Advantages of Sampling Over Complete Count: Presenter Dr. S M Shafiqul Islam Professor of Statistics

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Advantages of Sampling

over Complete Count


Presenter
Dr. S M Shafiqul Islam
Professor of Statistics
Less time- There is considerable saving in time and
labor since only a representative part of the population
has to be examined. The sampling results can be
obtained more rapidly and the data can be analyzed
much faster since relatively fewer data have to be
collected and processed.
Reduced cost of the survey- Sampling usually results in
reduction in cost in terms of money and in terms of
man hours. Since in most of the cases our resources
are limited in terms of money and the time within
which the results of the survey should be obtained, it is
usually imperative to resort to sampling rather than
complete enumeration.
Greater accuracy of results- The results of a sample survey are much
more reliable than those obtained from a complete census due to the
following reasons:
It is always possible to determine the extent of the sampling error.
The non-sampling error due to number of factors such as training of
field workers, measuring and recording observations, biases due to
interviewers, etc. are likely to be of a serious nature in complete census
than in a sample survey. In a sample survey non-sampling errors can be
controlled more effectively by employing more qualified and better
trained personnel, better supervision. Effective control of non-sampling
errors more than compensates the errors in the estimates due to
sampling. As such more sophisticated statistical techniques can be
employed to obtain relatively more reliable results.
Greater scope- Sample survey has generally
greater scope as compared with complete
census. Since sample survey saves in time
and money, it is possible to have a thorough
and intensive enquiry because a more
detailed information can be obtained from a
small group of respondents.
Population is too large- If the population is too
large, as for example, trees in a jungle, we are
left with no way but to resort to sampling.
Testing is destructive- If testing is destructive,
i.e., if the quality of an article can be
determined only by destroying the article in
the process of testing, for example:
Testing the breaking strength of chalks,
Testing crackers and explosives,
Testing the life of an electric bulb etc.
complete enumeration is impracticable and
sampling technique is the only method to be
used in such cases.

You might also like