This documentary examines the controversial 1997 trial of Paco Larrañaga in the Philippines, who was sentenced to death for the rape and murder of two sisters despite overwhelming evidence of his innocence. The film follows Larrañaga's case for over a decade as he attempts to overturn his conviction amid a corrupt justice system plagued by coerced confessions, political favors, and media sensationalism. Though the case helped end capital punishment in the Philippines, it failed to free Larrañaga and exposes deeper issues of injustice, highlighting the human impact when a system meant to deliver justice does the opposite.
This documentary examines the controversial 1997 trial of Paco Larrañaga in the Philippines, who was sentenced to death for the rape and murder of two sisters despite overwhelming evidence of his innocence. The film follows Larrañaga's case for over a decade as he attempts to overturn his conviction amid a corrupt justice system plagued by coerced confessions, political favors, and media sensationalism. Though the case helped end capital punishment in the Philippines, it failed to free Larrañaga and exposes deeper issues of injustice, highlighting the human impact when a system meant to deliver justice does the opposite.
This documentary examines the controversial 1997 trial of Paco Larrañaga in the Philippines, who was sentenced to death for the rape and murder of two sisters despite overwhelming evidence of his innocence. The film follows Larrañaga's case for over a decade as he attempts to overturn his conviction amid a corrupt justice system plagued by coerced confessions, political favors, and media sensationalism. Though the case helped end capital punishment in the Philippines, it failed to free Larrañaga and exposes deeper issues of injustice, highlighting the human impact when a system meant to deliver justice does the opposite.
This documentary examines the controversial 1997 trial of Paco Larrañaga in the Philippines, who was sentenced to death for the rape and murder of two sisters despite overwhelming evidence of his innocence. The film follows Larrañaga's case for over a decade as he attempts to overturn his conviction amid a corrupt justice system plagued by coerced confessions, political favors, and media sensationalism. Though the case helped end capital punishment in the Philippines, it failed to free Larrañaga and exposes deeper issues of injustice, highlighting the human impact when a system meant to deliver justice does the opposite.
Community Engagement & Education DISCUSSION GUIDE www.pbs.org/pov POV | 2 DISCUSSION GUIDE Give Up Tomorrow LETTERS FROM THE FILMMAKERS DIRECTORS STATEMENT Producer Marty Syjuco and I had been friends for a few years when his older brother, Paco Larraagas brother-in-law, asked for our help. I had heard that Paco was accused of murdering two women on the island of Cebu in the Philippines, but everyone in the family was embarrassed to talk about it and was 100 percent sure that the Supreme Court would overturn his death sentence. I retained some skepticismuntil I read the letter from the 35 unheard witnesses in the case. I was in a caf on New York Citys Lower East Side, and the letter brought me to tears. Paco was my age, and over the previous seven years, while I had thrived, he had waited, unjustly condemned to execution, in a horrific gang-run prison. There was no way to ignore the injustice; I had a background in video and had long believed in films ability to create social change. But it was only when I realized how passionate I had become about this story that I felt the full power of the medium. Passion alone does not make good cinema, though, and it has taken seven years to complete this project. Our first step was to go to Los Angeles to interview two of the letter writers who attested to Pacos whereabouts when the crime was committed in 1997. They had left the Philippines, partially out of disgust over this case, but also because they felt haunted by guiltthe same guilt we would feel if we were unable to reverse a clear and terrible injustice. At our first meeting in Los Angeles, the two broke down and wept over their powerlessness and failure to make anyone listen. They painted a picture of cronyism, corruption and class and race conflict in the Philippines that made us realize this injustice was only the tip of a very deep iceberg. In the Philippines, a few people, galvanized by the opportunity to do the right thing, supported us with housing, resources, information and encouragement. Others held back, believing that the system was beyond reform and the risk in going against police, presidents and drug lords was too high. Paco, who soon will have spent half his life in prison, was reticent for other reasons: When we discussed the case and prison, he became cold and somber. But when we talked about his pre-trial life, he was full of warmth and enthusiasm. I regret thatbecause of the prison environment and Pacos experience of media as enemywe could not adequately capture on film the sweetness and joy in his personality that we glimpsed, and that Pacos friends and family saw as his essential nature. I came to understand that we could prove Pacos innocence over and over with the facts, but that would never be enough. We needed not only to expose a deep and complex dynamic of corruption and injustice, but also to reveal the part of the culture of the Philippines that is human, decent and suffering. Michael Collins Director, Give Up Tomorrow Director Michael Collins Photo courtesy of Joshua Z. Weinstein LETTERS FROM THE FILMMAKERS | 3 DISCUSSION GUIDE Give Up Tomorrow PRODUCERS STATEMENT I first met Paco at my brothers wedding to Mimi, Pacos older sister. Eight years younger than I, he was just an overweight kid, and I didnt pay him much attention. Later, when I heard about his arrest and trial, I went on with my life. Part of me figured the courts would sort it out. Another part was so inured to the injustice and corruption that form the background noise of the Philippines, that I, like most Filipinos, was hobbled by fatalism. After moving to New York and working in film distribution, I began to crave something more meaningful and creative. When Pacos sentence was elevated to death, and I saw the letter from the 35 unheard witnesses, I knew I was at a crossroads. My own mother had seen Paco in Manila300 miles from the scene of the crimeon the day of the murders and had been denied the right to testify in court and corroborate his alibi. I know some will question my objectivity and intent because Paco is my brother-in-law, but that relationship gave me inside access and perspective. It also opened my eyes to a part of the Philippines that, as one of its beneficiaries, I had ignored. My family members are mestizos, a group that traditionally benefits from endemic corruption and cronyism. Educated in Canada and the United States, I had lived in a gated community in the Philippines, and I had been naively and willfully ignorant of the poverty all around meblind even to the thousands of street children who haunt our cities. My clan was well protected by race, political connections and wealth from the worst aspects of our countrys deeply flawed system. It was precisely my comfort in this role, and my perspectives as a political and familial insider, that made me particularly suitedand obligatedto act in Pacos case. I had left the Philippines, but it lived inside me. And I knew I had to return. I love the country and have friends and family there, but I have grown to abhor the fatalism that allows people to turn away from injustice, and that helps the elite control the poor and uneducated. But even for the elite, the countrys poorly paid and ill-trained police are a persistent threatto be bribed as a first resort, and from which to escape if that fails. Under political pressure to solve crimes, they commonly charge any vaguely likely suspect. I strongly believe that most of the Philippines prisoners have been denied due process or are innocentor both, as we found in Pacos caseand that injustice is facilitated by the media. Once I had believed what I read and saw, but first- hand knowledge made me question so many of my birthright preconceptions and opened not only a sea of skepticism, but an ocean of hope. Paco Larraaga is just one among many. And the Philippines is not alone in failing to build the trappings of democracy, including elections, on a solid foundation of impartial institutions, such as independent courts. There are thousands of Pacos around the world, from Egypt to the United States. We are hoping that this film will make not only Filipinos, but people of all nationalities, sit up, pay attention and act. Marty Syjuco Producer, Give Up Tomorrow Producer Marty Syjuco Photo courtesy of Joshua Z. Weinstein | 4 DISCUSSION GUIDE Give Up Tomorrow 2 Letters From the Filmmakers 5 Introduction 6 Potential Partners 6 Key Issues 6 Using This Guide 7 Background Information 7 Paco Larraaga Case Summary 11 Philippines Country Profile 13 Cases of Wrongful Conviction 15 Prisoner Transfer Treaties 17 Media Responsibility in the Philippines 19 Selected People Featured in Give Up Tomorrow 22 General Discussion Questions 23 Discussion Prompts 30 Taking Action 31 Resources 33 How to Buy the Film Writer Faith Rogow, PhD Insighters Educational Consulting Guide Producers and Background Research, POV Eliza Licht Vice President, Community Engagement & Education, POV Jamie Dobie Coordinator, Community Engagement & Education, POV Aubrey Gallegos Assistant, Community Engagement & Education, POV Abby Harri Marlaina Martin Samantha Rivera Nicole Tsien Interns, Community Engagement & Education, POV Design: Rafael Jimnez Eyeball Copy Editor: Natalie Danford Thanks to those who reviewed this guide: Michael Collins and Marty Syjuco Filmmakers, Give Up Tomorrow TABLE OF CONTENTS CREDITS This could be a fictional thrillera who- done-it with an intriguing cast of characters. But it is very real. In 1997, as a tropical storm beat down on an island in the Philippines, the Chiong sisters left work and never made it home. Paco Larraaga, a 19-year-old student, was arrested, tried and sentenced to death for their rape and murder, despite overwhelming evidence of his innocence. Give Up Tomorrow documents Larraagas controversial trialone of the most sensational ever in the Philippines. The films examination of the proceedings strips the veneer of raw emotions to reveal shocking corruption. For more than a decade, two grieving mothers find themselves entangled in a case that ends a nations use of capital punishment but fails to free an innocent man. The filmmakers draw the audience into a straightforward, yet complex, journey that examines prison conditions, coerced confessions, hints of political favors, media sensationalism and the boundaries of international law. Uncomfortably, viewers are left to ponder the impact on individuals, families, communities and a nation when a system that is supposed to deliver justice does the opposite. INTRODUCTION | 5 DISCUSSION GUIDE Give Up Tomorrow Paco Larraaga Photo courtesy of Thoughtful Robot Give Up Tomorrow is well suited for use in a variety of settings and is especially recommended for use with: Your local PBS station Groups that have discussed previous PBS and POV films relating to criminal justice systems, unjust imprisonment or the death penalty, including Presumed Guilty, Prison Town, USA and Better This World. Groups focused on any of the issues listed in the Key Issues section High school students Faith-based organizations and institutions Cultural, art and historical organizations, institutions and museums Civic, fraternal and community groups Academic departments and student groups at colleges, universities and high schools Community organizations with a mission to promote education and learning, such as your local library Give Up Tomorrow is an excellent tool for outreach and will be of special interest to people looking to explore the following topics: Citizenship Corruption Crime/criminal justice Death penalty Fair trials Human rights International law Journalism Justice Justice system Law Media literacy Philippines Prison/incarceration Spain Wrongful convictions | 6 DISCUSSION GUIDE Give Up Tomorrow USING THIS GUIDE This guide is an invitation to dialogue. It is based on a belief in the power of human connection, designed for people who want to use Give Up Tomorrow to engage family, friends, classmates, colleagues and communities. In contrast to initiatives that foster debates in which participants try to convince others that they are right, this document envisions conversations undertaken in a spirit of openness in which people try to understand one another and expand their thinking by sharing viewpoints and listening actively. The discussion prompts are intentionally crafted to help a wide range of audiences think more deeply about the issues in the film. Rather than attempting to address them all, choose one or two that best meet your needs and interests. And be sure to leave time to consider taking action. Planning next steps can help people leave the room feeling energized and optimistic, even in instances when conversations have been difficult. For more detailed event planning and facilitation tips, visit www.pbs.org/pov/outreach POTENTIAL PARTNERS KEY ISSUES BACKGROUND INFORMATION | 7 DISCUSSION GUIDE Give Up Tomorrow Paco Larraaga Case Summary July 16, 1997 was a typical day for Give Up Tomorrows subject, Paco Larraaga. He attended culinary classes and then enjoyed the nightlife in Manila with his classmates. The next morning he was back at school for a day of exams. Three hundred miles away on the island of Cebu, parents Dionisio and Thelma Chiong were filing missing-persons reports. Their daughters, Marijoy, 21, and Jacqueline, 23, had disappeared while waiting for their father to give them a ride home from work. The sisters would never be seen alive again. A battered, blindfolded and handcuffed body was soon discovered and identified as Marijoy. Jacqueline was never found. Two months later, Pacos sister, Mimi, received a call from her frightened brother saying that men in civilian clothes were arresting him for the kidnap, rape and murder of both Chiong sisters. Six other boys in Cebu were also arrested. Although some of the boys names were on a list of juvenile delinquents because of a previous altercation, there was no evidence linking them to the crime. The Chiong family is Chinese-Filipino. Paco is part of a prominent mestizo political clan that includes a former president. Beefy and tough, with a past of petty offenses, he neatly fits the role of privileged thugand that is how he was cast by the frenzied media that swarmed his arrest and trial and cheered his eventual sentence to death by lethal injection. Paco Larraaga (right) behind bars, being interviewed by a news reporter, shortly after he was arrested for the kidnap, rape and murder of two sisters in the Philippines. Photo courtesy of Arni Aclao BACKGROUND INFORMATION | 8 DISCUSSION GUIDE Give Up Tomorrow Initially, Pacos family, devout Catholics like many Filipinos, discussed his leaving the country. But they decided he would stay and clear his name. We didnt think it would go beyond preliminary investigation because we had . . . more than 35 witnesses . . . that said this boy was nowhere near Cebu on July 16, said Mimi. As the media began painting sensational portraits of the accused boys as drug addicts, Thelma Chiong, distraught mother of the victims, became a sensation herself. She claimed Paco had been dating and menacing Marijoy, an allegation he and his sister, Mimi, strenuously denied. Mimi began to suspect that the Chiongs were hiding something. She was right. It turned out that Dionisio Chiong had worked at a trucking company owned by an alleged drug lord. At the time of his daughters disappearance, Dionisio had been scheduled to testify against the drug lord at a congressional hearing, but then he abruptly changed his mind. Could the murders have been ordered to ensure Dionisios silence? It was later discovered that the plainclothes police who arrested Paco were the alleged drug kingpins bodyguards and that the police superin- tendent was a close friend. The story became stranger still. While Paco and the six co- defendants languished in prison, Thelma Chiong was appointed vice president of the Crusade Against Violence. Her sister was the personal secretary to the newly elected president, Joseph Estrada, who assigned four different agencies to tackle the investigation. Police searched the Larraagas property for a link to the crime. No such link was found, but eight months later prosecutors announced they had a star witness. A young Paco's mother, Margot, being interviewed by press. Photo courtesy of Alex Badayos BACKGROUND INFORMATION | 9 DISCUSSION GUIDE Give Up Tomorrow prisoner named Davidson Rusia confessed that he was among the gang sought for kidnapping, raping and murdering the Chiong sisters. When the trial got underway, the prosecution questioned Rusia for days, while Pacos counsel was given 30 minutes for cross-examination. Thelma Chiong called Rusia a gift from God and even brought the alleged double murderer birthday gifts in prison. Rusias cellmates would later claim he had been repeatedly tortured by police before confessing. The Philippines has no jury system, so Pacos fate rested in the hands of the judge in the case, Martin Ocampo, who made the defense teams work difficult, even jailing them for protesting his decision to throw out expert testimony questioning the identification of Marijoy Chiongs body. When Pacos fellow students and instructors took the stand to verify his alibi, the judge cut short their testimony, declaring that there were too many witnesses. Paco was never allowed to take the stand. Judge Martin Ocampo, who was even seen sleeping through parts of the proceedings, took three months to write his decision. The verdict, reached two years after the crime, was devastating: Paco and his co- defendants were found guilty and received two consecutive life sentences. Under Philippine law, a guilty verdict required the death penalty, so why did the judge rule otherwise? He admitted there was insufficient proof that the corpse was Marijoy Chiongs. You dont know the pressure Im under, he told reporters who asked if he feared for his life. Five months later, he committed suicide. The Chiong family was outraged that the young men had not received the death penalty, and their ally President Estrada asked the Department of Justice to change the sentence. The Larraaga family appealed to the Supreme Court to protest the many violations of Pacos constitu- tional rights. Thelma Chiong and her sisters dismayed reaction to the judge's verdict of life imprisonment rather than the death penalty. Photo courtesy of Alex Badayos BACKGROUND INFORMATION | 10 DISCUSSION GUIDE Give Up Tomorrow Lawyers assured the family that Pacos case was strong. On February 3, 2004, Pacos mother, like millions of others, would hear the news of the appeal on television. Her son was not only found guilty, but now was sentenced to death by lethal injection. But in another twist, the courts new verdict awakened widespread support for the accused young men. Student witnesses joined Catholic priest Father Reyes in organizing a run to raise awareness around the case, and Paco's family sought new avenues for justice. Because his father was Spanish, Paco was also a Spanish citizen. The family appealed to Spain for help and Amnesty International led a nationwide campaign that generated huge momentum. In November 2004, activists delivered a petition with nearly 300,000 signatures to the embassy of the Philippines in Madrid. The countrys Supreme Court, led by a chief justice related to Thelma Chiong, refused to budge. In a final effort, Pacos lawyers submitted his case to the United Nations Commission on Human Rights, which called for his release. The Spanish government asked Philippine President Gloria Arroyo, who had replaced President Estrada following his removal on corruption charges, to grant Paco clemency. She vowed that Pacos life would be saved and, astonishingly, abolished the nations death penalty in June 2006. The two countries agreed that Paco would be transferred to Spain to serve the remainder of his life sentence. Thelma Chiong triedbut failedto prevent the transfer. Paco and his family hoped that his transfer to Spain would set him off on a path to freedom, but the Spanish prison review board would only recommend Paco for parole if he would admit his guilt. More than two years after his transfer to Spain and 15 years after his arrest, Paco remains in prison but now benefits from an additional privilege of the Spanish penal system: Due to time already served, he is granted occasional therapeutic leaves (a few days every month) at the prison boards discretion, which means he receives permission to leave during daytime hours to study and work. The Republic of the Philippines retains jurisdiction over the case. The co-accused at the trial. Photo courtesy of Alex Badayos BACKGROUND INFORMATION | 11 DISCUSSION GUIDE Give Up Tomorrow Philippines Country Profile Location: The Republic of the Philippines is a chain of 7,107 islands in the western part of the Pacific Ocean, covering an area of 115,830 square miles in Southeast Asia. The country is divided into three areas: Luzon to the north, Visayas in the center and Mindanao to the south. Manila, the capital city where Paco attended culinary school, is located in Luzon. Cebu, the home of the Larraaga and Chiong families, is located in central Visayas. The archipelago was formed by volcanic activity, and is mostly mountainous with areas of coastal lowlands. With 20 active volcanoes, the Philippines is part of the Pacific Ring of Fire and is thus prone to seismic activity. The countrys tropical climate also makes it susceptible to typhoons. Population: The Philippines has a population of 98 million (2012 estimate). More than 150 native languages and dialects are spoken in the Philippines, and there are four principal languages: Cebuano, spoken in Visayas; Tagalog, spoken around Manila; Ilocano, spoken in northern Luzon; and Maranao, spoken in Mindanao. To establish national unity, the government promotes the use of Filipino, based on Tagalog, as the national language, and it is taught all over the country. English is also an official language of the country, and many speak it as a second language. The Philippines has one of the highest literacy rates of developing countries, with over 93 percent of the population over 10 years of age able to read. The gender gap is significantly close with regard to health and education. The crowd outside the Palace of Justice. Photo courtesy of Alex Badayos BACKGROUND INFORMATION | 12 DISCUSSION GUIDE Give Up Tomorrow Due to over 400 years of Spanish and American rule, more than 90 percent of the population is Christian. A small Muslim population also exists, around 4.6 percent, concen- trated in central and western Mindanao. Some smaller forest tribes still live in the more remote areas of Mindanao. With a gross domestic product per capita of $2,370 in 2011, economic growth in the Philippines has averaged 5 percent over the past year, with a 7.6 percent growth rate in 2010, the highest in 20 years. Since the global financial crisis and recession, efforts have been made to develop programs that boost infrastructure, and as a result the economy has been relatively stable and resilient. Government: The Philippines is a representative democracy modeled after the U.S. system of government. Under the 1987 consti- tution, ratified under the Corazon Aquino administration, a government was established with three branchesthe executive, with a president limited to one six-year term; a bicameral legislature; and an independent judiciary. The senate consists of 24 members who serve six-year terms; half of them are elected every three years. The House of Representatives is made up of 285 members, 229 of whom represent single-member districts. Party-list represen- tatives, or party representatives elected at large, occupy the remaining 56 seats. Representatives serve three-year terms and a maximum of three consecutive terms. Under the constitution, the number of members of the House of Representatives is limited to 250. However, a 2010 Supreme Court ruling allows additional party members to sit in, if they attained the required number of votes. Some of the major issues affecting the political climate of the country are corruption, cronyism and nepotism. There are several families at the forefront of society, and they hold a large share of both political power and economic wealth. The incumbent president, Benigno Aquino III, ran on an anti-corruption platform. He took office in June 2010. Under his administration, a Truth Commission was established. This body, led by former Supreme Court chief justice Hilario Davide, Jr., was formed to investigate charges of corruption, election rigging and human rights abuses during the previous administration under Gloria Arroyo. As of the end of 2011, Arroyo had been placed on house arrest pending trial, and the chief justice she had appointed to the Supreme Court had been impeached and found guilty of corruption. The next presidential election is slated for May 2016. Justice: The Supreme Court of the Philippines is composed of 15 justices, appointed by the president with recommendations from the judicial and bar council. The justices serve on the court until they reach the age of 70. Other courts include the Court of Appeals, and the Sandiganbayan (Peoples Advocate), a special court for cases involving corruption of government officials. While the Philippines has adopted a legal framework similar to that of the United States, it has not implemented a jury system. A judge hears the case and issues a ruling. In Paco Larraagas case, it was Judge Martin Ocampo who heard the evidence and adjourned the court for three months to write his decision. As a result of massive case backlogs and low salaries, the legal system is fraught with inefficiencies and corruption. Only one percent of the national budget is allocated to the judiciary, so very often judges and lawyers become dependent on local politicians for resources, which allows political influence to trickle in. This culture of impunity has made the Philippines one of the most dangerous places for employees in the court system. Since 1999, at least 12 judges have been killed, and the perpetrators remain unpunished. Sources: Election Guide. Philippines. http://electionguide.org/country.php?ID=171 Freedom House. Philippines. http://www.freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2012/philippines Reuters. Philippines Aquino Sets Up Truth Commission. June 29, 2010. http://in.reuters.com/article/2010/06/29/idINIndia-49743820100629 U.S. Department of State. Background Note: Philippines. http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/2794.htm The World Bank. GDP Per Capita. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD The World Bank. Philippines Overview. http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/philippines/overview BACKGROUND INFORMATION | 13 DISCUSSION GUIDE Give Up Tomorrow Cases of Wrongful Conviction Though Give Up Tomorrow highlights only one case within the Philippine judicial system, it illuminates a larger concern over wrongful conviction, both in the Philippines and worldwide. The Supreme Court of the Philippines released information in 2004 that cited a 71.77 percent judicial error rate in capital cases in the period from 1993 to 2004, when capital punishment was still legal, a percentage determined by the total number of death convictions that had been either reversed or pardoned. During this time, 651 of 907 convicted persons were saved from lethal injection due to wrongful conviction. In recognition of this high error rate, the Supreme Court issued a ruling on DNA evidence that allows post-conviction DNA testing without need of prior court order, although it also requires that a relevant biological sample exist and that testing be likely to result in the reversal or modification of the conviction. Wrongful convictions are not unique to the Philippines. According to a report released by Columbia University researchers in May 2012, there have been a total of 2,061 inmate and ex-convicts exonerated of serious crimes in the United States since 1989. Worldwide, DNA evidence has assisted in clearing the names of hundreds of wrongfully- convicted prisoners, many of whom were on death row or facing other serious sentences. Use of DNA technology to revisit past convictions has led to 297 exonerations in the Judge Martin Ocampo Photo courtesy of Alex Badayos BACKGROUND INFORMATION | 14 DISCUSSION GUIDE Give Up Tomorrow United States alone. Organizations like the Innocence Project view this as an indicator of systemic faults in the justice system of the United States and note that there may be thousands in the system who were wrongfully convicted, at least some of them impossible to exonerate because there is no DNA evidence for their cases. Lengthy police station stays and interro- gations are just one of many reasons for wrongful convictions, which vary based on the particular case and country. According to the Death Penalty Information Center, wrongful conviction in death penalty cases was due in 45 percent of cases to eyewitness misidentification, in 17 percent to government misconduct, in 10 percent to snitches, in 9 percent to mishandled evidence or unqualified experts, in 8 percent to false confession and in 29 percent to other causes, including hearsay and questionable circumstantial evidence. (The totals add up to more than 100 percent because in many cases there is a combination of causes at work.) In the United States, eyewitness misidentifi- cation was a factor in 72 percent of post-conviction DNA exoneration cases. It has been reported by many organizations studying this phenomenon that race may play a role, as 40 percent of identifications are cross-racial and some studies have shown that it may be more difficult for people to identify someone of a race that is not their own. Sources: Asia Times Online. Wrongful Conviction Puts Spotlight on Japanese Justice. http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Japan/NF30Dh01.html Innocence Project. The Causes of Wrongful Conviction. http://www.innocenceproject.org/understand Innocence Project. Eyewitness Identification Reform. http://www.innocenceproject.org/Content/Eyewitness_ Identification_Reform.php Innocence Project. Facts on Post-conviction DNA Exonerations. http://www.innocenceproject.org/Content/Facts_on_PostConviction_ DNA_Exonerations.php The Week. 25 Years of Wrongful Convictions: By the Numbers. http://theweek.com/article/index/228292/25-years-of-wrongful- convictions-by-the-numbers Margot Larraaga and Thelma Chiong, the two mothers fighting for polarized versions of justice. Photo courtesy of Arni Aclao BACKGROUND INFORMATION | 15 DISCUSSION GUIDE Give Up Tomorrow Prisoner Transfer Treaties As a dual citizen of the Philippines and Spain, Paco Larraaga was moved to a Spanish prison under what is known as the RP-Spain Transfer of Sentenced Persons Agreement (TSPA). Signed on May 18, 2007 and approved by the senates of both countries, this treaty allows foreign prisoners to be sent to their countries of nationality to serve out the rest of their sentences. As of 2011, the Philippine government had established prisoner transfer agreements with five different nations China, Canada, Cuba, Thailand and Spain. Though Pacos case is an exception, the origin of prisoner transfer treaties is largely humanitarianthey are typically issued to protect nationals who are incarcerated abroad under abusive and inhumane conditions. The sentencing country (in Pacos case the Philippines) retains sole power over whether or not the convicted person will be granted amnesty or pardon, but the treaty is dependent on the cooperation of partner nations and encourages cordial international relations. In this case, Spain has the option to ask the Philippines for clemency for Paco. The RP-Spain TSPA permits transfers to be carried out only if certain criteria are met. The sentenced person must be a national of the state to which he or she is being transferred; the committed offense must be criminally punishable both in the country of offense and the country of nationality; the sentence must be final and without other legal recourse; and the sentenced person must have consented to the transfer, satisfied any payment of fines and have at least Co-defendant Josman Aznar being escorted out after the verdict. Photo courtesy of Alex Badayos BACKGROUND INFORMATION | 16 DISCUSSION GUIDE Give Up Tomorrow one year left to serve. In Paco Larraagas case, the Chiong family reportedly received 750,000 Philippine pesos in civil damages from the Larraaga family (an amount equivalent to approximately $18,000 in 2012). Once a sentenced person or either partner nation confirms that all of these criteria apply, a transfer request may be submitted to the central authority of the state holding the individual. Prisoner transfer agreements also exist in Australia, Japan, the Americas and several European countries. This type of agreement made national headlines in the United States when three British businessmen (the so-called NatWest Three) pled guilty to fraud during the 2007 Enron case and were transferred to the United Kingdom prison system after serving only six months of a 37-month sentence. Records kept by the U.S. International Prison Transfer Unit (the branch of the U.S. Department of Justice that presides over prison transfer agreements involving the United States) reveal that 595 foreign nationals were sent back to their home countries from United States prisons between 2008 and 2010 and 163 Americans returned from prisons abroad in that same time period. Sources: abs-cbnNEWS.com. Larraaga Turned Over to Spain. http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/nation/10/06/09/larra%C3%B1aga- turned-over-spain Council of Europe. Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/112.htm Lee-Brago, Pia. DFA Chief Defends RP-Spain Prison Transfer Treaty. The Philippine Star, September 12, 2009. http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?articleId=504546&publicationSu bCategoryId=63 A scene from Give Up Tomorrow. Photo courtesy of Alex Badayos BACKGROUND INFORMATION | 17 DISCUSSION GUIDE Give Up Tomorrow Media Responsibility in the Philippines The medias involvement in the Chiong case seemed unjust and biased to many observers. From the recorded re- enactment that demonized the seven young men on trial to news broadcasts that referred to Paco Larraaga by various derogatory names, media responsibility became a point of contention for Larraagas domestic and interna- tional supporters. In 2011, the Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism issued a proposal for a publication that would illustrate the Philippine medias sensational reporting on rape and would recommend ethical guidelines for journalists. The proposed publication would focus on the Chiong rape case, specif- ically, and would cite articles published in the media outlets that covered the case, including the Philippine Daily Inquirer, Philippine Star, Manila Bulletin, Manila Times and the tabloids Bulgar, Tempo and Abante. In a July 2012 opinion piece on the GMA News website, blogger and essayist Katrina Stuart Santiago revisited the medias involvement in the Chiong case. She writes that the media saw the bad boy stereotype and sold it to us as the truth behind, if not the premise of, this story of crime. Certainly this was the state of media in 1997, in a grand display of gross sensationalism and absolutely biased reportage that Im sure any media personality would want to deny. To date, much of the attention paid to media responsibility in the Philippines has focused on journalists charged with The accused being interviewed by journalists. Photo courtesy of Alex Badayos BACKGROUND INFORMATION | 18 DISCUSSION GUIDE Give Up Tomorrow libel against politicians. For example, in 2005, five journalists in Cebu were charged for publishing stories about a mayors alleged involvement in a bank robbery of nearly 100 million pesos. In 2012, a forum was organized by the Cebu Citizens-Press Council in recognition of World Press Freedom Day. Gabriel T. Ingles, associate justice at the Philippine Court of Appeals, supported Justice Vicente Mendozas idea of distin- guishing between political and private libel. In June 2011, the Committee to Protect Journalists ranked the Philippines third in its impunity index, which calculates unsolved media killings as a percentage of each country's population. In a 2005 report on a study of freedom of expression and the media in the Philippines and six other Asian countries, Article 19, an interna- tional human rights organization that defends and promotes freedom of expression and freedom of information worldwide, pointed to the failure of the Philippine mass media to provide citizens with balanced and objective information they need on matters such as their own rights. Sources: Article 19. Freedom of Expression and the Media in the Philippines. http://www.article19.org/data/files/pdfs/publications/philippines- baseline-study.pdf Center for Media Freedom & Responsibility. Cebu Journalists Face Libel Suit. http://www.cmfr-phil.org/2005/10/06/cebu-journalists-face-libel-suit/ GMA News. The Refusal to Give Up Today. http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/267007/opinion/the- refusal-to-give-up-today Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism. Reporting on Rape. http://www.scribd.com/doc/50091078/Reporting-on-Rape-Media- Coverage-Content-Analysis Solidarity Philippines Australia Network. Statement on Press Freedom in the Philippines. http://cpcabrisbane.org/Kasama/1999/V13n3/Press.htm SunStar Cebu. Forum Discusses Libel in Media. http://www.sunstar.com.ph/cebu/local-news/2012/05/05/forum- discusses-libel-media-219824 Paco's mother, Margot, reading the latest headlines on his case. Photo courtesy of Alex Badayos BACKGROUND INFORMATION | 19 DISCUSSION GUIDE Give Up Tomorrow Paco Larraaga Mimi, Pacos sister Jaime, Pacos brother-in-law (Mimis husband) Manuel and Margot, Pacos parents Imanol, Pacos brother Maisha, Pacos cousin in Spain Tatat, Pacos aunt in Spain Marijoy and Jacqueline Jackie Chiong, the missing girls Thelma and Dionisio Chiong, parents of the victims Cheryl Jimenea, Thelma Chiongs sister Selected People Featured in Give Up Tomorrow The Families BACKGROUND INFORMATION | 20 DISCUSSION GUIDE Give Up Tomorrow Leo Lastimosa Suzzane Salva Teddy Locsin, Jr. Dong Puno Solita Monsod Lucia Gomez Selected People Featured in Give Up Tomorrow Journalists and Television Personalities Napoleon Estilles, senior police superintendent and friend of the employer of Dionisio Chiong Pablo Labra, police inspector, arresting officer and winner of Cebus 1997 Outstanding Policeman award Teresita Galanida, prosecuting attorney Judge Martin Ocampo, trial judge Selected People Featured in Give Up Tomorrow Law Enforcement and Government Investigators Mike Armovit, defense attorney Sandy Coronel, defense attorney Sarah de Mas, Fair Trials International Advocates and Legal Advisors BACKGROUND INFORMATION | 21 DISCUSSION GUIDE Give Up Tomorrow Immediately after the film, you may want to give people a few quiet moments to reflect on what they have seen. If the mood seems tense, you can pose a general question and give people some time to themselves to jot down or think about their answers before opening the discussion: If you could ask anyone in the film a single question, who would it be and what would you ask him or her? What did you learn from this film? What insights did it provide? If a friend asked you what this film was about, what would you say? Describe a moment or scene in the film that you found particularly disturbing or moving. What was it about that scene that was especially compelling for you? GENERAL DISCUSSION QUESTIONS | 22 DISCUSSION GUIDE Give Up Tomorrow Dionoso and Thelma Chiong light candles for their daughters. Photo courtesy of Alex Badayos DISCUSSION PROMPTS | 23 DISCUSSION GUIDE Give Up Tomorrow The Justice System What is the role of an unbiased court and the rule of law in a civil society? What happens when people stop trusting the justice system? Beyond this case, can you think of instances in which a sizable number of citizens stopped trusting their countrys legal system? What happened as a result? Based on what you see in the film, how do laws and policies prevent or facilitate corruption? Consider things like hiring processes, how one earns a license to practice law, requirements for arrest and detention and who has a say in whether or not a prosecution moves forward. Following the trial, those involved in the prosecution and conviction received promotions. What was your reaction to this news? When are promotions a natural and appropriate reward for success and when are they evidence of corruption? Paco Larraagas attorney Sandy Coronel says in the film, To lose hope in this case would be to concede the entire justice system. Because I see this case as a test of how effective and how real our justice system works. What was your reaction to that statement? If this was a test case, how do you think the Filipino justice system fared in the end? Prosecution witnesses received reward money. Should witnesses ever receive payment for their testimony? If not, why not? If so, under what circumstances? How does being in prison change Paco? What does this suggest about the practice of imprisoning people while they await trial? Jos Bono, Spains minister of defense at the time, asks the president of the Philippines to commute Pacos death sentence. In your view, is Spain overstepping its bounds and interfering with the justice system of a sovereign nation? Do you think Spain should play a role in this situation? Fair Trials International, Amnesty International and the United Nations Commission on Human Rights all get involved in Pacos case. Given what you see in the film, is it advisable to involve independent human rights groups in these matters? What are those groups able to do that others are not? Judge Martin Ocampo Photo courtesy of Alex Badayos DISCUSSION PROMPTS | 24 DISCUSSION GUIDE Give Up Tomorrow The Arrest Journalists indicate that police were under a great deal of pressure to solve this crime. What factors create pressure on the police? Under what circumstances do acceptable factors (e.g., eliminating possible danger to the public) give way to undue influence that leads to mistakes or corruption? Inspector Pablo Labra zeroed in on Paco because Pacos name appeared in police records (the result of a minor scuffle in 1995). In your experience, what does a criminal record do to a persons reputation? How many people in your community, family or circle of friends have criminal records? How do you think this influences peoples perceptions of them? Thelma and Dionisio Chiong say that Paco pursued Marijoy Chiong and she rejected him, implying that he was a spurned suitor. What is the impact of this statement on the general public? What does it suggest about the cultures beliefs about men and masculinity? Evidence If you were telling the story from Chiongs side, how would you explain each piece of evidence, each trial decision and each coincidence? What if you were telling the story from the Larraaga familys point of view? Thirty-five witnesses signed affidavits stating that they were with Paco in Manila while the alleged crime was happening in Cebu. What made this alibi evidence believable or not believable? Which of the witnesses do you find believable and why do you find those people convincing? Pacos sister Mimi says, You know, at first, Mrs. Chiong had my sympathies. Im a mom, too. I have a daughter, too. And I felt her pain. Did you share her sympathy? What makes Mimi change her mind? Paco and Josman Aznar standby during the trial. Photo courtesy of Alex Badayos DISCUSSION PROMPTS | 25 DISCUSSION GUIDE Give Up Tomorrow The filmmakers present several coincidences. What conclusions do you draw from these events?: Paco was arrested by plainclothes police officers who did not have a warrant or proper I.D. The arresting officers also worked as bodyguards for the alleged drug lord Shortly before the murders, Dionisio Chiongs trucking business was under investigation for drug trafficking. He was scheduled to testify against his boss, in front of a congressional committee on drugs, but before the scheduled date his daughters disappeared and he decided not to testify. Cheryl Jimenea, Thelma Chiongs sister, supervised a raid of the Larraaga family farm based on reports of screams coming from the property. After the trial, Judge Martin Ocampo was found dead in a hotel room with a suicide note. While Pacos case was on appeal, President Joseph Estrada was convicted of corruption and removed from office. The chief justice of the Supreme Court of the Philippines, which rejected international pleas to suspend imposition of the death penalty, is related to Thelma Chiong. Thelma Chiong on the witness stand. Photo courtesy of Alex Badayos DISCUSSION PROMPTS | 26 DISCUSSION GUIDE Give Up Tomorrow Trial Procedure What was the role of the victims family in the prosecution of this crime? In your view, what is the proper role for victim families? Davidson Rusia is arrested and confesses, then implicates Paco and the others, in exchange for his freedom. Do you find his story to be credible? Why or why not? Prosecuting attorney Teresita Galanida points out that the Philippine legal system does not use juries. Only a judge actually hears evidence. What are the strengths and weakness of that system? The defense seeks a change of venue from Cebu to Manila. If it were up to you, what criteria would you use to decide whether or not to move a trial out of the community where the crime was committed? What is your explanation for these trial rulings? How do you think Ocampo would have explained them?: The judge refused to hear testimony from many of Pacos alibi witnesses. Cross-examination of key prosecution witness Davidson Rusia was limited. The judge excluded forensic evidence that challenged the identification of the body. When defense lawyers challenged that ruling, the judge jailed the lawyers and continued the trial with lawyers that he appointed. Paco was not allowed to testify in his own defense. In explaining his sentence of life imprisonment, Judge Ocampo says, You have to follow what the law says. Given this statement, how do you think Paco ended up being sentenced to death? A prosecution witness points to the accused during the trial. Photo courtesy of Alex Badayos The Impact and Response What is the significance of the films title? Paco Larraagas father, Manuel, says, As parents we feel incredibly helpless... if we fall, our son falls. What is the role of family support in Pacos survival? As is the case with most convictions, the consequences extend beyond the sentences served by the defendants. How do Pacos trial and conviction affect the members of his family? How about his classmates or the community in which he lived? Mimi says that after the death sentence was imposed we didnt know how to comfort him. How do you tell him, Im sorry for this injustice. Im sorry that it happened to you? What would you tell Paco? The death sentence shakes Mimis faith in God. How does Father Reyes response to the injustice help restore that faith? What are the other ripple effects of the choice made by Father Reyes, and the other runners, to take a public stand in support of Paco? Compare those ripple effects to the effects of the verdict itself and the corruption that was behind it. DISCUSSION PROMPTS | 27 DISCUSSION GUIDE Give Up Tomorrow A court clerk reads the final verdict. Photo courtesy of Alex Badayos DISCUSSION PROMPTS | 28 DISCUSSION GUIDE Give Up Tomorrow Justice The Arroyo administration ultimately abolishes the death penalty. What does Pacos case offer that could or should inform current debates over the death penalty? Despite Thelma Chiongs attempts to obstruct the transfer, Paco is ultimately sent to Spain. Why doesnt the transfer end this case for the Philippines? What else would need to happen for the matter to be fully resolved? What would it take to restore justice in the Philippines? In Spain, the prison review board says that it will grant parole to Paco if he admits his guilt. Paco responds, How can I assume something I didnt do? I can never admit guilt because I am not guilty. Id rather have the death penalty again than admit a crime that I didnt do. If you were Paco, how do you think you would respond to this Catch-22? At this point, what would justice look like for Paco? The Role of Media How would you describe the role that journalists played in convicting Paco and in freeing him? How did media outlets benefit from reporting on, and sensationalizing, the murders and the trial? Pacos mother says, My mother comes from a political family. Her family name is Osmea. So the media always would put Paco, the scion of a political and wealthy family. We are not wealthy. My husband works so hard. We have a farm and he works so hard so that we can have our daily living. What role do you think class and ethnicity played in Pacos arrest and prosecution and the publicity surrounding the case? Why would the media cast Paco as the scion of Thelma Chiong and the Crusade Against Violence. Photo courtesy of Alex Badayos DISCUSSION PROMPTS | 29 DISCUSSION GUIDE Give Up Tomorrow a political and wealthy family? What is the appeal of a presumably rich young man going to jail? At the beginning of the film, reporters and investigators ask Paco questions such as, Who do you think framed you? If you had been interviewing him, would these have been your questions? What questions would you have asked? Television personality Teddy Locsin, Jr. calls the boys animals and drug addicts, and he derogatorily describes Paco as a Spanish-blooded mestizo. What role do word choices, labels and prejudice play in shaping peoples perceptions of the defendants and their case? A re-enactment of the crime based on Rusias testimony is broadcast nationally while the trial is occurring. Should media outlets be prevented from airing such broadcasts, or do they have the right to do so as part of free speech or their duty to keep the public informed? If you were a regulator, what guidelines would you offer to govern such re-enactments? Journalist Leo Lastimosa says, Its so easy to manipulate people. Its so easy to exploit drama and tragedies and calamities to favor selfish interests. In this case, who did the manipulating and exploiting? How did they manage it in the face of such overwhelming evidence of Pacos innocence? Paco's parents, Manuel and Margot, being interviewed by reporters in Spain. Photo courtesy of Alex Badayos Additional media literacy questions are available at: www.pbs.org/pov/educators/media-literacy.php Taking Action Conduct fundraisers or public information campaigns to support the efforts of human rights organizations like Amnesty International or Fair Trials International to free people who have been unjustly imprisoned. In the United States, local affiliates of the Innocence Project can provide suggestions on how to start or where to find support for ongoing initiatives. Visit http://freepaconow.com/ and explore ways to get involved in the Free Paco Now campaign Research jail and prison conditions in your state, especially conditions for people awaiting trial (who have not yet been convicted of anything). Compare them to the conditions you see in the film. Decide what changes, if any, should take place and make a plan of action to address the needs. As an alternative, meet with the families of people who are incarcerated and listen to their experiences and their needs. Discuss ways your community could help meet those needs. Convene a screening of Give Up Tomorrow as part of a teach-in or debate on the proposition that the United States should follow the example set by the Philippines and abolish the death penalty. | 30 DISCUSSION GUIDE Give Up Tomorrow Father Reyes and fellow supporters at a run to raise awareness around Paco's case. Photo courtesy of Alex Badayos FREE PACO NOW http://freepaconow.com/case-documents Advocates for Pacos release have gathered documents related to the case. Available in English and Spanish. FAIR TRIALS INTERNATIONAL www.fairtrials.net/cases/article/francisco_juan_ larranaga_paco This organization assists individuals accused of crimes who are being held in foreign prisons and it helped to bring Pacos case before the United Nations Commission on Human Rights. REPRIEVE http://www.reprieve.org.uk/cases/pacolarranaga Reprieve uses the law to enforce the human rights of prisoners, from death row to Guantnamo Bay. The group investigates, litigates and educates, providing legal support to prisoners unable to pay for it themselves. This page provides information regarding the Larraaga case. Human Rights and the Death Penalty AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL www.amnesty.org/en/region/philippines/report-2012 For the current status of human rights in the Philippines, access this report from Amnesty International. Also of interest is the groups information on abolishing the death penalty (www.amnesty.org/en/death-penalty) and its petition in support of Paco (www.es.amnesty.org/ actua/acciones/filipinas-espanol-condenado-a-muerte/). CHANGE.ORG http://criminaljustice.change.org Change.org is an online hub for social change that hosts online communities for 20 major causes, including prison reform. With a team of hundreds of writers and nonprofit partners, it serves as a central platform for promoting movements for social change on the Web. The section on criminal justice provides information about broken prison systems around the globe and how governments are working to address the issue. HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH www.hrw.org/search/apachesolr_search/philippines This link brings up current headlines related to human rights in the Philippines on the groups website. Search for the term death penalty to see stories about current death penalty cases across the globe. RESOURCES | 31 DISCUSSION GUIDE Give Up Tomorrow FILMMAKER WEBSITE www.pacodocu.com The films official website includes video in Spanish, the filmmakers blog, an update on Paco and information on the Free Paco Now campaign. Original Online Content on POV To further enhance the broadcast, POV has produced an interactive website to enable viewers to explore the film in greater depth. The Give Up Tomorrow websitewww.pbs.org/pov/giveuptomorrow/offers a streaming video trailer for the film; a list of related websites, articles and books; a downloadable discussion guide; and special features, including deleted scenes and updates on Pacos case. INNOCENCE PROJECT www.innocenceproject.org The Innocence Project is a national litigation and public policy organization dedicated to exonerating wrongfully convicted people through DNA testing and to reforming the criminal justice system to prevent future injustice. Law students handle case work while supervised by a team of attorneys and staff. PROCON.ORG http://deathpenalty.procon.org This site, which focuses on the United States, provides an overview of the policy debate regarding the death penalty, as well as information about the history of the death penalty and its implementation. There are also links to Amnesty Internationals global reports on which nations still carry out death sentences. UNITED NATIONS OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS www.ohchr.org On Larraagas behalf, this office pressured the Philippine government. The offices website provides country-by- country reports, as well as general information on human rights. RESOURCES | 32 DISCUSSION GUIDE Give Up Tomorrow Thelma Chiong at a vigil with the Crusade Against Violence. Photo courtesy of Alex Badayos HOW TO BUY THE FILM To order Give Up Tomorrow, go to www.shoppbs.org The See it On PBS logo is a trademark of the Public Broadcasting Service and is used with permission. All rights reserved. Produced by American Documentary, Inc. and beginning its 25th season on PBS in 2012, the award-winning POV series is the longest-running showcase on American television to feature the work of todays best independent documentary filmmakers. Airing June through September with primetime specials during the year, POV has brought more than 300 acclaimed documen- taries to millions nationwide and has a Webby Award-winning online series, POVs Borders. Since 1988, POV has pioneered the art of presentation and outreach using independent nonfiction media to build new communities in conversation about todays most pressing social issues. Visit www.pbs.org/pov. POV Digital www.pbs.org/pov POVs award-winning website extends the life of our films online with interactive features, interviews, updates, video and educational content, as well as listings for television broadcasts, community screenings and films available online. The POV Blog is a gathering place for documentary fans and filmmakers to discuss their favorite films and get the latest news. POV Community Engagement and Education www.pbs.org/pov/outreach POV films can be seen at more than 450 events nationwide every year. Together with schools, organizations and local PBS stations, POV facilitates free community screenings and produces free resources to accompany our films, including discussion guides and curriculum-based lesson plans. With our community partners, we inspire dialogue around the most important social issues of our time. Major funding for POV is provided by PBS, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, National Endowment for the Arts, The Educational Foundation of America, New York State Council on the Arts, New York City Department of Cultural Affairs, FACT and public television viewers. Funding for POV's Diverse Voices Project is provided by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts. Special support provided by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. POV is presented by a consortium of public television stations, including KQED San Francisco, WGBH Boston and THIRTEEN in association with WNET.ORG. American Documentary, Inc. www.amdoc.org American Documentary, Inc. (AmDoc) is a multimedia company dedicated to creating, identifying, and presenting contemporary stories that express opinions and perspectives rarely featured in mainstream-media outlets. AmDoc is a catalyst for public culture, developing collaborative strategic- engagement activities around socially relevant content on television, online, and in community settings. These activities are designed to trigger action, from dialogue and feedback to educational opportunities and community participation. Front cover: Paco Larraaga behind bars, being interviewed by a news reporter, shortly after he was arrested for the kidnap, rape and murder of two sisters in the Philippines. Photo courtesy of Arni Aclao You can follow us on Twitter @POVengage for the latest news from POV Community Engagement & Education. 25th Anniversary Partner: Media Sponsor: 25th Anniversary Partner: