Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't ICE when encountering bound regions in generator interior type #122358

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 21, 2024

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

I'm pretty sure this meant to say "has_free_regions", probably just a typo in 4a4fc3b. We can have bound regions (because we only convert non-bound regions into existential regions in generator interiors), but we can't have (non-ReErased) free regions.

r? lcnr

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver) labels Mar 12, 2024
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 12, 2024

Some changes occurred to the core trait solver

cc @rust-lang/initiative-trait-system-refactor

@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

lcnr commented Mar 12, 2024

maybe change it to !ty.has_free_regions() && !ty.has_escaping_bound_vars()

We can have bound regions (because we only convert non-bound regions into existential regions in generator interiors), but we can't have (non-ReErased) free regions.

given the fact that nested bound regions clearly must exist, it did take me a few minutes to actually understand what this meant here. Though, given that we ICE when tcx.fold_regions encounters a non-erased region, do we even need the debug_assert in the first place?

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

Yeah that debug assertion does nothing then.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 14, 2024

Some changes occurred in src/tools/cargo

cc @ehuss

@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

lcnr commented Mar 14, 2024

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 14, 2024

📌 Commit a85dbfb has been approved by lcnr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 14, 2024
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

lol I pushed at the same time as the r+

@bors -

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r-

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Mar 14, 2024
@compiler-errors compiler-errors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Mar 14, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@lcnr lcnr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please add a "FIXME: use bound_coroutine_hidden_types instead and work towards removing this to coroutine_hidden_types". r=me after

I refuse to fix this in the old solver; its lazy instantiation of
binders will be the end of me.
@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

lcnr commented Mar 21, 2024

❤️

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 21, 2024

📌 Commit bca708b has been approved by lcnr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 21, 2024
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2024
…enerator, r=lcnr

Don't ICE when encountering bound regions in generator interior type

I'm pretty sure this meant to say "`has_free_regions`", probably just a typo in 4a4fc3b. We can have bound regions (because we only convert non-bound regions into existential regions in generator interiors), but we can't have (non-ReErased) free regions.

r? lcnr
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#122222 (deref patterns: bare-bones feature gate and typechecking)
 - rust-lang#122358 (Don't ICE when encountering bound regions in generator interior type)
 - rust-lang#122696 (Add bare metal riscv32 target.)
 - rust-lang#122773 (make "expected paren or brace" error translatable)
 - rust-lang#122795 (Inherit `RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP` when testing wasm)
 - rust-lang#122799 (Replace closures with `_` when suggesting fully qualified path for method call)
 - rust-lang#122801 (Fix misc printing issues in emit=stable_mir)
 - rust-lang#122806 (Make `type_ascribe!` not a built-in)

Failed merges:

 - rust-lang#122771 (add some comments to hir::ModuleItems)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit e78522f into rust-lang:master Mar 21, 2024
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.79.0 milestone Mar 21, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#122358 - compiler-errors:bound-regions-in-generator, r=lcnr

Don't ICE when encountering bound regions in generator interior type

I'm pretty sure this meant to say "`has_free_regions`", probably just a typo in 4a4fc3b. We can have bound regions (because we only convert non-bound regions into existential regions in generator interiors), but we can't have (non-ReErased) free regions.

r? lcnr
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants