Descarga
Descarga
Descarga
Original Article
Abstract
This article describes the environmental impacts of producing a single seedling in forest nurseries of selected
districts (i.e., Haripur, Abbottabad, and Mansehra) of Hazara Division of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan using the
life cycle assessment (LCA) approach. This study was based on the cradle-to-gate approach which begins with
the pre-nursery stage and progresses toward the main nursery before transplanting seedlings into the plantation
site. Data or life cycle inventory (LCI) of seedling production were collected through questionnaire surveys and
personal meetings with forest nurseries managers and workers regarding consumption of different inputs such
as electricity, diesel, fertilizers, herbicides, and polyethylene bags, organic manure, and water consumption. The
SimaPro software version 8.5 and the CML2000 v2.05 environmental model was applied to perform life cycle
impact assessment (LCIA) for a single seedling production in forest nurseries in the study area. In line with
the objectives of the study, primary data regarding inputs and outputs of the nurseries were collected from 35
nurseries in the study area by using a random questionnaire method. In addition, secondary data were taken
from online databases such as Eco-invent v.3.2 CORRIM and peer-reviewed published literature. For this study, a
functional unit of a single seedling was considered. Production weighted average data were modeled in the latest
environmental modeling software i.e., SimaPro v.8.5 for ten US-EPA most wanted environmental impacts, such
as global warming potential (GWP), abiotic depletion (AD), eutrophication potential (EP), acidification potential
(AP), freshwater aquatic eco-toxicity (FAE), marine water eco-toxicity (MWE), terrestrial eco-toxicity (TE), ozone
layer depletion (OLD), photochemical oxidation (PO), and human toxicity (HT). The results showed that the highest
environmental impact posed by a single seedling was marine aquatic eco-toxicity (11.31360 kg 1,4-DB eq), followed
by global warming potential (0.02945 kg CO2 eq) and (0.01227 kg 1,4-DB eq) human toxicity. The primary reason
for these environmental burdens was the use of synthetic fertilizers in forest nurseries and the consumption of
fossil fuels in nursery mechanization and transportation activities. The total cumulative energy demand for a
single seedling was (0.800 MJ) with more than 90% contribution from fossil fuel energy resources such as petrol
and diesel. It is therefore highly recommended to use renewable energy resources and organic fertilizers instead
of chemical fertilizers in forest nurseries to avoid and minimize greenhouse gas emissions (GHS) and other toxic
emissions in the study area.
Keywords: forest nurseries, seedlings, environmental impacts, LCA, BTAP, Pakistan.
Resumo
Este artigo descreve os impactos ambientais da produção de uma única muda em viveiros florestais de distritos
selecionados (Haripur, Abbottabad e Manshera) da divisão Hazara, de Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Paquistão, usando
a abordagem de avaliação do ciclo de vida (ACV). Este estudo baseou-se na abordagem “do berço ao portão”, que
*e-mail: [email protected]
Received: February 1, 2022 – Accepted: April 1, 2022
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
se inicia na fase pré-viveiro e progride em direção ao viveiro principal antes do transplante das mudas para o
local de plantio. Os dados ou inventário de ciclo de vida (ICV) da produção de mudas foram coletados por meio
de questionários e reuniões pessoais com o gerente e os trabalhadores dos viveiros florestais sobre o consumo de
diferentes insumos, como energia elétrica, diesel, fertilizantes, herbicidas, sacos de polietileno, adubo orgânico e
consumo de água. O software SimaPro, versão 8.5, e o modelo ambiental CML2000, v2.05, foram aplicados para
realizar a avaliação de impacto do ciclo de vida (AICV) de uma única produção de mudas em viveiros florestais na
área de estudo. Em consonância com os objetivos do estudo, os dados primários relativos às entradas e saídas dos
viveiros foram coletados de 35 viveiros na área de estudo por meio de um método de questionário aleatório. Além
disso, dados secundários foram obtidos de bancos de dados online, como Eco-invent v.3.2 CORRIM e literatura
publicada revisada por pares. Para este estudo, foi considerada uma unidade funcional de uma única plântula. Os
dados médios ponderados de produção foram modelados no software de modelagem ambiental mais recente, ou
seja, SimaPro, v.8.5, para 10 impactos ambientais mais desejados pela US-EPA, como potencial de aquecimento
global (PAG), depleção abiótica (DA), potencial de eutrofização (PE), potencial de acidificação (PA), ecotoxicidade
de água doce (EAD), ecotoxicidade da água marinha (EAM), ecotoxicidade terrestre (ET), destruição da camada de
ozônio (DCO), oxidação fotoquímica (OF) e toxicidade humana (TH). Os resultados mostraram que o maior impacto
ambiental causado por uma única muda foi a ecotoxicidade da água marinha (11,31360 kg 1,4-DB eq), seguido
pelo potencial de aquecimento global (0,02945 kg CO2 eq) e toxicidade humana (0,01227 kg 1,4-DB eq) eq). A
principal razão para esses ônus ambientais foi o uso de fertilizantes sintéticos em viveiros florestais e o consumo
de combustíveis fósseis nas atividades de mecanização e transporte de viveiros. A demanda total acumulada
de energia para uma única muda foi de 0,800 MJ, com mais de 90% de contribuição de recursos energéticos
de combustíveis fósseis, como gasolina e diesel. Portanto, é altamente recomendável usar recursos de energia
renovável e fertilizantes orgânicos em vez de fertilizantes químicos em viveiros florestais para evitar e minimizar
as emissões de gases de efeito estufa (GEE) e outras emissões tóxicas na área de estudo.
Palavras-chave: viveiros florestais, mudas, impactos ambientais, ACV, BTAP, Paquistão.
life cycle assessment research on seedlings production. There life cycle. However, a more restricted strategy is described
are also few studies done in Pakistan on LCA regarding the (cradle to gate or gate to gate) to focus on certain stages
carbon footprint of particleboard production (Hussain et al., of the life cycle assessment (McDonough and Braungart,
2017). Instead, international scientific literature contains 2002). Indicators are the outcome of the impact evaluation
countless environmental studies using LCA methodology stage of the life cycle (Guinee et al., 2001). There are some
done with the aim of evaluating the environmental profile impacts that have a localized effect on the environment
of seedlings production in Malaysia, Italy, and the USA about (e.g., photochemical smog and eutrophication), while
the production of seedlings of oil palm, walnut tree, and others produce worldwide effects (e.g., global warming
forest resources (Halimah et al., 2010; Cambria & Pierangeli, and ozone depletion) (Azapagic and Perdan, 2000).
2011; Johnson et al., 2007). This study evaluates the total GHG emissions of seedlings
In environmental policy, LCA can play a role in evaluating production and seeds transportation, including insecticides,
the environmental impact of a manufacturing process fertilizers, water, fossil fuels, consumption of electricity,
(Kouchaki-Penchah et al., 2016). It can also be used to and seedlings transportation to plantation sites in Pakistan.
identify possibilities for productivity growth and cost This study was conducted to evaluate the environmental
reduction (Rivela et al., 2006). In order to reduce greenhouse sustainability of softwood and hardwood seedlings
gas (GHS) emissions, many countries carry out studies on production in nurseries in Pakistan. The work could disclose
LCA (Kim and Song, 2014; Lee et al., 2004). In recent years, the hot spots in terms of sustainability that is helpful in
special attention has been paid to forestry activities to designing strategies and policies to promote sustainable
calculate their environmental profile to enhance worldwide nursery raising. To fulfill the objectives of this research,
competitiveness (González-García et al., 2014). LCA is a the following points were investigated: 1). to conduct life
standardized approach to evaluating the environmental cycle inventory of inputs and outputs for softwood and
effects of materials, goods, and services throughout their hardwood seedlings production in nurseries of selected
manufacturing systems and to supporting sustainable districts of Hazara division, Pakistan, 2). to identify the
decision-making policies (Baumann and Tillman, 2004). potential environment sustainability impacts associated
Due to the increase in global warming, products having with the production of seedlings on cradle-to-gate basis,
less environmental and human health impact gain and 3). to use this assessment for improving opportunities
more consideration (Garcia and Freire, 2014; Kouchaki- to mitigate the potential environmental impacts from
Penchah et al., 2016). To achieve these goals, a life cycle seedlings production in nurseries in Pakistan.
evaluation (LCA) method may be useful (Remmen, 2007).
Life cycle assessment is a comprehensive tool that can be
used to assess the main environmental issues of a product 2. Materials and Methods
and where they occur during the manufacturing process
(Silva et al., 2013; Curran, 2013; Baumann and Tillman, 2.1. Study area
2004; Rivela et al., 2006; Rauf and Crawford, 2015). In many The present study was conducted in the Hazara division
cases, to include the disposal of the product or their possible of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan from June
use and reuse, the LCA methodology is based on the cradle- 2019 to June 2020 as can be seen in Figure 1. This region
to-cradle approach or cradle-to-grave framework. This was selected based on the presence of nurseries including
gives the possibility to focus completely on the product’s forest and private.
2.2. Goal and scope of the study transported to the plantation site. The present study
This LCA study was conducted to achieve the objectives. system boundary includes pre-plantation inputs in
Defining the study’s goal and scope clearly, including the production of seedlings in nurseries. System boundary
selection of a functional unit (Curran, 2016). This study of the study consisted of the main life cycle stages of
is a cradle-to-gate life cycle inventory (LCI) of seedlings seedlings production in nurseries of Hazara division,
production in nurseries single seedling was taken as a Pakistan, i.e. seeds bought in this step, seeds purchased
reference unit. Nurseries owners were requested to provide from market or forests department and then transported
the input and output data of seedlings production from to nurseries on vehicles running on petrol and diesel,
June 2019 to June 2020. This study’s scope includes all after transportation of seeds land were prepared with
phases of nurseries cradle-to-gate which is existing in the help of tractor, then organic and inorganic fertilizers
the present study area, which is consist of the preparation were mixed in soil, seeds were sown in tubes and directly
of land, seeds sowing, insecticides, herbicides, watering, into the soil, after this regularly water were used for
fossil fuel, electricity, and transportation of seedlings watering, then herbicides were used for protection of
from nurseries to plantation sites. This study offers a seeds from weeds, However in the end saplings were
benchmark to formulate extensive research in the future on transported to the plantation sites.
environmental sustainability and GHG emissions produced
in the production of seedlings because no previous data is 2.5. Life cycle inventory
available on the LCA of softwood and hardwood seedlings The compilation of an inventory of appropriate energy
production in Pakistan.
and material inputs and the environment publishes
an inventory analysis of the life cycle (Curran, 2016).
2.3. Functional unit Primary data were collected regarding resource input/
Functional unit is defined as the reference point in output from Thirty-five nurseries of selected districts
which inputs and outputs of the system taken into account among Haripur, Abbottabad, and Mansehra of Hazara
are assigned. In the present study single seedling is taken division. The questionnaire survey included the necessary
as a functional unit (Mirabella et al., 2014). The related transportation details, assessment of the use of various
functional unit of the system was used to provide the input energy like fossil fuel, electricity, polybags, organic
seedling with food and non- food products handling and inorganic fertilizers along with plant protection
connections. Hence, a single seedling is the suitable chemicals insecticides, herbicides. Energy was used for
functional unit for this nursery LCA research. machinery to water the seedlings, transportation of
fertilizers, insecticides, herbicides, polybags along with
2.4. System boundary of the study transportation of seeds to the nursery, and in the end
The research system boundary is shown in Figure 2. transportation of the seedlings to the plantations, were
This LCA study has a cradle-to-gate system boundary, included in the inventory. The data uncertainty and quality
which begins from the transportation of the fresh seeds assurance were calculated using the Equations 1, 2, and
from market to the end of the 12-months old seedlings 3 as given below;
generate electricity through multiple sources such as assessment. This is the most considered category in
nuclear and fossil fuels. The main reason was that most of environment burdens in life cycle assessment. Abiotic
the electricity was consumed for producing one seedling depletion was estimated (0.00037 kg Sb eq) for single
using water motors. In the present study about (0.0013 L) seedling production in the study area during the year
fuel was consumed by the generators for single seedling 2019-2020 as summarized in Table 2.
production. In Pakistan, the energy crises are at their peak,
to tackle energy or power crises WAPDA do load shedding 3.2.2. Acidification
about 4 to 6 hours a daytime so, during load shedding Acidification is defined as the gradual change in the pH
time, they use a power generator to generate electricity of surface/ocean water due to the uptaking of CO2 from the
to run the water machines in the nurseries (Hussain et al., atmosphere. When carbon dioxide (CO2) reacts with sea or
2017). These generators were run by using petrol in the ocean water, it becomes acidic in nature. Approximately
present study area. About (0.00002 L) of herbicides were 30-40% of carbon dioxide from human activities is absorbed
used for the protection of single seedlings in the selected by oceans, lakes, and streams (Eshleman et al., 1995). In the
districts of the Hazara division. present study, acidification estimated for single seedling
About (0.0356 kg) of organic dunk manure was used production in selected districts of Hazara division was
annually to produce one seedling production in the (0.00016 kg SO2 eq).
study area. Manure was bought from near villages where
people have livestock and then transported to nurseries 3.2.3. Eutrophication
to fulfill the requirements. The average distance of
Eutrophication occurs when the concentration of
buying organic manure for single seedling production
minerals and nutrients increases in water bodies such
was (0.00001 km). A tractor trolley was used for the
as streams, lakes, rivers, and oceans which cause the
transportation of organic manure. To buy organic manure
growth of plants and algae (Chislock et al., 2013). In this
for single seedling production about (0.00001 L) diesel
process, the oxygen becomes depleted in the water body.
was consumed annually according to the data collected
The value of eutrophication was (0.00003 kg PO4 eq) for
from the study area. The average distance to transplant
single seedling production in the study area.
a single seedling produced in nurseries is (0.0002 km).
These seedlings are transported to mountainous areas
3.2.4. Global warming potential
for afforestation practices to maintain the forest cover.
Seedlings are also transported to urban areas for roadside Global warming is the gradual increase in the rate of
plantations, agroforestry practices, etc. To transplant, a earth’s average temperature due to greenhouse (GHGs)
single seedling of about (0.0001 L) of fuel was consumed gases such as chlorofluorocarbon (CFC), carbon dioxide
for the transportation of seedlings to planting sites. Most (CO2), and other excessive pollution caused by humans
of the areas were mountainous, so high fuel consumption (Iritani et al., 2014). Due to the greenhouse effect, the lower
was recorded in the study area according to the data atmosphere temperature increases and as a result, climate
collected from 35 nurseries in three districts. change occurs. About (0.02945 kg CO2 eq) global warming
potential was estimated for single seedling production in
3.2. Environmental impacts posed by single seedling selected districts of the Hazara division.
production in forest nurseries
The environmental impact posed by single seedling
production in selected districts of Hazara division Pakistan Table 2. Environmental impacts posed by single seedling production
during 2019-2020 is mentioned in Table 2. Then ten in selected districts of Hazara division during 2019-20.
environmental impact categories were considered in this
study: marine aquatic eco-toxicity, ozone layer depletion, Impact category Unit Total
abiotic depletion, eutrophication, acidification, human
Abiotic depletion kg Sb eq 0.00037
toxicity, freshwater aquatic eco-toxicity, photochemical
oxidation, terrestrial eco-toxicity, and global warming Acidification kg SO2 eq 0.00016
potential. The highest environmental impact was posed Eutrophication kg PO4 eq 0.00003
by marine aquatic eco-toxicity (11.31360 kg 1, 4-DB eq) Global warming kg CO2 eq 0.02945
followed by global warming potentials (0.02945 kg CO2 eq) (GWP100)
and human toxicity (0.01227 kg 1,4-DB eq), then freshwater
Ozone layer depletion kg CFC-11 eq 0.000000003
aquatic eco-toxicity (0.00482 kg 1,4-DB eq) and abiotic
(ODP)
depletion (0.00037 kg Sb eq), followed by acidification
(0.00016 kg SO2 eq) and eutrophication (0.00003 kg Human toxicity kg 1,4-DB eq 0.01227
PO4 eq) and photochemical oxidation (0.00001 kg C2H4 eq). Freshwater aquatic eco- kg 1,4-DB eq 0.00482
toxicity
3.2.1. Abiotic depletion (AB) Marine aquatic eco- kg 1,4-DB eq 11.31360
Abiotic depletion is the reduction of natural resources, toxicity
such as iron ore, minerals, and crude oil (González- Terrestrial eco-toxicity kg 1,4-DB eq 0.00015
García et al., 2011). It is one of the environmental impact
Photochemical oxidation kg C2H4 eq 0.00001
categories, which can be assessed through a life cycle
3.2.5. Ozone layer depletion (Finnveden et al., 2009). The four impact categories that
Ozone layer depletion is the gradual thinning of the were investigated in the present study were renewable
earth’s ozone layer in the atmosphere due to greenhouse water, renewable biomass, non-renewable nuclear, and
gases (GHGs) and human activities (Hertwich et al., 2001). non-renewable fossil as summarized in Table 3. During
The ozone layer has the potential to prevent ultraviolet solar the production process, different types of energy were
radiation to touch the earth’s surface. These radiations are required to run the machines for the manufacturing of
very dangerous and cause cancer in humans and plants. single seedling production in selected districts of the
The value of the ozone layer for single seedling production Hazara division during 2019-2020. Electricity was the main
energy source to run the nurseries for the production of
was (0.000000003 kg CFC-11 eq) in the study area.
seedlings. In the present study, the total CED for single
seedling production in selected districts of the Hazara
3.2.6. Human toxicity
division during 2019-2020 was (0.800 MJ) from the four
The degree at which a mixture of substances (such as impact categories i.e., renewable water, renewable biomass,
heavy metals) damages human health (Hertwich et al., non-renewable nuclear, and non-renewable fossil, as
2001). It includes both generic and inherent toxicity summarized in Table 3. The highest contribution was from
relationships for emissions. About (0.01227 kg 1,4-DB the non-renewable fossil fuels-based energy (0.766 MJ)
eq) human toxicity was estimated for single seedling followed by renewable biomass (0.021 MJ), renewable
production in the selected districts of the Hazara division. water (0.011 MJ), and the lowest contribution was from
non-renewable biomass (0.001 MJ) as shown in Table 3.
3.2.7. Freshwater aquatic eco-toxicity
Freshwater aquatic eco-toxicity refers to the impact 3.4. Emissions inventory to air, soil, and water for single
on freshwater ecosystems (streams, springs, rivers, and seedling production
lakes) from the emissions of hazardous substances to Emission inventory results in hazardous substances
water, soil, and air. Freshwater is the major component of to air, soil, and water from single seedling production
aquatic resources globally. It plays a pivotal role in human in selected districts of the Hazara division during 2019-
life and provides an environmental habitat. To prevent 2020 as given in Tables 4-6 to 3.6. Most of the emissions
anthropogenic pollution, freshwater is considered to assess
water contaminations and pollutants. In the present study
approximately (0.00482 kg 1,4-DB eq) freshwater aquatic
eco-toxicity was estimated in the study area. Table 3. Cumulative energy demand (CED) for single seedling
production.
3.2.8. Marine aquatic eco-toxicity
Impact category Unit Total
Marine aquatic eco-toxicity is the impact of hazardous
Non-renewable, fossil MJ 0.766
substances on the aquatic ecosystem (Rand and Petrocelli,
1985). The value of marine aquatic eco-toxicity in the Non-renewable, biomass MJ 0.001
production of single seedling production was (11.31360 kg Renewable, biomass MJ 0.021
1,4-DB eq) in the selected districts of the Hazara division.
Renewable, water MJ 0.011
Total CED MJ 0.800
3.2.9. Terrestrial eco-toxicity
Terrestrial eco-toxicity refers to the effect of toxic
substances on the terrestrial ecosystem (Haye et al., 2007).
About (0.00015 kg 1,4-DB eq) was calculated for unit single
Table 4. Emission inventory to air for single seedling production
seedling production in the study area.
in selected districts of Hazara division during 2019-2020.
Cumulative energy demand (CED) is defined as the Zinc oxide Air pg 0.012
total energy required to produce, use, and end-life of a Silicon Air µg 73.791
product. CED is a method or way to investigate, examine and
Sodium hydroxide Air ng 62.029
declare the product as sustainable on the bases of energy
Table 5. Emission inventory to water for single seedling production presented in Table 2. Our results are in accordance with
in selected districts of Hazara division during 2019-2020. previous research in Italy (Cambria and Pierangeli, 2011).
In our study, it is observed that Marine aquatic eco-toxicity
Substance Compartment Unit Total
(11.31360 kg 1,4-DB eq), Human toxicity (0.01227 kg 1,4-DB
Acetic acid Water ng 819.816 eq), and Global warming (GWP100) (0.02945 kg CO2 eq)
2-Butene, 2-methyl- Water pg 2.900 have the highest environmental impact. Another important
study (Halimah et al., 2010) in Malaysia considers the
Ammonia Water µg 4.543
transportation of inputs to the nursery (polyethylene bags,
Asbestos Water pg 0.003 seeds, fertilizers, etc.). This aspect was also considered in
Calcium Water mg 127.893 our study, while was not considered in the previous case
study in Italy (Cambria and Pierangeli, 2011).
Chloroacetyl chloride Water ng 1.686
production (Part 1). Journal of Oil Palm Research, vol. 22, pp. MIRABELLA, N., CASTELLANI, V. and SALA, S., 2014. LCA for assessing
878-886. environmental benefit of eco-design strategies and forest wood
HAYE, S., SLAVEYKOVA, V.I. and PAYET, J., 2007. Terrestrial eco- short supply chain: a furniture case study. The International
toxicity and effect factors of metals in life cycle assessment Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1536-1550.
(LCA). Chemosphere, vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 1489-1496. http://dx.doi. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0757-7.
org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.03.019. PMid:17467037. MULEKE, E.M., SAIDI, M., ITULYA, F.M., MARTIN, T. and NGOUAJIO,
HERTWICH, E.G., MATELES, S.F., PEASE, W.S. and MCKONE, T.E., 2001. M., 2012. The assessment of the use of eco-friendly nets
Human toxicity potentials for life‐cycle assessment and toxics to ensure sustainable cabbage seedling production in
release inventory risk screening. Environmental Toxicology and Africa. Agronomy, 3(1), 1-12.
Chemistry: An International Journal, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 928-939. RAND, G.M. and PETROCELLI, S.R., 1985. Fundamentals of aquatic
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620200431. PMid:11345472. toxicology: methods and applications. Princeton, NJ: FMC Corp.
HUSSAIN, M., NASEEM MALIK, R. and TAYLOR, A.2017. Carbon footprint RAUF, A. and CRAWFORD, R.H., 2015. Building service life and its
as an environmental sustainability indicator for the particleboard effect on the life cycle embodied energy of buildings. Energy, vol.
produced in Pakistan. Environmental Research, vol. 155, pp. 385-393. 79, pp. 140-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.10.093.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.02.024. PMid:28288441. REMMEN, A., 2007. Life cycle management: a business guide to
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE – IPCC, 2019 sustainability. Nairobi, Kenya: UNEP/Earth print.
[viewed 5 June 2019]. Climate Change and Land: An IPCC special RIVELA, B., HOSPIDO, A., MOREIRA, T. and FEIJOO, G., 2006. Life
report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, cycle inventory of particleboard: a case study in the wood sector
sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas (8 pp). The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol. 11,
fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems [online]. Geneva, Switzerland: no. 2, pp. 106-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1065/lca2005.05.206.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Available from:
SILVA, D.A.L., MENDES, N.C., VARANDA, L.D., OMETTO, A.R. and
https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2019/08/4.-SPM_
LAHR, F.A.R., 2013. Life cycle assessment of urea-formaldehyde
Approved_Microsite_FINAL.pdf
resin: comparison by CML (2001), EDIP (1997) and USEtox
INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE – IUCN, (2008) methods for toxicological impact categories. In: A. NEE,
2015 [viewed 5 June 2015]. KPK Launches Billion-tree Drive–A B. SONG and S.K. ONG, eds. Re-engineering manufacturing for
Contribution to Global Forestation Campaign [online]. Available sustainability (pp. 529-534). Singapore: Springer. http://dx.doi.
from: https://www.iucn.org/content/kpk-launches-billion-tree- org/10.1007/978-981-4451-48-2_86.
drive-%E2%80%93-contribution-global-forestation-campaign
SURYANINGRUM, F., JARVIS, R.M., BUCKLEY, H.L., HALL, D. and
IRITANI, R., TAKEUCHI, N. and KAWAKATSU, H., 2014. Intricate CASE, B.S., 2021. Large-scale tree planting initiatives as an
heterogeneous structures of the top 300 km of the Earth’s inner opportunity to derive carbon and biodiversity co-benefits: a
core inferred from global array data: I. Regional 1D attenuation case study from Aotearoa New Zealand. New Forests, pp. 1-14.
and velocity profiles. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11056-021-09883-w.
vol. 230, pp. 15-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2014.02.002.
THE EXPRESS TRIBUNE, 2015 [viewed 18 May 2016]. The billion
JOHNSON, L.R., LIPPKE, B., MARSHALL, J.D. and COMNICK, J., 2007. tree Tsunami [online]. Available from: https://tribune.com.pk/
Life-cycle impacts of forest resource activities in the Pacific story/845800/the-billion-tree-tsunami
Northwest and Southeast United States. Wood and Fiber Science,
THE THIRD POLE, 2016 [viewed 18 May 2016]. Pakistan’s billion
vol. 37, pp. 30-46.
tree tsunami takes hold [online]. Available from: https://www.
KHARL, S. and XIE, X., 2017. Green growth initiative will lead toward thethirdpole.net/en/climate/pakistans-billion-tree-tsunami-
sustainable development of natural resources in Pakistan: an takes-hold/
Investigation of “Billion tree tsunami afforestation project”.
UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME – UNDP, 2019
Science International (Lahore), vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 841-843.
[viewed 18 May 2019]. Sustainable Development Goals Goal 15:
KIM, M.H. and SONG, H.B., 2014. Analysis of the global warming Life on Land [online]. New York, USA: UNDP. Available from:
potential for wood waste recycling systems. Journal of Cleaner https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-
Production, vol. 69, pp. 199-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. development-goals/goal-15-life-on-land.html
jclepro.2014.01.039. UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE
KOUCHAKI-PENCHAH, H., SHARIFI, M., MOUSAZADEH, H., ZAREA- CHANGE – UNFCCC, 2006 [viewed 18 May 2016]. Report of the
HOSSEINABADI, H. and NABAVI-PELESARAEI, A., 2016. Gate conference of the parties serving as the meeting of the Parties
to gate life cycle assessment of flat pressed particleboard to the Kyoto Protocol on its first session: FCCC/KP/CMP/2005/8/
production in Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Cleaner Add.3 [online]. Bonn, Switzerland: UNFCCC. Available from:
Production, vol. 112, pp. 343-350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2005/cmp1/eng/08a03.pdf
jclepro.2015.07.056. UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE
LEE, K.M., LEE, S.Y. and HUR, T., 2004. Life cycle inventory analysis – UNFCCC, 2015 [viewed 18 May 2016]. Adoption of the Paris
for electricity in Korea. Energy, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 87-101. http:// Agreement: Draft decision/CP.21 [online]. Bonn, Switzerland:
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2003.08.007. UNFCCC. Available from: https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/
MCDONOUGH, W. and BRAUNGART, M., 2002. Design for the cop21/eng/l09.pdf
triple top line: new tools for sustainable commerce. Corporate WANG, H., THAKKAR, C., CHEN, X. and MURREL, S., 2016. Life-cycle
Environmental Strategy, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 251-258. http://dx.doi. assessment of airport pavement design alternatives for energy and
org/10.1016/S1066-7938(02)00069-6. environmental impacts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 163-171.