Charles River Associates’ Post

The EEOC released 2017-2018 summary pay data from EEO-1 Component 2 submissions to allow companies to compare their compensation with industry and geographic benchmarks. This data collection was controversial due to the burden imposed on firms and unclear benefits. Valentin Estevez and Doug Owens used the EEOC's methodology to create similar pay data summaries using the American Community Survey (ACS), a well-known and publicly available representative survey of the US population. Notably, they found that the gender pay distributions from both sources are strikingly similar, casting doubt on the usefulness of collecting Component 2 data given the burden it imposes on companies. Pay equity is a complex and detail-intensive issue, and high-level pay gap calculations, such as those constructed from Component 2 data or the ACS survey, can yield misleading findings. #CRALaborEmployment economists have conducted thousands of proactive pay equity and employment practices audits to ensure compliance with the universe of ever-changing employment regulations and mitigate litigation and reputational risks effectively. Click here to download the infographic: https://crai.news/b72

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics