Syn Gas Compressor Oil Tank Explosion
Syn Gas Compressor Oil Tank Explosion
Syn Gas Compressor Oil Tank Explosion
Svein Hansen
Yara Norge A.S. (Porsgrunn)
Introduction
Incident Summary
T
he Porsgrunn Ammonia Plant was com-
missioned in 1968 and produces 1450 On the 24th of April 2017, at 02:43 am, a trip oc-
MTPD. The syngas compressor has four curred in the ammonia plant in Porsgrunn due to
stages, a circulator, an electrical motor a major external power supply fluctuation. The
and a steam turbine to increase the pressure from electrical driven process air compressor stopped,
20 to 280 bars (290-4060 psi). The syngas com- a shut-down sequence was initiated, and the syn-
pressor is located in a building with a gross vol- gas compressor tripped.
ume of 24.000 m3 (850.000 ft³). The process air
compressor is in the same building. There are two After stabilizing the ammonia plant’s front-end,
separate oil systems, one for the process air and the shift operators were preparing for a restart of
one for the syngas compressor train. The oil sys- the process air compressor. Suddenly, an explo-
tem for the syngas compressor contains an sion occurred in the main syngas oil tank (T-
amount of 35 m3(1235 ft³), covering lube, seal 401), located at the ground floor of the compres-
and regulator oil. sor hall. The explosion occurred at 03:13, 30
minutes after the trip of the back-end of the am-
Safeguarding the Building and Machines monia plant. An intense fire developed rapidly
inside the building.
Thirteen explosive gas detectors are located in
the inside of the roof, close to the vents in the
Two field operators were present in the compres-
building. The 3rd and 4th stage, circulator driven
sor building at that moment, both were able to es-
by the steam turbine are equipped with a water
cape. The panel operator immediately initiated
mist system, which is activated automatically by
the emergency shutdown of the entire ammonia
flame detectors. These detectors react on fire
plant, contacted the emergency response team
containing hydrocarbons, they thereby target fire
and activated the mitigation device i.e. the foam
originating from oil. A camera monitors the exact
system.
same area and is visible on a screen in the control
room. There is also a foam system installed in the
The Emergency Response Team quickly arrived
building designed to fill the ground floor with fire
on site and after identifying the main fire source
suffocating foam within 5 minutes. This system
and setting up their equipment, they were able to
is activated manually by the operator.
• The air compressor supplying the ASU We concluded that we had all the components
stopped, but the nitrogen compressor kept on needed for an explosion in the tank. Oil vapor
running. The flow scheme of the ASU is il- probably containing hydrogen degassed from oil
lustrated in figure 4. to a limited extent, ignited as oxygen enriched
• The nitrogen compressor started to take in ambient air entered the T-401 tank.
ambient air via the flow control valve as the
pressure from the ASU decreased. In addi- The nitrogen compressor did not stop because the
tion, the ambient air was enriched by oxygen pressure switch on the suction side was removed.
from the ASU’s coldbox. The time delay for It proved itself difficult to determine why, or
the analyzer to respond to an oxygen contam- even when the pressure switch was removed. It
ination in the nitrogen was found to be ap- probably happened when we did a PLC upgrade
proximately 10 minutes. in 2010. There was no updated HAZID or PHA
done for the ASU.
The analyzer detect oxygen just before 03:00.
Given the uncertainties around the precise event When It Rains It Pours...
timing and residence time evaluation, this is con- There are several explosive gas detectors in the
sistent with the assumption that air was intro- building where the fire occurred. If two out of
duced in the nitrogen grid at around 02:48. At three detectors exceed a defined limit, a vent sys-
03:08 the nitrogen compressor was manually tem operates to dilute the combustible gases by
stopped, and the nitrogen supply was thereafter adding air. Three fans go to a maximum vent
100% from the main back up supply (liquid ni- mode forcing 170 m3/s of air into the building.
trogen tank). The building has a net volume of 21000 m3
(741,600 ft³).
Figure 6. End lid oil channels highlighted. Finally, after the repairs in 2017, a photo was
taken from the compressor hall as in figure 8 be-
In June 2018 we had to stop the plant due to op- low.
erational issues. We took the opportunity to dis-
mantle and check the 4th stage end lid. The leak
we found was significant. We re-plugged the
leakage, as the new lid hadn’t arrived yet. The
plant was restarted, and new samples were taken
from the gas phase of T-401 as shown in the last
column of table 1. In figure 7 it is also clear that
since the repair in June 2018 the gas phase is sig-
nificantly less explosive.
Figure 8. Compressor building after repair.