Stricter rules for SkillsFuture training providers: progress or peril? Singapore’s SkillsFuture SG is tightening its grip on its Registered Training Providers (RTP), aiming to raise quality standards. But is this a game-changer or a double-edged sword? Sure, weeding out subpar courses is great. But here’s the catch: - *Subjective Feedback Metrics*: How fair is it to judge quality solely on learner surveys? What happens when poor ratings stem from unrealistic expectations rather than actual deficiencies? Conversely, what happens when good ratings are the result of "sweeteners" given to learners? - *Impact on Small Providers*: Stricter rules disproportionately hurt small businesses. Can we afford to lose the diversity and unique offerings they bring to the table? - *Stifling Innovation*: Will rigid compliance kill creativity, turning courses into checkbox exercises instead of transformative learning experiences? - *Unrealistic Timelines*: Three months to revamp a program? Change takes time. Flexibility could foster genuine improvement over quick fixes. These measures aim high, but are we creating an ecosystem where only the biggest and blandest survive? If you’re a provider, learner, or policymaker, let’s talk. How can we balance quality with inclusivity and innovation? Share your thoughts. #SkillsFuture #LifelongLearning #EducationPolicy #TrainingInnovation
With harsher rules and regulations only make things worse for smaller ATOs as they may not have the manpower to acertain the standards. What is not fair is that by justifying and judging with the learners survey, larger ATOs can give vouchers or rewards to encourage high level of complements but did not answer to “Is this a quality course done by quality and qualified professionals?” I think that is more important.. anyway whatever the public comments maybe i do not think skills future going to change any ruling .. they just wish to be accountable as they are utilising fundings from govt
Sometimes, it not about getting the roles. It's about interest. If u are interested in fragrance making, u can get a course on fragrance making at subsided rate. From there u can be a self starter home based business owner etc. Same with culinary classes and baking classes. I not sure largely subjective esp the human perspective.
Until some KPI is attached with a course, i.e how many of participants got some role after attending traing, these courses have no meaning. Many of them are just mere certs and nothing practical.
International student recruitment |Strategic planning |Adviser |Creative |Negotiator |Management |NBD
3wLook at the material provided for the learners. It’s already failing the learners. How many learners will be able to remember that’s all taught if the materials is just brief photocopy bundle to give to learners. It’s much worse than compare to those during IT Power courses. I am not referring to all RTP, but a small minority who manage to get pass through the course materials approval. I am not a Professor in education pedagogy but having been a IT Power instructor, ACTA and DACE developer, I can tell the difference between a worthy materials and a “rush job” materials just to get the numbers in.