Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Management

9(2): 258-263. http://dx.doi.org/10.29244/jpsl.9.2.258-263

E-ISSN: 2460-5824
http://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jpsl

Biodegradability of Bioplastic from Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch

Anggun Rahmana, Khaswar Syamsub, and Isroic
a
Program Study of Natural Resources and Environmental Management, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, 16680,
Indonesia
b
Department of Agroindustrial Technology, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia
c
Indonesian Research Institute for Biotechnology and Bioindustry, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia

Article Info: Abstract: Biodegradation of the bioplastic composite based on cellulose from
Received: 26 - 12 - 2017 oil palm empty fruit bunches was investigated in this study. Microbes
Accepted: 17 - 05 - 2018
consortium from landfill soil collected from top soil were used as the
inoculums for the biodegradation process. Biodeg-radation test of the
bioplastic from oil palm empty fruit bunch samples compared with
Keywords: oxodegradation and conventional plastic samples were conducted in the glass
Biodegradation, bioplastic,
natural inoculums. jar. The biodegradation rate was evaluated from CO2 generated from the
biodegradation process and absorbed by 0.1 N sodium hydroxide solutions.
Corresponding Author: The generated CO2 was titrated with 0.1 N HCl and using phenol-phthalein
Anggun Rahman (PP) followed by methyl oranges indicator. The results showed that the
Program Study of Natural
Resources and Environmental highest CO2 production on landfill soil indicating the highest rate of
Management, Bogor biodegradation was found on bioplastic from oil palm empty fruit bunch
Agricultural University, Bogor; followed by oxodegradable plastic and conventional plastic. The rate of
Email: biodegradation for bioplastic from oil palm empty fruit bunch, oxodegradable
[email protected]
plastic and conven-tional plastic were 0.067, 0.052 and 0.000 mg CO 2/day,
respectively.

How to cite (CSE Style 8th Edition):

Rahman A, Syamsu K, Isroi. 2019. Biodegradability of Bioplastic from Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch. JPSL 9(2): 258-263.
http://dx.doi.org/10.29244/jpsl.9.2.258-263.

INTRODUCTION
Plastic are widely used as packaging and many other applications and continues to increase. Plastic
packaging has several advantages, namely durable, light, inert, not rusty, thermoplastic, and able to be colored.
The amount of plastic waste is increasing year by year. Recycle and reuse of the plastic waste capacity are not
as much as increasing the plastic waste. The World production of plastics was 311 million tonnes in 2014.
Plastics demand for Asia is 16% from the total production (260 million tonnes) of plastics materials in the
world (Plastics Europe 2015). In 2014, 25.8 million tones of post-consumer plastics waste ended up in the
official waste streams; 69.2% was recovered through recycling and energy recovery processes while 30.8%
still end up to landfill. Within the different plastic applications, plastic packaging reached the highest recycling
rate (39.5%) and repre-sented more than 80% of the total recycled quantities (Plastics Europe 2015). This
statistic highlights the need for a renewable, all natural replacement for pe-troleum based plastics (DiGregorio
2009).
One of the problems of the petroleum based plastic is very difficult to be bio-degraded in nature and
causes environmental pollution (Isroi et al. 2017). Its chemical structure which is a high molecular weight and
has a strong bonding chain, makes this plastic taking a very long time to decompose in nature and become an
environmental problem such as landslides and floods. The non-degradable synthetic plastic ac-cumulates in
the environment, where they create problems for wildlife and their habitats as well as for human life. Toxic

258
Rahman A, Syamsu K, Isroi

plastic particles in soil can kill de-composer organisms, such as worms, and can result in a decrease in soil
fertility. Waste that accumulates in river can cause and interfere the river flow, so the floods occur, for human,
smoke from plastics burning waste can trigger cancer, respiratory problems, nerv-ous system disorders, and
hepatitis. In this case, actu-ally plastic waste is very dangerous for human and the environment (Singh 2015).
The effort that can be done to reduce the use of conventional plastics is through the synthesizing of
polymers (the raw material of polymer or plastic manufacture) that can be degraded by soil microbes. Bio-
degradable plastics and biobased polymer products based on renewable agricultural and biomass feedstock can
form the basis for a portfolio of sustainable, eco-efficient product and that can be broken down by microbes
(Vaverková et al. 2015).
Bioplastics are plastics that can be degraded and made from renewable materials so it must be biode-
gradable, which can include poly lactidacid, polyamide and bio-polyethylene, can be broadly described as
plastics that are derived from plant material or materials that have the ability to biodegrade into natural
components (Harding et al. 2017).
The cellulose contained in oil palm empty fruit bunch can also be an alternative raw material for bio-
plastic production. Currently, bioplastics products have been developed from oil palm empty fruit bunch (Isroi
et al., 2017). Bioplastic innovations of empty palm oil bunches certainly support Indonesia Sustain-able Palm
Oil (ISPO). ISPO is a standard system of sustainable palm oil plantations in Indonesia is eco-nomically viable,
socially acceptable and environ-mentally friendly which is compulsory in accordance with the regulations
(Septiawan et al. 2014). It also conforms to the concept Sustainable development should pay attention to 3
aspects (3P) are profit (economy), people (social) and the planet (environ-ment) (Agustina et al. 2014).
Bioplastic is designed to facilitate the degradation of enzymatic reactions of microorganisms such as
bacteria and fungi. More than 90 types of microor-ganisms including: aerobes, anaerobes, photosynthet-ic
bacteria, archaebacterial and lower eukaryotic are responsible for the biodegradation and catabolism of
bioplastics (Emadian et al. 2017). Bioplastic pro-duced through this process must be able to be proved as
biodegradable, which means it can be destroyed in certain times due to decomposition by soil microbes.
The purpose of this research is to evaluate the bio-degradability of bioplastics made from oil palm emp-
ty fruit bunch in natural environment, and compare it with biodegradability of oxodegradable plastic and
conventional plastic. The biodegradation process is done on landfill soil.

METODE PENELITIAN
Characterization of Degrading Media
Characterization of degrading media was done by measuring C-organic. Furthermore, quantification of
microorganisms was conducted by total plate count method (TPC) and pH-media measurements were
performed using pH meter. These measurements were done every day, starting from the 0th day up to the 45th
day of the biodegradation test. The total plate count method was performed to determine the amount of bacteria
present in biodegradation media. Before this process, each soil was homogenized first with aquadest at a ratio
of 1:9. Subsequently, the dilu-tion was performed. At the 4th dilution, the sample was taken as much as 0.1
mL and poured into a petri dish containing nutrient agar (NA) solid then flattened. Incubation process lasted
for 2 x 24 hours at 36.4 ᴼC and followed by counting the number of colonies of microorganisms. At the time
of pH measurement, 1 g sample was added with 5 ml of water and was ho-mogenized. Prior to pH
measurement, pH meter was standardized first using buffer pH 4.0 and 7.0. Then, measurements were made
by dipping the pH meter electrodes into the sample.
Biodegradation Test by Using Respirometry Method
The test materials used were the bioplastics made from the empty bunches of palm oil, oxodegradable
plastics and conventional plastics. The landfill soil samples taken are the top soil part which has a lot of organic
material content. The soils were spread onto 100 gram clock bottle. Each test plastic material weighs ±0.1

259
 Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam dan Lingkungan 9(2): 258-263

gram and is placed between the piles of media, so it is expected to be evenly degraded. Calcu-lation of CO2
from biodegradation can be done by using a bottle arranged into biometer which is modi-fied (Reuschenbach
et al. 2003; Zee 2011). The biometer used can be seen in figure 1 below.

Figure 1 Handmade Biometer

Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) 0.1 N with a volume of 50 mL was placed in bottle A. During the biodegrada-
tion process, the metabolic activity of microorganisms will produce CO2 flowing from bottle B (which con-
tains the test material and media) to bottle A and catch by NaOH. The amount of reacted CO2 gas can be
determined by titration with 0.1 N hydrochloric acid (HCl) solution. Measurements of CO2 gas, carried out by
two titration methods, first to use the phenol-phthalein (PP) indicator and titrated until the solution was
colorless. Next, the process is followed by a sec-ond titration using an orange methyl indicator to a pink
solution. The second titration is directly related to the CO2 gas present in NaOH solution (Syamsu et al. 2008).

RESULT AND DISCUSSION

Characterization of media was done first because environmental conditions such as medium pH, mois-
ture and temperature play a significant role in the de-gree of biodegradation of bioplastics (Emadian et al.
2017). Before the biodegradation process begins, the characterization of landfill soil showed initial pH 6.8,
with moisture content of 49.98% at a temperature of 28⁰C. At the end of the biodegradation process, there was
a change of pH to 8.22 with the same temperature at the beginning of 28 0C.
The initial conditions and after the biodegradation process did not give a considerable impact on the bio-
degradation process which is also showed in the previ-ous research related to environmental effects on bio-
degradability of plastic and paper (Oluwatosin et al. 2014). Organic carbon (OC) and nitrogen (N) is carbon
and energy source that is important because of its association with nutrients and the beneficial contribu-tion to
create all soil properties. The total values of OC and N greatly affect the fertility level of the soil. OC and N
total on top soil of landfill soil were 9.57% and 1.91%. According to the criteria for assessing soil qual-ity and
interpreting soil test results, the value was very high and marginal respectively (GWRDC 2014). It means
landfill soil was good for biodegradation process for this research.

Table 1 Quantification of Microorganisms at day 0

Sample Total Colony at day-0 (Colony/mL)
Blank media landfill soil as initial 21.3 x 105
Media containing landfill soil with bioplastic 21.3 x 105
Media containing landfill soil with oxodegradable plastic 21.3 x 105
Media containing landfill soil with conventional plastic 21.3 x 105

260
Rahman A, Syamsu K, Isroi

Table 2 Quantification of Microorganisms at day 45

Sample Total Colony at day-45 (Colony/mL)
Blank media landfill soil as initial 5.8 x 106
Media containing landfill soil with bioplastic 13.3 x 106
Media containing landfill soil with oxodegradable plastic 7.5 x 106
Media containing landfill soil with conventional plastic 4.5 x 106

The number of microorganisms at day-0 is shown at table 1 and at day-45th is shown at table 2. The total
plate count method is performed to determine the amount of bacteria present in biodegradation media. The
number of microorganisms from day-0 to 45th days increased, especially on media with bioplastic and
oxodegradable plastic. Increasing number of microorganisms may be due to the existing nutrients in soil, and
the material from bioplastics and oxodegradable plastic which become nutrients and food sources for
microorganisms.
On the other hand, the number of microorganisms in media with conventional plastic and blank media
without plastic, increased at a slower rate. The microorganisms might consume only the existing nutrients in
soil since conventional plastics are mainly produced from petrol chemical elements, which do not decompose,
thus resulting in environmental pollution (Singh 2015).
Figure 2 shows cumulative carbon dioxide produced (after corrected by control) by microorganisms
degrading bioplastics made from oil palm empty fruit bunch, oxodegradable plastic and conventional plastic
namely, 3.63 mg, 2.86 mg and 0.00 mg, respectively. The highest CO2 is produced in landfill soil containing
bioplastics from oil palm empty fruit bunch, followed by landfill soil containing oxodegradable plastic. The
CO2 produced by degradation of conventional plastic is more or less the same with the CO 2 produced in the
control (landfill soil without plastics), implying that the conventional plastics are not degraded by soil
microorganisms.

Figure 2 Cumulative CO2 production by various types of plastics in Landfill soil

Figure 2 also shows Cumulative CO2 production by various types of plastics in landfill soil in which it
increases with increasing the time especially for bioplastic and oxodegradable plastic. Microorganisms
decompose bioplastic from oil palm fruit bunch and oxodegradable plactic under anaerobic conditions and
utilize the products of degradation as the energy and carbon source. It also stated in previous research on
bioplastic degradation in natural reservoirs differing in ecological parameters using polyhydroxyalkanoates
(PHAs) (Voinova et al. 2007).
Biodegradable materials such as oil palm fruit bunch and cassava starch are those that can be consumed
by microorganisms whereas biodegradability of a material refers to the ability of that material to be
decomposed by biological agents, especially bacteria (GWRDC 2014), cellulose and starch are food and
nutrient sources for microorganisms, microbes that may break the complex molecular structure of plastics so
that they can degrade and produces CO2.

261
 Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam dan Lingkungan 9(2): 258-263

Table 3 shows rate of biodegradable in landfill soil (mg CO2/day) by using linear regression analysis. The
rate of carbon dioxide produced by bioplastics made from oil palm empty fruit bunch, oxodegradable plastic
and conventional plastic were 0.067mg CO2/day, 0.052 mg CO2/day and 0.000 mg CO2/day, respectively.
Table 3 Rate of biodegradable in landfill soil (mg CO2/day)
Plastics Rate of biodegradable in landfill soil (mg CO2/day)
Bioplastic 0.067
Oxodegradable plastic 0.052
Conventional plastic 0.000

Bioplastic products based on renewable agricultural and biomass feedstock can form the basis of
sustainability, eco-efficient products. Respect of the environment is the most important and a special concern
in a sustainable development context. We should act in this way to preserve fossil resources and reduce the
pollution of the Earth.

CONCLUSION
In conclusion, it was shown that the highest CO2 production and the highest rate of biodegradation on
landfill soil was found on bioplastic from oil palm empty fruit bunch followed by oxodegradable plastic and
conventional plastic. The rates of biodegradation for bioplastic from oil palm empty fruit bunch, oxo-
degradable plastic and conventional plastic were 0.067, 0.052 and 0.000 mg CO2/day, respectively.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank to Indonesian Research Insti-tute for Biotechnology and Bioindustry, Indonesia and
also thanks to Miar Trikanthi, Inten Sudiah, Vannida Masrilah Ahmad, Nurul Setiawati for their contribution
in laboratory work.

REFERENCES
[GWRDC] The Grape and Wine Research and Development Corporation, 2014. Assessing Soil Quality and
Interpreting Soil Test Results. Sustainable Agriculture. (3):1–8.
Agustina D, Hariyadi, Saharuddin. 2014. Socio-Economic Environmental Analysis of Sustainable Palm Oil
Plantation Based on ISPO PT. Tapian Nadenggan. Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental
Management. 4(1):43-48.
DiGregorio BE. 2009. Biobased Performance Bioplastic: Mirel. Chemistry and Biology. 16(1):1–2.
Emadian SM, Onay TT, Demirel B. 2017. Biodegradation of Bioplastics in Natural Environments. Waste
Management. 59:526–36.
Harding KGT, Gounden, Pretorius S. 2017. Biodegradable Plastics: A Myth of Marketing. Procedia
Manufacturing. 7:106–10.
Isroi A, Cifriadi, T. Panji, N.A Wibowo, K. Syamsu, 2017. Bioplastic Production from Cellulose of Oil Palm
Empty Fruit Bunch. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 65: 12011.
Oluwatosin OO, Alo, Moses N, Ugah, Uchenna IU, Albert MO. 2014. Environmental Effect on
Biodegradability of Plastic and Paper Bags IOSR. Journal Of Environmental Science, Toxicology And
Food Technology. 8(1):22–29.
Plastics Europe. 2015. Plastics - the Facts 2014/2015: An Analysis of European Plastics Production, Demand
and Waste Data. PlasticsEurope. 1–34.
Reuschenbach P, Pagga U, Strotmann U. 2003. A Critical Comparison of Respirometric Biodegradation Tests
Based on OECD 301 and Related Test Methods. Water Research. 37(7):1571–82.

262
Rahman A, Syamsu K, Isroi

Septiawan H, Hariadi, Thohari M. 2014. Analysis of Environmental Management Palm Oil Mill Batu Ampar
– PT SMART Tbk in the Implementation of Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil. Journal of Natural
Resources and Environmental Managemen). 4(2):136-144
Singh RV. 2015. Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB): Biodegradable, Bioplastics Produced by Microorganisms.
International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 7(2):17–23.
Syamsu K, Setyowati K, Khoiri AA. 2008. The Effect of Plastisizer Additions (Polyethylene Glycol 400 and
Dimethyl Phtalate) on the Biodegradation Process of Bioplastics Poly-B-Hydroxyalkanoat in Liquid
Media with Limited Air. Jurnal Teknologi Pertanian. 4(1): 4–14.
Vaverková, MD, Adamcová D. 2015. Biodegrability of Bioplastic Materials in a Controlled Composting
Environment. Journal of Ecological Engineering. 16(3):155–60.
Voinova, ON, Kozhevnikova NA, Gladyshev MI, Volova TG. 2007. Bioplastic Degradation in Natural
Reservoirs Differing in Ecological Parameters. Doklady Biological Sciences. 417(1):426–28.
Zee MVD. 2011. Analytical Methods for Monitoring Biodegradation Processes of Environmentally
Degradable Polymers. Handbook of Biodegradable Polymers: Isolation, Synthesis, Characterization
and Applications. 263–81

263