Political Participation: A Passive Citizenry?

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 24

Political Participation

A passive citizenry?

Political Participation

``actions undertaken by ordinary citizens that are intended, directly or indirectly, to influence the selection of government personnel and/or the policy decisions they make

In Liberal Democracies
Voting in elections is only one of the activities of political participation. Institutional context, especially the party system, has a clear impact on electoral or other forms of political participation.

Totalitarian Model of Political Participation


Citizens were involved in politics only when mobilized by the party-state to implement policies already made. The author of ``Political Participation in the USSR" (1979) suggested that his book might as well be subtitled ``How and why do Soviet politics involve the people?"

In Mainland China

From ``mobilized political participation to ``optional political participation

``Political Participation in Communist China (1967)


``mass line emphasizes direct contact between cadres and masses as the surest means of eliciting popular participation and keeping political leaders in touch with popular demands In broadest terms, Communist mobilization of the masses has politicized an apolitical population.

``Citizens and Groups in Contemporary China (1987)

``Chinese citizens do in fact regularly pursue their interests with a repertoire of tactics tailored to these constraints

``Political Participation in Rural China (1988)

In general, males, with ``good" class origins and some education, who were strong, skilled, and in their working prime, participated at higher rates.

Participatory Activities in Mainland China


Some common political activities in a democracy, such as donations for opposition parties or voting for government leaders, do not exist. Other forms of activities, like reporting to the ``letters and visits offices" or utilizing patron-client relations, would be rare in a liberal democracy.

Five Participatory Modes


Mean score Appeals
Adversarial activities Cronyism Resistance Protest

1988 0.87
0.25 0.22 0.28 0.05

1996 1.04
0.32 0.34 0.16 0.19

Appeals
Complain through the bureaucratic hierarchy Complain through political organizations Complain through the trade unions Complain through deputies to local peoples congresses

Adversarial activities
Write letters to newspaper editors Write letters to government officials at higher levels Complain through the ``letters and visits bureaus

Cronyism
Use connections Send gifts to bureaucrats in exchange for help

Resistance
Slow-down on the job Whip up public opinion in work units against leaders Organize a group of people to fight against leaders

Protest
Strike Participate in demonstration Sue bureaucrats in court

Political Participation in Beijing (Shi 1999)

Peculiarities about Beijing:


Capital of the PRC Per capita GDP US$3,060 (2001) 61 institutions of higher education, with total enrollment of 340,000 2,328,000 residents have had at least some college education 1.28 million CCP members

Explanatory variables of political participation


Education Political interest Political efficacy Political knowledge Civic skills Party mobilization

Political efficacy

Internal efficacy: beliefs about ones own competence to understand and participate in politics
External efficacy: beliefs about the responsiveness of governmental authorities and institutions to citizen demands

Shis findings in Beijing


General level of education increased from 1988 to 1996 People became more concerned with politics and governmental affairs Internal efficacy became stronger Frequency and intensity of political activism increased

Shis findings in Beijing


Both adversarial activities and protest increased substantially between 1988 and 1996 Government activity and education became increasingly important in influencing the level and intensity of political participation

Shi (1999)s Conclusion

Beijing residents have become more politically sophisticated and more assertive in the articulation of their interests

Compared with TW & HK

traditional orientation
moral government moral leader state precedes over individual elitism (better educated) paternalism stability above pluralism

Traditional orientation

People with traditional orientation tend to be:


less educated older living in villages and towns employed in blue-collar jobs

fairly consistent across the 3 societies

Effect on political participation


education is a most important factor the impact of political interest is far more pronounced in TW & HK Party membership in ML HK: more individually-based traditional orientation has the least influence

You might also like