Executive Summary: "Effect of Uncertainty On Objectives", and An Effect Is A Positive or
Executive Summary: "Effect of Uncertainty On Objectives", and An Effect Is A Positive or
Executive Summary: "Effect of Uncertainty On Objectives", and An Effect Is A Positive or
ISO 31000 2018 was published in February of 2018 and is the second
edition of this ISO standard. It cancels and replaces the ISO 31000 2009
standard which is now obsolete. It was updated in order to streamline
the content and in order to respond to changing stakeholder needs
and expectations.
ISO 31000 2018 defines a set of guidelines. They are referred to
as guidelines because they’re voluntary. They’re not requirements.
They’re suggestions only. These suggestions or guidelines are
discussed in the following sections:
DEFINITION OF RISK
While ISO 31000 defines risk in a new and unusual way, the old and
the new definitions are largely compatible. Both definitions talk about
the same phenomena but from two different perspectives. ISO thinks of
risk in goal-oriented terms while the traditional definition thinks of risk in
event-oriented terms. These two definitions can and do co-exist. They’re
simply two different ways of talking about the same phenomena.
ISO 31000 can be applied to the achievement of any and all types
of objectives at all levels and in all areas. It can be used at a strategic
level to help make decisions and can be applied to all kinds of activities.
It can be used to help manage and control processes, operations,
functions, projects, programs, products, services, and assets.
However, exactly how you apply ISO 31000 is up to you and will
depend on your organization’s needs, objectives, and challenges,
and should reflect what it does and how it operates.
Consequence
Context
Control
Event
Events always have causes and usually have consequences. Events without
consequences are referred to as near-misses, near-hits, close-calls, or incidents.
External context
Internal context
Common level of risk categories include the following: extreme risk, high risk,
moderate risk, and low risk. Of course, you need to define each category so that
everyone is using the same terminology in the same way.
Likelihood
Monitoring
Residual risk
Residual risk is the risk left over after you’ve implemented a risk treatment
option. It’s the risk remaining after you’ve reduced the risk, removed the source
of the risk, modified the consequences, changed the probabilities, transferred
the risk, or retained the risk.
Review
In general, ISO 31000 2018 expects you to review your risk management
framework and your risk management process. It specifically expects you
to review your risk management policy and plans as well as your risks, risk
criteria, risk treatments, risk management controls, residual risks, and your
risk assessment process.
Risk
While ISO 31000 defines risk in a new and unusual way, the old and
the new definitions are largely compatible. Both definitions talk about
the same phenomena but from two different perspectives. ISO thinks of
risk in goal-oriented terms while the traditional definition thinks of risk
in event-oriented terms. These two definitions can and do co-exist.
They’re two different ways of talking about the same phenomena.
Risk analysis
Risk analysis is a process that is used to understand the nature, sources,
and causes of the risks that you have identified and to estimate the level of
risk. It is also used to study impacts and consequences and to examine the
controls that currently exist. How detailed your risk analysis ought to be
will depend upon the risk, the purpose of the analysis, the information
you have, and the resources available.
Risk assessment
Risk attitude
Risk criteria
Risk criteria are terms of reference and are used to evaluate the significance
or importance of your organization’s risks. They are used to determine whether
a specified level of risk is acceptable or tolerable. Risk criteria should reflect your
organization’s values, policies, and objectives, should be based on its external
and internal context, should consider the views of stakeholders, and should
be derived from standards, laws, policies, and other requirements.
Risk evaluation
Risk identification
Risk management
Risk owner
A risk owner is a person or entity that has been given the authority
to manage a particular risk and is accountable for doing so.
Risk profile
Risk source
A risk source has the intrinsic potential to give rise to risk. A risk source
is where a risk originates. It’s where it comes from. Potential sources of risk
include at least the following: commercial relationships and obligations, legal
expectations and liabilities, economic shifts and circumstances, technological
innovations and upheavals, political changes and trends, natural events and
forces, human frailties and tendencies, and management shortcomings and
excesses. All of these things could generate a risk that must be managed.
Risk treatment
You have many treatment options. You can avoid the risk, you can
reduce the risk, you can remove the source of the risk, you can modify
the consequences, you can change the probabilities, you can share the
risk with others, you can simply retain the risk, or you can even increase
the risk in order to pursue an opportunity.
Stakeholder
A stakeholder is a person or an organization that can affect or be affected
by a decision or an activity. Stakeholders also include those who have the
perception that a decision or an activity can affect them. ISO 31000 2018
distinguishes between external and internal stakeholders.
Thanks to Google.