SQL: Foreign Key

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Foreign key

1
Foreign key
In the context of relational databases, a foreign key is a field (or collection of fields) in one table that uniquely
identifies a row of another table. In other words, a foreign key is a column or a combination of columns that is used
to establish and enforce a link between two tables.
The table containing the foreign key is called the referencing or child table, and the table containing the candidate
key is called the referenced or parent table.
Since the purpose of the foreign key is to identify a particular row of the referenced table, it is generally required that
the foreign key is equal to the candidate key in some row of the primary table, or else have no value (the NULL
value.). This rule is called a referential integrity constraint between the two tables. Because violations of these
constraints can be the source of many database problems, most database management systems provide mechanisms
to ensure that every non-null foreign key corresponds to a row of the referenced table.
For example, consider a database with two tables: a CUSTOMER table that includes all customer data and an
ORDER table that includes all customer orders. Suppose the business requires that each order must refer to a single
customer. To reflect this in the database, a foreign key column is added to the ORDER table (e.g., CUSTOMERID),
which references the primary key of CUSTOMER (e.g. ID). Because the primary key of a table must be unique, and
because CUSTOMERID only contains values from that primary key field, we may assume that, when it has a value,
CUSTOMERID will identify the particular customer which placed the order. However, this can no longer be
assumed if the ORDER table is not kept up to date when rows of the CUSTOMER table are deleted or the ID
column altered, and working with these tables may become more difficult. Many real world databases work around
this problem by 'inactivating' rather than physically deleting master table foreign keys, or by complex update
programs that modify all references to a foreign key when a change is needed.
Foreign keys play an essential role in database design. One important part of database design is making sure that
relationships between real-world entities are reflected in the database by references, using foreign keys to refer from
one table to another. Another important part of database design is database normalization, in which tables are broken
apart and foreign keys make it possible for them to be reconstructed.
Multiple rows in the referencing (or child) table may refer to the same row in the referenced (or parent) table. In this
case, the relationship between the two tables is called a one to many relationship between the referenced table and
the referencing table.
In addition, the child and parent table may, in fact, be the same table, i.e. the foreign key refers back to the same
table. Such a foreign key is known in SQL:2003 as a self-referencing or recursive foreign key. In database
management systems, this is often accomplished by linking a first and second reference to the same table.
A table may have multiple foreign keys, and each foreign key can have a different parent table. Each foreign key is
enforced independently by the database system. Therefore, cascading relationships between tables can be established
using foreign keys.
Defining foreign keys
Foreign keys are defined in the ISO SQL Standard, through a FOREIGN KEY constraint. The syntax to add such a
constraint to an existing table is defined in SQL:2003 as shown below. Omitting the column list in the
REFERENCES clause implies that the foreign key shall reference the primary key of the referenced table.
ALTER TABLE <table identifier>
ADD [ CONSTRAINT <constraint identifier> ]
FOREIGN KEY ( <column expression> )
REFERENCES <table identifier> [ ( <column expression> {, <column expression>}... ) ]
Foreign key
2
[ ON UPDATE <referential action> ]
[ ON DELETE <referential action> ]
Likewise, foreign keys can be defined as part of the CREATE TABLE SQL statement.
CREATE TABLE table_name (
id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
col2 CHARACTER VARYING(20),
col3 INTEGER,
...
FOREIGN KEY(col3)
REFERENCES other_table(key_col) ON DELETE CASCADE,
... )
If the foreign key is a single column only, the column can be marked as such using the following syntax:
CREATE TABLE table_name (
id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
col2 CHARACTER VARYING(20),
col3 INTEGER REFERENCES other_table(column_name),
... )
Foreign keys can be defined with a stored procedure statement.Wikipedia:Please clarify
sp_foreignkey tabname, pktabname, col1 [, col2] ... [, col8]
tabname: the name of the table or view that contains the foreign key to be defined.
pktabname: the name of the table or view that has the primary key to which the foreign key applies. The primary
key must already be defined.
col1: the name of the first column that makes up the foreign key. The foreign key must have at least one column
and can have a maximum of eight columns.
Referential actions
Main article: Propagation constraint
Because the database management system enforces referential constraints, it must ensure data integrity if rows in a
referenced table are to be deleted (or updated). If dependent rows in referencing tables still exist, those references
have to be considered. SQL:2003 specifies 5 different referential actions that shall take place in such occurrences:
CASCADE
RESTRICT
NO ACTION
SET NULL
SET DEFAULT
Foreign key
3
CASCADE
Whenever rows in the master (referenced) table are deleted (or as the case may be, updated), the respective rows of
the child (referencing) table with a matching foreign key column will get deleted (or rather updated) as well. This is
called a cascade delete (or rather update).
RESTRICT
A value cannot be updated or deleted when a row exists in a referencing or child table that references the value in the
referenced table.
Similarly, a row cannot be deleted as long as there is a reference to it from a referencing or child table.
To understand RESTRICT (and CASCADE) better, it may be helpful to notice the following difference, which
might not be immediately clear. The referential action CASCADE modifies the "behavior" of the (child) table itself
where the word CASCADE is used. For example, ON DELETE CASCADE effectively says "When the referenced
row is deleted from the other table (master table), then delete also from me". However, the referential action
RESTRICT modifies the "behavior" of the master table, not the child table, although the word RESTRICT appears in
the child table and not in the master table! So, ON DELETE RESTRICT effectively says: "When someone tries to
delete the row from the other table (master table), prevent deletion from that other table (and of course, also don't
delete from me, but that's not the main point here)."
RESTRICT is not supported by Microsoft SQL 2012 and earlier.
NO ACTION
NO ACTION and RESTRICT are very much alike. The main difference between NO ACTION and RESTRICT is
that with NO ACTION the referential integrity check is done after trying to alter the table. RESTRICT does the
check before trying to execute the UPDATE or DELETE statement. Both referential actions act the same if the
referential integrity check fails: the UPDATE or DELETE statement will result in an error.
In other words, when an UPDATE or DELETE statement is executed on the referenced table using the referential
action NO ACTION, the DBMS verifies at the end of the statement execution that none of the referential
relationships are violated. This is different from RESTRICT, which assumes at the outset that the operation will
violate the constraint. Using NO ACTION, the triggers or the semantics of the statement itself may yield an end state
in which no foreign key relationships are violated by the time the constraint is finally checked, thus allowing the
statement to complete successfully.
SET DEFAULT , SET NULL
In general, the action taken by the DBMS for SET NULL or SET DEFAULT is the same for both ON DELETE or
ON UPDATE: The value of the affected referencing attributes is changed to NULL for SET NULL, and to the
specified default value for SET DEFAULT.
Triggers
Referential actions are generally implemented as implied triggers (i.e. triggers with system-generated names, often
hidden.) As such, they are subject to the same limitations as user-defined triggers, and their order of execution
relative to other triggers may need to be considered; in some cases it may become necessary to replace the referential
action with its equivalent user-defined trigger to ensure proper execution order, or to work around mutating-table
limitations.
Another important limitation appears with transaction isolation: your changes to a row may not be able to fully
cascade because the row is referenced by data your transaction cannot "see", and therefore cannot cascade onto. An
example: while your transaction is attempting to renumber a customer account, a simultaneous transaction is
Foreign key
4
attempting to create a new invoice for that same customer; while a CASCADE rule may fix all the invoice rows your
transaction can see to keep them consistent with the renumbered customer row, it won't reach into another
transaction to fix the data there; because the database cannot guarantee consistent data when the two transactions
commit, one of them will be forced to roll back (often on a first-come-first-served basis.)
Example
As a first example to illustrate foreign keys, suppose an accounts database has a table with invoices and each invoice
is associated with a particular supplier. Supplier details (such as name and address) are kept in a separate table; each
supplier is given a 'supplier number' to identify it. Each invoice record has an attribute containing the supplier
number for that invoice. Then, the 'supplier number' is the primary key in the Supplier table. The foreign key in the
Invoices table points to that primary key. The relational schema is the following. Primary keys are marked in bold,
and foreign keys are marked in italics.
Supplier ( SupplierNumber, Name, Address, Type )
Invoices ( InvoiceNumber, SupplierNumber, Text )
The corresponding Data Definition Language statement is as follows.
CREATE TABLE Supplier (
SupplierNumber INTEGER NOT NULL,
Name VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL,
Address VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL,
Type VARCHAR(10),
CONSTRAINT supplier_pk PRIMARY KEY(SupplierNumber),
CONSTRAINT number_value CHECK (SupplierNumber > 0) )
CREATE TABLE Invoices (
InvoiceNumber INTEGER NOT NULL,
SupplierNumber INTEGER NOT NULL,
Text VARCHAR(4096),
CONSTRAINT invoice_pk PRIMARY KEY(InvoiceNumber),
CONSTRAINT inumber_value CHECK (InvoiceNumber > 0),
CONSTRAINT supplier_fk FOREIGN KEY(SupplierNumber)
REFERENCES Supplier(SupplierNumber)
ON UPDATE CASCADE ON DELETE RESTRICT )
References
External links
SQL-99 Foreign Keys (https:/ / mariadb. com/ kb/ en/ constraint_type-foreign-key-constraint/ )
PostgreSQL Foreign Keys (http:/ / www. postgresql. org/ docs/ current/ static/ tutorial-fk. html)
MySQL Foreign Keys (http:/ / dev. mysql. com/ doc/ refman/ 5. 1/ en/ create-table-foreign-keys. html)
FirebirdSQL Foreign Keys (http:/ / www. firebirdsql. org/ manual/ nullguide-keys. html#nullguide-keys-fk)
SQLite support for Foreign Keys (http:/ / www. sqlite. org/ foreignkeys. html)
Microsoft SQL 2012 table_constraint (Transact-SQL) (http:/ / technet. microsoft. com/ en-us/ library/ ms188066.
aspx)
Article Sources and Contributors
5
Article Sources and Contributors
Foreign key Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=606506457 Contributors: 16@r, Abdull, Amix.pal, Anbu121, AndrewWarden, Arichnad, Arthur Schnabel, Arunsinghil,
Aurochs, AutumnSnow, Beesforan, Biochemza, Brick Thrower, Bullwinklle25, Can't sleep, clown will eat me, Cander0000, Causa sui, Clarificationgiven, Cory Donnelly, Cpiral, Cww, DHN,
Darth Panda, Derek Balsam, DireWolf, Dobi, Dougher, EWikist, Eldavan, Electricnet, Entropy, FatalError, Feder raz, Fluffernutter, Flyer22, Frap, Govorun, GregorB, Gsm1011, IanHarvey,
JHunterJ, Jadriman, Jesselong, Jim1138, Jk2q3jrklse, Jlenthe, Joebeone, John of Reading, KeyStroke, Kf4bdy, Kubntk, Larsinio, Marcusfriedman, Mark Renier, MexicanMan24, Mike Rosoft,
Mikeblas, MikeyTheK, Mindmatrix, Minimac, Mmtrebuchet, Mogism, Mormegil, MrOllie, Mrt3366, Natalie Erin, Ngriffeth, O.Koslowski, Obradovic Goran, PPOST, Pbwest, Peak, Polypus74,
RIL-sv, Reedy, Rjwilmsi, Rror, Rsrikanth05, SDS, Salvatore Ingala, Sboosali, Seanohagan, Selfworm, Semaperepelitsa, Semperf, Shreyasjoshis, Species8473, Staecker, Stolze, Svenmathijssen,
Tarquin, Tgeairn, The Thing That Should Not Be, TheExtruder, Threeacres, Timhowardriley, TobiasPersson, Troels Arvin, Unordained, Waskyo, WikHead, Zipz0p, , , 246
anonymous edits
License
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0
//creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/

You might also like