More and more HR leaders - and even finance, marketing, ops, legal, sales, etc - are going fractional. What does that mean for the company/business side? It means that you get access to help for your org with amazing expertise at a fraction of the time and cost AND without taking months and months to find a new executive. Which means you can keep things moving, not stall projects, and not extending revenue gaps. But I’m seeing a lot of companies do this wrong when it comes to talking to fractional execs. It is not an interview process, there is no resume, there is no RFP. The magic lies within your network. Ask your network for who is fractional, and understand what their strengths are and what they want to work on so that you understand who to pull in (or refer) for certain times in your business. With fractional, you HAVE to have trust from the outset of the relationship, either through knowing the person ahead of time or previously or through transient trust from the person referring you in. Without it, the fractional relationship will not work - because we have a short (1-2 week) listening tour and then start to make impact. That can’t happen without trust. Think of it this way, a full-time leader takes 3-12 months to find, then they take 3-6 months on a listening tour, and then they dive in to make changes and make impact. A Fractional leader starts with trust (transient or otherwise), have a listening tour of 1-2 weeks and then start to make impact at week 2 or 3. Just that one example showcases that a fractional leader takes 6-18 months less time trying to figure out your org and more time doing the work in the org and strategically setting you up for success and the future. Another way to think about this is that hiring a FT leader sets you back 6-18 months. And I’m not sure how many businesses actually want that. Oh and by the way, the FT leader costs more. So on one hand, you have a fractional leader that has been there, knows and recognizes more trends because they’ve worked across more orgs, can come in and establish things quickly to make an impact AND costs less……compared to a FT leader that may have worked at 1 to a few places previously, takes 3-6 months listening tour, AND costs more (for overhead like benefits, taxes, etc). What would you decide on as a business leader? #fractional #fractionalexec #fractionalhr
While I get the sentiment regarding trust and the like, this unfortunately perpetuates bias and inequity. When the majority of folks in positions of hiring power are white (and often white males), the people in their network will likely look like them and this leaves out historically oppressed demographics. This is precisely why I founded thebsuite.co. Tapping a friend of a friend for a gig can’t be a substitute for process or vetting. Well, at least not if you want to be equitable.
What is the average duration of the fractional gigs y’all take on?
Could not agree more. Why NOT hire someone who can make 10x impact in 10x less time, and for half the cost of a full-time hire? For anyone worried about the "jumpiness" of a consultant, consider this: fractional leaders execute across various industries as opposed to one or two. We have seen what works and what doesn't and can help you apply these learnings - and often bring new perspectives to an otherwise homogenous table.
I’m searching for a fractional National Sales Director with natural CPG exp in Canada for my client. If you or anyone you know, have suitable candidates let me know
Commenting for better reach 🤗
Yes! As a fractional CFO, I love being able to help companies that normally could not hire a dedicated CFO!
Great analogy. Come in, assess and diagnose, design, analyze and implement the solutions needed.
Fractional CHRO | Elevating organizations with strategic HR solutions | Change & Transformation Expert | Board Member | Volunteer
4moI’m a huge fan of the fractional model, but I don’t think it’s for everyone. I actually think the comparison between hiring a FT vs fractional leader is a tough comparison, because at a certain size, I do feel organizations benefit from having a dedicated, full-time leader. I think the sweet spot for fractional leadership is really the companies that simply can’t afford (and don’t need) full time support, in which case you’re almost selling them on the benefits of having a fractional leader vs having the CEO wearing the HR hat ;) I also think we have to be cautious on promoting the cost savings too much or we risk devalueing ourselves. My hourly rate is much higher as a fractional leader because of the lack of stability, benefits, etc. For small companies that genuinely only need a small amount of support, absolutely it’s a cost-savings. But I’m seeing an increase in mid-sized companies wanting to save money, but expecting a fractional leader to drive initiatives, growth and change at a pace that requires a full-time dedicated leader. Just some of the things I’ve been seeing, but that’s not indicative of the entire market either!