1.5t Comparison
1.5t Comparison
1.5t Comparison
Issue 7
June 2007
Our evaluations are usually of products supplied by the manufacturer. We expect these
products to be representative of those on the market but cannot guarantee this.
Prospective purchasers should satisfy themselves about any modifications that might have
been made after our evaluation.
The Centre for Evidence-based Purchasing (formerly the Device Evaluation Service)
transferred from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency to NHS PASA
on 1 September 2005. We are currently undergoing extensive redesign to help us provide
the information that purchasers want in the way they want it presented. Please visit our
website to keep updated.
E-mail: [email protected]
All evaluation reports published since 2002 are available in full colour to download from
our website: www.pasa.nhs.uk/cep
MagNET
Bagrit Centre
Department of Bioengineering
Imperial College London
Exhibition Road
London SW7 2AZ
Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism, or review,
as permitted under the Copyright, Designs & Patents Act, 1998, this publication may only be
reproduced, stored, or transmitted in any form or by any means with the prior permission, in
writing, of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office (HMSO).
Information on reproduction outside these terms can be found on the HMSO website
(www.hmso.gov.uk) or e-mail: [email protected]
Contents
Summary ....................................................................... 1
Purpose of this report ............................................... 1
Comparative specifications....................................... 1
Technical evaluation................................................. 1
Introduction................................................................... 2
Structure................................................................... 2
Evaluated systems ................................................... 3
Comparative specifications ......................................... 4
Magnet system ......................................................... 4
RF system ................................................................ 8
Gradient system ....................................................... 9
Sequence information............................................. 10
Computer system ................................................... 30
Radio-frequency (RF) coils..................................... 33
Parallel imaging product information ...................... 55
Technical evaluation................................................... 63
Introduction to evaluation ....................................... 63
Quadrature head coil evaluation............................. 65
In-built body coil evaluation .................................... 79
Multi-channel head coil evaluation.......................... 83
Multi-channel body coil evaluation.......................... 88
2D and 3D imaging speed ...................................... 93
Acoustic noise ........................................................ 97
List of safety information......................................... 99
Acknowledgements .................................................. 101
References ................................................................ 102
Appendix ................................................................... 103
Manufacturers’ comments .................................... 103
2D imaging speed: sequence parameters ............ 105
3D imaging speed: sequence parameters ............ 109
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Comparative specifications
The comparative specification is presented as a side-by-side summary
comparison of the specifications of each scanner and related equipment. It is
grouped into a series of sub-sections relating to different aspects of the
scanner, such as magnet, gradients, coils etc. A dedicated section on parallel
imaging coil has been included. The data have not been verified by CEP.
Technical evaluation
The technical evaluation section presents a detailed analysis of the head and
body coils available from each manufacturer. Parameters such as signal-to-
noise ratio, uniformity and resolution are included in the evaluation. Furthermore
dedicated sections on parallel imaging and acoustic noise have also been
incorporated. The data are published after consultation with manufacturers.
Their comments are included in the Appendix.
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
1
Introduction
Report 05047: 1.5 T MRI
systems - issue 5
There are other factors, outside the scope of this report, which should be taken
into account in purchasing decisions. For information on capital and operating
costs, maintenance, safety and peripheral equipment please contact MagNET.
This report does not attempt to explain MRI. Readers who are unfamiliar with
this modality may have difficulty understanding the results presented in this
report. In this case, advice should be sought from a suitably qualified MRI
specialist.
Structure
The main body of the report is divided into two sections, the first presents
system specifications, system information and safety evaluation, and the
second gives technical evaluation results. The results contained in this report
are published after consultation with the manufacturer. Their comments are
included in the Appendix.
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
2
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Evaluated systems
The MRI systems included in this report are listed in Table 1 and shown in Figure 1.
Comparative specifications
3
Siemens MAGNETOM Symphony Siemens MAGNETOM Avanto Toshiba Excelart Vantage Toshiba Excelart Vantage with Atlas
I-class
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Comparative specifications
Specification data were correct at the time of going to press (subsequent updates or newer versions from the
manufacturers are not accounted for). The data provided have not been verified by CEP. An entry of “Not supplied” in
the tables indicates that the manufacturer(s) did not supply CEP with the required information in time for publication of
this report.
Magnet system
Comparative specifications
Table 2. Magnet specification
GE Signa GE Signa Philips Philips Siemens Siemens Avanto Toshiba
HDx HDe Intera Achieva Symphony I-class & T-class Excelart
Vantage
4
Comparative specifications
Depth (with covers) (z) 195 195 167 167 160 160 149.5
cm
Width (with covers) (x) 221 221 188 188 198 230 215
cm
Height (with covers) (y) 241 241 240 240 233 230 241
5
cm
Radial (x,y) 0.5 mT 2.48 2.48 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5 3.0
Fringe Field m
Axial (z) 0.5 mT Fringe 4.0 4.0 3.8 3.8 4.0 4.0 5.0
Field m
Minimum installed area <33 <22 30 30 30 ≤ 30 28.8
m2*
Minimum ceiling height 250 250 265 265 240 235 240 (scan room)
cm* 280 (equipment
room)
*To include 0.5 mT fringe field
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Comparative specifications
Active 3 gradient, 18 3 gradient, 18 Standard: 3 Standard: 3 Standard: 3 linear Standard: 3 linear Standard: 3 linear
shimming superconducting superconducting first order first order terms via gradient terms via gradient
coils coils Dynamic Dynamic offsets with 20 offsets with 20
Optional: 5 high
Twin: further 5 FOV with FOV with coils* coils*
order
Higher order user-defined user-defined Optional: 5 Optional: 5
6
resistive Shims shim volume shim volume additional non- additional non-
linear 2nd order linear 2nd order
terms with 32 coils* terms with 32 coils*
*Can be used for patient-specific shimming
Comparative specifications
105 (Twin)
Patient aperture at
maximum:
Width cm 106 106 154 154 120 Not supplied 65.5
7
RF system
Table 7. RF system specification
GE Signa GE Signa Philips Philips Siemens Siemens Avanto Toshiba
HDx HDe Intera Achieva Symphony I-class & T-class Excelart Vantage
Name/type/ HDx HDe Synergy FREE Advanced Whole- TIM TIM TIM AGV XGV ZGV ATLAS
version WAVE Array Body [32×8] [76×18] [76×32]
Array
Number of 8 (std) 4 (std) 4 8 (std) 4 8 8 18 32 4 4, 8 8 16
independent RF 16 (opt) 8 (opt) 6 16 (opt)
receiver channels 32 (opt) 32 (opt)
Comparative specifications
(standard/
optional)
Bandwidth of each 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
independent RF
receiver channel
8
MHz
Number of analog- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
to-digital converters
for each
independent RF
channel
Sampling 20 20 1 80* 10 10 10 10 10 Not supplied
frequency of each
analog-to-digital
converter MHz
*Direct digital sampling with no intermediate frequency demodulation
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Gradient system
Table 8. Gradient system specification (x, y, z as defined in Figure 2)
GE Signa GE Signa Philips Philips Siemens Siemens Avanto Toshiba
HDx HDe Intera Achieva Symphony I-class & T-class Excelart Vantage
Comparative specifications
x (horizontal) 33 50 23 33 33 33 33/66 30 33 40 30 30 33
y (vertical) 33 50 23 33 33 33 33/66 30 33 40 30 30 33
z (along the bore axis) 33 50 23 33 33 33 33/66 30 33 45 30 30 33
Slew rate mT/m/ms
9
x (horizontal) 120 150 50 80 100 180 180/90 125 125 200 50 130 200
y (vertical) 120 150 50 80 100 180 180/90 125 125 200 50 130 200
z (along the bore axis) 120 150 50 80 100 180 180/90 125 125 200 50 130 200
Duty cycle at max amplitude % 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Amplitude at 100% duty cycle 33 23/ 50 23 33 33 33 33/66 30 33 40/40/45 30 30 33
mT/m
Z
X
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Sequence information
Quoted values should correspond to imaging with no interpolation, no asymmetric echo, no partial Fourier, no parallel
imaging, no fat-sat, no rectangular matrix, no rectangular field-of-view
Comparative specifications
Minimum TR ms 10 7 11 13.3 11.6 11.4 11.4 11 7.4 6.8 Not 9.0 9.0
Spin echo* supplied
Minimum TR ms 2.7‡ 2.6‡ 2.8‡ 2.25 1.07 0.83 0.83 1.8 1.8 1.5 Not 5.1 5.1
2D gradient echo* supplied
10
Minimum TR ms 1,2 1,2 1,7 2.25 1.07 0.83 0.83 1.8 1.8 1.5 Not 3.5 3.5
3D gradient echo* supplied
Minimum echo 2.5 2.5 3.3 3.15 1.93 1.74 1.74 2.9 2.8 2.6 Not 2.6 2.6
spacing ms supplied
Turbo spin echo*
Minimum echo 0.460 0.412 0.712 0.53 0.49 0.393 0.393 0.79 0.48 0.41 1.2 0.5 0.4
spacing ms
Echo planar
imaging†
Minimum TE ms Not Not Not 66.5 63.4 62.7 44.3 66 58 53 105 80 70
Single-shot supplied supplied supplied
diffusion imaging
with b-value of
1000 mm2/s†
* For 256x256 matrix with no interpolation
†
For 128x128 matrix with no interpolation
‡ Maximum EPI factor =12
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Comparative specifications
Minimum 2D slice 0.3 0.9 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.5
thickness mm 0.4 for Atlas ZGV
Minimum 3D slice 0.1 0.2 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
11
thickness mm
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Comparative specifications
capabilities to SmartPrep.
Post-Processing Functionality: Interactive Vascular Imaging (IVI): Produces angiographic and maximum intensity projections (MIPs) in
multiple scan planes, Multi-Projection Volume Reconstruction (MPVR): generation of volumetric images for MR angiography, Multi-Planar
Reformation (MPR): evaluation of anatomy in off-axis planes, Batch reformations, Interactive Vascular Imaging (IVI), 3D surface rendering,
Brainwave Fusion: Enables fusion of Diffusion Tensor tractography data with functional activation areas into a single data set, FuncTool
12
Performance: advanced MRI post-processing: ADC maps, eADC maps, Correlation coefficients for mapping of motor strip and visual/
auditory stimuli, NEI (Negative Enhancement Integral), MTE (Mean Time To Enhance), Positive enhancement integral, Signal enhancement
ratio, Maximum slope increase, Maximum difference function, Difference function, Optional single-voxel, 2D and 3D CSI post-processing.
Standard pulse sequence imaging options: ASSET/GEM, Blood suppression, Cardiac gating/triggering, Cardiac compensation, Classic,
DE prepared, Extended dynamic range, Flow compensation, Full echo train, IR prepared, Magnetization transfer, MART, Multi-station, Multi-
phase and DynaPlan, No phase wrap, Real time, Respiratory compensation, Respiratory gating/triggering, Sequential, SmartPrep, Spectral
spatial RF, Square pixel, T2 prep, Tailored RF, VERSE, ZIP 1024, ZIP 512, Slice Zip x 2 (Z2) and Zip x 4 (Z4)
GE Multi-Purpose Functionality: Fast Spin Echo (FSE), Fast Recovery Fast Spin Echo (FRFSE) and FRFSE-XL, Single Shot Fast Spin Echo
Signa (SSFSE) and Enhanced MR Cholangio-Pancreatography (MRCP), Gradient Echo (GRE), Dual Echo Gradient Echo, Spectral Inversion at
HDe Lipids (SPECIAL), i-Drive Pro Real-time interactive imaging, HD LAVA (Liver Acquisition with Volume Acceleration), T1 and T2 Fluid-
Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR), IR-prepared FGRE, Black Blood Double and Triple Inversion Recovery, ECG-Gated FGRE and
FSPGR FastCine, 2D and 3D Phase Contrast (2D PC, 3D PC): Determines flow velocities and directional properties of blood flow in
vessels, SmartPrep: Improves contrast-enhanced MRA by ensuring trigger upon contrast arrival, SmartStep: Enhances peripheral vascular
run-offs, Adds table-stepping capabilities to SmartPrep
Post-Processing Functionality: Interactive Vascular Imaging (IVI): Produces angiographic and maximum intensity projections (MIPs) in
multiple scan planes, Multi-Projection Volume Reconstruction (MPVR): generation of volumetric images for MR angiography, Multi-Planar
Reformation (MPR): evaluation of anatomy in off-axis planes, , FuncTool Performance: advanced MRI post-processing: ADC maps, eADC
maps, Correlation coefficients for mapping of motor strip and visual/auditory stimuli, NEI (Negative Enhancement Integral), MTE (Mean
Time To Enhance), Positive enhancement integral, Signal enhancement ratio, Maximum slope increase, Maximum difference function,
Difference function, Optional single-voxel, 2D and 3D CSI post-processing
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Comparative specifications
multi-phase with Balanced FFE with retrospective gating; 3D k-space shutter 25% reduction in scan times. ProSet (provides
water- or fat-selective excitation images), SPAIR (fat saturation technique to address RF field inhomogeneities). BLISS (bilateral
breast imaging in the sagittal view with SENSE), TRACS, time-resolved MRA, SENSE parallel imaging for all sequences
(SENSE factor 2)
Philips Achieva ScanTools package (standard on each Achieva system): Spin Echo (SE); Fast Field Echo (FFE) including steady state
13
(Balanced-FFE) and spoiling techniques; Turbo Field Echo (TFE) including pre-pulses and flip angle sweep; Turbo Spin Echo
(TSE) with single and dual echoes, DRIVE (Driven Equilibrium), Single Shot (SS) TSE; Echo Planar Imaging (EPI) Multi Shot
(MS) and Single Shot (SS) for FFE and SE imaging compatible with pre-pulses; Inversion Recovery (IR, STIR, FLAIR)
compatible with SE, TSE and EPI imaging methods; Time of Flight (ToF) with FFE and TFE imaging techniques, including RF
Spoiling and MTC, gating acquisitions and dual gated inflow, 3D acquisition with TONE and multi-chunk (MOTSA); Contrast
Enhanced (CE) with CENTRA with ultra-short short TE, FFE and TFE, CENTRA (Contrast Enhanced MR Angiography with 3D
profiles); Phase Contrast (PC) 2D and 3D with variable VENC values, retrospectively gated 2D multi-phase; Quantitative flow in
3 directions; CLEAR (Constant LEvel AppeaRance); Cardiac gated breath-hold TFE: bright blood or dark blood; Single-slice
multi-phase with Balanced FFE with retrospective gating; 3D k-space shutter 25% reduction in scan times. ProSet (provides
water- or fat-selective excitation images), SPAIR (fat saturation technique to address RF field inhomogeneities). BLISS (bilateral
breast imaging in the sagittal view with SENSE), TRACS, time-resolved MRA, SENSE parallel imaging for all sequences
(SENSE factor 2)
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Comparative specifications
isotropic resolution. 2D/3D TurboIR (TrueIR, STIR, DarkFluid T1 and T2). 2D/3D HASTE (Half-Fourier Acquisition with Single Shot Turbo
Spin Echo). 2D/3D HASTE IR for fat or fluid suppression. 2D/3D Single Shot TSE for heavy T2 weighting. 2D/3D Time-of-Flight (ToF)
Angiography, single and multi slab. 2D/3D ToF, triggered and segmented
Body suite: Free breathing 2D PACE applications with 2D/3D HASTE (Restore) and 2D/3D TSE (Restore). Single-shot HASTE. Fat
suppression protocols with Quick FatSat, STIR, HASTE, SPAIR and FLASH in-phase/opposed-phase protocols and multi-echo TSE.
14
Dynamic 3D VIBE protocols. Colonography bright lumen with T2-weighted TrueFISP and dark lumen with T1-weighted VIBE. Dynamic
volume examinations with 3D VIBE, dynaVIBE - Inline motion correction of multi-phase VIBE data sets.
Onco suite: STIR TSE and FLASH in-phase/ opposed-phase protocols. Colorized Wash-in, Washout, Time-To-Peak, Positive-
Enhancement-Integral, MIPtime, and combination maps with Inline Technology or for offline calculation. MeanCurve for display and
analysis of the temporal behaviour in selected regions of interest, including the capability of using additional datasets as a guide for
defining regions of interest. Precision filter for 3D spatial accuracy e.g. for radiotherapy planning.
Ortho suite: 2D TSE protocols for PD, T1, and T2-weighted contrast. 3D MEDIC, 3D TrueFISP protocols with water excitation for T2-
weighted imaging. 3D VIBE protocols for MR arthrography (knee, shoulder and hip). 3D MEDIC, 3D TrueFISP, 3D VIBE protocols with
water excitation. 3D TSE with variable flip angle. Whole-spine single-step or multi-step protocols. Fat suppression in off-centre positions.
Dynamic TMJ and ilio-sacral joint protocol. Susceptibility-insensitive protocols
Paediatric suite: Head, spine and cardiac protocols divided according to different age groups.
Breast Suite: Customized protocols (e.g. with fat saturation or water/silicone excitation) with multiplanar visualization and iPAT. VIEWS
(Volume Imaging with Enhanced Water Signal) is included as standard within this suite for 3D isotropic breast MRI.
Scientific Suite: Phoenix, Camtasia and the facility to offer trial applications licenses, as standard with the system.
Siemens Tim Workflow Suite: Inline and offline composing of images and planning tools for planning, reading and processing with focus on
Avanto extended Field of View and whole body exams. Automatic real time calculation of trace-weighted images and ADC maps
T class syngo Chorus MR: Departmental integration of MR scanner and Siemens RIS, features protocol planning, support of automated follow
up studies and billing. Protocols from one scanner can be distributed to other scanners connected to the RIS.
syngo TimCT: Enables continuous table move scanning. syngo TimCT FastView is based on a gradient echo sequence a complete
extended Field of View in isotropic resolution with continuous table move.
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Comparative specifications
15
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Comparative specifications
directional properties of blood flow in vessels.
Cardiac: ECG-Gated FGRE and FSPGR FastCine (functional acquisitions of the heart, Full R-R coverage), Fiesta Cine and FatSat Fiesta
(Fast Imaging Employing Steady-State Acquisition: contrast enhancement between the myocardium and the blood pool), Cardiac Tagging
(applies spatial SAT pulses over the anatomy of interest to obtain cardiac images sensitive to tissue motion), Black Blood Double and
Triple Inversion Recovery, Navigators for 3D Coronary Imaging (Software designed for use in conjunction with 3D IR-prepared FGRE or
16
3D FatSat FIESTA for coronary imaging. Enables the patient to breathe freely throughout the acquisition while eliminating respiratory
motion from the resultant images), IR-Prepared FGRE Sequence (consists of an IR-prepared FGRE sequence that allows the suppression
and enhancement of various tissues within the myocardium (available in 2D and 3D)), ReportCARD (cardiac reporting software provides a
way to review and analyse cardiac MR images and generate comprehensive reports for referring physicians. Reports tailored specifically
to pediatrics and CSF flow), i-Drive Pro Plus (expands i-Drive Pro functionality, permits geometric scan plane changes on the fly).
GE Angiography: SmartPrep (Improves contrast-enhanced MRA by ensuring trigger upon contrast arrival), SmartStep (Enhances peripheral
Signa vascular run-offs, Adds table stepping capabilities to SmartPrep), Interactive Vascular Imaging (IVI) (produces angiographic and maximum
HDe intensity projections (MIPs) in multiple scan planes), TRICKS: Time Resolved Imaging of Contrast KineticS technology (uses temporal
sampling to accelerate the temporal resolution of 3D dynamic imaging. Now integrated with Elliptical-Centric data sampling), Fluoro-
Triggered MRA (enables the user to manually trigger each angiographic acquisition with the desired level of vessel enhancement) , 2D
and 3D Phase Contrast (2D PC, 3D PC): determines flow velocities and directional properties of blood flow in vessels.
Cardiac: ECG-Gated FGRE and FSPGR FastCine (functional acquisitions of the heart, Full R-R coverage), FIESTA Cine Cardiac
Imaging: (Fast Imaging Employing Steady-State Acquisition: contrast enhancement between the myocardium and the blood pool), Cardiac
Tagging (applies spatial SAT pulses over the anatomy of interest to obtain cardiac images sensitive to tissue motion), Black Blood Double
and Triple Inversion Recovery, Coronary Artery Imaging (FIESTA 3D FatSat allows acquisition of breath-held 3D datasets of the coronary
arteries), Navigators for 3D Coronary Imaging (Software designed for use in conjunction with 3D IR-prepared FGRE or 3D FatSat FIESTA
for coronary imaging. Enables the patient to breathe freely throughout the acquisition while eliminating respiratory motion from the
resultant images), IR-Prepared FGRE Sequence (consists of an IR-prepared FGRE sequence that allows the suppression and
enhancement of various tissues within the myocardium (available in 2D and 3D))
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Comparative specifications
hold or free breathing examinations with full heart coverage. MotionTrak provides real-time interactive motion correction for free
breathing protocols), Cardiac tagging (provides the visualization of myocardial wall motion, allowing visualization of both contractual
and torsional motions throughout the cardiac cycle), Coronary artery imaging (enables fast, free breathing coronary imaging).
Philips Angiography: BolusTrak (provides 2D-real time fluoroscopic display of contrast bolus arrival for synchronization of contrast-enhanced
Achieva angio acquisitions), MobiTrak (provides automatic table movement between successive angiographic image acquisitions for
17
visualization of the abdominal aorta and peripheral vasculature), MobiFlex (enhances the MobiTrak peripheral vascular angiography
technique by providing the flexibility to individually specify contrast timing and image resolution for each station. MobiFlex enables use
in combination with SENSE and BolusTrak), MobiView (automatically presents multi-station data as one image), Qflow analysis
(provides quantitative flow results from Regions of Interest (ROI) in velocity encoded Phase Contrast (PC) datasets).
Cardiac: Cardiac performance package (includes VCG triggering capabilities, multi-slice multi-phase imaging and quantitative flow
analysis), Cardiac perfusion package (enables multi-slice first-pass perfusion studies with full heart coverage), Viability (tissue viability
characteristics are revealed via late hyper enhancement of the tissue signal in T1-weighted images. Package provides single breath-
hold or free breathing examinations with full heart coverage. MotionTrak provides real-time interactive motion correction for free
breathing protocols), Cardiac tagging (provides the visualization of myocardial wall motion, allowing visualization of both contractual
and torsional motions throughout the cardiac cycle), Coronary artery imaging (enables fast, free breathing coronary imaging).
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Comparative specifications
resolved 3D MR angiographic imaging with high spatial and temporal resolution. Flow Quantification also available.
syngo TimCT Angiography (optional for T-class only): Continuous table move 3D angiographic exams of the peripheral vessels. 3D
gradient echo sequence with strong T1 weighting and continuous table movement during imaging with table velocity up to 50 mm/s.
Cardiac Suite: Standard package included in Tim Application Suite. Various breath-hold techniques (dark-blood TSE, HASTE, cine
techniques: FLASH). Acquisition of a stack of shortaxis slices (standard segmented FLASH, or advanced segmented TrueFISP). Use of
18
the Inline ECG for graphical ECG triggering set-up. Prospective gating with cine sequences (TrueFISP, FLASH). iPAT. Turbo FLASH
Advanced cardiac package: Dark-blood sequences. Ventricular Function and Wall Motion. Dynamic CINE TrueFISP imaging of
cardiac function with prospective and retrospective ECG triggering, with or without breath-hold technique. Cine imaging with echo
sharing. Triggered retrogated cine imaging with arrhythmia rejection for automatic adjustment of the number of phases to the heart rate.
Real-time cine TrueFISP imaging without need for ECG triggering or breath-hold commands. Real-time radial imaging. TrueFISP iPAT
and Half Fourier techniques. Protocols for paediatrics, plaque imaging and stress imaging. Dedicated sequences for coronary imaging
and angiography providing free breathing navigator (1D PACE) and breath-hold techniques (2D and 3D Flash and TrueFISP, requires
PMU Wireless Physio Control option). Interactive Real-time Imaging also available
Toshiba Angiography: MRA R6 package - Visual Prep to trigger scan for contrast enhanced MRA, Moving bed for Peripheral Angiography,
Excelart Centric order K-space filling, 2D TOF (time of flight) MRA or 2D FFE, 3D TOF MRA or 3D FFE, MRV (magnetic resonance
Vantage venography). WET (water excitation technique) – removes unwanted fat signal, improves visualisation of vessels. STAMD (Sequential
Target MIP Display) allows the observation of the relationship between inflowing artery and outflowing vein (e.g. heart). DRKS R6
(different rate k-space sampling). Apply to FFE 3D dynamic imaging. Data is collected around the centre of k-space with higher
temporal resolution than in other sections, reducing scan time.
SuperFASE R6 package - contains FBI (Fresh Blood Imaging) – peripheral angiography without the need for contrast.
Cardiac: Cardiac R6 package Includes Cardiac function analysis software – cardiac output, ejection fraction, volume curves,
percentage wall thickness. FASE BB (black blood imaging). Cine imaging (use FFE technique plus breath hold, prospective and
retrospective gating). Real time motion correction (estimates and corrects change of heart position due to respiratory motion) – use with
3D FFE, for imaging heart, coronary arteries.
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Comparative specifications
Philips Intera Perfusion imaging package (features hemodynamic maps, Negative Index (NI), Time-to-peak (TTP), Time-of-arrival (T0), Mean
Transit Time (MTT) and flow index (index)) using dynamic multi-slice T2* weighted sequences.
Philips Achieva Perfusion imaging package (features hemodynamic maps, Negative Index (NI), Time-to-peak (TTP), Time-of-arrival (T0), Mean
Transit Time (MTT) and flow index (index)) using dynamic multi-slice T2* weighted sequences.
19
Toshiba Excelart EPI R6 package – allows diffusion, Perfusion and Functional MR imaging.
Vantage Perfusion images using “ASL” allows perfusion studies to be performed without the need for contrast.
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Comparative specifications
Intera automatic calculation of isotropic Diffusion Weighted images and online calculation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) maps. Flexible
choice of diffusion sensitivity (b-value), up to 16 b-values in one scan, modulus averaging, selective averaging for increased SNR and
higher b-values, three diffusion directions per scan - P (Phase), M (Measurement) and S (Slice), automatic online calculation of isotropic
diffusion-weighted images, online calculation of ADC maps. Can be combined with SENSE.
High-Resolution Diffusion Package: enables high-quality high-resolution diffusion imaging of the brain and brain stem. High Resolution
20
Diffusion uses motion-corrected diffusion-weighted multi-shot sequences. Multi-shot EPI, TSE and GRASE-based diffusion imaging
sequences, PhaseTrak provides real-time, interactive phase correction for motion-insensitive images, high-resolution multi-shot TSE and
GRASE diffusion imaging, can be combined with SENSE.
Philips Diffusion Imaging Performance Package: includes Single-Shot EPI Diffusion imaging sequences for motion free imaging, plus the
Achieva automatic calculation of isotropic Diffusion Weighted images and online calculation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) maps. Flexible
choice of diffusion sensitivity (b-value), up to 16 b-values in one scan, modulus averaging, selective averaging for increased SNR and
higher b-values, three diffusion directions per scan - P (Phase), M (Measurement) and S (Slice), automatic online calculation of isotropic
diffusion-weighted images, online calculation of ADC maps. Can be combined with SENSE.
High-Resolution Diffusion Package: enables high-quality high-resolution diffusion imaging of the brain and brain stem. High Resolution
Diffusion uses motion-corrected diffusion-weighted multi-shot sequences. Multi-shot EPI, TSE and GRASE-based diffusion imaging
sequences, PhaseTrak provides real-time, interactive phase correction for motion-insensitive images, high-resolution multi-shot TSE and
GRASE diffusion imaging, can be combined with SENSE.
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Comparative specifications
Excelart ADC images produced.
Vantage
21
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Comparative specifications
32), online calculation of Fractional Anisotropy maps. Can be combined with SENSE.scan)
Philips Achieva Diffusion Tensor Imaging Package (DTI): extends Diffusion Weighted Imaging to measure the directional dependence of the
diffusion coefficient in tissue. Enables visualization of white matter tracts in Fractional Anisotropy (FA) maps. Multi-directional DTI
imaging sequences using the full range of available diffusion acquisition methods, selectable number of diffusion directions (up to
32), online calculation of Fractional Anisotropy maps. Can be combined with SENSE.scan)
22
Siemens MDDW (Multiple-Direction Diffusion Weighting) allows the acquisition of diffusion weighted data sets with diffusion weighting in
Symphony up to 12 directions. These data sets may be used for the evaluation of diffusion tensors (evaluation software not included).
Siemens Avanto Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Diffusion Tensor Evaluation and Diffusion Tensor Tractography for advanced DTI analysis :
I-class & Diffusion Tensor Imaging uses a Single Shot EPI sequence for measuring diffusion-weighted data sets with diffusion weighting in
T-class up to 256 directions. Based on these data sets, the diffusion tensor and parameter cards derived from it are calculated
automatically and in real-time (fractional anisotropy). The DTI Evaluation package is a dedicated application card for advanced
post-processing and visualization of Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) data. The DTI Tractography package allows the visualization
of multiple white matter tracts of the human brain and is optimized to support the presurgical planning and to allow for neuro
physiological research with respect to connectivity and white matter pathology.
Toshiba Excelart DTI R6 package – visualisation of white matter fibres running in a specific direction in the brain – based on diffusion anisotropy.
Vantage
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Comparative specifications
BrainWave Hardware Lite Supplemental Paradigm Delivery: BrainWave Hardware Lite is a supplemental paradigm delivery
system for functional MRI, developed for use with BrainWave Real-Time (RT) image acquisition software. It includes a dedicated
computer workstation, equipment rack and penetration panel waveguide insert, Cedrus patient response pads, and related cabling
and connectors. It is designed to deliver visual and auditory stimuli. The computer includes preset paradigms and software tools to
generate custom protocols. The visual and auditory output can be coupled to fMRI delivery systems purchased separately from other
23
Comparative specifications
parameter maps to visualize and quantify areas of neural activity, real-time image registration during the study, color-coded image
maps, including cross correlation maps (CC) and Z-score, creation of composite reference images by placing derived images on top of
high-resolution anatomical MR images, numerical results of functional MR data, color overlay of areas of activation on top of anatomical
reference image.
Siemens BOLD Imaging, 3D PACE and BOLD 3D Evaluation : Single Shot EPI for BOLD Imaging, 3D PACE, and a processing and visualization
24
Symphony package for BOLD fMRI, providing a full set of features for clinical fMRI, as well as advanced features for more research oriented
applications.
Siemens Inline BOLD (Blood Oxygen Level Dependent) Imaging: Automatic real-time calculation of z-score (t-test) maps with Inline technology,
Avanto for variable paradigms. Compatible to single-shot EPI with high susceptibility contrast for fast multi-slice imaging; ART (Advanced
I-class & Retrospective Technique) for fully automatic 3D retrospective motion correction, for 6 degrees of freedom (3 translations, 3 rotations);
T-class Mosaic images for storage and transfer of large data sets; 3D spatial filtering; Overlay of Inline calculated t-test results on EPI images
3D PACE (Prospective Acquisition CorrEction) Syngo Prospective motion detection and correction in the volume to eliminate motion
artefacts during BOLD measurements; Fully automatic 3D prospective motion correction during data acquisition, for 6 degrees of freedom
(3 translations and 3 rotations); Motion correction covering the complete 3D volume; reduces motion-related artefacts in t-test
calculations; increases signal changes in the activated neuronal volume; increases functional MRI (fMRI) sensitivity and specificity. In
contrast to a retrospective motion correction that corrects previously acquired data, the unique 3D PACE tracks the head of the patient,
correcting for motion in real time during the acquisition.
BOLD 3D Evaluation: Processing and visualization package for BOLD fMRI. It provides a full set of features for clinical fMRI, as well as
advanced features for more research oriented applications such as, for example, overlay of functional information on 3D dataset during
image acquisition
Toshiba EPI R6 package – allows diffusion, perfusion and Functional MR imaging. BOLD (Blood Oxygen Level Dependent) technique.
Excelart Post processing - Alignment (two- dimensional, motion correction), Filtering (Thresholding, filters) and Analysis. Uses a T2* weighted
Vantage image acquired with the FE type EPI technique as the original image.
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Comparative specifications
PROSE Prostate Spectroscopy: 3D CSI with VSS (Very Selective Saturation) to suppress surrounding fat tissues.
BREASE Breast Spectroscopy: single-voxel breast spectroscopy, allows the detection of choline in the resultant spectrum.
Multi-Nuclear Spectroscopy : allows non-proton spectroscopy including 31P, 13C, 19F, 23Na, 7Li, 129Xe or 3He. All T/R switches
and MNS coils must be purchased separately.
FuncTool Performance: Enables single-voxel, 2D and 3D CSI post-processing
Sage 7 Software: allows processing, display, manipulation, analysis, management and printing of in-vivo spectroscopy data via
25
graphical interface using filters, transformations, correction algorithms, segmentations and quantifications to obtain information from
your spectroscopic data. Also electronic output format (BMP, EPS and GIF to JPEG, PICT and TIF).
GE Signa HDe Not applicable
Philips Intera Spectroscopy: 1H Spectro package includes single voxel, multi-voxel and multi-slice proton spectroscopy acquisition methods. The
package includes SpectroView data processing and display.
Philips Achieva Spectroscopy: 1H Spectro package includes single voxel, multi-voxel and multi-slice proton spectroscopy acquisition methods. The
package includes SpectroView data processing and display.
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Comparative specifications
View (FoV) encoding. Short TEs available (30 ms for SE, 20 ms for STEAM). Automized shimming of the higher order shimming
channels for optimal homogeneity of larger CSI volumes. Weighted acquisition, leading to a reduced examination time compared to
full k-space coverage while keeping SNR and spatial resolution. Outer Volume/ Spectral Suppression. Protocols for prostate
spectroscopy.
GRACE Syngo: Integrated software package including sequences and protocols for proton spectroscopy, optimized for breast
26
studies.
Multinuclear Support and Multinuclear Spectroscopy Packages available for studying nuclei other than 1H.
Toshiba Spectroscopy package – single voxel acquisition
Excelart Advanced Proton Spectroscopy Package – multi-voxel acquisition.
Vantage
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Comparative specifications
imaging in the cervical spine.
3D COSMIC: 3D imaging technique is designed specifically for imaging in the C-spine. It provides a unique, fluid-weighted contrast to
improve visualization of the cervical nerve roots and the intervertebral disks.
LAVA-XV Imaging: a selfcalibrated acquisition approach that allows simultaneous acceleration in both the phase encoding and the
slice select direction for better slice coverage and higher spatial and temporal resolution. Suitable for single breath-hold imaging of the
abdomen and pelvis.
27
VIBRANT-XV Breast Imaging: allows acceleration in both the phase encoding as well as the slice select direction, coupled with a fat-
saturation technique and automatic subtraction of the images for good contrast and high lesion conspicuity.
CadStream Breast Analysis: includes hardware and postprocessing software that facilitates analysis and management of breast
image data. CADstream includes SureLoc reports needle position in real time and displays images and needle position in the patient’s
orientation, for MR-guided interventions.
CartiGram: provides high-resolution maps of the T2 values in cartilage and other tissues. The imaging results are color coded to
highlight those structures with increased water-content yielding elevated T2 values.
GE Signa PROPELLER: acquisition technique for transverse imaging with low sensitivity to motion artifacts. Available in T2 FSE , T2 FLAIR and
HDe Diffusion-weighted EPI.
3D FIESTA: 3D FIESTA (Fast Imaging Employing Steady-State Acquisition) delivers short repetition times (TR) between RF pulses,
delivering high T2 contrast. Suitable for rapid, high-resolution imaging in areas such as the Internal Auditory Canals (IACs).
3D FIESTA-C: Phase-cycled FIESTA technique reducing sensitivity to changes in magnetic susceptibility that may be encountered
when imaging in the posterior fossa and near air-tissue boundaries. Suitable for the internal Auditory Canals (IACs) as well as for T2
imaging in the cervical spine.
VIBRANT (Volume Imaging for Breast AssessmeNT): Sagittal VIBRANT scans both breasts simultaneously (in the time it would
normally take to do one). Axial VIBRANT scans without in-plane data interpolation (zero-filling) for enhanced data integrity. Both are
multi-phase techniques that use dual shimming for optimum image quality and provide the choice of subtraction for enhanced
background suppression. ASSET compatible. Fat-suppression technique developed specifically for breast imaging.
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Comparative specifications
imaging package (enables rapid, automated whole-body imaging with an effective field of view of over 2 meters (7 feet).
MobiScan combines MobiTrak, MobiFlex, and MobiView imaging and viewing techniques with ExamCards to deliver multi-station
head-to-toe coverage)
Others: Real-time interactive imaging (provides the imaging techniques and user interface elements for fluoroscopic MR
imaging.)
28
Siemens Advanced 3D Package, TGSE (Turbo Gradient Spin Echo), AutoAlign syngo, syngo Security, MPPS syngo, IDEA (Integrated
Symphony Development Environment for Applications), BLADE, AutoAlign Syngo, SWI, Composing Syngo.
Siemens Avanto Tim Whole Body Suite, iPAT Extensions (integrated Parallel Acquisition Techniques), CISS and DESS, TGSE (Turbo Gradient
I-class & Spin Echo), AutoAlign Head, AutoAlign Spine, syngo Security, MPPS syngo, IDEA (Integrated Development Environment for
T-class Applications), SWI, BLADE, ParametricMap Syngo, Composing Syngo, Inline Composing Syngo, Tim Planning Suite, TWIST.
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Comparative specifications
SPEED - To be able to view vessels running in different directions on a single image e.g. pulmonary, portal, systemic vessels. A
3D sequence.
ECG PREP - Scan determines the Optimal delay time for FBI of the heart. FBI - To visualise fresh blood ejected from the heart
without contrast. Uses FASE 3D. Vascular Imaging with ECG gating or peripheral pulse gating.
FSE/ FASE T2 PLUS - Reduces scanning time for T2 weighted scans e.g MRCP. Like “DRIVE”.
29
FSE 3D REAL –IR - 3D FSE T1 weighted, small FOV, high resolution volume scans. E.g. imaging temporal lobes for TLE.
INTERMITTENT BREATHOLD - Use with FSE 3D with SPEED technique. Breath hold scan, will have less misalignment.
FASE BB - Is a black blood pre-pulse, suppresses intra-cardiac blood signal. Chest scan with breath hold is fast – decreases flow
artefact. Used as a localiser scan also in the chest.
FASE DIFFUSION - A motion probing Gradient is attached to a FASE sequence which produces Diffusion weighted images with
less distortion.
MULTI-SHOT FASE 2D - Decreases scan time, decreases image blurring. Use with intermittent breath hold high resolution BB
scan.
FASE FLOW COMPENSATION - Decreases artefact for single shot images. Don’t have to set phase encode to flow direction for
FBI.
TRUE SSFP - For Visualisation of abdominal blood vessels. For depicting tissues and blood vessels with relatively long T2
during breath holding.
TIME-SLIP - When used with FBI for Non contrast enhanced lung MRA the pulmonary arteries are selectively visualised. Can
use in non-contrast-enhanced MRA with FASE or TRUE SSFP sequences (particularly artery/vein separation in the lung fields.)
FLOW SPOILED FBI - Enables Non-contrast enhanced artery/vein separation images, MRA of the lower limbs without the use of
contrast.
Extended table travel option (for Atlas systems): increases FOV to 205cm to enable whole body imaging studies,
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Computer system
Table 18. Main computer system – architecture
GE Signa GE Signa Philips Philips Siemens Siemens Avanto Toshiba
HDx HDe Intera Achieva Symphony I-class & T-class Excelart Vantage
Operating system Linux Linux Windows XP Windows XP Windows XP Windows XP Pro MS Windows XP
Pro syngo syngo speaking Pro
speaking
Processor
Type Dual AMD Dual AMD Dual Pentium Dual Pentium Dual Pentium Dual Pentium IV Xeon Dual
Comparative specifications
Opteron 250 Opteron IV Xeon IV Xeon IV Xeon Xeon
Speed 2 × 2.4 GHz 2 × 2.4 GHz > 2 × 3.2 GHz > 2 × 3.2 GHz 2 × 3.60 GHz 2 × 3.60 GHz 2 × 3.0 GHz
Word length bit 64 32 32 64 32 32 64
30
Comparative specifications
RAM 16 GB 4 GB 4 GB 4 GB 1 GB (standard) ≥ 8 GB 1GB
2 GB (Whole
Body Array
interface)
31
Hard disk storage 4 × 73 GB Not supplied Not supplied Not supplied 4 × 36 GB 4 × 36 GB 1.9 TB for Atlas
Number of 2700 1350 ≥ 256 ≥ 256 355 > 1200 820
256×256 images* 4000 (max) for
reconstructed Atlas
/sec
Transfer rate 1.0 Gbps 1.0 Gbps No transfer No transfer No transfer time No transfer time 1000 MB/s
from host Ethernet image Ethernet image time common time common common bus common bus
transfer transfer bus bus
* Reconstruction time for a true 256×256 matrix with no interpolation, no asymmetric echo, no partial Fourier, no parallel imaging, no fat-sat, no rectangular
matrix, no rectangular field-of-view.
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Comparative specifications
Bit depth bit 24 24 3×8 3×8 16 16 32
32
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
• # output channels: number of independent RF receiver channels the RF coil plugs into.
• # QD/CP elements: number of elements used for quadrature (QD)/circularly polarised (CP) detection.
• # LP elements: number of elements used for linearly polarised (LP) detection.
Manufacturers have been asked to adopt the above definitions in the description of their coils.
Comparative specifications
Table 21. In-built body coil
GE Signa GE Signa Philips Philips Siemens Siemens Avanto Toshiba
HDx HDe Intera Achieva Symphony I-class & T-class Excelart Vantage
Name Body Body Quadrature Quadrature CP Integrated CP Integrated Body Whole body coil
33
Comparative specifications
channels Dual Mode : 8 CP
Triple Mode : 12
# QD/CP 2 2 12 12 2 elements 12 elements, combined to: 4
elements (birdcage (birdcage (= 1 CP) CP Mode: 4 CP elements
34
Comparative specifications
channels Dual Mode: 4
Triple Mode: 4
# QD/CP Not applicable Not applicable 12 12 3 (= 1 CP + 1 4 elements, combined to: 12
elements LP) CP Mode: 2 CP
Dual &Triple Mode: 4
35
elements
# LP elements 18 18 3 3 (see above) (see above) Not applicable
*R=receive, T/R=transmit/receive, PA=phased array, Q=quadrature, L=linear, w=width, h=height, d=depth, l=length, dia=diameter, circ=circumference
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Comparative specifications
cm (h×w×l) (h×w×l) (h×w×l) (l ×w × h)
# output 8 4/8 - 8 or 16 In total: CP Mode : 6 CP 4
channels 5 (4 CP + 1) Dual Mode : 12 (8 CP
+ 4)
Triple Mode : 16
36
Comparative specifications
# output 8 4/8 5 5 6 CP CP Mode: 8 CP (up to 4 CP 6
channels (up to 4 CP simultaneously in one FOV)
simultaneously Dual Mode: 16 CP (up to 8
in one FOV) CP simultaneously in one
FOV)
37
Type* R PA R PA R PA R PA R PA Q R PA Q/L R PA Q
Dimensions 53.5 x 71 53.5 x 71 45 × 30 45 × 30 (see individual (see individual coils) 54 × 47 × 5
cm (ant) (ant) (l × w) (l × w) coils) (l ×w × h)
53.5 x 77 53.5 x 77
Comparative specifications
(post) (post)
Triple Mode : 12
# QD/CP Not Not Not Not 8 (= 4 CP) 12 elements, combined to: 16 elements
elements applicable applicable applicable applicable 4 CP elements in CP Mode,
8 CP elements in Dual
Mode,
12 elements in Triple Mode
# LP 8/12 8 4 4 Not applicable (see above) Not applicable
elements
*R=receive, T/R=transmit/receive, PA=phased array, Q=quadrature, L=linear, w=width, h=height, d=depth, l=length, dia=diameter, circ=circumference
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Comparative specifications
Dimensions - 40 x 30 20 × 39 20 × 39 (see individual (see individual coils) 54 × 47 × 5 per coil
cm (2 parts) (l × w) (l × w) coils) (l ×w × h)
# output - 4 5 5 8 CP CP Mode: 8 CP 8 or 16
39
Comparative specifications
(132cm max circ)
# output - 16 8 Up to 32 channels 4
channels
# QD/CP - Not 12 (2x6), combined Up to 76 seamlessly integrated 4
40
Comparative specifications
cm /21 x 19 (2 parts) (w × l) (w × l) (w×l×h) (l ×w × h)
# output 8 8/4 5 5 (see individual coils) 8 CP 4 or 8
channels
# QD/CP Not - Not applicable Not (see individual coils) 16 elements 16
41
Comparative specifications
per coil
# output 8/16 - 12 12 8 CP 4 16 per coil
channels
# QD/CP Not supplied - Not applicable Not applicable 16 elements Not applicable 16 per coil
42
elements (8 CP)
# LP elements 32 - Not applicable Not applicable See above Not applicable Not applicable
Name No other coil No other coil Phased Array Phased Array Phased Array No other coil No other coil
Carotids Coil Carotids Coil Carotids Coil
(Machnet BV) (Machnet BV) (Machnet BV)
Type* - - R PA R PA R PA - -
Dimensions - - 105 x 60 105 x 60 105 x 60 - -
cm (l x w) (l x w) (l x w)
# output - - 4 4 4 - -
channels
# QD/CP - - Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable - -
elements
# LP elements - - Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable - -
*R=receive, T/R=transmit/receive, PA=phased array, Q=quadrature, L=linear, w=width, h=height, d=depth, l=length, dia=diameter, circ=circumference
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Comparative specifications
# output 8 8/4 4 4 2 CP 4 Not supplied
channels
# QD/CP Not supplied Not supplied Not applicable Not applicable 4 (=2CP) Not applicable Not supplied
elements
43
Comparative specifications
channels
# QD/CP Not applicable Not applicable 1 1 7
elements
# LP 4 4 Not applicable Not applicable Not supplied
elements
44
Name No other coil No other coil No other coil SENSE Breast No other coil No other coil No other coil
(compatible with
biopsy device)
Type* - - - R Q PA - - -
Dimensions - - - Not supplied - - -
cm
# output - - - 7 - - -
channels
# QD/CP - - - Not applicable - - -
elements
# LP - - - 7 - - -
elements
*R=receive, T/R=transmit/receive, PA=phased array, Q=quadrature, L=linear, w=width, h=height, d=depth, l=length, dia=diameter, circ=circumference
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Comparative specifications
cm (w×d×h)
19.5 dia
# output 1 1 Not supplied Not supplied 1 1 4
channels
# QD/CP 1 1 Not supplied Not supplied 1 1 4
45
elements
# LP 2 2 Not supplied Not supplied Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
elements
Name HD Knee Array HD Knee Array No other coil SENSE knee No other coil 8-channel knee Quadrature
coil coil Knee/ Foot coil
Type* T/R PA T/R PA - R Q PA - R PA Q RQ
Dimensions 40 × 42 ×31 40 × 42 × 31 - Not supplied - 40 × 42 × 31 45×60×38
cm (l × w × h) (w×d×h)
# output 8 8 - 8 - 8 4
channels
# QD/CP Not applicable Not applicable - Not applicable - Not applicable 4
elements
# LP 9 9 - 8 - 8 Not applicable
elements
*R=receive, T/R=transmit/receive, PA=phased array, Q=quadrature, L=linear, w=width, h=height, d=depth, l=length, dia=diameter, circ=circumference
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Comparative specifications
cm
# output 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
channels
# QD/CP Not supplied Not supplied Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
elements
46
# LP 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
elements
*R=receive, T/R=transmit/receive, PA=phased array, Q=quadrature, L=linear, w=width, h=height, d=depth, l=length, dia=diameter, circ=circumference
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Comparative specifications
# output 8 8/4 4 4 - 8 -
channels
# QD/CP Not supplied Not supplied Not Not applicable - Not applicable -
elements applicable
47
# LP 8 8/4 4 4 - 8 -
elements
*R=receive, T/R=transmit/receive, PA=phased array, Q=quadrature, L=linear, w=width, h=height, d=depth, l=length, dia=diameter, circ=circumference
†Synergy SENSE S can also be used for wrist imaging (see table for general purpose coils)
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Comparative specifications
# output 3 3 4 4 4 4 4
channels
# QD/CP Not supplied Not supplied Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
elements
48
# LP 3 3 4 4 4 4 4
elements
Other extremity coils
Name See general See general See general See general No other coil 8 ch Foot Ankle See general purpose
purpose coils, purpose coils, purpose coils, purpose coils, Coil coils, Table 33
Table 33 Table 33 Table 33 Table 33
Type - - - - - R PA L -
Dimensions - - - - - 53 × 33 × 28 -
cm (l × h × w)
# output - - - - - 8 -
channels
# QD/CP - - - - - Not applicable -
elements
# LP - - - - - 8 8
elements
*R=receive, T/R=transmit/receive, PA=phased array, Q=quadrature, L=linear, w=width, h=height, d=depth, l=length, dia=diameter, circ=circumference
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Comparative specifications
up to 8 elements Body+Spine Array) Body+Spine Matrix)
# QD/CP Not supplied - Not supplied Not supplied Not applicable Not applicable -
elements
# LP elements 1 - Not supplied Not supplied 1 1 -
49
+ Combines with HD Body array or 4ch Body array for anatomy coverage.
† Combine with CP Body Array and CP Spine Array for max. image homogeneity
Comparative specifications
Type* RL RL RL RL RQ RQ RL
Dimensions 7.5/12.5 7.5/12.5 27/11/8 27/11/8 17 × 36 (small) Small:17 × 36 7, 10,15 or 20
cm (dia) (dia) (l × w) (l × w) (dia)
21 × 52 (large) Large:21 × 52
50
(l × w) (l × w)
# output 2 2 1 1 1 CP 1 CP Not supplied
channels
# QD/CP Not supplied Not supplied Not supplied Not supplied 2 (=1CP) 2 (=1CP) Not supplied
elements
# LP 2 2 Not supplied Not supplied See above See above Not supplied
elements
*R=receive, T/R=transmit/receive, PA=phased array, Q=quadrature, L=linear, w=width, h=height, d=depth, l=length, dia=diameter, circ=circumference
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Comparative specifications
Type* RL RL RL RL RL RL RL
Dimensions 21×45 Not supplied 16×13.5 16×13.5 4 (small) (dia) 4 (small) (dia) 39×24×10
cm (l × w) (dia × l) (dia × l) 19 (large) (dia) 19 (large) (dia)
51
Comparative specifications
Dimensions cm - - 8 (dia) 8 (dia) - Not supplied 18 × 36 (w × l)
# output - - 2 2 - 4 Not supplied
channels
# QD/CP - - Not applicable Not applicable - Not applicable Not supplied
52
elements
# LP elements - - 2 2 - 4 Not supplied
Name No other coil No other coil Synergy SENSE Synergy SENSE No other coil 4 channel Flex Coil No other coil
Flex M Flex L small
Applications - - Shoulder, Wrist, Hip, Head, - Hip, Knee, -
small joints Shoulder, knee, Shoulder, elbow,
ankle, elbow, ankle, wrist
paediatric
Type* - - R Q PA R Q PA - R Q PA -
Dimensions cm - - 14×17 20 (dia) - Not supplied -
# output - - 2 2 - 4 -
channels
# QD/CP - - Not applicable Not applicable - Not applicable -
elements
# LP elements - - 2 2 - 4 -
*R=receive, T/R=transmit/receive, PA=phased array, Q=quadrature, L=linear, w=width, h=height, d=depth, l=length, dia=diameter, circ=circumference
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Comparative specifications
Type* - - R Q PA R Q PA - - -
Dimensions - - 20 (dia) 14x17 - - -
cm
# output - - 2 2 - - -
53
channels
# QD/CP - - Not applicable Not applicable - - -
elements
# LP elements - - 2 2 - - -
*R=receive, T/R=transmit/receive, PA=phased array, Q=quadrature, L=linear, w=width, h=height, d=depth, l=length, dia=diameter, circ=circumference
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Comparative specifications
(w × d × h)
# output channels 16 - - - - - 16
# QD/CP elements Not supplied - - - - - 14
54
Comparative specifications
based uses auto- (GeneRalised (GeneRalised
reconstruction calibration signal Autocalibrating Autocalibrating
method (ACS) lines Partially Parallel Partially Parallel
Acquisition) Acquisition)
55
Table 36: Parallel imaging factors for head coils with parallel imaging capability
GE Signa GE Signa Philips Philips Siemens Siemens Avanto Toshiba
HDx HDe Intera Achieva Symphony I-class & T-class Excelart Vantage
RF system HDx HDe FREEWAVE FREEWAVE Advance Whole Tim Tim Tim Vantage ATLAS
d Array Body [32x8] [76x18] [76x32]
Array
Number of 8 16 32 4 8 4 6 8 16 32 8 8 18 32 4,8 8,16
independent
RF receiver
channels
Comparative specifications
Name HD Brain HD Brain SENSE HEAD SENSE HEAD CP Head Array Head Matrix Head Atlas Head
Array Array SPEEDER SPEEDER
Parallel 2 2 2 - 2 Max4 Max6 Max 8 Max 8 HF*: 1/2 ‡ HF: 1/2 ‡ HF*:2/4‡ HF*:2/4‡ HF*: 2/4‡ 2 8
imaging factors AP*: 1 AP: 1 AP*: 3/3 AP*: 3/3 AP*: 3/3
LR*: 1 LR: 1 LR*: 3/3 LR*: 3/3 LR*: 3/3
56
Table 37: Parallel imaging factors for neck/neurovascular coils with parallel imaging capability
GE Signa GE Signa Philips Philips Siemens Siemens Avanto Toshiba
HDx HDe Intera Achieva Symphony I-class & T-class Excelart Vantage
RF system HDx HDe FREEWAVE FREEWAVE Advance Whole Tim Tim Tim Vantage ATLAS
d Array Body [32x8] [76x18] [76x32]
Array
Number of 8 16 32 4 8 4 6 8 16 4 8 8 18 32 4,8 8,16
independent
RF receiver
channels
Comparative specifications
Name HD NV HD NV Array Synergy Synergy CP Neck array Neck Matrix Head ATLAS
Array Head/neck PA Head/neck PA SPEEDER with SPEEDER
NV attachment Head/Neck
Parallel 2 2 2 - 2 Max 3 Max 3 Max 3 Max 3 HF: 1/2 HF: 1/4 HF: 1/4 HF: 1/4 HF: 1/4 2 Up to 16
imaging
57
AP: 2/2 AP: 2/2 AP: 2/2 AP: 2/2 AP: 2/2
factors
LR: 1 LR: 1 LR:2/2-3 LR:2/2-3 LR: 2/2-3
max: 8 max:8-12 max:8-12
Name Head, HD No other coil 8 or 16 CP Head Array,CP Head Matrix and Neck No other coil No other
Neck and Neurovascular channel Neck Array and CP Matrix (Matrix technology) coil
Spine Array SENSE Spine Array (IPA
(HNS) Neurovascular technology)
Array
Parallel - 2 2 2 - - Max 8 Max 16 HF:4 HF:1/4 HF: 3 HF: 3 HF: 3 - -
imaging AP:2 AP:1 AP: 2 AP: 2 AP: 2
factors
LR:2-3 LR:1 LR: 2-3 LR: 2-3 LR: 2-3
max:8-12 max: 6 max: 9 max: 9
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Table 38: Parallel imaging factors for spine coils with parallel imaging capability
GE Signa GE Signa Philips Philips Siemens Siemens Avanto Toshiba
HDx HDe Intera Achieva Symphony I-class & T-class Excelart Vantage
RF system HDx HDe FREEWA FREEWAVE Advanced Whole Tim Tim Tim Vantage ATLAS
VE Array Body [32x8] [76x18] [76x32]
Array
Number of 8 16 32 4 8 4 6 8 16 4 8 8 18 32 4,8 8,16
independent
RF receiver
channels
Comparative specifications
Name HD NV HD SENSE SENSE CP Spine Array Spine Matrix QD CTL ATLAS
Array/ Head, Neurovascular Spine Spine Array spine array
Neck and Array /
Spine HD NV Array
(HNS) Array
58
Parallel 2 2 2 2 2 Max Max Max Max HF: 2 HF: 4 HF: 4 HF: 4 HF: 4 2 Up to 16
imaging 2 2 2 2 AP: 1/2 AP: 1/2 AP: 1/2-3 AP:1/2-3 AP: 1/2-3
factors LR: 1 LR: 1 LR: 3 LR: 3 LR: 3
max: 9 max: 12 max: 12
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Table 39: Parallel imaging factors for body coils with parallel imaging capability
GE Signa GE Signa Philips Philips Siemens Siemens Avanto Toshiba
HDx HDe Intera Achieva Symphony I-class & T-class Excelart Vantage
RF system HDx HDe FREEWAVE FREEWAVE Advanced Whole Tim Tim Tim Vantage ATLAS
Array Body [32x8] [76x18] [76x32]
Array
Number of 8 16 32 4 8 4 6 8 16 4 8 8 18 32 4,8 8,16
independent
RF receiver
channels
Comparative specifications
Name HD Body HD Body No such coil SENSE XL CP Body Array + CP Body Matrix + Spine Matrix QD Torso Atlas
Array Array Torso Spine Array Duo SPEEDER
SPEEDER Body
Parallel 3.5 3.5 3.5 - 3.5 - Max Max HF: 2 HF: 2 HF: 2 HF: 2 HF: 2 4 Up to 16
imaging 8 16 AP: 2 AP: 2 AP: 2-3 AP: 2-3 AP: 2-3
59
Table 40: Parallel imaging factors for extremity coils with parallel imaging capability (1)
GE Signa GE Signa Philips Philips Siemens Siemens Avanto Toshiba
HDx HDe Intera Achieva Symphony I-class & T-class Excelart Vantage
RF system HDx HDe FREEWAVE FREEWAVE Advanced Whole Body Tim Tim Tim Vantage ATLAS
Array Array [32x8] [76x18] [76x32]
Number of 8 16 32 4 8 4 6 8 16 4 8 8 18 32 4,8 8,16
independent
RF receiver
channels
Knee coils
Comparative specifications
Name HD Knee HD Knee No such coil SENSE knee No such coil 8-channel knee coil No such coils
Array Array
Parallel 2 2 2 2 2 - Max Max - HF: 1 HF: 1 HF: 1 -
imaging 8 8 AP: 4 AP: 4 AP: 4
60
Table 40: Parallel imaging factors for extremity coils with parallel imaging capability (2)
GE Signa GE Signa Philips Philips Siemens Siemens Avanto Toshiba
HDx HDe Intera Achieva Symphony I-class & T-class Excelart Vantage
RF system HDx HDe FREEWAVE FREEWAVE Advanced Whole Body Tim Tim Tim Vantage ATLAS
Array Array [32x8] [76x18] [76x32]
Number of 8 16 32 4 8 4 6 8 16 4 8 8 18 32 4,8 8,16
independent
RF receiver
channels
Shoulder coils
Comparative specifications
Name No such No such SENSE SENSE Shoulder Array Shoulder Array (large+small) No such coil
coil coil Shoulder Shoulder (large+small)
Parallel - - Max Max Max Max HF: 2 HF: 2 HF: 2 HF: 2 HF: 2 -
imaging 4 4 4 4 AP: 2 AP: 2 AP: 2 AP: 2 AP: 2
61
Table 41: Parallel imaging factors for breast coils with parallel imaging capability
GE Signa GE Signa Philips Philips Siemens Siemens Avanto Toshiba
HDx HDe Intera Achieva Symphony I-class & T-class Excelart Vantage
RF system HDx HDe FREEWAVE FREEWAVE Advanced Whole Body Tim Tim Tim Vantage ATLAS
Array Array [32x8] [76x18] [76x32]
Number of 8 16 32 4 8 4 6 8 16 4 8 8 18 32 4,8 8,16
independent
RF receiver
channels
Name HD Breast 4ch Breast SENSE SENSE CP Breast Array Breast Matrix Breast SPEEDER
Array Array / HD Breast Breast
Breast Array
Parallel 3.5 3.5 3.5 2 3.5 Max Max Max Max HF: 1 HF: 1 HF: 1 HF: 1 HF: 1 Max 4 Max 4
imaging 4 4 5 5 AP: 1 AP: 1 AP: 1 AP: 1 AP: 1
factors LR: 2 LR: 2 LR: 2 LR: 2 LR: 2
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Table 42: Parallel imaging factors for other/general purpose coils with parallel imaging capability
GE Signa GE Signa Philips Philips Siemens Siemens Avanto Toshiba
HDx HDe Intera Achieva Symphony I-class & T-class Excelart Vantage
RF system HDx HDe FREEWAVE FREEWAVE Advanced Whole Body Tim Tim Tim Vantage ATLAS
Array Array [32x8] [76x18] [76x32]
Number of 8 16 32 4 8 4 6 8 16 4 8 8 18 32 4,8 8,16
independent
RF receiver
channels
Name 3”/5” GP 3”/5” GP SENSE Flex SENSE Flex No other coil 4-channel Flex coils, large and No other coils
Comparative specifications
coils coils L/M/S L/M/S small
Parallel 2 2 2 2 2 Max 2 - HF: 2 HF: 2 HF: 2 -
imaging AP: 1 AP: 1 AP: 1
factors LR: 2 LR: 2 LR: 2
62
Name No other coil No other No other coil No other coil No other coil 8 channel Foot ankle coil -
coil
Parallel - - - - - HF: 2 HF: 2 HF: 2 -
imaging AP: 2 AP: 2 AP: 2
factors LR: 2 LR: 2 LR: 2
Technical evaluation
Introduction to evaluation
The technical performance of the 1.5 T systems included in this evaluation is
provided in this section of the report. Table 43 provides information on these
systems and Table 44 shows our standard imaging protocol.
(imaging speed)
Notes -Since this evaluation, the The Master GRAPPA GRAPPA
gradient amplifier has been gradient system reconstruction reconstruction
changed to improve is replaced by applied in applied in
performance. the Pulsar parallel parallel
-Gradient systems are now system: results imaging. imaging.
called HDx and HDx option should be
Twin. similar or
slightly
improved
63
Technical evaluation
64
Technical evaluation
Analysis
The SNR was calculated using a subtraction method; two identical scans were
acquired and a difference image obtained. The mean signal was measured from
five regions of interest within the test object area in one of the acquired images
and the noise was measured from the standard deviation from these regions in
the difference image (Lerski 1998). The values obtained for SNR were
normalised for voxel size (including measured slice width), scan time, sampling
bandwidth and Q-factor.
Interpretation of results
The image SNR value obtained on a system is influenced by system and
sequence factors. Example system factors are the main magnetic field strength
B0 and the design of the radiofrequency receive and transmit systems. Example
sequence factors are voxel size, scan time and sampling bandwidth.
Table 45. Experimental conditions for quadrature head coil SNR test
GE-ES GE-TWS PH-INT PH-ACH SI-SYM SI-AVA
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Temperature
24 25 22 23 21 20
°C
Bandwidth
11.90 11.90 28.1 23.26 16.64 16.64
kHz
MAGFF- MAGFF- MAGFF- MAGFF- MAGFF-
Test object TO1A_S
Loaded Loaded Loaded Loaded Loaded
Q factor 1.04 1.12 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.00
65
Technical evaluation
PH-INT
SI-SYM
GE-ES
PH-ACH
SI-AVA
GE-TWS
66
Technical evaluation
Analysis
The average of several intensity profiles is calculated in all three directions. The
fractional uniformity is calculated for each direction from the fraction of the
profile that lies within 10% of the mean value of a central ROI (Lerski 1998).
The optimum value is unity, indicating 100% of the signal is considered uniform
over the measured distance.
Interpretation of results
Results describe unfiltered images. Filtering is likely to improve image
uniformity usually at the expense of image resolution. The optimum value of
fractional uniformity is 1.00. Fractional uniformity results in the x, y and z
directions are presented in Table 47. Graph 2 shows the fractional uniformity
results averaged over the three directions.
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
67
Technical evaluation
GE-TWS
SI-AVA
GE-ES
SI-SYM
PH-ACH
PH-INT
68
Technical evaluation
Analysis
The resolution is evaluated by calculating the frequency at the 50% point on the
modulation transfer function (MTF) plot (Lerski 1998). This frequency is
converted into pixel resolution.
Interpretation of results
Measurements of MTF are considered to be within experimental error if they are
within ±10% of the nominal pixel size. The resolution measurements are
presented in Table 48. The measured resolution should be equal to the nominal
pixel dimension of 0.98mm. Graph 3 shows a comparison of the average pixel
dimension.
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
69
Technical evaluation
GE-ES
GE-TWS
SI-AVA
PH-ACH
SI-SYM
PH-INT
70
Technical evaluation
Analysis
The geometric linearity results are obtained from a set of horizontal and vertical
distance measurements in the acquired images. These measurements are
converted from pixels to millimetres and compared to the actual separation
distance (Lerski 1998).
Interpretation of results
The optimum value for the geometric linearity is 120 mm and for its error it is
zero. However, results are considered to be within experimental error if they are
within ±1 mm. Table 49 shows the linearity measurements for each gradient
direction. Graph 4 compares the mean linearity errors for the systems.
71
Technical evaluation
PH-INT
PH-ACH
GE-ES
SI-SYM
SI-AVA
GE-TWS
*The optimum value is 0 ± 1 mm. Systems are ranked in order of the absolute deviation from optimum.
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
72
Technical evaluation
Analysis
The coefficient of variation (CV) indicates the degree of variation of the distance
measurements from one another. The coefficient of variation is defined as
(Lerski 1998):
standard deviation
CV = x 100%
mean
Interpretation of results
The optimum value for the coefficient of variation is zero, hence the lower the
coefficient of variation, the lower the in-plane distortion and the better the
performance of the system. Table 50 shows the distortion results for the three
gradient directions. Graph 5 shows a comparison of the mean geometric
distortion for the three gradient directions.
73
Technical evaluation
SI-SYM
SI-AVA
PH-ACH
PH-INT
GE-TWS
GE-ES
74
Technical evaluation
Analysis
The slice width is measured from the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the
slice intensity profile (Lerski 1998).
Interpretation of results
The slice profiles should have minimum side lobes, no ringing, and no central
drop-out. The measured slice widths for the three imaging planes presented in
Table 51 should lie within 10% of the nominal slice width. Graph 6 and Graph 7
show comparisons of the mean 3 mm and 5 mm slice width measurements.
75
Technical evaluation
GE-TWS *
PH-ACH *
SI-SYM *
PH-INT
SI-AVA
GE-ES
* The system has the optimum measured error value of 0.0 mm.
† The optimum value is 0 ± 0.3 mm. Systems are ranked in order of the absolute deviation from optimum.
PH-ACH *
SI-SYM
GE-TWS
PH-INT
SI-AVA
GE-ES
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
* The system has the optimum measured error value of 0.0 mm.
†
The optimum value is 0 ± 0.5 mm. Systems are ranked in order of the absolute deviation from optimum.
76
Technical evaluation
Analysis
Ghosting is calculated as the ratio of the maximum image ghost, minus the
background noise, to the image signal (Lerski 1998).
Interpretation of results
The optimum value for ghosting is zero, hence the lower the ghosting, the better
the performance of the system. Table 52 presents the ghosting results. Graph 8
and Graph 9 present the results for 1 and 2 NSA respectively.
NSA = 1
NSA = 2
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
77
Technical evaluation
SI-AVA
SI-SYM
PH-INT
GE-ES
PH-ACH
GE-TWS
PH-INT
SI-AVA
PH-ACH
SI-SYM
GE-ES
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
GE-TWS
78
Technical evaluation
Analysis
The SNR was calculated using a subtraction method; two identical scans were
acquired and a difference image obtained. The mean signal was measured from
five regions of interest within the test object area in one of the acquired images
and the noise was measured from the standard deviation from these regions in
the difference image (Lerski 1998). The values obtained for SNR were
normalised for voxel size (including measured slice width), scan time, sampling
bandwidth and coil loading.
Interpretation of results
The image SNR value obtained on a system is influenced by system and
sequence factors. Example system factors are the main magnetic field strength
B0 and the design of the radiofrequency receive and transmit systems. Example
sequence factors are voxel size, scan time and sampling bandwidth.
Table 53. In-built body coil signal to noise ratio experimental conditions
GE-ES GE-TWS PH-INT PH-ACH SI-SYM SI-AVA
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Temperature
24 25 22.5 23 21 20
°C
Bandwidth
11.90 11.90 28.80 23.26 16.64 16.64
kHz
MAGFF- MAGFF- MAGFF- MAGFF- MAGFF-
Test object TO1A_L
Loaded Loaded Loaded Loaded Loaded
Siemens
Additional
None None - None Body None
loading
Loader
Q factor 0.84 0.84 0.79 0.81 1.18 0.43
79
Technical evaluation
PH-INT
PH-ACH
GE-ES
SI-SYM
GE-TWS
SI-AVA
80
Technical evaluation
Analysis
The average of several intensity profiles is calculated in all three directions. The
fractional uniformity is calculated for each direction from the fraction of the
profile that lies within 10% of the mean value of a central ROI (Lerski 1998).
The optimum value is unity, indicating 100% of the signal is considered uniform
over the measured distance.
Interpretation of results
Results describe unfiltered images. Filtering is likely to improve image
uniformity usually at the expense of image resolution. The optimum value of
fractional uniformity is 1.00. Fractional uniformity results in the x, y and z
directions are presented in Table 55 and in Graph 11.
81
Technical evaluation
GE-TWS
PH-INT
GE-ES
PH-ACH
SI-SYM
SI-AVA
82
Technical evaluation
Analysis
The SNR was calculated using a subtraction method; two identical scans were
acquired and a difference image obtained. The mean signal was measured from
five regions of interest within the test object area in one of the acquired images
and the noise was measured from the standard deviation from these regions in
the difference image (Dietrich 2005). The values obtained for SNR were
normalised for voxel size (including measured slice width), scan time, sampling
bandwidth. There was no correction for coil loading.
Interpretation of results
The image SNR value obtained on a system is influenced by system and
sequence factors. Example system factors are the main magnetic field strength
B0 and the design of the radiofrequency receive and transmit systems. Example
sequence factors are voxel size, scan time and sampling bandwidth.
Table 56. Experimental conditions for multi-channel head coil SNR test
GE-ES GE-TWS PH-INT PH-ACH SI-SYM SI-AVA
Coil tested 8-channel 8-channel Sense Sense 8-channel Head
high high Head Head head array Matrix
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
resolution resolution
brain coil brain coil
Temperature 24 25 Not 23 23 20
°C measured
Bandwidth 11.90 11.90 14.00 23.26 16.64 16.64
kHz
Sequence SE for SE for SE for SE for TSE with TSE with
parallel parallel parallel parallel ETL=1 ETL=1
imaging off imaging off imaging off imaging off
TSE (Turbo TSE (Turbo TSE (Turbo TSE (Turbo
factor = 2) factor = 2) factor = 2) factor = 2)
for parallel for parallel for parallel for parallel
imaging imaging imaging imaging
83
Technical evaluation
Table 57. Multi-channel head coil normalised signal to noise ratio (NSNR)
Parallel imaging
Transverse Sagittal Coronal Average
factor
84
Technical evaluation
PH-ACH
GE-ES
SI-SYM
SI-AVA (TRIPLE)
parallel
SI-AVA (DUAL) imaging off
factor 2
SI-AVA (CP)
GE-TWS
PH-INT
85
Technical evaluation
Analysis
The average of several intensity profiles is calculated in all three directions. The
fractional uniformity is calculated for each direction from the fraction of the
profile that lies within 10% of the mean value of a central ROI (Lerski 1998).
The optimum value is unity, indicating 100% of the signal is considered uniform
over the measured distance.
Interpretation of results
Results describe unfiltered images. Filtering is likely to improve image
uniformity usually at the expense of image resolution. The optimum value of
fractional uniformity is 1.00. Fractional uniformity results in the x, y and z
directions are presented in Table 58 and in Graph 13.
86
Technical evaluation
PH-INT
SI-AVA (CP)
SI-AVA (TRIPLE)
SI-AVA (DUAL)
PH-ACH
GE-TWS
GE-ES
SI-SYM
87
Technical evaluation
Analysis
The SNR was calculated using a subtraction method; two identical scans were
acquired and a difference image obtained. The mean signal was measured from
five regions of interest within the test object area in one of the acquired images
and the noise was measured from the standard deviation from these regions in
the difference image (Dietrich 2005). The values obtained for SNR were
normalised for voxel size (including measured slice width), scan time, sampling
bandwidth. There was no correction for coil loading.
Interpretation of results
The image SNR value obtained on a system is influenced by system and
sequence factors. Example system factors are the main magnetic field strength
B0 and the design of the radiofrequency receive and transmit systems. Example
sequence factors are voxel size, scan time and sampling bandwidth. The
normalised signal to noise ratio value is used for comparison as it is
independent of sequence parameters and test-object specific system
performance. The normalised SNR results for the multi-channel body coil are
presented in Table 60 and in Graph 14.
Table 59. Experimental conditions for multi-channel body coil SNR test
GE-ES GE-TWS PH-INT PH-ACH SI-SYM SI-AVA
Coil tested 8-channel 8-channel Sense Body Sense Body CP Body Body Matrix
high high (x2) (x2) Array & CP & Spine
definition definition Body Array Matrix
cardiac array cardiac array Extender
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
Temperature 24 25 Not 23 23 20
°C measured
Bandwidth 11.90 11.90 14.00 23.26 16.64 16.64
kHz
Sequence SE for SE for E for SE for TSE with TSE with
parallel parallel parallel parallel ETL=1 ETL=1
imaging off imaging off imaging off imaging off
TSE TSE TSE TSE
(Turbo (Turbo (Turbo (Turbo
factor = 2) factor = 2) factor = 2) factor = 2)
for parallel for parallel for parallel for parallel
imaging imaging imaging imaging
88
Technical evaluation
89
Technical evaluation
SI-SYM
SI-AVA (DUAL)
SI-AVA (TRIPLE)
SI-AVA (CP)
Parallel
PH-ACH imaging off
factor 2
GE-ES
GE-TWS
PH-INT
90
Technical evaluation
Analysis
The average of several intensity profiles is calculated in all three directions. The
fractional uniformity is calculated for each direction from the fraction of the
profile that lies within 10% of the mean value of a central ROI (Lerski 1998).
The optimum value is unity, indicating 100% of the signal is considered uniform
over the measured distance.
Interpretation of results
Results describe unfiltered images. Filtering is likely to improve image
uniformity usually at the expense of image resolution. The optimum value of
fractional uniformity is 1.00. Fractional uniformity results in the x, y and z
directions are presented in Table 61 and in Graph 15.
91
Technical evaluation
PH-INT
PH-ACH
SI-AVA (CP)
SI-AVA (DUAL)
SI-SYM
GE-TWS
GE-ES
92
Technical evaluation
Interpretation of results
Both the 2D and 3D imaging speed tests require a fixed volume to be acquired
using 2D and 3D fast imaging sequences. The aim of these tests is to measure
data acquisition speed in voxels/second. The voxel size is defined by the image
matrix and the number of slices in the fixed range. Both the 2D and 3D imaging
speed tests allow for the use of parallel imaging techniques.
CEP comment
Imaging speed has been calculated as the ratio of imaged voxels to total scan
time. The total scan time is the time displayed by the scanner, rather than the
number of phase-encoding steps × repetition time (TR).
The numerical results of the 2D and 3D imaging speed tests are presented in
the Appendix. The following graphs show the results for no parallel imaging
speeding (parallel imaging off or parallel imaging factor=1) and for parallel
imaging factor =2.
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
93
Technical evaluation
PH-INT
PH-ACH
GE-TWS No parallel
imaging
speeding
Parallel
GE-ES imaging
factor=2
GE-TWS
GE-ES
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
No parallel
imaging
speeding
Parallel
PH-ACH imaging
factor=2
94
Technical evaluation
SI-AVA No parallel
imaging
speeding
Parallel
imaging
factor=2
GE-ES
GE-TWS
No parallel
imaging
speeding
Parallel
imaging
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
PH-ACH
factor=2
95
Technical evaluation
SI-AVA
SI-SYM
GE-TWS
No parallel
GE-ES imaging
speeding
PH-INT
No parallel
imaging
GE-ES speeding
Parallel
imaging
factor=2
PH-ACH
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
GE-TWS
96
Technical evaluation
Acoustic noise
Acoustic noise levels are given in terms of the continuous equivalent level, LAEQ,
which is A-weighted root-mean-square sound pressure level (SPL) averaged
over the measurement period of 1 minute. The relevant safety levels follow.
MHRA
Hearing protection is recommended for all patients even when exposure is less
than 99 dB(A). Where sites can demonstrate noise levels significantly below
85 dB(A) then this requirement may be relaxed. Please refer to Guidelines for
Magnetic Resonance Diagnostic Equipment in Clinical Use: Medical Devices
Agency 2002.
Staff
The UK legislation is to meet the requirements of the EU DIRECTIVE
2003/10/EC and The Control of Noise at Work Regulations 2005 (effective
from 6 April 2006)
Employers have legal duty to protect the hearing of their employees. Hearing
protection must be available for workers exposed to 80 dB(A) and must be worn
if levels exceed 85 dB(A). Employers are responsible for performing risk
assessments for employees exposed to noise. This would include staff present
in the MR scan room during imaging.
97
Technical evaluation
SI-AVA
PH-ACH
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
SI-SYM
PH-INT
GE-TWS
GE-ES
98
Technical evaluation
Safety notice MDA SN 9517. Risk of burns to patients, with attached monitoring
leads, undergoing MRI scan: Medical Devices Agency. July 1995.
99
Technical evaluation
Other bodies
IEC 60601-2-33:2002 (Medical Electrical Equipment. Part 2. Particular
Requirements for Safety. Section 2.33 Specifications for Magnetic Resonance
Equipment for Medical Diagnosis). www.iec.ch
NHS advice
Health Building Note (HBN) 6, supplement 1:Accommodation for Magnetic
Resonance Imaging. 1994. Produced by NHS Estates, published by HMSO PO
Box 276, London SW8 5DT. ISBN 0113217307.
Health Building Note (HBN) 6, Volume 3:Extremity and open MRI, magnetic
shielding and construction for radiation protection. 2003. Produced by NHS
Estates, published by HMSO PO Box 276, London SW8 5DT. ISBN
0113224869.
100
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge the support of GE, Philips and Siemens Medical
Solutions during these evaluations. In particular we would like to thank Mr
Ricardo Becerra, Mr John Johnson from GE, Mr Frans Donders, Dr Elizabeth
Moore from Philips, Dr Eckart Stetter, Dr Thorsten Speckner, Mr Patrick Revell
from Siemens, for their expert assistance during the technical tests.
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
101
References
102
Appendix
Manufacturers’ comments
GE
Gradient system: Please note that GE specifies gradient strength and gradient slew rate for
each individual axis.
Speed parameters (Table 9): 2D Gradient Echo sequence used allows EPI readout and hence
has a higher mimimum TR/TE compared to another manufacturer. Note also that key technical
data (e.g.: mimimum TR/TE for various sequences, gradient strength and slew rate, image
reconstruction speed) are based on manufacturer information and are not cross-checked by
MagNET: one manufacturer did not give his sequence performances for 256 matrix as requested
Sequence information: In parallel to dedicated High coil element Density (HD) solutions which
has proven their outcome, signature applications (like Propeller, etc…) are dedicated sequences
specifically optimized for organs. It constitutes today a major improvement of MR in terms of
robustness: capacity to reproduce consistent image quality across patients.
Philips
Main computer system- image processor: Philips high linearity does not require additional
reconstruction time that is not taken into account with competitive systems. Competitive systems
have reconstruction times that are many factors lower when linearity correction is switched on.
Gradient system: Philips wants to stress that highest amplitude and slew-rate are reach without
compromising linearity or field of view. Philips gradients feature a FoV of 53 cm with a linearity of
1.4% for all gradient types and modes (even the dual mode Nova).
Head coil uniformity: The Philips Head coil uses an RF mirror. This results in a faster signal
drop-off in the neck but a better signal in the brain.
Parallel imaging: Philips uses true scan acceleration factors. E.g. A SENSE factor of 2 truly is
twice as fast (Philips does not require reference data within the scan allowing highest possible
speeds)
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
103
Appendix
Siemens
SNR evaluations: The normalized SNR is strongly dependent on the measured Q factors
obtained from volunteers which are used within normalization procedure. For example the Q
body for the in-built body resonator is highly dependent on the weight, physical condition and
position of the volunteer within the resonator. All uncertainties concerning reproducibility from
system to system of these parameters will result in systematic errors of the obtained normalized
SNR values. The reader should be aware of this when comparing normalized SNR values from
different systems which can be acquired under non comparable loading conditions.
Additionally, Siemens does not recommend using the in-built body resonator for receive. Tim
technology offers a comprehensive set of Matrix coils to cover the whole body. This results in
best possible SNR for all clinical applications, including whole body imaging.
Comparative specifications: Key technical data (e.g. gradient strength and slew rate, image
reconstruction speed) are based on manufacturer information and are not cross-checked by
MagNET applying independent experimental procedures. The reader of this document should be
aware that some manufacturers define these specifications in a different way making direct
comparison invalid. Please note that Siemens specifies gradient strength and gradient slew rate
for each individual axis (and not as a vector summation).
Spatial resolution: The MTF of a properly calibrated MRI system with 2D-spin single echo
imaging is (in absence of raw data filters) rectangular with a step from one to zero at pi/(nominal
pixel size). To see this the analysis has to be performed on the complex image data prior to the
application of the magnitude operator [Steckner et al., Med. Phys. 21 (3), 1994 and examples
provided therein]. The presented data are obtained from magnitude images. The differences of
the calculated values to the nominal pixel resolution may result from the applied magnitude
operator on the evaluated image and therefore probably will not represent a true resolution
difference.
Parallel imaging SNR: Evaluation or comparison on images acquired using parallel imaging
techniques requires to keep in mind that the noise background is not uniform so the results are
dependent on the ROI choice.
CEP comment
CEP recognises that the image noise can be spatially dependent in images acquired using
parallel imaging techniques. An average is taken from 5 ROIs placed on the image. The
technique used by CEP has been shown to be robust for parallel imaging acquisitions, as shown
in ISMRM (Influence of Parallel Imaging and Other Reconstruction Techniques on the
Measurement of Signal-To-Noise Ratios, Olaf Dietrich, Scott B. Reeder, Maximilian F. Reiser,
Stefan O. Schoenberg, Proceedings of ISMRM, 7-13 May 2005, Florida USA, Abstract No 158)
Toshiba
The manufacturer had no additional comments
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
104
Appendix
105
Appendix
Table 65. Scan parameters for 2D imaging speed evaluation on the GE MRI
system (Echospeed gradients)
Sequence parameter Sequence parameter values
Imaging coil 8-channel high resolution brain coil
2D sequence 2DFGRE GRE-EPI FSE-XL
TE (ms) 1.9 133.7 67.9 3.3
TR (ms) 3.9 11000 5600 20895
Flip angle (degrees) 60 90 Not measured
NSA 1 1 1
Bandwidth 166.67 250 83.33
Echo Train Length Not applicable Not applicable
FOV (mm) 250 250 250
Matrix (PE x FE) 256 x 256 256 x 256 256 x 256
Slice width (mm) 5 5 4.2
Parallel imaging factors off 1.5 2.0 off 2.0 off 1.5 2.0
Range (mm) 200 200 201.6
Contiguous slices 40 40 48
Scan time (min:sec) 0:42 0:29 0:22 0:11 0:06 0:42 0:31 0:21
Table 66. Scan parameters for 2D imaging speed evaluation on the GE MRI
system (Twinspeed gradients)
Sequence parameter Sequence parameter values
Imaging coil 8-channel high resolution brain coil
2D sequence 2DFGRE GRE-EPI FSE-XL
TE (ms) 1.6 113 57.4 3.3
TR (ms) 3.5 9300 4800 21000
Flip angle (degrees) 10 90 Not measured
NSA 1 1 1
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
106
Appendix
Table 67. Scan parameters for 2D imaging speed evaluation on the Philips
Intera MRI system (Explorer gradients)
Sequence parameter Sequence parameter values
Imaging coil SENSE Head Coil
2D sequence FFE
TE (ms) 2.0
TR (ms) 177
Flip angle (degrees) 30
NSA 1
Bandwidth Not measured
Echo Train Length Not applicable
FOV (mm) 250
Matrix (PE x FE) 256 x 256
Slice width (mm) 5
Parallel imaging factors off 2 4 6
Range (mm) 200
Contiguous slices 50
Scan time (min:sec) 0:45 0:23 0:12 0:07
Table 68. Scan parameters for 2D imaging speed evaluation on the Philips
Achieva MRI system (Nova Dual gradients)
Sequence parameter Sequence parameter values
Imaging coil 8-channel SENSE head coil
2D sequence 2D-FFE FE-EPI 2D-TSE
TE (ms) 1.95 13 3.92
TR (ms) 144 1025 6500
Flip angle (degrees) 10 10 30
NSA 1 1 1
Bandwidth Not measured Not measured Not measured
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
107
Appendix
108
Appendix
Table 72. Scan parameters for 3D imaging speed evaluation on the GE MRI
system (Echospeed gradients)
Sequence parameter Sequence parameter values
Imaging coil 8-channel high resolution brain coil
3D sequence FSPGR FRFSE-XL
TE (ms) 1.1 22.1
TR (ms) 2.0 200
Flip angle (degrees) 10 Not measured
NSA 1 1
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
109
Appendix
Table 73. Scan parameters for 3D imaging speed evaluation on the GE MRI
system (Twinspeed gradients)
Sequence parameter Sequence parameter values
Imaging coil 8-channel high resolution brain coil
3D sequence FSPGR FRFSE-XL
TE (ms) 0.9 35
TR (ms) 1.7 220
Flip angle (degrees) 10 Not measured
NSA 1 1
Bandwidth 125 125
Echo Train Length Not applicable 32
FOV (mm) 250 x 250 x 201.6 250 x 250 x 200
Matrix (PE x FE) 128 x 128 128 x 128
Slice width (mm) 1.6 2.0
Parallel imaging factors off 1.5 2.0 off 2
Range (mm) 201.6 200
Contiguous slices 126 100
Scan time (min:sec) 0:28 0:19 0:14 1:29 0:45
Table 74. Scan parameters for 3D imaging speed evaluation on the Philips
Intera MRI system (Explorer gradients)
Sequence parameter Sequence parameter values
Imaging coil SENSE Head coil
2D sequence 3D FFE
TE (ms) 1.35
TR (ms) 3.1
Flip angle (degrees) 30
NSA 1
Bandwidth Not measured
Report 06005: 1.5 T MRI systems - issue 7
110
Appendix
Table 75. Scan parameters for 3D imaging speed evaluation on the Philips
Achieva system (Nova Dual gradients)
Sequence parameter Sequence parameter values
Imaging coil 8-channel SENSE head coil
3D sequence 3D-FFE 3D-TSE
TE (ms) 1.16 5.1
TR (ms) 2.4 268
Flip angle (degrees) 10 30
NSA 1 1
Bandwidth Not measured Not measured
Echo Train Length Not applicable 34
FOV (mm) 250 x 250 x 199.68 250 x 250 x 199.68
Matrix (PE x FE) 128 x 128 128 x 128
Slice width (mm) 1.56 1.56
Parallel imaging factors off 2 4 8 off 2 4 8
Range (mm) 199.68 199.68
Contiguous slices 128 128
Scan time (min:sec) 0:39 0:19 0:10 0:05 1:44 0:36 0:18 0:10
111
Appendix
112
Appendix
System
off 1 2 4 6 8
Not Not Not Not
GE-ES 74898 149796
applicable applicable applicable applicable
Not Not Not Not
GE-TWS 74898 149796
applicable applicable applicable applicable
Not Not
PH-ACH 65048 60494 120989 483958
measured measured
Not Not Not Not Not Not
SI-SYM
measured applicable measured measured measured measured
Not Not Not Not Not Not
SI-AVA
measured applicable measured measured measured measured
113
Appendix
114