Research shows that working from home decreases the motherhood penalty - as businesses allow more of their employees to work remotely, the employment gap between women with children and those without narrows. Meanwhile, the backlash against remote working, mostly by wealthy white men, continues to rage on. I get that there are challenges with remote working - PTS is entirely remote - but the benefits massively outweigh the cons. If you want a company culture that works for all employees then stop demanding people get back to the office.
Many leaders pushing for a return to the office are driven by personal preference rather than business need. It often stems from a desire for control, ego, or simply being stuck in outdated management models. Forcing employees back when remote work is proven effective isn’t just a waste of time—it’s short-sighted and risks talent retention. Leaders need to adapt to what works best for their people, not just what feels comfortable for them. Flexibility and trust are the new markers of successful leadership.
It’s insane to me that some media outlets still paint working from home as lazy, unproductive, or just an excuse to watch TV all day. The reality? For many of us, especially working parents, WFH means we're more productive, more focused, and more present for our families. I can speak from experience: the volume and quality of work I achieve at home is far higher than when I’m in the office. I may occasionally throw on a quick loads of washing, or get my shopping delivered over a lunchbreak, but I’m working harder than ever, often without taking proper breaks. WFH allows me to be present for my daughter while balancing a career, which is something that wasn’t always possible for previous generations. Many of those who argue against remote work come from households where their mums/wives were stay-at-home mums—nothing wrong with that!—but this generation of working parents are now millennials where both parents usually need to work and are juggling both worlds, showing our kids how to work hard, balance responsibilities, and still achieve success. It’s time to move beyond these outdated views of remote work
The only reason these men (I don’t see any women quoted in this piece, shocker) have been able to work exclusively in an office is because there has been a woman (or series of women) holding the fort down at home. Flexible work is here to stay. Employers will want to attract the top talent who will demand it. These articles are evidence of an extinction burst of an antiquated concept that is quickly dying out. Some industries will require in person roles for the forseeable, but for the vast majority of office workers this is simple not the case. And don’t forget! You’re not married to your employer. Skill up in technical certifications, customer success, operations or sales and the world becomes your oyster.
<shaking my head> at these headlines. Keep your heads up ladies. We work as grown ups and we don't need to be in someone elses office to deliver brilliant work. We are trusted. We are focussed. We are smashing it. And guess where from?? Wherever on mother earth we feel like it. Oooh and what's the employee satisfaction rate for a business* like that? Yep, you got it, 100%. I'm sure our kids would give us a 100% satisfaction rate too, because their parents can be there for them when they need us most. * service based business with clients nationally and globally.
I couldn't agree more and it's funny how we never talk about the millions of people who are self employed who work remotely and it works just fine. I really don't get the obsession with some businesses to push the office as the place to be - that idea died once we all had to work remotely in the pandemic and it worked. I am not anti face to face and I think there's value when there's a purpose but not just because some dinosaur 🦖 at the top of the tree wants to keep an eye 👀 on his people and justify the excruciating rent they pay on offices. Tell me I'm wrong? 🤭
The short sightedness confuses me. Pushing parents - mostly mums- out of the workforce is an expensive loss of talent that has been nurtured and should be valued. But it won't stop there. House prices and rent continue to rise faster than wages, and commuting costs in many places where companies have HQs are already eye watering. The mostly mums are Canaries in a coal mine here. There is only so long professionals with stressful roles will put up with spending three hours a day commuting or living in a cramped house share with a bad landlord before they take the "less prestigious" job that supports an actual life - whether that's because they met the partner of their dreams or because they want more time for watching horror films. People with disabilities will not necessarily be able to tolerate ever mounting commuting times. Professionals at their absolute peak are burning out already. Short of a major, structural change in housing and transport economic force majeure looks like making 5 day commutes prohibitive for vast numbers of workers fairly soon. But all the CEOs seem to look at is next quarter's profits, a pension plan in commercial property or some petty power plays.
I literally wouldn't be able to work if it was full time and office based. Well, I could but it would mean my 18 month old baby and 4 year old child would be in childcare for 11hrs of their 12 waking hours a day. And, that is not okay for me. I'm sure I'm not the only one! Since the majority of families need two working parents now to survive, we just don't have the luxury of being both a full time parent and full time working team. So we need flexibility. It's not a want. It's a need. Our children need us. The economy needs us to have children. More flexibility is needed. Not less.
Lets not forget that remote work actually makes work accessible for people that are unable to commute or be in an office. The people that many, including the government, are quick to call lazy because they physically can not access work, but many want nothing more. Remote working is nothing new, it didn't start with the pandemic, some have been fighting for it to enable them to access work. The number of remote and even hybrid roles are reducing because of poorly executed (paid for) research. There will always be examples of poor performance, manage that! Wfh is most certainly not lazy, normally I get more done and work longer hours than when in the office. Adapting to create a culture where your employees want to work well in any environment rather than be concerned about exactly where employees sit is paramount.
You lost me at 'wealthy white men'. What has race got to do with this debate. Distilling the discussion about working from home being either good or bad is to over simplify something we don't yet understand fully mostly because very little research has been done in this field..because of this, forthright claims on either side of the debate are both disingenuous and unhelpful. Lockdown in 2020 introduced normalization of working from home..this resulted in increased productivity in some scenarios but lower productivity in others. The organisation I worked for at the time notices the following unintended consequences: - increase in work related stress caused by 1- the intrusion of work into the domestic space 2- the inability of some to switch off 3 - the lack of suitable working environment at home this was especially the case for young people 4- lack of human contact and isolation 5- frequent cases of workplace conflict caused by miscommunication and misinterpretation Calls to our mental health providers specifically about workplace relationships increased. We do not yet understand the impact removing the 'soft' interactions at work has on a workplace society. Remote working tends to distill working relationships
Your personalised antidote to modern-day stress | Ex-British Intelligence | Ex-Reebok/adidas | Gym founder | Working with your body’s natural intelligence
2moI couldn’t agree more. Even those companies who claim to offer flexible working still have little understanding, it seems, of two key issues: 1) that ‘flexible working’ means more than offering one day a week from home or slightly compressed hours (*rolls eyes*) and 2) just HOW PRODUCTIVE WORKING MOTHERS REALLY ARE. what do we learn while we’re on maternity leave? How to switch between multiple roles and demands in seconds; how to become incredibly efficient (there is research backing this up, ref. McKinsey & Co); how to prioritise; what tasks will actually make a positive difference to a business/family (delete as appropriate). The lack of more senior roles for women who are incredibly experienced and valuable, and have simply fallen foul of the motherhood penalty, is shocking, as is the unwillingness to embrace women for what we can offer. Most leadership teams still sadly expect us to be a facsimile of a stereotypical man. SO much change is needed.