Hi there. If you are here and following me now because I said that I would fight whoever said that CSAT was a great metric at a public speaking event, I will not, in fact, fight anyone who believes that. I AM SORRY that it seems I have touched a nerve. Maybe I will become a CSAT apologist? Probably not. CSAT is great in an absolute vacuum—if you’ve got great responses, 100% adherence to sorting, lots of folks are responding and you are actually using the data, great. Most folks are not and that is why I say CSAT is dead. Continuing to use CSAT because it’s “the best we have” is like staying in a relationship that you know has been dead for years. You stagnate. You’re probably unhappy with it. You could be doing the same or better but are just kinda hanging out because it’s easier that way. Don’t do it! But also please be gentle when you come at me about a silly joke that I made at a conference because I’m a lil sensi gal and I will cry all over you.
I am prepared to bid for the Pay Per View rights to this fight. Less “the rumble in the jungle” more “the CSAT tit for tat”
But I really wanted to see a fight.
I'm just going to leave this little ode to CSAT right here... #TheBestWeHave #CSAT (hope ya didn't catch flack - sending good vibes, M) https://open.spotify.com/track/2IA1ctUxjk865QW3CpIuZk?si=395e9233149449da
I’m taking consulting jobs so if you need to outsource the fight my rates start at $240/hr
I do in fact only follow you for your CSAT antagonism FWIW
Enough of us here will support you on the mission to move away from CSAT as a major metric 🥰
If anyone said "oh yeah? You and what army?", it's us. Your followers. We will fight this on your behalf, sarge.
I 100% agree with you. Maybe this is more controversial, but I'd say NPS is even worse.
⭐ Award Winner | "CX Dictionary" Author | CX Myth-buster | Practice Leader ⭐
1moMercer Smith I don't see why you'd need to apologise anyway for a number of reasons, not least of which is that LI is a public forum designed to enable opinion-sharing, which is all you probably did. But - and more importantly - you were right in the first place. C-Sat is horse crap. It flatlines at 70-80% everywhere, in all industries, has done for years upon years and means nothing. It is a measure of ordinariness. "I'm satisfied" is a proxy for saying "You met my expectation". And you expect as a brand to differentiate on that? 🤣 Ditch it (as I have written many times over for many years) and I can quote companies that have followed my advice and adopted alternative metrics which are far more provocative and galvanising in terms of what the results actually stimulate. Which is exactly what you want in market research - outcomes that trigger reaction, not apathy.