SanPablo V Pantranco - DIGESTED

153 SCRA 199
SAN PABLO vs. PANTRANCO

FACTS
PANTRANCO is a domestic corporation engaged in the land transportation business
with PUB service for passengers and freight and various certificates for public
conveniences (CPC) to operate passenger buses from Metro Manila to Bicol Region
and Eastern Samar. PANTRANCO through its counsel, wrote to Maritime Industry
Authority (MARINA) requesting authority to lease/purchase a vessel named MN
"Black Double" and "to be used for its project to operate a ferryboat service from
Matnog, Sorsogon and Allen, Samar that will provide service to company buses and
freight trucks that have to cross San Bernardo Strait.
MARINA said that it cannot give due course to the request, because there was
already an inter-island shipping company operating their desired route. MARINA
policies on interisland shipping restrict the entry of new operators which are
adequately serviced by existing/authorized operators. Market conditions in the
proposed route cannot support the entry of additional tonnage.
PANTRANCO nevertheless acquired the vessel MN "Black Double." It wrote the
Chairman of the Board of Transportation (BOT) through its counsel that it proposes
to operate a ferry service to carry its passenger buses and freight trucks between
Allen and Matnog in connection with its trips to Tacloban City. PANTRANCO claims
that it can operate a ferry service in connection with its franchise for bus operation
in the highway from Pasay City to Tacloban City "for the purpose of continuing the
highway, which is interrupted by a small body of water, the said proposed ferry
operation is merely a necessary and incidental service to its main service and
obligation of transporting its passengers from Pasay City to Tacloban City. Such
being the case, PHILTRANCO attest that there is no need to obtain a separate
certificate for public convenience to operate a ferry service between Allen and
Matnog to cater exclusively to its passenger buses and freight trucks.
Without awaiting action on its request, PANTRANCO started to operate said ferry
service. BOT then ordered PANTRANCO not to operate its vessel until the application
for a hearing. Further, in another order, BOT enjoined PANTRANCO from operating
the MN "Black Double" otherwise it will be cited to show cause why its CPC should
not be suspended or the pending application denied.
San Pablo and Cardinal Shipping Corporation who are then franchise holders of the
ferry service interposed their opposition. They claim they adequately service the
PANTRANCO by ferrying its buses, trucks and passengers.
BOT then asked the legal opinion from the Minister of Justice whether or not a bus
company with an existing CPC between Pasay City and Tacloban City may still be
required to secure another certificate in order to operate a ferry service between
two terminals of a small body of water. The then Minister of Justice, Ricardo Puno,
rendered an opinion to the effect that there is no need for bus operators to secure a
separate CPC to operate a ferryboat service. Thus, the BOT rendered its decision
holding that the ferryboat service is part of its CPC to operate from Pasay to
Samar/Leyte by amending PANTRANCO's CPC so as to reflect the same.
Cardinal Shipping Corporation and the heirs of San Pablo filed separate motions for
reconsideration of said decision and San Pablo filed a supplemental motion for
reconsideration which were subsequently denied by the BOT.
ISSUE:
Whether or not the sea can be considered as a continuation of the highway.
Whether or not PANTRANCO should be granted to extend their certificates for public
convenience beyond its operation bounds.
HELD:
Open sea is not a continuation of highway.
Considering the distance between MATNOG and ALLEN (20km), the conveyance of
passengers, trucks and cargo from Matnog to Allen is certainly not a ferry boat
service but a coastwise or interisland shipping service.
Under no circumstance can the sea between Matnog and Allen be considered a
continuation of the highway. While a ferry boat service has been considered as a
continuation of the highway when crossing rivers or even lakes, which are small
body of waters - separating the land, however, when as in this case the two
terminals, Matnog and Allen are separated by an open sea. Thus, it cannot be
considered as a continuation of the highway.
Separate certificate of public convenience must be secured
Respondent PANTRANCO should secure a separate CPC for the operation of an
interisland or coastwise shipping service in accordance with the provisions of law. Its
CPC as a bus transportation cannot be merely amended to include this water
service under the guise that it is a mere private ferry service.
The Court holds that the water transport service between Matnog and Allen is not a
ferry boat service but a coastwise or interisland shipping service. Before private
respondent may be issued a franchise or CPC for the operation of the said service as
a common carrier, it must comply with the usual requirements of filing an
application, payment of the fees, publication, adducing evidence at a hearing and
affording the oppositors the opportunity to be heard, among others, as provided by
law.
Petitions GRANTED PANTRANCO permanently enjoined from operating the ferryboat
service and/or coastwise/interisland services between Matnog and Allen until it shall
have secured the appropriate Certificate of Public Convenience (CPC) in accordance
with the requirements of the law.

SanPablo V Pantranco - DIGESTED

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SanPablo V Pantranco - DIGESTED

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

SanPablo V Pantranco - DIGESTED

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

153 SCRA 199

SAN PABLO vs. PANTRANCO

You might also like