Ahmed Shafik Attia

Understanding Safety Integrity Levels (SIL) & Layers of Protection Analysis (LOPA) If you're looking to deepen your understanding of essential process safety concepts, this article is a must-read. It provides concise overview of key terms like Safety Integrity Levels (SIL), Layers of Protection Analysis (LOPA) Don't miss out on this opportunity to enhance your knowledge and improve safety in your operations! #SIL #LOPA #SIS, #SIF, #PFD #SFF #processsafety 1-PHA (Process Hazards Analysis): This is the starting point in identifying potential hazards in a process, ranging from a basic screening to a comprehensive Hazard and Operability (HAZOP) study. PHA is essential in determining whether a Safety Instrumented System (SIS) is needed. 2-SIS (Safety Instrumented System): A system designed to bring the process to a "safe state" when predefined conditions are breached. It does this through Safety Instrumented Functions (SIFs). 3-SIF (Safety Instrumented Function): A specific function within the SIS that ensures the process is maintained in or brought to a safe state. It includes sensors, logic solvers, and final control elements, all of which must work together to detect and mitigate hazards. The devices used in a SIF are selected based on their required Safety Integrity Level (SIL). 4-SIL (Safety Integrity Level): This indicates the acceptable failure rate of a safety function, with levels ranging from 1 to 4. Higher SIL levels correspond to higher risk reduction requirements and lower acceptable failure rates. SIL is closely related to the Probability of Failure on Demand (PFD) and the Safe Failure Fraction (SFF). 5-PFD (Probability of Failure on Demand): This is the likelihood that a safety device will fail to perform its required function when needed. The average PFD (PFDavg) for all elements within a SIF is used to evaluate the SIL. 6-SFF (Safe Failure Fraction): This represents the percentage of failures that are either safe (having no negative impact) or that are detected by the device itself. The focus is particularly on Dangerous Undetected failures, which are those that are not identified and could lead to hazardous situations.

42

1 Comment

5.4 Review and Approval 1. The Review Team evaluates the proposed change and associated risk assessment. 2. If additional information or modifications are needed, return the request to the Initiator for revision. 3. If the change is acceptable, approve the MOC request. 4. Document the approval and obtain necessary signatures from the Review Team and Operations Manager. 5.5 Implementation 1. Develop an implementation plan, including a timeline and responsible personnel. 2. Communicate the approved change and implementation plan to all affected parties. 3. Implement the change according to the plan. 4. Monitor the implementation to ensure compliance with the plan and mitigation measures. 5.6 Post-Implementation Review 1. Conduct a post-implementation review to verify that the change has been implemented successfully and is functioning as intended. 2. Document the results of the review and any lessons learned. 3. Update relevant documentation, including procedures, training materials, and process safety information. 5.7 Close-Out 1. The MOC Coordinator ensures all documentation is complete and files the records. 2. Close the MOC in the tracking system. 6. Documentation • MOC Request Form (Appendix A) • Risk Assessment Checklist (Appendix B) • Implementation Plan • Post-Implementation Review Report 7. Appendices Appendix A: MOC Request Form • Request Number: • Date: • Initiator: • Description of Change: • Reason for Change: • Impact Assessment: • Proposed Implementation Date: • Signatures: Appendix B: Risk Assessment Checklist 1. Hazard Identification: • Are there new hazards introduced by the change? • Does the change affect existing controls? 2. Safety Impact: • Will the change affect personnel safety? • Are new safety measures required? 3. Health Impact: • Could the change impact occupational health? • Are additional health assessments needed? 4. Environmental Impact: • Will the change affect environmental compliance? • Are there new environmental controls needed? 5. Operational Impact: • Does the change affect process operations or efficiency? • Are additional training or operational procedures needed? 8. Checklist MOC Checklist • MOC Request Form completed and submitted. • Initial review conducted by MOC Coordinator. • Review Team assembled. • Risk Assessment Checklist completed. • Review Team approval obtained. • Implementation plan developed. • Communication plan executed. • Change implemented. • Post-implementation review conducted. • Documentation updated. • MOC closed in the tracking system. This MOC procedure aims to ensure that changes are managed systematically, risks are identified and mitigated, and operations remain safe and efficient.

3

Why is ISO 14040 Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Crucial? This course provides participants with the essential skills to perform thorough Life Cycle Assessments according to ISO 14040 standards. Key topics include: - Defining LCA Goals and Scope: Learn how to effectively set objectives and outline the scope. - Life Cycle Inventory (LCI): Explore the tools and techniques for accurate data collection and validation. - Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA): Discover methods for assessing the environmental impacts of your product system. - Life Cycle Interpretation: Develop the ability to analyze results, draw meaningful conclusions, and make informed recommendations. We are excited to announce the successful completion of the Accredited #ISO #14010 #Life_Cycle_Assessments for aramco Senior Environment Team, delivered by NExT SLB. Join us to deepen your understanding of the ISO 14010 LCA framework and learn how to leverage it to enhance the environmental performance of products. #Sustainability #EnvironmentalImpact #LCA #ISOStandards #HSE

14

Date: 06, September Safety Talk of the day: - 4. Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) PHA is used to identify evaluate & Control hazards associated with hazardous process & facilities in a way that the Hazards are addressed proactively and all Process related incidents are prevented  Utilizes an Organized, Methodical Approach.  Seeks and achieves multi-disciplined consensus.  Documents results for future use in follow-up and training of personnel so that injuries and process related incidents are prevented. Consist of 2 parts:  Consequence analysis (CA).  Process hazards review (PHR). Consequence Analysis (CA)  An estimate of a range of potential release quantities usually expressed as release rates that might occur as a result of failure of Engineering or Administrative control.  An Estimate of the downwind effects (concentration vs. distance) for Toxic & Flammables, Heat effects for ignition of flammable clouds & over pressure grids for explosive substances.  An estimate of the impact of surrounding population & the Environment (On site & Off site) Process Hazard Review  STAGE-1: Process Hazard review at Basic Engg Stage (Conceptual Safety)  STAGE-2: Process Hazard review before the CAPEX approval  STAGE-3: Detailed Process Hazard Review after CAPEX approval on the detailed design.  Pre-Start-up Safety Review-Related process Safety Management to ensure final check on all PHR recommendations.

15

Hazard Identification #HAZID Study guideline is promoted by IEC 17776 which evaluates Major Accident Hazards #MAH in the design, construction, and operation of offshore installations, focusing on both preventive and mitigative measures.

23

Notes: • Identify Change: This step involves recognizing the need for a change. • Complete MOC Request Form: The initiator completes the form detailing the change. • Submit Form to MOC Coordinator: The completed form is submitted to the MOC Coordinator. • Initial Review by MOC Coordinator: The Coordinator reviews the form to determine if the change is significant. • Assemble Review Team: If the change is significant, a review team is assembled. • Conduct Risk Assessment: The review team assesses the risks associated with the change. • Develop Mitigation Measures: Mitigation measures are developed based on the risk assessment. • Review and Approval by Review Team: The review team evaluates and approves or rejects the change. • Additional Information Needed?: If additional information is needed, the request is returned for revision. • Approve MOC Request: Once approved, proceed to implementation. • Permanent or Temporary Change?: Determine if the change is permanent or temporary. • Develop Implementation Plan: An implementation plan is developed. • Communicate Change and Implementation Plan: The plan is communicated to all affected parties. • Implement Change: The change is implemented according to the plan. • Monitor Implementation and Compliance: Ensure compliance with the plan and mitigation measures. • Post-Implementation Review: Conduct a review to ensure the change is functioning as intended. • Temporary Change Revert or Extend if Needed: For temporary changes, revert to the original state or extend if necessary. • Update Documentation: Update all relevant documentation. • Close Out MOC: Close the MOC process and file all records. This flow chart provides a clear visual representation of the MOC process, including key steps and decision points.

1

🌟 Integrated Management System (IMS) 🌟 1️⃣ What is an IMS? An Integrated Management System (IMS) is a comprehensive approach that combines multiple management systems into one cohesive framework. This integration helps organizations streamline their processes, improve efficiency, and enhance overall performance. 2️⃣ ISO 9001: Quality Management System ISO 9001 is an international standard that sets out the criteria for a quality management system. By implementing ISO 9001, organizations can ensure consistent quality in their products and services, enhance customer satisfaction, and drive continuous improvement. 3️⃣ ISO 45001: Occupational Health and Safety Management System ISO 45001 is the international standard for occupational health and safety management systems. It provides a framework for organizations to identify and manage occupational health and safety risks, promote a safe working environment, and comply with legal requirements. 4️⃣ ISO 14001: Environmental Management System ISO 14001 is a globally recognized standard for environmental management systems. By implementing ISO 14001, organizations can minimize their environmental impact, improve resource efficiency, and demonstrate their commitment to sustainability. Incorporating ISO 9001, ISO 45001, and ISO 14001 into an IMS can help organizations achieve greater synergy, reduce duplication of efforts, and drive continuous improvement across all areas of their operations. If you're looking to enhance your organization's performance and demonstrate your commitment to quality, safety, and environmental responsibility, consider implementing an IMS today! 🌍🏆 #IMS #ISO9001 #ISO45001 #ISO14001 #Quality #Safety #Environment #ManagementSystem

6

BUILDING AN ORGANIZATIONAL SAFETY CULTURE! Learn how you can start, implement, and sustain an engaging safety culture and have a greater impact in your organization. BCSP MISSION We inspire and develop leaders in safety, health, and environmental practice through globally accredited certification; enhancing careers, advancing the profession, protecting people. @BCSP

3

How do we know if a process plant or operation is #safe? We may look at our historical records of plant/operation incidents and near misses, or history of incidents of similar plants/operations, etc. and say, "yeah well, history tells we're perfectly safe 'cause there hasn't been any incident in the past" But, we need to ask again... What #guarantee do we have that there isn't a serious incident about to happen? If there's #NO guarantee, what can we #do about it???? There's an old saying... "There're always news about safety, and some of those news will be bad" #processsafety #reliability #risk #miningindustry #oilandgasindustry

11

4 Comments

Hazard Review Checklist for Permanent vs. Temporary Changes General Information • MOC Request Number: • Date: • Initiator: • Description of Change: • Type of Change: Permanent / Temporary (specify duration if temporary) 1. Hazard Identification • Have all potential new hazards introduced by the change been identified? • Have existing hazards that could be affected by the change been reviewed? 2. Safety Impact • Will the change affect personnel safety? • Are there any new risks of injury or accidents due to the change? • Are existing safety controls sufficient to manage the new hazards? • Is additional personal protective equipment (PPE) required? 3. Health Impact • Could the change impact occupational health? • Are there any new exposure risks (chemical, biological, physical)? • Are additional health assessments or monitoring required? • Is there a need for new or updated health and safety training for employees? 4. Environmental Impact • Will the change affect environmental compliance? • Are there any new emissions or waste streams created by the change? • Are there new risks of spills or releases to the environment? • Are current environmental controls adequate to manage new risks? 5. Operational Impact • Does the change affect process operations or efficiency? • Will the change alter operational procedures? • Are there new operational risks or failure modes introduced? • Are existing operational controls sufficient to manage new risks? • Is additional training required for operators?

2

OSHA HazCom standard Hazard communication - the OSHA way 16 must point to mention by manufacturer in safety data sheet ( SDS) very important for all safety & non- safety professionals Section 1 – Identification • Section 2 – Hazard(s) • Section 3 – Composition • Section 4 – First-Aid Measures • Section 5 – Fire-Fighting Measures • Section 6 – Accidental Release Measures • Section 7 – Handling and Storage • Section 8 – Exposure Controls/Personal Protection • Section 9 – Physical and Chemical Properties • Section 10 – Stability and Reactivity • Section 11 – Toxicological Information • Section 12 – Ecological Information • Section 13 – Disposal Information • Section 14 – Transport Information • Section 15 – Regulatory Information • Section 16 – Other Information Raise your standard by joining live OSHA training with OSHA authorized trainer, your career & income grow when your knowledge & confidence grow. Save your seat here https://lnkd.in/dHTtysh

9

ISO 14064 is an international standard that provides organizations with a framework to effectively manage and reduce their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. It helps businesses and projects with the following: ** Quantifying and reporting GHG emissions across all operational levels. ** Setting actionable emission reduction targets. ** Enhancing transparency through credible and verifiable emissions data. By adopting ISO 14064, organizations can improve their sustainability practices, reduce their carbon footprint, and contribute to a greener future. It’s an essential tool for any business serious about climate action and environmental responsibility. #Sustainability #ISO14064 #ClimateAction #GHGManagement #EnvironmentalResponsibility

7

♦ Work permits are issued and hardly any spot audits happen to verify their adequacy or efficacy ♠ Trainings &TBTs are conducted and rarely quality of trainers or content is audited ♣ Harnesses & safety gadgets are worn at construction sites but no time to inspect for their fitness ♥ UA, UC, Near misses are reported but quality of reported data is not even on the agenda ♦ Staff is so busy generating reports and filling forms that hardly any quality time is left to invest in the field ♠ Manpower is slashed, budget is sliced but the goal of zero remains I can go on and on. Only concrete safety action demonstrated by senior leadership will work before expecting worthwhile results. #safetyculture #safetyleadership #hsse #hse #esh #learninganddevelopment #safetytraining #safetyquotes #hrd #hrisnight #ceomindset #ceo Larsen And Toubro Construction Grasim Industries Limited | Pulp & Fibre Shell Energy Forvis Mazars in India Schneider Electric

22

4 Comments

Risk-Based Thinking Risk-based thinking is a key concept in the field of quality management and is an integral part of the ISO 9001 standard. It is a proactive and systematic approach to managing risks and opportunities in order to achieve the desired outcomes of an organization. By considering potential risks and opportunities from the beginning of a project or process, organizations can better anticipate and address potential challenges and capitalize on opportunities for improvement. One of the main principles of risk-based thinking is that risks and opportunities are inseparable. By identifying and assessing risks, organizations can not only prevent potential negative outcomes but also identify potential opportunities for improvement. This approach encourages organizations to take a holistic view of their operations and consider all possible factors that may impact their ability to achieve their goals. Risk-based thinking also promotes a culture of continual improvement within an organization. By continuously monitoring and evaluating risks and opportunities, organizations can adapt and evolve in response to changing circumstances. This allows organizations to stay ahead of the curve and remain competitive in the marketplace. In addition, risk-based thinking can help organizations make more informed decisions. By taking a systematic approach to identifying and analyzing risks, organizations can make data-driven decisions that are based on a thorough understanding of potential outcomes. This can lead to more effective strategies and a higher likelihood of success. In essence, organizations can benefit from using risk-based thinking to enhance their operations and achieve their objectives. By taking a proactive approach to managing risks and opportunities, organizations can enhance their performance, foster a culture of continual improvement, and make more informed decisions. By adopting risk-based thinking, organizations can better manage the intricate and everchanging business environment. #Risk #proactive #continualimprovement #opportunities #Riskbasedthinking

9

1 Comment

LOPA:- Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA) is a semi-quantitative risk assessment methodology used to identify and evaluate the layers of protection that prevent or mitigate hazardous events. It's a systematic approach to analyze the effectiveness of multiple safeguards, including: 1. Preventive measures (e.g., alarms, shutdowns) 2. Mitigative measures (e.g., fire suppression systems) 3. Human intervention (e.g., operator response) LOPA aims to: 1. Identify potential hazards and scenarios 2. Evaluate the likelihood and consequence of each scenario 3. Identify and assess the effectiveness of existing safeguards 4. Determine the required risk reduction to meet safety targets 5. Identify gaps in protection and recommend additional safeguards By using LOPA, organizations can: 1. Improve safety performance 2. Reduce risk 3. Optimize safety measures 4. Enhance compliance with regulations and standards 5. Support informed decision-making.

26

2 Comments

Leading and Lagging Indicators in Safety Leading and lagging indicators both promote safety, but they are very different. Understanding the purpose of each will help you better protect your team. 💡 Leading indicators As it pertains to health and safety programs, the Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) defines leading indicators as “proactive, preventive, and predictive measures that provide information about the effective performance of your health and safety activities.” This includes issues that precede injuries, illnesses, and other safety incidents that highlight potential problems with your safety procedures. Used to create positive changes, leading indicators focus on preventative actions that can help workers avoid accidents. 💡 Lagging indicators The opposite of leading indicators, lagging indicators focus on safety incidents that happened in the past. Primarily used to highlight existing failures in your safety program, monitoring lagging indicators allows you to make positive changes, instead of letting the same hazards keep causing accidents. A good safety program should includes both leading and lagging indicators. The former promotes positive changes, while the latter measures the effectiveness of existing safety measures. #oil #LPG #safety #learning #safetyanalyse #leading #lagging #indicators #refinery #plant #facilities #piping #storage #tank #vessel #goodsafetyprogram #safeoperation #maintenance #inspection

46

1 Comment