Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 128 views

    People vs. Godines (Adao)

    Uploaded by

    Mica Maurinne M. Adao
    1) Esther Ancajas testified that Godines and Moreno raped her after hacking her neighbor Milagros and robbing the couple's home. She identified the appellants in court. 2) The appellants claimed alibi, saying Godines was sick at Moreno's home that night. The trial court did not find the alibi credible given distances involved. 3) The Supreme Court upheld the conviction, finding the positive identification and physical evidence more credible than the alibi. It modified the penalty to life imprisonment for each appellant for two counts of rape.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    People vs. Godines (Adao)

    Uploaded by

    Mica Maurinne M. Adao
    128 views2 pages
    1) Esther Ancajas testified that Godines and Moreno raped her after hacking her neighbor Milagros and robbing the couple's home. She identified the appellants in court. 2) The appellants claimed alibi, saying Godines was sick at Moreno's home that night. The trial court did not find the alibi credible given distances involved. 3) The Supreme Court upheld the conviction, finding the positive identification and physical evidence more credible than the alibi. It modified the penalty to life imprisonment for each appellant for two counts of rape.

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1) Esther Ancajas testified that Godines and Moreno raped her after hacking her neighbor Milagros and robbing the couple's home. She identified the appellants in court. 2) The appellants claimed alibi, saying Godines was sick at Moreno's home that night. The trial court did not find the alibi credible given distances involved. 3) The Supreme Court upheld the conviction, finding the positive identification and physical evidence more credible than the alibi. It modified the penalty to life imprisonment for each appellant for two counts of rape.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    128 views2 pages

    People vs. Godines (Adao)

    Uploaded by

    Mica Maurinne M. Adao
    1) Esther Ancajas testified that Godines and Moreno raped her after hacking her neighbor Milagros and robbing the couple's home. She identified the appellants in court. 2) The appellants claimed alibi, saying Godines was sick at Moreno's home that night. The trial court did not find the alibi credible given distances involved. 3) The Supreme Court upheld the conviction, finding the positive identification and physical evidence more credible than the alibi. It modified the penalty to life imprisonment for each appellant for two counts of rape.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Mica Maurinne M. Adao ll 2007 19330 Criminal Law 2 ll Prof.

    Olaso-Coronel
    PEOPLE VS. GODINES G.R. No. 93410 May 7, 1991 Gancayco, J. Prosecution (Testimony of private complainant, Esther Ancajas) In the evening of March 17, 1988, she was sleeping in the house of one Alejandro Vilaksi at Sitio Sincamas, Sta. Cruz, San Pascual, Masbate. She was awakened by a commotion emanating from an adjacent room occupied by Vilaksi and his wife Milagros. She saw the defendants-appellants talking to the couple. Godines eventually hacked Milagros. Moreno stood by the window to serve as a lookout person. Godines got some money from the couple. Thereafter, the appellants prepared to leave the house. Ancajas tried to escape from the house with her small child. The appellants, however, saw her and grabbed her. The two men dragged Ancajas and the child out of the house and forcibly brought them to a nearby vacant lot with tall grasses, about 600 meters away from the Vilaksi residence. Both men were apparently armed; Godines had a pistol and Moreno had a knife. They threatened to kill Ancajas if she resisted their advances. Upon their arrival at the vacant lot, the appellants took turns in having carnal knowledge of Ancajas. Godines did it first. Ancajas tried to resist but the appellants simply overpowered her. After the appellants had finished satisfying their carnal desires, they threatened her anew with death because they suspected that Ancajas recognized them. Ancajas knew who they were but for fear of losing her life, she denied knowing any of them. Ancajas took refuge in the house of a neighbor, Elpidio Aballe. She fell unconscious there. She eventually regained her consciousness after which she narrated to Aballe the ordeal she went through. Ancajas later informed her parents and the authorities about the incident. Rizaliano Deliarte, the municipal health officer of San Pascual testified that it is possible that Ancajas had been raped. Defense In the afternoon of March 17, 1988, the two accused attended a religious service at the local Iglesia Ni Cristo church with a number of friends and relatives. They were together with a certain Felomino Moreno, the wife of Godines, and two children. When the religious service was over, they proceeded to the house of Felomino Moreno. They passed for a certain Generoso Umpad along the way. Before they reached their destination, Godines declared that he was feeling ill. Upon their arrival at the house of Felomino Moreno, everyone in the household attended to Godines. Godines and his wife spent the night in the said house.They went home at 7 o'clock the following morning. Danny Moreno stayed up to 10 o'clock in the evening. He slept in the house of Generoso Umpad from 11 o'clock p.m. The next day, Vicente Vilaksi went to see Godines at the latter's house in order to borrow a hammock. Godines then accompanied Vicente to the Vilaksi residence. There, he saw Ancajas and Elpidio Aballe. Later on in the afternoon of the same day, police authorities arrested the accused. Godines asserted that he could not have committed the crime because he had to stay in the house of Felomino Moreno to recuperate from his illness and that he was able to go home the next day. He also asserted that the house of Felomino Moreno is about two kilometers away from the house of Alejandro Vilaksi where the incident in question took place. Godines likewise intimated that he knew Esther Ancajas since they were small children and that they never had a misunderstanding Danny Moreno maintained that the house of Generoso Umpad is about three kilometers away from the house of Vilaksi. He also admitted that, like Danny Moreno, he knew Ancajas and that there was never any unpleasant relationship between them in the past. Both accused related that Ancajas knew the two of them as well. Trial Court A distance of a few kilometers from the scene of the crime is not a sufficient basis upon which to conclude that it was impossible for the accused to have committed the crime.

    Alibi as a defense which is easily concocted cannot prevail against positive identification by credible witnesses. The trial court also found the version of the prosecution credible in that no Filipino woman will publicly admit that she has been raped unless the same is true because her natural disposition is to protect her honor. Trial court held that the crime of forcible abduction is absorbed in the crime of rape if the main purpose of the accused is to rape the victim. Trial court found both appellants guilty of rape and sentenced them to suffer the penalty of reclusion perpetua and to pay P20,000.00 moral damages to the offended party. Motion for reconsideration was denied. Hence this petition

    Mica Maurinne M. Adao ll 2007 19330 Criminal Law 2 ll Prof. Olaso-Coronel


    ISSUE: WON the trial court erred in convicting Godines and Moreno for the crime of rape? HELD: NO. Conviction sustained. Judgment modified. The appellants insist that there are no conclusive medical findings that the complainant had indeed been raped. o This assertion is untenable. A medical examination is not an indispensable element in a prosecution for rape. 4 At any rate, the medical evidence discloses that the private complainant suffered abrasions on her body thereby confirming that she had been physically violated through the use of force. Private complainant categorically identified the authors of the crime. She had no motive to conjure up a serious charge against the appellants. The appellants themselves admit that before the incident in question took place, there was no unpleasant relationship between the accused on the one hand and the private complainant on the other The Court reiterates its oft-mentioned observation that it is very difficult to believe that a woman would be willing to undergo the expense, trouble, inconvenience and scandal of a public prosecution for rape, as well as an examination of the private parts of her anatomy, if her intention is not to bring her rapists to justice. The defense of alibi relied upon by the appellants does not preclude the possibility that they were present at the scene of the crime and at the time the same was committed. The distance between the alleged whereabouts of the appellants at the time of the commission of the crime and the scene of the crime itself may be easily negotiated by ordinary means. Alibi cannot prevail over positive identification Each of the appellants is guilty as principal of two (2) rapes, namely the rape he himself committed and the rape which his co-accused committed with his active and indispensable cooperation. In a conspiracy the act of one is the act of all. Appellants failed to object to the information filed and the evidence presented against them. Consequently the Court may convict them of as many offenses as has been charged and proven and may impose on them the penalty for the offenses committed. (Section 3 of Rule 120 of the Rules of Court)

    WHEREFORE, the Court hereby modifies the appealed judgment by finding each of the appellants guilty beyond reasonable doubt of two (2) rapes, so each of them is hereby imposed the penalty of life imprisonment for each rape and each to indemnify the offended party P50,000.00 with costs against defendants-appellants. SO ORDERED.

    You might also like