Complaint For Damages and Injunctive Relief 7.27.20
Complaint For Damages and Injunctive Relief 7.27.20
Complaint For Damages and Injunctive Relief 7.27.20
STATE OF GEORGIA
VS
COME the Plaintiffs, MARTIN N. BELL and the LT. GEN. JAMES LONGSTREET CHAPTER of
the MILITARY ORDER OF THE STARS AND BARS GEORGIA SOCIETY INC., (“Plaintiffs”), by and
through the undersigned attorney, and hereby propound upon the City of Macon-Bibb County
Commissioners of Bibb County, Georgia (collectively “Defendants Plaintiff’s Complaint for
Damages and Injunctive Relief (“Complaint”), showing to this Honorable Court the following:
I. INTRODUCTION
1. Plaintiffs are suing Defendants for attempting to remove and or removing the monuments
to Bibb County soldiers and citizens of the State of Georgia who served the State of Georgia
during the war of 1861-65 ( hereinafter “ the Monuments”) in violation of O.C.G.A. § 50-3-
1(b)(4).
2. The first such monument, the “Soldier Monument” stands on a small triangle of land at
the intersection of Cotton Avenue and Second Street; the second such monument, “Women’s
Monument”, stands on the land island on Popular St. near city hall in downtown Macon.
3. Defendants did on the 21st of July, 2020, vote to “move” the Monuments to “somewhere”
designed for political purposes to placate the mob mentalities current in American society and is
contrary to the very plans for improvement of the said triangle of land which has been proposed
and/or adopted by Defendants before the current hysterias began during recent months.
II. PARTIES
“Military Order of the Stars and Bars, Georgia Society Inc.”, a Georgia non-profit corporation
under the laws of the State of Georgia whose purpose is the preservation of monuments and
memories of the men and women of Georgia who served this State during the war of 1861-65.
Plaintiff Bell is also the Commander of Plaintiff LT. GEN. JAMES LONGSTREET CHAPTER of the
6. Plaintiffs have standing to bring this Complaint, pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 50-3-1(b)(5) and
7. The Defendant consolidated government of the County of Bibb and the City of Macon,
Macon and is charged with the execution of the edicts and rules of Defendant Macon and is
legally bound to respect and obey the laws of the State of Georgia insofar as they are applicable
to Macon.
9. Defendants Al Tillman, Larry Schlesinger, Elaine Lucas, Bert Bivins III, and Virgil
Watkins Jr., hereinafter “Defendant Commissioners” are those Commissioners of Macon who
voted to move the Monuments from downtown Macon and who are obliged to respect at all
times the laws of the State of Georgia insofar as they are applicable to Macon.
2
III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
10. This Court enjoys subject matter jurisdiction for the instant civil action pursuant to
11. This Court enjoys personal jurisdiction over Defendants because the City of Macon-Bibb,
Georgia, is a municipality existing by the law of the State of Georgia, and because Bibb County
12. Venue is proper with this Court because the original injuries occurred in Macon-Bibb, the
case at bar seeks injunctive relief, and one or more Defendants are residents of Macon and/or
13. The “Soldier Monument” has been located in downtown Macon since 1879. Said
monument is a memorial to the hundreds of Bibb Countians who fought on behalf of their
homes, their families, the Confederate States of America, and the State of Georgia.
14. At considerable expense and from funds collected by private subscriptions, the people
of Bibb County and their friends and supporters, and with permission of the City of Macon
erected the Soldier Monument in 1879. It was later moved (1956) to its present location of honor
at the intersection of Cotton Avenue and Second Street. The “Women’s Monument” was set in
June of 1911 on the corner of Poplar St. and near the intersection of First Street.
15. Georgia’s participation in the war of 1861-1865 (known variously as The War for
Southern Independence, The War Between the States, and the American Civil War, said conflict
hereinafter named “the War”) was lawfully carried out pursuant to the General Assembly’s
passage of the Ordinance of Secession on January 19, 1861. The War was fought by the states of
the Confederacy in an attempt to make good their secession from the United States of America.
3
16. During the War men of Bibb County volunteered and were subject to conscription in
accord with laws adopted by the Confederate States of America’s government which were
17. Some black and mixed-race Bibb Countians fought for Georgia and Bibb County in the
two battles that took place in Bibb County during the War, (the two battles of Dunlap Farm at
Ocmulgee Mounds). Neither of the Monuments discriminate by race among those its establishers
sought to honor.
18. By allowing the Monuments to be erected on their original location and then on their
present location, the City of Macon entered into a binding easement with the parties who erected
them and their posterity, to wit, that creature of law known as “ a license coupled with an
interest”.
19. In the years following the erection of the Monuments, Plaintiffs and various predecessors
have held ceremonies at the Monuments and have cared for and improved their settings. All
such ceremonies and improvements have been carried out with the permission of the City of
Macon.
20. Plaintiff Martin Bell personally paid $498.00 to repair lighting for the “Soldier
Monument” in April of 2018. The City of Macon installed the lights but has allowed them to be
21. In addition to the foregoing, Defendants have recently let an unruly mob of unidentified
“protestors” obscure and denigrate the Monuments in violation of O.C.G.A. 50-3-1 (b)(2)-(4).
22. Plaintiffs and all those thousands of people who sympathize with them and revere the
maintenance of all American historical markers have suffered injury to their rights and dignity.
4
V. CAUSES OF ACTION
COUNT I
STATUTORY VIOLATION OF O.C.G.A. § 50-3-1(B)(4)
23. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference as if each is fully set forth herein all prior paragraphs
of this Complaint.
24. Defendants, without authority, unlawfully allowed the obscuring of the Monuments.
More specifically, Defendant Mayor allowed or directed the erection of plywood walls around
the Soldier Monument and thereafter conspired with others to get “protestors” to obtain a
“permit” from Macon to have such barrier continued and to paint insulting graffiti thereon and to
issue an alleged “Executive Order” allowing, if not encouraging such paintings of the barrier.
Defendant Mayor countersigned a permit which called the paintings “art”. Included in such “art”
25. The Monuments constitute monuments, markers, and memorials that honor the women
of Bibb County and the men of Bibb County and the State of Georgia who served the State of
27. The Monuments co-owners are the several and individual citizens of Bibb County,
Georgia who were not given proper legal notice, consulted, or given any opportunity to decide
28. Plaintiffs and the people of Bibb County will suffered irreparable injury or damages as a
result of Defendants’ removing the Monuments to a place of lesser honor, if, indeed, Defendants
5
It shall be unlawful for any person * * * or other entity acting without authority to
* * * remove, conceal, or obscure any privately owned monument, plaque,
marker, or memorial which is dedicated to, honors, or recounts the military
service of any past * * * military personnel of * * * the Confederate States of
America[.] Any person or entity who suffers injury or damages as a result of a
violation of this paragraph may bring an action individually or in a representative
capacity against the person or persons committing such violations to seek
injunctive relief and to recover general and exemplary damages sustained as a
result of such person’s or persons’ unlawful actions.
30. Defendants are liable to Plaintiffs for general damages, including treble the amount of the
full cost of repair or replacement of the removed Monuments and their lighting accessories; for
exemplary damages for the unauthorized removal of the monuments in a manner contrary to law,
including punitive damages for the purpose of deterring Defendants and similarly situated state
actors from engaging in such conduct in the future; and for attorneys’ fees and court costs
expending by Plaintiffs in this proceeding, all due to Defendants having injured Plaintiffs by
violating O.C.G.A. § 50-3-1(b)(4), and all in amounts to be proven with greater specificity at
trial.
31. The Court can and should award Plaintiff injunctive relief by ordering Defendants to
leave the Monuments and the triangle of land and other lands upon which they set alone except
to beautify such places or allow Plaintiffs to do so, to protect them from mobs and vandals, and
A. Award Plaintiff a money judgment against Defendants for general damages, exemplary
damages, attorneys’ fees, and court costs, all in amounts to be determined by the
factfinder; and
B. Award Plaintiffs injunctive relief against Defendants, whereby Defendants are ordered to
permit Plaintiffs to beautify the said triangle of land and the land immediately around the
6
Women’s Monument, replace and repair such parts of the Monuments as may be in
disrepair or that have been defaced by vandals, and restore the lighting of the “Soldier
COUNT II
FIRST AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT VIOLATIONS
42 U.S.C. § 1983
32. Plaintiff incorporates by reference as if each is fully set forth herein all prior paragraphs
of this Complaint.
33. Plaintiffs are guaranteed the right to free speech and equal protection before the laws
pursuant to the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.
34. Defendants violated Plaintiffs’ right to free speech by voting to prohibit Plaintiffs from
preserving their and the people of Bibb County’s heritage by tending to the Monuments in their
present places of honor. Said violation constitutes unconstitutional viewpoint- and/or content-
based discrimination.
35. Defendants acted under the color of state law when Defendants prohibited Plaintiffs from
maintaining the people of Bibb County’s Monuments at their current places of honor.
36. Defendants do not enjoy qualified immunity insofar as Defendants knowingly violated
clearly established law when Defendants engaged in unconstitutional viewpoint- and/or content-
based discrimination and have denied Defendants the Equal Protections to which they are
entitled..
37. Due directly and proximately to Defendants having violated Plaintiffs’ right to free
speech and equal protection, Plaintiffs have suffered and will continue to suffer damages.
7
A. Award Plaintiff a money judgment against Defendants for general and punitive damages,
B. Award Plaintiff all attorneys’ fees Plaintiff incurs in relation to the instant civil action
C. Award Plaintiffs injunctive relief against Defendants, whereby Defendants are ordered to
permit Plaintiffs to tend the Monuments at their present location and to beautify the
COUNT III
BREACH OF CONTRACT AND DETRIMENTAL RELIANCE
38. Plaintiff Martin Bell incorporates by reference as if each is fully set forth herein all prior
39. Plaintiff Bell made an agreement with Defendants to bear part of the expense of restoring
the lighting of the Soldier Monument. In fulfillment of his obligations Plaintiff Bell paid
$498.60 to Meyer Electric Supply. Plaintiff Bell has fulfilled all his contractual
obligations to Macon. The new lights were installed and turned on by April 13, 2018.
40. Macon has failed to fulfill its contractual obligations to Plaintiff, to wit: maintaining the
41. Plaintiff has sustained damages as a result of Macon’s failure to fulfill Macon’s
42. During the negotiating process and following the formation of the contract, Plaintiff
reasonably and to his detriment relied in good faith upon Macon’s representations that
Macon would abide by the terms of the parties’ agreement, and Plaintiff expended labor
8
43. As a result of his detrimental reliance in good faith upon Macon’s representations during
the negotiating process and after the contract formation, Plaintiff has been damaged in
44. Because Defendants have acted in bad faith, and have caused Plaintiff unnecessary
litigation, including but not limited to attorneys’ fees, as part of the damages, pursuant to
O.C.G.A. § 13-6-11.
45.
A. Award Plaintiff a money judgment against Defendants for breach of contract and
B. Award Plaintiff all attorneys’ fees and expenses of litigation Plaintiff incurs in
COUNT IV
INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
46. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference as if each is fully set forth herein all prior paragraphs
of this Complaint.
47. Plaintiffs show that the “Soldier Monument” is made out of Italian marble and has
already suffered some of the ravages of time and shows some signs of cracking at its base
48. Plaintiffs show that even if due care is taken, the Monument may be greatly damaged if
9
49. Plaintiff’s show that if the Monuments are moved to an out-of-the-way place of lesser
honor Plaintiffs and the people of Bibb County will suffer irreparable harm, and further
show that part of the harm that the citizens of Bibb County will suffer should the
monuments be moved will be that henceforth they will be deemed a fickle, cowardly, and
irresolute people supinely or timorously swaying before the passions of the day and the
50. Plaintiffs are entitled to immediate interlocutory relief in the form of a preliminary
thereof.
51. Plaintiffs are entitled to recover from Defendants expenses of litigation, including but not
A. Award Plaintiff a money judgment against Defendants for breach of contract and
B. Award Plaintiff all attorneys’ fees and expenses of litigation Plaintiff incurs in
COUNT V
UNJUST ENRICHMENT
52. Plaintiff Lt. General James Longstreet Chapter shows that the City of Macon required it
to pay permit fees and liability insurance fees totaling $677.00 for memorial events held
at the Monument during 2016, 2017 and 2018 but has not charged any such fees for so-
called “protests” and the recent “art event” aforementioned at the Monuments. Such
10
actions on the part of Defendants have been based upon racially-motivated, content-
53. Plaintiffs are entitled to recover any fees and “insurance” payments they paid to or
through the Defendants, and to recover General Damages and Punitive Damages from
A. Award Plaintiff a money judgment against Defendants for unjust enrichment and for
B. Award Plaintiff all attorneys’ fees and expenses of litigation Plaintiff incurs in relation to
Walker Chandler
Attorney for Plaintiff
101 Gleneagle Point
Peachtree City, GA 30269
[email protected]
Georgia Bar No. 120675
Verification
COMES NOW Martin Bell who being duly put upon oath deposes and says that to the best of
his information and belief the facts set forth in the above Complaint are true, this 27th day of
July, 2020.
________________________________________________.
Martin Bell
Sworn to and subscribed before me the day and year above written.
11