Mercer Smith’s Post

View profile for Mercer Smith, graphic

VP, Community + Education at PartnerHero, Author of CXOXO | Talking about creating your customer experience from scratch. I build and scale customer-facing teams that care and can help you do the same.

Hi there. If you are here and following me now because I said that I would fight whoever said that CSAT was a great metric at a public speaking event, I will not, in fact, fight anyone who believes that. I AM SORRY that it seems I have touched a nerve. Maybe I will become a CSAT apologist? Probably not. CSAT is great in an absolute vacuum—if you’ve got great responses, 100% adherence to sorting, lots of folks are responding and you are actually using the data, great. Most folks are not and that is why I say CSAT is dead. Continuing to use CSAT because it’s “the best we have” is like staying in a relationship that you know has been dead for years. You stagnate. You’re probably unhappy with it. You could be doing the same or better but are just kinda hanging out because it’s easier that way. Don’t do it! But also please be gentle when you come at me about a silly joke that I made at a conference because I’m a lil sensi gal and I will cry all over you.

Ben Phillips

⭐ Award Winner | "CX Dictionary" Author | CX Myth-buster | Practice Leader ⭐

1mo

Mercer Smith I don't see why you'd need to apologise anyway for a number of reasons, not least of which is that LI is a public forum designed to enable opinion-sharing, which is all you probably did. But - and more importantly - you were right in the first place. C-Sat is horse crap. It flatlines at 70-80% everywhere, in all industries, has done for years upon years and means nothing. It is a measure of ordinariness. "I'm satisfied" is a proxy for saying "You met my expectation". And you expect as a brand to differentiate on that? 🤣 Ditch it (as I have written many times over for many years) and I can quote companies that have followed my advice and adopted alternative metrics which are far more provocative and galvanising in terms of what the results actually stimulate. Which is exactly what you want in market research - outcomes that trigger reaction, not apathy.

Mathew Patterson

Customer Service Content Lead at Help Scout

1mo

I am prepared to bid for the Pay Per View rights to this fight. Less “the rumble in the jungle” more “the CSAT tit for tat”

Tristan Hagen

Senior Support Analyst @ Stensul

1mo

But I really wanted to see a fight.

Like
Reply
John Dieter

I hype joy. #CX #Product

1mo

I'm just going to leave this little ode to CSAT right here... #TheBestWeHave #CSAT (hope ya didn't catch flack - sending good vibes, M) https://open.spotify.com/track/2IA1ctUxjk865QW3CpIuZk?si=395e9233149449da

Like
Reply

I’m taking consulting jobs so if you need to outsource the fight my rates start at $240/hr

Jack Moberger

Customs Innovation | Global Trade

1mo

I do in fact only follow you for your CSAT antagonism FWIW

Nivedha Venkatesh

Building Pageloop, x-Postman+Zapier

1mo

Enough of us here will support you on the mission to move away from CSAT as a major metric 🥰

Like
Reply
Alison Gootee

Compliance and Deliverability Enablement Principal at Braze

1mo

If anyone said "oh yeah? You and what army?", it's us. Your followers. We will fight this on your behalf, sarge.

I 100% agree with you. Maybe this is more controversial, but I'd say NPS is even worse.

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics