Running Head: Leadership Survey and Analysis 1
Running Head: Leadership Survey and Analysis 1
Running Head: Leadership Survey and Analysis 1
Professor
Date
LEADERSHIP SURVEY AND ANALYSIS 2
Leadership in this day and age is not about the title, presentations, or positions. It is
about the influence you have on your employees. To know how you are viewed as a leader, it is
crucial to comprehend your management style, how employees see you and listen to all
employees’ ideas. In this paper, I will be discussing the Participative leadership, its meaning, the
research behind it, the pros and cons associated to this kind of leadership style besides discussing
You might ask why is this a great leadership style, and why do we need this type?
experiencing low job satisfaction due to lack of face-to-face interaction leading to stress,
miscommunication, and role confusion. Dissatisfaction among virtual teams has increased
turnover and management costs for organizations. Despite these known associations, there was a
gap in the literature investigating efficient leadership practices to improve job satisfaction for
highly skilled virtual teams. Participative leadership offers an effective approach to increase job
satisfaction among face-to-face teams and innovative teams, (Reidel, E., 2016, p. 4)”.
Participative leadership is a managerial style that takes the opinions of employees to help
make many decisions for the company. Even, though this can be a slower type of management
style to gather the information to make the decision, it also helps boost morale and has
employees feel like they have a say and their opinion matters. With this type of management
style, there are many pros and some cons to this type of management style. This helps
predictions of human behavior, and how they reacted with different management styles and ways
According to the Harvard Business Review, “during the past decade, vast numbers of
executives have been schooled in the virtues of participative leadership. Perhaps no other
LEADERSHIP SURVEY AND ANALYSIS 3
company training programs, and the general press. Educators, in particular, have consistently
critics of big business have also added fuel to the fire, contending that industrial organizations
Within organizations employees having a say in what their opinions/ company issues.
This then will allow the organization to come up with solutions and let the employees be
involved in the decision-making process for the organization. Participative allows employees to
have their creativity to enable them to develop a stronger work environment to be more
organization to being green. Some are good to have, but having more experience or product
knowledge is essential. By having employees with high performance, you can increase
employees pay, which is a great way to increase employee retention — also allowing employees
to be active leaders in the growth and decision making of the company’s future success.
There are many positives to this type of leadership, but there are some negative views to
this as well. One of the negative aspects of management should be able to decide how they want
to run the business without the input of others. As well as the time it can take to get the input of
all employees in the office, by creating a survey or setting up one on ones with them.
Conflicts within employees can also arise from participative leadership whenever there
are multiple discussions with different opinions from employees that are highly opinionated
workers. They can also feel if the manager goes in a different direction that their opinion is not
LEADERSHIP SURVEY AND ANALYSIS 4
valued within the organization. Which then can lead the employee to want to change jobs to be
looked at being more valued within a company. But it's hard in a sense you truly can’t please
everyone.
According to Chron Small Business, they also talk about diluted expertise stating, A
democratic approach can also dilute the quality of expertise involved in a decision-making
process. If you have the best strategic planning abilities and knowledge in your small business,
taking on input from less experienced workers can dilute the quality of perspectives. In
marketing, a marketing manager that allows entry-level coordinators and specialists to have
strong voices in critical strategy decisions may take away from the strength of her own
experience and abilities” (Kokemuller, N., 2016, pg. 1). This shows that taking away from
management skill sets and allowing them to make their own decisions.
From my findings, this is the approach I would take when I become a manager in the
future. Valuing the opinions of people, one is working with because for one to be successful, he
or she has to calibrate with ideas of one another. Every manager is going to have their style, not
all you are going to like, but you must learn to adapt to the different styles. It never hurts to offer
Within 3M (Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing) good leadership is significant for its
growth. Being a large organization, it needs to make sure that they retain employees and help
develop them to continue growing within the organization. Also making sure that their opinion
counts.
A little background on 3M, it started in Northern Minnesota that started with abrasives.
Has now turned into a global powerhouse, with products that are improving lives daily with
people around the world. 3M has operations within 70 countries with sales in 200. 3M has five
big business Industrial; Safety and Graphics; Health Care, and Consumer. With over 60,000
products that are used within homes and business every single day. It is hiring 72,000 employees
For this project, I was able to survey our team of inside sales employees across
Separation Purification Sciences Division. They are focusing on growth within 3M, job
expectations and understanding what expected of them, and thoughts of our Management team.
This survey focuses on the participative leadership model, seeing their ideas on if they believe
I was able to survey 13 of our 15 employees within our inside sales team. The survey
The results of this survey, for the most part, was favorable. The lowest rating was
metrics measured align with activities that drive growth, which can be explained by them
recently just had an increase in metrics for a number of outbound calls, and the number of
opportunities entered in a month. This was an example of change decided by Management which
they didn’t ask suggestion from employees due to this they received negative thoughts from this.
The second lowest segment was I see myself working in Insides Sales one year from now.
I think it is good to have a score like this; it shows people want to continue to move up and
change rolls. Also, they could not be at their two-year mark in a year where they even have the
The highest attribute was I have a good friend at work. I think this is a strong one to
have; it’s important for employees to have someone who they can trust and be able to have lunch
with or just go take a lap around our quad with. Having friendship with employees keep the job
Overall the Manager of the inside sales team for SPSD scored an 8.9 out of 10. To how I
look at things that is a strong score. From showing an 8.7 showing that my opinion counts are a
strong score overall. It means this manager cares about their employees, to get feedback.
LEADERSHIP SURVEY AND ANALYSIS 7
Especially in the sales world, you need strong management to encourage to keep exceeding
expectations. My suggestion for this manager is to look where he scored 3,4 and 5s. Create was
to make it fun at work, by do sales competitions, or having group lunches from time to time.
References
LEADERSHIP SURVEY AND ANALYSIS 8
Greiner, L. E. (2014, August 01). What Managers Think of Participative Leadership. Retrieved
leadership>
style-management-77537.html>
Riedel, E. (2016, June 03). The Effects of Participative Leadership Practices on Job Satisfaction
<https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3485&context=dissertati
ons>
Malik, & Hayyat, S. (1970, January 01). A study relationship between leader behaviors and
<https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/188064>
3m/history/>