Electrochemistry Vasudev M230776CY
Electrochemistry Vasudev M230776CY
Electrochemistry Vasudev M230776CY
Subject: Electrochemistry
by
Submitted to:
Dr. Minimol
Menamparambath
Department of Chemistry
National Institute of Technology
Calicut_673601 (India)
1
ELECTROCHEMICAL CAPACITORS
The reason why electrochemical capacitors have been able to attract widespread attention is
illustrated above, in which typical energy storage and conversion devices are represented in the
2
so-called “Ragone Plot” in terms of their specific energy and specific power. Electrochemical
capacitors close the gap between batteries and traditional capacitors such as electrolytic
capacitors or metallized film capacitors. This gap spans several orders of magnitude in terms
of both specific energy and specific power 3.
3
Fig 2: A single-cell double-layer capacitor's working principle and an example of the potential
drop at the electrode/electrolyte interface.
4
groups appear in aqueous electrolytes. Oxygen-containing groups can increase the stability of
activated carbon in anodes in organic electrolytes but reduce it of cathodes. Larger surface
areas can reduce the stability and conductivity of activated carbon.
5
Classification of electrochemical capacitors: Based on Electrolyte
Organic:
Organic electrolytes in electrochemical capacitors allow higher cell voltages, typically up to
2.3 V and briefly even 2.7 V, increasing energy storage due to the squared relationship between
voltage and energy. To achieve even higher voltages (up to 3.2 V), high-purity electrolytes and
corrosion-resistant coatings on carbon electrodes are required. However, organic electrolytes
have a higher resistivity (20-50 times that of aqueous electrolytes), which increases the total
series resistance (ESR) and limits power output. This reduction in power is partially offset by
the higher cell voltage achievable, but efficiency is still compromised.
Aqueous:
Aqueous electrolytes in electrochemical capacitors are limited to a unit cell voltage of about 1
V, which reduces energy storage compared to organic electrolytes. However, they offer
advantages such as higher conductivity (e.g. 0.8 S/cm for H₂SO₄), lower c osts and less
demanding cleaning. NEC and ECOND capacitors, as well as laboratory -developed glassy
carbon-based capacitors, use aqueous electrolytes to achieve high power density. The capacitor
design, including electrode porosity, must match the properties of the electrolyte. To prevent
electrolyte depletion, high concentration is required, particularly for organic electrolytes where
solubility limits can affect performance. 3
PSEUDOCAPACITORS:
The charge storage mechanisms of electrochemical SCs are characterized as follows and shown
in Fig. 1: (i) electric double layer charge storage mechanism (EDL), also known as non -faradaic
charge storage mechanism. Under certain conditions, charge transfer/redox reactions do not
occur in each electrode-electrolyte interface because they are thermodynamically or kinetically
unfavorable. The adsorption-desorption process takes place, which is therefore referred to as
the non-Faradaic process. (ii) The Faradaic charge storage mechanism, which is based on the
oxidation-reduction reaction (redox reaction), is a pseudocapacitive charge storage mechanism.
Electrodes on which Faradaic processes take place are also called charge transfer electrodes.
They are further categorized into intrinsic and extrinsic type pseudocapacitors.4
6
Fig 1: Classification of electrochemical capacitors based on charge storage mechanism:
EDLCs, Pseudocapacitors (Intrinsic and extrinsic).
Pseudocapacitance is an electrochemical energy storage mechanism discovered in 1941, which
involves fast, reversible Faradaic reactions at or near the electrode surface. Initially described
by Grahame and later expanded upon by Conway and Gileadi, pseudocapacitance differs from
pure electrostatic double-layer capacitance and traditional battery reactions. In the 1970s,
researchers identified ruthenium oxide (RuO₂) as a promising pseudocapacitive material due
to its reversible surface redox reactions. Later, low-cost alternatives like manganese oxide and
conducting polymers were explored. In the 1990s, the concept was applied to Li⁺ intercalation
materials, further broadening pseudocapacitor research, which now includes materials such as
MXenes. Modern pseudocapacitors integrate nanostructured materials for enhanced surface
area, rapid ion transport, and improved cycling stability. 5
In 1962, Conway and colleagues coined "pseudocapacitance" to describe a unique type of
reversible capacitance related to electrochemical ion adsorption on electrodes, initially defined
by ion monolayer adsorption on platinum. This was termed adsorption pseudocapacitance.
Later, with materials like RuO₂, Conway proposed redox pseudocapacitance, where charge is
stored through surface redox reactions, and intercalation pseudocapacitance, observed in
Nb₂O₅, where ions integrate within the material. These types of pseudocapacitance provide a
linear relationship with potential, showing distinct energy storage benefits, especially in
Faradaic and capacitive contributions. 4
7
Fig 2. As per Conway, images depict the illustration of the three types of pseudocapacitive mechanisms:
(a) Adsorption pseudocapacitance, (b) Redox pseudocapacitance, and (c) Intercalation
pseudocapacitance.
Adsorption Capacitance:
According to Conway et al., the first type of pseudocapacitance, adsorption pseudocapacitance, is
represented by the equation given below, the electro-sorption of cation A + onto the surface of the
conductive surface M is assumed to follow the Langmuir-type electro-sorption isotherm:
Where, CA represents the concentration of the cation, the surface coverage of MA ads is θ, the surface
coverage of M is 1 − θ, K represents the ratio of the forward and reverse reaction rate constant, F
represents the Faraday constant, R represents the ideal gas constant, V represents the electrode potential,
and T represents the temperature. and it can lead to Nernst equation except for the ratio of reduced to
oxidized species has been replaced by the extent of adsorbate surface coverage, θ as represented in:
Where E is the equilibrium potential of the redox couple and E 0 is the standard potential of the redox
couple. Assuming the charge required to complete a monolayer coverage of A ads is q, the
pseudocapacitance CΦ can be defined as: It is obvious from above equation that when the θ value = 0.5,
the maximum pseudocapacitance is obtained. As a result, the pseudocapacitance will be a function of
applied voltage and surface coverage for a purely Langmuir-type electro-sorption, as shown
in Fig. 3(a). Fig. 3(b) depicts the deposition of adsorbates at identifiable subsequent phases of
electrochemical adsorption with increasing coverage, resulting in multiple peaks, and/or lateral
repulsive interaction between adsorbates as θ increases, increasing the dependence of CΦ .
8
Fig 3: Schematic of cyclic voltammograms of extrinsic and intrinsic pseudocapacitive materials. (a)
Pseudocapacitors indicating no diffusion limitation due to fast ion diffusion, (b) extrinsic
pseudocapacitors show the diffusion limitations, and (c) intrinsic pseudocapacitors. 4
Conway’s work on pseudocapacitance advanced the understanding of charge storage mechanisms in
electrochemical energy storage (EES). He highlighted the reversible nature of pseudocapacitance,
contrasting it with batteries, which rely on irreversible phase changes. Costentin and Savéant expanded
on this by suggesting a double-layer plus Faradaic process for enhanced charge storage, where Faradaic
contributions depend on active surface area. Conway also noted the near-ideal cyclic voltammetry (CV)
curve of pseudocapacitors, signifying low hysteresis and high efficiency. These insights support high-
performance pseudocapacitor development. 4
References:
1. Yongyao Xia, et al; Chem. Soc. Rev., 2016,45, 5925-5950
2. Yury Gogotsi, et al; Nature Materials volume 19, pages1151–1163 (2020)
3. M.Carlen; Elec.Chemica. Acta.3 May 2000, Pages 2483-2498
4. P. Bhojane Journal of Energy Storage 45 (2022) 103654
5. Veronica Augustyn, et al; Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 6738−6782