lamp Wattage:
Color:
All Heads Aimed Appropriately:

Yes_____ No_____

Comments:

Contractor

Signed

Date

Consultant

Signed

Date

Commissioning Adv

Signed

Date

Project Coordinator

Signed

Date

University of Manitoba.

COMMISSIONING PLAN
EQUIPMENT FORM
PART 1 OF 3

Req #

Section 16995
Page 32

LIGHT FIXTURE
Date:
Light Fixture Number:
Light Data

Specified

Shop Drawings

Installed/OnSite/Ordered

Specified

Shop Drawings

Installed/OnSite/Ordered

Manufacture:
Model Number:
Voltage:
Lamp:
Color:

Lamp Data
Manufacture:
Model Number:
Voltage:
Wattage:
Color:

U OF M PERSON REVIEWING SHOP DRAWING

Comments:

Contractor

Signed

Date

Consultant

Signed

Date

Commissioning Adv

Signed

Date

Project Coordinator

Signed

Date

University of Manitoba.

COMMISSIONING PLAN
INSTALLATION FORM
PART 2 OF 3

Req #

Section 16995
Page 33

LIGHT FIXTURE
Date:
Light Fixture Number:
Manufacture:

Model Number:

Voltage:

Lamp:

Color:

Lamp:
Manufacture:

Model Number:

Wattage:

Voltage:

YES

NO

N/A

YES

Wall Mounted

Wiring Complete

Ceiling Mounted

Test sheets attached

Suspended Down
Nameplate match spec.
Mfgrs test sheets complete

Comments:

NO

N/A

University of Manitoba.

COMMISSIONING PLAN
PERFORMANCE FORM
PART 3 OF 3

Req #

Section 16995
Page 34

LIGHT FIXTURE
Date:
Light Fixture Number:
Manufacture:
Model Number:
Voltage:
Color:
Lamp Wattage:
Mounting:
Cleaned: Yes_____ No_____

Lamp:
Manufacture:
Model Number:
Voltage:
Wattage:

Comments:

Consultant

Signed

Date

Contractor

Signed

Date

Commissioning Adv

Signed

Date

Project Coordinator

Signed

Date