Nathaniel Horadam’s Post

View profile for Nathaniel Horadam, graphic

Financing the American manufacturing renaissance at DOE Loan Programs Office

Today we can announce that LPO has closed a $9.63 billion loan with Blue Oval SK, the joint venture of Ford Motor Company and SK Innovation, to build three #battery #gigafactories in Tennessee and Kentucky. This loan represents the largest investment DOE has ever made under our Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing (ATVM) program. When all three facilities reach full operations, they will support 7500 jobs and 120 GWh of battery cell production. More importantly, they will mark another huge step forward for America's #EV transition, supporting Ford's next generation of more affordable vehicles. With technology and consumer preferences rapidly changing, Western automakers facing a juggernaut of Chinese state-supported production and global sales, and policy uncertainty in the US, Europe, and other key markets...these low-cost loans allow legacy #automakers to commit to the long-term investments they will need to remain competitive into the next decade. And simply put, America cannot build globally competitive battery #supplychains without rapidly growing EV demand to draw in capital from the private sector. Our blog post here: https://lnkd.in/ecq4vKek #automotive #manufacturing #mobility #transportation #economicdevelopment #criticalminerals https://lnkd.in/eudAa8WY

US finalizes $9.63 billion loan for Ford, SK On joint battery venture

US finalizes $9.63 billion loan for Ford, SK On joint battery venture

courier-journal.com

Brendan Andrews

Vice President, Energy & Infrastructure at Bureau Veritas

5d

Nathaniel Horadam your final statement is most important. While it is true that we cannot build a globally competitive battery supply chain without mass adoption of EVs, we cannot grow the demand of EVs rapidly without expanding the charging infrastructure. Now the biggest issue becomes the existing power grid infrastructure which will require massive investment to upgrade,

Chad Arndt

Special Inspector, CWI/CWE ACI lvl 2, Supplier Quality Specialist and Author

5d

Abandon electric vehicles. It's a science project that is rooted in lessons learned already and makes guinea pigs of American tax payers.

Meredith Alexander

Principal at Gridwell Consulting

3d

Why aren’t we funding gigafactories in states that actually support EV adoption? Why are red states with low EV uptake getting all the jobs? (The exceptions being NC and IL)

Great. Huge taxpayer risks to fund cars people don't want. Even if batteries were somehow made significantly cheaper, that won't change their performance or limitations.

Brendan Jephcott

Battery Minerals Research

5d

Are these going to be NCM batteries traditionally produced from SK or LFP?

Michael Taylor

National Recruiter at Executive Viewpoint Recruitment

5d

Nathaniel, I have an honest question. Do staff in the LPO get paid commissions for loans like these?

Like
Reply
Rick Jones

Cloud Engineer at NextGen Healthcare

5d

Oh look, yet another contribution to yet another fiscal hemorrhage of tax payer dollars, that yet again, will lead to nothing fortuitous... We're at what, like $20 billion this month devoted to economic disaster projects that we, the people, all hope gets axed? I love the theory that we intend to compete in a market that even the consumers want no part of... #Sustainability is just Sustenance on our tax dollars. #DepartmentOfEmbarrassment

Steve Boussom

CPA Firm Owner at Steven R. Boussom, CPA

5d

The facts about EV batteries draining quickly and charging slowly in cold weather must be another inconvenient truth. Carbon dioxide is good for the environment.

Bayo A.

📈 Data Engineering Virtuoso 🚀 optimizing data flows in pipelines with SQL databases, Python machine learning, and ETL data integrations 💼 for business, developers and data scientists.

5d

Another multibillion-dollar taxpayer-funded life support system for the auto industry's flatlining innovation. Ten billion dollars to help Ford Motor Company play catch-up in the EV battery game, because what's a few decades of foot-dragging on electrification when you've got a blank check from Uncle Sam? Meanwhile, Detroit's implosion becomes a spectacular, slow-motion train wreck, with Ford's EV offerings being the latest shiny objects to distract from their overall lack of vision. Because what's more 'forward-thinking' than bankrolling a corporate dinosaur like Ford as they desperately cling to relevance, while Chinese manufacturers like BYD and NIO feast on their carcasses and actually deliver innovative EVs to market? And hey, who needs actual vision or strategy when you've got a bottomless checkbook and a prayer that capitalism's fairy godmother will magically fix everything? Brilliant. Can't wait for the next episode of 'Throwing Good Money After Bad' – or as I like to call it, 'Business as Usual'.

The U.S. government's decision to finalize a nearly $10 billion loan to the joint venture between Ford and South Korea's SK On represents a significant investment in the future of the American auto industry, particularly in the realm of electric vehicles (EVs) and battery technology. This funding will facilitate the establishment of three new battery plants in Tennessee and Kentucky, which is expected to bolster domestic production capabilities and reduce reliance on foreign battery suppliers. The timing of this investment is crucial, as it comes amid notable challenges facing major U.S. automakers. The recent departure of Stellantis's CEO and General Motors' decision to shut down its robotaxi unit highlight the industry's struggles with costly technological transitions and increased competition. The shift towards electric and autonomous vehicles requires substantial investment in research, development, and infrastructure, which can strain resources and lead to strategic reevaluations. Additionally, the rising threat from Chinese firms, which have made significant advancements in EV technology and production, adds pressure on U.S. automakers to innovate and remain competitive.

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics