- There is no restriction on the number of attempts at the Project Report Assessment. [1]
[1] References to the number of permitted attempts at the Project Report Assessment relate to ICAEW's rules and do not relate to the conditions set by individual employers for their students under a training agreement.
- The pass mark for the Project Report Assessment is 50%.
- Students may not appeal against their mark for the Project Report Assessment.
- The Project Report Assessment must be no more than 4,000 words.
- Engaging in any activity likely to give an advantage to any student will be considered misconduct. Examples of this may include (but are not limited to):
- cheating ie, failing to comply with the rules governing assessments;
- colluding ie, assisting another student to gain an advantage by any means, facilitating or receiving such assistance;
- fabricating ie, misleading or attempting to mislead the examiners by presenting work for assessment in a way which intentionally or recklessly suggests that factual information has been collected which has not in fact been collected, or falsifies factual information;
- personating ie, acting, appearing, or producing work on behalf of another student in order to deceive the examiners, or soliciting another individual to act, appear or produce work on a student’s behalf;
- plagiarising ie, incorporating within a submission, work (published or unpublished in whatever format or medium) created by another person without appropriate acknowledgement.
- ICAEW will investigate any student suspected of involvement in any irregularity or misconduct. Where a case for misconduct is to be considered, the student will be notified and given opportunity to write to explain the circumstances of the case.
- Where ICAEW believes a case of misconduct may exist this will be referred to the ICAEW Assessment Committee and/or the Professional Conduct Department for investigation and potential disciplinary action.
- ICAEW reserves the right to withhold publication of the results of an assessment, and prevent further assessment attempts, of students suspected of having been involved in any irregularity or misconduct in connection with an assessment, pending the completion of investigations into the alleged irregularity or misconduct.
|