Presentation 2
Presentation 2
Presentation 2
U18CE702C
While sustainability obviously matters in every industry, there are a few reasons why
it’s a particular concern in engineering:
• Engineering uses a lot of the earth’s resources, including, carbon, energy, water,
and raw materials.
• Engineering projects also produce a lot of waste.
• The machinery and vehicles used in engineering can produce harmful emissions
and noise pollution.
• Waste from engineering and development produces pollutants that can
contaminate the air and water.
• Local engineering projects can have a long-lasting global impact.
• Engineers can play an important role in sustainable community development
This puts engineers in a powerful position: since they are the source of the problem, they get to decide how to
solve it.
While sustainability has to be an organisation-wide effort, engineers decisions carry more weight because
they’re responsible for the design and execution of new projects. They decide how to meet the requirements of
a job. They can help choose and procure the materials and supplies, and have ideas on how to use equipment
and machinery more efficiently to finish a task faster.
A project’s efficiency and success depend largely on the engineers. If they start following sustainable
practices, the environmental impact of the whole team will probably improve.
Engineering Principles for Sustainability
The principles are not prescriptive. They do not provide engineers with a
definitive methodology for deriving a sustainable design. Rather, they provide
engineers with overarching concepts that can be used along with traditional
design principles to develop new products and services to be applied for the
growth and development of human society, while simultaneously minimizing the
impact of these designs on the global ecosystem.
Classification of sustainable engineering principles versus
environmental, social, and economic criteria.
Various principles of sustainable engineering versus environmental,
social, and economic poles (related to above figure)
But some others, which are placed along the sides of the triangle, have
connections to two of the poles of the diagram and address both societal
and economic, or both economic and environmental concerns in some
proportion.
Those principles placed in the center of the diagram combine all three
aspects of sustainability to a certain degree and hence their
implementation would benefit all societal, environmental, and economic
stakeholders. We should not consider this collection of principles set in
stone
Sustainability Approaches in Engineering
This example presents a success story about how sustainable engineering has
been applied to address a critical community need.
The need is always placed in the center of an engineering project and directs
design efforts. In this case, the need was a flood prevention system.
Only then the benefits of new ideas and new engineering developments
become available to society.
Here we can identify the role of technology as some sort of portal through
which the established principles of sustainable design and
engineering may affect people’s lifestyle.
Below fig. shows how the most general sustainability principles are
narrowed down to specific material outcomes for the society.
Hierarchy of sustainability guidelines
and role of technologies emphasized.
What are the Sustainable Development Goals
(SDGs)? The systems approach depicts
sustainable development as
In September 2015, world leaders from all 193 the intersection of the goals
member states of the United Nations (UN) made attributed to three interlinked
history by unanimously adopting a 15-year plan systems: environmental (or
for global sustainable development. ecological), economic and
social.
Known as Agenda 2030, the plan centers on 17
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) that aim
for economic growth, social justice and
environmental protection everywhere in the world,
leaving nobody behind.
Programs that focus on individual goals in isolation are likely to miss opportunities
for increasing the impact of limited resources (via synergies and reinforcing
feedbacks).
In the worst case, a narrow focus that fails to see cross-goal negative feedbacks (e.g.
pursuing economic growth without connecting to social or environmental impacts)
can entirely undermine the impacts a given sustainable development program is
aiming to achieve.
Changes in one affect changes in all. Failing to recognize these interactions is leading to
deterioration of the whole Earth system.
It has become increasingly clear that safeguarding our land, oceans, freshwater and
climate is a precondition for social justice and strong economic development and vice
versa. Failing to capture these interactions can undermine critical parts of the functioning
whole.
•One place vs. the world:
SDG interactions can be affected by multiple factors like timespan, geography, governance,
cultural practices and more.
SDG implementation calls for a deep understanding of site-specific context, policy and
knowledge, local land management, to truly comprehend global and regional implications.
It is essential to be able to answer: what does progress mean towards a particular SDG in a local
or regional context? before setting an implementation strategy. Similarly, we cannot assume
that the sum of local actions will add up to ensure sustainability globally.
•Leveraging synergies:
Effectively capturing synergies across SDG goals can also lead to increased overall
impact including cost savings.
For example, one study showed how simultaneously targeting energy security (goal 7),
climate change (goal 13) and air pollution (linked to multiple goals) in energy systems
could improve all three at only slightly higher cost than achieving just the climate
change goal alone.
Climate change impacts construction