Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 206 views

    Loose Vs Tight Coupling Slides

    Uploaded by

    Narayanan Mayandi
    This document summarizes a presentation about tightly coupled vs loosely coupled differential pairs. It defines tight coupling as having 2% or more crosstalk, while loose coupling has very little crosstalk. Test results showed that noise injected into one half of a pair did not significantly couple over to the other half for either tight or loose coupling. Eye patterns also showed no significant differences between various differential pair structures tested, including microstrip, stripline, and broadside coupling. The conclusions were that loose and tight coupling performed similarly in this passive board test.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Loose Vs Tight Coupling Slides

    Uploaded by

    Narayanan Mayandi
    206 views20 pages
    This document summarizes a presentation about tightly coupled vs loosely coupled differential pairs. It defines tight coupling as having 2% or more crosstalk, while loose coupling has very little crosstalk. Test results showed that noise injected into one half of a pair did not significantly couple over to the other half for either tight or loose coupling. Eye patterns also showed no significant differences between various differential pair structures tested, including microstrip, stripline, and broadside coupling. The conclusions were that loose and tight coupling performed similarly in this passive board test.

    Original Description:

    loose or tight coupling slides

    Original Title

    Loose vs Tight Coupling Slides

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document summarizes a presentation about tightly coupled vs loosely coupled differential pairs. It defines tight coupling as having 2% or more crosstalk, while loose coupling has very little crosstalk. Test results showed that noise injected into one half of a pair did not significantly couple over to the other half for either tight or loose coupling. Eye patterns also showed no significant differences between various differential pair structures tested, including microstrip, stripline, and broadside coupling. The conclusions were that loose and tight coupling performed similarly in this passive board test.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    206 views20 pages

    Loose Vs Tight Coupling Slides

    Uploaded by

    Narayanan Mayandi
    This document summarizes a presentation about tightly coupled vs loosely coupled differential pairs. It defines tight coupling as having 2% or more crosstalk, while loose coupling has very little crosstalk. Test results showed that noise injected into one half of a pair did not significantly couple over to the other half for either tight or loose coupling. Eye patterns also showed no significant differences between various differential pair structures tested, including microstrip, stripline, and broadside coupling. The conclusions were that loose and tight coupling performed similarly in this passive board test.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 20

    Tight vs.

    Loose Coupling of Differential Pairs


    Ray Mitchell PLX Technology 408-962-3410 [email protected]
    PCB West March 28, 2006
    Main Selector Previous Slide Help Slide

    Outline
    Review of differential pair properties and how they differ between tightly and loosely coupled pairs. Description of test set-up used to look at signal integrity through several different differential pair architectures. Results and Conclusions. Q and A

    Main Selector

    Previous Slide

    PCB West 2006

    Definitions
    For the purposes of this talk . . . Tightly Coupled refers to differential pairs that have on the order of 2% crosstalk or more. A typical configuration could be 5 mil trace width, 5 mil edge-toedge spacing. Loosely Coupled refers to pairs that have very little crosstalk. A typical configuration could be 5 mil trace width, 15 mil edge-to-edge spacing.

    Main Selector

    Previous Slide

    PCB West 2006

    Properties of Differential Pairs When Used In Cables


    Differential pairs are used in twisted pair cable assemblies to interconnect systems whose references, typically ground, are not the same. Signal swing within each half of the pair at the receiver can be quite small. The 2 halves of a twisted pair mutually couple so that outside interference appears equally on both halves of the pair and will be rejected at the receiver. EMI generation is greatly reduced. It is relatively easy to manufacture twisted pair to make within pair skew small and impedance constant.

    Main Selector

    Previous Slide

    PCB West 2006

    Properties of Differential Pairs When Used on PCBs


    Effects of voltage noise and ground bounce between driver and receiver can be mitigated. This becomes more important as edge rates increase and higher frequencies appear on the power distribution system. Signal swing within each half of the pair at the receiver can be quite small. This can be important because glass-epoxy board material can be quite lossy at high frequencies. Cross-coupling between two halves of a pair is typically quite small, even for 5 mil edge-to-edge spacing. Also, many current high speed board designs place copper plane layers next to signal layers which further isolates the two halves of a pair from each other.

    Main Selector

    Previous Slide

    PCB West 2006

    Properties of Differential Pairs When Used on PCBs (cont.)


    Tight coupling reduces the voltage swing of the individual signals within a pair. EMI generation is greatly reduced by coupling to an adjacent plane. Matching trace lengths can be layout intensive.

    Main Selector

    Previous Slide

    PCB West 2006

    Comparison of Tight vs. Loose Pairs


    Tightly Coupled Each segment of a pair must have very little skew, and the total flight time must have very little skew. If viaing to other planes, both halves of the pair must transition at the same place. Often must use serpentine traces near the driver to reduce skew. Differential impedance can change when routing to connectors/components. Loosely Coupled Each half of the pair must have the same total flight time to reduce skew. Each half of the pair can be designed as a 50 ohm transmission line. This can be maintained when routing to connectors/components. Board layout/fabrication must provide consistent impedance and propagation delay across the area of the board.

    Main Selector

    Previous Slide

    PCB West 2006

    Image Current in the Adjacent Plane Provides the Return Current


    Assume a plane separated from a signal layer by 3.5 mil. Return current will want to flow along the same X-Y path as the signal. If it is prevented from doing so, it may be difficult to determine the route it does take. This will cause impedance discontinuities and differential mode noise.

    Main Selector

    Previous Slide

    PCB West 2006

    Trying to See the Difference Between Tight and Loose Differential Pairs

    Main Selector

    Previous Slide

    Help Slide

    Test Set-Up

    Main Selector

    Previous Slide

    PCB West 2006

    Test Board Differential Pairs


    Loose Coupling 100 mil edge-edge separation. Tight Coupling 7 mil edge-edge separation. Broadside Differential Pair. Via mismatch pairs. 1 inch separation. Aggressor traces 7 mil edge-edge separation from one half of a pair. All traces are 12 inch total length.

    Main Selector

    Previous Slide

    PCB West 2006

    Tight and Loose Coupling Pairs

    Main Selector

    Previous Slide

    PCB West 2006

    Test Board Stackup


    Outer Trace Width 5.25 mil Inner Trace Width 4.00 mil Differential Spacing 6.75 mil

    50 ohm single-ended 100 ohm differential

    Main Selector

    Previous Slide

    PCB West 2006

    Noise Pickup from Aggressor


    Loose Coupling Tight Coupling

    Main Selector

    Previous Slide

    PCB West 2006

    Microstrip Pair - Eye Diagram


    Loose Coupling Tight Coupling

    Main Selector

    Previous Slide

    PCB West 2006

    Stripline Pair Eye Diagram


    Loose Coupling Tight Coupling

    Main Selector

    Previous Slide

    PCB West 2006

    Broadside Coupling Eye Diagram


    Transition Eye Non-Transition Eye

    Main Selector

    Previous Slide

    PCB West 2006

    Vias Separated by 1 Inch


    Loose Coupling Tight Coupling

    Main Selector

    Previous Slide

    PCB West 2006

    Conclusions
    Observed that noise injected into one half of a pair did not significantly couple over to the other half. Saw no significant difference in eye pattern among the differential pair structures tested. These results were obtained using a passive board. Results could be different for a board with active circuitry.

    Main Selector

    Previous Slide

    PCB West 2006

    References
    Johnson, Howard & Graham, Martin, High-Speed Digital Design, A Handbook of Black Magic. PrenticeHall, New Jersey, 1993. Ritchey, Lee & Zasio, John, Right the First Time. Speeding Edge, 2003. PLX Technology, PEX 8532 Quick Start Design Guide, v1.1. 2005.

    Main Selector

    Previous Slide

    PCB West 2006

    You might also like