Analisa Pressure Build Up Test

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 49

ANALISA PRESSURE BUILD UP TEST

OBJECTIVES

To understand basic principle of commonly performed


pressure test; Build up and drawdown test with simple
example of PBU & PDD analysis; The assumptions
and limitations of the tests and demonstrate how to
make interpretation from those test using package
software in obtaining the Information from well testing.
INFORMATION GATHERED FROM WELL TEST

Reservoir characteristics that can be calculated from a well test include, but are not limited
to, the following:

1. Reservoir Pressure buildup curves can be extrapolated to obtain static reservoir


pressure.
2. Permeability is a measure of the ability of the reservoir rock to transmit fluid flow.
The permeability measured by a well test is the effective permeability of the
reservoir rock for the produced fluid.
3. Transmissivity is a measure of the ability of the reservoir to transmit the fluid
contained within it. It is a function of both reservoir rock and fluid properties.
4. Skin Factor is a quantitative measure of the degree to which the permeability in
the immediate vicinity of the well bore has been altered as a result of the drilling,
completion, and production process.
5. Damage Ratio is the ratio of the theoretical production rate to the actual
production rate measured during the test. It is an indication of the degree to which
the well's productivity can be improved by removing the skin damage induced
during drilling and completion of the well.
6. Productivity During a test, the productivity of the well is measured at a flowing
pressure that may or may not represent a reasonable producing pressure. The test
results can be used to predict the productivity of the well at any desired flowing
pressure.
INFORMATION GATHERED FROM WELL TEST. CONT..

7. Radius of Investigation is the approximate radial distance from the well


bore that is investigated by the test; the test analysis results represent the
average properties of the reservoir within this radius.
8. Reservoir Anomalies within the radius of investigation include barriers
and fluid contacts. Permeability changes or layered reservoirs are often
reflected in the pressure behavior observed during a test. This information,
when used in conjunction with other data, can often help in defining the
exact type of anomaly.
9. Reservoir Depletion If an observable pressure depletion occurs during a
test, then a small reservoir has been penetrated and most likely would not
contain commercial quantities of hydrocarbons.
PRINCIPLE OF DRAWDOWN AND BUILDUP TRANSIENTS

All well tests undergo a transient or infinite-acting radial flow period at some
point in the test. As a result, an analysis technique based on this flow regime
would be universally applicable as long as this flow regime could be
recognized on the data. The following sections demonstrate how to
recognize and analyze this flow regime.

When a well is opened to flow for a


drawdown test or shut in for a buildup, a
pressure gradient, or transient, is
established between the well bore and
the reservoir. This pressure transient
propagates into the reservoir at a speed
that is directly dependent on the
reservoir's rock and fluid properties.
PRESSURE TRANSIENT PROPAGATION IN A RESERVOIR
FLOW REGIME CATEGORIES
PRESSURE BUILD UP TEST

Pressure buildup testing is the most familiar transient well-testing technique, which
has been used extensively in the petroleum industry. Basically, the test is conducted
by producing a well at constant rate for some time, shutting the well in (usually at the
surface), allowing the pressure to build up in the wellbore, and recording the down-
hole pressure in the wellbore as a function of time.

From these data, it is possible to estimate the formation permeability and current
drainage area pressure, and to characterize damage or stimulation and reservoir
heterogeneity or boundaries frequently.

In an ideal situation, we assume that the test is conducted in an infinite acting


reservoir in which no boundary effects are felt during the entire flow and later shut-in
period. The reservoir is homogeneous and containing in aslightly compressible,
single-phase fluid with uniform properties. Wellbore damage and stimulation is
concentrated in a skin of zero thickness at the wellbore. Flow into the wellbore
ceases immediately at shut-in.
A. IDEAL PRESSURE BUILD UP

If a well is shut-in after it has produced at rate q for time tp and the bottom-
hole pressure pws is recorded at time dt, then a plot of pws versus log (tp
–dt)/dt will give a straight line, which is represented by the following equation:

; and the skin factor :


EXAMPLE : Ideal Pressure Build Up
6. Read original reservoir pressure pi = 1960psia.

IDEAL PRESSURE BUILDUP GRAPH.


B. ACTUAL PRESSURE BUILD UP

Early-time region (ETR). In this region, a pressure transient is moving


through the formation nearest the wellbore.
Middle-time region (MTR). In this region, the pressure transient has
moved away from the wellbore into the bulk formation.
Late-time region (LTR). In this region, the pressure transient has
reached the drainage boundaries well.
TECHNIQUE FOR ANALYZE PBU TEST
WELLBORE STORAGE

Well bore Storage is caused when the


flow rate at the wellhead is different than
the flow rate at sandface. It is usually
caused by well bore unloading,
After flow Analysis, or changing fluid
levels. Data affected by well bore storage
effects contain little or no information
about the reservoir.
WELLBORE STORAGE /AFTER FLOW
EXAMPLE Analyzing Single-Phase and Single-Rate Pressure Buildup Test

A single-phase and single-rate pressure buildup test was conducted on an oil well. The
data is given in Table. The following well/reservoir parameters are given: Bo = 1.224
rb/stb, h = 55 ft, Poro = 0.06, rw = 0.21 ft, co = 1.5 x 10-6, and Viso = 0.65 cP, psc =
14.65 psia, T = 2000F, re = 1520ft, and Rho0 = 53.51bm/ft3.
Assume the well is draining from the center of a square. Well depth = 4500 ft, q/ = final
production rate at shut-in time = 250 stb/day, and cumulative production at shut-in time =
141,979 stb.

Determine the following:

1. At what shut-in time At does afterflow cease and boundary effect appear?
2. Formation permeability, k
3. Skin factor, s
4. Additional pressure drop near the wellbore, (Ap)skin
5. Effective wellbore radius, rwa
6. Flow efficiency FE using p*
7. Damage ratio DR using/?*
8. Productivity index, PI
9. Radius of investigation by the shut-in transient at the start and end of the MTR
10. End of wellbore storage distortion.
SOLUTION

1. Estimate the pseudo-producing time, tp,

2. Determine end of wellbore storage, time at beginning MTR and end of MTR

From the semilog graph, seems afterflow distortion disappears at (tp+dt)/dt =


2280 or dt = 6.25 hours, because of the end of the S-shaped characteristic
curve.
3. Determine p1hr and p*

p1hr = 4295psia and p* at (tp + dt)/dt = 4577psia

4. Determine permeability
5. Determine other parameter s, dPskin, rwa, FE, DR, PI, rinv.
Log-log single-rate buildup data plot.
Semilog single-rate buildup data plot.
COMPUTATIONAL MODEL

A computational model that describes the relationship between the pressure, flow rate
and reservoir rock and fluids properties In its simplest form is the diffusivity equation for
a well in the center of a circular, homogeneous, horizontal reservoir, uniform thickness
and a 1 phase fluid that obeys Darcy's law.

While the equation cannot be solved directly, indirect techniques provide a satisfactory
estimate using numerical computation.

The actual reservoir model is constructed from the basic


equation but take into account the geometry of the reservoir
(radial, linear, elliptical or spherical), number and types of
fluids and the flow regime.

The flow geometry for that area affected by the test can be the most common model
used to represent the pressure behavior of the reservoir is radial flow, where all flow
occurs radially toward the well between impermeable upper and lower boundaries at
a constant surface flow rate. The interpretation of test data will yield average
reservoir properties even when reservoir heterogeneities exist.
WELL TEST DATA INTERPRETATION

There are three major steps to a unified approach to well test data interpretation:

1. Identification of the proper model for the classification of the


reservoir (finite, infinite, homogeneous, dual porosity, dual
permeability, skin, fractures).
2. Specific analysis and calculations to estimate well and reservoir
characteristics.
3. Verification of results to ensure that the process resulted in the best
answer.

Well test interpretation is based on patterns of pressure change and the


derivative of pressure change to identify the type of reservoir behavior.
AN EFFECTIVE WAY TO INTERPRET PRESSURE DATA

1. Use a Diagnostic graph.


A diagnostic graph is a plot of the pressure change and the derivative of the
pressure change versus time on log-log paper. It can be used to identify
each flow period. Behavior specific plots can be useful to identify
heterogeneous behavior, effects of wellbore storage and high and low
conductivity fractures
2. Calculate basic reservoir parameters, such as the kh, skin and well bore
storage capacity. This can be done conventionally, through the use of
specific plots, or with type curves.
3. Compare the result from well to well and from time to time with the
same well for matching or method is to prepare and analyze a
dimensionless semi-log plot .
4. Used calculated parameters as input simulator and run to see if it
matches the input data.
CASE STUDY
PRESSURE BUILD UP TEST
WELL : ASDJ-73

TEST DATE : 26-30 MAY 2007


I. Procedure:
FLOW and PRESSURE BUILD UP PROGRAM
ASDJ-73 1. Shut-in the well at the Flowline and Master Valve.
2. Rig up Wireline unit with 2 7/8” tubing Gauge Ring, Sinker Bars and Lubricator as per
REVISION #1 Talisman Spec. Pressure Test the lubricator.
3. Slowly open the Master Valve and pressure up the lubricator.
4. RIH Gauge Ring and sinker bar to top F nipple at 1480.01 mKB. POOH
5. Shut-in the well.
6. Rig up Tandem Pressure and Temperature Recorders set for a minimum 240 hrs clock
I. Technical Data: time. Recorder Sample Rate is 3 minutes for the first 50 hours, 1 minute for the next 4
hours, then 3 minutes for the remainder of clock time.
7. Slowly Open the well to the Block Station Test facilities and flow the well on 20%
Area : Central Air Serdang Choke (same as prior to Shut-in) for 2 hours before running Pressure Recorders and 48
Well Status : Producing- Flowing oil. hours after the Pressure Recorders are landed at the F nipple. Record with DWG the
GL : 50.961 m Tubing, Casing and Flowline pressure every hour for the duration of the test.
8. Flow the well for 2 hours before starting run in hole with the Recorders.
KB : 55.176 m 9. RIH recorders while flowing to the Block Station. Record flowing pressure &
Total Depth : 1650.00 mKB temperature at depth 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 750, 900, 1050, 1200, 1350 and
SurfaceCasing : 13 3/8” 54.5 ppf. K 55 BTC R 3 set at 54.00 mKB 1400 mKB for 5 minutes each. Land the Recorders in or below the F Nipple at 1480
Intermediate Casing : 9 5/8” 40 ppf. K 55 BTC R 3 at 845.00 mKB mKB. Secure the recorders and wireline equipment.
10. Take Deadweight Gauge pressures on the Tubing, Casing, Flowline pressure every hour
Production Casing : 7” 23 ppf. K 55 BTC R 3 at 1635.00 mKB for the duration of the test.
Tubing : 2 7/8” 155 jts, Top of Firing Head and perf.gun at 1523.85 mKB 11. Record the Production Test data (Flow, Pressures, Water Cut, Gas rate etc.) every 1
F nipple at 1480.01 mKB hour for the duration of the 50 hour Flow Test.
Packer : 7” PR-3 set at 1483.10 mKB 12. After the 50 hrs flow, Shut-in the well for 72 hrs PBU. Record casing and tubing
Perforations : 1529.50 – 1536.50 mKB (BRF) pressure with DWG every hour for the duration of the PBU.
13. At the end of the 72 hour build up, conduct a Static Gradient when pulling the
Reservoir Pressure : 2000 Psi - estimated. Recorders out of the hole as follows. Record pressure and temperature at depth 1450,
Reservoir Temp : 250 deg F- estimated 1400, 1350, 1200, 1050, 900, 750, 600, 500, 400, 300, 200, 100 mKB and Surface for 7
Current production : Test May 20- 909 blpd, WC 6 %, 853 bopd. WHP 400 Psi, FLP minutes each.
170 Psi. 14. Report all the test data to reservoir engineering at Jakarta Office.

Note :
II. Objective:  Safety is Priority #1.
 Check all Emergency Shutdown system and function test the equipment before the job.
1. To measure formation productivity  Flare to be ready
 Confirm data acquisition is up and running before running in hole.
2. To measure Static Reservoir Pressure
3. To evaluate/estimate Reservoir Properties and characteristics
Jakarta, May 22, 2007

Revised by : Mark Soper and Artono

Approved by : Arif Prabawa.


Operation Manager.

Distribution :

1-Field Operation Air Serdang.


2-BBS Jakarta
ASDJ-73X
ASDJ-73X (Main
(Main Target
Target BRF)
BRF)

7
Top Baturaja Fm.

-0
ok
Depth Structure Map

95
OW
C.i : 2 m C 15
mss 14

STRUCTURAL LOCATION 89o


k-4
8

OWC 1514
ASDJ-73X

mss
Air Serdang Field
TOP BRF
Depth Structure Map
C.I: 2 m

OWC 1514
mss

BRF DEPTH STRUCTURE MAP PORO > 22%


SEISMIC ~ Lateral continuity
ASDJ-73
BRF Perforation :1529.5-1536.5m

H = 9m ; Poro = 25 %
PERM = < 10 Md ; SW = 20 %
Perforation = 7 m ; API = 31
WELL CONDITIONS
FMC GL: 50.961 m JOB PERTAMINA-TALISMAN (OK) LTD.
KB: 55.176 m.

ESP Elect.

Cable.

COMPLETION DATE MAERCH 03, 2007


HOURS
6.00 Prepare and M/U TCP 4-1/2" TCP Gun 5 spf, 72° phase, Hyper Jet 4505 RDX charges P/N 447660
3-2 7/8" PJ 7" R-3 Packer, PJ, R-Npl, 20 Jts 2-7/8" Tbg, (fill Tbg w/ 1 bbl produce water) to 1536.5 m
13-3/8" Csg K-55,54.5#BTC
R-3 Set @ 54 m 2.50 R/U Schlumberger equipment & RIH GR-CCL to coralate of perforation depth.
1.50 Space out string (Added 8 m Pup Joint), set packer w/ 12,000 lbs compress.
9 5/8" Csg, 40 ppf, K-55
BTC, R-3, Set @ 845.0 m 1.50 Schlumberger RIH GR-CCL confirmation of perforation depth (on depth), R/D wireline equipment
1.00 N/D 7-1/16" BOP's, N/U X-Tree, Drop bar to fire TCP gun BRF interval 1529.5-1536.5 m - ok.
1.50 Observed well, the well flow air to follow liquid to swab tank.
0.50 Shut in well, installed chicksan fr/ X-Tree to Flow line
152 Jts. 2-7/8" Tbg.
12.50 Switched Production test to Block station Pt = 300 psi, Pf = 150 psi.

Marker PJ ( 3.12 m )
1-27/8" tbg

Note :
F-nipple
2 7/8" PJ
PR-3 pkr

2-2 7/8" tbg

CCSV
2-2 7/8" tbg 1. Get Stuck (slow pumping for ± 18.5 hrs) caused by DW-
Drop-bar Firing-head
Safety-spacer
transmission broken while drilling @1598m before free
Perf. BRF
Perf.gun 5 1/2"
1529.50 - 1536.50 m
Bull-nose
after 235 x jarring.
7" Saga BP ( 1580 m )
2. Partial loss ± 62 Bbl while circ for 7” cementing.
3. Flow without swabbing after perforation with TCP.
Perf TAF 1601-1605 M

7" Csg. 23ppf, K55, BTC,R-3


Set @ 1635 m
TD 1650 m.
WELL PERFORMANCE

AVERAGE PRODUCTION CUMMULATIVE


DAYS ON
MONTH OIL GAS WATER Liquids WATER
PROD. OIL (BBL) GAS (MSCF) DAYS
(BBL/D) (MSCF/D) (BBL/D) (BLPD) (BBL)

March 3, 2007 produce in BRF

Mar-07 29 844 364 47 891 24,475 10,570 1,352 29

Apr-07 30 890 417 58 948 51,186 23,071 3,090 59

May-07 29 847 454 54 901 75,738 36,229 4,658 88

TOTAL 88 860 412 53 913 75,738 36,229 4,658 88


TEST RESULT SUMMARY

Date : 24 May (18.00) – 30 May 2007 (18.00)


Flow time : 50 hrs.
Built up time : 92.42 hrs.
Gauge Depth : 1501 m (4924 ft)

Production Rate : 859 BOPD / 581 MCFD / 56 BWPD


Flowing Pressure : 1181 psi @1533m (mid perforation)
Flowing Gradient : 0.152 psi /ft. ~ Average (slug flow)
Static Pressure : 1659 psi @1533m (mid perforation)
Static Gradient : 0.1338 psi /ft
Liquid Gradient : 0.3159 psi /ft
Liquid Level : ± 900 m.

Productivity Index : 2.13 BPD/PSI


Q max : 2,015 BPD (1990 BOPD)
: 1,900 BOPD
Field : AIR SERDANG P e rfora tion Inte rva l : 5018.29 - 5041.257 FT RT
Well No. : ASDJ73 1529.5 - 1536.5 m

DATE : 26/5/2007 IPR CALCULATION DESIGN


DATA :
Mid Perf : 5030 RT Pr : 1658 psi Pumpset : - RT 00 m
SFL : 569 RT Pwf : 1181 psi Q : 913 bfpd
WFL : 1855 RT PI : 2.13 bfpd/psi Pwf : 1181 psi
Rate : 913 bfpd Qb : 124 bfpd WFL : 1855 RT 565 m
watercut : 6 % Qmax : 2016 bfpd FAP : -1855 ft -565 m
Pb : 1600 psi 1895.237 oil 860 bopd
oil 860 bopd Q<Qb
IPR curve
1800
IPR table
1600
Q (bfpd) Pwf (psi) WFL ('RT)
1400
0.0 1658.4 569.5
1200
428.1 1451.1 1127.0
Pwf (psi)

1000
807.4 1243.8 1684.5
800
1135.9 1036.5 2242.1
600
1413.6 829.2 2799.6
400
1640.5 621.9 3357.2
200
1816.5 414.6 3914.7
1941.8 207.3 4472.2 0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
2016.2 0.0 5029.8
Q (bfpd)
DEPTH (M)

FLOWING & STATIC PRESSURE

FLOWING PRESSURE ASDJ73 BRF

PRESS (PSI) STATIC PRESSURE ASDJ73 BRF


500 750 1,000 1,250 1,500 PRESS (PSI)
500
500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750
500

DEPTH PRESS GRAD


METER FT PSI PSI/FT
750
DEPTH PRESS GRAD - - 870 0
METER FT PSI PSI/FT KSC/10M 750 100 328 876 0.0180
- - 393 0.000 200 656 893 0.0527
100 328 550 0.479 1.105 300 984 901 0.0259
200 656 594 0.134 0.309 400 1,312 910 0.0253
DEPTH (M)

DEPTH (M)
1,000 300 984 630 0.108 0.249 500 1,641 918 0.0256
400 1,312 674 0.134 0.310 1,000
600 1,969 926 0.0250
500 1,641 742 0.208 0.481
750 2,461 938 0.0244
600 1,969 815 0.222 0.513
900 2,953 986 0.0971
750 2,461 892 0.156 0.360
1,050 3,445 1144 0.3214
1,250 900 2,953 974 0.166 0.384 1,250
1,050 3,445 1,060 0.176 0.405 1,200 3,937 1301 0.3186
1,200 3,937 1,090 0.061 0.140 1,350 4,429 1456 0.3147
1,350 4,429 1,119 0.060 0.138 1,400 4,593 1507 0.3121
1,400 4,593 1,156 0.226 0.520 1,450 4,757 1558 0.3127
1,500 1,450 4,757 1,156 0.000 0.000 1,500 1,480 4,856 1618 0.6004

SLUG FLOW ~ Pwf : 1181 PSI STATIC FLUID LEVEL ~ 900M


BU ANALYSIS

Model : Rectangular, 3 side infinite acting. 1 No flow


boundary, Vertical well, Partial perforation, Dual
porosity with Wellbore storage.

Radius of Investigation : 233 – 265 m.

Avg eff. Permeability : 276 mD Flow efficiency : 0.307


Kh : 8150 md.ft PI actual : 1.718 bbl/d/psi.
Skin (Total) : 26.2 PI Ideal : 5.301 bbl/d/psi.
Skin partial perforation : 0.581
Skin damage : 19.93
dP due to skin : 360 psi.
Storativity ratio : ± 0.3
Interporosity flow : 3.8.e-6
P* : 1700 psi @1603m
ASDJ-73X
ASDJ-73X (Main
(Main Target
Target BRF)
BRF)

7
Top Baturaja Fm.

-0
ok
Depth Structure Map

95
OW
C.i : 2 m C 15
mss 14

RADIUS OF INVESTIGATION 89o


k-4
8

OWC 1514
ASDJ-73X

mss
Air Serdang Field
TOP BRF
Depth Structure Map
C.I: 2 m

OWC 1514
mss

BRF DEPTH STRUCTURE MAP PORO > 22%

Ri ~ 770 ft
ASDJ73 48 HRS FLOW TEST BEFORE BU
24-26 MAY 2007

1200 80

1000 75

800 70

BWPD
600 65

400 60

200 55

0 50
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
HOURS
BOPD MCFD BLPD BWPD
SHUT-IN WHP MONITORING

SITP ASDJ73 84 HOURS


Typecurve
103
8
6

4
3

102
p / Derivative , psi

8
6
4
3
2

101
8
6
4
3
2
p / Derivativedata
Derivative data
1.0
3 4 5 6 7 89 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 2 3
1.0 101 102
t , h
STRIP CHART BU ASDJ73 BRF 24-30 MAY 2007
Diagnostic Analysis PBU ASDJ73 BRF
Typecurve t 92.05 h
104 p 1659.0 psi
7 r inv 918.985 ft
4
2
103
7 Storage 1
4 C 0.05 bbl/psi
2 CD 282.59
p / Derivative , psi

102
7
4 Radial 0
k 277.854 md
2
s' 25.555
101 p* 1678.1 psi
7 t 0.17 h
p 1456.4 psi
4
2
1.0
7
4 t 13.57 h
2 p 1642.0 psi
r inv 359.107 ft p / Derivativedata
10-1 Derivative data
8
5
2 3 4 5 6 78 2 3 4 5 6 78 2 3 4 5 6 78 2 3 4 5 6 78 2 3
10-2 10-1 1.0 101 102
Real Time , h
MODEL PARAMETER
AL PERFORATION MODEL BU ASDJ73 BRF
PRESSURE BUILDk =UP ANALYSIS
276.007 md
sd = 19.934
Plan View
(Not to scale)

PARTIAL PERFORATION MODEL BU ASDJ73 BRF


ARTIAL PERFORATION
No Flow
MODEL BU ASDJ73 BRF Typecurve
3
Yw = 183

k = 276.007 md
sd = 19.934 2 pi (syn) 1703.5 psi
Plan View p* 1700.5 psi
Infinite
(Not to scale)
Infinite 103 Cumoil 77.54 Mbbl
7
5
Yw = 183 Infinite

No Flow
3
2

p / Derivative , psi t 92.42 h


Infinite Infinite 102 p 1659.2 psi
7 r inv 769.165 ft
5
Infinite

3
2
kh 8149.80 md.ft
101 h 29.528 ft
Side View 7 hp 22.966 ft
(Not to scale) 5 k 276.007 md
kh/kv 0.100
No Flow Top of Reservoir 3
s' 26.210
2
htop = 3.281 Side
ft View sPP 0.581
sd 19.934 p / Derivativedata
h = 29.528 ft

(Not to scale)

No Flow Top of Reservoir


1.0 p skin 367.2 psi p / Derivativemodel
hp = 22.966 ft 7 Derivative data
PIActual 1.680 (bbl/d)/psi
htop = 3.281 ft Derivative model
5 PIIdeal 5.185 (bbl/d)/psi
h = 29.528 ft

hp = 22.966 ft 3
No Flow Bottom of Reservoir
2 3 4 5 678 2 3 4 5 6 78 2 3 4 5 6 78 2 3 4 5 6 78 2
10-2 10-1 1.0 101 102
No Flow Bottom of Reservoir
Real Time , h
Pressure History_(by well)
BRF (CTR) ASD
ASD-2 ASD-3 ASD-4 ASD-6 ASD-7 ASD-8 ASD-9 ASD-10 ASD-11
ASD-16 ASDJ-1 ASDJ-2 ASDJ-3 ASDJ-4 ASDJ-5 ASDJ-7 ASDJ-8 ASDJ-9
ASDJ-10 ASDJ-11 ASDJ-12 ASDJ-14 ASDJ-15 ASDJ-16 ASDJ-18 ASDJ-37 ASDJ-47
ASDJ-48 ASDJ-52 ASDJ-53 ASDJ-70 ASDJ-73

3,000

2,750

2,500

2,250

2,000
Pressure (PSI)

1,750

1,500

1,250

1,000

750

500

250

0
Jan-89

Jan-90

Jan-91

Jan-92

Jan-93

Jan-94

Jan-95

Jan-96

Jan-97

Jan-98

Jan-99

Jan-00

Jan-01

Jan-02

Jan-03

Jan-04

Jan-05

Jan-06

Jan-08
Jan-07
Date

PRESS @DATUM (-1528MSS) : 1765 PSI.


CONCLUSION

1. ASDJ73 was act as production well in infinite acting reservoir along


radius of investigation (233-265)m.
2. Barier may exist at one side of ASDJ73, probably at the western
directions.
3. ASDJ73 has reservoir pressure ± 1765 psi; almost the same with current
Central BRF Pressure (reservoir connect to existing depletion of BRF
ASD).
4. Dual porosity works at the reservoir with enough large of fissures
/fractures as storativity ratio ± 30%.
5. Reservoir has good average effective permeability (276 mD); Poor
vertical permeability (Kh/Kv normal ~ 0.1) and High Productivity Index
( 5.2 bbl/d/psi).
6. Positive skin (+) 26 reduced the PI till 1.7 bbl/d/psi. Almost caused by
wellbore damage. (Skin by perforation is only +0.5). Pressure loss due to
skin is ± 367 psi.
7. High production rate of ASDJ73 almost caused by gas driven as static
fluid level is only ± 900m (± 700 m liquid colum). Well produced under ±
480 psi drawdown (27%).
SPUD DATE :

DRILLING HISTORY.
HOLE (") : 8 1/2
TIME BREAKDOWN (00:00 - 24:00)
HRS O P E R A T I O N
5.50 DF f/ 1505 to 1531 m
0.50 Circ for cutting observation ( Top BRF @ 1530 m )
12.50 Cont'd DF to 1598 m, yoke of the propeller main-transmission of DW - broken ( DW no fungtion,
string live static / can't move or rotate )
14.50 Repair on DW-transmission while slow circulation
Estimate Top BRF @ 1530 mTop TAF-Shale @ 1583 mTop TAF-Sand @ 1596 m
4.00 Tried move the string, got stuck. Attemted for get free the stuck by jars-job w/ max OP 100,000 #
( after jaring-up on 155 times, the jars work in proferly / good working ). On 235 times jaring the
string got free. Circ for cleaning hole w/ working in string
8.00 Wiper-trip to 9 5/8" csg-shoe for hole condition after stuck ( tight-hole @ 1530 m w/ OP 30,000 #
when POOH and @ 1560 m tagged 15,000 # when RIH back )
15.50 Cont'd DF f/ 1598 to 1650 m;Circ hoie cleaning;Wipper-trip to 9 5/8" shoe
o
1.75 Circ, deviation survey = 5 1/2 ,swift hole by hi-vis mud, circ and drop 30 bbls hi-vis mud in bottom.
6.25 POOH bit # 4 to surface
5.00 Logging DLL-MSFL-GR-SP-LDL-CNL-BHC-Cal by Slb
7.00 M/U and RIH 8 1/2" bit to 1650 m.
o
2.00 Circ hole cleaning, spot 30 bbls hi-vis mud in bottom, re-survey for deviation = 5 1/2
9.00 POOH the 8 1/2" bit while L/D all drilling-string. Slack-off 5 1/4" kelly
14.50 Prepared & RIH 7" csg to 1648 m csg-shoe and FC @ 1635 m ( BC @ 508, 901 and1204 m )
1.50 Instaled cementing-head. Circulation, partial loss 0.5 - 0 bbls / mnt ( total mud loss = 62 bbls )
1.00 Load btm & top-plug in cementing-head. Held safety meeting. Flush line and test to 2000 psi
2.00 Pump 30 bbls spacer-fluid SP-01. Drop btm-plug, mix and pump 94.7 bbls cement-slurry of
15.2 ppg ( 214 sx cmnt G ). Drop top-plug, displace w/ 211 bbls fresh-water, bumping pressure
2000 psi. Hold for 5 mnts, bleed off pressure - fluid back 1.5 bbls, float in function. Job complete
9.00 L/D 5 1/4" kelly, swivel and floor accessories
Pick-up 13 5/8" BOPs, set 7" csg-hanger, rough cut 7" csg excess, N/D 13 5/8" BOPs. Finnal cut
7" csg, N/U section-B WH ( tbg-spool ). Test seal w/ 2500 psi - good. N/U x-tree
Rig released Jan 24, 2007
MUD PROPERTIES TOTAL MUD TANK VOLUME (bbls) = 340 MUD DUMPED (bbls) = 0
MUD TYPE TIME = 12.00 YP = 8 Tot. Sol. % = 6 Mf = 1.2
KCL PHPA DEPTH = 1650 PV = 6 MBT = - Cl = 28,000
FL temp = Gel = 3/7 Sand % = 0.2 Ca = 160
Samp. loc MW = 9.6 pH = 10 K+ = 30,000 RPM600/300 = 0
(in / out) Visc. = 35 FC = 1 PM = 0.6 RPM 200/ 100 = 0
WL = 8 HTHP = Pf = 0.6 RPM 6 / 3 = 0

Cont'd RIH 7" csg to 1648 m csg-shoe and FC @ 1635 m ( BC @ 508, 901 and1204 m )
Instaled cementing-head. Circulation, partial loss 0.5 - 0 bbls / mnt ( total mud loss = 62 bbls )
Load btm & top-plug in cementing-head. Held safety meeting. Flush line and test to 2000 psi
Pump 30 bbls spacer-fluid SP-01. Drop btm-plug, mix and pump 94.7 bbls cement-slurry of
15.2 ppg ( 214 sx cmnt G ). Drop top-plug, displace w/ 211 bbls fresh-water, bumping pressure
2000 psi. Hold for 5 mnts, bleed off pressure - fluid back 1.5 bbls, float in function. Job complete
L/D 5 1/4" kelly, swivel and floor accessories
Pick-up 13 5/8" BOPs, set 7" csg-hanger, rough cut 7" csg excess, N/D 13 5/8" BOPs. Finnal cut
7" csg, N/U section-B WH ( tbg-spool ). Test seal w/ 2500 psi - good. N/U x-tree
Rig released

You might also like